Acura: Development and Technology News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2009, 02:18 PM
  #1841  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,072
Received 753 Likes on 453 Posts
What bothers me most about Acura's insistance on FWD is not that the front wheels are driven... it's that the front overhangs are just HUGE. All the cars are starting to look like rhinos.

The main reason I decided to go for an A4 is that here's a car that doesn't have that problem, it doesn't have the huge nose.
Old 07-21-2009, 02:28 PM
  #1842  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Infiniti isn't perfect, they have their warts. They don't have an entry level sedan or a mainstream SUV like an MDX or RX. And the number of dealers they have is also considerably less than Acura? Correct me if I'm wrong.

But the vehicles they do have are done right IMO. That's why they keep coming up when discussing why Acura should go FR/RWD. No to mention the fact that they nearly went belly up until they were re-invented with...yup RWD.
Old 07-21-2009, 02:41 PM
  #1843  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by biker
My point was that Audi has no RWD mainline platforms and the few V8 models do very little for their overall sales. And the trend is AWAY from V8s. This has been beaten to death - neither a V8 nor a RWD platform will do magic on Acura's sales numbers. It's just this automotive downturn and the new Honda head that are making it more obvious.

Just as RWD and V8 do nothing for Infiniti.
We've already agreed that neither a V8 or RWD will guarantee success. The issue isn't having a V8 or RWD will or won't guarantee success, the issue is LACKING a V8 or RWD will guarantee failure.

And a RWD and V8 has done a lot more for Infiniti than lack of RWD and V8 has done for Acura. When the economy was humming along, Infiniti had no problem selling M35/45's, even outselling Lexus's GS many times. What has the RL outsold? Uh, maybe a Saab here or there?

You can argue that Infiniti isn't a tier-1 brand or is equal to Acura if you want. But that still doesn't doesn't disprove that lack of a V8 or RWD guarantees failure.

Again, show me a tier-1 brand that lacks both a V8 and RWD and I'll eat my words. Every tier-1 brand that I know of that has succeeded has done so with at LEAST a V8. yet Acura thinks it can be a tier-1 brand without bringing the right stuff to the table? Haha, power of dreams...but not reality.

Last edited by mrdeeno; 07-21-2009 at 02:45 PM.
Old 07-21-2009, 02:43 PM
  #1844  
Racer
 
Steelers Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: T.O.
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
uh-ooh


Four-door coupe on the way from Acura?

Return of the CL, albeit now with four doors

By Staff, Canadian Auto PressMay 27, 2009
StoryPhotos ( 1 )


Return of a Legend? The last Acura coupe to grace our roads was the CL, a sporty little two-door that had about as much visual appeal as the Accord it was based on. No wonder it didn’t make as much of an impact as the Legend Coupe that preceded it.


Acura has learned a thing or two about standing out from the crowd since these early, conservative days. Whether you like its new “shield” inspired design language or not, Acura now wears an easily recognizable face that pushes the styling envelope to extreme edges while dividing the masses into two love it or lump it piles. Therefore the brand is ripe for a new take on the two-door, and one that will reportedly share underpinnings with the recently introduced ZDX crossover.


And like the ZDX, Honda’s premium brand will be following a European forerunner into a new market niche, not branding a trail of its own. There’s nothing particularly wrong with that, and in respect of the latter four-door coupe segment, a safer bet than the ZDX, which might get bashed about on the big uncharted waves of the five-door with hatch crossover sports car niche; only BMW’s X6 surfs these waters so far.


Most likely renamed the CL, the new model will slot in between the TSX and TL, but will likely be priced nearer to the larger Acura as it will go up against Volkswagen’s stylish and fully-featured CC.


Expect Acura’s Super-Handling All-Wheel Drive (SH-AWD) and the brand’s new 3.7-litre V6, plus Motion Adaptive EPS.


If this is more than an artist’s rendering and associated blog banter we should see the resurrected CL later this year in Los Angeles or at the Detroit auto show in early January.
source: http://www.vancouversun.com/cars/Fou...340/story.html
Old 07-21-2009, 02:44 PM
  #1845  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Belzebutt
What bothers me most about Acura's insistance on FWD is not that the front wheels are driven... it's that the front overhangs are just HUGE. All the cars are starting to look like rhinos.

