TLX in the wild... and new pics
#361
Suzuka Master
This is off topic, but the article was an interesting read so I'm sharing...
Japan's premium motor brands, Lexus, Acura and Infiniti, remain far behind their German rivals.
http://www.economist.com/news/busine...mitstoinfiniti
Japan's premium motor brands, Lexus, Acura and Infiniti, remain far behind their German rivals.
http://www.economist.com/news/busine...mitstoinfiniti
#362
Suzuka Master
Yeah, no chance... The mdx doesn't even have LED brake lights anymore. Neither does the ilx or rdx and the zdx never had them. The "flagship" rlx even has incandescent front and rear turn signals. This doesn't give the brand an image of technological advancement imo.
The following 3 users liked this post by KeithL:
#363
Racer
What, the new MDX does not have LED brake lights? How stupid is that. Honestly for a company that touts safety to leave off LED brake lights is damn stupid. There have been some articles that talk about the fraction of a second quicker the light is lit and that helps in someone behind you noticing you stopping quicker.
#364
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
That is correct and they've had how long to enter additional markets? Furthermore Infiniti and Lexus have plans to continue expansion.... Not sure about Acura.
#365
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
What, the new MDX does not have LED brake lights? How stupid is that. Honestly for a company that touts safety to leave off LED brake lights is damn stupid. There have been some articles that talk about the fraction of a second quicker the light is lit and that helps in someone behind you noticing you stopping quicker.
#366
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Freshly posted by someone to instagram...
#368
Racer
It just looks so plain, the whole car just doesn't do anything to me and I have been a Acura/Honda for the past 20 years. I know it could drive reallly nice and have a great pickup but I still want a car that I love to look at. It looks like its balls were chopped off.
The following users liked this post:
Timmy18 (06-08-2014)
#369
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
#370
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
#372
Drifting
#374
Three Wheelin'
This should have been a design language continued across the cars the lineup.
#375
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Hopefully the ones on the TLX will be closer to the RLX system.
#376
I don't see much luxury here. This looks too much like Honda instead of an Acura. They have regressed somewhat the more I see this car. I will wait til I see it in person before I totally write it off and buy a used ZDX instead. I currently have a 2013 SH-AWD TL.
#378
Senior Moderator
I just can't comprehend how they gave the go ahead for those base wheels. Shouldn't the TLX start where the Accord sport leaves off? With 18's at a minimum? And if they had to go with 17's, were there no nice looking 17's available?
The following 4 users liked this post by dom:
#379
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
I don't even want to go there so I'll just say... yes, I agree with you... and leave it at that.
#381
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
Lots of cars out there that are more exciting. Upcoming Lexus RCF, Porsche 997 and Macan, and upcoming 2015 Audi S5 are on my radar.
#382
Three Wheelin'
While it is a 4-hour drive from Atlanta, the sales service I've gotten from my rep there has been great, so I decided to take my business there again when it came time to lease my RLX and my wife's ILX.
#383
Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 9-2014
I'm just about done with the TLX; I can wait until the TLX is released before giving the TLX my final say, and when my next car itch starts itching aggressively.
Lots of cars out there that are more exciting. Upcoming Lexus RCF, Porsche 997 and Macan, and upcoming 2015 Audi S5 are on my radar.
Lots of cars out there that are more exciting. Upcoming Lexus RCF, Porsche 997 and Macan, and upcoming 2015 Audi S5 are on my radar.
I am at the point of just ignoring these random posted pictures, I have seen ones I like, video I like and ones I am not crazy about, until I see this in person not going to judge this car. What is clear to me is that the front end I am going to like in person it is hella better then the current TL and the wheels need help.... I also am positive it will look at lot better in person, as is the case with most Honda's. Acura get this freakin' thing at dealerships so I can see it and get this teasing done with.
The following 5 users liked this post by brutustlx:
a35tl (06-09-2014),
Gen4MDX (06-09-2014),
holografique (06-09-2014),
ReLaX (06-10-2014),
Rocket_man (06-09-2014)
#384
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
Seriously? What are you talking about. If you are looking at those cars why are you even thinking TLX, completely different ballpark. Kills me when people compare cars that have no relevance to each other beyond 4 wheels.
I am at the point of just ignoring these random posted pictures, I have seen ones I like, video I like and ones I am not crazy about, until I see this in person not going to judge this car. What is clear to me is that the front end I am going to like in person it is hella better then the current TL and the wheels need help.... I also am positive it will look at lot better in person, as is the case with most Honda's. Acura get this freakin' thing at dealerships so I can see it and get this teasing done with.
