View Poll Results: Is your team in cap hell?
Yes
0
0%
No
0
0%
Don't care
0
0%
Go Nordiques!
0
0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll
Hockey: News and Discussion Thread
The following users liked this post:
97BlackAckCL (04-01-2016)
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Text me some pics
Senior Moderator
Can the playoffs start, please?
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Remember when I said how I couldn't stand how Keith went after people and took dirty cheapshots and Yummy went balistic? I do...
Senior Moderator
^ Remember when I wrote that Keith is an idiot? I'm not defending him here this time, am I...?
The following users liked this post:
97BlackAckCL (04-04-2016)
Senior Moderator
Trolling Canuckistan
^^^
It's a phone hearing but only because he waived his right to an in person hearing. Should be 10, he knew exactly what he was doing.
It's a phone hearing but only because he waived his right to an in person hearing. Should be 10, he knew exactly what he was doing.
Senior Moderator
Hawks and Keith duck a giant bullet...only 6 games.
Put it this way: Coyle is no saint for what he did prior to Keith's golf-swing. Similar to what happened against Carter in the playoffs, the other player took advantage of a situation when Keith was "vulnerable". So, in that case, Carter clearly slashed Keith's barehand. Bad temper resulted.
Coyle's play was similar. Keith was on his way down and Coyle just decided to add some sauce to that by giving the Hawk a bit more to it. Keith got enraged...golf-swing.
End of the day, the retaliation ALWAYS gets caught. And Keith should be way smarter than that. He should be thanking his lucky stars that he only got 6. Hawks have ZERO chance in the playoffs without him.
Put it this way: Coyle is no saint for what he did prior to Keith's golf-swing. Similar to what happened against Carter in the playoffs, the other player took advantage of a situation when Keith was "vulnerable". So, in that case, Carter clearly slashed Keith's barehand. Bad temper resulted.
Coyle's play was similar. Keith was on his way down and Coyle just decided to add some sauce to that by giving the Hawk a bit more to it. Keith got enraged...golf-swing.
End of the day, the retaliation ALWAYS gets caught. And Keith should be way smarter than that. He should be thanking his lucky stars that he only got 6. Hawks have ZERO chance in the playoffs without him.
Senior Moderator
The following 3 users liked this post by Yumcha:
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Hawks and Keith duck a giant bullet...only 6 games.
Put it this way: Coyle is no saint for what he did prior to Keith's golf-swing. Similar to what happened against Carter in the playoffs, the other player took advantage of a situation when Keith was "vulnerable". So, in that case, Carter clearly slashed Keith's barehand. Bad temper resulted.
Coyle's play was similar. Keith was on his way down and Coyle just decided to add some sauce to that by giving the Hawk a bit more to it. Keith got enraged...golf-swing.
End of the day, the retaliation ALWAYS gets caught. And Keith should be way smarter than that. He should be thanking his lucky stars that he only got 6. Hawks have ZERO chance in the playoffs without him.
Put it this way: Coyle is no saint for what he did prior to Keith's golf-swing. Similar to what happened against Carter in the playoffs, the other player took advantage of a situation when Keith was "vulnerable". So, in that case, Carter clearly slashed Keith's barehand. Bad temper resulted.
Coyle's play was similar. Keith was on his way down and Coyle just decided to add some sauce to that by giving the Hawk a bit more to it. Keith got enraged...golf-swing.
End of the day, the retaliation ALWAYS gets caught. And Keith should be way smarter than that. He should be thanking his lucky stars that he only got 6. Hawks have ZERO chance in the playoffs without him.
That's an understatement
Azine Jabroni
Give me St. Louis any day of the week over the other options.
Dallas or LA without Keith? Yikes.
Dallas or LA without Keith? Yikes.
Senior Moderator
Azine Jabroni
Trolling Canuckistan
I just realized the Bruins had an afternoon matinee game today. Apparently, the the Bruins themselves have yet to realize that they are playing an afternoon matinee game today.
The following users liked this post:
97BlackAckCL (04-04-2016)
Team Owner
Well, despite having more points this season, the oilers are now officially dead last. Sigh.
Senior Moderator
Yeast Mode probably heard all the McJesus and Gotonotbehere talk and said in his Drago voice "Enough. I will finish this."
...and scored a pile of points the last 2 games.
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Hawks took a 3 minute nap and allowed the Bruins to score 3 goals.
Senior Moderator
6-4. Well, at least this will be entertaining.
Senior Moderator
The quote:
Source: https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nh...174854844.html
What a disgraceful franchise.
McLellan also used sarcasm in saying the Oilers took a "Players' Association day" for the game meaning his team in essence had a mandated day off.
What a disgraceful franchise.
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Keith should have gotten 10, this league is a joke
Team Owner
The quote:
Source: https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nh...174854844.html
What a disgraceful franchise.
Source: https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nh...174854844.html
What a disgraceful franchise.
Team Owner
Senior Moderator
The following users liked this post:
97BlackAckCL (04-05-2016)
Trolling Canuckistan
The following users liked this post:
97BlackAckCL (04-05-2016)
Trolling Canuckistan
Team Owner
Right, but Keith isn't known to be a dirty player who does this kind of stuff all the time. I think he had, what, one other incident? Torres snorts a few lines and goes out on the ice looking for trouble. I'm not justifying his actions, but I think missing even one playoff game is a big deal.
Senior Moderator
Why can't the NHL just use a set-games template? Seriously.
So, first time no-no-play, gets you X games. If it is a repeat of the same no-no-play, you get X+Y games. Such random assignment of games is stupid and just attracts criticism and head-shaking.
I mean, I certainly don't get paid as much as these NHL people but you can't tell me the science behind suspensions is SO complex that I need 2345315 PhDs and a degree in rocket science? WTF. It's common sense!
So, first time no-no-play, gets you X games. If it is a repeat of the same no-no-play, you get X+Y games. Such random assignment of games is stupid and just attracts criticism and head-shaking.
I mean, I certainly don't get paid as much as these NHL people but you can't tell me the science behind suspensions is SO complex that I need 2345315 PhDs and a degree in rocket science? WTF. It's common sense!
Team Owner
It might not be a bad idea. I think the NHLs justification is that not every player is the same. Is it right? The legal system isn't much different, is it? People's past always seems to influence what happens to them.
Senior Moderator
Right, but Keith isn't known to be a dirty player who does this kind of stuff all the time. I think he had, what, one other incident? Torres snorts a few lines and goes out on the ice looking for trouble. I'm not justifying his actions, but I think missing even one playoff game is a big deal.
So, this would be his 3rd overall. Keith has a temper that can be used against him...FWIW, all 3 incidents were with Keith retaliating. Still he should know that the retaliation ALWAYS gets caught.
Senior Moderator
If the no-no play is SERIOUS enough to get thrown out of the game...and immediately crosses into the suspension discussion, that's where I think the formula needs to come into play.
Regardless of past, it should be X games for whatever no-no play was serious enough to warrant a suspension. Period. If the player is a repeater, even from 5 years ago, does not matter: it's X+Y. Easy! And if 3rd time repeater, X+Y+Z...and so on.
Team Owner
^ didn't know this. Hmmm... Interesting.
Team Owner
But what comes after Z?!?!?
Senior Moderator