Acura: NSX News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2015 | 02:31 PM
  #5721  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,695
Likes: 22,991
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
So a vehicle that will be primarily used on warm sunny summer days has heated seats, but not cooled?
Yes. Because Honda wants you to perpetually have warm bums.
Old 08-19-2015 | 02:45 PM
  #5722  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
So a vehicle that will be primarily used on warm sunny summer days has heated seats, but not cooled?
That will be included in the tire upgrade package. SSFTSX will be happy.
Old 08-19-2015 | 02:50 PM
  #5723  
TacoBello's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30,487
Likes: 4,416
From: In an igloo
No no... It does have cooled seats, there's just not an easy way to activate them. To do so, follow these four easy steps:

1. While the car is running, rev the engine to JUST below redline.
2. If you are wearing a seatbelt, unbuckle it.
3. Wave your arms in thr air like you just don't care.
4. Put the car into drive (remember, the engine still has to be revving at just below redline)
5. Cooled seats!!
Old 08-19-2015 | 03:47 PM
  #5724  
SamDoe1's Avatar
Ex-OEM King
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 16,411
Likes: 6,224
From: Minnesnowta
Be happy that there are buttons for the heated seats and that the controls aren't buried in menu after menu in the screen below the upper screen that sort of controls the upper screen except for some of the features of the upper screen while the lower screen shows some info which can be mirrored by the upper screen but other functions of the upper screen can only be controlled by the buttons below the lower screen.

make sense? ok ship it.
The following 2 users liked this post by SamDoe1:
fsttyms1 (08-20-2015), RPhilMan1 (08-20-2015)
Old 08-19-2015 | 03:55 PM
  #5725  
oonowindoo's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 23,362
Likes: 4,273
From: Los Angeles
anyone noticed the volume control....someone tell me that is an actual button at least. not the touch screen sensor shit....

I HATE touch screen volume controls.... it irritates me touching the same spot over and over again in a short period of time.

Just noticed the screen is also more inward... so good luck finding the back, menu and volume on screen buttons while you are driving.
The following 2 users liked this post by oonowindoo:
Flipster23 (08-19-2015), fsttyms1 (08-20-2015)
Old 08-19-2015 | 04:11 PM
  #5726  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,695
Likes: 22,991
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
anyone noticed the volume control....someone tell me that is an actual button at least. not the touch screen sensor shit....

I HATE touch screen volume controls.... it irritates me touching the same spot over and over again in a short period of time.

Just noticed the screen is also more inward... so good luck finding the back, menu and volume on screen buttons while you are driving.
You n00b...by the time this car releases, everything will be voice-activated.
Old 08-19-2015 | 05:17 PM
  #5727  
oonowindoo's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 23,362
Likes: 4,273
From: Los Angeles
and it is already behind.... 7 series is using hand gestures. All the rappers can do what they do best while driving.
Old 08-19-2015 | 05:34 PM
  #5728  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
and it is already behind.... 7 series is using hand gestures. All the rappers can do what they do best while driving.
Honda will ... delay it again after watching that vid..
Old 08-19-2015 | 09:08 PM
  #5729  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,695
Likes: 22,991
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
and it is already behind.... 7 series is using hand gestures. All the rappers can do what they do best while driving.
Sweet...so, what happens when you give the car the 1-fingered salute...?
Old 08-20-2015 | 12:59 AM
  #5730  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,201
Likes: 1,161
From: YVR
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
You'd think that an exceptionally large and successful engineering company that manufactures F1 motors, for example Honda, would be able to do the same.
Originally Posted by TacoBello
You act like cosworth is the only company who can successfully build a turbo engine

I hate to say it, but if an auto manufacturer can't build a reliable turbo engine, they likely shouldn't be building cars. This isn't 1980 anymore. Who isn't building turbo engines these days?

Although Honda hasn't released many turbo engines, it's not rocket science for a billion dollar company. I'm sure Honda has experimented with them plenty in their R&D centres. Soon enough a good portion of Hondas will be pushing boost.
First of all, expertise (and successes) in building F1/Indy/CART engines doesn't always translate into successful production car technology instances, such as producing the doomed 5AT tranny as used on the 2G TL/CL, producing the oil-burning 3.7L-V6 as used on the 4G TL, as well as integrating the current 3rd party 9AT tranny into the TLX/MDX flawlessly.

Moreover, even though that Honda is having great success in Indy/CART, previously as competition engine supplier and now as sole engine supplier; Honda is NOT having any success in F1 racing for the past 2 decades during its on and off participation in the F1 arena, either as an engine maker or as a full-blown F1 team.