The main reason I decided to go for an A4 is that here's a car that doesn't have that problem, it doesn't have the huge nose.
Audi's may be fwd based, but when they mount the engine longitudinally instead of transversely, they can squeeze the engine back away from the front slightly as well as improve weight distribution...not to the point of equally a RWD car, but much better than Acura's insistence on transversely mounted engines.
Old 07-21-2009, 03:27 PM
  #1846  
Burning Brakes
 
JeffS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 761
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I'd just like to see something, anything from Acura that doesn't involve the J,Accord and dated transmission's.
Well they do have the Civic based CSX in Canada!

Dom, I completely agree with you. I would like to see Acura have a platform, engine and tranny that isn't avail in a Honda product (2.3 turbo doesn't count) in some related form.
Old 07-21-2009, 03:35 PM
  #1847  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
“It would be meaningless to emulate what other companies have been doing for more than five decades.”
Honda needs to pioneer new territory, Ito said.
And like the ZDX, Honda’s premium brand will be following a European forerunner into a new market niche, not branding a trail of its own.
Hmmmm....I see some inconsistencies here. They want to pioneer new territory yet they're playing follow the leader on their new offerings.
Old 07-21-2009, 03:39 PM
  #1848  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Steelers Wheels
uh-ooh


Four-door coupe on the way from Acura?

Return of the CL, albeit now with four doors

By Staff, Canadian Auto PressMay 27, 2009
StoryPhotos ( 1 )


Return of a Legend? The last Acura coupe to grace our roads was the CL, a sporty little two-door that had about as much visual appeal as the Accord it was based on. No wonder it didn’t make as much of an impact as the Legend Coupe that preceded it.


Acura has learned a thing or two about standing out from the crowd since these early, conservative days. Whether you like its new “shield” inspired design language or not, Acura now wears an easily recognizable face that pushes the styling envelope to extreme edges while dividing the masses into two love it or lump it piles. Therefore the brand is ripe for a new take on the two-door, and one that will reportedly share underpinnings with the recently introduced ZDX crossover.


And like the ZDX, Honda’s premium brand will be following a European forerunner into a new market niche, not branding a trail of its own. There’s nothing particularly wrong with that, and in respect of the latter four-door coupe segment, a safer bet than the ZDX, which might get bashed about on the big uncharted waves of the five-door with hatch crossover sports car niche; only BMW’s X6 surfs these waters so far.


Most likely renamed the CL, the new model will slot in between the TSX and TL, but will likely be priced nearer to the larger Acura as it will go up against Volkswagen’s stylish and fully-featured CC.


Expect Acura’s Super-Handling All-Wheel Drive (SH-AWD) and the brand’s new 3.7-litre V6, plus Motion Adaptive EPS.


If this is more than an artist’s rendering and associated blog banter we should see the resurrected CL later this year in Los Angeles or at the Detroit auto show in early January.
source: http://www.vancouversun.com/cars/Fou...340/story.html
I would honestly be shocked if this were true, which I don't think it is. We haven't heard or seen anything as far as a new model between the TSX and TL. There isn't much room there price-wise anyway.
Old 07-21-2009, 05:23 PM
  #1849  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
^^ Does seem out of left field. Could they be that close to a coupe without anyone getting wind of it? And why a new model to introduce a coupe? Why not do it to an existing product like the TSX/Euro Accord? File this under "BS" until we hear an official or more reliable source.
Old 07-21-2009, 06:24 PM
  #1850  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,665
Received 191 Likes on 118 Posts
^ cause it's cheaper? Honestly if you look at the ZDX and flattened it, voila, there's your new CL 4-door coupe.
Old 07-21-2009, 08:37 PM
  #1851  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
What you just said makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. How does bringing up a tier-1 brand with V8 engines (available in middle-entry offerings, non-RS/S models such as the A5/6, A8, Q7, etc.) disprove my statement that not having a V8 or RWD is a guarantee for failure? You might as well have just responded with "BMW is doing fine the last time I checked" because it has about as much to do in response to my statement as your audi statement does.

