Is everyone ready for the Type S Concept? (Reveal Pics Page 5)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2019, 05:43 PM
  #561  
There are four lights!
 
ZipSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 509
Received 215 Likes on 124 Posts
All this power, and the majority of us can't even use all of it during day-to-day driving! That Corolla and M340i is going to move at the same speeds when you're stuck in gridlock traffic for hours. Hell, the city I live in doesn't even have a track, drag strip, or anything of that kind where I can have fun safely. Once upon a time, my first turbo'd vehicle was a 2006 Forester XT and I thought that thing was fast with "only" 230hp/235lb-ft. Sure, it might be a dick measurement contest for some, but if the Type-S comes back between 350 to 400 hp, I'd be reasonably happy. For those that want more, good thing there's lots of other choices.
Old 12-05-2019, 06:20 PM
  #562  
6 Forward 1 Back
 
Speed_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 2,400
Received 312 Likes on 155 Posts
Originally Posted by someguy11
This is what I've been trying to tell these dreamers. I briefly went on a hunt for other 400hp sedans and found this C&D article from 2017. Some aren't sedans. Those that are in 2017 pricing (so add inflation):
XTS V - $65k
M3/M4 - $65k
Q70 - $64k
K900 (I didn't know they still made these) - $62k
CTS V - $61k
ATS V - $61k
Continental (no one is driving this for speed/performance) - $60k
G80 (wow, sharp looking car) - $55k
Q56/Q60 Red Sport - $49k
SS (no longer made, really too bad) - $48k
MKZ (not a sports car) - $43k
Charger Hellcat - currently $70k

Power and performance are proportional to price. If Acura can't sell a luxurious, loaded 377hp RLX SH-AWD sport hybrid that does 0-60 in 4.9sec for $62k, what makes anyone think they will sell a less luxurious, slightly faster, smaller TLX Type S for slightly less?
It won't be "slightly" less. It's looking like $10,000 less with all the features of a modern tech and a decent engine. People won't buy a RLX in that price range because you're smack dab in the middle of the other premium brands. I don't think they'll have a problem selling the Type S especially compared to the RLX which doesn't sell because you can get a TLX that's 95% the same for $15k-$20k less. I could care less about the constant comparison to the germans, because it's obvious they're not trying to compete there. They've always been hamstrung by Honda. Their niche still appears to be this middle area between premium and entry were people want value and reliability with a little modern tech. Some of you will say their reliability has nose dived, but I haven't had any issues with my TLX for the 2 1/2 years i've had it. Do I wish the new Type S will be a canyon carver 400hp monster, yes, but I know it won't be. It will still have a lot of bang for your buck.
The following 2 users liked this post by Speed_Racer:
internalaudit (12-06-2019), sweeT n Lo (12-26-2019)
Old 12-05-2019, 08:08 PM
  #563  
Racer
 
MIKEYDRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 43
Posts: 294
Received 58 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Terdbath
3 liter single turbo from Honda = 350 crank HP max. I hope I'm wrong but agree with comments above that Honda usually plays it safe.
That is very conservative for a modern day turbo that is less than 120 hp/L. Like I said before and others have said as well, why bother with a Type S with those numbers. The goal post have moved drastically since 2008 when Acura last tried to play in this game. Back the natural aspirated V6 were making 320 Mazda so a Type S at 286 or so didnt seem to far off, but with the performance gains with turbos they need to aim much higher.
Old 12-05-2019, 10:53 PM
  #564  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by fiatlux
Actually, the numbers you presented are consistent with the reported HP numbers. Trap speed is more correlated to HP and weight than the quarter time, which is dependent on traction, launch, shifts, etc. 112mph for 400bhp, 111 mph for 365bhp, 109mph for 320bhp sounds about right. The M340 is definitely grossly underrated which is why the 114mph trap speed isn't that surprising.
Weight is also a factor. At 374WHP on DynoJet I am listed in drag times back in 2011 with a 12.563 @ 114.529 & 1/8 8.062 @ 90.430 but with a poor 2.070 60ft time. Has a lot of traction issues with that car & as I added more power went to a 2nd gear start with the 7DCT. Eventually the car moved up to 12.005 @ 116.89 dynoed around 410WHP.
Old 12-15-2019, 05:20 PM
  #565  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Whats the expected engine for type S?
3.0 turbo? I would be surprised if they will
match infinity red 400hp, I am guessing something in low 300hp?
Old 12-15-2019, 06:00 PM
  #566  
Pro
 
