Turbo Kit for Acura TL '04-'08

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2010, 12:43 AM
  #3681  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
^Rodney believes that too much torque is going to be the reason the trans may fail. We are looking for around 300lbs of torque and whatever HP that brings in
Old 07-16-2010, 01:40 AM
  #3682  
Burning Brakes
 
pass427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: florida
Age: 51
Posts: 769
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
libert, kn and hi speed thanks for keeping this turbo project alive and interesting ,if it werent for your purchases and unbelieveable patience there would only be a 30 page thread instead of a 93 page very informitive and exciting thread...and once again libert those brakes are definetly to die for sweeeeeeeet,just the whole car in general total sleeper im really sorry for unexpected victims...
Old 07-16-2010, 06:10 AM
  #3683  
J36Twingt28r's,nextgt30r
 
tenzingsherpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: lebanon, pa
Age: 34
Posts: 408
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by libert69
^Rodney believes that too much torque is going to be the reason the trans may fail. We are looking for around 300lbs of torque and whatever HP that brings in
i think u already are pushing the limits of the auto trans right now with the 280lbs torque. i know paul's j36 puts down about 270-280whp and blew a couple auto trans with just that much torque. i think ur going about it the right way though, tune for overall hp and keep torque around 300 and ur auto trans will last a little longer good luck man.
Old 07-16-2010, 06:53 AM
  #3684  
BANNED
 
NVA-AV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 53
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
"Lift on the Shift"

If you want to keep your AT learn to lift off the gas while the trans is changing gears......
Old 07-16-2010, 06:54 AM
  #3685  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
^Rodney believes that too much torque is going to be the reason the trans may fail. We are looking for around 300lbs of torque and whatever HP that brings in
Smart. Hp does not break parts. Torque is what breaks stuff.
Old 07-16-2010, 07:16 AM
  #3686  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by pass427
....the whole car in general total sleeper im really sorry for unexpected victims...
I agree. Bert, you are now quicker than me. As far as I can remember, your car is now the quickest 5AT. Congratulations dude. I know that you worked hard to get to this point.

Bert, I don't know your background with fast cars or motorcycles. But, I know that you are always open to advice. Please be extremely cautious as you re-learn to drive your car. Treat the gas pedal with a lot of respect. If you don't, the pedal will teach you to respect it....the hard way. That is one of the bad parts of having a car with power. You really have to control your impulses and anger. You need to think carefully before wot. Things will happen quick..... sometimes too damn quickly.

By the way. Watch the intake manifold in that video. That engine did not move/twist at all. Those engine mounts are doing a good job.
Old 07-16-2010, 07:33 AM
  #3687  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
What is the upper limit of the 6MT?

Congrat's Bert. Was the wait worth it? I think it was!!!!
Old 07-16-2010, 08:00 AM
  #3688  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by Opel
i am at almost 400 hp at the front wheels, and shitload of torque
Page 51, Post #2025 = Opel is a 6MT. He is putting down close to 400 whp. I do not recall him ever mentioning that he had trans issues.




Originally Posted by 04accordcpe
this was out of my original transmissio, which suffered the most damage. its never seen anything but a stock clutch kit too, so you cant blame on harsher engagement from an AM kit. i never ever bang through the gears, unless i was at the track. my thing is, i LOVE stomping in first gear at around 3k rpm and even 2nd gear arouind 4k rpm for bursts of speed. the scary thing is, none of my transmissions gave me any type of warning signs of failure. it gave out on me after coming out of a right turn and stomping on it right around 3-4k rpm. thats when i heard a fast tapping noise that turned into a "kunk, kunk, kunk, kunk, kunk" as i slowed down as i turned into a shopping plaza driveway. then my car just stopped and locked up on me and i couldnt go anywhere, even in neutral. it had to be dragged up the flatbed

my second one failed the same exact way, while WOT in first gear. 3rd one didnt actually fail on me while driving, but as i drained the gear oil while installing some brand new axles the gear oil smelled BAD! and i mean BAD!! like a dead skunk and had shrapnel floating around in it. so i drove her ever so gently until i found a good used low milage 06 accord tranny and had the lsd transplanted into it.


