Monthly Car Sales news
#1201
Go Big Blue!
People on this board for the most part represent the enthusiast comminity. In which Acura is still choosing to pretty much ignore.
But ya, imagine if they had got the stying\size on the TL right. I truly believe they've be selling 5-6k units per month and be much farther up the sales charts.
But ya, imagine if they had got the stying\size on the TL right. I truly believe they've be selling 5-6k units per month and be much farther up the sales charts.
So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
#1202
Senior Moderator
I agree. The conversation on this board (and most others I participate on) are definitely skewed to the boy racer perspective. That's not to be meant to be a put down. I was a "boy racer" once and it's a perfectly legitimate perspective and a significant percent of the car buyers. But it's far from the majority of car buyers. In fact, given the fact that 50% of the drivers in the world are female and 2/3 of the male car buyers are over 40, we can pretty much guess that the topic of RWD/FWD, weight distribution, torque, horse power, etc. is on the minds of AT BEST about 15% of the car buyers walking into a dealership.
So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
#1204
Go Big Blue!
In all seriousness, I think it's a legitimate complaint too. The TSX is geared towards a more youthful buyer who IS probably in their 20's. To help sales, they can't add that configuration fast enough IMO. No sure what the hold up is.
But isn't that's one of Acura's biggest problems from a business perspective? They are not moving fast enough to keep up. When they do act, their products are very good (putting the debate about style aside). If Honda took this brand more seriously it could probably be more than an also-ran. And by taking it seriously, I mean they need to do things to satisfy the "enthusiast" as we hear all the time on here, but they also need to expand the lineup in a significant way and satisfy the more mature buyer which probably makes up the majority of their business now. To compete with Infiniti, let alone Lexus and the germans, they must have a coupe and convertible and 200+ inch full size sedan to replace the mid sized RL. I'm sure a replacement for the NSX would help the brand image as well but I'd do the other models first and then worry about a roadster later.
#1205
Senior Moderator
danielgr at TOV posted a great analysis regarding the TL situation. Go over there and have a read.
Basically he's saying that it's unrealistic to expect the TL to sell as well as 2g and 3g TL. Back then, the TL started at 28k and top of the line was like 33k for the 2g. The 2004 TL was in the 33-35k range. Then the new IS, new G, new C class, new 3 series came alone in 2006-2007. That immediately had an effect on the TL. The TL went from 42000 units in 2006 to 35000 in 2007, to 27000 in 2008. Then after that, there's the new CTS and new A4 as well. The 4G TL has gotten much bigger too, and MUCH MORE expensive. What's more? The new 2G TSX has become/replaced the 2G/3G TL, especially with the new V6 model.
Looking at things this way, I don't think the TL is doing that bad at all. Of course, Acura could have done better.
Basically he's saying that it's unrealistic to expect the TL to sell as well as 2g and 3g TL. Back then, the TL started at 28k and top of the line was like 33k for the 2g. The 2004 TL was in the 33-35k range. Then the new IS, new G, new C class, new 3 series came alone in 2006-2007. That immediately had an effect on the TL. The TL went from 42000 units in 2006 to 35000 in 2007, to 27000 in 2008. Then after that, there's the new CTS and new A4 as well. The 4G TL has gotten much bigger too, and MUCH MORE expensive. What's more? The new 2G TSX has become/replaced the 2G/3G TL, especially with the new V6 model.
Looking at things this way, I don't think the TL is doing that bad at all. Of course, Acura could have done better.
#1206
Senior Moderator
Oh yea, MT, forgot to add that one to the list
In all seriousness, I think it's a legitimate complaint too. The TSX is geared towards a more youthful buyer who IS probably in their 20's. To help sales, they can't add that configuration fast enough IMO. No sure what the hold up is.
In all seriousness, I think it's a legitimate complaint too. The TSX is geared towards a more youthful buyer who IS probably in their 20's. To help sales, they can't add that configuration fast enough IMO. No sure what the hold up is.
