Acura: TSX News
#2681
I was a bit torn.... the pics from Acura definitely make it better than the other shots posted on an earlier page. But then I saw this...
^that is one of the hottest TSXs I've ever seen. It makes the TSX look so futuristic and er, passive aggressive? No, subtly aggressive. I love that front end, reinforces my belief that the TSX is the best looking current Acura IMO, even stock.
^that is one of the hottest TSXs I've ever seen. It makes the TSX look so futuristic and er, passive aggressive? No, subtly aggressive. I love that front end, reinforces my belief that the TSX is the best looking current Acura IMO, even stock.
Last edited by Costco; 11-23-2010 at 09:19 AM.
#2683
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
I'm not feeling the fog lights whatsoever. It makes the car look like it got sucker-punched.
#2684
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
I was a bit torn.... the pics from Acura definitely make it better than the other shots posted on an earlier page. But then I saw this...
^that is one of the hottest TSXs I've ever seen. It makes the TSX look so futuristic and er, passive aggressive? No, subtly aggressive. I love that front end, reinforces my belief that the TSX is the best looking current Acura IMO, even stock.
^that is one of the hottest TSXs I've ever seen. It makes the TSX look so futuristic and er, passive aggressive? No, subtly aggressive. I love that front end, reinforces my belief that the TSX is the best looking current Acura IMO, even stock.
#2685
http://www.acura.com/Features.aspx?m...th__quiet_ride
Smooth engines and a rigid body are just the beginning for creating the TSX’s smooth, quiet and refined ride characteristics. The following are just a few examples of the efforts to reduce noise and vibration:
To reduce wind noise, long, smooth floor panels and a series of underbody fairings control airflow underneath the car and around the front and rear tires.
As opposed to most vehicles’ hollow roof pillars, TSX roof pillars are sealed internally, dramatically reducing noise and vibration.
Floating front and rear suspension subframes are rubber-mounted to reduce road and suspension noise, vibration and harshness.
Flush window and moonroof moldings and windshield wipers positioned below the hood line reduce air turbulence.
Exterior mirror housings are aerodynamically shaped to further reduce turbulence.
Smooth engines and a rigid body are just the beginning for creating the TSX’s smooth, quiet and refined ride characteristics. The following are just a few examples of the efforts to reduce noise and vibration:
To reduce wind noise, long, smooth floor panels and a series of underbody fairings control airflow underneath the car and around the front and rear tires.
As opposed to most vehicles’ hollow roof pillars, TSX roof pillars are sealed internally, dramatically reducing noise and vibration.
Floating front and rear suspension subframes are rubber-mounted to reduce road and suspension noise, vibration and harshness.
Flush window and moonroof moldings and windshield wipers positioned below the hood line reduce air turbulence.
Exterior mirror housings are aerodynamically shaped to further reduce turbulence.
#2686
Senior Moderator
I was a bit torn.... the pics from Acura definitely make it better than the other shots posted on an earlier page. But then I saw this...
^that is one of the hottest TSXs I've ever seen. It makes the TSX look so futuristic and er, passive aggressive? No, subtly aggressive. I love that front end, reinforces my belief that the TSX is the best looking current Acura IMO, even stock.
^that is one of the hottest TSXs I've ever seen. It makes the TSX look so futuristic and er, passive aggressive? No, subtly aggressive. I love that front end, reinforces my belief that the TSX is the best looking current Acura IMO, even stock.
#2689
#2692
There we go.... I knew I've seen it on the TSX, just couldn't remember what it was called. I'm not one of those JDM crazy kids but first thing I'd do if I got a TSX would be to put on the Euro Accord grille or the Module grille.
#2693
6 Forward 1 Back
And why can't you get Vortex Blue or Basque Red in the 4cyl manual transmission?
Damn Acura. You really want us to check out other brands don't you?
#2694
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
According to American Honda sales, as of October 2010:
MDX: 37,132
TL: 28,343
TSX: 25,094
RDX: 12,252
ZDX: 2,850
RL: 1,728
I have to say that IMHO the white Accord modulo posted above looks absolutely fantastic and very aggressive. Toss in a turbo 4, SH-AWD, and a 6MT, you would have a winner
#2695
Sorry not quite true.
