Console & Computer Gaming Latest news in the world of gaming. Xbox One, PS4, and more…

Sony: PS3 News and Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #641  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
Originally Posted by juniorbean
MS rushing their product to market which was ripe with hardware problems from the start
what are you talking about, the 360 had no problems. ;p

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=19878
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #642  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Wait... I'm confused. So you think b/c Sega decided to pull online play out of their game Sony is shooting themselves in the foot? I see several problems with this...

1) It's Sega's decision
2) Sony has nothing to do with it
3) Who gives a shit about online play with Sega Tennis?
4) It will only hurt Sega's sale of the game, not console sales
You're right. Dunno what I meant with the shootingselvesinfoot comment. I think my main point was that its bad for a developer to "pull out" of doing an online option for a game such as this.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #643  
Silver™'s Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 37,312
Likes: 337
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by srika
You're right. Dunno what I meant with the shootingselvesinfoot comment. I think my main point was that its bad for a developer to "pull out" of doing an online option for a game such as this.

But the question is why take it out of a game that it already exists in?

Is a port to the PS3 that difficult?

Or is there an issue with the PS3 online capabilities?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:17 PM
  #644  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by Silver™
Most experts think that the graphics will be about equal, at most a negligible difference for most.
It's not all about graphics. Processing power can affect the visual effects, how many items are displayed on a screen, and so on. So graphically they may be very close, but presentation from one to the other can vary b/c of this. But I do agree with you on the generalization... probably not a huge deal.


Originally Posted by Silver™
1080p is worthless to me and virtually everyone else. I just bought a new HDTV last year and have no desire to spend $3,000 again for slightly better graphics for a game console. 90% of what I use the TV for is watching cable, and that sure won't be 1080p for a long while. So 1080p does not overwhelm me one bit.
1080p may be worthless to most now (and I agree), however, having it to me is huge. In addition, all electronic stores are pretty much clearing out their old 720p/1080i TVs since 1080p sets are becoming the norm. So most TV sales now are 1080p which the PS3 will support. So yes, people who puchased a TV in the past and didn't get 1080p will not give a rats ass, however, anyone who buys a TV going forward will likely be getting a TV with 1080p support, and the PS3 supports it out of the box. Additionally I'll take HDMI connectivity over component connectivity anyday, 1080p or 720p. Just having it makes the system future proof which is an advantage IMO.


Originally Posted by Silver™
Blu-Ray is a format that might or not make it. Not a big deal to me

Chances are that Blu-Ray and HD-DVD will be upstaged by ondemand video anyways.
True on the first statement and it's not a huge deal to me, however, I am excited to have it. I'll probably end up with both, so getting the BluRay with the PS3 works out well. In the future both will be upstaged by OnDemand... I agree, but we're years away from that. Right now through cable I get hundreds of OnDemand movies... and you're lucky if 6-12 are available via the OnDemand-HD function.

Having the ability to get movies in BluRay and play them back is a nice perk to me. Now, could Sony have gone the MS route and not included the player only to have it offered later as an add-on (thus dropping the price of the system itself), sure, but they didn't, and I'll gladly take my BluRay player with my PS3.

Originally Posted by Silver™
I would rather have it give me feedback (rumble)
Guess this is more of a personal preference. I personally could care less about rumbling. As long as the controller is comfortable, has good range, and works well, I'm happy.


Originally Posted by Silver™


And more importantly I have been playing those games for the last year instead of sitting on my butt waiting for the Sony delays to finally end.
Yes, you've been playing a few good games for the last year. So you spent between $350-$600 depending on your setup to play a couple of good games over the last year. However, 95% of the 360's lineup until recently has been shit. Read the responses in this topic, or go to other forums... many people are not happy with their 360 b/c they spent all of this money a year ago and the quality of games has been shit. Even the MS fan boys are asking why it's taken so long for the good games to come out. The answer is obvious, however, what's done is done and 360 owners should be happy the good stuff is finally coming.