But isn't that's one of Acura's biggest problems from a business perspective? They are not moving fast enough to keep up. When they do act, their products are very good (putting the debate about style aside). If Honda took this brand more seriously it could probably be more than an also-ran. And by taking it seriously, I mean they need to do things to satisfy the "enthusiast" as we hear all the time on here, but they also need to expand the lineup in a significant way and satisfy the more mature buyer which probably makes up the majority of their business now. To compete with Infiniti, let alone Lexus and the germans, they must have a coupe and convertible and 200+ inch full size sedan to replace the mid sized RL. I'm sure a replacement for the NSX would help the brand image as well but I'd do the other models first and then worry about a roadster later.
#1207
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes
on
518 Posts
If Acura toned down the styling of the TL, downsize it a bit, and make it sportier, then I think it will sell better. However, if Acura goes that route, what will differentiate the TSX and the TL? See what I'm getting at here?
Acura is in the middle of reforming/restructuring its product line up. In the short term, I think most people will think Acura models are confusing and consequently think they are lost in direction and think that they are not competitive.
Yes, I think so. It's like school....improving from 90% to 95% doesn't look as good as improving from 50% to 80%.
#1208
Senior Moderator
That's the problem. The ES has been on the market for so long and has established itself as a comfortable entry level luxury cruiser. The 2g TL and 3g TL on the other hand were known as affordable entry level sporty and luxury sedan. The 4G TL FWD isn't going that direction anymore, and like you are saying, it's similar to the ES now. If people want something like the ES, they would go for the ES, not the TL since the ES is better known in that area and the Lexus brand name helps a lot too.
If Acura toned down the styling of the TL, downsize it a bit, and make it sportier, then I think it will sell better. However, if Acura goes that route, what will differentiate the TSX and the TL? See what I'm getting at here?
If Acura toned down the styling of the TL, downsize it a bit, and make it sportier, then I think it will sell better. However, if Acura goes that route, what will differentiate the TSX and the TL? See what I'm getting at here?
Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
#1209
I still dont think you can really compare the TL fwd very much to the ES, its still sportier and not as quiet as the lexus.
Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
Just like you can compare Altimas and Camrys even though their personalities are very different.
#1210
danielgr at TOV posted a great analysis regarding the TL situation. Go over there and have a read.
Basically he's saying that it's unrealistic to expect the TL to sell as well as 2g and 3g TL. Back then, the TL started at 28k and top of the line was like 33k for the 2g. The 2004 TL was in the 33-35k range. Then the new IS, new G, new C class, new 3 series came alone in 2006-2007. That immediately had an effect on the TL. The TL went from 42000 units in 2006 to 35000 in 2007, to 27000 in 2008. Then after that, there's the new CTS and new A4 as well. The 4G TL has gotten much bigger too, and MUCH MORE expensive. What's more? The new 2G TSX has become/replaced the 2G/3G TL, especially with the new V6 model.
Looking at things this way, I don't think the TL is doing that bad at all. Of course, Acura could have done better.
Basically he's saying that it's unrealistic to expect the TL to sell as well as 2g and 3g TL. Back then, the TL started at 28k and top of the line was like 33k for the 2g. The 2004 TL was in the 33-35k range. Then the new IS, new G, new C class, new 3 series came alone in 2006-2007. That immediately had an effect on the TL. The TL went from 42000 units in 2006 to 35000 in 2007, to 27000 in 2008. Then after that, there's the new CTS and new A4 as well. The 4G TL has gotten much bigger too, and MUCH MORE expensive. What's more? The new 2G TSX has become/replaced the 2G/3G TL, especially with the new V6 model.
Looking at things this way, I don't think the TL is doing that bad at all. Of course, Acura could have done better.
Aside from the increase in size and unpopular styling, I think the most significant difference between the 3G and the 4G is drivetrain competitiveness. When the 3G TL was released, the 258 hp J32 was arguably better than anything offered by the 3 series, G35, A4 and CTS. Although the J37 is not a bad powerplant, it is bested by engines offered by the 335, G37 and IS350, and is similar in performance to several other engines. Furthermore, the 5AT went from acceptable in 2003 to archaic in 2008. Acura has to offer something better than pedestrian powerplants if it is going to overcome its styling handicap.
