Monthly Car Sales news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2010, 08:42 AM
  #1201  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
People on this board for the most part represent the enthusiast comminity. In which Acura is still choosing to pretty much ignore.

But ya, imagine if they had got the stying\size on the TL right. I truly believe they've be selling 5-6k units per month and be much farther up the sales charts.
I agree. The conversation on this board (and most others I participate on) are definitely skewed to the boy racer perspective. That's not to be meant to be a put down. I was a "boy racer" once and it's a perfectly legitimate perspective and a significant percent of the car buyers. But it's far from the majority of car buyers. In fact, given the fact that 50% of the drivers in the world are female and 2/3 of the male car buyers are over 40, we can pretty much guess that the topic of RWD/FWD, weight distribution, torque, horse power, etc. is on the minds of AT BEST about 15% of the car buyers walking into a dealership.

So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
Old 08-04-2010, 09:33 AM
  #1202  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
I agree. The conversation on this board (and most others I participate on) are definitely skewed to the boy racer perspective. That's not to be meant to be a put down. I was a "boy racer" once and it's a perfectly legitimate perspective and a significant percent of the car buyers. But it's far from the majority of car buyers. In fact, given the fact that 50% of the drivers in the world are female and 2/3 of the male car buyers are over 40, we can pretty much guess that the topic of RWD/FWD, weight distribution, torque, horse power, etc. is on the minds of AT BEST about 15% of the car buyers walking into a dealership.

So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
Agreed, on all points. It can be difficult at times to remember that your own opinion and perspective isn't necessarily shared by the majority. I know I think I'm always right. And I'll continue to bitch and scream until I see a MT coupled with the V6 in the TSX.
Old 08-04-2010, 09:43 AM
  #1203  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
The FMC can't come soon enough for the Insight.

Prius 14,102 -29.2%
Insight 1,858 -22%
HS 165 (stop sale)
Old 08-04-2010, 10:10 AM
  #1204  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Agreed, on all points. It can be difficult at times to remember that your own opinion and perspective isn't necessarily shared by the majority. I know I think I'm always right. And I'll continue to bitch and scream until I see a MT coupled with the V6 in the TSX.
Oh yea, MT, forgot to add that one to the list

In all seriousness, I think it's a legitimate complaint too. The TSX is geared towards a more youthful buyer who IS probably in their 20's. To help sales, they can't add that configuration fast enough IMO. No sure what the hold up is.

But isn't that's one of Acura's biggest problems from a business perspective? They are not moving fast enough to keep up. When they do act, their products are very good (putting the debate about style aside). If Honda took this brand more seriously it could probably be more than an also-ran. And by taking it seriously, I mean they need to do things to satisfy the "enthusiast" as we hear all the time on here, but they also need to expand the lineup in a significant way and satisfy the more mature buyer which probably makes up the majority of their business now. To compete with Infiniti, let alone Lexus and the germans, they must have a coupe and convertible and 200+ inch full size sedan to replace the mid sized RL. I'm sure a replacement for the NSX would help the brand image as well but I'd do the other models first and then worry about a roadster later.
Old 08-04-2010, 12:28 PM
  #1205  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
danielgr at TOV posted a great analysis regarding the TL situation. Go over there and have a read.

Basically he's saying that it's unrealistic to expect the TL to sell as well as 2g and 3g TL. Back then, the TL started at 28k and top of the line was like 33k for the 2g. The 2004 TL was in the 33-35k range. Then the new IS, new G, new C class, new 3 series came alone in 2006-2007. That immediately had an effect on the TL. The TL went from 42000 units in 2006 to 35000 in 2007, to 27000 in 2008. Then after that, there's the new CTS and new A4 as well. The 4G TL has gotten much bigger too, and MUCH MORE expensive. What's more? The new 2G TSX has become/replaced the 2G/3G TL, especially with the new V6 model.

Looking at things this way, I don't think the TL is doing that bad at all. Of course, Acura could have done better.
To me all that says is the others stepped up their game more than Acura did.
Old 08-04-2010, 12:52 PM
  #1206  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
Oh yea, MT, forgot to add that one to the list

In all seriousness, I think it's a legitimate complaint too. The TSX is geared towards a more youthful buyer who IS probably in their 20's. To help sales, they can't add that configuration fast enough IMO. No sure what the hold up is.
Probably costs. Since the V6 is for North America only, adding another trim level will just run up costs. And I'm sure the figure they won't sell enough to re-coup. IMO they should bite the bullet and accept those loses (or less profits from the TSX) and satisfy those looking for MT.

