Monthly Car Sales news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2010, 09:32 PM
  #1561  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by JD23
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews..._s4/index.html

The TL did far better than I would have imagined; it was actually rated higher than the S4 in handling and steering. I don't agree with most of what SSFTSX has been saying, but there is some truth in his comments about the S4/TL comparison.
I see that publication as a joke. I have never cared for their reviews and articles. Half the time i honestly wonder if the ones doing the reviewing know how to drive.
Old 09-06-2010, 09:44 PM
  #1562  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by YetiTL
Really? I missed that part as most review talks about how the brakes are grwat (not suitable for track tough). Where have you read that, if I may ask?

Thanks!
-YetiTL
Like i said in my post, the 4g forum.
I did a quick search in the 4g forum, i had quite a few threads come up about warped brakes.
Old 09-07-2010, 10:27 AM
  #1563  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Like i said in my post, the 4g forum.
I did a quick search in the 4g forum, i had quite a few threads come up about warped brakes.
Luckily for me, I've had two 3G TLs both of which have had no brake or rotor issues what so ever, but I have seen threads on both the 3G and 4G discussions of people having issues.

I've read that the TSX has had even worse issues with pre-mature brake/rotor wear/problems.
Old 09-07-2010, 11:27 AM
  #1564  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by smarty666
Luckily for me, I've had two 3G TLs both of which have had no brake or rotor issues what so ever, but I have seen threads on both the 3G and 4G discussions of people having issues.

I've read that the TSX has had even worse issues with pre-mature brake/rotor wear/problems.
Every acura/honda product i have ever seen or driven has had warping rotor syndrome.
Old 09-07-2010, 05:02 PM
  #1565  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
....except for their motorcycles
Old 09-07-2010, 05:52 PM
  #1566  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
....except for their motorcycles
And lawn mowers. Oh wait, they dont have brakes (maybe the riding mower does) But my trans failed on my walk behind harmony if that says any thing about honda and auto trans.
Old 09-07-2010, 05:59 PM
  #1567  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,163
Received 5,972 Likes on 3,837 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
....except for their motorcycles
At the risk of encouraging a certain Honda fanboi.....Honda motorcycles are pretty darned good.
Old 09-08-2010, 02:57 PM
  #1568  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Interestingly, none of our 3 Integra GS-Rs, 4 S2000s or RSX have ever had warped rotors. Also never had a transmission fail (though I've never owned a slushbox). However, my current TSX is exhibiting some shudder under braking so I'm guessing I've stared to develop some warping. Only a few months left on the lease so I think I can live with it.
Old 09-08-2010, 06:10 PM
  #1569  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,049
Received 8,206 Likes on 4,845 Posts
Ive not noticed the warped rotors in many of the smaller cars (Civic, Integra), but the Accord/Pilots/Odysseys/CLs/TLs are notorious for it.
Old 09-08-2010, 10:56 PM
  #1570  
Registered but harmless
 
Will Y.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 14,844
Received 1,102 Likes on 763 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Every acura/honda product i have ever seen or driven has had warping rotor syndrome.
My experience is different.
Our Civic, 2G Odyssey and 3G TL never had any brake issues. My Integra developed one slightly warped disc in the first couple of months after purchase; the dealer machined it and it had no further brake issues thereafter.
Old 09-09-2010, 06:42 AM
  #1571  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,325
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
At the risk of encouraging a certain Honda fanboi.....Honda motorcycles are pretty darned good.
+1
Old 09-09-2010, 12:12 PM
  #1572  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
I had brake issues on both my Accord and TSX.
Old 09-10-2010, 08:13 PM
  #1573  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
confirmation of what i posted before. excellent ground clearance and offraod ability.
ZDX is no less than Q5.






Old 09-10-2010, 08:25 PM
  #1574  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
^ How about posting the article that goes with those pictures.
Old 09-10-2010, 10:34 PM
  #1575  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,049
Received 8,206 Likes on 4,845 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
confirmation of what i posted before. excellent ground clearance and offraod ability.
ZDX is no less than Q5.
How deep do you go up your ass to pull out such outlandish comments?

Audi Q7 Ground Clearance: 8.1"
http://autos.aol.com/cars-Audi-Q7-2010/specs/

Acura ZDX Ground Clearance: 6.5"
http://autos.aol.com/cars-Acura-ZDX-2010/specs/

Clearly, less is more
Old 09-10-2010, 10:44 PM
  #1576  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
yawn.... is it me or the more desperate South San Francisco TSX gets with outlandish posts the more boring this becomes?

It was definitely better when he would just post some off the wall shit we'd come back prove him wrong and move to the next thing to argue about. It's just not as fun anymore.
Old 09-11-2010, 01:02 AM
  #1577  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
How deep do you go up your ass to pull out such outlandish comments?