#1211
#1212
Senior Moderator
I believe you have to compare them on paper as both are notable entries in the same segment. But do I get the gist of your post in that two decidedly different types of buyers opt for one or the other between these two.
#1213
Honda Fanboy
Canada July 2010 Sales
Ford: +1.6% to 27,199
General Motors: +22.4% to 23,902
Chrysler: +40% to 22,254
Toyota: -22.8% to 13,681
Hyundai: +9.7% to 11,503
Honda: -10.2% to 10,184
Nissan: +10.1% to 7,525
Mazda: +12% to 7,268
Kia: +10.6% to 5,652
Volkswagen: -3.4% to 3,881
Subaru: +28.1% to 2,336
BMW: -12.1% to 2,107
Mercedes-Benz: +6.3%% to 2,102
Mitsubishi: -12% to 1,672
Acura: -13% to 1,431
Lexus: -20.6% to 1,201
Audi: +46% to 1,200
Suzuki: -19.3% to 935
Infiniti: +13% to 793
Volvo: +20.5% to 712
Mini: -8.4% to 405
Porsche: +24% to 248
Land Rover: +43.4% to 185
smart: -37.9% to 180
Jaguar: -11.1% to 80
General Motors: +22.4% to 23,902
Chrysler: +40% to 22,254
Toyota: -22.8% to 13,681
Hyundai: +9.7% to 11,503
Honda: -10.2% to 10,184
Nissan: +10.1% to 7,525
Mazda: +12% to 7,268
Kia: +10.6% to 5,652
Volkswagen: -3.4% to 3,881
Subaru: +28.1% to 2,336
BMW: -12.1% to 2,107
Mercedes-Benz: +6.3%% to 2,102
Mitsubishi: -12% to 1,672
Acura: -13% to 1,431
Lexus: -20.6% to 1,201
Audi: +46% to 1,200
Suzuki: -19.3% to 935
Infiniti: +13% to 793
Volvo: +20.5% to 712
Mini: -8.4% to 405
Porsche: +24% to 248
Land Rover: +43.4% to 185
smart: -37.9% to 180
Jaguar: -11.1% to 80
#1214
Evil Mazda Driver
Yes it is a still on a stop sale. It has been over a month and Lexus has shown itself to be incapable of providing a solution to the problems, one of many. Even when the car was for sale though Lexus was giving them away for Camry-like lease deals so in reality, consumers are not affected by this, stop sale or not cause nobody wants to buy one either way.
#1215
Race Director
With the platform whoring every maker is using, there are only so many way you can change things. Until the TL gets divorced from the USDM Accord platform, its sized will be dictated by it.
Last edited by biker; 08-05-2010 at 07:17 AM.
#1216
Punk Rocker
I bet Toyoda stays up at night sweating about their "Canadian" sales!!!
#1217
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
They had the global market in mind when they designed the Euro Accord. For that, the Euro Accord had to grow - in the world outside of the US, the Euro Accord is a large sedan.
With the platform whoring every maker is using, there are only so many way you can change things. Until the TL gets divorced from the USDM Accord platform, its sized will be dictated by it.
With the platform whoring every maker is using, there are only so many way you can change things. Until the TL gets divorced from the USDM Accord platform, its sized will be dictated by it.
Look at Nissan's FM platform. the new 370Z is actually smaller/lighter than the previous gen, while the same platform can handle large car duty for the fuga/M.
How can Honda's size range be so small for each platform, yet Nissan's be so wide?
Last edited by mrdeeno; 08-05-2010 at 10:49 AM.
#1218
Go Big Blue!
It's not platform whoring, it's badge engineering by Honda. They could have made a smaller car than the Euro accord based on the same platform, but that actually requires more work than rebadging.
Look at Nissan's FM platform. the new 370Z is actually smaller/lighter than the previous gen, while the same platform can handle large car duty for the fuga/M.
How can Honda's size range be so small for each platform, yet Nissan's be so wide?