But isn't that's one of Acura's biggest problems from a business perspective? They are not moving fast enough to keep up. When they do act, their products are very good (putting the debate about style aside). If Honda took this brand more seriously it could probably be more than an also-ran. And by taking it seriously, I mean they need to do things to satisfy the "enthusiast" as we hear all the time on here, but they also need to expand the lineup in a significant way and satisfy the more mature buyer which probably makes up the majority of their business now. To compete with Infiniti, let alone Lexus and the germans, they must have a coupe and convertible and 200+ inch full size sedan to replace the mid sized RL. I'm sure a replacement for the NSX would help the brand image as well but I'd do the other models first and then worry about a roadster later.
Agreed, but going by what the CEO has been saying lately, I don't think any of those types of products are coming.
Old 08-04-2010, 02:55 PM
  #1207  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
^ It should sell close to ES levels - it has the same background (based on the high volume mid sized sedan) and probably the same customer base (people moving up from the pedestrian make to the luxury make). Acura simply screwed up - too big, too expensive, too ugly.
That's the problem. The ES has been on the market for so long and has established itself as a comfortable entry level luxury cruiser. The 2g TL and 3g TL on the other hand were known as affordable entry level sporty and luxury sedan. The 4G TL FWD isn't going that direction anymore, and like you are saying, it's similar to the ES now. If people want something like the ES, they would go for the ES, not the TL since the ES is better known in that area and the Lexus brand name helps a lot too.

If Acura toned down the styling of the TL, downsize it a bit, and make it sportier, then I think it will sell better. However, if Acura goes that route, what will differentiate the TSX and the TL? See what I'm getting at here?

Acura is in the middle of reforming/restructuring its product line up. In the short term, I think most people will think Acura models are confusing and consequently think they are lost in direction and think that they are not competitive.

Originally Posted by fsttyms1
To me all that says is the others stepped up their game more than Acura did.
Yes, I think so. It's like school....improving from 90% to 95% doesn't look as good as improving from 50% to 80%.
Old 08-04-2010, 03:10 PM
  #1208  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
That's the problem. The ES has been on the market for so long and has established itself as a comfortable entry level luxury cruiser. The 2g TL and 3g TL on the other hand were known as affordable entry level sporty and luxury sedan. The 4G TL FWD isn't going that direction anymore, and like you are saying, it's similar to the ES now. If people want something like the ES, they would go for the ES, not the TL since the ES is better known in that area and the Lexus brand name helps a lot too.

If Acura toned down the styling of the TL, downsize it a bit, and make it sportier, then I think it will sell better. However, if Acura goes that route, what will differentiate the TSX and the TL? See what I'm getting at here?


I still dont think you can really compare the TL fwd very much to the ES, its still sportier and not as quiet as the lexus.

Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
Old 08-04-2010, 06:12 PM
  #1209  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I still dont think you can really compare the TL fwd very much to the ES, its still sportier and not as quiet as the lexus.

Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
I think you could. Personalities might be a little different but the room, pricing, power, and market is very similar.

Just like you can compare Altimas and Camrys even though their personalities are very different.
Old 08-04-2010, 06:32 PM
  #1210  
Pro
 
JD23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
danielgr at TOV posted a great analysis regarding the TL situation. Go over there and have a read.

Basically he's saying that it's unrealistic to expect the TL to sell as well as 2g and 3g TL. Back then, the TL started at 28k and top of the line was like 33k for the 2g. The 2004 TL was in the 33-35k range. Then the new IS, new G, new C class, new 3 series came alone in 2006-2007. That immediately had an effect on the TL. The TL went from 42000 units in 2006 to 35000 in 2007, to 27000 in 2008. Then after that, there's the new CTS and new A4 as well. The 4G TL has gotten much bigger too, and MUCH MORE expensive. What's more? The new 2G TSX has become/replaced the 2G/3G TL, especially with the new V6 model.

Looking at things this way, I don't think the TL is doing that bad at all. Of course, Acura could have done better.
The current FWD non-tech TL is only about $3000 more than the 2004 TL, which amounts to an annual price increase of a little less than 2%. At the low end, there is very little price increase from 3G to 4G, but I do agree that there was a significant increase at the high end of the price range, from $38,500 for the 2008 Type S to $43,000 for the 2009 SH-AWD with tech.