According to American Honda sales, as of October 2010:
MDX: 37,132
TL: 28,343
TSX: 25,094
RDX: 12,252
ZDX: 2,850
RL: 1,728
I have to say that IMHO the white Accord modulo posted above looks absolutely fantastic and very aggressive. Toss in a turbo 4, SH-AWD, and a 6MT, you would have a winner
According to American Honda sales, as of October 2010:
MDX: 37,132
TL: 28,343
TSX: 25,094
RDX: 12,252
ZDX: 2,850
RL: 1,728
I have to say that IMHO the white Accord modulo posted above looks absolutely fantastic and very aggressive. Toss in a turbo 4, SH-AWD, and a 6MT, you would have a winner
The TL has been a big sales disappointment. You do realize that back with the 3G sales were doubled to triple of what they are now on the 4G! Some of that had to do with the economy but not all of it!
Below is what I was referring to. Sorry if I didn't make that clear in my original post!
Acura TSX Sales:
2004: 30,395
2005: 34,856 (+ 4461)
2006: 38,035 (+ 3719)
2007: 33,037 (- 4498)
2008: 31,998 (- 1039)
2009: 28,650 (- 3348)
2010: 25,094 (thru Oct)
Acura TL Sales:
2004: 77,895
2005: 78,218 (+ 323)
2006: 71,348 (- 6870)
2007: 58,545 (- 12,803)
2008: 48,766 (- 9779)
2009: 33,620 (-15,146)
2010: 28,343 (thru Oct)
For 2010, the TSX has had a +7.3% change in YTD where as the TL has only had a +0.6% change in YTD. What I'm saying basically is that the TSX is doing better then the TL in the grand scheme of things, especially now since 2010 was suppose to be out of the recession with the market trickling upward again. The TSX has much more positive growth and more stable (if you can even call it that) sales through the recession compared to the TL which fluctuated greatly.
Last edited by smarty666; 11-24-2010 at 05:29 PM.
#2696
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
Actually it is quite true! If you actually read what I posted, I said WITH the economy. I'm talking about percent change over its previous model years. As you can see below, the TSX does not have the huge huge decline that the TL has in sales.
The TL has been a big sales disappointment. You do realize that back with the 3G sales were doubled to triple of what they are now on the 4G! Some of that had to do with the economy but not all of it!
The TL has been a big sales disappointment. You do realize that back with the 3G sales were doubled to triple of what they are now on the 4G! Some of that had to do with the economy but not all of it!
What about the RDX then? +55.8% change in YTD. By your definition, the RDX would be Acura's best selling vehicle "with the economy."
I agree though (as a former 1G TSX owner) the TSX is doing comparatively better than the TL, for whatever reasons that may be.
#2697
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
Or another option would be for Acura to have that grill available as an aftermarket accessory. Why doesn't Acura offer as such?
#2698
#2699
fap fap fap
#2700
Actually it is quite true! If you actually read what I posted, I said WITH the economy. I'm talking about percent change over its previous model years. As you can see below, the TSX does not have the huge huge decline that the TL has in sales.
The TL has been a big sales disappointment. You do realize that back with the 3G sales were doubled to triple of what they are now on the 4G! Some of that had to do with the economy but not all of it!
Below is what I was referring to. Sorry if I didn't make that clear in my original post!
Acura TSX Sales:
2004: 30,395
2005: 34,856 (+ 4461)
2006: 38,035 (+ 3719)
2007: 33,037 (- 4498)
2008: 31,998 (- 1039)
2009: 28,650 (- 3348)
2010: 25,094 (thru Oct)
Acura TL Sales:
2004: 77,895
2005: 78,218 (+ 323)
2006: 71,348 (- 6870)
2007: 58,545 (- 12,803)
2008: 48,766 (- 9779)
2009: 33,620 (-15,146)
2010: 28,343 (thru Oct)
For 2010, the TSX has had a +7.3% change in YTD where as the TL has only had a +0.6% change in YTD. What I'm saying basically is that the TSX is doing better then the TL in the grand scheme of things, especially now since 2010 was suppose to be out of the recession with the market trickling upward again. The TSX has much more positive growth and more stable (if you can even call it that) sales through the recession compared to the TL which fluctuated greatly.
