Acura: RLX News
#1162
The sizzle in the Steak
Originally Posted by cob3683
#1165
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
A detuned version of the NSX's V10 would be more likely IMO.
#1167
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
i heard similar rumors back in 2000 when I got the CL-S. Dealer told me that he was "in the know" and that new RL was going to be introduced in 2004 with V8, RWD, and hybrid system to compete with the LS430 and S-class.
He also told me about the "AWESOME EXXON headlights" that the CL-S had. Needless to say I had no faith in those rumors.
I think there have been more than enough rumors of V8 or RWD from honda that it's beginning to sound like the boy who cried "wolf".
He also told me about the "AWESOME EXXON headlights" that the CL-S had. Needless to say I had no faith in those rumors.
I think there have been more than enough rumors of V8 or RWD from honda that it's beginning to sound like the boy who cried "wolf".
#1169
Photography Nerd
It's entirely possible that if they've been designing the V10 with the possibility of lopping 2 cylinders off for other models all along. A 500hp V10 would probably make a good 400hp V8 which would be a sweet engine in an RL.
#1170
Senior Moderator
Or, the next RL or whatever they decide to call it has a version of that V10. Either way I'm willing to bet there will be future Acura Sedan packing V8 or V10 power.
Problem is, there should already be one. :brokenrecord:
Problem is, there should already be one. :brokenrecord:
#1172
The sizzle in the Steak
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
i heard similar rumors back in 2000 when I got the CL-S. Dealer told me that he was "in the know" and that new RL was going to be introduced in 2004 with V8, RWD, and hybrid system to compete with the LS430 and S-class.
He also told me about the "AWESOME EXXON headlights" that the CL-S had. Needless to say I had no faith in those rumors.
I think there have been more than enough rumors of V8 or RWD from honda that it's beginning to sound like the boy who cried "wolf".
He also told me about the "AWESOME EXXON headlights" that the CL-S had. Needless to say I had no faith in those rumors.
I think there have been more than enough rumors of V8 or RWD from honda that it's beginning to sound like the boy who cried "wolf".
I got jipped!!
#1176
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
People in the 'know' thought that the supposed 1996 Legend would have a V8, RWD etc etc.
The problem as I see it, is this:
1) People like to talk out of their asses
2) Occasionally a prototype is made that actually has those promised features. Which creates endless speculation.
The problem as I see it, is this:
1) People like to talk out of their asses
2) Occasionally a prototype is made that actually has those promised features. Which creates endless speculation.
#1177
The sizzle in the Steak
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
You didn't hear about the Valdez option?
#1178
Originally Posted by TypeSAddict
I dunno....is it really easier from an engineering perspective to lop off two cylinders from a V10 than it is to add two cylinders to a V6?
#1179
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
I asked that same question in another thread and I don't think anyone was able to answer it.
If its a 90 degree V6 such as the Honda C series (Legend, 1st gen 3.2 TL, 1st gen RL, NSX) then yes.
If you have a 60 degree V6 (J series) then you have to deal with balancing issues.
Personally, I dont know why Honda is going with a V-10. A V-12 would be smoother and have fewer technical issues.
#1180
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Depends on the angle.
If its a 90 degree V6 such as the Honda C series (Legend, 1st gen 3.2 TL, 1st gen RL, NSX) then yes.
If you have a 60 degree V6 (J series) then you have to deal with balancing issues.
Personally, I dont know why Honda is going with a V-10. A V-12 would be smoother and have fewer technical issues.
If its a 90 degree V6 such as the Honda C series (Legend, 1st gen 3.2 TL, 1st gen RL, NSX) then yes.
If you have a 60 degree V6 (J series) then you have to deal with balancing issues.
Personally, I dont know why Honda is going with a V-10. A V-12 would be smoother and have fewer technical issues.
#1181
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Depends on the angle.
If its a 90 degree V6 such as the Honda C series (Legend, 1st gen 3.2 TL, 1st gen RL, NSX) then yes.
If its a 90 degree V6 such as the Honda C series (Legend, 1st gen 3.2 TL, 1st gen RL, NSX) then yes.
