Turbo Kit for Acura TL '04-'08

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2012, 08:45 PM
  #5721  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
added a check valve to the brake booster and evap hoses. cheap insurance for the long run as paul mentioned.

What are the part #s of the check valves you're using?
1) crankcase vent: http://boombaracing.com/cv.html 12mm?

2) brake booster hose: http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/ite...3369&catid=489?

2) evap hose: http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/ite...3369&catid=489?

Last edited by bTwix; 09-12-2012 at 08:50 PM.
Old 09-12-2012, 09:04 PM
  #5722  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
after many hours of playing with this idle issue, i got it figured out. after speaking with gerzand about smoothing out the timing and fuel tables, i adjusted these tables many different ways and had no luck.

i kept thinking about that damn oem pcv valve and tube. i always figured the stock pcv valve was not up to task of holding 18psi from entering the crankcase. however, since i already had -10an fittings welded to the opposite side of each valve cover and connected to a separate vented catch can, i thought that was enough to prevent boost from pressuring the crankcase.

at this point i simply removed the stock pcv tube, capped off the manifold with a rubber nipple and let the front valve cover vent to atmosphere from stock pcv location (while leaving the vented catch can connected to the opposite side)

idle was back to 850rpm, was not hunting and did not stall. looks like the problem was solved. even though this looked like a solution, I believe I found a better route.

i thought about running a oil separator from the stock pcv location but knew the pcv valve wouldnt hold back the boost from entering the crank case. boombaracing makes a nice aluminum check valve that can hold 100psi but will crack open with as little as .25psi allowing the manifold to breath

with this check valve in place, it also solved my oil drain issue from the turbo. prior to the check valve, it believe the pressure getting into the crankcase was causing a flow problem. pulling the feed line from the turbo and there was literally oil filled inside the turbo. after enough time, the pressure would bleed off and the turbo would drain.

so i give you my solution to a high idle. that black tube in the hose coming from the manifold is the check valve

Here's the before picture:


So you basically use the stock location from manifold via boombaracing check valve to the catch can? Did you drill out the stock location similar to this S2000:
Old 09-13-2012, 03:42 AM
  #5723  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
What are the part #s of the check valves you're using?
1) crankcase vent: http://boombaracing.com/cv.html 12mm?

2) brake booster hose: http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/ite...3369&catid=489?

2) evap hose: http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/ite...3369&catid=489?
10mm (3/8) crankcase

3/8 checkvalve for both evap and brake booster

Originally Posted by bTwix
So you basically use the stock location from manifold via boombaracing check valve to the catch can? Did you drill out the stock location similar to this S2000:
i left the stock pcv valve in place. I would like to remove the pcv valve itself but I havent figured out how to plug the hole yet
The following users liked this post:
bTwix (09-13-2012)
Old 09-13-2012, 10:29 PM
  #5724  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
i left the stock pcv valve in place. I would like to remove the pcv valve itself but I havent figured out how to plug the hole yet
Would a block off plate similar to this do the trick?
http://www.namotorsports.net/detail....d/BHBSH20TPCV1
http://www.namotorsports.net/docs/BHBSH20TPCV1.pdf
Old 09-14-2012, 02:48 AM
  #5725  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
yes a block off plate would work but I havent found anything that will fit and make a seal.

I tried to hollow out the stock pcv valve but I wound up destroying it. At 15$ each, Ill just have to buy a few and try again.
Old 09-14-2012, 12:58 PM
  #5726  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
yes a block off plate would work but I havent found anything that will fit and make a seal.
Maybe something XLR8 or others could fab? Seems like something the turbo crowd would want.

With the boombaracing checkvalve to catch can in place for crankcase vent, what's the downside to just leaving the existing PCV valve in place vs. deleting it? Do we expect it to fail, or actuate in addition to the boobaracing check valve?

Here's a PCV delete thread on the honda tech forum:
http://honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=3026220 (esp. see posts #9-17)
Originally Posted by MalcolmV8
Cool thanks for the info guys. I ordered the accura "joint" for lack of better term from the Honda dealer today. It's the piece you push into the black box once removing the PCV valve. It should be here tomorrow.
Old 09-14-2012, 08:23 PM
  #5727  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
Maybe something XLR8 or others could fab? Seems like something the turbo crowd would want.