You want to prove my statement wrong, then name me a tier-1 brand without a V8 or RWD.
V8/RWD has no role play in Audi rise. Most of cars are TFSI/TDI 4 & 6cylinders. and consistently offering Turbo/Quattro/Wagon across the line up not one off affair.
It is the Global brand prestige that lifted it sells in China/EU/India/Middleast in premium markets.




Honda mistake was they never made Acura as global brand when times were good like late 80s/early 90s and Honda has lead in certain technologies. now it is falling behind in most of tech/design/efficient capacity/engines/transmission. And it certainly lacks the money and time to recover.
I wonder how long Acura is going to survive as separate dealearship/brand. The sooner it exit the better and MDX will not be successful for too long. The only higher priced vehicle moving. The others are too entry level in pricing.
Old 07-21-2009, 09:24 PM
  #1852  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
V8/RWD has no role play in Audi rise. Most of cars are TFSI/TDI 4 & 6cylinders. and consistently offering Turbo/Quattro/Wagon across the line up not one off affair.
It is the Global brand prestige that lifted it sells in China/EU/India/Middleast in premium markets.


Honda mistake was they never made Acura as global brand when times were good like late 80s/early 90s and Honda has lead in certain technologies. now it is falling behind in most of tech/design/efficient capacity/engines/transmission. And it certainly lacks the money and time to recover.
I wonder how long Acura is going to survive as separate dealearship/brand. The sooner it exit the better and MDX will not be successful for too long. The only higher priced vehicle moving. The others are too entry level in pricing.
Most of the cars sold may be 4cyl, but AT LEAST they offer V8 engines. That's the point, OFFERING a V8.

How do you think a tier-1 brand image is started? It's by offering LUXURY amenities that one does not need, but wants. You said it yourself, "tech/design/efficient capacity/engines/transmission". Yes, this is ALL required to develop brand image to rise to tier-1 brand image. BUt when your "engine" is lacking, you ain't going to rise to tier-1. You talk about global image, but you're not going to be able to get a global image unless you actually achieve an image in at least one of your main markets which Acura has failed to do.

It's like a freakin advanced physics class...a prereq to get into the class is at least an A in physics 101, which everyone in the class had. Acura has a B in physics 101, but A's in every other class. Getting into the class is no guarantee of success, but Acura doesn't even have what it takes to get into the class. Until they offer AT LEAST the common things that all other tier-1 automakers offer, all the things you mentioned above which INCLUDE a V8 engine, they won't ever have a chance to be considered a tier-1 brand.

Last edited by mrdeeno; 07-21-2009 at 09:26 PM.
Old 07-21-2009, 09:53 PM
  #1853  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,019
Received 4,616 Likes on 2,195 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Instead, expect me and alot of other enthusiasts - primarily those people who like to drive - to adopt V8 engines and RWD non-hybrids from other companies like Infiniti, Lexus, BMW, etc. Honda has officially lost me as a future consumer...


As I stated in the RL forum yesterday, I have officially lost all hope that the 3G RL will have V8/RWD. I hope they at least give us a DI or turbo/biturbo V6 hi-po model.

I understand that projects like this take a back seat during times in which survival is essential, though. Honda/Acura certainly knows what they are doing as even though they lost money like all other automakers (other than Subaru), they are not bankrupt and not in danger of it.

Even so, what do enthusiasts have to look forward to at Acura? I see nothing on the horizon.

I am hoping my CTS-V lasts long enough for Acura to change its mind about some of these cancellations.
Old 07-21-2009, 09:57 PM
  #1854  
Burning Brakes
 
brizey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DFW
Age: 54
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tsxgoogs
The direction they are going in is horrible. I first noticed this when they took away the rsx and replaced it with the rdx, I still see more rsx then rdx. The new zdx really annoyed me, what is the difference in the market between the rdx? Why do crossover enthusiast get so many options? IMO Crossovers are the most god awful things ever created, they ALL remind me of the pontiac aztec. I cannot see the logic behind a person buying one it does not make sense. They do not go off road and the dont have as much room as an suv. What is wrong with station wagons they look better, get better gass milage and have just as much space.