Originally Posted by Silver™
Yea, it doesn't seem like Sony is rushing to make it to market in time before 2007 or anything.

If you don't think there will be similar issues with the PS3, I have a bridge to sell you.
Nope, doesn't seem like they're rushing it at all. Seems like they're tweaking it further to give them a larger advantage over MS when they do launch... but I don't see any signs that they're rushing it. If they released it when they originally planned to in spring 2006, it would have been a rush. All they're doing now is fine tuning little things and preparing it for launch.

As for issues, I've purchased pretty much every system except for the Gamecube and 360 dating back to the Genesis and SNES at launch, and I've never ever had a problem. In fact, I still own pretty much every system and they all still work... even over a decade later. Will there be some problems? I'm sure there will be... but I don't think it will be the fiasco MS had to deal with at launch. From my personal experiences I'm not expecting any problems... so if that bridge is deeded and you're offering it at a fair price... we may need to talk

.

Last edited by juniorbean; Sep 26, 2006 at 02:34 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #645  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by Silver™
But the question is why take it out of a game that it already exists in?

Is a port to the PS3 that difficult?

Or is there an issue with the PS3 online capabilities?
I'm sure there's a difference with writing it to XBOX Live and writing it to the PS3 online system. Why they took it out... who knows... and honestly, who cares? I downloaded the free demo of the game on XBOX Live and deleted it 15 minutes later.

Now, if they start announcing that EA Sports is removing all online play from the PS3, then I'd start to worry (and wouldn't' buy a PS3).
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #646  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by Silver™
How could keeping your product a secret be a good business decision less than 2 months before it is released???

It's not like a competitor is going to steal their ideas and release a copy next year.

Besides yourself, I don't think most consumers or investors think that Sony is really handling this correctly.
But that's what I don't get... you know all of the important facts:

1) Specs have been out for months
2) Main features have been out for months
3) Pricing has been out for months
4) Expected launch titles have been out for months
5) Game prices have been out for months

So the only rumors floating around are very minor things... possible price cuts is the only one I can think of at this point that is truly up in the air. My local game stores have had prices on these games for months... and they haven't changed.. so not sure what the big deal is there. The rumble feature is something new, but it's not a rumor, they decided not to do it for reasons mentioned in the article.

Until the product is released in 2 months it's technically still under development... so of course minor things may change as they tweak the system to give them whatever advantage they can. Additionally, as I said before... who's to say that these changes (such as rumble and HDMI support) haven't been planned for some time, but only now are they deciding to release the info after they did their due diligance (sp?) internally. Not sure I see the big deal.

Also, if I remember correctly the XBOX and PS2 were launched around the same time... and I'm also remembering a bunch of different price announcements WEEKS before they actually launched. So again, not sure I see the big deal about pricing rumors this far out from the launch.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:42 PM
  #647  
ViperrepiV's Avatar
sup
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 1
From: NYC
aaaaannnnyyyyywayyyss, i call for an end to this bitter debate, at least for a bit.

Now that the less expensive PS3 will have HDMI support, what are the differences between the two different versions? What do you get for an extra $100, if that is what it ends up being? I was originally gearing for the more expensive version due to the HDMI.

I also heard that the more expensive version will have 2 HDMI ports. What will people do with two ports?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #648  
Silver™'s Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 37,312
Likes: 337
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by ViperrepiV
What will people do with two ports?

99% of the people will do nothing. It is for "super letterbox" display on side-by-side HDTVs.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #649  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by ViperrepiV
aaaaannnnyyyyywayyyss, i call for an end to this bitter debate, at least for a bit.

Now that the less expensive PS3 will have HDMI support, what are the differences between the two different versions? What do you get for an extra $100, if that is what it ends up being? I was originally gearing for the more expensive version due to the HDMI.

I also heard that the more expensive version will have 2 HDMI ports. What will people do with two ports?
Who's bitter? I'm not and judging by Silver's replies... he's not either. Just a discussion

Anyway, the biggest difference will be the hard drives. The more expensive one will have a 60gb while the lower one will have the 20gb. I was with you... gearing up for the more expensive version to get HDMI support, but now I may not have to... which is pretty sweet.

