View Poll Results: What do you like Better?
Accord Concept Rims and Bodykit
54
73.97%
2004 Acura TL A-Spec Bodykit and Rims
19
26.03%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Honda: Accord News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2007, 08:35 AM
  #1241  
Burning Brakes
 
deandorsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: CT
Age: 44
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Get a closer glimpse of the Accord Coupe Concept at the following auto shows:
Detroit Auto Show 1/13/07 - 1/21/06
Atlanta Auto Show 3/10/07 - 3/18/07
it will only be the concept already shown, no new news there
Old 03-14-2007, 08:42 AM
  #1242  
Racer
 
Texas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, TX
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^ yes i know but you missed my statement of trying to garner some info...there will be some one there to talk to...long shot i know...
Old 03-14-2007, 08:43 AM
  #1243  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Honda is good at concealing or keeping pictures of the next Accord sedan a secret. That CGI isn't the final product of course. Whereas, Toyota and Nissan they are more open to showing their next gen cars well over a year in advance before the car is released. Examples are the Altima coupe, Camry, and the IS
Old 03-14-2007, 08:56 AM
  #1244  
Racer
 
Texas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, TX
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Texas
^^^ yes i know but you missed my statement of trying to garner some info...there will be some one there to talk to...long shot i know...
^^^
Old 03-17-2007, 12:02 PM
  #1245  
To punish and enslave
 
TL CHROMETIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TOV got some info:

Originally Posted by Temple of VTec
FMC, A-VTEC to appear, 280hp (or more) 3.5L V6. 4cyl model said to have 180hp, possibly a 200hp "Special Edition"
Link:

http://www.vtec.net/modelmatrix/
Old 03-17-2007, 12:03 PM
  #1246  
To punish and enslave
 
TL CHROMETIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is Honda still sending the power to the front for the Accord?
Old 03-17-2007, 05:53 PM
  #1247  
Chloe @ 17mo
 
AsianRage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 3,931
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TL CHROMETIDE
Is Honda still sending the power to the front for the Accord?
Until both Camry and Altima goes RWD, I wouldn't expect otherwise.
Old 03-17-2007, 06:04 PM
  #1248  
Burning Brakes
 
MaximaPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont understand why the accord will have nearly same power as TL type S, unless the next TL is going to have over 300hp...so i'd say if this is tru bout the accord then shawd will be in the next TL to handle power
Old 03-17-2007, 07:17 PM
  #1249  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 630 Likes on 506 Posts
I don't see those HP numbers happening - Honda just keeps up, it doesn't get into HP wars.

The TSX intro date is possible but that would mean virtually no MY08 - info should be out by the Frankfurt auto show (sept?).

I think the diesel will make it into more models.
Old 03-17-2007, 11:50 PM
  #1250  
Burning Brakes
 
MaximaPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
........ it doesn't get into HP wars.
that's wat toyota said
Old 03-18-2007, 12:12 PM
  #1251  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
well, the past 3 generations of accords have had more hp than the camry so 280hp sounds about right
Old 03-18-2007, 03:09 PM
  #1252  
Racer
 
Texas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, TX
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torque around 240-250 or at least TL level of 233 would be nice....while wishing...sport shift for us A/T fans..then if the coupe of 4-dr Accord does not suit you ...Acura will have to push up..wins for all...
Old 03-18-2007, 05:13 PM
  #1253  
Burning Brakes
 
MaximaPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Texas
Torque around 240-250 or at least TL level of 233 would be nice....while wishing...sport shift for us A/T fans..then if the coupe of 4-dr Accord does not suit you ...Acura will have to push up..wins for all...
is this english?
Old 03-18-2007, 06:37 PM
  #1254  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 630 Likes on 506 Posts
Originally Posted by MaximaPower
that's wat toyota said
They weren't going for HP wars - it was convenient to whore out the existing 3.5L V6 - if they had a lesser modern V6 they would have used it. Of course the same thing could happen with the Accord. A 3.5L V6 seems to be what everyone is providing these days. But with the weight gains all sedans seem to be having I don't foresee a great improvement in millage nor performance.
Old 03-18-2007, 07:45 PM
  #1255  
Burning Brakes
 
MaximaPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
They weren't going for HP wars - it was convenient to whore out the existing 3.5L V6 - if they had a lesser modern V6 they would have used it. Of course the same thing could happen with the Accord. A 3.5L V6 seems to be what everyone is providing these days. But with the weight gains all sedans seem to be having I don't foresee a great improvement in millage nor performance.
toyo's 3.5 is pretty brand new....also, they had a very short lived 3.3 V6...if they weren't going for HP, that 3.3 would have done just fine
Old 03-18-2007, 10:05 PM
  #1256  
Racer
 
Texas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, TX
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MaximaPower
is this english?
Kings for some...sorry old chap...
Old 03-19-2007, 08:52 AM
  #1257  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 630 Likes on 506 Posts
Originally Posted by MaximaPower
toyo's 3.5 is pretty brand new....also, they had a very short lived 3.3 V6...if they weren't going for HP, that 3.3 would have done just fine
But that 3.3 was of a very old design and was being dropped across the board. They just don't have anything else between the ~170HP 4 cyl and the 3.5L V6 that will be whored out into a lot of vehicles they make.