With the boombaracing checkvalve to catch can in place for crankcase vent, what's the downside to just leaving the existing PCV valve in place vs. deleting it? Do we expect it to fail, or actuate in addition to the boobaracing check valve?

Here's a PCV delete thread on the honda tech forum:
http://honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=3026220 (esp. see posts #9-17)
Im sure something can be made. I havent spent much time looking though.

The stock pcv will fail. Mine did twice. If it fails and gets stuck closed (or open, depending how you look at it), i believe the crankcase wont be able to vent under vacuum....but Im not sure on that.
Old 09-15-2012, 08:05 PM
  #5728  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
So issue with stock pcv is too much boost pressure would eventually break it, but you want to retain vacuum when not under boost to clear crankcase gasses, so why not add a check valve between intake manifold and stock pcv to prevent boost but allow vacuum?

Could you use the same check valves as the evap and brake booster?
http://www.usplastic.com/mobile/item...3369&catid=489

Last edited by bTwix; 09-15-2012 at 08:09 PM.
Old 09-15-2012, 09:14 PM
  #5729  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
The answers are a few pages back.
Old 09-16-2012, 01:32 PM
  #5730  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
The answers are a few pages back.
Ah, so the boomba check valve IS on the line from crankcase pcv to intake manifold. I thought stock pcv had a separate line, but liberts setup is: crankcase -> stock pcv valve -> tube -> oil separator (not vented catch can so vacuum is maintained) -> tube -> boomba racing check valve -> tube -> intake manifold, correct?

So in this setup the boomba check valve prevents the stock pcv from seeing boost, and the stock pcv will only see vacuum. The boomba check valve and oil separator essentially make the the stock pcv redundant, but if boomba check valve prevents stock pcv from seeing boost, why would stock pcv fail?

Seems like it would be nice to delete the stock pcv (since its entire function has been replaced by the boomba check valve and oil separator) but what harm would it cause leaving it in there, if only used to vacuum out crankcase gases? If it failed closed, you'd get degraded oil life? If so, could we just replace stock pcv as a regular maintenance item?

Sounds like the part we'd want is a pcv assembly that is simply an open pipe, or a cover plate, which would have the same effect.

Since existing pcv is held on by a single screw, can we just cut it off after the 1st o ring, to delete it?
http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/x,ca...,parttype,5052

Last edited by bTwix; 09-16-2012 at 01:42 PM.
Old 09-16-2012, 01:57 PM
  #5731  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Xiomaro
ugh, and mine is still being put back together...
having to do a new set of pistons, and waiting to see about another thang.

btwix, ur build is taking time away from mine, lol
Build is almost done, need to get check valves and oil separator now though, and possibly stock pcv delete.
Old 09-16-2012, 02:04 PM
  #5732  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Interesting vid of oil separator in action:
http://www.lsxtv.com/news/video-moro...tor-in-action/
Old 09-16-2012, 02:49 PM
  #5733  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Is this the oil separator you got?
http://store.excelerateperformance.c...r/g-62960.aspx
Old 09-16-2012, 03:08 PM
  #5734  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
libert69's can is a custom build by one of Rodney's guys.

I picked up one similar to his that is a little bigger and also baffled. Very much like this but a little less expensive.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pro-Series-O...e41c1d&vxp=mtr

I chose one with fittings on the bottom along with the top so if I find it filling up too fast, I may connect is to the turbo drain so it goes right back into the pan.
Old 09-16-2012, 03:32 PM
  #5735  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
Ah, so the boomba check valve IS on the line from crankcase pcv to intake manifold. I thought stock pcv had a separate line, but liberts setup is: crankcase -> stock pcv valve -> tube -> oil separator (not vented catch can so vacuum is maintained) -> tube -> boomba racing check valve -> tube -> intake manifold, correct?

So in this setup the boomba check valve prevents the stock pcv from seeing boost, and the stock pcv will only see vacuum. The boomba check valve and oil separator essentially make the the stock pcv redundant, but if boomba check valve prevents stock pcv from seeing boost, why would stock pcv fail?

Seems like it would be nice to delete the stock pcv (since its entire function has been replaced by the boomba check valve and oil separator) but what harm would it cause leaving it in there, if only used to vacuum out crankcase gases? If it failed closed, you'd get degraded oil life? If so, could we just replace stock pcv as a regular maintenance item?