Page 50, Post #1972 = 04accordcpe mentions that he has destroyed two 6MT already. I don't recall his whp. He has a CT SC with the high boost pulley (I think).
Old 07-16-2010, 10:58 AM
  #3689  
"Like None Other"
iTrader: (3)
 
djbonsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CHI-TOWN!!
Age: 41
Posts: 1,521
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
By the way. Watch the intake manifold in that video. That engine did not move/twist at all. Those engine mounts are doing a good job.
i noticed the same thing! im stock and my motor moves more than that

Originally Posted by Inaccurate
Page 51, Post #2025 = Opel is a 6MT. He is putting down close to 400 whp. I do not recall him ever mentioning that he had trans issues.








Page 50, Post #1972 = 04accordcpe mentions that he has destroyed two 6MT already. I don't recall his whp. He has a CT SC with the high boost pulley (I think).
04accordcpe has the STOCK boost pulley i believe
Old 07-16-2010, 12:33 PM
  #3690  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
I hope the low torque number is not the enging blowing through the convertor or a clutch pack slipping.

I don't think anyone has actually broken an auto trans so we don't know the limit of the hard parts. Hopefully this fluid helps it on the friction material end.

As for the suggestions to lift during shifts, pretty sure it closes throttle anyway. This should be easily verified with the turbo installed. You should hear the BOV chirp quickly while your foot is to the floor.
Old 07-16-2010, 01:03 PM
  #3691  
BANNED
 
NVA-AV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 53
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
^Built J35 with 26X WTQ, cracked every friction in first gear.......
Old 07-16-2010, 01:06 PM
  #3692  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by NVA-AV6
^Built J35 with 26X WTQ, cracked every friction in first gear.......
Was it just the frictions or steels too? I'm wondering what the failure mode was. Did it slip until it overheated so bad that they cracked or did they crack from the torque? I'm guessing they were slipping first, overheated, and cracked. I've seen a lot of abused transmissions but never one that flat out cracked the frictions only from too much toruqe. They will normaly break free and slip before they crack.
Old 07-16-2010, 01:09 PM
  #3693  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
This reply is meant to just add another data point to the discussion.


Originally Posted by RACINGHART03
You will not be able to tune our car to a 50 shot. I tried. I ended up with about a 75 shot and the smallest fuel jet you can buy just to get it tuned to where I wanted it.

RacingHart03 had a 2008 Type-S 5AT. He regularly used (abused?) a nitrous 75-shot .

He never mentioned of having a broken 5AT. He did mention that his 5AT would shift very slowly while the nitrous was engaged.


Originally Posted by RACINGHART03
I have got to find the thread of my car shifting on the bottle (in full auto mode). It is soooo slow. Slower than off the bottle. Wonder if it uses calculated load value to increase or decrease ATF pressures or delays inputs from the shift pressure switches to save trannys? Its disgusting!

The following is just my theory. His trans had a slower shift speed with nitrous because the Z1 ATF was having difficulty trying to get the clutch pack to engage under the force of the nitrous. That is, he was experiencing clutch slippage. It is my opinion that this slippage would not cause a computer error code (DTC error) because the computer is programmed for slippage to be occurring at this stage. The computer has no way of knowing the time frame. That is, the computer is unaware of the prolonged slippage (i.e. time interval).

The computer just thinks that slippage is suppose to happen at this point. The computer just waits until the sensors have detected that the pack has fully engaged. The computer is not tracking the time duration of the slippage, so the computer is unaware that the slippage is excessive. Finally, the clutch pack does engage in spite of the slippery Z1.

This is were we are hoping that the Racing ATF (click here) will help.
Old 07-16-2010, 01:39 PM
  #3694  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
This reply is meant to just add another data point to the discussion.