The TL has been a big sales disappointment. You do realize that back with the 3G sales were doubled to triple of what they are now on the 4G! Some of that had to do with the economy but not all of it!
Below is what I was referring to. Sorry if I didn't make that clear in my original post!
Acura TSX Sales:
2004: 30,395
2005: 34,856 (+ 4461)
2006: 38,035 (+ 3719)
2007: 33,037 (- 4498)
2008: 31,998 (- 1039)
2009: 28,650 (- 3348)
2010: 25,094 (thru Oct)
Acura TL Sales:
2004: 77,895
2005: 78,218 (+ 323)
2006: 71,348 (- 6870)
2007: 58,545 (- 12,803)
2008: 48,766 (- 9779)
2009: 33,620 (-15,146)
2010: 28,343 (thru Oct)
For 2010, the TSX has had a +7.3% change in YTD where as the TL has only had a +0.6% change in YTD. What I'm saying basically is that the TSX is doing better then the TL in the grand scheme of things, especially now since 2010 was suppose to be out of the recession with the market trickling upward again. The TSX has much more positive growth and more stable (if you can even call it that) sales through the recession compared to the TL which fluctuated greatly.
there is only two inch diffference in length/width with decreasing height but 2G TSX has 4 feet tighter turning circle. you can practically take U-turn with single hand at higher speed with 2G but you cant do it with 1G as it goes much wider the higher speeds goes.
4G TL has grown in size and upgraded interior by larger margin. 4G now compete with Infiniti M37/BMW 5/MB E/Audi A6. so you have to look at that market segment.
#2701
My first Avatar....
there is only two inch diffference in length/width with decreasing height but 2G TSX has 4 feet tighter turning circle. you can practically take U-turn with single hand at higher speed with 2G but you cant do it with 1G as it goes much wider the higher speeds goes.
You talk about the most bizarre things. Is the "turning circle" the new "side mirrors"?
#2702
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
Actually it is quite true! If you actually read what I posted, I said WITH the economy. I'm talking about percent change over its previous model years. As you can see below, the TSX does not have the huge huge decline that the TL has in sales.
The TL has been a big sales disappointment. You do realize that back with the 3G sales were doubled to triple of what they are now on the 4G! Some of that had to do with the economy but not all of it!
Below is what I was referring to. Sorry if I didn't make that clear in my original post!
Acura TSX Sales:
2004: 30,395
2005: 34,856 (+ 4461)
2006: 38,035 (+ 3719)
2007: 33,037 (- 4498)
2008: 31,998 (- 1039)
2009: 28,650 (- 3348)
2010: 25,094 (thru Oct)
Acura TL Sales:
2004: 77,895
2005: 78,218 (+ 323)
2006: 71,348 (- 6870)
2007: 58,545 (- 12,803)
2008: 48,766 (- 9779)
2009: 33,620 (-15,146)
2010: 28,343 (thru Oct)
For 2010, the TSX has had a +7.3% change in YTD where as the TL has only had a +0.6% change in YTD. What I'm saying basically is that the TSX is doing better then the TL in the grand scheme of things, especially now since 2010 was suppose to be out of the recession with the market trickling upward again. The TSX has much more positive growth and more stable (if you can even call it that) sales through the recession compared to the TL which fluctuated greatly.
The TL has been a big sales disappointment. You do realize that back with the 3G sales were doubled to triple of what they are now on the 4G! Some of that had to do with the economy but not all of it!
Below is what I was referring to. Sorry if I didn't make that clear in my original post!