As for the two HDMI ports, I haven't seen anything about that... but yes, Silver is right, it will be useless for pretty much 99% of the people out there unless someone has a sweet dual HDTV theater setup
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:12 PM
  #650  
ViperrepiV's Avatar
sup
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 1
From: NYC
do both have wifi? or is that only in the more expensive version?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #651  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by ViperrepiV
do both have wifi? or is that only in the more expensive version?
Not 100% sure, which is why I didn't comment. Not sure if they're going to do it like the 360 where you just add it on or not. I have the house networked, so that won't effect me... but good question.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #652  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
^ OK, just found it...

$599 version has ethernet, wi-fi, 60gb HD, and only one HDMI port (when the system was first announced at E3 2005 it had two HDMI ports, but as of E3 2006 through current, only one)

$499 version has ethernet only, 20gb HD, and one HDMI port.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #653  
ViperrepiV's Avatar
sup
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 1
From: NYC
yeah, i don't know if that is worth the extra $100
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #654  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
^ I'll have to see how I'm feeling come launch. $100 for 40gb extra and wi-fi may be worth it... if not for the wi-fi for the extra storage space since I won't mod my system. We'll see how I feel when I'm actually at the store to buy one
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:34 PM
  #655  
SwervinCL's Avatar
Nom Nom Nom Nom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 76
From: Universal City
Originally Posted by juniorbean
^ I'll have to see how I'm feeling come launch. $100 for 40gb extra and wi-fi may be worth it... if not for the wi-fi for the extra storage space since I won't mod my system. We'll see how I feel when I'm actually at the store to buy one
See if you knew more details about the system and games, then you could make that decision now, as opposed to launch day.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #656  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by SwervinCL
See if you knew more details about the system and games, then you could make that decision now, as opposed to launch day.
nice try... but not the same thing considering I DO know everything already as far as what is included with each system... just not sure if I want to buy the more expensive system or not. Even if there are price drops there will still be two systems at two different price points, so a decision will still need to be made. Knowing me I'll end up with the more expensive system like I did with the 360.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #657  
gocubsgo55's Avatar
101 years of heartache...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
From: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
OK, so I just got off the phone with EB Games regarding a preorder. The deal is I preorder a game and have the option of preordering the console when the time comes. $500 for the base, $600 for the 60 GB + HDMI.

I was not planning on doing this, but I am at college and my brother really misses me. I have some extra cash and he wants a Nintendo DS (yeah bullshit, I'll get him this thing. Besides, this thing is cool as hell and would set me up for the new Gran Turismo).

My family owns an HD capable TV (forgot the technical term for it; it's a Sony that gets HD only when an HD receiver is connected). First off, I am lower prices here, so are EBXs prices going to go down as well? Also, should I spend the $100 more for the extra memory + HDMI capability?

Can't wait to see the look on his face when he gets this. I was hoping for Christmas, but I am planning on giving him an "I.O.U." or "Redeem this for a FREE PS3!" card. I remember the pictures my parents took of me when they bought me a brand new Playstation. I was going absolutely crazy. I think it's time I return the favour
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #658  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
Originally Posted by juniorbean
1080p may be worthless to most now (and I agree), however, having it to me is huge. In addition, all electronic stores are pretty much clearing out their old 720p/1080i TVs since 1080p sets are becoming the norm. So most TV sales now are 1080p which the PS3 will support. So yes, people who puchased a TV in the past and didn't get 1080p will not give a rats ass, however, anyone who buys a TV going forward will likely be getting a TV with 1080p support, and the PS3 supports it out of the box. Additionally I'll take HDMI connectivity over component connectivity anyday, 1080p or 720p. Just having it makes the system future proof which is an advantage IMO.
Totally - future thinking ftw. Remember PS has a long shelf life. Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't games still being developed for PSone???
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #659  
SwervinCL's Avatar
Nom Nom Nom Nom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 76
From: Universal City
Originally Posted by juniorbean
nice try... but not the same thing considering I DO know everything already as far as what is included with each system... just not sure if I want to buy the more expensive system or not. Even if there are price drops there will still be two systems at two different price points, so a decision will still need to be made. Knowing me I'll end up with the more expensive system like I did with the 360.
Thought i'd try to get cha.