dmski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 681
Received 542 Likes on 265 Posts
You're expecting something in the low 300hp for a Type S with a brand new TT engine. Come on. That would be an epic fail. The previous 3.7L made 310hp. This thing better push 400hp at least.
The following users liked this post:
Speed_Racer (12-17-2019)
Old 12-15-2019, 06:24 PM
  #567  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Originally Posted by dmski
You're expecting something in the low 300hp for a Type S with a brand new TT engine. Come on. That would be an epic fail. The previous 3.7L made 310hp. This thing better push 400hp at least.
lets hope so, Acura is typically conservative with HP in their engines, they are not likely to do something crazy with HP, but we shall see
The following users liked this post:
Midnight Mystery (12-15-2019)
Old 12-15-2019, 06:28 PM
  #568  
Instructor
 
CollinR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 115
Received 82 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by russianDude
lets hope so, Acura is typically conservative with HP in their engines, they are not likely to do something crazy with HP, but we shall see
Keep in mind the 2.0T in the RDX is 272/280 hp/tq. That should be the context for how we estimate the specs of the new engine.
Old 12-15-2019, 06:33 PM
  #569  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Originally Posted by CollinR4
Keep in mind the 2.0T in the RDX is 272/280 hp/tq. That should be the context for how we estimate the specs of the new engine.
yes, but if its 3.0T, the HP could be 340hp. Unless
its confirmed to be 3.5T?
Old 12-15-2019, 09:51 PM
  #570  
There are four lights!
 
ZipSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 509
Received 215 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by russianDude
yes, but if its 3.0T, the HP could be 340hp. Unless
its confirmed to be 3.5T?
The S55 engine on the BMW M3 makes “only” north of 400hp from a 3.0TT. Acura is done with the 3.5 J series engines so don’t expect to see a turbo’d version of that engine.

Rumor has it that a mild hybrid will also be part of the 3.0TT so seeing something close to 400hp isn’t that far fetched.
The following users liked this post:
Midnight Mystery (12-16-2019)
Old 12-16-2019, 12:45 AM
  #571  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by ZipSpeed
The S55 engine on the BMW M3 makes “only” north of 400hp from a 3.0TT. Acura is done with the 3.5 J series engines so don’t expect to see a turbo’d version of that engine.

Rumor has it that a mild hybrid will also be part of the 3.0TT so seeing something close to 400hp isn’t that far fetched.
Current top S55 3.0 liter M is now at 444BHP advertised, The 2021 G generation M 3/4 series with a new 3.0L S58 inline-six using larger bore & shorter stroke for higher revs with up to 503 horsepower. They are opening some space between the 382BHP M340/M440 & the true M series. With this much spread I expect them to add a MPPSK option pack similar to what I have in the 440 to move the M340/M440 to a bit over 400BHP. Current system raises the base 320BHP to 355BHP.
The M340 is already a sub 4 second low 12 second car.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 12-16-2019 at 12:59 AM.
Old 12-16-2019, 05:55 AM
  #572  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
I really doubt that Acura will put engine with M3 like numbers, that’s just wishful thinking.
Old 12-16-2019, 08:45 AM
  #573  
There are four lights!
 
ZipSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 509
Received 215 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by russianDude
I really doubt that Acura will put engine with M3 like numbers, that’s just wishful thinking.
It won’t have M3 like numbers when the M340i is already in the 400ish range which the Type-S will compete with. As Bear mentioned, the new M3 coming out will be in excess of 500hp. If Acura ever decides to go bonkers with a M3 competitor, that would be the Type-R.
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (12-16-2019)
Old 12-16-2019, 08:58 AM
  #574  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
damn, it's been like 10 years already....
Old 12-16-2019, 08:58 AM
  #575  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Originally Posted by ZipSpeed
It won’t have M3 like numbers when the M340i is already in the 400ish range which the Type-S will compete with. As Bear mentioned, the new M3 coming out will be in excess of 500hp. If Acura ever decides to go bonkers with a M3 competitor, that would be the Type-R.
acura will not be competing with M3, its a different league. If they make them too expensive, no one will buy them, it has to be reasonably priced to sell
Old 12-16-2019, 11:27 AM
  #576  
There are four lights!
 
ZipSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 509
Received 215 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by russianDude
acura will not be competing with M3, its a different league. If they make them too expensive, no one will buy them, it has to be reasonably priced to sell
I never implied they will be making a M3 competitor. Just saying IF they did, it would be a Type-R.
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (12-16-2019)
Old 12-16-2019, 03:43 PM
  #577  
Suzuka Master
 
Joneill44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston
Age: 33
Posts: 8,000
Received 3,595 Likes on 1,721 Posts
So.... who will be the first to engine swap this into a 3G
The following users liked this post:
csmeance (12-30-2019)
Old 12-23-2019, 08:12 AM
  #578  
Instructor
 
CollinR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 115
Received 82 Likes on 33 Posts
Interesting to read about the significant upgrade to the Genesis G70 during the likely refresh with their new Theta and Lambda III engines. Entry-level engine for the G70 being upgraded from 2.0T 252/260 to 2.5T 290/310 with an 8-speed wet dual-clutch transmission. Going to make that quite the value proposition. Less information on the bigger 3.5TT engine but I would expect a decent bump over the 365/376 of the 3.3TT in the current G70. Competition like this will only give buyers improved options.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a3...70-new-engine/

Here's to hoping the new TLX is ready to compete.
The following 3 users liked this post by CollinR4:
internalaudit (12-29-2019), Jiten Patel (12-23-2019), pyrodan007 (12-29-2019)
Old 12-23-2019, 08:59 AM
  #579  
Instructor
 
Jiten Patel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 116
Received 89 Likes on 50 Posts
I think that we will be seeing a 2.0T from the RDX and Type R on the new TLX on all the models except for the Type S. It will be refined from the previous 3 years of it's service. Most likely mated to a Dual Clutch and with this config it will most likely pull 300HP. I think the 3.0TT will be seen only on the Type S probably with an Automatic and Manual config?

Last edited by Jiten Patel; 12-23-2019 at 09:02 AM. Reason: Forgot to add extra info.
The following users liked this post:
internalaudit (12-29-2019)
Old 12-23-2019, 11:39 AM
  #580  
BGR
Instructor
 
BGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Age: 41
Posts: 178
Received 248 Likes on 95 Posts
https://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?...tem_id=1404694

"We are expecting to see production 2021 TLXs hitting showrooms by the late Spring/early Summer time frame, with the hot Type S version to follow probably later in the Fall."
The following 5 users liked this post by BGR:
a35tl (12-23-2019), CollinR4 (12-23-2019), internalaudit (12-29-2019), Jiten Patel (12-23-2019), ZipSpeed (12-23-2019)
Old 12-24-2019, 02:45 PM
  #581  
Instructor
 
Mak P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 34
Posts: 163
Received 58 Likes on 40 Posts
Acura has been working on this car how long? Why aren't all variations coming out the same time
Old 12-24-2019, 03:35 PM
  #582  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
Because Honda hates us
Old 12-24-2019, 04:56 PM
  #583  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
They are building anticipation, will be selling them at MSRP initially, but a year later will be usual 10% under.
Old 12-27-2019, 12:45 PM
  #584  
Pro
 
TVL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 591
Received 91 Likes on 53 Posts
My dealership told me today the Type S is being released in spring 2020 DEFINITELY.
The following users liked this post:
internalaudit (12-29-2019)
Old 12-27-2019, 12:53 PM
  #585  
Safety Car
iTrader: (5)
 
sockr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Diego
Age: 41
Posts: 4,430
Received 1,159 Likes on 909 Posts
Originally Posted by TVL65
My dealership told me today the Type S is being released in spring 2020 DEFINITELY.
"giggles"
they probably meant the regular tlx not the type s as that is what was reported recently
Old 12-27-2019, 04:04 PM
  #586  
BGR
Instructor
 
BGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Age: 41
Posts: 178
Received 248 Likes on 95 Posts
Originally Posted by TVL65
My dealership told me today the Type S is being released in spring 2020 DEFINITELY.
The regular TLX will be. Production starts next month so it should be at Chicago auto show for sure.
Old 12-27-2019, 08:37 PM
  #587  
tehLEGOman
 
ACCURATEin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 9,135
Received 1,982 Likes on 1,335 Posts
Will it run faster around the ring than the type R?

I think that's how they should debut the type S. In car video of it going around the track[nurburgring], driver flicks the dial selector hard right to track mode, maybe a minute or so of it rolling around, then the sleeve flings off of the car and POP. [audience and internet stare at the production ready version in amaze because it somehow ended up looking even better than the blue concept]
The following 2 users liked this post by ACCURATEin:
BGR (12-28-2019), nismotypeS (12-28-2019)
Old 12-28-2019, 09:02 AM
  #588  
Pro
 
TVL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 591
Received 91 Likes on 53 Posts
For some reason I think Acura will give it no more than 350 Hp tops. probably 330.
Old 12-28-2019, 09:38 AM
  #589  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Originally Posted by TVL65
For some reason I think Acura will give it no more than 350 Hp tops. probably 330.
I am also thinking that. New Toyota supra is 330 with 3.0T v6. Regular TLX will probably be 2.0T with 270hp, and Type S 3.0T with 50-60 more HP.
that is decent too.
Old 12-28-2019, 12:35 PM
  #590  
Pro
 
Kinuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: CT
Age: 33
Posts: 569
Received 102 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by russianDude
I am also thinking that. New Toyota supra is 330 with 3.0T v6. Regular TLX will probably be 2.0T with 270hp, and Type S 3.0T with 50-60 more HP.
that is decent too.
270hp would be a huge downgrade! I don't think that would even sell if the TL and TLX of previous gen surpassed 270HP.
Old 12-28-2019, 12:43 PM
  #591  
Pro
 
TVL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 591
Received 91 Likes on 53 Posts
I'm going with 330 Hp. And I won't be buying one if thats all it'll have.
Old 12-28-2019, 01:06 PM
  #592  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Originally Posted by Kinuto
270hp would be a huge downgrade! I don't think that would even sell if the TL and TLX of previous gen surpassed 270HP.
If all TLX (other than Type S) switch to 2.0T RDX/Accord engine, 270 HP would be the HP. Maybe they can tune it to 280HP
Old 12-28-2019, 01:22 PM
  #593  
Burning Brakes
 
jhb31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 809
Received 385 Likes on 225 Posts
Originally Posted by TVL65
For some reason I think Acura will give it no more than 350 Hp tops. probably 330.
350 is about the top that I would expect as well. If I was to bet I would take the under. They are going to have a type S variant for all models going forward and I don't expect the TLX/RDX to push close to 400Hp. Going up over 350 will not pull that many Acura buyers in and may reduce demand if the price gets too far above the next model below it. When you get into BMW/Audi pricing you get into that range where the badge matters to a lot of people. Acura's best selling TL/TLX was where they balanced price/styling/performance/low maintenance costs and included a lot of options standard that cost extra on other brands. I still don't get how a mid level civic has things like remote start standard and in the TLX it's an extra cost even on models that top 40K. Seems for some reason a lot of desirable features flow from the bottom models up at honda/acura rather than from the top down. Like AA/Carplay in the civic 2 years before the TLX.
The following users liked this post:
internalaudit (12-29-2019)
Old 12-28-2019, 01:28 PM
  #594  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Look at toyota supra 2020, $50k car selling like hot cakes and 3.0T only pushes out 335hp. You would think for that money they could have pushed it to 400??
Old 12-28-2019, 02:02 PM
  #595  
Safety Car
 