This no v8 or rwd may not be as bad a you all think. Most Porsche do not have v8s and some of their cars have awd. Maybe honda is looking to make something to compete with porsche and the gtr v6 awd. (In my dreams)
Wagons don't have as much space. The height matters. The interior of a crossover is taller, allowing for a more upright seating position, so effectively it adds legroom in a compact footprint. Plus kids in carseats are way, way easier in the taller crossover. Trust me--I moved from a WRX wagon to an RDX and it is night and day. The back seats are about three or four inches farther from the floor in the RDX as compared to my old WRX--which translates into more space for your legs and a much easier job of putting the kid in the car. Does the RDX handle as well as my WRX? Almost, but my kids ride in the car every single day. Would I have one if I was single with no kids--nope. People buy crossovers because they offer a nice blend of car like handling with some of the kid friendly conveniences of an SUV. Those people are a huge demographic--basically most people from about 25 to 50 years old.

Last edited by brizey; 07-21-2009 at 10:01 PM.
Old 07-22-2009, 12:01 AM
  #1855  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Audi's may be fwd based, but when they mount the engine longitudinally instead of transversely, they can squeeze the engine back away from the front slightly as well as improve weight distribution...not to the point of equally a RWD car, but much better than Acura's insistence on transversely mounted engines.
I think they move the front axle further in front rather than moving the engine back. Their engines are also designed to be as light and as short as possible to improve weight distribution. Their cars also use light weight materials in the front to further improve the F/R weight dist.
Old 07-22-2009, 01:13 AM
  #1856  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,198
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Well, first no NSX-replacement. Now, no V8, no RWD.

What's next on the chopping board ? ... no DSI ? ... no dual-clutch auto ? ... no DOHC V6 ? ... no everything ?

How the f??k is the Acura brand gonna get to Tier-1 ? Looks like my l..o..n..g wait for a better Acura replacement to my TL-S is finally over with Acura.
Old 07-22-2009, 01:29 AM
  #1857  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,198
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Most of the cars sold may be 4cyl, but AT LEAST they offer V8 engines. That's the point, OFFERING a V8.

How do you think a tier-1 brand image is started? It's by offering LUXURY amenities that one does not need, but wants. You said it yourself, "tech/design/efficient capacity/engines/transmission". Yes, this is ALL required to develop brand image to rise to tier-1 brand image. BUt when your "engine" is lacking, you ain't going to rise to tier-1. You talk about global image, but you're not going to be able to get a global image unless you actually achieve an image in at least one of your main markets which Acura has failed to do.

It's like a freakin advanced physics class...a prereq to get into the class is at least an A in physics 101, which everyone in the class had. Acura has a B in physics 101, but A's in every other class. Getting into the class is no guarantee of success, but Acura doesn't even have what it takes to get into the class. Until they offer AT LEAST the common things that all other tier-1 automakers offer, all the things you mentioned above which INCLUDE a V8 engine, they won't ever have a chance to be considered a tier-1 brand.
Absolutely correct. Audi generously offers V8 engine options in most of it's vehicle lines, even though the bulk of it's sales is V6 equipped.

Similarly, the R- and RS- lines are not volume sellers. The sole purpose of the existence of these "supercar" lines and the V8 engine option is to build image : model image and brand image. Without them, the Audi brand is just as lame as the VW brand, exactly like the current Acura and Honda brands relationship. These are the ingredients to elevate the Audi brand to the current Tier-1 status.
Old 07-22-2009, 05:51 AM
  #1858  
10th Gear
 
Faithless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in canada

09 g37s coupe - 37k after taxes

09 pontiac g8 gt - 28k after taxes

my 08 tl - 39k after taxes (granted im paying 475 lease for the next 2 years)

I'm trying to get rid of my tl ASAP so i can buy a pontiac g8. Other than the hideous pontiac logo, I love the feel..
Old 07-22-2009, 05:52 AM
  #1859  
10th Gear
 
Faithless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Absolutely correct. Audi generously offers V8 engine options in most of it's vehicle lines, even though the bulk of it's sales is V6 equipped.

Similarly, the R- and RS- lines are not volume sellers. The sole purpose of the existence of these "supercar" lines and the V8 engine option is to build image : model image and brand image. Without them, the Audi brand is just as lame as the VW brand, exactly like the current Acura and Honda brands relationship. These are the ingredients to elevate the Audi brand to the current Tier-1 status.
just like how honda has commericials touting its f1/indy line?