I am at the point of just ignoring these random posted pictures, I have seen ones I like, video I like and ones I am not crazy about, until I see this in person not going to judge this car. What is clear to me is that the front end I am going to like in person it is hella better then the current TL and the wheels need help.... I also am positive it will look at lot better in person, as is the case with most Honda's. Acura get this freakin' thing at dealerships so I can see it and get this teasing done with.
The relevance continues in that Acura no longer has a performance model that holds my interest (so far at least it appears with current released details about the TLX anyways, while the new NSX's info are nowhere to be found) and that my car interests are being swayed elsewhere.
Consider too that the rumored TLX SH-AWD Advance is near $50k with no "Tier 1" brand cachet (and likely more monies if one has to get a body kit/new rims to get it decent looking), I and along with other current owners who have gotten older and may likely have more disposable income, our eyes wonder at what other vehicles can be had for that price, and ones that are more exciting visually and dynamically behind the wheel. With vehicles like the S5, Macan S, and 997 that can be had for mid to high $50k, suddenly the bland looking TLX with unknown driving dynamics and unknown transmission reliability is not looking too good.
At over $50k MSRP, I no longer see the value of Acura's sedans and have expanded my horizons to other makes.
#385
God...I am struggling too!! I can't seem to see any good pics of the TLX that makes me want one (except the prototype). I need to see some leaks of the bodykit that I can at least trying to get excited.
The following users liked this post:
dwest1023 (08-01-2014)
#386
Midnight Marauder
just as an example, the value prop between the TLX and a Touring Trim Accord V6 is getting smaller.
#387
Three Wheelin'
The relevance here is that I'm a Honda/Acura fan and supporter; I had an Accord, Integra, 1G TSX, and now 4G TL 6MT.
The relevance continues in that Acura no longer has a performance model that holds my interest (so far at least it appears with current released details about the TLX anyways, while the new NSX's info are nowhere to be found) and that my car interests are being swayed elsewhere.
Consider too that the rumored TLX SH-AWD Advance is near $50k with no "Tier 1" brand cachet (and likely more monies if one has to get a body kit/new rims to get it decent looking), I and along with other current owners who have gotten older and may likely have more disposable income, our eyes wonder at what other vehicles can be had for that price, and ones that are more exciting visually and dynamically behind the wheel. With vehicles like the S5, Macan S, and 997 that can be had for mid to high $50k, suddenly the bland looking TLX with unknown driving dynamics and unknown transmission reliability is not looking too good.
At over $50k MSRP, I no longer see the value of Acura's sedans and have expanded my horizons to other makes.
The relevance continues in that Acura no longer has a performance model that holds my interest (so far at least it appears with current released details about the TLX anyways, while the new NSX's info are nowhere to be found) and that my car interests are being swayed elsewhere.
Consider too that the rumored TLX SH-AWD Advance is near $50k with no "Tier 1" brand cachet (and likely more monies if one has to get a body kit/new rims to get it decent looking), I and along with other current owners who have gotten older and may likely have more disposable income, our eyes wonder at what other vehicles can be had for that price, and ones that are more exciting visually and dynamically behind the wheel. With vehicles like the S5, Macan S, and 997 that can be had for mid to high $50k, suddenly the bland looking TLX with unknown driving dynamics and unknown transmission reliability is not looking too good.
At over $50k MSRP, I no longer see the value of Acura's sedans and have expanded my horizons to other makes.
How long is it going to take for people on this forum to realize that the TLX is a move by Acura to regain their mass revenue stream? It's called Business-101 folks. When a company goes through revenue loss like Acura has over the past few years, that is not the time to go spending and investing into niche products that are purchased by the minority, not the majority. That goes for ANY company, not just car companies. Now could have Acura possibly done a better job with their attempt to recapture the success of the 3G TL? Not a single one of us can tell until this car is out there and selling.
With the loss in sales over the TL, the economy, the tsunami, AND their poor decisions on other fronts, Acura cannot afford to invest into nichey sport vehicles like an S5, Lexus RCF, etc. etc. If Acura recovers and see's gains from the TLX, then I'm sure at that point there will be less financial risk for them to start focusing back on variants and sport options that cater to the MINORITY ENTHUSIASTS.
Last edited by holografique; 06-09-2014 at 06:14 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by holografique:
a35tl (06-09-2014),
Gen4MDX (06-09-2014),
J.A.S. (06-10-2014),
mr2core (06-09-2014),
Rocket_man (06-09-2014)
#388
Suzuka Master
I still think Acura provides value. Yes it is getting squeezed, but honestly for $50K you would be hard pressed to find a lot of competitors. The real squeeze is from Hyundai when you can get a 15 Genesis loaded with AWD For $52K that has a few more features than Acura. The Germans are still substantially more apples to apples.