RacingHart03 had a 2008 Type-S 5AT. He regularly used (abused?) a nitrous 75-shot .

He never mentioned of having a broken 5AT. He did mention that his 5AT would shift very slowly while the nitrous was engaged.





The following is just my theory. His trans had a slower shift speed with nitrous because the Z1 ATF was having difficulty trying to get the clutch pack to engage under the force of the nitrous. That is, he was experiencing clutch slippage. It is my opinion that this slippage would not cause a computer error code (DTC error) because the computer is programmed for slippage to be occurring at this stage. The computer has no way of knowing the time frame. That is, the computer is unaware of the prolonged slippage (i.e. time interval).

The computer just thinks that slippage is suppose to happen at this point. The computer just waits until the sensors have detected that the pack has fully engaged. The computer is not tracking the time duration of the slippage, so the computer is unaware that the slippage is excessive. Finally, the clutch pack does engage in spite of the slippery Z1.

This is were we are hoping that the Racing ATF (click here) will help.
Agreed. There are several supercharged ones, one in particular that had over 100,000 on the 5at with a mix of Amsoil and Z1.
Old 07-16-2010, 01:46 PM
  #3695  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
banelba / OP blew his AT didn't he? He hasn't been back since.
Old 07-16-2010, 01:51 PM
  #3696  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Originally Posted by banelba
My Auto TL is up and running again. I put the second tranny and lower the boost to 7.5PSI. Got tired of waiting to ear from Precision 10. I'm having a blast and so far so good. Rodney could tell you guys about the kills I have so far. As long as your +100k engine is without any major problem, you would be good to go.
On Friday I already got 2 tickets, one for speeding, going 52 on a 35. the car did not feel like it and the second one for not having my DL on me. On Saturday, I had a nice run with a base 07 Corvette. for those is Atlanta that are familiar with 166 "Freedom Pkwy" going to 75/85, that where we were playing at. The response is unbelievable, the tranny was and is still handling it great. Even though I got an auto, I like to put it on the manual mode. On 3rd gear, around 3500RPM is where the real pleasure comes. I always leave my traction control on, and I'm using 91 Octane. All I can tell you is WOW.
PS: The car was not dyno again at 7.5 PSI but on our estimation, we are around 350 to 360WHP
One of Banelba's last posts.. hmm..
Old 07-16-2010, 01:56 PM
  #3697  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
I might add for those that are unaware, but a 75 shot of nitrous will add exactly 100 Ft. Lbs. of torque at 4000 RPM. The 4k rpm being chosen as a realistic example of where max torque would occur with the 5AT and with nitrous engaged.

A typical Type-S will have approximately 230 ft. lbs. torque at 4000 rpm. Add the 100 ftlbs from nitrous, and we have 330 ft. lbs. of torque that RacingHart was probably pushing.

For peak HP, I estimate that RacingHart was at 335 HP. Take the oem 260 + 75 nitrous = 335 HP.

This is a far way off of what the turbo is able to really produce if that turbo was unleashed. Unleashed, the turbo would wreak havoc on the 5AT.
Old 07-16-2010, 02:26 PM
  #3698  
BANNED
 
NVA-AV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 53
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
Was it just the frictions or steels too? I'm wondering what the failure mode was. Did it slip until it overheated so bad that they cracked or did they crack from the torque? I'm guessing they were slipping first, overheated, and cracked. I've seen a lot of abused transmissions but never one that flat out cracked the frictions only from too much toruqe. They will normaly break free and slip before they crack.
Ohh, they were slipping a bit, with the TQ I was doing 1-2 burnouts with 3rd chirps, when I examined them yes both the steels and frictions were cracked, but the steels are actually thicker material and were not nearly as bad, personally I think it was pure TQ with the sticky tires (235 width Yokohamas). 2nd was also in bad shape. But the steels were not severly heat checked, some discoloration, but not fully blued nor heat distorted.....
Old 07-16-2010, 02:34 PM
  #3699  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by NVA-AV6
Ohh, they were slipping a bit, with the TQ I was doing 1-2 burnouts with 3rd chirps, when I examined them yes both the steels and frictions were cracked, but the steels are actually thicker material and were not nearly as bad, personally I think it was pure TQ with the sticky tires (235 width Yokohamas). 2nd was also in bad shape. But the steels were not severly heat checked, some discoloration, but not fully blued nor heat distorted.....
How were the sun shells? This is the common failure point with too much torque in the clutch pack area in nearly any trans, much more so than the clutches and steels. Please don't take this the wrong way, I'm not trying to argue and I really appreciate the info. Just want to get to the bottom of it.