Sounds like the part we'd want is a pcv assembly that is simply an open pipe, or a cover plate, which would have the same effect.

Since existing pcv is held on by a single screw, can we just cut it off after the 1st o ring, to delete it?
http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/x,ca...,parttype,5052
Since the stock PCV is a metering device snd a high flow check theres no reason to have them in series. You can always gut the stock valve so it becomes just a fitting. Or cut it or whatever works. You can get some unwanted effects from two check valves in series.

The important part is that you're not pressurizing the crankcase which will lead to the problems that Bert was experiencing like oil leaks, turbo not draining correctly, oil in the intercooler. Everything else is minor. The main downside of getting rid of the positive scavenging is you will have to change the oil more often but if you're running meth injection you should already be using a 3,000 mile OCI.
The following users liked this post:
bTwix (09-16-2012)
Old 09-16-2012, 03:51 PM
  #5736  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by KN_TL
libert69's can is a custom build by one of Rodney's guys.

I picked up one similar to his that is a little bigger and also baffled. Very much like this but a little less expensive.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pro-Series-O...e41c1d&vxp=mtr

I chose one with fittings on the bottom along with the top so if I find it filling up too fast, I may connect is to the turbo drain so it goes right back into the pan.
Bert has the vented catch can you mention (custom fab by Rodney), plus oil separator/catch can (looks like a moroso oil separator) for pcv vacuum tube to manifold, which can't be vented if you want to maintain vacuum for crank case ventilation.
Old 09-16-2012, 06:51 PM
  #5737  
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Hi speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Received 256 Likes on 208 Posts
I am looking at connecting the front and back crank case vents to an oil / air separator with it attached to the front IM vacuum port. I am hoping the IM will provide enough Vaccuum to evacuate any blow by I am getting. My filter is attached straight to the turbo and I don't want any oil going thru it so the IM will be my only source of vacuum.
Here is a pic of the separator I was looking at from Jegs and at $50, it's cheaper that other options I have looked at.
Name:  55552205.jpg
Views: 82
Size:  34.1 KB

I am also picking up boost from the top of the IM near the throttle and noticed Bert is using a port on the rear of the IM. Am I using the wrong location to pick up boost from? I will be doing my check valves soon and am wondering if I should pick up boost from Berts location so I can put a check valve on that port.
Old 09-16-2012, 07:49 PM
  #5738  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
Bert has the vented catch can you mention (custom fab by Rodney), plus oil separator/catch can (looks like a moroso oil separator) for pcv vacuum tube to manifold, which can't be vented if you want to maintain vacuum for crank case ventilation.
My bad. Totally missed those posts.
Old 09-16-2012, 10:08 PM
  #5739  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
I think it's a good idea to clarify that pre-turbo is a source of filtered air but it is not a source of vacuum. Post turbo has pressure but no vacuum. And obviously post throttlebody is both vacuum and boost.
Old 09-17-2012, 01:57 AM
  #5740  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69

10mm (3/8) crankcase check valve: http://boombaracing.com/cv.html

3/8 check valve for both evap and brake booster: http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/ite...3369&catid=489
Judging by the look of the PCV oil separator it's Moroso 85496:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/MOR-85496/
http://www.moroso.com/catalog/catego...?catcode=18549 (scroll all the way to the bottom)
Old 09-17-2012, 03:47 AM
  #5741  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
So issue with stock pcv is too much boost pressure would eventually break it, but you want to retain vacuum when not under boost to clear crankcase gasses, so why not add a check valve between intake manifold and stock pcv to prevent boost but allow vacuum?

Could you use the same check valves as the evap and brake booster?
http://www.usplastic.com/mobile/item...3369&catid=489
ummm, thats exactly what i did lol

Originally Posted by bTwix
Ah, so the boomba check valve IS on the line from crankcase pcv to intake manifold. I thought stock pcv had a separate line, but liberts setup is: crankcase -> stock pcv valve -> tube -> oil separator (not vented catch can so vacuum is maintained) -> tube -> boomba racing check valve -> tube -> intake manifold, correct?
yes. you dont need a 30$ check valve from boomba. the us plastic ones will work fine. I was just going for looks.