The following users liked this post:
holografique (06-09-2014)
#389
Three Wheelin'
At over $50k MSRP, I no longer see the value of Acura's sedans and have expanded my horizons to other makes.
The Equus and the K900 are bringing on some fierce competition.
#391
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Instagram...
The following 4 users liked this post by randomRon82:
Acura_Girl_Forever (06-19-2014),
bg905 (06-10-2014),
MuGen7Modulo (06-09-2014),
ostrich (06-10-2014)
#393
Senior Moderator
And not a single one of those vehicles you listed is a mass selling vehicle that is created to generate large amounts of revenue. They are created to cater to the enthusiasts and give their customer base more unique options than the existing base product. A base product that generates the majority of the sales.
How long is it going to take for people on this forum to realize that the TLX is a move by Acura to regain their mass revenue stream? It's called Business-101 folks. When a company goes through revenue loss like Acura has over the past few years, that is not the time to go spending and investing into niche products that are purchased by the minority, not the majority. That goes for ANY company, not just car companies. Now could have Acura possibly done a better job with their attempt to recapture the success of the 3G TL? Not a single one of us can tell until this car is out there and selling.
With the loss in sales over the TL, the economy, the tsunami, AND their poor decisions on other fronts, Acura cannot afford to invest into nichey sport vehicles like an S5, Lexus RCF, etc. etc. If Acura recovers and see's gains from the TLX, then I'm sure at that point there will be less financial risk for them to start focusing back on variants and sport options that cater to the MINORITY ENTHUSIASTS.
How long is it going to take for people on this forum to realize that the TLX is a move by Acura to regain their mass revenue stream? It's called Business-101 folks. When a company goes through revenue loss like Acura has over the past few years, that is not the time to go spending and investing into niche products that are purchased by the minority, not the majority. That goes for ANY company, not just car companies. Now could have Acura possibly done a better job with their attempt to recapture the success of the 3G TL? Not a single one of us can tell until this car is out there and selling.
With the loss in sales over the TL, the economy, the tsunami, AND their poor decisions on other fronts, Acura cannot afford to invest into nichey sport vehicles like an S5, Lexus RCF, etc. etc. If Acura recovers and see's gains from the TLX, then I'm sure at that point there will be less financial risk for them to start focusing back on variants and sport options that cater to the MINORITY ENTHUSIASTS.
#394
It is not just the design but fit/finish does not look like Japanese built quality. large front overhangs, thin frontal area. Practically no presence for TLX. its a design down grade to achieve greater fuel economic.
#395
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
And not a single one of those vehicles you listed is a mass selling vehicle that is created to generate large amounts of revenue. They are created to cater to the enthusiasts and give their customer base more unique options than the existing base product. A base product that generates the majority of the sales.
How long is it going to take for people on this forum to realize that the TLX is a move by Acura to regain their mass revenue stream? It's called Business-101 folks. When a company goes through revenue loss like Acura has over the past few years, that is not the time to go spending and investing into niche products that are purchased by the minority, not the majority. That goes for ANY company, not just car companies. Now could have Acura possibly done a better job with their attempt to recapture the success of the 3G TL? Not a single one of us can tell until this car is out there and selling.
With the loss in sales over the TL, the economy, the tsunami, AND their poor decisions on other fronts, Acura cannot afford to invest into nichey sport vehicles like an S5, Lexus RCF, etc. etc. If Acura recovers and see's gains from the TLX, then I'm sure at that point there will be less financial risk for them to start focusing back on variants and sport options that cater to the MINORITY ENTHUSIASTS.
How long is it going to take for people on this forum to realize that the TLX is a move by Acura to regain their mass revenue stream? It's called Business-101 folks. When a company goes through revenue loss like Acura has over the past few years, that is not the time to go spending and investing into niche products that are purchased by the minority, not the majority. That goes for ANY company, not just car companies. Now could have Acura possibly done a better job with their attempt to recapture the success of the 3G TL? Not a single one of us can tell until this car is out there and selling.
With the loss in sales over the TL, the economy, the tsunami, AND their poor decisions on other fronts, Acura cannot afford to invest into nichey sport vehicles like an S5, Lexus RCF, etc. etc. If Acura recovers and see's gains from the TLX, then I'm sure at that point there will be less financial risk for them to start focusing back on variants and sport options that cater to the MINORITY ENTHUSIASTS.
I myself consider myself an "enthusiast" and given that this is Acurazine "the unofficial Acura enthusiast resource," one would suspect members of this enthusiast forum would gripe about an "unethusiastic" vehicle.
Acura HAD a nice sporty/enthusiast vehicle when it had the Integra, 3G TL type S, and the 4G TL 6MT, with the latter two variants of the maintstream model. Who knows, maybe Acura as you mentioned will release sporty variants later on if the TLX is successful; but so far the TLX IMHO doesn't have esthetic or sporty traits I find desirable. The prototype was a great start, and then it got castrated.