#1182
Instructor
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto_CA
Age: 47
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since Honda is so late with introducing a V8 engine, it needs to skip it and go directly to V10. Everybody has a V8, and some are moving to V10 and V12 configs.
The benefits of a V10 are that you can have a 300hp to 500 hp range. And that way Honda can take it easy for a while.
Acura MDX = 3.5L v6 @ 280 hp and 4.5L V10 @ 340
Acura RL = 3.5L v6 @ 290 and 4.5L V10 @ 340 and some damn torque.
The v10 with Displacement on Demand.
The benefits of a V10 are that you can have a 300hp to 500 hp range. And that way Honda can take it easy for a while.
Acura MDX = 3.5L v6 @ 280 hp and 4.5L V10 @ 340
Acura RL = 3.5L v6 @ 290 and 4.5L V10 @ 340 and some damn torque.
The v10 with Displacement on Demand.
#1183
Originally Posted by dozorca
4.5L V10 @ 340
4.5L V10 @ 340 and some damn torque.
The v10 with Displacement on Demand.
4.5L V10 @ 340 and some damn torque.
The v10 with Displacement on Demand.
#1184
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by dozorca
Since Honda is so late with introducing a V8 engine, it needs to skip it and go directly to V10. Everybody has a V8, and some are moving to V10 and V12 configs.
The benefits of a V10 are that you can have a 300hp to 500 hp range. And that way Honda can take it easy for a while.
Acura MDX = 3.5L v6 @ 280 hp and 4.5L V10 @ 340
Acura RL = 3.5L v6 @ 290 and 4.5L V10 @ 340 and some damn torque.
The v10 with Displacement on Demand.
The benefits of a V10 are that you can have a 300hp to 500 hp range. And that way Honda can take it easy for a while.
Acura MDX = 3.5L v6 @ 280 hp and 4.5L V10 @ 340
Acura RL = 3.5L v6 @ 290 and 4.5L V10 @ 340 and some damn torque.
The v10 with Displacement on Demand.
#1185
Race Director
Some sanity needs to prevail here - look at Honda history and the probable cost of a V8 or V10 (even after eating the develoment costs) and the outlook is not good.
The problem with the RL is not the lack of power.
Honda should keep on milking its "safety for everyone" and "greenest company" marketing schemes and bring out products that follow this mantra.
It's only in retrospect people will realize we are approaching a turning point - just as the Internet stock buble burst in 2001 and the housing market is about to burst now, the HP wars will burst fairly soon. Then, Honda will look like a genious with its moderately powered fuel efficient cars. This will become a bit more obvious when the new MY08 milage rules come into affect.
Just fix the exterior of the RL, give people choices when it comes to options and it will sell.
Just like Honda saw the error of its ways with the rear of the 03-05 Accord, they'll fix the RL exterior. The drivetrain and interior are fine.
The problem with the RL is not the lack of power.
Honda should keep on milking its "safety for everyone" and "greenest company" marketing schemes and bring out products that follow this mantra.
It's only in retrospect people will realize we are approaching a turning point - just as the Internet stock buble burst in 2001 and the housing market is about to burst now, the HP wars will burst fairly soon. Then, Honda will look like a genious with its moderately powered fuel efficient cars. This will become a bit more obvious when the new MY08 milage rules come into affect.
Just fix the exterior of the RL, give people choices when it comes to options and it will sell.
Just like Honda saw the error of its ways with the rear of the 03-05 Accord, they'll fix the RL exterior. The drivetrain and interior are fine.
Last edited by biker; 07-05-2006 at 09:16 PM.
#1187
Instructor
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto_CA
Age: 47
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
That would be weak considering the new Lexus LS V8 produces 370hp
And since it was a suggestion, I could have put down 999 hp. Would that be weak compared to Bugatti Veyron?
#1188
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I haven't heard anything about Honda developing a V8.
A detuned version of the NSX's V10 would be more likely IMO.
A detuned version of the NSX's V10 would be more likely IMO.
#1189
Instructor
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto_CA
Age: 47
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Considering that Honda can easily squeeze 100 hp/L out of the motor, no reason a 4.5L Honda V8 should have less than 400 hp and 450hp should be obtainable.
I think a V10 with 400 hp will be less strained then a V8 with 400 hp.