Off topic but I remember in my early years thinking I was doing a burnout but instead I was just burning the trans up. That's a bad feeling.
Old 07-16-2010, 02:52 PM
  #3700  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts





I totally agree with IHC. We are not arguing at all with you Paul. We are just trying to get all of the facts to better understand this 5AT failure situation.

Here is the flow of power for 1st gear.

To me, the key question is does gear multiplication occur before or after the clutch pack. If the power is multiplied before reaching the pack, then I would say that for sure the sticky tires is what caused the failure.

If you have ever played with the math, you will see that the gear multiplication makes a huge difference.

Take for example what the trans output force is before the final drive. Let's say that 200 ftlbs is being sent into the trans.

Once the trans does it's 1st gear multiplication, this 200 ftlbs will become 513 ftlbs of force.

To duplicate the same amount of force *before* the gear multiplication, the engine would had needed to make that 513 ftlbs at the crank.

In other words, is the 1st-gear clutch pack handling 200 ftlbs or 513 ftlbs of force (to follow my example)?

From the diagram, it looks like the clutch is handling the 513. In that case, sticky tires would had caused the failure. Street tires would be a safety-fuse and not allow excessive torque to be built-up in first gear.

Last edited by Inaccurate; 07-16-2010 at 02:59 PM.
Old 07-16-2010, 03:17 PM
  #3701  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Forget my theory. After looking at the diagrams more closely, I was wrong. The gear multiplication occurs after the clutch pack. The sticky tires was not the main cause like I thought. The clutch pack was just handling (or, failed to handle) just the power produce from the engine without any gear multiplication.









Old 07-16-2010, 04:25 PM
  #3702  
BANNED
 
NVA-AV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 53
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
How were the sun shells? This is the common failure point with too much torque in the clutch pack area in nearly any trans, much more so than the clutches and steels. Please don't take this the wrong way, I'm not trying to argue and I really appreciate the info. Just want to get to the bottom of it.

Off topic but I remember in my early years thinking I was doing a burnout but instead I was just burning the trans up. That's a bad feeling.
No Sun/planetary gears in these, they are made more like a MT as far as the gears with multi-stack clutches for each gear that have a hydralic piston at one end of the individual pack, fluid is pumped and the solinoids control which pack get5s the presurized fluid to engage the clutch pack, then there is a set of linear solinoids which are pulsed to control the flow rate to the pack to allow for smooth engaugement.

Here are some pics from when I rebuilt the tranny in my pilot a few years ago when 2nd gear broke off a tooth, same core 3 shaft 5spd AT that is used all the way up to the 06TL, just has a extra shaft off the other side of the diff to power the rear wheels.

Name:  pilot036.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  131.0 KB
Name:  pilot037.jpg
Views: 32
Size:  110.7 KB
Name:  pilot038.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  74.1 KB
Name:  pilot039.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  114.3 KB
Name:  pilot040.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  122.7 KB
Name:  pilot041.jpg
Views: 34
Size:  128.7 KB
Name:  pilot042.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  136.5 KB
Name:  pilot043.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  76.8 KB
Name:  pilot044.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  110.3 KB
Name:  pilot045.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  79.8 KB
Name:  pilot046.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  61.2 KB
Old 07-16-2010, 09:05 PM
  #3703  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
What a long day. We went to the dyno at Bruces Speed Shop in Rockaway NJ. Its a mobile dynojet so it was outdoors. We did 11 pulls in 105 degree heat. Definitely not optimal conditions. IAT's were around 145 degrees. HP and TQ numbers started to fall on the last few runs because it was so hot.