Look at Nissan's FM platform. the new 370Z is actually smaller/lighter than the previous gen, while the same platform can handle large car duty for the fuga/M.
How can Honda's size range be so small for each platform, yet Nissan's be so wide?
#1219
#1220
I still dont think you can really compare the TL fwd very much to the ES, its still sportier and not as quiet as the lexus.
Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
Also i see no reason they had to make the TSX larger like they did. They should have kept it smaller like it was. If people wanted something a little larger they could have gotten the TL (which they shouldnt have made larger) Larger should have been to the RL.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
#1221
I'm the Firestarter
The big three are still the big three here!
#1222
hail to the victors
Genesis dont have $40k transaction price. On used car lot its selling price is less than TL. and since TL sale volume is 50% larger than Genesis. it means its avg price is higher than Genesis.
Car with 175 mile on odo is $33K asking.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/1876423329.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/1874079060.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/ctd/1873394906.html
even 2010 with 10miles on odo is $39k asking. and it is V8 comparable to Sh-AWD. It is asking not the transaction price.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/ctd/1869158979.html
2010 Hyundai GENESIS #8948, 10 miles, Automatic, Fuel Injected, - $38999 (burlingame)
VIN: KMHGC4DF3AU099804
Warranty: Yes
Stock #: 8948
Miles: 10
Exterior Color: White Satin Pearl
Interior Color: Cashmere
Automatic, Fuel Injected, 8 Cyl., 4.6, 4 Dr Sedan
Car with 175 mile on odo is $33K asking.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/1876423329.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/1874079060.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/ctd/1873394906.html
even 2010 with 10miles on odo is $39k asking. and it is V8 comparable to Sh-AWD. It is asking not the transaction price.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/ctd/1869158979.html
2010 Hyundai GENESIS #8948, 10 miles, Automatic, Fuel Injected, - $38999 (burlingame)
VIN: KMHGC4DF3AU099804
Warranty: Yes
Stock #: 8948
Miles: 10
Exterior Color: White Satin Pearl
Interior Color: Cashmere
Automatic, Fuel Injected, 8 Cyl., 4.6, 4 Dr Sedan
I misinterpreted what Krafcik said. He said over half of Genesis sold is over 40k. meaning avg. transaction will most likely be in high 30's. not bad at all for a non korean luxury brand.
...shows that Genesis has residual values on par with the Mercedes E-Class and better than the Lexus GS, BMW 5 Series, Cadillac CTS and STS, Lincoln MKS and Infiniti M. And the product mix has been incredibly rich, with over half of all Genesis' sold to date going out the door with sticker prices over $40,000. Our V8 engine mix runs around 45 percent — the highest optional V8 engine mix in the segment.
so p
Last edited by chungkopi; 08-05-2010 at 02:49 PM.
#1223
I misinterpreted what Krafcik said. He said over half of Genesis sold is over 40k.
http://www.insideline.com/hyundai/eq...n-krafcik.html
http://www.insideline.com/hyundai/eq...n-krafcik.html
#1224
hail to the victors
just browsed through genesis priced paid forum in edmunds. 36-39k avg transaction price is the ball park. it's definitely not low to mid 30's. so comparing genesis to CC(forgot who did) is ridiculous. different audience and almost 5k more than CC's avg.
for v6 - 33k to 37k (v6 with tech package is most popular)
for v8 - 37k to 40k
Last edited by chungkopi; 08-05-2010 at 03:12 PM.
#1225
Senior Moderator
TSX is not bigger than Audi A4/G37. and next BMW 3/IS will increase in length.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
#1226
6G TLX-S
TSX is not bigger than Audi A4/G37. and next BMW 3/IS will increase in length.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
TL has to grow up to BMW 5/Audi A6 siz & still handles better than both of them.
I highly doubt TL is going to be shrink much from current size even in 5G. it will still be atleast 190inch car.
When the days come the TSX was being compared with the A4/3-series/C-class,G, IS; and the TL with the A6/5-series/E-class/M/GS; Acura would be very, very, very, very happy because then it had succeeded to become a true luxury brand.