Even though Honda was having great success with its F1 1.5L-turbo-V6 back in the 80's, the current Honda F1 hybrid turbo V6 is unreliable and is seriously underpowered, and thus rendering the McLaren-Honda team to the 2nd-last place in the current Constructor Standings.

You're right in that this isn't the 80's any more, but Honda still managed to fuck up the 5AT in the 2000's, and the 3.7L-V6 and 9AT in the 2010's.

Unlike other top automakers such as Audi/VW/BMW/MB who have already been producing force-induction production car engines for years (and Audi has been for decades), Honda doesn't have a long history and a good track record in building turbo-charged production car engines.

Back in the 80's, Honda first used a "variable-geometry-turbo 2L-V6" in its JDM Legend, but dropped this engine option after just 2 years. In the recent days, the turbo 2.3L-I4, as used on the RDX, was not well received and thus was also discontinued.

Rocket science or not. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.

At this very moment, Honda does NOT have any production vehicle equipped with force-induction engine. So much for the Honda production vehicle turbo experience.

On the other hand, Cosworth is a well renowned high performance engine shop in Europe, although much less known in North America.

Other than building successful race engines in motor racing, Cosworth also has a long history of building successful high performance turbo engines for production road vehicles in Europe.

Cosworth, in collaborate with European Ford Motor Co., has crank out many successful high performance turbo "RS Cosworth" trims for some regular European Ford models, much like the AMG trim for MB, S/RS trim for Audi, and M trim for BMW; dated back to the 80's.

So Cosworth has accumulated decades of expertise in successful turbo application in production vehicles, which is similar to ZF's extensive expertise in building production vehicle transmissions.

Therefore, Honda is smart to select Cosworth to construct its latest high tech turbo V6 and to select ZF to build its latest high tech 9AT tranny, rather than having to waste time and resources to overcome the steep learning curves by making them inhouse.
Old 08-20-2015 | 01:53 AM
  #5731  
oonowindoo's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 23,362
Likes: 4,273
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Sweet...so, what happens when you give the car the 1-fingered salute...?
why dont you find out when the new 7 hits the dealer
Old 08-20-2015 | 04:40 AM
  #5732  
MSZ's Avatar
MSZ
Lola
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 257
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
First of all, expertise (and successes) in building F1/Indy/CART engines doesn't always translate into successful production car technology instances, such as producing the doomed 5AT tranny as used on the 2G TL/CL, producing the oil-burning 3.7L-V6 as used on the 4G TL, as well as integrating the current 3rd party 9AT tranny into the TLX/MDX flawlessly.

Moreover, even though that Honda is having great success in Indy/CART, previously as competition engine supplier and now as sole engine supplier; Honda is NOT having any success in F1 racing for the past 2 decades during its on and off participation in the F1 arena, either as an engine maker or as a full-blown F1 team.

Even though Honda was having great success with its F1 1.5L-turbo-V6 back in the 80's, the current Honda F1 hybrid turbo V6 is unreliable and is seriously underpowered, and thus rendering the McLaren-Honda team to the 2nd-last place in the current Constructor Standings.

You're right in that this isn't the 80's any more, but Honda still managed to fuck up the 5AT in the 2000's, and the 3.7L-V6 and 9AT in the 2010's.

Unlike other top automakers such as Audi/VW/BMW/MB who have already been producing force-induction production car engines for years (and Audi has been for decades), Honda doesn't have a long history and a good track record in building turbo-charged production car engines.

Back in the 80's, Honda first used a "variable-geometry-turbo 2L-V6" in its JDM Legend, but dropped this engine option after just 2 years. In the recent days, the turbo 2.3L-I4, as used on the RDX, was not well received and thus was also discontinued.

Rocket science or not. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.

At this very moment, Honda does NOT have any production vehicle equipped with force-induction engine. So much for the Honda production vehicle turbo experience.

On the other hand, Cosworth is a well renowned high performance engine shop in Europe, although much less known in North America.

Other than building successful race engines in motor racing, Cosworth also has a long history of building successful high performance turbo engines for production road vehicles in Europe.

Cosworth, in collaborate with European Ford Motor Co., has crank out many successful high performance turbo "RS Cosworth" trims for some regular European Ford models, much like the AMG trim for MB, S/RS trim for Audi, and M trim for BMW; dated back to the 80's.