Acura TSX Sales:
2004: 30,395
2005: 34,856 (+ 4461)
2006: 38,035 (+ 3719)
2007: 33,037 (- 4498)
2008: 31,998 (- 1039)
2009: 28,650 (- 3348)
2010: 25,094 (thru Oct)
Acura TL Sales:
2004: 77,895
2005: 78,218 (+ 323)
2006: 71,348 (- 6870)
2007: 58,545 (- 12,803)
2008: 48,766 (- 9779)
2009: 33,620 (-15,146)
2010: 28,343 (thru Oct)
For 2010, the TSX has had a +7.3% change in YTD where as the TL has only had a +0.6% change in YTD. What I'm saying basically is that the TSX is doing better then the TL in the grand scheme of things, especially now since 2010 was suppose to be out of the recession with the market trickling upward again. The TSX has much more positive growth and more stable (if you can even call it that) sales through the recession compared to the TL which fluctuated greatly.
#2703
I knew the 4G sales dropped, I didn't know it was THAT much.
#2704
אני עומד עם ישראל
^ That's cause it has moved upmarket, don't forget the economy too
#2705
Senior Moderator
#2706
You can make all excuses why the 4G TL sales are so much lower, the economy, polarizing styling, scariness in size, price increases, market competition, fact is the sales between the 3G and 4G have dropped tremendously. We are not talking a small sales drop like what happened with the TSX, we are talking major sales changes. Most of this has to do with the car itself.
As ShiftAcura pointed out earlier, the 2G TSX and MDX seemed to be a progressive (normal) evolution of their predecssors, while the 4G TL seems not to be a normal evolution of its 3G predecsseor.
Also, lets keep in mind, that the increase in price excuse really isn't that doable or logical considering that in 07 and 08 we had the type S and the TL ranged in price from $34k something for the base up to like $38-39k for the loaded type S.
The 4G TL is basically only a $1k difference in the base ($35k something) and about a $3k difference up to $41-42k for the fully loaded SH-AWD. That is not that much of a price increase to explain that much of a sales decline
As ShiftAcura pointed out earlier, the 2G TSX and MDX seemed to be a progressive (normal) evolution of their predecssors, while the 4G TL seems not to be a normal evolution of its 3G predecsseor.
Also, lets keep in mind, that the increase in price excuse really isn't that doable or logical considering that in 07 and 08 we had the type S and the TL ranged in price from $34k something for the base up to like $38-39k for the loaded type S.
The 4G TL is basically only a $1k difference in the base ($35k something) and about a $3k difference up to $41-42k for the fully loaded SH-AWD. That is not that much of a price increase to explain that much of a sales decline
#2707
I don't know why so many people are uptight with what I said. This is a TSX thread and I gave the TSX and its sales a compliment ?
#2708
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
You can make all excuses why the 4G TL sales are so much lower, the economy, polarizing styling, scariness in size, price increases, market competition, fact is the sales between the 3G and 4G have dropped tremendously. We are not talking a small sales drop like what happened with the TSX, we are talking major sales changes. Most of this has to do with the car itself.
As ShiftAcura pointed out earlier, the 2G TSX and MDX seemed to be a progressive (normal) evolution of their predecssors, while the 4G TL seems not to be a normal evolution of its 3G predecsseor.
Also, lets keep in mind, that the increase in price excuse really isn't that doable or logical considering that in 07 and 08 we had the type S and the TL ranged in price from $34k something for the base up to like $38-39k for the loaded type S.
The 4G TL is basically only a $1k difference in the base ($35k something) and about a $3k difference up to $41-42k for the fully loaded SH-AWD. That is not that much of a price increase to explain that much of a sales decline
As ShiftAcura pointed out earlier, the 2G TSX and MDX seemed to be a progressive (normal) evolution of their predecssors, while the 4G TL seems not to be a normal evolution of its 3G predecsseor.
Also, lets keep in mind, that the increase in price excuse really isn't that doable or logical considering that in 07 and 08 we had the type S and the TL ranged in price from $34k something for the base up to like $38-39k for the loaded type S.