So any comparison of the TSX with the A4/G37/3/IS, and the TL with the 5/A6, means absolutely nothing.
#1227
Pricewisely, the TSX is being compared with the A3, 1-series. The TL with the A4, 3-series, C-class, Infiniti-G, Lexus-IS. The RL with the A6, 5-series, E-class, Infiniti-M, Lexus-GS.
When the days come the TSX was being compared with the A4/3-series/C-class,G, IS; and the TL with the A6/5-series/E-class/M/GS; Acura would be very, very, very, very happy because then it had succeeded to become a true luxury brand.
So any comparison of the TSX with the A4/G37/3/IS, and the TL with the 5/A6, means absolutely nothing.
When the days come the TSX was being compared with the A4/3-series/C-class,G, IS; and the TL with the A6/5-series/E-class/M/GS; Acura would be very, very, very, very happy because then it had succeeded to become a true luxury brand.
So any comparison of the TSX with the A4/G37/3/IS, and the TL with the 5/A6, means absolutely nothing.
Honda hasnt updated its transmission and engine line up for V6. once it is done in 2012-2013. it would be better. I dont see any reason TSX-SH-AWD pulling less than 0.99g. much more than BMW M3. once BMW 3 grow in size it has to implement AWD to be competitive.
#1228
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Honda Euro Accord is pretty competive with 4cylinder of A4/BMW 3 and surpass IS in diesel engine refinement.
Honda hasnt updated its transmission and engine line up for V6. once it is done in 2012-2013. it would be better. I dont see any reason TSX-SH-AWD pulling less than 0.99g. much more than BMW M3. once BMW 3 grow in size it has to implement AWD to be competitive.
Honda hasnt updated its transmission and engine line up for V6. once it is done in 2012-2013. it would be better. I dont see any reason TSX-SH-AWD pulling less than 0.99g. much more than BMW M3. once BMW 3 grow in size it has to implement AWD to be competitive.
I heard the 2012-2013 ford focus is gonna pull 1.9g on the skidpad!
Whatdya say to that!
#1229
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
#1231
AZ Community Team
Interesting how the S-class has fallen to 4th place behind the LS, 7-series, and Panamera. And the S-class is only a couple years old in design.....
And Audi is doing very well with the A5/S5, really surprised the Vette sells fewer than the Audi. I'd bet GM is working overtime now getting the Vette back into competition it's sales numbers are off by almost 3 to 1 from 2006. The C6 is a great performer but the interior still needs some improvement for a car in it's price range.
Slightly old article but still applies today
http://www.autoobserver.com/2010/01/...s-sputter.html
And Audi is doing very well with the A5/S5, really surprised the Vette sells fewer than the Audi. I'd bet GM is working overtime now getting the Vette back into competition it's sales numbers are off by almost 3 to 1 from 2006. The C6 is a great performer but the interior still needs some improvement for a car in it's price range.
Slightly old article but still applies today
http://www.autoobserver.com/2010/01/...s-sputter.html
#1232
Senior Moderator
Ford has $35b debt on its balance sheet and it is due 2012. and has already shed most of its Premier auto group. Ford will be mostly competing with Hyundai. as its Fusion hybrid sales will decline with Sonata Hybrid.
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
#1233
Interesting how the S-class has fallen to 4th place behind the LS, 7-series, and Panamera. And the S-class is only a couple years old in design.....
And Audi is doing very well with the A5/S5, really surprised the Vette sells fewer than the Audi. I'd bet GM is working overtime now getting the Vette back into competition it's sales numbers are off by almost 3 to 1 from 2006. The C6 is a great performer but the interior still needs some improvement for a car in it's price range.
Slightly old article but still applies today
http://www.autoobserver.com/2010/01/...s-sputter.html
And Audi is doing very well with the A5/S5, really surprised the Vette sells fewer than the Audi. I'd bet GM is working overtime now getting the Vette back into competition it's sales numbers are off by almost 3 to 1 from 2006. The C6 is a great performer but the interior still needs some improvement for a car in it's price range.
Slightly old article but still applies today
http://www.autoobserver.com/2010/01/...s-sputter.html
The fourth place drop is surprising, nevertheless.
