Acura: TLX News
#9201
#9202
But you did get banned for antagonistic/confrontation behavior toward a moderator. We checked
#9203
Ahhh, you missed me so much you checked every day I was gone?? That's really sweet of you, BUT what does this have anything to do with milk?! The most precious, unattainable resource for America's 1%. Stay on topic dude, you're getting lost again!!
#9206
SH-AWD V6 9AT TECH is a value buy at $42k real world price versus a comparably equipped GS 350 AWD. Or do you compare it to an IS 350 AWD?
It's a tweener compared to the two if you are going versus IS/GS comps.
I think the comparisons to an ES is silly because by no stretch of the imagination has an ES been thrown in the "athletic" category. Ever.
It's a tweener compared to the two if you are going versus IS/GS comps.
I think the comparisons to an ES is silly because by no stretch of the imagination has an ES been thrown in the "athletic" category. Ever.
where did you get $42k price?
you are comparing TLX and GS? then what about RLX?
Unless you think TLX is in the same segment as 5 series and E class then TLX should be compared with IS.
That is what i meant when he starting comparing TLX and ES in prices. because ES is really in its own class, for boring people who have never seen anything over 60mph.
you are comparing TLX and GS? then what about RLX?
Unless you think TLX is in the same segment as 5 series and E class then TLX should be compared with IS.
That is what i meant when he starting comparing TLX and ES in prices. because ES is really in its own class, for boring people who have never seen anything over 60mph.
That's the thing, the TL was by all means a midsize sedan (hence, likely eating into RL sales), but priced more to compete against the RWD compacts like the 3 Series - which was a problem since arguably, the TSX (also larger than the 3 Series) also competed in the compact segment (nevermind the ILX which is also a compact in size).
Now that the TSX is on the way out and the Q50/G being the only tweener competitor left (since the CTS moved up a segment), Acura needs to price the TSX so that it's competitive with the Q50 and maybe the MKZ.
The TLX, while OK, could have really used sharp-looking sheetmetal like the 3G TL.
There's a particular Toyota/Lexus troll who can give him a run for the $$.
A Premium AWD Q50 starts at $41.7k with the Sport AWD Q50 going for $45.3k - and Infiniti has been pretty aggressive with lease deals in the past.
In addition, a 3.8 Genesis AWD w/ the Tech package goes for a little over $46k and the 3.8 AWD Ultimate - less than $50k and the Genesis is a good bit larger than the TLX.
Last edited by YEH; 05-13-2014 at 05:47 PM.
#9208
GS has very outdated shape like 10 year old. and without 265 size rear tires. its handling is junk. I don't think you can compare super sophisticated, super quiet , aerodynamic efficient TLX with GS.
both TLX and GS exact same size and I tend to think TLX will have more space.
RLX is topsafety pick+ and TLX should follow it. there is no way any current lexus safer.
both TLX and GS exact same size and I tend to think TLX will have more space.
RLX is topsafety pick+ and TLX should follow it. there is no way any current lexus safer.
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/acura/rlx
infact Lexus LS does not have that much rear legroom than RLX nor its V8 faster or quieter.
Lexus is the most overrated garbage that is dished out to consumers.
infact Lexus LS does not have that much rear legroom than RLX nor its V8 faster or quieter.
Lexus is the most overrated garbage that is dished out to consumers.
2013 Lexus LS 460 Luxury 0-60 mph 5.6
2014 Acura RLX 0-60 mph 5.8
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
It's not that much faster, but the LS is in fact faster than the RLX.
#9209
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,524
Likes: 848
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
The last thing Acura needs to worry about is the TLX making the RLX irrelevant.
I knew someone was going to say because it is a better car than 4G TL the price hike is justified.
a small increase is ok. $5000 is not.
If TLX is the only car on the planet, sure. why not. But the price is determined by the market, competitions and how much are customers willing to pay. Not simply because how much the car is worth. A car's worthiness in Luxury market is as irrelevant as all season tires.
Do we think RLX with all these tech and "superiority" are worth $60k, sure. But it means shit when no one is willing to pay for it.
a small increase is ok. $5000 is not.
If TLX is the only car on the planet, sure. why not. But the price is determined by the market, competitions and how much are customers willing to pay. Not simply because how much the car is worth. A car's worthiness in Luxury market is as irrelevant as all season tires.
Do we think RLX with all these tech and "superiority" are worth $60k, sure. But it means shit when no one is willing to pay for it.
However, it seems to me that the advance trim is not quite a bit of an upgrade over the 4G TL advance trim. The TLX tech trim is right around the level of the previous advance trim, if you see what i mean.
The newer steel alloys have resulted in some pretty rigid modern unibodies. One reason I think Porsche has kept the mainstream products (911, Boxster, Cayman, Cayenne, Panamara) with steel as the main structural material instead of aluminum. That and modern CAD (ProE, SolidWorks, FEA,...) have made cars alot safer and stiffer.
#9210
GS has very outdated shape like 10 year old. and without 265 size rear tires. its handling is junk. I don't think you can compare super sophisticated, super quiet , aerodynamic efficient TLX with GS.
both TLX and GS exact same size and I tend to think TLX will have more space.
RLX is topsafety pick+ and TLX should follow it. there is no way any current lexus safer.
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/acura/rlx
infact Lexus LS does not have that much rear legroom than RLX nor its V8 faster or quieter.
Lexus is the most overrated garbage that is dished out to consumers.
both TLX and GS exact same size and I tend to think TLX will have more space.
RLX is topsafety pick+ and TLX should follow it. there is no way any current lexus safer.
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/acura/rlx
infact Lexus LS does not have that much rear legroom than RLX nor its V8 faster or quieter.
Lexus is the most overrated garbage that is dished out to consumers.
The following users liked this post:
Costco (05-13-2014)
#9213
All the more reason that Acura will need to get the content and pricing right on the TLX.
#9214
I don't see a return to anywhere near TL and TSX combined sales with this TLX.
The following users liked this post:
Hapa DC5 (05-13-2014)
#9218
This is part of my evil plan to keep miles off my V wagon. 23k miles in 17 months is way too much! And yes, I'm nuts to do this and I'm a weirdo for liking the RLX. We've already established those things.
#9219
I think I'm about to jump on the RLX failboat in the form of a lease. When you can get a top of the line Advance model for $49k right now, with all the goodies outside of the hybrid, a larger fuel tank, greater range, and more room in the trunk, the "failure" works in my favor. Why would I wait for the hybrid, which they are going to make as rare as a unicorn, maybe even rarer than my already rare stick V wagon, and pay sticker or even invoice? That's just f'ing nuts!
This is part of my evil plan to keep miles off my V wagon. 23k miles in 17 months is way too much! And yes, I'm nuts to do this and I'm a weirdo for liking the RLX. We've already established those things.
This is part of my evil plan to keep miles off my V wagon. 23k miles in 17 months is way too much! And yes, I'm nuts to do this and I'm a weirdo for liking the RLX. We've already established those things.
#9220
"the MSRP is subject to change prior to availability" Maybe that's part of the delay, because if it really does end up being $15k cheaper then the RLX AWD then Acura just killed their own car.
#9221
Actually the Lexus GS won the a comparison test above the BMW, Audi, and Cadillac. http://www.imakenews.com/bredemannle....cfm?x=b11,0,w
TLX-SH-AWD is also very light, very efficient, super quiet and likely Top Safety Pick+. it should surpass all competition in all objective measures when identical set off tires are provided.
At 3834 pounds, the GS is the lightest of the four and it feels it -- turn-in is sharp and accurate, and weight transfer, whether lateral or longitudinal, is neutral and composed. The Lexus proved the most entertaining, rewarding, and confidence-inspiring up, down, and along our demanding Malibu road loop. Ultimate driving machine? Oh, yeah.
Here are some numbers to consider: 0-60 in 5.4 seconds; the quarter mile in 14.0 at 101.0 mph; lateral acceleration of 0.94 g; figure eight of 25.4 seconds at 0.71 g; EPA fuel economy of 19/28; and observed mpg of 18.9. Not first, not last; just right in the sweet spot. Only 60-0 braking, at 110 feet, was behind the curve, but only by 4 feet versus the Audi and BMW. Then there's price. At $58,800 as tested, the GS F Sport, again, sits comfortably in the sweet spot.
Here are some numbers to consider: 0-60 in 5.4 seconds; the quarter mile in 14.0 at 101.0 mph; lateral acceleration of 0.94 g; figure eight of 25.4 seconds at 0.71 g; EPA fuel economy of 19/28; and observed mpg of 18.9. Not first, not last; just right in the sweet spot. Only 60-0 braking, at 110 feet, was behind the curve, but only by 4 feet versus the Audi and BMW. Then there's price. At $58,800 as tested, the GS F Sport, again, sits comfortably in the sweet spot.
2013 Lexus LS 460 Luxury 0-60 mph 5.6
2014 Acura RLX 0-60 mph 5.8
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
It's not that much faster, but the LS is in fact faster than the RLX.
2014 Acura RLX 0-60 mph 5.8
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
It's not that much faster, but the LS is in fact faster than the RLX.
#9223
TLX FWD 3.5 Tech Package is under 3600lbs.
TLX SH-AWD at most can be around 3800lbs.
Honda is very conservative about EPA ratings. only light weight and aerodynamic cars can beat EPA ratings consistently. Honda technology implementation is very effective.
EPA ratings of Accord sport 2 mpg lower than Altima but in long term driving it got 1.5mpg better. it is like 3.5mpg swing and that despite larger 18 inch rims.
TLX SH-AWD at most can be around 3800lbs.
http://www.hondanews.com/channels/co...onal-auto-show
This powertrain delivers a very direct and rhythmical feeling and sound.
And don't let the power-to-weight ratio of this car fool you.
The TLX is 1 ½ seconds faster 0-to-60 than the outgoing TSX
This powertrain delivers a very direct and rhythmical feeling and sound.
And don't let the power-to-weight ratio of this car fool you.
The TLX is 1 ½ seconds faster 0-to-60 than the outgoing TSX
Honda is very conservative about EPA ratings. only light weight and aerodynamic cars can beat EPA ratings consistently. Honda technology implementation is very effective.
EPA ratings of Accord sport 2 mpg lower than Altima but in long term driving it got 1.5mpg better. it is like 3.5mpg swing and that despite larger 18 inch rims.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...port_update_4/
Despite being heavier and offering more power, the 2.4-liter Accord made fewer visits to the gas pump, returning observed fuel economy of 28.6 mpg, notably better than the 27.2 of the 2.5-liter Altima. (FYI, the Accord is EPA rated at 26/35/29 mpg city/highway/combined, while the Altima touts 27/38/31.)
Despite being heavier and offering more power, the 2.4-liter Accord made fewer visits to the gas pump, returning observed fuel economy of 28.6 mpg, notably better than the 27.2 of the 2.5-liter Altima. (FYI, the Accord is EPA rated at 26/35/29 mpg city/highway/combined, while the Altima touts 27/38/31.)
#9224
We're trying to but trolls make it hard
#9226
GS won because it was the lightest in competition like BMW 3 series. but it does not say much about its ride and safety.
TLX-SH-AWD is also very light, very efficient, super quiet and likely Top Safety Pick+. it should surpass all competition in all objective measures when identical set off tires are provided.
2015 Hyundai Genesis also got Top Safety Pick+ but it gained a lot of weigh.
un reliable/verifiable data. quarter mile times are way off.