Audi Q7 Ground Clearance: 8.1"
http://autos.aol.com/cars-Audi-Q7-2010/specs/

Acura ZDX Ground Clearance: 6.5"
http://autos.aol.com/cars-Acura-ZDX-2010/specs/

Clearly, less is more
Less is more when you rely on AOL data.
Q5 uses 18inch standard with larger section. ZDX has more space for rising the height.
ZDX has high ground clearance even if you looked by our own naked eyes.

These very tall and wide tires with still large wheel well left Not tires of a coupe. as coupe is never going to use 50 section on 19inch.




Old 09-11-2010, 03:06 AM
  #1578  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
http://autos.aol.com/cars-Audi-Q5-2010/specs/

Q5 has 7.9 inches

I thought I would post this since its so important to Monthly Car Sales
Old 09-11-2010, 09:22 AM
  #1579  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
lol
Old 09-11-2010, 11:02 AM
  #1580  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,163
Received 5,972 Likes on 3,837 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
WOW! Maybe we've finally found what the Power Plenum is good for...plowing through muddy water!
Old 09-11-2010, 12:09 PM
  #1581  
Safety Car
 
TSX69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 4,789
Received 1,400 Likes on 704 Posts
Post Days on the Lot


August car sales dipped a bit against last year’s Cash for Clunkers and things slowed down on the Movers and Losers list, too. The average number of days it took to sell a new car was 57.8, up from 56 in July. That’s far better than the number of 82 days it took in August 2009.

In an odd bit of hybrid irony, Honda’s new CR-Z hybrid topped the Movers list, while the 2010 Honda Insight hybrid took 95 days to sell, making it one of our picks for consumers looking for deals on slow-selling models.

On the Losers list, the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback retained the top spot and 5 other cars also remain from July's Losers list. The lists and our methodology are listed below.
Movers

* 2011 Honda CR-Z: 5 days
* 2011 Chevy Equinox: 6 days
* 2011 Ford Fusion: 6 days
* 2011 GMC Terrain: 6 days
* 2011 Land Rover Range Rover Sport: 7 days
* 2011 Infiniti QX56: 8 days
* 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300: 8 days
* 2011 Toyota Tacoma: 8 days
* 2011 Audi A5 coupe: 9 days
* 2011 Cadillac SRX: 9 days
* 2011 Ford Escape: 9 days
* 2011 VW Jetta SportWagen: 9 days


Losers

* 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback: 207 days
* 2010 Scion xD: 189 days
* 2010 Suzuki SX4 Sportback: 188 days
* 2010 Ford Transit Connect: 161 days
* 2010 Mazda RX-8: 152 days
* 2010 Mercury Mariner Hybrid: 145 days
* 2010 Lexus HS 250h: 129 days
* 2010 Mazda MX-5: 117 days
* 2010 Kia Optima: 107 days
* 2010 Acura RL: 106 days

Old 09-11-2010, 12:16 PM
  #1582  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,664
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
who the hell is snapping up those ugly Infiniti QX's?!

i saw one on the road, the thing is ginormous...and ugly
Old 09-11-2010, 12:24 PM
  #1583  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
The QX is a freaking tank, I didn't like the way the previous gen looked either
Old 09-11-2010, 01:08 PM
  #1584  
Three Wheelin'
 
alex2364's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,666
Received 63 Likes on 37 Posts
The CR-Z is gonna be on the losers list by the end of the year.
Old 09-11-2010, 02:46 PM
  #1585  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
http://autos.aol.com/cars-Audi-Q5-2010/specs/

Q5 has 7.9 inches

I thought I would post this since its so important to Monthly Car Sales
this is just one of criteria. ZDX has similar ground clearance.

The following are important features for offroad ability,
lighter weight. power to weight ratio. not as heavy as LX/QX. too much weight

Approach and departure angle. ZDX has larger overhangs than Q5/X5 but overhangs curve upwards so dont effect the capability.

Short wheel base (look at historic Jeep) and tight turning circle. Short wheel base with oversize 19inch standard rubber add the most to offroad ability along with large wheel wells for individual wheel movement.

Q5/X5 both has larger wheel bases for standard tire size. They need 20inch to be comparable to ZDX 19inch. and that adds to weight and hindered individual wheel movement on wheel wells on extreme rocks.
sophistication of AWD system to balance power-torque distribution is more important in snow/desert
Old 09-11-2010, 03:22 PM
  #1586  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,049
Received 8,206 Likes on 4,845 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
this is just one of criteria. ZDX has similar ground clearance.

The following are important features for offroad ability,
lighter weight. power to weight ratio. not as heavy as LX/QX. too much weight

Approach and departure angle. ZDX has larger overhangs than Q5/X5 but overhangs curve upwards so dont effect the capability.