I got the expensive 360 because it is honestly stupid to get the cheaper one. A wireless controller and a hard drive come out to an extra 150 bucks. So if you got the cheap one and added those two items your 50 bucks over the price of the premium system.

Assuming the "cheaper" PS3 launches at 420.00. Are the only differences gonna be the size of the hard drives? There has got to be more different to justify spending the extra money on the more expensive system. I mean, they cant just sell the 60 gig hard drive for 180 bucks, could they?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 03:59 PM
  #660  
ViperrepiV's Avatar
sup
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 1
From: NYC
Originally Posted by juniorbean
^ I'll have to see how I'm feeling come launch. $100 for 40gb extra and wi-fi may be worth it... if not for the wi-fi for the extra storage space since I won't mod my system. We'll see how I feel when I'm actually at the store to buy one

what do you think you'll use the storage space for?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #661  
SwervinCL's Avatar
Nom Nom Nom Nom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 76
From: Universal City
Wi-Fi is not really a big deal to me. I still prefer being wired, especially playing games.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #662  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
OK, so I just got off the phone with EB Games regarding a preorder. The deal is I preorder a game and have the option of preordering the console when the time comes. $500 for the base, $600 for the 60 GB + HDMI.

I was not planning on doing this, but I am at college and my brother really misses me. I have some extra cash and he wants a Nintendo DS (yeah bullshit, I'll get him this thing. Besides, this thing is cool as hell and would set me up for the new Gran Turismo).

My family owns an HD capable TV (forgot the technical term for it; it's a Sony that gets HD only when an HD receiver is connected). First off, I am lower prices here, so are EBXs prices going to go down as well? Also, should I spend the $100 more for the extra memory + HDMI capability?

Can't wait to see the look on his face when he gets this. I was hoping for Christmas, but I am planning on giving him an "I.O.U." or "Redeem this for a FREE PS3!" card. I remember the pictures my parents took of me when they bought me a brand new Playstation. I was going absolutely crazy. I think it's time I return the favour
Have you ready any of the thread? Most of your questions have been answered. Just in case.. here goes' again..

1) Right now, no price drop in the US... so $499 and $599 is what it will be at launch as far as we know now. Price will be the same at every retail store.

2) Both versions will have HDMI, so you will not need to spend more for that. Spending the extra $100 gives you 40gb more of HD space and WiFi.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #663  
Silver™'s Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 37,312
Likes: 337
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by juniorbean
2) Both versions will have HDMI, so you will not need to spend more for that. Spending the extra $100 gives you 40gb more of HD space and WiFi.

And MemoryStick/SD/CompactFlash compatibility.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 04:35 PM
  #664  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by SwervinCL
Thought i'd try to get cha.

I got the expensive 360 because it is honestly stupid to get the cheaper one. A wireless controller and a hard drive come out to an extra 150 bucks. So if you got the cheap one and added those two items your 50 bucks over the price of the premium system.

Assuming the "cheaper" PS3 launches at 420.00. Are the only differences gonna be the size of the hard drives? There has got to be more different to justify spending the extra money on the more expensive system. I mean, they cant just sell the 60 gig hard drive for 180 bucks, could they?
LOL.. almost did

I honestly got the higher 360 b/c of two things... HDTV support out of the box and the wireless controller. That was really it. Bigger HD was a perk .