Boost was turned down to 7lbs. VTEC is set at 4k. The best numbers were 320whp 281tq SAE.

Its very hard to read the graph because there are 11 runs on the same sheet

A/F
At 3000rpms were at 10.8 and climb to 12.5 at 5000rpms then steadily decline to 10.8 at 6800. More tuning is needed but we ran out of time.

My aem wideband sensor seems to be sticking lately. It just toggles back and forth between 14.8-14.9. We cleaned it with brake cleaner before the dyno and it was working on the dyno. Afterwards it stopped working again. Bad sensor?

We are not using the water/meth yet. Im very tempted to run the smallest nozzle (60ml) but I know the car will be too rich. Im going to hold off for now until the next dyno. Hopefully in a few weeks

I need to replace the spark plugs because they are more then likely fouled. You can feel a slight hesitation around 3000k rpms when accelerating moderately. Best way to describe it is like this....you start to accelerate and you let off the throttle for a half-second then hit the throttle again. That hesitation or loss of power for a split second is what im feeling.

Im sure Rodney will come on here and explain the huge difference between the auto and manual when it comes to timing that he was seeing.
Old 07-16-2010, 09:14 PM
  #3704  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by NVA-AV6
"Lift on the Shift"

If you want to keep your AT learn to lift off the gas while the trans is changing gears......
Will do

Originally Posted by KN_TL
What is the upper limit of the 6MT?

Congrat's Bert. Was the wait worth it? I think it was!!!!
Yes its a lot of fun.

Originally Posted by Inaccurate
I agree. Bert, you are now quicker than me. As far as I can remember, your car is now the quickest 5AT. Congratulations dude. I know that you worked hard to get to this point.

Bert, I don't know your background with fast cars or motorcycles. But, I know that you are always open to advice. Please be extremely cautious as you re-learn to drive your car. Treat the gas pedal with a lot of respect. If you don't, the pedal will teach you to respect it....the hard way. That is one of the bad parts of having a car with power. You really have to control your impulses and anger. You need to think carefully before wot. Things will happen quick..... sometimes too damn quickly.

By the way. Watch the intake manifold in that video. That engine did not move/twist at all. Those engine mounts are doing a good job.
Yes things do happen very quickly now lol. I have yet to even spin the tires. I dont even want to. I just love the third gear pull

Right now I have a innovative 60a front mount and a excellerate 75a side and rear mount. Innovative 85a front bushing is in the mail.

Originally Posted by I hate cars
I hope the low torque number is not the enging blowing through the convertor or a clutch pack slipping.

I don't think anyone has actually broken an auto trans so we don't know the limit of the hard parts. Hopefully this fluid helps it on the friction material end.

As for the suggestions to lift during shifts, pretty sure it closes throttle anyway. This should be easily verified with the turbo installed. You should hear the BOV chirp quickly while your foot is to the floor.
That low TQ number yesterday was just a rough guess by another tuner that was present. The graph wasnt working. I dont think it was too accurate

Originally Posted by Majofo
banelba / OP blew his AT didn't he? He hasn't been back since.
Rodney made a post on here in regards to banelba a while back. He said that banelba took the car back to his country (wherever that may be), lowered the boost a little bit and is running problem free.
Old 07-16-2010, 09:44 PM
  #3705  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
What a long day. We went to the dyno at Bruces Speed Shop in Rockaway NJ. Its a mobile dynojet so it was outdoors. We did 11 pulls in 105 degree heat. Definitely not optimal conditions. IAT's were around 145 degrees. HP and TQ numbers started to fall on the last few runs because it was so hot.

Boost was turned down to 7lbs. VTEC is set at 4k. The best numbers were 320whp 281tq SAE.