#1234
AZ Community Team
I agree. The conversation on this board (and most others I participate on) are definitely skewed to the boy racer perspective. That's not to be meant to be a put down. I was a "boy racer" once and it's a perfectly legitimate perspective and a significant percent of the car buyers. But it's far from the majority of car buyers. In fact, given the fact that 50% of the drivers in the world are female and 2/3 of the male car buyers are over 40, we can pretty much guess that the topic of RWD/FWD, weight distribution, torque, horse power, etc. is on the minds of AT BEST about 15% of the car buyers walking into a dealership.
So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
So what's the point Mike? Point is that I wish boards like this one titled "Automotive News" could be a little broader in perspective. As an industry, it's not all about the few key topics we hear about on here all the time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_Brot...re_Art_Thou%3F
#1235
LS no longer competes with S class. S Class transaction prices are closer to $90K.
LS is more in $60k to $65k region. I would not be surprized if some dealers are distributing even cheaper than that.
Car is too bland and handles like boat. Only saving grace is all the latest technology like 8speed auto, DI, auto parking etc.
BMW 7 has introduced cheaper 6 six cylinder.
Lexus cannot compete beyond $70k price as LX sales have fallen way too low once its priced crossed $70k. Lexus is not a brand that is going upmarket.
LS is more in $60k to $65k region. I would not be surprized if some dealers are distributing even cheaper than that.
Car is too bland and handles like boat. Only saving grace is all the latest technology like 8speed auto, DI, auto parking etc.
BMW 7 has introduced cheaper 6 six cylinder.
Lexus cannot compete beyond $70k price as LX sales have fallen way too low once its priced crossed $70k. Lexus is not a brand that is going upmarket.
#1236
Evil Mazda Driver
Ford has $35b debt on its balance sheet and it is due 2012. and has already shed most of its Premier auto group. Ford will be mostly competing with Hyundai. as its Fusion hybrid sales will decline with Sonata Hybrid.
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
Only cash rich brands like Audi and Honda can produce high quality products independently.
#1237
Can someone just hand me moderator power so I can silence this fuck and get my powers revoked?
This is getting old and it's obvious trolling. I love the mods here but I know of no other forum (though I haven't visited many) where the moderators would put up with someone so widely disliked.
This is getting old and it's obvious trolling. I love the mods here but I know of no other forum (though I haven't visited many) where the moderators would put up with someone so widely disliked.
#1238
Oh so true. Many times while reading the threads on comments on what people think the auto manufactures should design and produce brings me back to the Simpson's episode where Homer designs a car for his brother's company and winds up ruining the business.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_Brot...re_Art_Thou%3F
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_Brot...re_Art_Thou%3F
#1239
Safety Car
Trolling
Atho I do not always agree or even understand what SSFTSX says most of the time, I would not consider her/him a troll ... there are others on here that I think more deserve that title. His/her posts are usually mature/respectful & on topic (@ least @ the beginning) ... & s/he seems to actually be a fan of Acura on what is supposed to "the unofficial Acura enthusiast resource". Trolls, to me, would be the people who are on here just to make snide comments or cheap shots @ Honda/Acura (even when they have nothing to do w/ topic on hand), insult/flame others etc etc
Back on topic:
Back on topic:
The Top of July 2010
1. Ford F-Series 50,449
2. Toyota Camry 35,056
3. Chevrolet Silverado 34,664
4. Toyota Corolla 27,345
5. Honda Accord 25,386
6. Honda Civic 23,902
7. Dodge Ram 20,138
8. Chevrolet Malibu 20,458
9. Honda CR-V 20,058
10. Nissan Altima 18,275
1. Ford F-Series 50,449
2. Toyota Camry 35,056
3. Chevrolet Silverado 34,664
4. Toyota Corolla 27,345
5. Honda Accord 25,386
6. Honda Civic 23,902
7. Dodge Ram 20,138
8. Chevrolet Malibu 20,458
9. Honda CR-V 20,058
10. Nissan Altima 18,275
#1240