Originally Posted by bTwix
So in this setup the boomba check valve prevents the stock pcv from seeing boost, and the stock pcv will only see vacuum. The boomba check valve and oil separator essentially make the the stock pcv redundant, but if boomba check valve prevents stock pcv from seeing boost, why would stock pcv fail?
the stock pcv valve wont fail with the additional check valve in place. it failed on me prior to adding the checkvalve. the stock pcv valve was never intended to see 18lbs of boost.

Originally Posted by bTwix
Seems like it would be nice to delete the stock pcv (since its entire function has been replaced by the boomba check valve and oil separator) but what harm would it cause leaving it in there, if only used to vacuum out crankcase gases? If it failed closed, you'd get degraded oil life? If so, could we just replace stock pcv as a regular maintenance item?
I ultimately wanted to delete the stock pcv valve and tube because I already have a vented/baffled catch can coming off both valve covers. However, when I pulled the stock tube and capped the manifold and valve cover, the car would stall while idling. I have a feeling that if i can delete the pcv valve itself, and put some kind of block off plate on the opening, then I will be able to cap off the valve cover and the car wont stall. I think it was stalling b/c the valve was forced shut due to lack of vacuum from the IM pulling it open.

If I can delete the pcv valve then I wont need the additional oil separator on there.

Originally Posted by bTwix
Since existing pcv is held on by a single screw, can we just cut it off after the 1st o ring, to delete it?
I tried that and wound up destroying it. Its hard to explain but once you really look at the valve, youll see that cutting it probably wont work. I even tried to push the spring out and it didnt work.

Originally Posted by Hi speed
I am looking at connecting the front and back crank case vents to an oil / air separator with it attached to the front IM vacuum port. I am hoping the IM will provide enough Vaccuum to evacuate any blow by I am getting. My filter is attached straight to the turbo and I don't want any oil going thru it so the IM will be my only source of vacuum.
Here is a pic of the separator I was looking at from Jegs and at $50, it's cheaper that other options I have looked at.

I am also picking up boost from the top of the IM near the throttle and noticed Bert is using a port on the rear of the IM. Am I using the wrong location to pick up boost from? I will be doing my check valves soon and am wondering if I should pick up boost from Berts location so I can put a check valve on that port.
If you want to connect both valve covers to the catch can AND run it back to the IM, it will need to have 3 ports. OR you can connect the front and rear cover with a Y connector and you can use the can that you listed.

What do you mean "picking up boost?" Are you talking about the vacuum lines? If im reading what you wrote correctly, your saying that you are using the nipple that is on top of the manifold right after the inlet for your vacuum lines? If so, then where is your evap line connected too? You should be using the nipple on the rear of the manifold that was intended for the oem motor mounts vacuum lines.

Originally Posted by bTwix
Judging by the look of the PCV oil separator it's Moroso 85496:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/MOR-85496/
http://www.moroso.com/catalog/catego...?catcode=18549 (scroll all the way to the bottom)
theres plenty of catch cans out there. originality is what makes everyones car different.
The following users liked this post:
Hi speed (09-17-2012)
Old 09-17-2012, 11:53 PM
  #5742  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Just to confirm my understanding, we need breather tubes from the valve covers to the vented catch can:
- when IM has vacuum: so PCV can suck in clean air through crankcase => increased oil life
- when IM has boost: to relieve any crankcase pressure since boomba value may be forced shut by boost in IM => prevent oil going places it's not supposed to and keep your rings happy

At idle, we'd expect the IM to be sucking air from the vented catch can -> crankcase -> PCV -> IM (vacuum). However, since PCV is only on the front bank only, will only the front bank have gases scavenged? Or does the rear bank deposit blowby into the vented catch can, which then is sucked through the front bank, and into PCV -> IM, and then burned up? It doesn't seem like you'd have clean air flowing over the rear bank unless the opposite end of the rear valve cover had a PCV -> IM as well.
Old 09-18-2012, 12:28 AM
  #5743  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
I tried that and wound up destroying it. Its hard to explain but once you really look at the valve, youll see that cutting it probably wont work. I even tried to push the spring out and it didnt work.
For something more permanent, maybe remove the valve cover and use some JB Weld putty to plug up the hole? Spare valve covers are $113 if you ever need to go back.
Old 09-18-2012, 09:01 PM
  #5744  
Boosted...
iTrader: (2)
 
WBA-01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 80
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
I ultimately wanted to delete the stock pcv valve and tube because I already have a vented/baffled catch can coming off both valve covers. However, when I pulled the stock tube and capped the manifold and valve cover, the car would stall while idling. I have a feeling that if i can delete the pcv valve itself, and put some kind of block off plate on the opening, then I will be able to cap off the valve cover and the car wont stall. I think it was stalling b/c the valve was forced shut due to lack of vacuum from the IM pulling it open.