Its very hard to read the graph because there are 11 runs on the same sheet

A/F
At 3000rpms were at 10.8 and climb to 12.5 at 5000rpms then steadily decline to 10.8 at 6800. More tuning is needed but we ran out of time.

My aem wideband sensor seems to be sticking lately. It just toggles back and forth between 14.8-14.9. We cleaned it with brake cleaner before the dyno and it was working on the dyno. Afterwards it stopped working again. Bad sensor?

We are not using the water/meth yet. Im very tempted to run the smallest nozzle (60ml) but I know the car will be too rich. Im going to hold off for now until the next dyno. Hopefully in a few weeks

I need to replace the spark plugs because they are more then likely fouled. You can feel a slight hesitation around 3000k rpms when accelerating moderately. Best way to describe it is like this....you start to accelerate and you let off the throttle for a half-second then hit the throttle again. That hesitation or loss of power for a split second is what im feeling.

Im sure Rodney will come on here and explain the huge difference between the auto and manual when it comes to timing that he was seeing.
I know it's already just a little on the rich side but I have a feeling installing the meth with the small jet will increase power numbers in that kind of heat.

Torque isn't that bad but I feel it should be closer to 300lbs. At what rpm will it hit full boost at?
Old 07-16-2010, 10:01 PM
  #3706  
BANNED
 
NVA-AV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 53
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
What a long day. We went to the dyno at Bruces Speed Shop in Rockaway NJ. Its a mobile dynojet so it was outdoors. We did 11 pulls in 105 degree heat. Definitely not optimal conditions. IAT's were around 145 degrees. HP and TQ numbers started to fall on the last few runs because it was so hot.

Boost was turned down to 7lbs. VTEC is set at 4k. The best numbers were 320whp 281tq SAE.

Its very hard to read the graph because there are 11 runs on the same sheet

A/F
At 3000rpms were at 10.8 and climb to 12.5 at 5000rpms then steadily decline to 10.8 at 6800. More tuning is needed but we ran out of time.

My aem wideband sensor seems to be sticking lately. It just toggles back and forth between 14.8-14.9. We cleaned it with brake cleaner before the dyno and it was working on the dyno. Afterwards it stopped working again. Bad sensor?

We are not using the water/meth yet. Im very tempted to run the smallest nozzle (60ml) but I know the car will be too rich. Im going to hold off for now until the next dyno. Hopefully in a few weeks

I need to replace the spark plugs because they are more then likely fouled. You can feel a slight hesitation around 3000k rpms when accelerating moderately. Best way to describe it is like this....you start to accelerate and you let off the throttle for a half-second then hit the throttle again. That hesitation or loss of power for a split second is what im feeling.

Im sure Rodney will come on here and explain the huge difference between the auto and manual when it comes to timing that he was seeing.


****YOU ARE GOING TO BLOW YOUR ENGINE*****

10.8 is wayyyy to rich, change your oil immediatly as it is probably fuel fouled and thinned out. This is also why the AEM gauge is not working correctly, it is also getting fuel/carbon fouled.
Old 07-16-2010, 10:35 PM
  #3707  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
I know it's already just a little on the rich side but I have a feeling installing the meth with the small jet will increase power numbers in that kind of heat.

Torque isn't that bad but I feel it should be closer to 300lbs. At what rpm will it hit full boost at?
well from 3rd gear full boost is around 70mph. Somewhere around 4.5k

Originally Posted by NVA-AV6
****YOU ARE GOING TO BLOW YOUR ENGINE*****

10.8 is wayyyy to rich, change your oil immediatly as it is probably fuel fouled and thinned out. This is also why the AEM gauge is not working correctly, it is also getting fuel/carbon fouled.
That explains why spraying the sensor with brake cleaner fixed it temporarily

Where do we want to be a/f wise under full throttle? Closer to 12 across the entire powerband?
Old 07-17-2010, 12:21 AM
  #3708  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
well from 3rd gear full boost is around 70mph. Somewhere around 4.5k



That explains why spraying the sensor with brake cleaner fixed it temporarily

Where do we want to be a/f wise under full throttle? Closer to 12 across the entire powerband?
I missed the AF part of your post.