Aside from the increase in size and unpopular styling, I think the most significant difference between the 3G and the 4G is drivetrain competitiveness. When the 3G TL was released, the 258 hp J32 was arguably better than anything offered by the 3 series, G35, A4 and CTS. Although the J37 is not a bad powerplant, it is bested by engines offered by the 335, G37 and IS350, and is similar in performance to several other engines. Furthermore, the 5AT went from acceptable in 2003 to archaic in 2008. Acura has to offer something better than pedestrian powerplants if it is going to overcome its styling handicap.
Old 08-04-2010, 08:10 PM
  #1211  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
To me all that says is the others stepped up their game more than Acura did.
thank you. and btw danielgr @ TOV is one of the biggest Honda pacifist/quintessential fanboy, so I would not take one of his "analysis" with a grain of salt.
Old 08-04-2010, 08:16 PM
  #1212  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,887
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I still dont think you can really compare the TL fwd very much to the ES, its still sportier and not as quiet as the lexus.
I believe you have to compare them on paper as both are notable entries in the same segment. But do I get the gist of your post in that two decidedly different types of buyers opt for one or the other between these two.
Old 08-05-2010, 02:16 AM
  #1213  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Canada July 2010 Sales

Ford: +1.6% to 27,199
General Motors: +22.4% to 23,902
Chrysler: +40% to 22,254
Toyota: -22.8% to 13,681
Hyundai: +9.7% to 11,503
Honda: -10.2% to 10,184
Nissan: +10.1% to 7,525
Mazda: +12% to 7,268
Kia: +10.6% to 5,652
Volkswagen: -3.4% to 3,881
Subaru: +28.1% to 2,336
BMW: -12.1% to 2,107
Mercedes-Benz: +6.3%% to 2,102
Mitsubishi: -12% to 1,672
Acura: -13% to 1,431
Lexus: -20.6% to 1,201
Audi: +46% to 1,200
Suzuki: -19.3% to 935
Infiniti: +13% to 793
Volvo: +20.5% to 712
Mini: -8.4% to 405
Porsche: +24% to 248
Land Rover: +43.4% to 185
smart: -37.9% to 180
Jaguar: -11.1% to 80
Toyota/Lexus suffered the greatest drop in sales than any other manufacturer. Toyota lost the most out of all mainstream brands and Lexus lost the most out of all luxury brands.
Old 08-05-2010, 03:51 AM
  #1214  
Evil Mazda Driver
 
PortlandRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 37
Posts: 11,212
Received 174 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
Yes it is a still on a stop sale. It has been over a month and Lexus has shown itself to be incapable of providing a solution to the problems, one of many. Even when the car was for sale though Lexus was giving them away for Camry-like lease deals so in reality, consumers are not affected by this, stop sale or not cause nobody wants to buy one either way.
So this explains the lot literally packed with HS250s outside my Lexus dealer. They probably have 60 or 70 of them crammed in there, just sitting getting sun tans. I can totally understand it, though. My mom got one as a loaner when her RX was in for service and my God....what a piece of crap. I didn't drive it but was unimpressed with the plastic and even fit and finish seemed sub-par, especially for a Lexus. My mom told me the thing was essentially impossible to drive smoothly. No wonder they aren't selling.
Old 08-05-2010, 07:13 AM
  #1215  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,309
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was.
They had the global market in mind when they designed the Euro Accord. For that, the Euro Accord had to grow - in the world outside of the US, the Euro Accord is a large sedan.

With the platform whoring every maker is using, there are only so many way you can change things. Until the TL gets divorced from the USDM Accord platform, its sized will be dictated by it.

Last edited by biker; 08-05-2010 at 07:17 AM.
Old 08-05-2010, 10:25 AM
  #1216  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
Toyota/Lexus suffered the greatest drop in sales than any other manufacturer. Toyota lost the most out of all mainstream brands and Lexus lost the most out of all luxury brands.
Wow. Greatest drop in sales of any manufacturer and yet still nearly 4k more units than Honda!

I bet Toyoda stays up at night sweating about their "Canadian" sales!!!
Old 08-05-2010, 10:47 AM
  #1217  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by biker
They had the global market in mind when they designed the Euro Accord. For that, the Euro Accord had to grow - in the world outside of the US, the Euro Accord is a large sedan.

With the platform whoring every maker is using, there are only so many way you can change things. Until the TL gets divorced from the USDM Accord platform, its sized will be dictated by it.
It's not platform whoring, it's badge engineering by Honda. They could have made a smaller car than the Euro accord based on the same platform, but that actually requires more work than rebadging.