But that wasn't my point, as I mentioned in the post above. My point was that for the flagship car(s), Acura/Honda needs to do something more to be a player in the game.
#1190
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Guys, guys, I cant believe you dont remember that I have posted in the past that it is confirmed that Honda is developing a V8 for the Ridgeline, the RL and possibly other vehicles.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=314309
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=314309
#1191
Originally Posted by gavriil
Guys, guys, I cant believe you dont remember that I have posted in the past that it is confirmed that Honda is developing a V8 for the Ridgeline, the RL and possibly other vehicles.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=314309
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=314309
:ibsomeonefindsapostfrommeinthere:
#1192
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by biker
Honda should keep on milking its "safety for everyone" and "greenest company" marketing schemes and bring out products that follow this mantra.
It's only in retrospect people will realize we are approaching a turning point - just as the Internet stock buble burst in 2001 and the housing market is about to burst now, the HP wars will burst fairly soon. Then, Honda will look like a genious with its moderately powered fuel efficient cars. This will become a bit more obvious when the new MY08 milage rules come into affect.
I don't think so...I think Honda will be ignored and Toyota will get a lot more credit for being "green".
#1194
Race Director
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
I don't think so...I think Honda will be ignored and Toyota will get a lot more credit for being "green".
#1195
Senior Moderator
Skeptism in the face of fact.
Fact: Honda has confirmed V10 development and likely V8 development as well.
I don't understand the skeptism on this. The RWD skeptism I can understand.
Fact: Honda has confirmed V10 development and likely V8 development as well.
I don't understand the skeptism on this. The RWD skeptism I can understand.
#1196
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by dom
I don't understand the skeptism on this. The RWD skeptism I can understand.
I'm actually less skeptic about RWD since the NSX and S2000 were/are RWD... but it does appear that Acura is going the SH-awd route...
#1197
Fahrvergnügen'd
Originally Posted by biker
Some sanity needs to prevail here - look at Honda history and the probable cost of a V8 or V10 (even after eating the develoment costs) and the outlook is not good.
The problem with the RL is not the lack of power.
Honda should keep on milking its "safety for everyone" and "greenest company" marketing schemes and bring out products that follow this mantra.
It's only in retrospect people will realize we are approaching a turning point - just as the Internet stock buble burst in 2001 and the housing market is about to burst now, the HP wars will burst fairly soon. Then, Honda will look like a genious with its moderately powered fuel efficient cars. This will become a bit more obvious when the new MY08 milage rules come into affect.
Just fix the exterior of the RL, give people choices when it comes to options and it will sell.
Just like Honda saw the error of its ways with the rear of the 03-05 Accord, they'll fix the RL exterior. The drivetrain and interior are fine.
The problem with the RL is not the lack of power.
Honda should keep on milking its "safety for everyone" and "greenest company" marketing schemes and bring out products that follow this mantra.
It's only in retrospect people will realize we are approaching a turning point - just as the Internet stock buble burst in 2001 and the housing market is about to burst now, the HP wars will burst fairly soon. Then, Honda will look like a genious with its moderately powered fuel efficient cars. This will become a bit more obvious when the new MY08 milage rules come into affect.
Just fix the exterior of the RL, give people choices when it comes to options and it will sell.
Just like Honda saw the error of its ways with the rear of the 03-05 Accord, they'll fix the RL exterior. The drivetrain and interior are fine.
#1198
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by charliemike
Honda supplies every V-10 for the Indy cars ... They have the engine already
And using that logic suggests Honda should have had V8's in their car's for years since they've been and were supplying V8's to Indycar and Champ car since the early to mid 90's.
#1199
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by dom
Skeptism in the face of fact.
Fact: Honda has confirmed V10 development and likely V8 development as well.
I don't understand the skeptism on this. The RWD skeptism I can understand.
Fact: Honda has confirmed V10 development and likely V8 development as well.
I don't understand the skeptism on this. The RWD skeptism I can understand.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...ghlight=legend
#1200
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by phile
Wow, I don't remember seeing that thread.
:ibsomeonefindsapostfrommeinthere:
:ibsomeonefindsapostfrommeinthere: