When do you think the next gen TL (TLX) will be released?
#1041
barely... just voicing an opinion just like you. it is a forum after all, a place for discussion.. doesnt mean im offended by your comment. and some of us think that the tl is an attractive car too. i bet you think the beak on your 09 is badass.
#1042
Nope. It's fugly.
3G TL was Acura's best IMHO (so far).
3G TL was Acura's best IMHO (so far).
#1044
I wanted S2000, wife wanted big enough ride to haul family and friends (such as X5, Cayenne). We got a 4G TL as loaner and both agreed this would satisfy needs. Grille was the only thing I didn't like. I wanted to add the RJ Grille, but they would not work with me on the mesh. She now drives the car the majority of the time, and I gave up on changing the beak.
#1045
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
2013 is the last year of the ZDX.
I found the ZDX impractical compared to the MDX, it's just too much of a niche market. Its competition is limited to the BMW X6, a similar impractical vehicle, which I also find "fugly" and near "turtle hunchback like." Yet BMW sold 43,000 X6s in 2012..
I found the ZDX impractical compared to the MDX, it's just too much of a niche market. Its competition is limited to the BMW X6, a similar impractical vehicle, which I also find "fugly" and near "turtle hunchback like." Yet BMW sold 43,000 X6s in 2012..
#1046
ahhh, the x6. a car that i also love. i like it more than the zdx but too expensive... both to purchase and maintain. i guess im just weird that i like weird looking cars. lol
#1047
Pro
I know we are still off track but I admired the ZDX at least for its originality and daring (at least for Honda/Acura). I think it looks good from several angles and really only needed maybe a little bit of tweaking to look better. Characteristic of Acura to introduce a vehicle to much hoopla and then kill it off after a couple of years.
#1048
I know we are still off track but I admired the ZDX at least for its originality and daring (at least for Honda/Acura). I think it looks good from several angles and really only needed maybe a little bit of tweaking to look better. Characteristic of Acura to introduce a vehicle to much hoopla and then kill it off after a couple of years.
#1049
it may look expensive but you do get all the bells and whistles. a 3 series or c class with all the same options can also run roughly the same price. and id pick the zdx over both cars
#1050
Burning Brakes
I'd rather have a 3 series. As the poster above said, I'm not into status, I would pick a 3 series over a TL, ZDX or G37 all else being equal. But as we know, things are rarely equal.
#1051
Once my current lease runs out on my 13 SH-AWD TL and if I'm not pleased with the 5 GEN TL or if they price it out of my range I will consider a used ZDX. I'm not an SUV person at all but a cross-over I may buy. However, they made the Honda version of the ZDX (crosstour) as ugly as they could!
#1052
#1054
Pro
Integra, Legend, CL, Vigor--maybe sometimes more than a couple of years but they seem to go through name changes and model dropping more than most marques. At least compared to the marques they want to be competing with.
#1055
Integra = 1986 to 2000 = 14 years
Legend = 1986 to 1995 = 9 years
CL = 1997 = 2003 = 6 years (7 if you consider that the '97 came out in 3/96)
IMO, the only one close was the Vigor which only had three model years but was sold for 4 since it came out very early in 1991 as a 1992.
#1056
Pro
More to the point Colin is that obviously the upper tier Asian models want to be compared to the Germans. Part of what the Germans have going for them is extreme commitment to model names and identities. Even Lexus caught on pretty quickly that you need to pick your models and stick with them (not so much Infiniti).
You have a pretty good level of confidence that 15 years from now you will still be talking about the then-current 3-series, 5-series, etc. and ditto with the Mercedes C-class, E-class, etc.
In 3 years I wonder if we will still be seeing an ILX or TLX or RLX or if there will be yet another name change/model drop.
You have a pretty good level of confidence that 15 years from now you will still be talking about the then-current 3-series, 5-series, etc. and ditto with the Mercedes C-class, E-class, etc.
In 3 years I wonder if we will still be seeing an ILX or TLX or RLX or if there will be yet another name change/model drop.
#1057
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
More to the point Colin is that obviously the upper tier Asian models want to be compared to the Germans. Part of what the Germans have going for them is extreme commitment to model names and identities. Even Lexus caught on pretty quickly that you need to pick your models and stick with them (not so much Infiniti).
