Originally Posted by ttribe

Are you suggesting there are no used cars with the adequate safety features?

Originally Posted by Saintor

In recent used compact cars in 9-11K$ range, there is basically none. Above that range, I prefer new. IIRC, 2012 is the first year that those devices are on all versions.

I am not interested in paying 1000-1200$ for A/C at all. I had plenty of cars without it and in Canada, it is not as much as a concern as in the Southern US. We will survive.

Originally Posted by Saintor

I am rather suggesting that you didn't read and / or understand (again) the post #15.

Originally Posted by Saintor

Take note that this perfect imbecile just jumped in a thread where he had no business just to stir some trouble.

Originally Posted by ttribe

1 - that's a mod issue; not mine.

2 - I've certainly seen you give as good as you've got.

Originally Posted by Saintor

Find one thread where I initiated troubles. You'll find none. I just choose to respond to a few idiots whenever I feel like.

Originally Posted by ttribe

So? You're hyper-reactionary. The slightest bit of criticism of your position and you launch into histrionics and invectives (for example - https://acurazine.com/forums/showpos...1&postcount=69). You're just as guilty of derails as anyone who "started it."

Nevertheless, pretty sure you launched the first salvo here: https://acurazine.com/forums/showpos...6&postcount=16

Originally Posted by Saintor

No I didn't. If you have problem reading and / or understanding - and you do, that your problem.

Originally Posted by ttribe

Fine example of - slightest criticism and you launch into histrionics and invectives.

Are you really suggesting that the "efficiency" quip was worth your reply. Gimme a break.

Originally Posted by Saintor

Everybody knows what he really meant by that.. You are definitely a pointless whiner. Talk about honda Civic 2012 or get lost.

Originally Posted by ttribe

React to a BB gun with a 1000lb. bomb. Overkill.


"slightest criticism and you launch into histrionics and invectives."


I see no financial benefit to leasing a brand new car for a teenager given the plethora of available, and cheap, used cars our there.

There. I've opined. Feel happy now?

Originally Posted by Saintor

See your understanding is lacking *again* here.

Why again did I chose a brand new Civic over an used car? Look at post #1 and You have no right to fail again.

Originally Posted by ttribe

Good grief, you can't help yourself, can you?



You talking about this statement - "THE factor I went new is because standard ESP / 6 airbags is standard. Security is an important consideration (again the car is for our children). I am a strong believer in these technologies and decided to put my money where my mouth is."?

Are you suggesting there are no used cars with the adequate safety features?

Originally Posted by Sarlacc

Wow, sounds like you two need to get a room...

Originally Posted by ttribe

Douche.

Originally Posted by MTEAZY

...

Originally Posted by MTEAZY

...

Originally Posted by Sarlacc

Wow, sounds like you two need to get a room...

Originally Posted by ttribe

Touche. I deserved that for getting sucked into his stupid arguments.

Originally Posted by Sarlacc

typical Saintor replies:

You're dumb
You're gay
You're a dumbass

Hit Repeat.

For an arrogant (read ignorant) frenchie I'm surprised/underwhelmed by 3rd grade "wit"

Originally Posted by JS + MS3

Every thread you post turns into this type of garbage.

Originally Posted by Saintor

Only a gay would say this kind of stuff to two males.

Originally Posted by Saintor

Only a gay would say this kind of stuff to two males.



No. You don't deserve that since you did it in a relatively civil manner.

BTW, yes I spend more to get ESP. I remember that exactly 20 years ago, I did the same when I insisted to get ABS as a 600$ option on my then brand new Mazda MX-3 Precidia GS V6 1.8L 1992.

Originally Posted by oonowindoo

wtf is this? 1.8L V6?

Originally Posted by wiki

The 1.8 L (1845 cc) K8 is among the smallest production V6 engines ever; and also the first K-series engine to be used in a Mazda car (in the Mazda MX-3). It was a DOHC 4-valve design with VRIS and a 75 mm (3.0 in) bore and 69.6 mm stroke. It produced 130 hp (97 kW) in US trim

Originally Posted by Saintor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda_K_engine



It was too small for a 6 with no low-end guts. Many did a 2.5L swap from the MX-6/626/Probe. However it had a great engine note (rev limiter was 7500rpm).

Originally Posted by Saintor

Typical Sarlacc reply; an ultra-moronic kind of noise in a thread where he has no business.

Enjoy your Whitney Houston songs, drag queens style (of course).

Originally Posted by Sarlacc

because reptiles are cold blooded right?