So Cosworth has accumulated decades of expertise in successful turbo application in production vehicles, which is similar to ZF's extensive expertise in building production vehicle transmissions.

Therefore, Honda is smart to select Cosworth to construct its latest high tech turbo V6 and to select ZF to build its latest high tech 9AT tranny, rather than having to waste time and resources to overcome the steep learning curves by making them inhouse.
Just a small correction for you:

The Honda turbo engines can be found in at least two JDM models.
Old 08-20-2015 | 05:20 AM
  #5733  
neuronbob's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 20,019
Likes: 4,618
From: Cleveland area, OH
Acura: NSX News **Production Postponed (page 140)**

Meh to the delay. I already have a Sport Hybrid, so I've forgotten about the NSX already. Now I just need upgraded tires and it'll be even faster.

*sigh*
The following 4 users liked this post by neuronbob:
JS + XES (08-20-2015), RPhilMan1 (08-20-2015), ttribe (08-20-2015), Yumcha (08-20-2015)
Old 08-20-2015 | 08:06 AM
  #5734  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,383
Likes: 3,063
From: Appleton WI
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Meh to the delay. I already have a Sport Hybrid, so I've forgotten about the NSX already. Now I just need upgraded tires and it'll be even faster.

*sigh*
Wanna be even faster?? Put some spring spacers in and raise the car an inch or 2 so that you have even more superior ground clearance. Oh, and wrap your mirrors with Carbon Fiber vinyl wrap so that they look even more expensive.
Old 08-20-2015 | 08:24 AM
  #5735  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,202
Likes: 4,312
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
First of all, expertise (and successes) in building F1/Indy/CART engines doesn't always translate into successful production car technology instances, such as producing the doomed 5AT tranny as used on the 2G TL/CL, producing the oil-burning 3.7L-V6 as used on the 4G TL, as well as integrating the current 3rd party 9AT tranny into the TLX/MDX flawlessly.

Moreover, even though that Honda is having great success in Indy/CART, previously as competition engine supplier and now as sole engine supplier; Honda is NOT having any success in F1 racing for the past 2 decades during its on and off participation in the F1 arena, either as an engine maker or as a full-blown F1 team.

Even though Honda was having great success with its F1 1.5L-turbo-V6 back in the 80's, the current Honda F1 hybrid turbo V6 is unreliable and is seriously underpowered, and thus rendering the McLaren-Honda team to the 2nd-last place in the current Constructor Standings.

You're right in that this isn't the 80's any more, but Honda still managed to fuck up the 5AT in the 2000's, and the 3.7L-V6 and 9AT in the 2010's.

Unlike other top automakers such as Audi/VW/BMW/MB who have already been producing force-induction production car engines for years (and Audi has been for decades), Honda doesn't have a long history and a good track record in building turbo-charged production car engines.

Back in the 80's, Honda first used a "variable-geometry-turbo 2L-V6" in its JDM Legend, but dropped this engine option after just 2 years. In the recent days, the turbo 2.3L-I4, as used on the RDX, was not well received and thus was also discontinued.

Rocket science or not. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.

At this very moment, Honda does NOT have any production vehicle equipped with force-induction engine. So much for the Honda production vehicle turbo experience.

On the other hand, Cosworth is a well renowned high performance engine shop in Europe, although much less known in North America.

Other than building successful race engines in motor racing, Cosworth also has a long history of building successful high performance turbo engines for production road vehicles in Europe.

Cosworth, in collaborate with European Ford Motor Co., has crank out many successful high performance turbo "RS Cosworth" trims for some regular European Ford models, much like the AMG trim for MB, S/RS trim for Audi, and M trim for BMW; dated back to the 80's.

So Cosworth has accumulated decades of expertise in successful turbo application in production vehicles, which is similar to ZF's extensive expertise in building production vehicle transmissions.

Therefore, Honda is smart to select Cosworth to construct its latest high tech turbo V6 and to select ZF to build its latest high tech 9AT tranny, rather than having to waste time and resources to overcome the steep learning curves by making them inhouse.
Honda essentially won the 2009 Formula 1 drivers and constructors championship titles with the Brawn GP01 which was derived from Honda's 2009 RA109 design. Honda paid the development cost until early 2009 to get the Honda engine chassis modified into the MB engine.