I hate those commercials. It pisses me off to own a honda.
Old 07-22-2009, 07:05 AM
  #1860  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by neuronbob

I understand that projects like this take a back seat during times in which survival is essential, though. Honda/Acura certainly knows what they are doing as even though they lost money like all other automakers (other than Subaru), they are not bankrupt and not in danger of it.
Yeah, but at Honda, projects like this also take a back seat during good times. How many years of "good times" did they have, breaking records left and right, that they could have AT LEAST updated the NSX? by my count, they had over a decade and they still couldn't pull it off. maybe they're engineering the next gen ASIMO as a transformer that can turn into an NSX...they had the freakin time and money for it.
Old 07-22-2009, 07:41 AM
  #1861  
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yonkers NY
Age: 43
Posts: 11,016
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Say what you will about Infiniti not doing as good as Acura, or the G8 being a Pontiac. But, the bottom line is that the G8 and pretty much any car Infiniti has, are way more fun to drive than anything Acura has to offer. I dont care who's selling as much as i care about the driving experience.
Old 07-22-2009, 07:57 AM
  #1862  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Faithless
in canada

09 g37s coupe - 37k after taxes

09 pontiac g8 gt - 28k after taxes

my 08 tl - 39k after taxes (granted im paying 475 lease for the next 2 years)
Where are you getting those prices from? Are those dealer quotes after negotiation? Because that's not even close to MSRP.

I find it hard to believe that a car that starts at $45,200 (G37 coupe) can be had for 37K after taxes.
Old 07-22-2009, 08:53 AM
  #1863  
Changin bulbs since '73
iTrader: (1)
 
Loseit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chi-town burbs
Age: 51
Posts: 8,111
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
Again, if you notice everyone uses and the words Acura/Honda interchangeibly(?). That is the problem. There is no difference. A luxury car buyer always looks for a little more exclusivity conciously or unconciously. You feel stupid for buying a tarted up lesser version of the same car. Lexus and Toyota hardly get mashed together like that. Infiniti is getting better at it. No one EVER talks about the fact that a Passat and A4 are the same underneath.
The ZDX will fail...to small of a niche and ugly
4 door coupe...we will have to see.
Why couldn't they offer the TSX w/ V6 AND AWD.....that would be awesome. That car still looks okay compared next to it's stable mates. THat would be a car that would be a great entry level luxuy car that really competes.
Old 07-22-2009, 09:05 AM
  #1864  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
same old same old.
Old 07-22-2009, 09:16 AM
  #1865  
Oderint dum metuant.
 
chill_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes on 446 Posts
Originally Posted by Steelers Wheels
...
Return of the CL, albeit now with four doors
...
A coupe does not have four doors, regardless of what shape it has.
Old 07-22-2009, 03:01 PM
  #1866  
TMQ
Pro
 
TMQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North by Northwest
Age: 48
Posts: 608
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm OK with Honda's decision. It's tough times in the Auto market. They can always change their mind when there's more money.

If I want RWD there are plenty of choices. When I want a relatively cheap and reliable car, Honda also has some options. I don't care for the Acura cars now mostly because of the design, but if people can look past that, an AWD premium sedan from Acura is still not a bad choice, there're pros and cons between Acura and Audi.

What Honda and Acura doesn't have is high performance cars. I think Honda has decided to walk away from that segment.
Old 07-22-2009, 06:01 PM
  #1867  
Racer
 
CraigMacDTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Age: 47
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 MDX/ZDX 6SPD Auto Tranny Issues

Well folks, apparently it's happened already. I thought the release of the MDX was being pushed back a couple months because the US still had too many to sell. After speaking with someone today, who is a manager of an Acura dealership and a friend of an employee at the Allison Ontario plant, it's been said that there's been some problems so far with the new 6 speed automatic transmission that's going to be part of the MDX and ZDX. All I know is that they better fix this issue soon! Who the hell is going to want to buy an 09 MDX come October/November/December while all others have their 2010's in? If that's the case, we'll be seeing some MAJOR trading dollars (factory incentives) to throw at potential MDX owners to buy an 09.

