Turbo Kit for Acura TL '04-'08

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2011, 07:28 PM
  #4881  
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Hi speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Received 256 Likes on 208 Posts
i just finished up my custom turbo intake ( 45 degree elbow and a AEM dry flow filter) a few days ago for my V1 piping kit. This was a serious pain in the ass because the space is so limited by the fuse box, shiter linkage, ground cables and other stuff. I have been working on this project for over a month with ordering and waiting on parts, sending parts back ( I love Summit Racing ) and trying every way under the sun to make the parts fit. Looking at the car with a flashlight and trying to figure what can be moved and streached without messing something up.

Now that I am done I'm pretty happy with the result. I took a 4 inch ID 45 degree elbow with 4 inch legs from ebay for $25 and a 4 inch OD aluminum pipe joiner about $14 also from ebay. I bought a 5 inch tall by 6 inch round AEM dry filter ( because filter oil buggs me ) about $50 part # AEM 21-205dk, I orginally bought the larger 9 inch by 6 in AEM filter but it was not going to fit and after trying for over a week I sent it back for my present filter.

I was running a smaller filter clamped right to the turbo, but it was dirty and just too small CFM wise for the power levels I am aiming for. No doubt theses little filters can flow more that they are rated for under boost, but I needed a bigger filter and a way to put some distance between it and the turbo. I have held off on getting a turbo blanket for fear it might do more harm than good interms of cooking the bearings and all that heat is going right into the turbo. My hope is my little intake combined with a larger filter will source air slightly farther away from the turbo avoiding heat soak until I can sort out if I am going to run a blanket or not. Here are some pics.


Name:  aug11upload030.jpg
Views: 574
Size:  120.3 KB
Name:  aug11upload031.jpg
Views: 533
Size:  95.9 KB
Name:  aug11upload032.jpg
Views: 534
Size:  118.7 KB
Old 08-20-2011, 11:31 PM
  #4882  
313.4WHP& 284.6TQ
 
mmcv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good job i like it...
Old 08-22-2011, 03:24 AM
  #4883  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Which type of raybestos clutch pack is optimal for 500 @ wheels and used on the street? Im reading on forums that the blues are best for high power applications but more drag strip oriented.

Here is raybestos clutch pack guide
http://www.raybestospowertrain.com/p...late_guide.pdf

As you can see, raybestos makes clutches and steels for the 3g TL. FYI, our 5AT trans code is BDGA
http://www.raybestospowertrain.com/p.../RCP96-192.pdf

http://www.raybestospowertrain.com/p...list_trans.pdf

Updated list of part numbers for 3g TL trans code BDGA
http://www.raybestospowertrain.com/p...PX_revised.pdf

The search continues...
Old 08-22-2011, 09:49 AM
  #4884  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
The Alto reds are great for high power applications. You may have to play with which fluids you use, straight Type-F might be too aggressive, a mix with DexIII may be necessary but that's a long way off. The worst thing that will happen is harsh shifts. I've done this for many years, fine tuning the shift firmness with the type of fluid.
Old 08-22-2011, 10:10 PM
  #4885  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Raybestos doesnt have any performance clutches that will work for the TL. They do however have a rebuild kit for the TL with new gaskets, seals and their basic tan clutch packs. I would still have to think these are better then oem but Im just guessing.

Alto has high energy clutches but Im still trying to find if they have the reds available.

OEM Tq converter arrived today. Sent it out to import performance trans to let do their work.

I wasnt sure how to measure the converter to get the correct diameter. I dont know if you measure the front using the teeth as the widest point so I measure the rear without the teeth. It measures 11 7/8"

Not much to see here
Old 08-22-2011, 10:57 PM
  #4886  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Cool. This is the first time that I seen a TL converter. Smaller than I had thought. Thanks for the pic and update Bert.
Old 08-23-2011, 12:03 AM
  #4887  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
So I'm guessing the outer splines are the drive for the pump.... For some reason it looked weird at first. So it's basically a 10" converter. Not a bad starting point.
Old 08-23-2011, 11:28 AM
  #4888  
Got your mom in
iTrader: (3)
 
Silva-type-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carol City, FL
Age: 37
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
Cool. This is the first time that I seen a TL converter. Smaller than I had thought. Thanks for the pic and update Bert.
its heavy as shit though
Old 08-23-2011, 12:47 PM
  #4889  
1st 3g Turbo TL-S
iTrader: (5)
 
Xiomaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 38
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
[QUOTE=I hate cars;13176142]I used to hate it when people put V8s in these things. Here's an all time low. I wish he lived a little closer to me.... To his credit I think it's not an original turbo car, just a clone.