Honda doesn't have anything either and they'll end up in the same boat - their 3.5L V6 will used in everything bigger than a Civic (even if those HP levels are not needed). The only diff being is that A-VTEC might buy them a few HP and some millage improvement (most of which will be lost to increased weight)
Old 03-19-2007, 11:46 AM
  #1258  
Burning Brakes
 
MaximaPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
But that 3.3 was of a very old design and was being dropped across the board. They just don't have anything else between the ~170HP 4 cyl and the 3.5L V6 that will be whored out into a lot of vehicles they make.

Honda doesn't have anything either and they'll end up in the same boat - their 3.5L V6 will used in everything bigger than a Civic (even if those HP levels are not needed). The only diff being is that A-VTEC might buy them a few HP and some millage improvement (most of which will be lost to increased weight)
very old design? how u figure?
3.3 was whored out as well....toyo made a bigger engine to keep up or even be ahead of competition....they said they weren't getting into the hp war but they did...nissans 3.5 lasted longer than toyos 3.3
Old 03-19-2007, 03:36 PM
  #1259  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,183
Received 1,146 Likes on 818 Posts
Originally Posted by AsianRage
Until both Camry and Altima goes RWD, I wouldn't expect otherwise.
Not likely because the Accord, Camry, and Altima are family sedans that stress price and safety rather than performance. RWD layout adds more cost and complexity to a car. FWD configuration is more forgiving to the average family orientated drivers due to its tendency to understeer rather than oversteer. FWD is more capable in the snow and ice in an all-year-round family car.

People looking for performance sedans can look at the TL, GSxxx, and G35. So family sedans will remain to be FWD (or AWD) for years to come.
Old 03-19-2007, 03:52 PM
  #1260  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,183
Received 1,146 Likes on 818 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
But that 3.3 was of a very old design and was being dropped across the board. They just don't have anything else between the ~170HP 4 cyl and the 3.5L V6 that will be whored out into a lot of vehicles they make.

Honda doesn't have anything either and they'll end up in the same boat - their 3.5L V6 will used in everything bigger than a Civic (even if those HP levels are not needed). The only diff being is that A-VTEC might buy them a few HP and some millage improvement (most of which will be lost to increased weight)
Honda is very good at tuning big horsepower out of small engines (torque otherwise). It's philosphy is to be enviromental friendly, use the smallest engine possible to do the job, and to maintain a high fleet mileage among other auto makers. In fact, it has the highest fleet mileage among all auto makers, thanks to the abudently-used 4 cylinder's and the absence of V8's.

See how long it took the Civic line to go from 1.5 to 1.6 to 1.8 to now 2.0 liters of displacement, and how the Accord V6 remains to be 3L over the years but just crank up the horsepower to match competitions. Only in the heavy van and trucks that the 3.5V6 is used due to high engine torque demands in heavier vehicles which hauls people and pull loads, until the debuts of larger displacement diesel or turbo-diesel engines not too long from now.
Old 03-20-2007, 07:57 AM
  #1261  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 630 Likes on 506 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
See how long it took the Civic line to go from 1.5 to 1.6 to 1.8 to now 2.0 liters of displacement, and how the Accord V6 remains to be 3L over the years but just crank up the horsepower to match competitions. Only in the heavy van and trucks that the 3.5V6 is used due to high engine torque demands in heavier vehicles which hauls people and pull loads, until the debuts of larger displacement diesel or turbo-diesel engines not too long from now.
But in terms of design the current crop of engines other than the 3.5 are somewhat dated and if Honda decides to only add A-VTEC to the 3.5 engine and whore that out across the line the Accord might end up with it instead of something smaller. Trying to get 280HP out of the 3.0 or 3.2 engines is getting up there near the 100HP/l mark where they have to start using expensive trickery to get more HP. I think all makers realize Nissan had it right - design something really good and whore it out across the line (even if it's too much or too little for the application) to save costs.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:16 AM
  #1262  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Isn't the 3.5L dated as well?
Old 03-20-2007, 11:21 AM
  #1263  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
As long as the motor started out as a good, solid motor (i.e.: J30A1, VQ30DE) and continuously developed as the years progressed (i.e.: J35A, VQ35HR) then, there is no reason to abandon it in favor of something new just for newness sake.

With all due respect to Toyota, the MZ motor was never in the same league as the J series or VQ; something new (i.e.: 2GR) was definitely needed. The same need not be said for the VQ and J.

That said, I do think it is important to differentiate between "dated" and "venerable".
Old 03-20-2007, 05:33 PM
  #1264  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
^venerable, yes! When I think of dated I think of the JZ engine.... relatively few upgrades for the long period of time that it has been around. Also, its a OHC engine with an iron block.... how often do you see those around nowadays? Then again it didn't really need much upgrades, Toyota just left it to the imagination of all the tuners out there...