- to Acura's history of developing new trannys!
Old 07-22-2009, 06:06 PM
  #1868  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Gonna need more than 2nd hand word of mouth for me to believe this.
Old 07-22-2009, 06:09 PM
  #1869  
Racer
 
CraigMacDTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Age: 47
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Gonna need more than 2nd hand word of mouth for me to believe this.
You don't think they'll publicly admit to something like this do you? It DOES make perfect sense as to why the 3 month delay of the MDX...IMO
Old 07-22-2009, 09:40 PM
  #1870  
Intermediate
 
miketala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many G37's have issues with their new 7spd transmissions. A software update about a month ago appears to have fixed the problem. Something similar could happen with Acura's 6spd.
Old 07-22-2009, 10:32 PM
  #1871  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by miketala
Many G37's have issues with their new 7spd transmissions. A software update about a month ago appears to have fixed the problem. Something similar could happen with Acura's 6spd.
Well the problem with the G37's was the manner in which it shifted, which is easily fixed by a firmware update. But otherwise it was not UNRELIABLE where it would slam you into 2nd gear while doing 65mph on the freeway like Honda's 5-spd tranny did.

Even if true, at least they're taking care of it before it goes on sale instead of insisting that they never heard of the problem even though everyone and their mother had or knew someone who had a tranny fail, only to finally issue a recall of pretty much every 5spd auto equipped honda (odyssey, TL, accord, etc. etc.).
Old 07-22-2009, 11:01 PM
  #1872  
Acura Vet
 
alphason'sac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Snellville, GA
Age: 46
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Faithless
just like how honda has commericials touting its f1/indy line?

I hate those commercials. It pisses me off to own a honda.
Most embarrasing line in a commercial...."The most powerful Acura ever built".....

It also shows how much they DON'T get it.
Old 07-23-2009, 12:25 AM
  #1873  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,379
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
Originally Posted by TMQ
I'm OK with Honda's decision. It's tough times in the Auto market. They can always change their mind when there's more money.

If I want RWD there are plenty of choices. When I want a relatively cheap and reliable car, Honda also has some options. I don't care for the Acura cars now mostly because of the design, but if people can look past that, an AWD premium sedan from Acura is still not a bad choice, there're pros and cons between Acura and Audi.
I think this sums up very well the thinking by the great majority of buyers.
Old 07-23-2009, 02:04 AM
  #1874  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Yeah, but at Honda, projects like this also take a back seat during good times. How many years of "good times" did they have, breaking records left and right, that they could have AT LEAST updated the NSX? by my count, they had over a decade and they still couldn't pull it off. maybe they're engineering the next gen ASIMO as a transformer that can turn into an NSX...they had the freakin time and money for it.
Well, to be fair, they updated the NSX to make it go from a 14s car to a 12.5s car in the 1/4 mile. They updated it so that its lap time at Nurburgring is 7:56 instead of over 8:20 so that it matches the 996 911 GT3 with 360hp or the C5 Z06 with 400hp. May be that's not enough?
Old 07-23-2009, 02:07 AM
  #1875  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,198
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Originally Posted by TMQ

.....

What Honda and Acura doesn't have is high performance cars. I think Honda has decided to walk away from that segment.
That's exactly the problem with Acura. Available high performance vehicles is one of the MUST's which enable a luxury auto brand to become a true Tier-1 luxury auto brand.
Old 07-23-2009, 02:07 AM
  #1876  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by TMQ
I'm OK with Honda's decision. It's tough times in the Auto market. They can always change their mind when there's more money.

If I want RWD there are plenty of choices. When I want a relatively cheap and reliable car, Honda also has some options. I don't care for the Acura cars now mostly because of the design, but if people can look past that, an AWD premium sedan from Acura is still not a bad choice, there're pros and cons between Acura and Audi.