Low 12s to mid 12s is good for a daily driver. It's safe but not so safe that you're losing a ton of power or washing down the cylinders. You can go leaner at the track with good fuel while monitoring knock constantly and gain another 5% or so in power.

It's ok and somewhat normal to see 10s in the transition into boost but it should only be briefly as in 1 second or so. Your turbo not spooling till 4,500rpm is a result of the super rich AF. Once you lean it out, the turbo will spool much quicker and at a lower rpm. The hesitation should disappar also.

Remember, too rich of an AF can cause knock also. I never hear anyone mentioning this but I've witnessed it on several cars. It usually occurs when the Af is abnormally rich as in richer than 10:1.

While your hp will go up a bit, your torque should really jump with the correct AF.
Old 07-17-2010, 01:11 AM
  #3709  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Old 07-17-2010, 06:08 AM
  #3710  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Can these be cleaned or just get new ones?

Old 07-17-2010, 06:23 AM
  #3711  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
Don't they look fine?

Is Rodney still around for your tuning?

I find it hard to do keep an eye on the A/F meter while driving. I should have just gone with an Innovate A/F and all their goodies but hindsight is 20/20. For now, I've tied my AEM UEGO to the F/IC and I am going to log the A/F readings there.

I'd eventually like to get the OT-2 and the SSI-4 so I can add the instruments with the analog outputs.
Old 07-17-2010, 10:53 AM
  #3712  
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Hi speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Received 256 Likes on 208 Posts
I am running the innovative AFR and its working great. Don't have any goodies Oliver in but maybe in time. I dropped $700 this week on methanol and methanol related accessories.
Old 07-17-2010, 12:54 PM
  #3713  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Should the plugs for this car have a resistor? How come some sites say that you cant gap iridium plugs? We gaped the ngk BKR8EIX to .20 and it was working fine.

Will these plugs work ngk R5671A-8
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/NGK-4554/

Shorty Spark Plug No
Resistor No
Manufacturer Heat Range 8
Electrode Core Material Copper
Electrode Tip Material Nickel alloy
Insulator Type Non-projected
Spark Plug Thread Size 14mm
Spark Plug Reach 0.750 in.
Spark Plug Seat Style Gasket
Wrench Diameter 5/8 in.
Ground Strap Quantity One
NGK Part Number R5671A-8
Old 07-17-2010, 12:57 PM
  #3714  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
It would not be a bad idea to crossreference these plugs to some "regular" plugs, NGK, AcDelco, etc, in the same heat range. Especially while you're in the tuning stage and likely to foul them out. I prefer regular plugs when running boost or nitrous. The iridiums seem more prone to detonation to me.
Old 07-17-2010, 12:59 PM
  #3715  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
I missed the AF part of your post.

Low 12s to mid 12s is good for a daily driver. It's safe but not so safe that you're losing a ton of power or washing down the cylinders. You can go leaner at the track with good fuel while monitoring knock constantly and gain another 5% or so in power.

It's ok and somewhat normal to see 10s in the transition into boost but it should only be briefly as in 1 second or so. Your turbo not spooling till 4,500rpm is a result of the super rich AF. Once you lean it out, the turbo will spool much quicker and at a lower rpm. The hesitation should disappar also.

Remember, too rich of an AF can cause knock also. I never hear anyone mentioning this but I've witnessed it on several cars. It usually occurs when the Af is abnormally rich as in richer than 10:1.

While your hp will go up a bit, your torque should really jump with the correct AF.
The problem was trying to tune the car in 105 degrees with the IATs at 145 degrees. A/F was all over the place. The A/F from the first dyno was 12.0 to 12.8 across the board.