If I can delete the pcv valve then I wont need the additional oil separator on there.
If you want to fully delete the factory PVC system, check out a front valve cover from the 2000-2003 Tl's. It has the same bolt holes and tubes but no PCV. I know they fit, as i have done the swap myself (only inverted). I used an 04 rear valve cover to delete the PVC on my SC setup. And an extra bonus to removing the PVC it added a breather port on both valve covers (on the trany side). I was actually curious about your vented catch can, as it is what i need for mine as well.
The following users liked this post:
bTwix (09-19-2012)
Old 09-18-2012, 10:27 PM
  #5745  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
IMO, this is how it should go one of two ways on pretty much any car.

1)A breather on each valve cover. No true PCV (POSITIVE crankcase ventilation) which implies scavenging via vacuum in the IM. This provides a vent at all times for blowby. Nothing hooked to the air ducting including the IM, nothing to go wrong. The downside is you don't get a whole lot of fresh air in. I personally run this setup on my turbo car. I actually run an enclosed breather on one side, with an opening for a 3/4" hose that runs underneath the car in the hope that the low pressure area under the car will help to pull vapors from the open breather on the other side of the engine.

2)Fresh air taken pre-turbo delivered to the valve cover just like stock. Stock PCV routing from the other valve cover through a separator (optional) with no breather, a big aftermarket check valve, to the IM. The fresh air opening pre-turbo will give pressure (blowby) a place to go when under boost since the PCV valve shuts completely down and flow ceases through the valve when the IM goes under pressure. Basically it will backflow but only under boost. This is acceptable because the amount of oil vapors going through the intake tract will be minimal, only when under boost. I like this setup better but I chose the super reliable, simple way.
The following users liked this post:
bTwix (09-19-2012)
Old 09-19-2012, 05:38 PM
  #5746  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by WBA-01
If you want to fully delete the factory PVC system, check out a front valve cover from the 2000-2003 Tl's. It has the same bolt holes and tubes but no PCV. I know they fit, as i have done the swap myself (only inverted). I used an 04 rear valve cover to delete the PVC on my SC setup. And an extra bonus to removing the PVC it added a breather port on both valve covers (on the trany side). I was actually curious about your vented catch can, as it is what i need for mine as well.
The 2003 front valve cover has no PCV but also no dipstick:
http://www.oemacuraparts.com/parts-c...der-head-cover
Old 09-19-2012, 05:48 PM
  #5747  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
IMO, this is how it should go one of two ways on pretty much any car.

1)A breather on each valve cover. No true PCV (POSITIVE crankcase ventilation) which implies scavenging via vacuum in the IM. This provides a vent at all times for blowby. Nothing hooked to the air ducting including the IM, nothing to go wrong. The downside is you don't get a whole lot of fresh air in. I personally run this setup on my turbo car. I actually run an enclosed breather on one side, with an opening for a 3/4" hose that runs underneath the car in the hope that the low pressure area under the car will help to pull vapors from the open breather on the other side of the engine.

2)Fresh air taken pre-turbo delivered to the valve cover just like stock. Stock PCV routing from the other valve cover through a separator (optional) with no breather, a big aftermarket check valve, to the IM. The fresh air opening pre-turbo will give pressure (blowby) a place to go when under boost since the PCV valve shuts completely down and flow ceases through the valve when the IM goes under pressure. Basically it will backflow but only under boost. This is acceptable because the amount of oil vapors going through the intake tract will be minimal, only when under boost. I like this setup better but I chose the super reliable, simple way.
For #2, you suggest stock routing of breather tube from rear valve cover and stock routing of PCV from front valve cover, which is consistent with http://www.oemacuraparts.com/parts-c.../breather-tube and http://www.oemacuraparts.com/parts-c...head-cover--06. However, I don't see any tube that connects the front cover to the rear cover directly, so when IM sees boost and boomba checkvalue shut, how would blowby from the front cover escape to protect the rings?