I just saw an oriinal GN down here in palm beach gardens FL on fri.
It was mint! and in a handicap space! Y NOT ME!!!!!!(the car that is)
Old 08-23-2011, 02:55 PM
  #4890  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Yea the converter was very heavy. About 35 pounds or so.

Alto does not make red clutches for the TL

They do have high energy greens available (same ones Richie bought a while ago). Rebuild kit with clutches but no steels is 280$ (same price as raybestos rebuild kit). Rebuild kit with steels is 370$ but they are on backorder
Old 08-23-2011, 07:10 PM
  #4891  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
Yea the converter was very heavy. About 35 pounds or so.

Alto does not make red clutches for the TL

They do have high energy greens available (same ones Richie bought a while ago). Rebuild kit with clutches but no steels is 280$ (same price as raybestos rebuild kit). Rebuild kit with steels is 370$ but they are on backorder
If they don't have red, they probably don't have blues?? Blues pretty much have to be matched with Koleen steels. Very, very tough and hard to destroy. It might be worth checking on.

Regular old Raybestos clutches will take a lot of power but if any slippage occurs they will burn out quicker. IMO it becomes much more important to have very quick snappy shifts and great shift timing when using the stockish clutches but they will hold a lot of power as long as everything else is perfect.

You can check to see if they offer any clutch packs that offer an additional clutch or two per pack for additional holding power. This would be the same as adding a larger clutch with more holding power on a manual. You can get them where each clutch and/or steel is thinner so that you can fit more clutches in each pack without the machine work or aftermarket hard parts. The downside is that while they will hold more power they won't have as much wear material.
Old 08-23-2011, 11:08 PM
  #4892  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
Raybestos does not have blues for the TL either. At the moment, the only options are high energy greens from alto or raybestos oem equivalents which I believe are their tan version.

I was reading about adding additional clutches for more power but I need to do lots of research on this.

For the time being, a modified converter is the only upgrade Im going to do right now. I would rather keep pushing the oem clutches to the max then start experimenting with new clutches right now.

My thinking is this. If I add a new converter and aftermarket clutches at the same time and something goes wrong, it might be difficult to pinpoint the problem. Does that make sense?
Old 08-23-2011, 11:31 PM
  #4893  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by libert69
Raybestos does not have blues for the TL either. At the moment, the only options are high energy greens from alto or raybestos oem equivalents which I believe are their tan version.

I was reading about adding additional clutches for more power but I need to do lots of research on this.

For the time being, a modified converter is the only upgrade Im going to do right now. I would rather keep pushing the oem clutches to the max then start experimenting with new clutches right now.

My thinking is this. If I add a new converter and aftermarket clutches at the same time and something goes wrong, it might be difficult to pinpoint the problem. Does that make sense?
Definitely. The good thing about the higher stall converter is that you probably won't be able to feel your part throttle shifts at all. It tends to make things easier on the trans during normal driving. That's one thing to look out for, don't be worried if the shifts feel too soft as long as they're quick.
Old 08-28-2011, 11:04 AM
  #4894  
MC_Driver
 
jbrow117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
That's terrible ignorant advice (the other threads, not Inaccurate lol).

You can choose a lock or non lockup converter. I can say from experience, the city mpg will drop, the freeway will be identical if you use a lockup converter. I highly recommend a lockup if you do lots of freeway driving or a huge cooler in it's place.