Ive been to busy watching the road when WOT instead of watching the gauges but full boost 7.5lbs is around 4000rpms not 4500
Old 07-17-2010, 01:03 PM
  #3716  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
heres the oe plug specs

Shorty Spark Plug No
Resistor Yes
Electrode Core Material Copper
Electrode Tip Material Iridium/Platinum
Insulator Type Non-projected
Spark Plug Thread Size 14mm
Spark Plug Reach 0.750 in.
Spark Plug Seat Style Gasket
Wrench Diameter 5/8 in.
Ground Strap Quantity One
NGK Part Number IZFR6K-11

heres the R5671A-8

Shorty Spark Plug No
Resistor No
Manufacturer Heat Range 8
Electrode Core Material Copper
Electrode Tip Material Nickel alloy
Insulator Type Non-projected
Spark Plug Thread Size 14mm
Spark Plug Reach 0.750 in.
Spark Plug Seat Style Gasket
Wrench Diameter 5/8 in.
Ground Strap Quantity One
NGK Part Number R5671A-8

I guess that answers the resistor question
Old 07-17-2010, 01:05 PM
  #3717  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by KN_TL
Don't they look fine?

Is Rodney still around for your tuning?

I find it hard to do keep an eye on the A/F meter while driving. I should have just gone with an Innovate A/F and all their goodies but hindsight is 20/20. For now, I've tied my AEM UEGO to the F/IC and I am going to log the A/F readings there.

I'd eventually like to get the OT-2 and the SSI-4 so I can add the instruments with the analog outputs.
They look fouled from all the fuel. Rodney went home but is coming back sometime in august and we will be at the dyno again with better conditions.
Old 07-17-2010, 01:18 PM
  #3718  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
The problem was trying to tune the car in 105 degrees with the IATs at 145 degrees. A/F was all over the place. The A/F from the first dyno was 12.0 to 12.8 across the board.

Ive been to busy watching the road when WOT instead of watching the gauges but full boost 7.5lbs is around 4000rpms not 4500
It can be kind of hard to watch the guages. I still think with that turbo, boost should come in nearly 1,000rpm sooner.

Use the dyno to get it in the ballpark but it will change when you put it back on the street.

I don't know enough about your engine management but once wide open AF should be a flat line with very little variation. I'm sure others can help you with the reasons why it's doing this.

You can always tune it just a little on the lean side and use the meth to put it where you want it. You will get the most power and this will be the safest for the engine, assuming the meth never fails. The meth *might* end up adding consistency to your AF ratio.

Is the IAT sensor pre turbo or post turbo? If it's post turbo, you're doing pretty good.
Old 07-17-2010, 01:41 PM
  #3719  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
It can be kind of hard to watch the guages. I still think with that turbo, boost should come in nearly 1,000rpm sooner.

Use the dyno to get it in the ballpark but it will change when you put it back on the street.

I don't know enough about your engine management but once wide open AF should be a flat line with very little variation. I'm sure others can help you with the reasons why it's doing this.

You can always tune it just a little on the lean side and use the meth to put it where you want it. You will get the most power and this will be the safest for the engine, assuming the meth never fails. The meth *might* end up adding consistency to your AF ratio.

Is the IAT sensor pre turbo or post turbo? If it's post turbo, you're doing pretty good.
Im still using the stock iat sensor for my readings.

110 degrees on the MID sitting in stand still NYC traffic for 30 minutes....highest iat recorded was 154. Bone stock TL in those conditions is around 140-145. Not bad at all
Old 07-17-2010, 02:51 PM
  #3720  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
Im still using the stock iat sensor for my readings.

110 degrees on the MID sitting in stand still NYC traffic for 30 minutes....highest iat recorded was 154. Bone stock TL in those conditions is around 140-145. Not bad at all
So if it's still in the intake manifold and you're only seeing 9-14F increase over stock, that says something about the turbo and intercooler's efficiency. Not bad at all. Once you get the meth hooked up, the IATs are going to drop like a rock and power will be much more consistant from cold to hot.


Quick Reply: Turbo Kit for Acura TL '04-'08



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 PM.