Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

C&P Random Thread -

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-09-2013, 02:14 PM
  #6721  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
This is stupid. This will only help the sales of the sigma 50.



http://petapixel.com/2013/10/09/rumo...end-50mm-f1-8/
Old 10-09-2013, 02:22 PM
  #6722  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,378
Received 2,858 Likes on 1,423 Posts
Originally Posted by asianspec
This is stupid. This will only help the sales of the sigma 50.
or the Canon 50mm f1.2
Old 10-09-2013, 04:36 PM
  #6723  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,163
Received 5,972 Likes on 3,837 Posts
Originally Posted by asianspec
This is stupid. This will only help the sales of the sigma 50.



http://petapixel.com/2013/10/09/rumo...end-50mm-f1-8/
Glad I have mine.
Old 10-09-2013, 06:02 PM
  #6724  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
or the Canon 50mm f1.2
While it could, i don't see it though. its still expensive and on top of that its still has AF problem as well.

Originally Posted by pttl
Glad I have mine.
Yeah, i got mine so im good.
Old 10-09-2013, 06:10 PM
  #6725  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts
Meh ill still buy it.
Old 10-09-2013, 06:19 PM
  #6726  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,378
Received 2,858 Likes on 1,423 Posts
I can't speak for Nikon, but with this Canon news AND with Sony's 2 50mm f1.4 offerings, as mentioned by Jonathan, it really WILL help Sigma's 50mm f1.4 HSM

(Sony's offerings are either the Zeiss 50mm f1.4 @$1500 or their regular 50mm f1.4 which is a sub par lens, and it's not that cheap either, I think like around $450 MSRP. Right now there's a Sigma $100 rebate for their 50mm f1.4 HSM and it comes out to be $399, so it's even cheaper lol)
Old 10-09-2013, 06:22 PM
  #6727  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Yup. which Canon needs to rethink their marketing issues. giving less and charging more isn't gaining more revenue.
Old 10-09-2013, 07:48 PM
  #6728  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts
Well I'd still buy it if canon improves the optics/sharpness, which I'm sure they will do. Also put in the more reliable and better ring based USM motor instead of the micro USM motor in the current 50mm 1.4 (which IIRC is the only mid/high end prime to have and why the motor is known to break). And if the body is built better.

If they can do all those then I'd be ok with the loss of 2/3rd of a stop since I rarely would shoot that wide open.

Inclusion of IS would be a bonus to me.

Last edited by Mizouse; 10-09-2013 at 07:54 PM.
Old 10-09-2013, 08:18 PM
  #6729  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
i guess if it does happen. 50mm for canon won't be the cheapest lens on their market anymore.
Old 10-09-2013, 08:42 PM
  #6730  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts
Maybe they'll keep the thrifty fifty?

Like an IS and non-IS version?

Last edited by Mizouse; 10-09-2013 at 08:44 PM.
Old 10-09-2013, 09:02 PM
  #6731  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
I highly doubt Canon will drop the 50 1.8 "nifty/thrifty 50" - it's a gateway lens for people.
If all your prime options are $300+, I doubt a good chunk of people would ever experiment beyond the kit lenses.
Old 10-09-2013, 11:14 PM
  #6732  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,378
Received 2,858 Likes on 1,423 Posts
Originally Posted by einsatz
I highly doubt Canon will drop the 50 1.8 "nifty/thrifty 50" - it's a gateway lens for people.
If all your prime options are $300+, I doubt a good chunk of people would ever experiment beyond the kit lenses.
no, they are dropping the 50mm f1.4 for a higher quality f1.8
Old 10-10-2013, 08:19 AM
  #6733  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
Yeah - that's what I would expect... it's in line with other moves to go IS over wider aperture.

Do you guys think the 50 1.8 IS will be as sharp/sharper as the 1.4 at 1.8? Guess we'll have to see the MTF charts.
Old 10-10-2013, 08:21 AM
  #6734  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Anyone on trigger trap?

I think I'll get it since its only $29.