The only thing I'm afraid of is a modified stock converter might give you a taste of how good the highs stall is but you might be a little disappointed too. I'm only guessing since you will be the pioneer. I hope I'm wrong. I have some hookups and I'm more than happy to help. I'll be glad to cover some of the costs out of pocket just to see this project go through.
I have an auto trans soo...I'll be glad to cover some of the costs out of pocket just to see this project go through! Where are we sending donations?

Last edited by jbrow117; 08-28-2011 at 11:10 AM. Reason: Too long
Old 08-28-2011, 11:08 AM
  #4895  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,843 Likes on 8,574 Posts
Originally Posted by jbrow117
I'll be glad to cover some of the costs out of pocket just to see this project go through! Where are we sending donations?
Paypal Majofo
Old 08-28-2011, 03:57 PM
  #4896  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
i dont think i feel right taking your guys money for use on my car. converter is at the shop now and is scheduled to be shipped back to me on tuesday
Old 08-28-2011, 11:11 PM
  #4897  
05' AT SSM
 
KzooTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Age: 42
Posts: 464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I found these pictures on the net, i like the turbo placement in this.
Name:  AcuraTLTurbo02.jpg
Views: 1195
Size:  161.4 KB
Name:  AcuraTLTurboExhaust.jpg
Views: 375
Size:  139.3 KB
Old 08-28-2011, 11:29 PM
  #4898  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
I like that setup besides the lack of air filtration. Remember, there are reverse compressor housings out there so there is some flexibility when designing the system.
Old 08-29-2011, 12:00 AM
  #4899  
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Hi speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Received 256 Likes on 208 Posts
That setup looks a little questionable to me. The hot side of the turbo and exhaust manifold comming up next to all the electronics in that area not to mention the proximity to the IM. I like seeing new designs and ways of getting the job done, but the way this was done seems poorly designed. I wonder how it runs.
Old 08-29-2011, 12:04 AM
  #4900  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,843 Likes on 8,574 Posts
Is that supposed to keep small dogs and children out.
Old 08-29-2011, 10:39 AM
  #4901  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
Nice job with the exhaust under the car.
Old 08-29-2011, 12:39 PM
  #4902  
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
handsom-hustla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Age: 38
Posts: 413
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
He has videos on you tube. I think at 6 psi he was making early 300.. I believe he was located in Canada. It was a custom set up but didn't real make solid power. That turbo is way oversized for the application.
Old 08-29-2011, 12:44 PM
  #4903  
Pro
iTrader: (3)
 
bmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 619
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
The exhaust side on that turbo looked a little large, but the intake side looks about right. One thing I wish the J&R setup had, that that kit has, is 3" piping coming off of the turbo and back to the exhaust. That's going to be one of the biggest bottlenecks in my setup. At some point I'll probably have some new piping made, but my primary concern for now is just getting it running.
Old 08-29-2011, 01:24 PM
  #4904  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by bmeyer
The exhaust side on that turbo looked a little large, but the intake side looks about right. One thing I wish the J&R setup had, that that kit has, is 3" piping coming off of the turbo and back to the exhaust. That's going to be one of the biggest bottlenecks in my setup. At some point I'll probably have some new piping made, but my primary concern for now is just getting it running.
What size is the dp on the J&R kit? 3" is about the minimum for 400hp. 3.5" for 600+. Otherwise you're not only hurting power but spool too.
Old 08-29-2011, 02:17 PM
  #4905  
Pro
iTrader: (3)
 
bmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 619
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
What size is the dp on the J&R kit? 3" is about the minimum for 400hp. 3.5" for 600+. Otherwise you're not only hurting power but spool too.
The outlet on the turbo is 3", but the piping is reduced down to 2.5" immediately off of the turbo for about 4-5 feet of piping. That's most of the reason for my earlier argument that running the ATLP quads isn't going to be the biggest bottleneck. Fluid dynamics wasn't my strongest subject in school, but ideally you would have a turbo with a 3.5" exit and run that all the way back to the muffler(s). The next best solution would be to would run 3" off of the turbo and then slowly taper up to 3.5"+. The down-side is that A.) it's difficult to get piping which tapers at the proper rate, and B.) it's more difficult to work with (read: bend).
Old 08-29-2011, 02:20 PM
  #4906  
1st Gear
 
SteelSkhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denver
Age: 35
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much of your drivetrain did you improve to handle the extra strain? There 110000 miles on my whip and fear ill kill my engine.
I would love to put this mod on my TL. But messing with the innards scares me on the slightest, i just barely took care of all my cosmetic mods and once installed the ride will be super custom and beautifully simple.