The Inside Story Of The Stillborn Honda That Would Have Dominated F1
Old 08-20-2015 | 09:04 AM
  #5736  
SamDoe1's Avatar
Ex-OEM King
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 16,411
Likes: 6,224
From: Minnesnowta
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
First of all, expertise (and successes) in building F1/Indy/CART engines doesn't always translate into successful production car technology instances, such as producing the doomed 5AT tranny as used on the 2G TL/CL, producing the oil-burning 3.7L-V6 as used on the 4G TL, as well as integrating the current 3rd party 9AT tranny into the TLX/MDX flawlessly.

Moreover, even though that Honda is having great success in Indy/CART, previously as competition engine supplier and now as sole engine supplier; Honda is NOT having any success in F1 racing for the past 2 decades during its on and off participation in the F1 arena, either as an engine maker or as a full-blown F1 team.

Even though Honda was having great success with its F1 1.5L-turbo-V6 back in the 80's, the current Honda F1 hybrid turbo V6 is unreliable and is seriously underpowered, and thus rendering the McLaren-Honda team to the 2nd-last place in the current Constructor Standings.

You're right in that this isn't the 80's any more, but Honda still managed to fuck up the 5AT in the 2000's, and the 3.7L-V6 and 9AT in the 2010's.

Unlike other top automakers such as Audi/VW/BMW/MB who have already been producing force-induction production car engines for years (and Audi has been for decades), Honda doesn't have a long history and a good track record in building turbo-charged production car engines.

Back in the 80's, Honda first used a "variable-geometry-turbo 2L-V6" in its JDM Legend, but dropped this engine option after just 2 years. In the recent days, the turbo 2.3L-I4, as used on the RDX, was not well received and thus was also discontinued.

Rocket science or not. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.

At this very moment, Honda does NOT have any production vehicle equipped with force-induction engine. So much for the Honda production vehicle turbo experience.

On the other hand, Cosworth is a well renowned high performance engine shop in Europe, although much less known in North America.

Other than building successful race engines in motor racing, Cosworth also has a long history of building successful high performance turbo engines for production road vehicles in Europe.

Cosworth, in collaborate with European Ford Motor Co., has crank out many successful high performance turbo "RS Cosworth" trims for some regular European Ford models, much like the AMG trim for MB, S/RS trim for Audi, and M trim for BMW; dated back to the 80's.

So Cosworth has accumulated decades of expertise in successful turbo application in production vehicles, which is similar to ZF's extensive expertise in building production vehicle transmissions.

Therefore, Honda is smart to select Cosworth to construct its latest high tech turbo V6 and to select ZF to build its latest high tech 9AT tranny, rather than having to waste time and resources to overcome the steep learning curves by making them inhouse.
tl;dr

cliffs?
Old 08-20-2015 | 09:07 AM
  #5737  
TacoBello's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30,487
Likes: 4,416
From: In an igloo
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
First of all, expertise (and successes) in building F1/Indy/CART engines doesn't always translate into successful production car technology instances, such as producing the doomed 5AT tranny as used on the 2G TL/CL, producing the oil-burning 3.7L-V6 as used on the 4G TL, as well as integrating the current 3rd party 9AT tranny into the TLX/MDX flawlessly.

Moreover, even though that Honda is having great success in Indy/CART, previously as competition engine supplier and now as sole engine supplier; Honda is NOT having any success in F1 racing for the past 2 decades during its on and off participation in the F1 arena, either as an engine maker or as a full-blown F1 team.

Even though Honda was having great success with its F1 1.5L-turbo-V6 back in the 80's, the current Honda F1 hybrid turbo V6 is unreliable and is seriously underpowered, and thus rendering the McLaren-Honda team to the 2nd-last place in the current Constructor Standings.

You're right in that this isn't the 80's any more, but Honda still managed to fuck up the 5AT in the 2000's, and the 3.7L-V6 and 9AT in the 2010's.

Unlike other top automakers such as Audi/VW/BMW/MB who have already been producing force-induction production car engines for years (and Audi has been for decades), Honda doesn't have a long history and a good track record in building turbo-charged production car engines.

Back in the 80's, Honda first used a "variable-geometry-turbo 2L-V6" in its JDM Legend, but dropped this engine option after just 2 years. In the recent days, the turbo 2.3L-I4, as used on the RDX, was not well received and thus was also discontinued.

Rocket science or not. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.

At this very moment, Honda does NOT have any production vehicle equipped with force-induction engine. So much for the Honda production vehicle turbo experience.

On the other hand, Cosworth is a well renowned high performance engine shop in Europe, although much less known in North America.

Other than building successful race engines in motor racing, Cosworth also has a long history of building successful high performance turbo engines for production road vehicles in Europe.