I agree, Acura has to cater to the MASSES. Such is the case with the redesigned RDX, which is seeing record sales. MDX and RDX are selling well, while the ZDX got axed. But the ILX and RLX, clearly not sporty vehicles, are not selling well and aren't they catering to the masses? If Acura's current sedans ILX and RLX are not doing well, what makes one think the TLX will sell well?
So... something has to stand out with the TLX and allow the TLX to distinguish itself; as of now, I see Acura as playing catch up and nothing about the TLX stands out to me. Again, the TLX's prototype design was a great start, but now it's gone. Hence as I've stated before, the TLX better dam well have near perfect driving dynamics for it to have any chance at being successful.... Unless of course Acura comes up with another excuse.
#396
Pro
How shrewd of Acura to have discovered the 2 things that potential buyers want in the new design--a letter added to the model name and more headlights.
I guess if sales don't go the way they expect they can always add a few more headlights. Why stop at 10 when you can have 12 or 14?
I guess if sales don't go the way they expect they can always add a few more headlights. Why stop at 10 when you can have 12 or 14?
#398
Drifting
In those photos and that trim, it really is disappointly "bland" looking. I do agree that somethings look much better in the "flesh" than in their photos. I am certainly hopping that is the case here. I still remain hopeful. The real thing, in the right color and trim package may put a lot of us at ease.
The following users liked this post:
a77 (06-19-2014)
#399
Three Wheelin'
The success of the 3G TL in its masses was not design, but much more likely to be a perfect balance of price, value, the economy, and overall buye sentiment.
You seem to take every aspect of Acura's success and attribute it to design. And while I agree that design is critical to capturing the emotion of a potential new buyer....MOST car buyers dont buy for that reason, they buy for value. We the enthusiasts buy on emotion, and what makes us feel passionate about a car and that is more based on design and looks. But again, we are the minority.
To say the RLX/ILX are bland is opinion and one that I dont think is the cause of the sales issue for the reasons I've already stated. I think the ILX is a hot looking car. To me its the evolution of the Integra. And Ive already stated what I think of the RLX.
Last edited by holografique; 06-10-2014 at 07:10 AM.
#400
Senior Moderator
It's been discussed numerous times already that the RLX hasnt done well likely to its poor marketing and high price. I believe the ILX is the same situation, and further impacted by the fact that it does not have enough substantial luxury features for the price it commands to really entice a buyer to justify the added cost over going with a Honda. If the ILX offered real leather seats, a larger steering wheel, TPS, memory seats, better suspension, and better cabin noise reduction, all of which are already available in its bigger sister cars, I think the ILX would sell alot more. The biggest problem being it just doesn't "feel" luxury enough. It "feels" like a Honda, more like a Civic, yet still commands a price of which you could pay for an entry level C-Class. All going back to Acura's value prop loosing its effect in the market place due to heightened competition.
The success of the 3G TL in its masses was not design, but much more likely to be a perfect balance of price, value, the economy, and overall buye sentiment.
You seem to take every aspect of Acura's success and attribute it to design. And while I agree that design is critical to capturing the emotion of a potential new buyer....MOST car buyers dont buy for that reason, they buy for value. We the enthusiasts buy on emotion, and what makes us feel passionate about a car and that is more based on design and looks. But again, we are the minority.
To say the RLX/ILX are bland is opinion and one that I dont think is the cause of the sales issue for the reasons I've already stated. I think the ILX is a hot looking car. To me its the evolution of the Integra. And Ive already stated what I think of the RLX.
The success of the 3G TL in its masses was not design, but much more likely to be a perfect balance of price, value, the economy, and overall buye sentiment.
You seem to take every aspect of Acura's success and attribute it to design. And while I agree that design is critical to capturing the emotion of a potential new buyer....MOST car buyers dont buy for that reason, they buy for value. We the enthusiasts buy on emotion, and what makes us feel passionate about a car and that is more based on design and looks. But again, we are the minority.
To say the RLX/ILX are bland is opinion and one that I dont think is the cause of the sales issue for the reasons I've already stated. I think the ILX is a hot looking car. To me its the evolution of the Integra. And Ive already stated what I think of the RLX.
Most people i know arent enthusiasts, and i will tell you if they dont like the way the car looks, or it doesnt catch their eye in some way to make them want to go check it out, it doesnt matter if it had a larger steering wheel, tpms, nvh they arent going to look at it nor purchase it. What you suggest is like saying you think your wife is ugly but you married her because she chews her food quietly.
Ill just leave it at we agree to disagree. Everyone has different tastes, what one likes the other may not.