Look at Nissan's FM platform. the new 370Z is actually smaller/lighter than the previous gen, while the same platform can handle large car duty for the fuga/M.

How can Honda's size range be so small for each platform, yet Nissan's be so wide?

Last edited by mrdeeno; 08-05-2010 at 10:49 AM.
Old 08-05-2010, 11:42 AM
  #1218  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
It's not platform whoring, it's badge engineering by Honda. They could have made a smaller car than the Euro accord based on the same platform, but that actually requires more work than rebadging.

Look at Nissan's FM platform. the new 370Z is actually smaller/lighter than the previous gen, while the same platform can handle large car duty for the fuga/M.

How can Honda's size range be so small for each platform, yet Nissan's be so wide?
You're right. Sharing a platform is not as limiting as it sounds. Acura built the TL that size because that was what they wanted. It could have been smaller and still been on the same global platform. Years ago a "platform" truly meant something physical and was actually chassis sharing. Nowadays I think it's much more component based and a "platform" is really nothing more than the shared collective specs and components which define the drive train, suspension, primary structural components for the underbody, etc. oif a family of cars It's much more modular than the "old days"
Old 08-05-2010, 12:49 PM
  #1219  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
thank you. and btw danielgr @ TOV is one of the biggest Honda pacifist/quintessential fanboy, so I would not take one of his "analysis" with a grain of salt.
Doesn't that mean that you should take what he says with a grain of salt?
Old 08-05-2010, 01:28 PM
  #1220  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I still dont think you can really compare the TL fwd very much to the ES, its still sportier and not as quiet as the lexus.

Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
TSX is not bigger than Audi A4/G37. and next BMW 3/IS will increase in length.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
Old 08-05-2010, 02:17 PM
  #1221  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
Toyota/Lexus suffered the greatest drop in sales than any other manufacturer. Toyota lost the most out of all mainstream brands and Lexus lost the most out of all luxury brands.
Holy crap, I never knew that Canadians buy domestic in those numbers...


The big three are still the big three here!
Old 08-05-2010, 02:39 PM
  #1222  
hail to the victors
 
chungkopi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Genesis dont have $40k transaction price. On used car lot its selling price is less than TL. and since TL sale volume is 50% larger than Genesis. it means its avg price is higher than Genesis.

Car with 175 mile on odo is $33K asking.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/1876423329.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/1874079060.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/ctd/1873394906.html



even 2010 with 10miles on odo is $39k asking. and it is V8 comparable to Sh-AWD. It is asking not the transaction price.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/ctd/1869158979.html
2010 Hyundai GENESIS #8948, 10 miles, Automatic, Fuel Injected, - $38999 (burlingame)
VIN: KMHGC4DF3AU099804
Warranty: Yes
Stock #: 8948
Miles: 10
Exterior Color: White Satin Pearl
Interior Color: Cashmere
Automatic, Fuel Injected, 8 Cyl., 4.6, 4 Dr Sedan
lol at craigslist.

I misinterpreted what Krafcik said. He said over half of Genesis sold is over 40k. meaning avg. transaction will most likely be in high 30's. not bad at all for a non korean luxury brand.

...shows that Genesis has residual values on par with the Mercedes E-Class and better than the Lexus GS, BMW 5 Series, Cadillac CTS and STS, Lincoln MKS and Infiniti M. And the product mix has been incredibly rich, with over half of all Genesis' sold to date going out the door with sticker prices over $40,000. Our V8 engine mix runs around 45 percent — the highest optional V8 engine mix in the segment.
http://www.insideline.com/hyundai/eq...n-krafcik.html

so p

Last edited by chungkopi; 08-05-2010 at 02:49 PM.
Old 08-05-2010, 02:50 PM
  #1223  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by chungkopi
I misinterpreted what Krafcik said. He said over half of Genesis sold is over 40k.



http://www.insideline.com/hyundai/eq...n-krafcik.html
stick price is not transaction price. 50% of 2300 is 1100 sales of V8. with true delta price of $37K for V8.
Old 08-05-2010, 03:03 PM
  #1224  
hail to the victors
 
chungkopi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
stick price is not transaction price. 50% of 2300 is 1100 sales of V8. with true delta price of $37K for V8.

just browsed through genesis priced paid forum in edmunds. 36-39k avg transaction price is the ball park. it's definitely not low to mid 30's. so comparing genesis to CC(forgot who did) is ridiculous. different audience and almost 5k more than CC's avg.

