TL Diet 2.0/Track Car Build - Roll Cage Pg 51

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2012, 08:31 AM
  #921  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
I think a PNP'd new IM and TB is possible, would it be stupid to run that without the JR ECU? Only reason I ask is because I take a lot of points for a modified ECU and wouldn't mind avoiding it if possible.

Anything extreme is kinda out for me (like dual TB's) just cuz I still want to compete with the car and it'd be a nightmare to get classed correctly with a lot of those mods.
Old 09-03-2012, 12:53 PM
  #922  
Instructor
 
fraiolim07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Montana
Age: 34
Posts: 116
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by vill0169
I think a PNP'd new IM and TB is possible, would it be stupid to run that without the JR ECU? Only reason I ask is because I take a lot of points for a modified ECU and wouldn't mind avoiding it if possible.

Anything extreme is kinda out for me (like dual TB's) just cuz I still want to compete with the car and it'd be a nightmare to get classed correctly with a lot of those mods.
If I've understood the threads about the PnP'd TB and IM you don't need the new ECU. Sorry for the useless "I think" response
Old 09-03-2012, 02:18 PM
  #923  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,075
Received 8,221 Likes on 4,853 Posts
The stock ECU can compensate for the PnP intake.
Old 09-03-2012, 03:38 PM
  #924  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
Originally Posted by vill0169
I think a PNP'd new IM and TB is possible, would it be stupid to run that without the JR ECU? Only reason I ask is because I take a lot of points for a modified ECU and wouldn't mind avoiding it if possible.

Anything extreme is kinda out for me (like dual TB's) just cuz I still want to compete with the car and it'd be a nightmare to get classed correctly with a lot of those mods.
yes you can do all the bolt ons without the ECU...

Bigger intake filter (more surface area)
Bored TB
Ported and polished Manifold
Ported and polished runners

You can actually even port and polish your heads and still be ok without a manifold....another thing i would do is the Type S cams....

you will benefit the most from header work if you have an ECU but you can still pull out a lot of HP/TQ from the above mentioned options...
Old 09-03-2012, 07:39 PM
  #925  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Originally Posted by swoosh
yes you can do all the bolt ons without the ECU...

Bigger intake filter (more surface area)
Bored TB
Ported and polished Manifold
Ported and polished runners

You can actually even port and polish your heads and still be ok without a manifold....another thing i would do is the Type S cams....

you will benefit the most from header work if you have an ECU but you can still pull out a lot of HP/TQ from the above mentioned options...

Yeah I would like to do PNP'd everything including the MDX spacer I have. Has it been shown what the TL-S cams are worth on a J32 with no ecu?

Question: Has anyone ever ported and polished the exhaust "chamber" on the head where the PCD bolts up? It looks like there's plenty of material there to at least do something.
Old 09-03-2012, 10:25 PM
  #926  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
Originally Posted by vill0169
Yeah I would like to do PNP'd everything including the MDX spacer I have. Has it been shown what the TL-S cams are worth on a J32 with no ecu?

Question: Has anyone ever ported and polished the exhaust "chamber" on the head where the PCD bolts up? It looks like there's plenty of material there to at least do something.
well once you port and polish the manifold and the runners, remove the MDX spacer as it will rob you of the top end....I know Andy experienced it and I experienced the same.....seemed like the car had no power past 6000 rpm where you will be most of the time when on a track....you will get decent low end but you will be robbed of high end....

Andy went all the way and put bisi stage 2 cams on the car without a tune and it did gain him quite a lot....after the ECU and tune his base was a monster....so am only guessing the bisi stage 1 or the hollow and aggressive type S cams will do well on your(any base) car....

finally, yes that is the port and polish job on the heads....a 3 angle intake, 5 angle exhaust job with razor cut edges along with higher psi springs and retainers and aftermarket valves will benefit you much....if you do this and ECU and tune and cams....you can lift the rev limiter and redline at 8K rpm....all the power

well that is atleast my plan LOL along with a stroker 3.6L build
Old 09-04-2012, 09:30 AM
  #927  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Yeah I can see that with the MDX spacer, good to know. I wouldn't mind doing the Type S cams cuz they're cheap and OEM but hope they'll give me something in gains.

Now if I could get some sponsors....I'm open to anything lol
Old 09-04-2012, 09:52 AM
  #928  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ well that only happens when you port and polish your runners/manifold....the mdx spacer creates turbulence inside....now if we could slice the spacer in 2, i think it will be just perfect....

and for the way you run, you should already be sponsored....have you reached out to someone?
Old 09-04-2012, 10:13 AM
  #929  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Yeah a bit but it usually seems to fall through for some reason or another. Even my STI team has difficulties finding sponsors.


Another idea I'm really considering is adding a relocted oil filter with temp and pressure gauges and an oil cooler. My water temps never exceed 210 but I would like to start monitoring my oil as well and see where it runs usually.
Old 09-04-2012, 11:06 AM
  #930  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ yeah oil temp is something which i think the ECU should monitor but am not sure if it does....i know it does monitor the fuel pressure....
Old 09-04-2012, 11:34 AM
  #931  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
gerzand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Age: 39
Posts: 1,505
Received 392 Likes on 202 Posts
Originally Posted by swoosh
^^^ yeah oil temp is something which i think the ECU should monitor but am not sure if it does....i know it does monitor the fuel pressure....
Have you seen the read-out for fuel pressure? Whats it say? Is it in the proper units?
Old 09-04-2012, 11:36 AM
  #932  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ slap me now please....

i meant fuel flow....i forget the units but the Torque app has it in gallons/minute and this is off the OBDII port
The following users liked this post:
gerzand (09-04-2012)
Old 09-04-2012, 11:41 AM
  #933  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
It might but it'll be easy to add a gauge with the oil cooler setup. Boy nothing like a track weekend to remind you of the list of to-do's I'd like to get done lol
Old 09-04-2012, 12:22 PM
  #934  
Moderator
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
iTrader: (6)
 
rockstar143's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 77,942
Received 19,960 Likes on 14,480 Posts
I always thoroughly enjoy your updates...amazing.
Old 09-04-2012, 06:21 PM
  #935  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
^^ Thanks man, just wish my budget and time to get to the track were both greater lol
Old 09-05-2012, 09:40 AM
  #936  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ dont we all wish the same
Old 09-06-2012, 07:37 AM
  #937  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Thinking about hitting up my local track in a couple weeks and doing some aero testing now that I have the Aim Solo. Thinking of at least doing a session with and without the splitter/wing and see if there is any noticable difference between the lap times. This lap timer is just amazing and gives some incredible data that I'm sure you'll all enjoy. I just hope my hoosiers hold up to few more track days. we'll see......
Old 09-06-2012, 09:19 AM
  #938  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
am very eager to see this....i am considering doing some aerodynamic mods....
Old 09-06-2012, 09:53 AM
  #939  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
yeah I just hope the numbers are in the aero's favor lol. which they should be, especially with the my more flat wing setting right now.
Old 09-06-2012, 10:00 AM
  #940  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
can you hit a lap with the splitter/diffuser and without the wing

that will be the setup i would be running most prolly...
Old 09-06-2012, 10:43 AM
  #941  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
I can remove everything but the diffuser, that thing is pretty much on there for good.
Old 09-06-2012, 10:49 AM
  #942  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
perfect....

coz am not sure if i will throw a wing on there but am definitely gonna install a diffuser + splitter soon....
Old 09-07-2012, 10:11 AM
  #943  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
just realized I still have the V2 j pipe. Could squeeze out some more power with the V3 I guess. Would probably have re-do my exhaust though...
Old 09-07-2012, 10:48 AM
  #944  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ well depends....

the Richie V3 makes more power in the lower part of the power band due to the longer primaries....the ATLP V2 moves the power band up....

I think if you get the V3 and have a 3" merge collector in there you will make the most of the jpipe....and the 3" pipe will flow perfectly with the 3" exhaust you have...
Old 09-07-2012, 11:02 AM
  #945  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Yeah I emailed him to see what the best choice would be. Mid range power is always good for pulling the car out of a corner but top end is obviously important too. I just want the power bump with keeping the exhaust light.
Old 09-07-2012, 12:37 PM
  #946  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
check this video out:


so the mid end is the same in both....the only time you will see a difference is you take it to your exhaust guy and ask em to make a 3" merge collector with a venturi tube....and then a 3" exhaust....

you will def see a lot more tq/hp from the low end all the way to top end by that....

you can also do an exhaust cut out/dump like Andy (gerzand) has done...\

will reply to your PM after lunch
The following users liked this post:
Morrissey25 (09-08-2012)
Old 09-07-2012, 03:49 PM
  #947  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
interesting video for sure, so by adding the 3" verturi to the V3, it keeps the lower end advantage over the ATLP but adds some top end and makes it more or less equal to the ATLP V2?
Old 09-07-2012, 04:33 PM
  #948  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by swoosh
can you hit a lap with the splitter/diffuser and without the wing

that will be the setup i would be running most prolly...
A splitter on a street driven car is not a good idea. If it's low enough to be effective, you're going to be running into parking stoppers, gutters, things you never paid attention to before. For the street, tacking on to the factory splash guard, making it closer to the ground is pretty effective, it's not as far forward, and it's ok if it scrapes. So it has some advantages such as durability and it's pretty effective at keeping air out from under the car. The downside is the air will have to go up through the radiator, engine bay, and out of the cowl instead of around the front end. It's a compromise but a functioning splitter on the street is going to be a nightmare.

If you go with one, the best thing you can do is make it easily adjustable, preferably on the fly to where it can be retracted below certain speeds and automatically lower at freeway speeds. It's ineffective at city speeds anyway and many aero mods don't do a whole lot until you're near triple digits. I would shoot for zero lift and call it a day. Vent the fender wells, reduce airflow under the car, reduce airflow around the radiator, done.
Old 09-08-2012, 04:45 PM
  #949  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,075
Received 8,221 Likes on 4,853 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
If you go with one, the best thing you can do is make it easily adjustable, preferably on the fly to where it can be retracted below certain speeds and automatically lower at freeway speeds. It's ineffective at city speeds anyway and many aero mods don't do a whole lot until you're near triple digits. I would shoot for zero lift and call it a day. Vent the fender wells, reduce airflow under the car, reduce airflow around the radiator, done.
Similar to the front air dam "wings" on the 458...I wonder if its easy enough to mimic something like that on a splitter - without spending a crap load of money on it. The 458 uses the force of the air to force the wings down to increase downforce, so there won't be any need for actuators or anything like that that could potentially fail. It might be an avenue to explore
Old 09-08-2012, 05:39 PM
  #950  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
Similar to the front air dam "wings" on the 458...I wonder if its easy enough to mimic something like that on a splitter - without spending a crap load of money on it. The 458 uses the force of the air to force the wings down to increase downforce, so there won't be any need for actuators or anything like that that could potentially fail. It might be an avenue to explore
It would be easy to build but the testing would be a little harder. Without a wind tunnel, you would have to have a friend drive in front of you as you slowly accelerate to find the right spring tension so it lowers at the right speed. That really would be the best of all worlds. It's out of the way when it's ineffective anyway which happens to be when it's most likely to get smashed and it's down when it's most effective and least likely to get damaged.

I think the material would have to be really light. I can only imagine if the springs are weak enough that the wind can overcome them, if the splitter is too heavy, it will be bouncing up and down as it goes over bumps. Carbon fiber or something similar would probably be a good idea to keep it up when it needs to be up where only the wind can bring it down.

Last edited by I hate cars; 09-08-2012 at 05:49 PM.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (09-08-2012)
Old 09-08-2012, 08:57 PM
  #951  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Started making a mount for my new Aim Solo GPS lap timer today. Hopefully get it wrapped up tomorrow so it'll be ready for the local track day coming up in a couple weeks. Thing has so many features to offer, both in real time on track and in analysis post session it's amazing! Certainly lucky to have it!

Name:  0908121255.jpg
Views: 130
Size:  59.7 KB

Name:  0908121256.jpg
Views: 125
Size:  64.6 KB
Old 09-09-2012, 05:23 PM
  #952  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
So Swoosh or anyone really...

Has anyone made up the full parts list for the 3.7L IM/TB setup? More for the necessary hardware and smaller bits aside from the IM/Cover/TB which are givens. Just thinking about doing it but if I'm ditching my IM Spacer, I'll need to go back down to the shorter studs and whatnot. Just want to make sure I don't miss anything if I choose to order the parts. Thanks.
Old 09-09-2012, 05:46 PM
  #953  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Anybody using these? Seems like a good product/design but pretty spendy...

http://www.heeltoeauto.com/fastline-...x-tl-tl-s.html
Old 09-10-2012, 09:59 AM
  #954  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
Originally Posted by vill0169
interesting video for sure, so by adding the 3" verturi to the V3, it keeps the lower end advantage over the ATLP but adds some top end and makes it more or less equal to the ATLP V2?
PM sonnick....he has a similar setup and he gained a lot from that jpipe....

Originally Posted by I hate cars
A splitter on a street driven car is not a good idea. If it's low enough to be effective, you're going to be running into parking stoppers, gutters, things you never paid attention to before. For the street, tacking on to the factory splash guard, making it closer to the ground is pretty effective, it's not as far forward, and it's ok if it scrapes. So it has some advantages such as durability and it's pretty effective at keeping air out from under the car. The downside is the air will have to go up through the radiator, engine bay, and out of the cowl instead of around the front end. It's a compromise but a functioning splitter on the street is going to be a nightmare.

If you go with one, the best thing you can do is make it easily adjustable, preferably on the fly to where it can be retracted below certain speeds and automatically lower at freeway speeds. It's ineffective at city speeds anyway and many aero mods don't do a whole lot until you're near triple digits. I would shoot for zero lift and call it a day. Vent the fender wells, reduce airflow under the car, reduce airflow around the radiator, done.
LOL i scratched up my front aspec lip within minutes of installing because i parked tooo close to the parking stopper....learned my lesson very very soon to keep a good 6-8 inches () between the car and the parking stopper.....

but those are some great suggestions....now you got me thinking around the lines of the Home Depot lip and the factory splash guard....the home depot lip will restrict some air from getting under the car since its kinda rigid and the factory splash guard will further restrict the air from getting under the car....

another good thing about the factory guard is "cooling"....I took that off couple months back and my underhood temps have been constantly higher....

will let you know how it goes IHC

Originally Posted by vill0169
So Swoosh or anyone really...

Has anyone made up the full parts list for the 3.7L IM/TB setup? More for the necessary hardware and smaller bits aside from the IM/Cover/TB which are givens. Just thinking about doing it but if I'm ditching my IM Spacer, I'll need to go back down to the shorter studs and whatnot. Just want to make sure I don't miss anything if I choose to order the parts. Thanks.
I have the list....here it is:


16400-RKG-A01 2011 TL SHAWD Qty:1 - Throttle Body (includes MAP sensor, Oring washer, etc)
95701-08060-08 2011 TL SHAWD Qty: 4 - Throttle Body Bolts
17140-RK1-A01 2011 TL SHAWD Qty: 1 - Intake Manifold Cover (includes Bypass Valve, Bore Plate, etc)
17160-RK2-A00 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 1 - Intake Manifold
17181-RCJ-A00 - 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 1 - EGR Pipe
92900-06014-0B - 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 2 - Bolts
95701-06035-08 - 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 2 - Bolts
95701-08065-08 - 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 7 - Bolts
90104-RCJ-A00 - 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 10 - Bolts
90201-P8E-A00 - 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 2 - Nuts
94050-08080 - 2011 TL SHAWD Qty 2 - Nuts

All the nuts and bolts from the 3G TL will fit the 2012 manifold but I ordered them to be on the safer side....

Grab the coupon code link from my sig, email Tim @ AcuraOEMparts and tell him swoosh send ya....he hooked me up with this order
Old 09-10-2012, 11:33 AM
  #955  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
hell of a post Anil, thanks! lol
Old 09-10-2012, 01:40 PM
  #956  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
you're welcome buddy....replying to all PM's now
Old 09-10-2012, 01:53 PM
  #957  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
fingers crossed for good news!
Old 09-10-2012, 01:58 PM
  #958  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts


btw wanted to ask you something....you still have your old driver side OEM seat brackets?
Old 09-10-2012, 04:34 PM
  #959  
AZ Track Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
No sorry I don't.
Old 09-10-2012, 04:36 PM
  #960  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts


Quick Reply: TL Diet 2.0/Track Car Build - Roll Cage Pg 51



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.