Short wheel base (look at historic Jeep) and tight turning circle. Short wheel base with oversize 19inch standard rubber add the most to offroad ability along with large wheel wells for individual wheel movement.

Q5/X5 both has larger wheel bases for standard tire size. They need 20inch to be comparable to ZDX 19inch. and that adds to weight and hindered individual wheel movement on wheel wells on extreme rocks.
sophistication of AWD system to balance power-torque distribution is more important in snow/desert
Im just speechless. You've astounded me with your logic (most call it stupidity).

I really feel bad for whomever asks you about car buying choices.
Old 09-11-2010, 04:05 PM
  #1587  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ingoring the idiot that is SSFTSX and getting back on topic, I noticed the Kizashi has been a failure month after month.

Camry 30,764
Accord 25,148

Sonata 21,399
Altima 18,491
Malibu 18,182
Fusion 17,082
Sebring 4,498
Impreza 3,801

Mazda6 2,811
Optima 1,714
Passat 1,669
Kizashi 478


Courtesy of TSX69

Too small and not from a brand that many buyers can think of.
Old 09-11-2010, 04:29 PM
  #1588  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
this is just one of criteria. ZDX has similar ground clearance.

The following are important features for offroad ability,
lighter weight. power to weight ratio. not as heavy as LX/QX. too much weight

Approach and departure angle. ZDX has larger overhangs than Q5/X5 but overhangs curve upwards so dont effect the capability.

Short wheel base (look at historic Jeep) and tight turning circle. Short wheel base with oversize 19inch standard rubber add the most to offroad ability along with large wheel wells for individual wheel movement.

Q5/X5 both has larger wheel bases for standard tire size. They need 20inch to be comparable to ZDX 19inch. and that adds to weight and hindered individual wheel movement on wheel wells on extreme rocks.
sophistication of AWD system to balance power-torque distribution is more important in snow/desert


None of this has anything to do with monthly sales. Take those posts to the ZDX thread.
Old 09-11-2010, 06:39 PM
  #1589  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,163
Received 5,972 Likes on 3,837 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
Ingoring the idiot that is SSFTSX and getting back on topic, I noticed the Kizashi has been a failure month after month.

Camry 30,764
Accord 25,148

Sonata 21,399
Altima 18,491
Malibu 18,182
Fusion 17,082
Sebring 4,498
Impreza 3,801

Mazda6 2,811
Optima 1,714
Passat 1,669
Kizashi 478


Courtesy of TSX69

Too small and not from a brand that many buyers can think of.
Have you ever seen a Kizashi? There is a Suzuki dealer not far from me. So when the car first came out, following all the hoopla, I went to see it. When I got there I thought..."this is it? wtf?"
Old 09-11-2010, 06:55 PM
  #1590  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
this is just one of criteria. ZDX has similar ground clearance.

The following are important features for offroad ability,
lighter weight. power to weight ratio. not as heavy as LX/QX. too much weight

Approach and departure angle. ZDX has larger overhangs than Q5/X5 but overhangs curve upwards so dont effect the capability.

Short wheel base (look at historic Jeep) and tight turning circle. Short wheel base with oversize 19inch standard rubber add the most to offroad ability along with large wheel wells for individual wheel movement.

Q5/X5 both has larger wheel bases for standard tire size. They need 20inch to be comparable to ZDX 19inch. and that adds to weight and hindered individual wheel movement on wheel wells on extreme rocks.
sophistication of AWD system to balance power-torque distribution is more important in snow/desert
Old 09-11-2010, 06:57 PM
  #1591  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,049
Received 8,206 Likes on 4,845 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
Have you ever seen a Kizashi? There is a Suzuki dealer not far from me. So when the car first came out, following all the hoopla, I went to see it. When I got there I thought..."this is it? wtf?"
Agreed. The concept was actually pretty cool. But then when it was released it looked alot like the outgoing Jetta.

Concept:





What we get:


Last edited by civicdrivr; 09-11-2010 at 06:59 PM.
Old 09-11-2010, 08:04 PM
  #1592  
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
 
Pure Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area
Age: 42
Posts: 12,434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
And lawn mowers. Oh wait, they dont have brakes (maybe the riding mower does) But my trans failed on my walk behind harmony if that says any thing about honda and auto trans.
Now I'm starting to think that it's just you.
Old 09-11-2010, 08:54 PM
  #1593  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Pure Adrenaline
Now I'm starting to think that it's just you.
Hey, some were known to have issues.
Old 09-11-2010, 09:45 PM
  #1594  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,664
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
Agreed. The concept was actually pretty cool. But then when it was released it looked alot like the outgoing Jetta.
I hope they learn from this, cause that concept was a gorgeous car that could've went into production without being altered that much to meet safety/crash ratings.