Right now looks like the PS3 prices are staying the same for the US ($499 and $599). If they do decide to drop the price, I'd expect both prices to fall. Don't want to rob Peter to pay Paul... which is pretty much what would happen if they dropped the price of one and not the other for the exact reasons you mentioned. The more expensive unit has the larger hard drive and WiFi built in. Seems like that's about it.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #665  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by Silver™
And MemoryStick/SD/CompactFlash compatibility.
Literally just read that 1 minute ago and coming to edit my post. That was weird...
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #666  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by ViperrepiV
what do you think you'll use the storage space for?
Depends what I end up doing with the 360. If I use the 360 as my media center, then I won't need the bigger HD on the PS3.

I also may set the 360 up in the bonus room on the 720p TV, and have the PS3 downstairs in the great room on a 1080p set... so if I do that, I may setup both as media centers which means I'd get the PS3 with the larger HD. We'll see.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #667  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,385
Likes: 3,068
From: Appleton WI
Hopefully modding the PS3 will be something fairly easy (as to say add a Larger HD of our own)??



Oh and ill be buying the larger ps3 when it comes out. (already saved and cleared purchase with teh GF)
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #668  
Silver™'s Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 37,312
Likes: 337
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by juniorbean
I'm sure there's a difference with writing it to XBOX Live and writing it to the PS3 online system. Why they took it out... who knows... and honestly, who cares? I downloaded the free demo of the game on XBOX Live and deleted it 15 minutes later.

Now, if they start announcing that EA Sports is removing all online play from the PS3, then I'd start to worry (and wouldn't' buy a PS3).

You would think the network details would have been finalized moths ago...



According to a Finnish website, the PS3 version of Virtua Tennis 3 will not feature an online mode. Apparently, Producer Mie Kumagai from Sega said that Sony has not delivered the necessary information about their online network to make coding the online mode possible. Rumor mill for now, but since this exaclty scenario happened with Tony Hawk's Project 8 as well, we believe it.

http://www.gamersreports.com/news/3970
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #669  
ghost_masterCL's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in Denver, CO
Originally Posted by Silver™
You would think the network details would have been finalized moths ago...
that's what I'm talking about with specs. Not hardware specs, but how is their online going to work? Is it something put together by sony similar to xbox live or another free-for-all like ps2? how is the user interface going to work? How many systems are expected to fail of the launch batch?

keep in mind the online components of the Wii are also technically not completely released, but from some leaked info it appears it will be similar to xbox live.

Last edited by ghost_masterCL; Sep 26, 2006 at 07:28 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #670  
gocubsgo55's Avatar
101 years of heartache...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
From: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Originally Posted by Silver™
And MemoryStick/SD/CompactFlash compatibility.
ok sold! wi-fi + 40 GB + compatable with my parents' camera
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #671  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by Silver™
You would think the network details would have been finalized moths ago...
Originally Posted by ghost_masterCL
that's what I'm talking about with specs. Not hardware specs, but how is their online going to work? Is it something put together by sony similar to xbox live or another free-for-all like ps2?
Not sure why you guys haven't heard anything ... I've known about the network for months, as have many, many others. And unless something changes (which is possible depending on costs) it will be free to play online. Gamespot has had pretty much all of this info and more on their site since E3 2005, which is why I can't understand why so many people claim everything is secret and nothing is finalized when the info has been out for a very long time. Also not sure why the developers aren't aware of this. All of the EA Sports games planned for or around launch have online functionality and they don't have any problems. Even the GT:HD game is being designed around online play, and has screenshots of online menus... so not sure why Sega can't get their act together

From Gamespot's PS3 section (which also gets updated every time something changes, so it's always current):

The network will be similar to Microsoft's Xbox Live service and will provide community features such as personal login accounts, friends lists, avatars, matchmaking, and communication options, including instant messaging, as well as voice and video chat. The free basic service will include community features and online multiplayer gameplay. Xbox Live Silver, Microsoft's free basic service, provides community options, too, but Silver-level subscribers can only play massively multiplayer games online. Players must upgrade to a paid Xbox Live Gold service subscription to access online multiplayer gameplay for non-MMO games.