You have a pretty good level of confidence that 15 years from now you will still be talking about the then-current 3-series, 5-series, etc. and ditto with the Mercedes C-class, E-class, etc.
In 3 years I wonder if we will still be seeing an ILX or TLX or RLX or if there will be yet another name change/model drop.
You have a pretty good level of confidence that 15 years from now you will still be talking about the then-current 3-series, 5-series, etc. and ditto with the Mercedes C-class, E-class, etc.
In 3 years I wonder if we will still be seeing an ILX or TLX or RLX or if there will be yet another name change/model drop.
Ie: The Porsche 911 is iconic; Porsche has not changed the "911" nomenclature since its introduction, and its name is synonymous with "luxury sports car" and the Porsche brad. Same goes for toys, like character"Optimus Prime." Can you imagine the confusion if the 911 was suddenly renamed to 912? Or if Optimus Prime is known as Optimal Prime? Uproar!!!
However, BMW has now also started to add names a la Audi's nomenclature. 2 series, 4 series... I'm not so sure that is a good idea. My 2
#1058
Acura has made one (brand-wide) change to the naming conventions in their 25+ year history. The RL has been the RL longer than the Legend nameplate existed. Yes it's been a 3.5 RL, RL and now RLX, but is that too confusing for consumers? Is the 320, 318, 328, 330 or a 240Z, 260Z, 280ZX that different?
Anyway, I didn't mean to jump all over you. This thread has been distracted far too much and I apologize for contributing to it. My bad.
Last edited by Colin; 08-22-2013 at 06:22 PM.
#1059
i agree. no reason to call the new tl a tlx. especially since the tl has had 4 generations already. i was surprised with infinitis move to change the names of their line up. instead of focusing on the name, focus on how to improve the vehicle itself. as long as the vehicle looks nice and reliable, who cares what they name it.
#1060
Chief Excellence Liason
They did that in the mid/late 90s when Transformers started the Beast Wars series. Optimus Prime took the form of a gorilla instead of a fire truck, and I think they referred to him as "Optimus Primal" on multiple occasions
#1061
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
LOL, I remember that, a gorilla of all things! Atrocious!
#1062
Burning Brakes
I agree with this post. Names should stick and not change. People don't like change, and familiarity breeds longevity, and with longevity it enhances and adds to prolonged name recognition. IMHO.
Ie: The Porsche 911 is iconic; Porsche has not changed the "911" nomenclature since its introduction, and its name is synonymous with "luxury sports car" and the Porsche brad. Same goes for toys, like character"Optimus Prime." Can you imagine the confusion if the 911 was suddenly renamed to 912? Or if Optimus Prime is known as Optimal Prime? Uproar!!!
However, BMW has now also started to add names a la Audi's nomenclature. 2 series, 4 series... I'm not so sure that is a good idea. My 2
Ie: The Porsche 911 is iconic; Porsche has not changed the "911" nomenclature since its introduction, and its name is synonymous with "luxury sports car" and the Porsche brad. Same goes for toys, like character"Optimus Prime." Can you imagine the confusion if the 911 was suddenly renamed to 912? Or if Optimus Prime is known as Optimal Prime? Uproar!!!
However, BMW has now also started to add names a la Audi's nomenclature. 2 series, 4 series... I'm not so sure that is a good idea. My 2
#1063
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
What size engine is in the 911? 9.11 liter? I can see why Infiniti changed their naming convention to get away from engine sizes in the name of the car. TL? What size engine can you deduce from the name? As far as BMW changing the names, their sales don't seem to be suffering for it.
#1064
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
What size engine is in the 911? 9.11 liter? I can see why Infiniti changed their naming convention to get away from engine sizes in the name of the car. TL? What size engine can you deduce from the name? As far as BMW changing the names, their sales don't seem to be suffering for it.
BMW's 2 and 4 series, like BearAVHistory said, are coupe variants of the 1 and 3 series. The 2 and 4 series are not even for sale yet, at least at my local dealership, so how can you tell if sales haven't suffered from it? Besides, the 1 series (a new model) and 3 series name (a perennial high seller) still remain unchanged (3, 5, 7 series have remained 3, 5, 7 series for as long as I've known of BMW's cars).
