Acura: TLX News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2011, 07:07 PM
  #5961  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,173
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
Looks like the aging Honda J-series engine family has reached the dying end of development. Honda has really hit the brick wall in further developing the J-series for more performance.

Historically, MMC update almost always comes with a slight boost in hp. But this time around, Honda can't squeeze out anything more from the 3.7L-V6. Not even a mere 5 more hp !?

But I have to admit that Honda has done a good job fixing the external styling. The MMC TL is much more pleasant to look at now.

Nice work, Honda.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:10 PM
  #5962  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Looks like the aging Honda J-series engine family has reached the dying end of development. Honda has really hit the brick wall in further developing the J-series for more performance.

Historically, MMC update almost always comes with a slight boost in hp. But this time around, Honda can't squeeze out anything more from the 3.7L-V6. Not even a mere 5 more hp !?

But I have to admit that Honda has done a good job fixing the external styling. The MMC TL is much more pleasant to look at now.

Nice work, Honda.
I didn't know you worked for Honda. Can you give us some more detailed specs of this engine?
Old 02-09-2011, 07:12 PM
  #5963  
Racer
 
Dave_W's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lumberton, NJ
Age: 43
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The car is too big. The back of the car is still ugly and the front is way too busy. Why did they have to redesign the TL any way. I think most would agree with me that the 2008 TL looked fine. If only they had given it SH-AWD Leave it to Acura to rewrite the book every 5 years.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:18 PM
  #5964  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
But this time around, Honda can't squeeze out anything more from the 3.7L-V6. Not even a mere 5 more hp !?
Without knowing any details, I'd guess they traded any HP gains for the better fuel economy ratings.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:21 PM
  #5965  
www.colradodetail.com
 
Hondaforlife954's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Aurora CO
Age: 41
Posts: 370
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Id have to say ACURA FAILED ONCE AGAIN...... 3G people.... 3G!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 02-09-2011, 07:21 PM
  #5966  
Pro
 
vybzkartel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 679
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by jwong77
Its an improvement, but not to nitpick, why is the new piece in between the hood and the grille appear to be a different color from the hood itself?
It's a known issue with Acura. Having said that, I don't think it's an Acura only issue.

I think it's because the parts are different material. The bumper and trim around the grille are composite(plastic) and rest of the body is metal.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:30 PM
  #5967  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Looks like the aging Honda J-series engine family has reached the dying end of development. Honda has really hit the brick wall in further developing the J-series for more performance.

Historically, MMC update almost always comes with a slight boost in hp. But this time around, Honda can't squeeze out anything more from the 3.7L-V6. Not even a mere 5 more hp !?

But I have to admit that Honda has done a good job fixing the external styling. The MMC TL is much more pleasant to look at now.

Nice work, Honda.
2012 Genesis has now 333 V6 3.8 with 8speed Auto. let see how much faster and fuel efficient it is than TL SH-AWD in performance tests.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:39 PM
  #5968  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Without knowing any details, I'd guess they traded any HP gains for the better fuel economy ratings.
Apparently he knows the details though.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:40 PM
  #5969  
Drifting
 
Chad05TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,276
Received 166 Likes on 146 Posts
This is a cross between a BMW and an AUDI. haha Looks good but its not Acura style. It says Honda on the front anyway haha

Originally Posted by optical24
I wouldn't mind this to be the next TL




Last edited by Chad05TL; 02-09-2011 at 07:45 PM.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:44 PM
  #5970  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,833
Received 4,039 Likes on 2,513 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Without knowing any details, I'd guess they traded any HP gains for the better fuel economy ratings.

looking at iforyou's post #1644 it looks like the "old" J series has best in class fuel economy for 2WD and probably for AWD when those numbers are released (iforyou summarized that the current AWD has a 1MPG drop from FWD). Not bad for a mid 90's motor
Old 02-09-2011, 07:45 PM
  #5971  
Instructor
 
deantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 33
Posts: 160
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Hmmmmmmm, very unsure of this new grill.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:52 PM
  #5972  
dj5
Burning Brakes
 
dj5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rocket City
Posts: 1,140
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
It's a big improvement, but I'll hold onto my '08 until the 5Gs come out.
Old 02-09-2011, 07:56 PM
  #5973  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
Good job Honda. A step in the right direction. Still not a good looking car, but much better then the pre-mmc beak. This one I wouldn't kick out of bed. The '09-11's I wouldn't even buy a drink.
Old 02-09-2011, 08:02 PM
  #5974  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
looking at iforyou's post #1644 it looks like the "old" J series has best in class fuel economy for 2WD and probably for AWD when those numbers are released (iforyou summarized that the current AWD has a 1MPG drop from FWD). Not bad for a mid 90's motor
BTW, have you seen the MOVE? I was wondering about the trim packages and wheel sizes. From what I can gather, it looks like the following:

TL (FWD) 17"
TL Tech (FWD) 17" (did we lose the Tech 18" option?)
TL Advance (FWD) 18"

TL AWD 18"
TL Tech AWD 18"
TL Advance AWD 19"

Not listed but mentioned in Conrad's transcript "and not to worry, the 6 speed manual transmission will continue to be offered on the TL SH-AWD model"

Does this mean all of them? Or just the Tech and Advance?
Old 02-09-2011, 08:39 PM
  #5975  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,612 Likes on 2,193 Posts
I officially like the 4G TL now. The grille is MUCH better. MUCH MUCH better. More proportional. Less blingy. Less schnozzy. I would not be embarrassed to be found in a TL now.

Great on finally offering the 6AT as well, with pretty decent mileage.

On the whole, I'd prefer that very nice TSX wagon, but I am so glad Acura is listening regarding the TL. I hope they sell more.

Thank you Acura!
Old 02-09-2011, 08:43 PM
  #5976  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Hmmm 20/29mpg, that's pretty much the same as my 07
Old 02-09-2011, 08:45 PM
  #5977  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Lasik, my friend. Lasik.
Well I'm on my iPhone. Need a 2nd look on a big screen.
Old 02-09-2011, 08:48 PM
  #5978  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
4G TL is wider, taller and heavier than 3G and with wider tires.
From Edmunds it say fuel economy will be same for 3.7/3.5. and 3 decibels is alot quieter at highway speeds.



http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...formation.html

A more efficient multi-clutch torque converter that speeds up lock-up will reportedly improve fuel economy with either the base 280-hp 3.5-liter V6 or the 305-hp 3.7-liter V6. In addition, friction reductions on the 3.5-liter (the same ones Honda applied to the 2011 Odyssey, including coated pistons, plateau-honed cylinder bores) further the mpg gains to the point that the car will likely get a 29 mpg highway rating (up 3 from 2011). Both engines get a revised air induction system for better cooling this year.

Inside, the navigation system gets a bigger, 60GB hard drive; more maps; and brighter, crisper graphics: and you get a faster USB port. New features in the Advance package include ventilated seats and a blind spot warning system.

Acura also says the 2012 TL is 3 decibels quieter "at highway speeds," due to improved sound-deadening measures
Old 02-09-2011, 08:52 PM
  #5979  
Pro
 
rhafikjaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 639
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
dont like it reminds me of the current RL and dont like the fog light area at all reminds me of the current MDX..hopefully the 5g looks a little like the 3g and maybe RWD too
Old 02-09-2011, 08:54 PM
  #5980  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Hmmm 20/29mpg, that's pretty much the same as my 07
2007 had a different rating scale and should not be compared to these cars. Based on the current scale, your car would have been 18/26. And don't forget, you have 258 hp not 280 and your car weighed 3559 not 3699 (2011 car).
Old 02-09-2011, 09:02 PM
  #5981  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob

On the whole, I'd prefer that very nice TSX wagon, but I am so glad Acura is listening regarding the TL. I hope they sell more.

Thank you Acura!
I can't wait to see the sales numbers. sometimes it doesn't happen. I remember after the last gen Accord MMC refresh to LEDs, I was really expecting the Accord numbers to go up dramatically. it ended up staying around the same or just slightly better.
Old 02-09-2011, 09:39 PM
  #5982  
Plastic schmastic
 
jimmyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 305
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Epic epic fail in my opinion, and it is all because of that gawd-awful front end!!! I really don't mind the rear and side views. I don't like how the tires/wheels don't appear set out as far relative to the wheel arches too, as stated.
I've had my eye on that Buick, btw, and the interior is every bit as striking as the outside.
OK, in 4-5 more years, I know which car I'll be in......
Old 02-09-2011, 09:54 PM
  #5983  
Intermediate
 
iN VTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South FL
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by stvtec
Way better, but still not nearly as sexy as the 3G.
Originally Posted by VQPower37
x2 ... fo sho
x3... plus cant wait to see the aspec kit on it as someone else mentioned...
Old 02-09-2011, 10:01 PM
  #5984  
DANSOLOW
 
07TLTYPESex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ashville, Ohio
Age: 34
Posts: 156
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by optical24
I wouldn't mind this to be the next TL



knock knock!
who's there?
pontiac G5/6 rip off!

ill pass on both TL's, the 3rd gen is by far the best looking.. the 4th gen CAN be good looking with the right mods as of now.. sorry but acura is getting a FAIL stamp
Old 02-09-2011, 10:09 PM
  #5985  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
2007 had a different rating scale and should not be compared to these cars. Based on the current scale, your car would have been 18/26. And don't forget, you have 258 hp not 280 and your car weighed 3559 not 3699 (2011 car).
i wasnt aware that it changed... link?
Old 02-09-2011, 10:11 PM
  #5986  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
ok after looking, maybe i am smoking too much crack, but i do see a tiny bit of similarity but not really ok bye
Old 02-09-2011, 10:15 PM
  #5987  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
HUGE improvement especially considering it's just a MMC.

The car looks a good amount smaller, the apparent bloated size was a problem I had with the pre-MMC 4G. It's great to know that they're listening.

Here it is with Acura's ground effects kit

Old 02-09-2011, 10:22 PM
  #5988  
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
 
cjTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 30
Posts: 4,899
Received 299 Likes on 207 Posts
I personally love it. I don't really like the color they had, but still. With the body kit, this car looks hot.

Old 02-09-2011, 10:24 PM
  #5989  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
close up pics on tov show the grille has chrome surround with the silver plastic horizontal piece. i like that combo.
Old 02-09-2011, 10:26 PM
  #5990  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
Originally Posted by Costco
HUGE improvement especially considering it's just a MMC.

The car looks a good amount smaller, the apparent bloated size was a problem I had with the pre-MMC 4G. It's great to know that they're listening.

Here it is with Acura's ground effects kit

wow, that actually looks pretty nice. cant believe im saying that!
Old 02-09-2011, 10:27 PM
  #5991  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
still want to know, halogen high beams or is it back to bi-xenon!!!?
Old 02-09-2011, 10:32 PM
  #5992  
Plastic schmastic
 
jimmyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 305
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by cjTL
I personally love it. I don't really like the color they had, but still. With the body kit, this car looks hot.

Hmmmm, from the A pillar back, isn't that the next to last generation of Maxima?
Old 02-09-2011, 10:33 PM
  #5993  
Instructor
 
Conan O'Brien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 39
Posts: 117
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by cjTL
I personally love it. I don't really like the color they had, but still. With the body kit, this car looks hot.
wow that looks so much better than the pictures on the last page. i wouldn't mind that at all.
Old 02-09-2011, 10:39 PM
  #5994  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Why would you want bi-xenon anyway? Maybe I don't understand it correctly, but I've read that HIDs don't like being cycled (on/off), and typically I don't keep highbeams on very long, if at all.

I suppose it looks better.
Old 02-09-2011, 10:45 PM
  #5995  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,180
Received 2,774 Likes on 1,977 Posts
well in my 3G TL and most other cars that have projector headlights, its not actually turning off or on, inside there is a shutter that lifts up and down when you want the highbeams on.


i mean what other luxury cars dont have HIDs for both low and high beam?

well except for the low end Lexus and BMW models which are only halogen for both.

Last edited by Mizouse; 02-09-2011 at 10:48 PM.
Old 02-09-2011, 10:45 PM
  #5996  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
mrlal8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,110
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
still think it looks terrible

the 3g with the aspec looks like a sports car

this things looks like a cross over between an SUV, and a station wagon...why does the car sit so high
Old 02-09-2011, 10:56 PM
  #5997  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Huge improvement. I definitely wasn't expecting this much change to the exterior.
Old 02-09-2011, 10:57 PM
  #5998  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
well in my 3G TL and most other cars that have projector headlights, its not actually turning off or on, inside there is a shutter that lifts up and down when you want the highbeams on.


i mean what other luxury cars dont have HIDs for both low and high beam?

well except for the low end Lexus and BMW models which are only halogen for both.
Ahh, I see. Then xenons would actually be more prone to failure because the low beam turns off then turn on when you use high beams, right?

I have very little clue about em, my car doesn't have HIDs
Old 02-09-2011, 10:58 PM
  #5999  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
i wasnt aware that it changed... link?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Compare+Old+and...+2007+Acura+TL

Last edited by Colin; 02-09-2011 at 11:01 PM.
Old 02-09-2011, 11:03 PM
  #6000  
Pro
 
Hacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 591
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Looks like the 3rd gen just went up in value

I actually like the 4th gen look but felt it lacked a few key design notes in the front. The rear is pretty nice but a slightly subtler look would have appealed to more. It just didn't wow me everytime I saw it like the Type-S with A-Spec kit.

Timeless baby!


Quick Reply: Acura: TLX News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.