for v6 - 33k to 37k (v6 with tech package is most popular)
for v8 - 37k to 40k

Last edited by chungkopi; 08-05-2010 at 03:12 PM.
Old 08-05-2010, 05:52 PM
  #1225  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
TSX is not bigger than Audi A4/G37. and next BMW 3/IS will increase in length.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
The TSX should have stayed small and nimble like Gen 1! Not the bloated damn near the size of the TL car it is The TL should have stayed 2g/3g size, not this large version it is and competed with the 3 series. The RL should have been the 5 series size and remained that size as it in no way can compete with the LS/7 series.
Old 08-05-2010, 06:22 PM
  #1226  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,172
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
TSX is not bigger than Audi A4/G37. and next BMW 3/IS will increase in length.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
Pricewisely, the TSX is being compared with the A3, 1-series. The TL with the A4, 3-series, C-class, Infiniti-G, Lexus-IS. The RL with the A6, 5-series, E-class, Infiniti-M, Lexus-GS.

When the days come the TSX was being compared with the A4/3-series/C-class,G, IS; and the TL with the A6/5-series/E-class/M/GS; Acura would be very, very, very, very happy because then it had succeeded to become a true luxury brand.

So any comparison of the TSX with the A4/G37/3/IS, and the TL with the 5/A6, means absolutely nothing.
Old 08-05-2010, 06:47 PM
  #1227  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Pricewisely, the TSX is being compared with the A3, 1-series. The TL with the A4, 3-series, C-class, Infiniti-G, Lexus-IS. The RL with the A6, 5-series, E-class, Infiniti-M, Lexus-GS.

When the days come the TSX was being compared with the A4/3-series/C-class,G, IS; and the TL with the A6/5-series/E-class/M/GS; Acura would be very, very, very, very happy because then it had succeeded to become a true luxury brand.

So any comparison of the TSX with the A4/G37/3/IS, and the TL with the 5/A6, means absolutely nothing.
Honda Euro Accord is pretty competive with 4cylinder of A4/BMW 3 and surpass IS in diesel engine refinement.
Honda hasnt updated its transmission and engine line up for V6. once it is done in 2012-2013. it would be better. I dont see any reason TSX-SH-AWD pulling less than 0.99g. much more than BMW M3. once BMW 3 grow in size it has to implement AWD to be competitive.
Old 08-05-2010, 07:47 PM
  #1228  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Honda Euro Accord is pretty competive with 4cylinder of A4/BMW 3 and surpass IS in diesel engine refinement.
Honda hasnt updated its transmission and engine line up for V6. once it is done in 2012-2013. it would be better. I dont see any reason TSX-SH-AWD pulling less than 0.99g. much more than BMW M3. once BMW 3 grow in size it has to implement AWD to be competitive.
I guess we've gone beyond the realm of mag-racing and entered the zone of vapor-racing.

I heard the 2012-2013 ford focus is gonna pull 1.9g on the skidpad!

Whatdya say to that!
Old 08-05-2010, 08:29 PM
  #1229  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
I guess we've gone beyond the realm of mag-racing and entered the zone of vapor-racing.

I heard the 2012-2013 ford focus is gonna pull 1.9g on the skidpad!

Whatdya say to that!
Ford has $35b debt on its balance sheet and it is due 2012. and has already shed most of its Premier auto group. Ford will be mostly competing with Hyundai. as its Fusion hybrid sales will decline with Sonata Hybrid.
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
Old 08-05-2010, 09:21 PM
  #1230  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Old 08-05-2010, 09:29 PM
  #1231  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,828
Received 4,037 Likes on 2,512 Posts
Interesting how the S-class has fallen to 4th place behind the LS, 7-series, and Panamera. And the S-class is only a couple years old in design.....

And Audi is doing very well with the A5/S5, really surprised the Vette sells fewer than the Audi. I'd bet GM is working overtime now getting the Vette back into competition it's sales numbers are off by almost 3 to 1 from 2006. The C6 is a great performer but the interior still needs some improvement for a car in it's price range.

Slightly old article but still applies today

http://www.autoobserver.com/2010/01/...s-sputter.html
Old 08-05-2010, 09:34 PM
  #1232  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Ford has $35b debt on its balance sheet and it is due 2012. and has already shed most of its Premier auto group. Ford will be mostly competing with Hyundai. as its Fusion hybrid sales will decline with Sonata Hybrid.
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
Old 08-05-2010, 09:40 PM
  #1233  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
Interesting how the S-class has fallen to 4th place behind the LS, 7-series, and Panamera. And the S-class is only a couple years old in design.....

