Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Nikon: Rumor Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-11-2008, 05:38 PM
  #1  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Nikon: Rumor Thread

Not an official announcement yet, but there is alot of reliable information floating around about it.

http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/05/ni...-revealed.aspx

The replacement for the D80 will be called D90:

* Live View
* build in microphone
* HDMI and GPS connectors
* 12mp, ~4.5 fps
* video recording
* new lens 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G DX VR

For more info, just read the whole article @ bythom.com (from August 5th).


cant wait for photokina
i hope canon responds well there
Mizouse is online now  
Old 08-11-2008, 07:57 PM
  #2  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
D90 + 18-105 = $1299?

http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/11/ni...-order-it.aspx

that would be incredible.. I'd honestly be interested in it. I just want a smaller camera.
srika is offline  
The following users liked this post:
aspec tl (08-04-2011)
Old 08-11-2008, 08:37 PM
  #3  
Three Wheelin'
 
achenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Orleans LA area
Age: 51
Posts: 1,935
Received 198 Likes on 68 Posts
Of course after I bought a D80 Saturday.
achenator is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:39 PM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
did you consult AZ first? I don't recall seeing a thread about it...
srika is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:52 PM
  #5  
Three Wheelin'
 
achenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Orleans LA area
Age: 51
Posts: 1,935
Received 198 Likes on 68 Posts
No but i read the whole freakin' photography page about 4 times. LOL. I knew that the D90 was coming out but everything I read didn't say exactly when. That's ok i'll prolly never use the D80 to half of it's potential.
achenator is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 09:18 PM
  #6  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
well if it makes you feel better, there hasnt yet been an official announcement from Nikon yet.
Mizouse is online now  
Old 08-11-2008, 10:30 PM
  #7  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
video recording?

I fucking hope not.
Sarlacc is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 10:37 PM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
video recording?

I fucking hope not.
Why the hell not? I think it'll be great, in fact I've been waiting for someone to do it. If it doesn't happen now, it will later. Wondering how they would implement it though. If they did it on the more "pro" lines of cameras yeah I would feel the same way as you.
srika is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 10:51 PM
  #9  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I think they need to keep SLRs AS SLRs.

Or youre going to end up seeing on the pro models.
Sarlacc is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 10:53 PM
  #10  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
They can't do it well with p&s's, why start with DSLR's. I'm going back to film, if they do. A still camera is a still camera, a video camera is a video camera. I don't want video in my still camera, I want better sensors, better DR and more bits, before they start with this crap.
jupitersolo is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 10:55 PM
  #11  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
it's inevitable. but I don't see it ever happening to the more "serious" SLR's.

and I disagree, there are a few P&S's that take exemplary video, for their size.
srika is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:00 PM
  #12  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
The only P&S worth video is the Canon G9 and it's stuck at 1024. All the rest are BS, compared to a real video camera.
jupitersolo is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:02 PM
  #13  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
The only P&S worth video is the Canon G9 and it's stuck at 1024. All the rest are BS, compared to a real video camera.
compared to a real one sure. but who wants to carry around a DSLR and a video camera... I sure as fawk don't.
srika is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:02 PM
  #14  
Team Owner
 
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts


Somewhat underwhelmed....
TS_eXpeed is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:05 PM
  #15  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
compared to a real one sure. but who wants to carry around a DSLR and a video camera... I sure as fawk don't.
That's what I'm saying a video is for video and still for stills, I don't want a half nothing, the better tool for the right job.


I stopped carrying a video camera, it's SLR, I only take a video camera when I want to video.
jupitersolo is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:46 PM
  #16  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
i can see it being useful on occasion, but if you dont want it, then dont use it.

its not too hard to implement since there is live view already.
Mizouse is online now  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:46 PM
  #17  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
its rumored that canon is going this route as well.
Mizouse is online now  
Old 08-12-2008, 12:02 AM
  #18  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
The only P&S worth video is the Canon G9 and it's stuck at 1024. All the rest are BS, compared to a real video camera.
for the little videos people make with them they are fine.

And you are forgetting the TX1...
Sarlacc is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 12:03 AM
  #19  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
They can't do it well with p&s's, why start with DSLR's. I'm going back to film, if they do. A still camera is a still camera, a video camera is a video camera. I don't want video in my still camera, I want better sensors, better DR and more bits, before they start with this crap.
Sarlacc is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 12:05 AM
  #20  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
PS: Youre all pussies. I carry both



that pic was taken over 4 years ago...
Sarlacc is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 12:28 AM
  #21  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
hooters huh. what were you filming? :wink:
Mizouse is online now  
Old 08-12-2008, 03:43 AM
  #22  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
for the little videos people make with them they are fine.

And you are forgetting the TX1...
that's all I'm saying.

I am in line for the D90!!!!!!! would be nice if it has some ADR type thing(s) from the D300 too... but at that price, I kinda doubt it.

oh yeah high ISO performance ala D700/D3 would be nice too.. ok I need to go back to sleep.
srika is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 08:18 AM
  #23  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
for the little videos people make with them they are fine.