Sony's service will also offer Xbox Marketplace-like download functionality, and developers will be able to integrate shops directly into games, letting players buy items from within the game experience. Sony hasn't confirmed whether or not games will be available for download, but there won't be any hardware hurdles, as the PS3 will be able to play games directly from the system's hard-disk drive. In addition to microtransactions, Sony has suggested that the commerce service can also handle subscriptions. Sony plans to let game developers connect and run their own game servers on the network. Letting game companies charge subscription fees could help defray the cost of maintaining servers.



Originally Posted by ghost_masterCL
How many systems are expected to fail of the launch batch?
From what I read Sony's goal is to have one less system fail in the launch batch compared to MS... just so they can say they had a better launch


Originally Posted by ghost_masterCL
keep in mind the online components of the Wii are also technically not completely released, but from some leaked info it appears it will be similar to xbox live.
Funny how no one seems to complain about Nintendo's secrecy. Guess the MS fans aren't as threatened by the Wii as they are the PS3

.

Last edited by juniorbean; Sep 27, 2006 at 09:44 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #672  
Silver™'s Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 37,312
Likes: 337
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Not sure why you guys haven't heard anything ... I've known about the network for months, as have many, many others. And unless something changes (which is possible depending on costs) it will be free to play online. Gamespot has had pretty much all of this info and more on their site since E3 2005, which is why I can't understand why so many people claim everything is secret and nothing is finalized when the info has been out for a very long time. Also not sure why the developers aren't aware of this. All of the EA Sports games planned for or around launch have online functionality and they don't have any problems. Even the GT:HD game is being designed around online play, and has screenshots of online menus... so not sure why Sega can't get their act together

From Gamespot's PS3 section (which also gets updated every time something changes, so it's always current):

The network will be similar to Microsoft's Xbox Live service and will provide community features such as personal login accounts, friends lists, avatars, matchmaking, and communication options, including instant messaging, as well as voice and video chat. The free basic service will include community features and online multiplayer gameplay. Xbox Live Silver, Microsoft's free basic service, provides community options, too, but Silver-level subscribers can only play massively multiplayer games online. Players must upgrade to a paid Xbox Live Gold service subscription to access online multiplayer gameplay for non-MMO games.

Sony's service will also offer Xbox Marketplace-like download functionality, and developers will be able to integrate shops directly into games, letting players buy items from within the game experience. Sony hasn't confirmed whether or not games will be available for download, but there won't be any hardware hurdles, as the PS3 will be able to play games directly from the system's hard-disk drive. In addition to microtransactions, Sony has suggested that the commerce service can also handle subscriptions. Sony plans to let game developers connect and run their own game servers on the network. Letting game companies charge subscription fees could help defray the cost of maintaining servers.




From what I read Sony's goal is to have one less system fail in the launch batch compared to MS... just so they can say they had a better launch



Funny how no one seems to complain about Nintendo's secrecy. Guess the MS fans aren't as threatened by the Wii as they are the PS3

.




In theory Sony's network sounds good, but the problem that at least I am referring to is that the developers (not just Sega) are complaining about not having the specs so that they can make their games compatible.


Developer Neversoft has dropped online play from the PlayStation 3 version of Tony Hawk's Project 8, a key third-party launch title for Sony's next-gen console.

The developer has only recently received development kits for the PlayStation 3 and has not had time to implement online play ahead of the consoles' US and Japanese launch in November, according to an article on IGN.

"Neversoft is confident the PS3 version of the game will ship at launch in November, but it still hasn't received all of the software libraries and has no indication of how the online components will work on PS3, so it's not offering them," detailed the report.


http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=67694


To me that is just more evidence that Sony is rushing this and that to me raises the likelyhood of issues with the PS3 down the road, especially given Sony's recent quality issues
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #673  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
^ I hear ya... but it's just odd that those two games are the only two that are having problems with developing to the online system. Especially when some of the other ones with large launch and pre-Christmas titles like EA and Polyphony above aren't having issues. Makes you wonder if maybe Sony is playing favorites with some developers... . giving some the specs and not others?