Anyone interested in cheaper than wholesale mods apply for a sponsorship, its easy... 700 more unique views on this video and i will get $500 to put towards my parts. Please help me out and help yourself out and watch the video!
http://videosponsorships.com/v/1313683676_2027_40

Thanks
Old 08-29-2011, 02:46 PM
  #4907  
10th Gear
 
Bx176's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 42
Posts: 11
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey Guys just started reading this thread yesterday got to page 15 cant read all of it, really great info tho! Too many post to read in order to catch up, did they crack ECU, did the OP accomplish what he started? Thanks in advance guys!
Old 08-29-2011, 03:43 PM
  #4908  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 435 Likes on 320 Posts
^yes. Nearly everything has been accomplished.
Old 08-29-2011, 04:59 PM
  #4909  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
@bmeyer
Does the V2 J&R piping differ from the original version?
I'll have to pull it all apart to see if I have the same reduction post-turbo.

Also,
I asked this on kikazz's build but what is the advantage of the wastegate dump into the atmosphere vs the downipe?

Last edited by KN_TL; 08-29-2011 at 05:08 PM.
Old 08-29-2011, 05:32 PM
  #4910  
Pro
iTrader: (3)
 
bmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 619
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
Originally Posted by KN_TL
@bmeyer
Does the V2 J&R piping differ from the original version?
I'll have to pull it all apart to see if I have the same reduction post-turbo.

Also,
I asked this on kikazz's build but what is the advantage of the wastegate dump into the atmosphere vs the downipe?
It's tough to define the "V2" since there seem to be about a half dozen different setups... What I know is this... My setup has a little nicer Y-pipe (compared to the V1) which joins just under the front-side of the engine and runs up to the turbo. It then circles back around the back of the transmission and then takes a couple of 90 degree turns back to the mid-pipe.

There are a couple of advantages to the atmospheric wastegate dump... First is that it simplifies the exhaust piping. Second is that it's just that much less exhaust gasses flowing through the smaller exhaust piping. The down-side is that it doesn't sound all that great. Personally, I hate the way open wastegates sound.

Edit: I'll snap some photos this week and email them to you so that you can see what I'm talking about.

Last edited by bmeyer; 08-29-2011 at 05:34 PM.
Old 08-29-2011, 05:38 PM
  #4911  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by KN_TL
@bmeyer
Does the V2 J&R piping differ from the original version?
I'll have to pull it all apart to see if I have the same reduction post-turbo.

Also,
I asked this on kikazz's build but what is the advantage of the wastegate dump into the atmosphere vs the downipe?
Nothing besides cost of labor assuming the exhaust is free flowing enough. Personally I always put it back into the exhaust stream, I can't stand the sound when the wastegate opens. If your exhaust is restrictive you can run into boost creep but it's a very slim possibility. If it's restrictive, the wastegate can't vent as well but at the same time the exhaust flow is restricted so it usually evens out.
The following users liked this post:
gerzand (09-01-2011)
Old 08-29-2011, 05:42 PM
  #4912  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by bmeyer
The outlet on the turbo is 3", but the piping is reduced down to 2.5" immediately off of the turbo for about 4-5 feet of piping. That's most of the reason for my earlier argument that running the ATLP quads isn't going to be the biggest bottleneck. Fluid dynamics wasn't my strongest subject in school, but ideally you would have a turbo with a 3.5" exit and run that all the way back to the muffler(s). The next best solution would be to would run 3" off of the turbo and then slowly taper up to 3.5"+. The down-side is that A.) it's difficult to get piping which tapers at the proper rate, and B.) it's more difficult to work with (read: bend).
Wow, that's a place for improvement especially considering you have enough airflow for 600hp. I've run mine through a 2.5" dp all the way until it splits into dual exhaust at at around 500hp, switching to a 3" made a world of difference. It's best to come off of the turbo as large as possible and if it has to neck down, it's best to do it as far from the turbo as possible. I know a lot of guys that run a 3.5" that necks down to 3" a couple feet from the turbo. Spool and dynamics are much better with the larger dp.