Been wanting an intervalometer for bulb mode and this does that and a lot more because its using my iPhone/iPad.
Hey Miz did you ever get the Triggertrap? How's it been working out?
Old 10-10-2013, 01:10 PM
  #6735  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts
ohh yea i did end up buying it, just havent used it yet.

but from when i fiddled around its pretty nice.
Old 10-11-2013, 09:14 PM
  #6736  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
I'm a few thousand views away from 1M total views on Flickr. I plotted the past year:



So basically the past 12 months have seen more views than all the previous years since I joined flickr.

That 100k+view spike was a pic that hit the frontpage on Reddit. Crazy.
Old 10-11-2013, 09:23 PM
  #6737  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Awesome. Great job.
Old 10-11-2013, 09:26 PM
  #6738  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Originally Posted by einsatz
Yeah - that's what I would expect... it's in line with other moves to go IS over wider aperture.

Do you guys think the 50 1.8 IS will be as sharp/sharper as the 1.4 at 1.8? Guess we'll have to see the MTF charts.
Here's my problem with it. knowing Canon. Anything prime and IS, is atleast 500 bucks or so. Sigma's 50 1.4 is right now 399 if im not mistaken when i last checked. Unless there is a significant improvement in optics id rather buy the sigma.
Old 10-13-2013, 11:49 PM
  #6739  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
good read. but he is right.

http://zarias.tumblr.com/post/639576...-for-portfolio

which led to this.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/zarias">@zarias</a> like those scum bags who steal Photo Shop and then bitch about their photos being stolen.</p>&mdash; ChrisHoodPhotography (@Chrishoodphotog) <a href="https://twitter.com/Chrishoodphotog/statuses/389504071683825664">October 13, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The following users liked this post:
jupitersolo (10-16-2013)
Old 10-14-2013, 12:06 AM
  #6740  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,378
Received 2,858 Likes on 1,423 Posts
There's always the TFP models in Model Mayhem

(as both you and Miz know, I sometimes hit up the "escort service" girls in backpack.com for boudoir photography. No $$$ involved and no "trades" )
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (10-14-2013)
Old 10-14-2013, 12:07 AM
  #6741  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Yeah i remember you saying that.
Old 10-14-2013, 12:20 AM
  #6742  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,150
Received 10,204 Likes on 5,200 Posts
article is spot on, you work with what you can afford.

and if you don't have a budget for it, there's plenty of TFP models out there. PLENTY. you just have to either know them or know how to approach them.
The following 2 users liked this post by srika:
asianspec (10-14-2013), Mizouse (10-14-2013)
Old 10-15-2013, 03:28 PM
  #6743  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
So Nikon sues Polaroid for copying the 1 series camera.

http://petapixel.com/2013/10/15/niko...ges-design-j1/


Nikon Sues Polaroid, Claims the iM1836 Infringes on the Design of the 1 Series


It’s not uncommon for cameras to look similar in this day and age. Even the Sony A7 and A7r, which haven’t even been released yet, are being described as “OM-D-like” by rumor sites. But at what point does “similarity” cross the line to “infringement.”

Well, if you need an example, just take a look at Polaroid’s iM1836, because Nikon is filing a lawsuit against the company and camera manufacturer Sakar International over just that.

Considering that both times we’ve covered the iM1836 — when it was first announced and when we got our mitts on it at CES — we felt the need to point out how ridiculously similar it looked to Nikon’s 1-series ILCs, we shouldn’t be surprised that Nikon is suing Polaroid for infringement.

According to a press release, Nikon “negotiated amicably” with Sakar behind the scenes to try and solve this problem outside of court, but the manufacturer would have none of it, and so the Japanese company has been forced to get litigious.

“Nikon makes a great effort to create designs that can be differentiated from other companies’ products,” explains the press release, “as well as to strongly deter the imitation of its designs.”

The camera company is seeking an injunction against Sakar for “infringement of the design patent and trade dress right” of the Nikon 1 series. If upheld, the injunction would prevent Sakar from further production or sale of the Polaroid iM1836. Although, to be honest, we’re not sure how well it was selling in the first place.
Old 10-16-2013, 02:43 PM
  #6744  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,150
Received 10,204 Likes on 5,200 Posts
B&H has the Canon 24-70 2.8 Mk2 on sale right now for $1699

http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/10/d...9-at-bh-photo/
Old 10-16-2013, 02:46 PM
  #6745  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts
FYI It's a $300 mail in rebate, so $1999 upfront
Old 10-16-2013, 04:55 PM
  #6746  
Burning Brakes
 
SaaBaaDoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: GA
Age: 48
Posts: 882
Received 478 Likes on 129 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
There's always the TFP models in Model Mayhem

(as both you and Miz know, I sometimes hit up the "escort service" girls in backpack.com for boudoir photography. No $$$ involved and no "trades" )
what is this site you speak of?
Old 10-16-2013, 05:22 PM
  #6747  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts


:wink:
Old 10-17-2013, 03:40 AM
  #6748  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts


The following 2 users liked this post by Mizouse:
is300eater (10-17-2013), SaaBaaDoo (10-18-2013)
Old 10-18-2013, 05:12 PM
  #6749  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,150
Received 10,204 Likes on 5,200 Posts


c089r84.jpg
Old 10-18-2013, 05:14 PM
  #6750  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
yeah i saw some like that since i was looking to purchase my own place. bastards.
Old 10-18-2013, 07:51 PM
  #6751  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts
Darn wide angle lenses
Old 10-18-2013, 08:13 PM
  #6752  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,378
Received 2,858 Likes on 1,423 Posts
FWIW, the bottom one doesn't look right either... almost as if they went the other way to make it look small...


This is the reason why I think I'll eventually pick up a tilt/shift lens, so I can do interior shots with little to no distortion
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (10-18-2013)
Old 10-18-2013, 10:17 PM
  #6753  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
To me they didn't use a wide angle and more like stretched the photo.
Old 10-19-2013, 11:21 PM
  #6754  
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
 
Steven Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes on 5,162 Posts
That's crazy Srika......
Old 10-22-2013, 01:54 AM
  #6755  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,231
Received 2,784 Likes on 1,984 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse


Terrible idea to borrow this 6D, now I really want one.

The white balance, color, DR and exposures are soooo much better/accurate....
And that's just with the small jpeg preview using the built in wifi

Ohh the 85L is nice, but a bit long for general use. I could see myself using a 50L or 35L
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (10-22-2013)
Old 10-22-2013, 02:09 AM
  #6756  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,150
Received 10,204 Likes on 5,200 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (10-22-2013)
Old 10-24-2013, 01:39 PM
  #6757  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Over the last few days I have been looking at a fair number of photos on 500px and Flickr, and all I have to say is....


The saturation slider should cost extra money.


So many people seem to get their picture to a good place in Post and then they look at it and say, "Well, if +5 on saturation is good, +25 must be better!"

My eyes hurt. Nearly any RAW capture could benefit form some tweaks, including saturation, but it IMO it should be used like habanero pepper in cooking. Sparingly, for fear of overpowering.
The following 2 users liked this post by stogie1020:
Mizouse (10-24-2013), Undying Dreams (10-24-2013)
Old 10-24-2013, 01:49 PM
  #6758  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,378
Received 2,858 Likes on 1,423 Posts
I don't use that slider much, if anything sometimes I DECRESS saturation for more of a vintage look
Old 10-24-2013, 01:52 PM
  #6759  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by stogie1020
Over the last few days I have been looking at a fair number of photos on 500px and Flickr, and all I have to say is....


The saturation slider should cost extra money.


So many people seem to get their picture to a good place in Post and then they look at it and say, "Well, if +5 on saturation is good, +25 must be better!"

My eyes hurt. Nearly any RAW capture could benefit form some tweaks, including saturation, but it IMO it should be used like habanero pepper in cooking. Sparingly, for fear of overpowering.
You can't look at places such as those and base that judgement. Each site handle each image in a different way. You have to know how the site handles your images to get what you want on it. How your viewing the site can be effected as well. Depending on which browser you use and the display, viewing a desktop on or laptop.

In the last year, one thing I have done for showing my images on flickr and FB. I have to bump a few things up, I don't post over 1200x and I post at either 72 or 96dpi. Anything over that gets down rez and looks like crap, with those two sites.

With that said, I know what you are saying.
Old 10-24-2013, 01:54 PM
  #6760  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Interesting point about adjusting the image for the site Jup, hadn't thought about that.

Having said that, some of the pics just simply hurt to look at... and they would have been (IMO) fantastic pics without the bump in saturation.


Quick Reply: C&P Random Thread -



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.