fiatlux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Age: 36
Posts: 4,871
Received 3,429 Likes on 1,879 Posts
Originally Posted by russianDude
Look at toyota supra 2020, $50k car selling like hot cakes and 3.0T only pushes out 335hp. You would think for that money they could have pushed it to 400??
It's advertised as 335, but everyone who buys it (i.e. enthusiasts) knows that it's really pushing out closer to 400hp. C&D put one on the dyno and found that it makes 339hp AT THE WHEELS. It's very likely that they had to underrate it because BMW is underrating the same engine in its M40i models so that it doesn't encroach on the BMW M2, which is advertised at 405hp, or the M4 at 425hp.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a2...no-horsepower/

On that note, as soon as the new M3/4 comes out with 500+ hp, expect the M40i (the Type-S competitor) to stop being sandbagged and have at least 400hp. If the TLX Type-S makes 335hp, it'll sell about as well as the TLX PMC does.

Last edited by fiatlux; 12-28-2019 at 02:05 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by fiatlux:
BEAR-AvHistory (01-01-2020), internalaudit (12-29-2019), justnspace (12-28-2019)
Old 12-28-2019, 03:19 PM
  #596  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
Originally Posted by russianDude
Look at toyota supra 2020, $50k car selling like hot cakes and 3.0T only pushes out 335hp. You would think for that money they could have pushed it to 400??
it is pushing 400hp to the wheels
The following users liked this post:
internalaudit (12-29-2019)
Old 12-28-2019, 03:28 PM
  #597  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,364
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
it is pushing 400hp to the wheels
ok... I am just going by stated numbers
Old 12-30-2019, 09:31 AM
  #598  
Advanced
 
mojo_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 94
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by fiatlux
It's advertised as 335, but everyone who buys it (i.e. enthusiasts) knows that it's really pushing out closer to 400hp. C&D put one on the dyno and found that it makes 339hp AT THE WHEELS. It's very likely that they had to underrate it because BMW is underrating the same engine in its M40i models so that it doesn't encroach on the BMW M2, which is advertised at 405hp, or the M4 at 425hp.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a2...no-horsepower/

On that note, as soon as the new M3/4 comes out with 500+ hp, expect the M40i (the Type-S competitor) to stop being sandbagged and have at least 400hp. If the TLX Type-S makes 335hp, it'll sell about as well as the TLX PMC does.
The M340i is already pushing 400+ HP. BMW has significantly underrated this car. Car and Driver recently tested the M340i and it’s on par with the outgoing M3. They got 0-60 in 3.8s. I seriously doubt ACURA is even going to attempt to compete with the M340i.

”Ultimately, the M340i ripped off a 3.8-second zero-to-60-mph sprint and tore through the quarter-mile in 12.3 seconds at 115 mph. If you are wondering, those times are on pace with the last-generation M3.”






Last edited by mojo_79; 12-30-2019 at 09:43 AM.
Old 12-30-2019, 05:47 PM
  #599  
not superchaged
 
JackRydden224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 168
Received 40 Likes on 29 Posts
I think chasing the Germans will get Acura nowhere in terms of sales. The M340i is going above and beyond what this segment offers and Acura would be wise not to case the outlier. If the turbo 6 can push out numbers similar to Infiniti, Genesis and Kia it will be enough for most buyers. I mean when is 0-60 in 4.5 and 1/4 mile in 13.5 not enough for 95% of the buyers?

The 2.0T is going to be the volume seller. I am much more interested in a 2.0T SH-AWD for a daily. Turbo 6 is just overkill for me.

PS: I daily a 07 CLS550 and it's definitely overkill for commutes and 95% of the driving done on the weekends.

Old 12-30-2019, 07:27 PM
  #600  
Safety Car
 
fiatlux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Age: 36
Posts: 4,871
Received 3,429 Likes on 1,879 Posts

The following users liked this post:
someguy11 (12-31-2019)


Quick Reply: Is everyone ready for the Type S Concept? (Reveal Pics Page 5)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.