And you are forgetting the TX1...
Yes and no. Canon screwed the ergonomics of that thing up.
jupitersolo is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 09:00 AM
  #24  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
This thread wasn't opening so I goggled D90.

http://yourphotoarchive.com/laugh.htm

They had me for a second.
dom is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 11:40 AM
  #25  
Drifting
 
zguy95135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 3,132
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
video recording?

I fucking hope not.


I think Live View is pretty stupid too, an SLR should be used as an SLR
zguy95135 is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 11:46 AM
  #26  
Team Owner
 
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts
I with everybody on the live view thing.

I honestly think it's dumb.

I've only had my D300 now for 3 weeks or so, and to be honest, I find it annoying. It takes like 3 extra click before the picture actually takes.

Call me picky, but it's annoying as (expletive)

I never use it.
TS_eXpeed is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 12:05 PM
  #27  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
This thread wasn't opening so I goggled D90.

http://yourphotoarchive.com/laugh.htm

They had me for a second.
Ive seen this before and I was curious about it...but the way mizouse posted it it seemed like it wasnt a joke.

fucking mizouse.
Sarlacc is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 12:39 PM
  #28  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Ive seen this before and I was curious about it...but the way mizouse posted it it seemed like it wasnt a joke.

fucking mizouse.
I don't think mizouse's post was a joke.

Though that link I posted certainly was.
dom is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 01:07 PM
  #29  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
fuckin dom
Sarlacc is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 01:12 PM
  #30  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
What, you don't think it will have Universal Vibration reduction?

Or have PhotoShop CS3 built in?

In an effort to avoid such distasteful events this time around, and ensure everybody can enjoy a D90, Nikon now supports the following storage formats...

* SD
* CF
* XD
* Memory Stick
* 3.5 inch floppy
* 5.25 inch floppy
* 8 inch floppy (in MB-D90b only)
* CD/DVD (in MB-D90b only)
* High-speed paper tape to maintain compatibility with Colossus
* Punch cards




Although VR built in would be interesting and a huge surprise.
dom is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 01:27 PM
  #31  
Team Owner
 
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts
^^^

Lol....I saw that excerpt of that spoof website and thought
TS_eXpeed is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 02:08 PM
  #32  
Have camera, will travel
 
waTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Federal Way, WA
Age: 62
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Canon needs to come up with the goods and soon. And I agree that still cameras and video cameras should stay separate. The last thing I want on my SLR is vid capability.
waTSX is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 02:10 PM
  #33  
Team Owner
 
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by waTSX
I think Canon needs to come up with the goods and soon. And I agree that still cameras and video cameras should stay separate. The last thing I want on my SLR is vid capability.

Well if we all agree that vid should stay on vid camera and not still camera, what does Canon need to come up with.

Really, that was that only thing that could have a factor in this camera.
TS_eXpeed is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 02:20 PM
  #34  
Have camera, will travel
 
waTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Federal Way, WA
Age: 62
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They need an answer to the D300, they need to get the 5D replacement out, and an answer to the D90, though there's not enough info on that yet. The XSi may be better than that already.
waTSX is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 02:39 PM
  #35  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Canon never had an answer to the D80. The XTi was priced lower and the 30/40D higher. That won't change.

just like they won't really have an answer to the D300, on least on price.
dom is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 02:48 PM
  #36  
Have camera, will travel
 
waTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Federal Way, WA
Age: 62
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess I'm hoping that will change with the success of the D300. We'll see.
waTSX is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 02:52 PM
  #37  
Team Owner
 
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by waTSX
I guess I'm hoping that will change with the success of the D300. We'll see.

I don't think there is much to worry about.

It's a see-saw is what it boils down to. Nikon is on the up side of it right now. Sooner or later Canon will respond pushing themselves back up and so on and so forth.
TS_eXpeed is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 03:49 PM
  #38  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by waTSX
I guess I'm hoping that will change with the success of the D300. We'll see.

Curious, what exactly would you like to see from the 40D successor? While at the same time keeping the price point the same.

Or were you hoping the 40D moves up in price to compete more directly with the D300? Or an all new entry at that price from Canon?
dom is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 04:38 PM
  #39  
Have camera, will travel
 
waTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Federal Way, WA
Age: 62
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The biggest thing would be to upgrade the LCD to D300 levels. The 40D's stinks (IMO) and takes away from the camera overall. The rest of the 40D is excellent, IMO, and I would prefer that Canon not increase the pixels anymore. I think they could do the LCD and keep the price close to where it is now. By most accounts, the new Nikon's also have superior high ISO performance, and I wouldn't turn that down. I'n not sure if that would push the price above current levels though.

As for wanting the 40D replacement to move up to the D300 price point, I'm kind of torn and I can see why Canon might not want to do that. I would strongly consider buying a Canon competitor to the D300 body, if only for the better sealing and high ISO performance. Maybe a new entry would be a good idea.

It's all moot anyway. I haven't even sniffed the full capabilites of the 40D anyway.
waTSX is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 04:51 PM
  #40  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
there are rumors that canon is going to announce a 50D at photokina.
the rumors suggest 14mp, 8fps and 11af points.
Mizouse is online now  


Quick Reply: Nikon: Rumor Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.