The 4G TL is basically only a $1k difference in the base ($35k something) and about a $3k difference up to $41-42k for the fully loaded SH-AWD. That is not that much of a price increase to explain that much of a sales decline
Looking back at the facts,
2006: 71,348 (- 6870)
2007: 58,545 (- 12,803)
2008: 48,766 (- 9779)
2009: 33,620 (-15,146)
If I remember correctly, the economy was doing pretty good before 2008. Yet, look at the drop from 2006 to 2007, and damn, that's a huge drop for 2007 to 2008. The economy was still ok at that time. What happened there? Still the same 3G TL. In fact, Acura introduced the Type S variant too. That should theoretically increase sale. But boom, 7000 less one year, than 13000 less the next. Does that mean the 3G TL has problems? Can anyone explain what happened here? The only reason I can see is increased market competition.
#2709
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
Yeah, but the RDX does not sell any where near the numbers that the TSX sells each year. If you take into account the TSX total sales AND its percent change during the recession and now after, its doing really really well for Acura.
I don't know why so many people are uptight with what I said. This is a TSX thread and I gave the TSX and its sales a compliment ?
I don't know why so many people are uptight with what I said. This is a TSX thread and I gave the TSX and its sales a compliment ?
#2710
#2711
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
I would like to see something like this:
TSX I4: $29k
TSX V6: $33k
TSX V6 SH-AWD: $36k
+$3k for tech package for each. Make the TSX V6 sportier to differentiate itself from the TL FWD. Move the TL further up market.
TSX I4: $29k
TSX V6: $33k
TSX V6 SH-AWD: $36k
+$3k for tech package for each. Make the TSX V6 sportier to differentiate itself from the TL FWD. Move the TL further up market.
#2712
I think your going to have to wait till the 2014 model years to come out to see if indeed they both move upmarket as Acura as hinted at! They'll need something though to slot below the TSX.
#2713
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Not only that but they would have to move the RL really upmarket or cancel it all together to differentiate it from the TL.
#2714
For 2011 there is 2mpg improvement in fuel economy and more quierter ride. I would say TSX is now already the best in class for refinement when you compare it with BMW 3/Audi A4.
when you compare TSX/TL interior TSX is more simple and not overhelm with buttons
#2715
6G TLX-S
And up to where ? Tier-2, Tier-3, Tier-4 ?
Not after Honda has now decided to drop the goal of Acura going after the Tier-1 luxury brands. The new direction for Acura is now going SMART LUXURY - if only anyone knows what exactly that means.
#2716
Move Acura upmarket ? Why ? How ?
And up to where ? Tier-2, Tier-3, Tier-4 ?
Not after Honda has now decided to drop the goal of Acura going after the Tier-1 luxury brands. The new direction for Acura is now going SMART LUXURY - if only anyone knows what exactly that means.
And up to where ? Tier-2, Tier-3, Tier-4 ?
Not after Honda has now decided to drop the goal of Acura going after the Tier-1 luxury brands. The new direction for Acura is now going SMART LUXURY - if only anyone knows what exactly that means.
#2717
6G TLX-S
They are not moving up to tier 1, what I'm referring to is some links to Acura execs saying that their in the process currently of moving the sedan line-up up a step and that is why the 2G TSX and 4G TL grew so much in proportions and size. It was a while ago and I'll have to take a look through AZ to see if I can find the info I'm talking about.
It's just I wonder what's on Honda's mind, when Acura is not moving up to Tier-1, but it's product pricings are quickly approaching the true-Tier-1 product level. Doesn't Honda learn from the RL mistake ?
Last edited by Edward'TLS; 11-27-2010 at 08:49 AM.
#2718
My first Avatar....
As far as looks are concerned... the RL is far more pleasing than the TL. So, all they would have to do is put a 395hp/360lbft V8 in the RL, keep the AWD system, and boom....instant separation from the TL. But we all know where the Big Ack stands on the V8.
#2719
new entry = IS250, G25, 328, C300,
3G TSX = ES/IS350, G37, 330, A4, C350
5G TL = GS, 5, A6, E, M
3G RL = LS, 7, A8, S