I don't get all this talk about Toyota's MZ and Nissan's VQ or even Honda's J engines being dated, at all. The 3.3 MZ was first used in 2003-2004 in the Highlander and Camry, Nissan's VQ has constantly been updated with changes year after year, including displacement increases and power improvements, and the same goes for Honda's J series.
Old 03-20-2007, 07:46 PM
  #1265  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,183
Received 1,146 Likes on 818 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
But in terms of design the current crop of engines other than the 3.5 are somewhat dated and if Honda decides to only add A-VTEC to the 3.5 engine and whore that out across the line the Accord might end up with it instead of something smaller. Trying to get 280HP out of the 3.0 or 3.2 engines is getting up there near the 100HP/l mark where they have to start using expensive trickery to get more HP. I think all makers realize Nissan had it right - design something really good and whore it out across the line (even if it's too much or too little for the application) to save costs.
Honda may not be the best in building cars, but it is the best in building engines. There is still FSI and turbo-charging, to name a few, that can be applied to the 3.0V6 to squeeze out more horsepower. For Honda, that's a no brainer. The major obstacle is how to use all that horsepower on a FWD car without negatively affecting the driverability and handling dynamics.
Old 04-12-2007, 07:14 PM
  #1266  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 Accord Coupe Spied on Camera Phone

http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=673444

Date: April 12, 2007 19:57
Submitted by: Jeff
Source: HowardForums via Sanjay Mehta
Credibility Rating: Not Specified


Somebody just sent this link to us. Too bad 'wizard8873' didn't contact us first - he/she could have made a few bucks.

Click the pic to see the rest of the photos in their full resolution.



I don't know about you, but if this is really the Accord 08 coupe, it really looks a lot less aggressive (imo) than the Accord concept.
Old 04-12-2007, 07:17 PM
  #1267  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Its disguised still. Lots of white tape on the front, rear and side glass area. Dunno if those wheels will make it to production or not.
Old 04-12-2007, 07:20 PM
  #1268  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1143586

That is the place where I clicked on vtec and where there are more pics of the 08 Accord coupe
Old 04-12-2007, 07:23 PM
  #1269  
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
mg7726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,913
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
spyshots of the new accord,

howard forums: http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1143586
and
vtec.net: http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=673444
Old 04-12-2007, 07:23 PM
  #1270  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pics



Old 04-12-2007, 07:24 PM
  #1271  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I like the front, not so much the back...but I'll reserve judgement till the production model comes out.
Old 04-12-2007, 07:25 PM
  #1272  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mg7726
how do you like it? i just saw pics too and it doesn't look as aggressive as the concept. but, its still has white tape on it so maybe that's why.
Old 04-12-2007, 11:54 PM
  #1273  
hail to the victors
 
chungkopi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
noice!
Old 04-13-2007, 08:21 AM
  #1274  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I love the profile of the car. If it has the rumored 280HP this will be a big success for Honda.
Old 04-13-2007, 09:21 AM
  #1275  
Senior Moderator
 
GreenMonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Swansea, MA
Age: 57
Posts: 35,218
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
I like it, but it also makes me sad... If the accord is this good Acura has no reason to come out with a replacement for the CL
Old 04-13-2007, 09:25 AM
  #1276  
Missing My CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
SG81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 11,376
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
not bad, but it reminds me of a Solara
Old 04-13-2007, 09:35 AM
  #1277  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
I like it, but it also makes me sad... If the accord is this good Acura has no reason to come out with a replacement for the CL

If the Acura version is AWD or RWD they have all the reason in the world.

From what we've seen so far, the Accord coupe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Altima coupe. IMO.
Old 04-13-2007, 09:54 AM
  #1278  
Senior Moderator
 
West6MT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 9,234
Received 165 Likes on 127 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
If the Acura version is AWD or RWD they have all the reason in the world.

From what we've seen so far, the Accord coupe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Altima coupe. IMO.
X 2
Old 04-13-2007, 10:12 AM
  #1279  
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
mg7726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,913
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up looks good...so far

Originally Posted by 04EuroAccordTsx
how do you like it? i just saw pics too and it doesn't look as aggressive as the concept. but, its still has white tape on it so maybe that's why.
me likey.

i hope honda 1) gets rid of the rice lights a la altima, late model mdx, and pilot - they're ghetto; 2) put back the concept bumper for the exhaust - or make it a HFP option; 3) an upgraded interior; 4) increase the upward angle on the lip spoiler a little; 5) love the huge rear windshield - loads of visibility.

Originally Posted by dom
...From what we've seen so far, the Accord coupe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Altima coupe. IMO.
yes!
Old 04-13-2007, 10:32 AM
  #1280  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by SG81
not bad, but it reminds me of a Solara
That rear shot screams Solara.
The front still does not appear to flow with the rest of the car.
I'll reserve judgement until the camo comes off, but I have a feeling it's gonna be too dumbed down from the concept.
I hope it's not


Quick Reply: Honda: Accord News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.