For #1, do you connect your draft tube to both front and rear valve covers, or just a single cover (front or rear)?

Last edited by bTwix; 09-19-2012 at 05:52 PM.
Old 09-19-2012, 07:00 PM
  #5748  
Boosted...
iTrader: (2)
 
WBA-01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 80
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
The 2003 front valve cover has no PCV but also no dipstick:
http://www.oemacuraparts.com/parts-c...der-head-cover
So maybe that's not an option then, my car has the external dip stick setup, so i didn't even notice the lack of a hole. Plus i was more worried about the back cover on mine.
Old 09-19-2012, 08:14 PM
  #5749  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
For #2, you suggest stock routing of breather tube from rear valve cover and stock routing of PCV from front valve cover, which is consistent with http://www.oemacuraparts.com/parts-c.../breather-tube and http://www.oemacuraparts.com/parts-c...head-cover--06. However, I don't see any tube that connects the front cover to the rear cover directly, so when IM sees boost and boomba checkvalue shut, how would blowby from the front cover escape to protect the rings?

For #1, do you connect your draft tube to both front and rear valve covers, or just a single cover (front or rear)?
The front and rear banks are connected by a common crank case. The factory typically has fresh air enter one valve cover, down through the head, through the block picking up vapors and bad stuff, back up the other head through the PCV valve and into the IM to be burned. It creates a crossflow, pushing vapors out and bringing fresh air in to reduce varnish and sludge and extend oil changes. The bottom of the cylinders where any blowby would come from are centered only inches from each other so vapors can exit out of either valve cover, it's all the same. With only a breather on each valvecover and without the crossflow through the crank case you still vent any pressure but you no longer have fresh air entering the crank case and acids and "crap" build up which is why I say to shorten the OCI.

So in #2, fresh air enters one valve cover and exits the other and into the IM during normal operation. When you go under boost, the crossflow momentarily stops and all venting is done through the fresh air side and goes through the turbo and intake tract which is fine.

In #1 it vents the same whether under vacuum or boost but you get no fresh air.
The following users liked this post:
bTwix (09-21-2012)
Old 09-19-2012, 11:01 PM
  #5750  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
With the front and rear banks connected, is there any benefit to running two breather tubes, one off each bank (like libert's setup, and probably the way mine is being setup now) if you're going to retain the pcv?
Old 09-19-2012, 11:14 PM
  #5751  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
With the front and rear banks connected, is there any benefit to running two breather tubes, one off each bank (like libert's setup, and probably the way mine is being setup now) if you're going to retain the pcv?
If you have the PCV and a breather on the same valve cover its just going to pull fresh air from the breather and send it to the IM. If you have only one breather and its opposite the PCV valve its forced to pull fresh air through the engine. The stock routing is perfectly fine with a turbo. The fresh air will come pre turbo or via a breather. The PCV valve gets upgraded, you can add a non vented catch can between the IM and PCV valve, and you have a functional PCV system.
Old 09-19-2012, 11:50 PM
  #5752  
Three Wheelin'
 
HQTL6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spring TX
Age: 38
Posts: 1,329
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
^IHC your inbox is full, i'd like to pm you about something
Old 09-20-2012, 03:19 PM
  #5753  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
If you have the PCV and a breather on the same valve cover its just going to pull fresh air from the breather and send it to the IM. If you have only one breather and its opposite the PCV valve its forced to pull fresh air through the engine. The stock routing is perfectly fine with a turbo. The fresh air will come pre turbo or via a breather. The PCV valve gets upgraded, you can add a non vented catch can between the IM and PCV valve, and you have a functional PCV system.
OK, it looks like Libert's setup (and mine) were designed for a full PCV delete since both banks are routed to a vented catch can and then to pre-turbo intake.



If I want to retain the PCV function, I should be running the stock tube (or larger tube) from the rear valve cover to the pre-turbo intake (with no vented catch can in between - maybe oil separator?), and that will be sufficient to relieve blowby crankcase pressure while under boost, when the upgraded PCV boomba value is shut?
Old 09-20-2012, 07:40 PM
  #5754  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by bTwix
If I want to retain the PCV function, I should be running the stock tube (or larger tube) from the rear valve cover to the pre-turbo intake (with no vented catch can in between - maybe oil separator?), and that will be sufficient to relieve blowby crankcase pressure while under boost, when the upgraded PCV boomba value is shut?
That's what I think he's saying.

Is there an advantage to running the rear fresh air supply pre-turbo vs just having a filter on the fitting getting fresh air from under the hood?

I've got a vented can on the bench right now but if a non-vented can in the PCV loop works with the upgraded valve, I would rather go that way. I am running out of room to add stuff under the hood.
Old 09-20-2012, 08:46 PM
  #5755  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
A separator should always be on the vacuum side, never the fresh air side unless you're worried about the few seconds you're under boost putting vapors through the intake tract when it backflows.

The main advantage of getting fresh air preturbo is if you have a lot of blowby. The breather filter can become saturated with oil. I've had that happen and the oil would drip on the headers and create small fires. As long as the engine is healthy there are no problems. Not that it's necessary but the preturbo will have a very slight vacuum under boost to help a little. Not really enough to matter and if it is your preturbo intake tract is too restrictive.
Old 09-21-2012, 12:49 AM
  #5756  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
I'll ping Rodney and see about retaining the factory PCV routing, with fresh air directly from pre-turbo with no catch can, and then delete factory PCV value (cover plate or JB Weld), and adding an oil separator and boomba check valve on the manifold side to retain the PCV function.

Improved OCI, emissions, and this video series on blowby/PCV http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&fe...&v=3JYut_eyw-k, all make a good argument for retaining the PCV function.

Sounds like entirely deleting the PCV system would make the car run more rich (less air drawn into IM), and an open pipe (no stock PCV valve/spring metering airflow) would make the car run more lean (more air flow), so sounds like the final PCV setup should be in place prior to the tune.

Last edited by bTwix; 09-21-2012 at 01:02 AM.
Old 09-21-2012, 01:11 AM
  #5757  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
If you're going to watch the PCV/blowby videos, I'd start with this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=rs6YtHUscCA
Old 09-21-2012, 01:43 AM
  #5758  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
One additional idea on retaining factory PCV flow through the engine when not under boost, while retaining both front and rear valve cover breather tubes that libert and I already have in place, is to put an additional boomba check valve on the front valve cover vent tube so it's not used as a fresh air source, but could be used to relieve excessive crankcase pressure while under boost.

Also, having the front and rear valve covers vent to a vented catch can (liberts and my current setup) would only vent to atmosphere under major boost, in which case we're definitely not standing still so less of an issue.

Adding the 2nd boomba check valve seems like the best of both worlds, since it would retain factory PCV air flow from rear valve cover through entire crankcase, and then out the front valve cover to IM and then burned off, while providing an extra measure of protection for venting the crankcase while under boost.
Old 09-21-2012, 09:46 AM
  #5759  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
A separator should always be on the vacuum side, never the fresh air side unless you're worried about the few seconds you're under boost putting vapors through the intake tract when it backflows.

The main advantage of getting fresh air preturbo is if you have a lot of blowby. The breather filter can become saturated with oil. I've had that happen and the oil would drip on the headers and create small fires. As long as the engine is healthy there are no problems. Not that it's necessary but the preturbo will have a very slight vacuum under boost to help a little. Not really enough to matter and if it is your preturbo intake tract is too restrictive.
So if I have a vented catch can on the fresh air side, I really don't need to plumb it pre-turbo/air filter? Is there any advantage having both covers open to fresh air with the check valve as btwix describes?

EDIT: Just checked my little filter, it's got oil on it so I see what you mean. Not enough to be dripping but if I put my hand on it I get some oil.....

Last edited by KN_TL; 09-21-2012 at 09:54 AM.
Old 09-21-2012, 07:54 PM
  #5760  
Racer
 
bTwix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 410
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Here's a picture.

If retaining factory PCV air flow, there are three options for fresh air side:
a) keep setup in pic below, but add a check valve to front tube, so no fresh air in, but allow pressure out.
b) eliminate front vent tube entirely, so fresh air only enters rear cover, but keep the vented catch can
c) eliminate everything except single tube from rear cover to pre-turbo intake, which is the factory setup



Quick Reply: Turbo Kit for Acura TL '04-'08



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.