What Honda and Acura doesn't have is high performance cars. I think Honda has decided to walk away from that segment.
Unfortunately they only offer high performance, fun to drive cars in Japan, namely the FD2 CTR that would run circles around the S2k Type S with ease and easily keep up with a Nismo Z with well over 300hp at Tsukuba; while leaving Lan Evo, FD RX7, NSX S Zero, and R34 GTR in the dust at Suzuka. Too bad it's not available here.
Old 07-23-2009, 03:13 AM
  #1877  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Well, to be fair, they updated the NSX to make it go from a 14s car to a 12.5s car in the 1/4 mile. They updated it so that its lap time at Nurburgring is 7:56 instead of over 8:20 so that it matches the 996 911 GT3 with 360hp or the C5 Z06 with 400hp. May be that's not enough?
Originally Posted by iforyou
Unfortunately they only offer high performance, fun to drive cars in Japan, namely the FD2 CTR that would run circles around the S2k Type S with ease and easily keep up with a Nismo Z with well over 300hp at Tsukuba; while leaving Lan Evo, FD RX7, NSX S Zero, and R34 GTR in the dust at Suzuka. Too bad it's not available here.
That's exactly the problem, most of those cars aren't available here. It doesn't matter if say, Subaru offers an STi that produces over 500bhp and outhandles the GT-R for the price of a CTR, if its available only in Japan then it won't nearly have the same recognition. And while the NSX was definitely improved over the years, they let the model itself get stagnant. In the early 90's when the NSX was first introduced, it was essentially a world beater since it outclassed the most affordable Ferrari at the time handling-wise, the 348 GTS. And back when the NSX was still in production, its logical that an NSX-R would easily be worth six figures or more in the US, considering the standard NSX was right around $90k. At that range, consumers who make that much would probably hard pressed to take an "Acura" over a brand with more prestige like Porsche, especially when on paper, price in consideration also even 911 Carrera S's were cheaper. People with that kind of income don't ultimately consider price/performance ratio quite as much as they do luxury and status.

Later on in the NSX's life there were many more new, more affordable cars (like a 911) that offered similar or better performance for less, or with more prestige. The value prospect of the NSX that made Ferrari dramatically step up its game in the 90's was all but gone. Though the NSX design is timeless, 98% of all people probably think it hadn't changed or changed very little over its lifespan, MMC aside. Hell, here we are on an car enthusiast forum and the guy you quoted said it changed relatively little throughout its life. Though the NSX had a number of significant changes over the year, it just wasn't enough.

And even still.... though the only Type-R I've driven is an ITR, many of them are not suitable daily drivers. It was drivable alright, but no radio? No A/C? No thanks. For anything besides a track-dedicated race car, I doubt the CTR would have a ride compliant enough and enough amenities and at the right price. The Mugen Si itself was already $30,000, a price which made many enthusiasts laugh and think, Even though it does outperform a Nismo 350Z, most people shopping around in the $30,000 range even (imagine how sensitive the brand whores are when shopping for a $100k car) will think, why the hell would I buy a Civic over X car?
Old 07-23-2009, 06:41 AM
  #1878  
10th Gear
 
Faithless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Where are you getting those prices from? Are those dealer quotes after negotiation? Because that's not even close to MSRP.

I find it hard to believe that a car that starts at $45,200 (G37 coupe) can be had for 37K after taxes.
my friend just purchased one last month for stated price. I know he paid in cash though.
Old 07-23-2009, 08:03 AM
  #1879  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
^^ It could easily be true. The floodgates are opening now as this recession continues. Dealers are starting to run out of emergency cash to ride this out. Manufacturers are starting to step up and giving dealers cash incentives on sales. They are passing it to customers. I suspect it will grow as the fall approaches.

You can get a $40k TL for about $33k. Want an 09 MB E350? MB is offering a $10k dealer incentive until 7/31 !!!!! I'm not a big MB fan, but I'm probably going to go down to my MB dealer and look at them. Maybe trade in my 07 RL if I can get it for Invoice minus $10k
Old 07-23-2009, 06:42 PM
  #1880  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,198
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey

.....

You can get a $40k TL for about $33k. Want an 09 MB E350? MB is offering a $10k dealer incentive until 7/31 !!!!! I'm not a big MB fan, but I'm probably going to go down to my MB dealer and look at them. Maybe trade in my 07 RL if I can get it for Invoice minus $10k
Agree. The E350 is a damn good car. Even better is the 2010 model, after seeing that the 2010 and future RL is going nowhere now.


Quick Reply: Acura: Development and Technology News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.