Cosworth, in collaborate with European Ford Motor Co., has crank out many successful high performance turbo "RS Cosworth" trims for some regular European Ford models, much like the AMG trim for MB, S/RS trim for Audi, and M trim for BMW; dated back to the 80's.

So Cosworth has accumulated decades of expertise in successful turbo application in production vehicles, which is similar to ZF's extensive expertise in building production vehicle transmissions.

Therefore, Honda is smart to select Cosworth to construct its latest high tech turbo V6 and to select ZF to build its latest high tech 9AT tranny, rather than having to waste time and resources to overcome the steep learning curves by making them inhouse.
So what do you call the 1G TURBO RDX?
Old 08-20-2015 | 11:09 AM
  #5738  
oonowindoo's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 23,362
Likes: 4,273
From: Los Angeles
who put Indefinitely on the title
Old 08-20-2015 | 11:37 AM
  #5739  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Old 08-20-2015 | 11:44 AM
  #5740  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,695
Likes: 22,991
I'm guessing fattits.
Old 08-20-2015 | 12:03 PM
  #5741  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,522
Likes: 846
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
anyone noticed the volume control....someone tell me that is an actual button at least. not the touch screen sensor shit....

I HATE touch screen volume controls.... it irritates me touching the same spot over and over again in a short period of time.

Just noticed the screen is also more inward... so good luck finding the back, menu and volume on screen buttons while you are driving.
I think the volume control is an actual button, check out the high res pic here:
Related Photos Acura News

I also think the steering wheel has a physical volume control knob which IMO is better since you don't need to take your eyes off the road, and no need to press the same button repeatedly to increase/decrease volume.
Old 08-20-2015 | 12:51 PM
  #5742  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Thank God, that's an actual button.
Old 08-20-2015 | 01:51 PM
  #5743  
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
Some dude
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 347
From: Chicagoland
Did Honda know that they weren't going to release the NSX this year when they started touring across the country with the cars? It seems like a bad strategy: "Hey, look at our cool supercar!! ... we're not going to sell it this year anymore."

Also, I REALLY want to know that engines those cars have. They probably just dropped an LS3 in there.
Old 08-20-2015 | 02:33 PM
  #5744  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,202
Likes: 4,312
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by iforyou
Here's my thought. In 2011/2012, when Honda decided to bring the 2G NSX to reality, the idea was to create a modern NSX that is similar to the 1G NSX. That means mid-engine, rear wheel drive, transverse NA V6 engine. To give it something unique, they were going to add the 3-motor setup.

I'd imagine the above was the idea from the Honda HQ, upper management. I think the engineering team knew that such set up wouldn't be competitive power-wise. The car might drive very well, but as we can see in this forum, power is very important, especially if Honda were to ask for $150k+. People naturally will make comparison. It's also well known that the likes of GT-R, R8, 458, 911, were going to be re-designed by the time the NSX is launched in 2015/2016. As such, bu by late 2012, early 2013, the transverse NA V6 plan was replaced by a longitudinal boosted V6. It gives Honda a much higher ceiling to boost output in the future too.
Yeah, that timeline sounds about right. Since they showed the prototype layout pics in 1/2015 the drivetrain had been designed in 2013-2014. 2015 was the product transition to operations/production/training period. Probably someone's Gantt chart is getting ripped apart now by upper management.

My guess is that even though the new engine was designed and probably prototyped NPI problems were exposed by operations. So they had to change the block and head manufacturing to Cosworth. Maybe it just made more sense to suck up some pride and go to Cosworth, perhaps use their CosCast process? IDK, but this sounds more like a marriage of convenience, than a long term partnership since Cosworth was just announced.

In terms of what's powering the prototypes, probably initial production of the same motor (manufactured on more low rate production 4 and 5 axis CNC than more specialized mass production turning CNC's) that were used for mule V&V testing and now PR tour.

Last edited by Legend2TL; 08-20-2015 at 02:48 PM.
Old 08-20-2015 | 03:18 PM
  #5745  
oonowindoo's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 23,362
Likes: 4,273
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by iforyou
I think the volume control is an actual button, check out the high res pic here:
Related Photos Acura News

I also think the steering wheel has a physical volume control knob which IMO is better since you don't need to take your eyes off the road, and no need to press the same button repeatedly to increase/decrease volume.
I dont know about you, that does not look like a button to me....

Also i for one rarely use anything on the steering wheel. I am too used to the knob.