#1065
Pro
i agree. no reason to call the new tl a tlx. especially since the tl has had 4 generations already. i was surprised with infinitis move to change the names of their line up. instead of focusing on the name, focus on how to improve the vehicle itself. as long as the vehicle looks nice and reliable, who cares what they name it.
#1066
There is Acura heritage in "X" from the NSX (and RSX, TSX, RDX and MDX) so why not use it? Anyway, I'm in sales and I don't care what they call it so long as its a good car. I don't worry about the name (it is still TL afterall), if it's good enough, people will figure it out.
#1067
The TL might have been TLX way back in 1998.
The following users liked this post:
Ruby (09-12-2013)
#1068
Burning Brakes
I believe Honda used the "X" to refer to its concept cars. The "X" stood for eXperimental. The NS-X (New Sportscar eXperimental), which was originally called the HP-X (Honda Pininfarina eXperimental) was the first to use this as its prototype. So there is some background or "heritage" to this. I just googled it.
#1069
Pro
I believe Honda used the "X" to refer to its concept cars. The "X" stood for eXperimental. The NS-X (New Sportscar eXperimental), which was originally called the HP-X (Honda Pininfarina eXperimental) was the first to use this as its prototype. So there is some background or "heritage" to this. I just googled it.
#1070
Burning Brakes
Well we don't know that though. They could call it Type-R or Type-S again and I think they will. It makes sense for them since they've used it in the past. Or they could name it TLX-R or TLX-S. Type-R sounds badass though. Brings back memories of the Integra Type-R.
#1071
#1072
Unlike previous generations where the TL was an acronym for "Transmission Loser", the current generation TL, "Touring Luxury", can only be succeeded by the acronym TLA: "I Want a J engine but I don't want yet another boring Accord". Too many letters, eh?
#1073
I was selling when the CLX was a concept (1995).
I was also selling when Acura decided to kill off the Vigor, the Legend, and the Integra. During that transition it was clear (and stated) that the direction was to compete with the other Japanese luxury brands who had already established that approach (LS, GS, ES, SC, Q, M, J, G, etc).
I was also selling when Acura decided to kill off the Vigor, the Legend, and the Integra. During that transition it was clear (and stated) that the direction was to compete with the other Japanese luxury brands who had already established that approach (LS, GS, ES, SC, Q, M, J, G, etc).
Last edited by MtnMan; 08-24-2013 at 08:27 AM.
#1074
Pro
I was also selling when Acura decided to kill off the Vigor, the Legend, and the Integra. During that transition it was clear (and stated) that the direction was to compete with the other Japanese luxury brands who had already established that approach (LS, GS, ES, SC, Q, M, J, G, etc).
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-24-2013)
#1075
MtnMan....That was an ugly concept IMO. I know many here will say that the CL was a good looking car but that is likely my most dislike model by Acura.
#1076
6G TLX-S
^^^^^
x2.
x2.
#1078
Agreed - the CL/CLX is also my least liked Acura, and they should stick with a naming convention!
I wanted to provide context that the "X" was established a long time ago, as well as confirm a previous poster's comment about its relation to concept models.
When are getting more spy shots?
I wanted to provide context that the "X" was established a long time ago, as well as confirm a previous poster's comment about its relation to concept models.
When are getting more spy shots?
#1079
^^ I can't wait to see more spy shots too! I am getting a little ansy....I suspect that between now and the end of September, we will see more spy shots, and not the one with the heavy padding but the one with the funky pattern. At least that is my hope...
#1080
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
We have serious plans to introduce an ABS vacuum formed splitter kit on the TLX sedan and coupe. It will be similar to this concept we designed for the 4G TL that never made it:
Pricing and ease of installation will be very competitive, it will not require finishing, but will be a matte graphite color, ready to install right out of the box with included hardware and instructions in the comfort of your own garage.
Pricing and ease of installation will be very competitive, it will not require finishing, but will be a matte graphite color, ready to install right out of the box with included hardware and instructions in the comfort of your own garage.