Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

C&P Random Thread -

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 05:12 PM
  #5041  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
I like this marketing by Pop chips....

http://www.flickr.com/photos/delobbo/7986710338/http://www.flickr.com/photos/delobbo/7986710338/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/delobbo/, on Flickr
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 05:16 PM
  #5042  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084



We need a top body part smile for her...
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 04:52 PM
  #5043  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
I guess Sony is trying to save money (well I don't blame them) - the RX100 does not come with a printed manual.

you get a link to this:
http://www.sony.com.hk/svcfiles/faq/...100/index.html
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 05:47 PM
  #5044  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,082
Likes: 3,683
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by srika
I guess Sony is trying to save money (well I don't blame them) - the RX100 does not come with a printed manual.

you get a link to this:
http://www.sony.com.hk/svcfiles/faq/...100/index.html
I'm pretty sure I've seen other products going this route (not Sony products)
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 06:12 PM
  #5045  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
well yes, but those are generally lower-priced and not-as-serious things.... right? It's just surprising that for such a complicated device as this there is no manual in the box
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #5046  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,082
Likes: 3,683
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by srika
well yes, but those are generally lower-priced and not-as-serious things.... right? It's just surprising that for such a complicated device as this there is no manual in the box
Meh, having access online on the fly (because most people have smartphones these days ) is easier anyway IMO, but whatever

Besides, one can argue that it's "greener " going paperless.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #5047  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
yea, alot of devices are starting to not come with them.

with smart phones and tablets and PCs you can just download the PDF of the manual and look at it there.

less crap to carry, saves companies on shipping and packaging material and saves trees and fuel.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 07:18 PM
  #5048  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
get with the times man!
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 07:21 PM
  #5049  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Srika!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-EOS-5D...orcev4exp=true

DO IT!! GO GO GO GO GO GO!

its from adorama too!
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 08:04 PM
  #5050  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
forgot you had one already
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 11:36 PM
  #5051  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,348
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
now the FB post makes sense now.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 03:06 AM
  #5052  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
Originally Posted by Mizouse
yea, alot of devices are starting to not come with them.

with smart phones and tablets and PCs you can just download the PDF of the manual and look at it there.

less crap to carry, saves companies on shipping and packaging material and saves trees and fuel.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 03:20 AM
  #5053  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 03:23 AM
  #5054  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 04:23 AM
  #5055  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
with all the advancements being made in photo industry, I'm annoyed that nobody is making a 15-135 or something around there, that works with FF. It can be f/4.0 on the wide end. basically a UWA zoom. it could even be 15-70 or 15-50. it doesn't have to be that big a range.

the 17-40 is close but that 40mm is just not enough many times. and 17 is not wide enough many times.


Last edited by srika; Sep 16, 2012 at 04:26 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 04:27 AM
  #5056  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
screw it, I want something like a 12-50 or 12-70.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 05:20 AM
  #5057  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
you can only do so much with the law of physics limiting you...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 10:24 AM
  #5058  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
I'm not convinced - I think technology can overcome optical physics.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 11:37 AM
  #5059  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #5060  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
what's so funny? Olympus does make a 12-50 lens, for 4/3. the companies are being lazy, they need to make lenses like that that will work with APS-C and FF.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 12:14 PM
  #5061  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 12:18 PM
  #5062  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084


Nikkor 1200-1700mm: The Mother of All Super Telephoto Nikon Lenses. Weighing in at 36 pounds and measuring nearly 3 feet in length, the manual focus lens was introduced in 1993 and had a hefty price tag of $60,000.

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography...12001700mm.htm
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 12:23 PM
  #5063  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by srika
what's so funny? Olympus does make a 12-50 lens, for 4/3. the companies are being lazy, they need to make lenses like that that will work with APS-C and FF.
The 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 ED M.Zuiko EZ Micro 4/3 Lens (Black) from Olympus is a compact, lightweight 4.2x zoom lens that covers a lot of ground. With a digital-dedicated design as well as multi-coating on all lens surfaces, this exceptionally lightweight (7.44 oz/211 g) Micro 4/3 lens boasts very high imaging performance. Covering wide-angle to telephoto focal lengths (35mm equivalent of 24-100mm)
They already make a lens like that but for APS-C/FF
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 12:24 PM
  #5064  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
and you get an extra 5mm and constant f4 too!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 12:41 PM
  #5065  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
Originally Posted by Mizouse
and you get an extra 5mm and constant f4 too!
link?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 01:09 PM
  #5066  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by srika
link?
ehh...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/2005/8/22/canonlenses

The 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 ED M.Zuiko EZ Micro 4/3 Lens (Black) from Olympus is a compact, lightweight 4.2x zoom lens that covers a lot of ground. With a digital-dedicated design as well as multi-coating on all lens surfaces, this exceptionally lightweight (7.44 oz/211 g) Micro 4/3 lens boasts very high imaging performance. Covering wide-angle to telephoto focal lengths (35mm equivalent of 24-100mm)
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 06:55 PM
  #5067  
MWalsh9152's Avatar
all work and no play
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,916
Likes: 134
From: Wakefield, Ma
why cant my Blackberry have better low light ability to catch a quick moving object?

I was in PBR Baltimore the other night, and the attention whore were lining up to ride the mechanical bull in their dress' and mini skirts, KNOWING that every time one of them does, at first the front of her panties is totally exposed, and 3 out of 5 of them then end up laid out over the front of the bull with her ass in the air, skirt bunched up to her belly button
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 08:14 AM
  #5068  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Olympus makes a 15 mm body cap lens...

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/09/17/...as-a-body-cap/





Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 11:08 AM
  #5069  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
It seems Google just bought Nik Software, do NOT like!!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 11:10 AM
  #5070  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
whoa
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 11:32 AM
  #5071  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,493
Likes: 5,869
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Olympus makes a 15 mm body cap lens...

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/09/17/...as-a-body-cap/





f/8 booooooooooooo
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 11:34 AM
  #5072  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Though that is a drawback, this is very nice. You always have a lens on the camera, that if you need to take a picture, you just move the lever.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #5073  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Giggity
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 03:53 PM
  #5074  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
I was thinking something about patents - you know how Apple sued Samsung for that stuff - I wonder how Canon feels about companies blatantly ripping off their S-series focus ring?

That seems like a much more tangible and arguable design function, I mean compared with the kind of things Apple is suing for. Apple = blood thirsty monopolistic carnivores
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 03:55 PM
  #5075  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by srika
I was thinking something about patents - you know how Apple sued Samsung for that stuff - I wonder how Canon feels about companies blatantly ripping off their S-series focus ring?

That seems like a much more tangible and arguable design function, I mean compared with the kind of things Apple is suing for. Apple = blood thirsty monopolistic carnivores
You have to look at the patent first, and then who's to say they don't pay Canon is it is an issue.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 03:57 PM
  #5076  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,153
Likes: 14,305
oh you're saying Sony may have got the rights to use the ring from Canon? for some reason I highly doubt that.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 04:04 PM
  #5077  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
If its patented then I don't see why not.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 04:05 PM
  #5078  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by srika
oh you're saying Sony may have got the rights to use the ring from Canon? for some reason I highly doubt that.
Then look into it before shooting off your mouth, , :wink: companies do pay other companies for use of patents.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 04:15 PM
  #5079  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,122
Likes: 3,372
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Did you know that Nikon uses Sony sensors?


Impossible! Why would one company use anothers technology in their product!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 04:23 PM
  #5080  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Did you know that Nikon uses Sony sensors?


Impossible! Why would one company use anothers technology in their product!
But that is a business relationship, they are actually buying a product.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.