Who knows. As long as I get my EA Sports games and GT with online play, I'm a happy guy Plus, I'm still using my launch day PS2... as are at least half a dozen of my friends... so at least thus far, I've never had a problem with Sony. Combine that with the fact that I'm not buying until spring and I'm confident I won't have any issues.

.

Last edited by juniorbean; Sep 27, 2006 at 09:59 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #674  
SwervinCL's Avatar
Nom Nom Nom Nom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 76
From: Universal City
Originally Posted by juniorbean
^ I hear ya... but it's just odd that those two games are the only two that are having problems with developing to the online system. Especially when some of the other ones with large launch and pre-Christmas titles like EA and Polyphony above aren't having issues. Makes you wonder if maybe Sony is playing favorites with some developers... . giving some the specs and not others?

Who knows. As long as I get my EA Sports games and GT with online play, I'm a happy guy Plus, I'm still using my launch day PS2... as are at least half a dozen of my friends... so at least thus far, I've never had a problem with Sony. Combine that with the fact that I'm not buying until spring and I'm confident I won't have any issues.

.
This is another thing that scares me with the PS3. I bought a release day PS2 (waited in line for 6 hours and the whole shabang). That PS2 went out about 2 years later, which forced me to buy a new one.

I dont want to spend the 600 bucks on a PS3 and have to buy another later down the road...
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #675  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
Originally Posted by SwervinCL
This is another thing that scares me with the PS3. I bought a release day PS2 (waited in line for 6 hours and the whole shabang). That PS2 went out about 2 years later, which forced me to buy a new one.

I dont want to spend the 600 bucks on a PS3 and have to buy another later down the road...
don't buy one then
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #676  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
more evidence that ppl are really just trying to bring PS3 down. I mean honestly I think they are just making sheit up.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=19982

Sony reveals PS3 software pricing for US

Matt Martin 11:26 27/09/2006

USD $59.99 titles listed on official website

Sony has revealed that the recommended retail price of games for its upcoming PlayStation 3 in North Amercia is USD $59.99 (EUR 47).

An official Sony website, SonyStyle.com, has a range of first-party and third-party developed titles for pre-order ahead of the launch on November 17th.

Blazing Angels: Squadrons of WWII, Call of Duty 3, Full Auto 2: Battlelines, Marvel: Ultimate Alliance, Sonic the Hedgehog, Tony Hawk’s Project 8 and Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom are all listed.

Microsoft currently sets an RRP of USD $59.99 for third-party Xbox 360 titles in the region, with first-party titles selling cheaper at USD $49.99 (EUR 39).

A spokesperson for Sony Computer Entertainment Europe refused to comment on the pricing of software.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #677  
Silver™'s Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 37,312
Likes: 337
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by srika
more evidence that ppl are really just trying to bring PS3 down. I mean honestly I think they are just making sheit up.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=19982

Weren't the Japanese prices also going to come in lower until last week's announcement?

With Sony hemoraging money they can only make a profit with perhipials/accessories and games. I don't think it would be out of the question for Sony to raise the prices of their games here too.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #678  
SwervinCL's Avatar
Nom Nom Nom Nom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 76
From: Universal City
Originally Posted by srika
don't buy one then
But but but, GTHD.......
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #679  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
Originally Posted by SwervinCL
But but but, GTHD.......
hahaha... seriously though I have a feeling that NONE of us will have a PS3 when it comes out... I think it will be VERY hard to get. Like crazy hard to get.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 01:12 PM
  #680  
SwervinCL's Avatar
Nom Nom Nom Nom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 76
From: Universal City
Originally Posted by srika
hahaha... seriously though I have a feeling that NONE of us will have a PS3 when it comes out... I think it will be VERY hard to get. Like crazy hard to get.
I wont wait in line again. Ill wait for a couple months till they work out bugs and till the initial mad release rush is over....
I refuse to wait in line, "just to be one of the first to have it"....
I bet we will be able to find JB in line!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.