And Audi is doing very well with the A5/S5, really surprised the Vette sells fewer than the Audi. I'd bet GM is working overtime now getting the Vette back into competition it's sales numbers are off by almost 3 to 1 from 2006. The C6 is a great performer but the interior still needs some improvement for a car in it's price range.

Slightly old article but still applies today

http://www.autoobserver.com/2010/01/...s-sputter.html
The S-Class was first unveiled in 2005 and went on sale in 2006, so it's definately in the latter years of its cycle.

The fourth place drop is surprising, nevertheless.
Old 08-05-2010, 09:54 PM
  #1234  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,828
Received 4,037 Likes on 2,512 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
I agree. The conversation on this board (and most others I participate on) are definitely skewed to the boy racer perspective. That's not to be meant to be a put down. I was a "boy racer" once and it's a perfectly legitimate perspective and a significant percent of the car buyers. But it's far from the majority of car buyers. In fact, given the fact that 50% of the drivers in the world are female and 2/3 of the male car buyers are over 40, we can pretty much guess that the topic of RWD/FWD, weight distribution, torque, horse power, etc. is on the minds of AT BEST about 15% of the car buyers walking into a dealership.

So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
Oh so true. Many times while reading the threads on comments on what people think the auto manufactures should design and produce brings me back to the Simpson's episode where Homer designs a car for his brother's company and winds up ruining the business.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_Brot...re_Art_Thou%3F
Old 08-05-2010, 10:11 PM
  #1235  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
LS no longer competes with S class. S Class transaction prices are closer to $90K.
LS is more in $60k to $65k region. I would not be surprized if some dealers are distributing even cheaper than that.
Car is too bland and handles like boat. Only saving grace is all the latest technology like 8speed auto, DI, auto parking etc.


BMW 7 has introduced cheaper 6 six cylinder.
Lexus cannot compete beyond $70k price as LX sales have fallen way too low once its priced crossed $70k. Lexus is not a brand that is going upmarket.
Old 08-05-2010, 10:14 PM
  #1236  
Evil Mazda Driver
 
PortlandRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 37
Posts: 11,212
Received 174 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Ford has $35b debt on its balance sheet and it is due 2012. and has already shed most of its Premier auto group. Ford will be mostly competing with Hyundai. as its Fusion hybrid sales will decline with Sonata Hybrid.
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
Just when I thought you had run out of stupid things to say....
Old 08-05-2010, 10:44 PM
  #1237  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone just hand me moderator power so I can silence this fuck and get my powers revoked?

This is getting old and it's obvious trolling. I love the mods here but I know of no other forum (though I haven't visited many) where the moderators would put up with someone so widely disliked.
Old 08-05-2010, 10:53 PM
  #1238  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
Oh so true. Many times while reading the threads on comments on what people think the auto manufactures should design and produce brings me back to the Simpson's episode where Homer designs a car for his brother's company and winds up ruining the business.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_Brot...re_Art_Thou%3F
There is nothing being said here that hasn't been said every month by the same people for years.
Old 08-06-2010, 06:28 AM
  #1239  
Safety Car
 
TSX69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 4,785
Received 1,395 Likes on 700 Posts
Post Trolling

Atho I do not always agree or even understand what SSFTSX says most of the time, I would not consider her/him a troll ... there are others on here that I think more deserve that title. His/her posts are usually mature/respectful & on topic (@ least @ the beginning) ... & s/he seems to actually be a fan of Acura on what is supposed to "the unofficial Acura enthusiast resource". Trolls, to me, would be the people who are on here just to make snide comments or cheap shots @ Honda/Acura (even when they have nothing to do w/ topic on hand), insult/flame others etc etc

Back on topic:
The Top of July 2010
1. Ford F-Series 50,449
2. Toyota Camry 35,056
3. Chevrolet Silverado 34,664
4. Toyota Corolla 27,345
5. Honda Accord 25,386
6. Honda Civic 23,902
7. Dodge Ram 20,138
8. Chevrolet Malibu 20,458
9. Honda CR-V 20,058
10. Nissan Altima 18,275
Old 08-06-2010, 06:39 AM
  #1240  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Doesn't that mean that you should take what he says with a grain of salt?
yes, I was typing at night and it came out all wrong. but you got the gist.


Quick Reply: Monthly Car Sales news



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.