TLX-SH-AWD is also very light, very efficient, super quiet and likely Top Safety Pick+. it should surpass all competition in all objective measures when identical set off tires are provided.
2015 Hyundai Genesis also got Top Safety Pick+ but it gained a lot of weigh.
un reliable/verifiable data. quarter mile times are way off.
How long are you planning to milk your tires theory?
please come up with something else to amuse us.
#9227
TLX FWD 3.5 Tech Package is under 3600lbs.
TLX SH-AWD at most can be around 3800lbs.
Honda is very conservative about EPA ratings. only light weight and aerodynamic cars can beat EPA ratings consistently. Honda technology implementation is very effective.
EPA ratings of Accord sport 2 mpg lower than Altima but in long term driving it got 1.5mpg better. it is like 3.5mpg swing and that despite larger 18 inch rims.
TLX SH-AWD at most can be around 3800lbs.
Honda is very conservative about EPA ratings. only light weight and aerodynamic cars can beat EPA ratings consistently. Honda technology implementation is very effective.
EPA ratings of Accord sport 2 mpg lower than Altima but in long term driving it got 1.5mpg better. it is like 3.5mpg swing and that despite larger 18 inch rims.
That is like 50 more miles per tank than EPA.. fucking $8!!
also it is $2 per tank more efficient than Altima!!!
Last edited by oonowindoo; 05-14-2014 at 02:57 PM.
#9228
#9229
#9233
#9234
According to SSFTXX, yes.
Too much aero on the Ferrari.
You have to have perfect balance of ground clearance and aero to form a perfect aerodynamic ultra super handling machine and match that with superior all season 245 tires.
Who needs 275 summer tires when you can have 245 all season. besides you will lose 2 mpg with 275 tires in the back, that is a deal breaker!!
Too much aero on the Ferrari.
You have to have perfect balance of ground clearance and aero to form a perfect aerodynamic ultra super handling machine and match that with superior all season 245 tires.
Who needs 275 summer tires when you can have 245 all season. besides you will lose 2 mpg with 275 tires in the back, that is a deal breaker!!
#9235
I guess it'll just have to take comfort from the fact that it has outsold the RL(X) by 213.43% over the past 10 years (U.S).
#9236
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,524
Likes: 848
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
The RLX FWD is already not selling all that well. The RLX AWD will most likely be selling even slower. With those sale numbers, I don't think Acura should worry too much about hurting the RLX even more with the TLX.
Let's put some numbers into this. The RLX FWD is selling at 350 units/month or so. AWD version might bring that to 400 units. If the TLX steals sales from the RLX, the RLX might go down to 200 units. It's a 50% loss, but in terms of actual units sold, not a big difference. On the other hand, if Acura price the TLX too high, they can risk 5000 units /month to 3000 units/month. Now that would be a bigger problem.
Besides, the TLX and RLX are quite different cars now. Size wise, the RLX is also significantly bigger.
Last edited by iforyou; 05-14-2014 at 06:49 PM.
#9237
#9238
GS won because it was the lightest in competition like BMW 3 series. but it does not say much about its ride and safety.
TLX-SH-AWD is also very light, very efficient, super quiet and likely Top Safety Pick+. it should surpass all competition in all objective measures when identical set off tires are provided.
TLX-SH-AWD is also very light, very efficient, super quiet and likely Top Safety Pick+. it should surpass all competition in all objective measures when identical set off tires are provided.
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/lexus/gs
un reliable/verifiable data. quarter mile times are way off.
#9239
When SSFTSX's beloved vehicle, in OEM factory specs, isn't good enough versus it's competitors, also in OEM factory specs; then there is nothing else to use but aftermarket tires to remedy the beloved vehicle' incompetitiveness.
However, once the competitor vehicles are wearing the same aftermarket tires just like SSFTSX's beloved vehicle, then SSFTSX's beloved vehicle will still lose to the competitors.