The vortex coming out of the turbine wheel should have a good 6" straight shot out of the turbo with at least the same diameter as the wheel when possible.
Old 08-29-2011, 08:39 PM
  #4913  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
The size of the dump tube is really small. If it were better then i would begin my new piping off the turbo. Since there doesn't seem to be any advantage, I am just going to cut below the dump tube and reroute from there.

I don't think the original design changes the tube diameter but I won't know for sure until I get into it.



Old 08-29-2011, 09:29 PM
  #4914  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
If that's a real 3rd cat laying on the floor, it would be a good idea to dump back in after the cat.
Old 08-29-2011, 10:09 PM
  #4915  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
It's my inspection passing device. Only stays in for a short time. I have a 100 cell that I want to try just to see if it cuts down the stank. But if it messes with the spool, it'll just be used for getting it inspected once a year.
Old 08-30-2011, 06:43 PM
  #4916  
Pro
iTrader: (3)
 
bmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 619
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
By the way, for anyone looking for a nicer setup when plumbing their wastegate, I ordered up some parts the other day and made something similar to this:



It basically uses the same types of fittings found in most water/meth kits. It cost me a total of $17 to piece it together. I purchased the fittings from Automation Direct. I had to enlarge the threads on my boost control solenoid in order to get the fittings in, but that was a pretty simple task.

I found this on another Honda forum but I didn't have any luck contacting this Tempest Racing.
Old 08-30-2011, 08:46 PM
  #4917  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
I wish I had seen this when I was melting silicone hoses......
Old 08-30-2011, 09:09 PM
  #4918  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Very nice on the hoses. It's pretty important that these are reliable since a broken or melted one has the potential to cause a blown engine.
Old 09-01-2011, 03:17 PM
  #4919  
18psi
iTrader: (7)
 
libert69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: long island
Age: 41
Posts: 2,048
Received 94 Likes on 68 Posts
I got my converter back from Import performance transmission today. Honestly, the only difference I can see from the outside is that its painted black now.

I took a lot of pictures of all the welds on the converter before It went out and ALL the spot welds look exactly the same

The one solid weld that goes around the entire circumference of the converter looks different. Im assuming this is where they cut the converter open.

Is this typically how the process is done? Do shops basically chop the converter in half and use this as the entrance point into the converter? Is it normal for all the spot welds to stay same?

The converter was drained as best as I could before I sent it out. Not completely dry but no drips. I noticed that inside the converter still has some slight red trans fluid. I stuck a paper towel in the inlet and it had some fluid residue on the towel when I took it out. Shouldn't the internals be completely dry if they were modified? Or is it common practice to lube all the parts before re-assembly?

Spot weld looks EXACTLY the same. Notice the small indentation




Notice the red circle. This piece of metal was removed. Once again, the weld looks 100% the same.




This is solid weld that goes around the entire circumference. This weld looks different.


Old 09-01-2011, 03:25 PM
  #4920  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Looks perfectly normal. You're correct, the weld around the circumference is how they get into the converter. The starter ring stays attached so they never broke those welds. The balance weight is gone, maybe meaning they balanced it as well. Everything will be assembled with ATF or whatever assembly lube they use, usually ATF though. As long as it's new fluid it's normal. I think you have nothing to worry about, can't wait to hear your review. What was this supposed to be, about 2,800rpm?

This is the one area I tend to not be so conservative on. As long as they know it's for a turbo car they will usually build it a little on the loose side. There's a big difference in a 600ft lb big block with 100% of the torque available right away vs a turbo 6 that needs boost to make torque. The turbo car needs a looser convertor just to get boost to hit the stall speed.


Quick Reply: Turbo Kit for Acura TL '04-'08



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.