Old 08-20-2015 | 10:17 PM
  #5746  
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 26,428
Likes: 5,589
From: Spring, TX
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Wanna be even faster?? Put some spring spacers in and raise the car an inch or 2 so that you have even more superior ground clearance. Oh, and wrap your mirrors with Carbon Fiber vinyl wrap so that they look even more expensive.
Door handles too, right? Gotta have expensive door handles.
Old 08-20-2015 | 11:46 PM
  #5747  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,201
Likes: 1,161
From: YVR
Originally Posted by TacoBello
So what do you call the 1G TURBO RDX?
The turbo 2.3L-I4, as used on the RDX, was not well received, and was discontinued for the following generation RDX.

If this unsuccessful attempt of turbo application is all that Honda has got, this is really bad news.
Old 08-21-2015 | 12:00 AM
  #5748  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,201
Likes: 1,161
From: YVR
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
Honda essentially won the 2009 Formula 1 drivers and constructors championship titles with the Brawn GP01 which was derived from Honda's 2009 RA109 design. Honda paid the development cost until early 2009 to get the Honda engine chassis modified into the MB engine.

The Inside Story Of The Stillborn Honda That Would Have Dominated F1
Please remember that this winning Brawn GP01 was using the MB engine, not the Honda engine; and it was a well known fact that the MB engine was the most powerful powerplant in the entire F1 field, during that period of time.

But still, credit must be given to Honda which was responsible for the design of the winning Brawn chassis; but MB was also a critical factor in propelling the Honda-designed F1 car to the podiums.

However, even if the Brawn-Honda did exist, and the specs looked good on paper, many questions remained :

- would that Honda engine as powerful/reliable as the potent MB engine ?
- would the Brawn-Honda had chassis-engine teething issues, much like the current ill-fated McLaren-Honda F1 car ?

But unfortunately we'll never find out the answers.
Old 08-21-2015 | 01:24 AM
  #5749  
oonowindoo's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 23,362
Likes: 4,273
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
The turbo 2.3L-I4, as used on the RDX, was not well received, and was discontinued for the following generation RDX.

If this unsuccessful attempt of turbo application is all that Honda has got, this is really bad news.
I think the 2.3L turbo is not a bad engine but the timing of the introduction was off and it really did not offer anything that a turbo engine was supposed to offer by 2015 standard. (MPG or power). and they put it in the wrong car.
Old 08-21-2015 | 11:23 AM
  #5750  
TacoBello's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30,487
Likes: 4,416
From: In an igloo
Yup, and as far as the RDX 2.3L is concerned, it's not failing all over the place. So again, Edwards argument is null and void.
Old 08-21-2015 | 05:36 PM
  #5751  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,522
Likes: 846
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I dont know about you, that does not look like a button to me....

Also i for one rarely use anything on the steering wheel. I am too used to the knob.


lol sounds like you are a blackberry guy
Old 08-21-2015 | 06:48 PM
  #5752  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,005
Likes: 10,999
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by iforyou
lol sounds like you are a blackberry guy
or, a guy who likes physical, analog controls.
Old 08-21-2015 | 06:56 PM
  #5753  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Originally Posted by iforyou
lol sounds like you are a blackberry guy


Originally Posted by srika
or, a guy who likes physical, analog controls.
Well, yeah. The analog controls are much better than the touchscreen ones for certain buttons.
Old 08-21-2015 | 07:10 PM
  #5754  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,321
Likes: 2,813
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
WTF are you guys talking about?

The physical volume buttons are here...


Old 08-21-2015 | 07:21 PM
  #5755  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Originally Posted by Mizouse
WTF are you guys talking about?

The physical volume buttons are here...


It doesn't seem like a physical button in this latest picture that was released.

Old 08-21-2015 | 08:08 PM
  #5756  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,321
Likes: 2,813
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
The steering wheel
Old 08-21-2015 | 08:18 PM
  #5757  
crazyasiantl's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 12,594
Likes: 596
From: Clovis CA
What about the vent placement guys?
Old 08-21-2015 | 08:25 PM
  #5758  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,005
Likes: 10,999
From: Chicago
What about door latches??
Old 08-24-2015 | 07:17 AM
  #5759  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
That does not look like a $150K interior.
Old 08-24-2015 | 07:20 AM
  #5760  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
Originally Posted by charliemike
That does not look like a $150K interior.
that's what I said back a couple pages ago.

the NSX lovers were like; it's simple and elegant.

fack, if im spending $150k.....


Quick Reply: Acura: NSX News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.