and instead they dangled a carrot in front of us and replaced it with when reached for it. there was no reason why it had to come to market looking like a Hyundai Jetta.
Old 09-12-2010, 12:42 AM
  #1595  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
I hope they learn from this, cause that concept was a gorgeous car that could've went into production without being altered that much to meet safety/crash ratings.
There's a lot more to it than crash and safety ratings. You still have to be able to mass produce the car. This means that your dies and tooling need to be able to stamp the sheet metal and have it release from the mold properly. The sharper the creases, the thinner than metal gets at the bending point. This makes stamping many "show cars" difficult if not impossible on a mass production basis
Old 09-12-2010, 06:34 AM
  #1596  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
who the hell is snapping up those ugly Infiniti QX's?!

i saw one on the road, the thing is ginormous...and ugly
I saw on yesterday at Ray Catena Infiniti in Bridgewater, NJ and they are pretty ugly. That said, the mag reviews are very positive with a couple putting it up on pedestel as one of the best all around luxury SUVs in production.

But I'll bet on one thing: The quality of the 2G QX shouldn't be as bad as the first seeing as the new one is now based off the Nissan Patrol and is produced in Japan (as opposed to the Armada being produced in Canton, Mississippi).
Old 09-12-2010, 06:37 AM
  #1597  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by TSX69

August car sales dipped a bit against last year’s Cash for Clunkers and things slowed down on the Movers and Losers list, too. The average number of days it took to sell a new car was 57.8, up from 56 in July. That’s far better than the number of 82 days it took in August 2009.

In an odd bit of hybrid irony, Honda’s new CR-Z hybrid topped the Movers list, while the 2010 Honda Insight hybrid took 95 days to sell, making it one of our picks for consumers looking for deals on slow-selling models.

On the Losers list, the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback retained the top spot and 5 other cars also remain from July's Losers list. The lists and our methodology are listed below.
Movers

* 2011 Honda CR-Z: 5 days
* 2011 Chevy Equinox: 6 days
* 2011 Ford Fusion: 6 days
* 2011 GMC Terrain: 6 days
* 2011 Land Rover Range Rover Sport: 7 days
* 2011 Infiniti QX56: 8 days
* 2011 Mercedes-Benz C300: 8 days
* 2011 Toyota Tacoma: 8 days
* 2011 Audi A5 coupe: 9 days
* 2011 Cadillac SRX: 9 days
* 2011 Ford Escape: 9 days
* 2011 VW Jetta SportWagen: 9 days


Losers

* 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback: 207 days
* 2010 Scion xD: 189 days
* 2010 Suzuki SX4 Sportback: 188 days
* 2010 Ford Transit Connect: 161 days
* 2010 Mazda RX-8: 152 days
* 2010 Mercury Mariner Hybrid: 145 days
* 2010 Lexus HS 250h: 129 days
* 2010 Mazda MX-5: 117 days
* 2010 Kia Optima: 107 days
* 2010 Acura RL: 106 days

I have this feeling that the CR-Z will appeal to the green crowd of Prius buyers who want something ostensibly sportier (if not actually sportier), with the idea being to stand out as a tree hugger even moreso.

Still waiting for an AV6h within the 8G lineup.
Old 09-12-2010, 09:19 AM
  #1598  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,921
Received 4,105 Likes on 2,550 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
There's a lot more to it than crash and safety ratings. You still have to be able to mass produce the car. This means that your dies and tooling need to be able to stamp the sheet metal and have it release from the mold properly. The sharper the creases, the thinner than metal gets at the bending point. This makes stamping many "show cars" difficult if not impossible on a mass production basis
Yep, and another factor is the sharp bend radius cause alot more distortion in the metal crystal structure causing stress cracks. Even bends are too sharp they result in weaker structures.
Old 09-12-2010, 09:53 AM
  #1599  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,163
Received 5,972 Likes on 3,837 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
Yep, and another factor is the sharp bend radius cause alot more distortion in the metal crystal structure causing stress cracks. Even bends are too sharp they result in weaker structures.
Then why show us a concept, knowing full well, that they can't produce the car? The public will ultimately be disappointed and the car will sell like

Old 09-12-2010, 11:09 AM
  #1600  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,325
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
Then why show us a concept, knowing full well, that they can't produce the car? The public will ultimately be disappointed and the car will sell like

Because the production line doesn't get a say in the design. Produce-ability is an afterthought. A lot of the changes in concept to production are in the front and rear fascias that don't have the limitations of metal. It's not that the concept can't be produced, it's probably just too expensive to do so.


Quick Reply: Monthly Car Sales news



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.