Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13595649)
All things the competition had 2 years ago. Which is why I say stone age. And for a higher price tag.
I don't think you'll find many who will argue that they've been trailing behind Nikon for a while now, but "stone age" is maybe a wee bit of an exaggeration. With the huge gap between the 7D and 5DIII now...they really need to position something to fill it. |
dpreview's review states the 5D2 is "ALMOST" as good as the D700/D3
Almost |
Originally Posted by srika
(Post 13595677)
You are completely wrong. The dynamic range, white balance, and shadow/highlight reproduction of the 5D2 is on the same level as the D700. The 5D is a dinosaur compared to the 5D2, when it comes to those areas.
|
Yea bigger sensor?
They're both full frame.. :squint: |
Originally Posted by wndrlst
(Post 13595685)
Canon has had the things I listed for a long time, just not in the more affordable bodies, and it took them way too long to update the AF on the 5D line. I know their ISO capability hasn't been as good as Nikon's because they've been too hung up on MP's, but it's not like it's been crap, either.
I don't think you'll find many who will argue that they've been trailing behind Nikon for a while now, but "stone age" is maybe a wee bit of an exaggeration. With the huge gap between the 7D and 5DIII now...they really need to position something to fill it. In the tech world 2 years is an very long time, hence I say stone age. The 7D will most likely get an update soon enough...unless Canon is listening to the uproar right now and takes it back to the drawing board. |
Originally Posted by srika
(Post 13595677)
You are completely wrong. The dynamic range, white balance, and shadow/highlight reproduction of the 5D2 is on the same level as the D700. The 5D is a dinosaur compared to the 5D2, when it comes to those areas.
Originally Posted by wndrlst
(Post 13595690)
Yeah, I have to agree here, Jeff. Where did your objectivity go?
|
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13595689)
dpreview's review states the 5D2 is "ALMOST" as good as the D700/D3
Almost |
Originally Posted by Mizouse
(Post 13595691)
Yea bigger sensor?
They're both full frame.. :squint: |
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
(Post 13595699)
Not when it comes to the 5D2, it was nothing more than a 5D, with the 20D's auto focus system, which was six years old at that time. With some software tweaks to look better. It was Canon's video camera hypebol.
But...that said the sensor they switched in that body did have a big overall improvement in resolution and low light vs. 5D. |
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13595694)
Never said anything was crap ;)
In the tech world 2 years is an very long time, hence I say stone age. The 7D will most likely get an update soon enough...unless Canon is listening to the uproar right now and takes it back to the drawing board. And if you saw the state of my television and sound system, you'd know the true definition of stone age. Truly paleolithic. I'll be very curious to see what they do for the 7D. For now, I think I need to send my entire kit to Toshio for some calibration and keep on shooting. |
Originally Posted by Mizouse
(Post 13595703)
Well it is 12mp vs 21mp :shrug:
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13595711)
There is a huge difference between the sensor in the 5D and the 5D2...perhaps Jeff meant bigger MP.
|
:popcorn:
|
Need. Mo'. MONEY. :rofl:
|
:fluffy:
|
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13595718)
The huge "mark" huh huh huh of the 5D2 was the inclusion of 1080p video.
But...that said the sensor they switched in that body did have a big overall improvement in resolution and low light vs. 5D. |
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13595689)
dpreview's review states the 5D2 is "ALMOST" as good as the D700/D3
Almost |
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13595718)
The huge "mark" huh huh huh of the 5D2 was the inclusion of 1080p video.
But...that said the sensor they switched in that body did have a big overall improvement in resolution and low light vs. 5D. ok, maybe it's happened a few times over the past 10 yrs. |
Silent Shutter mode, wedding shooters will like that
|
Yea it's quite a difference too in the videos...
My 40D had a very silent shutter, but it only worked in live view :tomato: |
Originally Posted by is300eater
(Post 13595901)
Silent Shutter mode, wedding shooters will like that
|
Wasn't the MkII around 3k when it was first released? This is my take as a 7D user who has been patiently waiting for the MKIII- Once you are used to the awesome AF system on the 7D, it would almost be a downgrade using something not as robust. I am 99% positive I'll be picking up a 5D MKIII. The MKIII is like what the 5D MKII should have been and then some. Is it worth the price? Maybe not, but as my first FF, I won't have a problem with putting my pre-order in.
|
It'll be a phenomenal camera.
|
Glad I didn't get that 5D classic last month. haha
|
Hopefully the price of 5D MK2 will come down quite a bit! I want oneeeee
|
Originally Posted by JS + MS3
(Post 13596245)
Hopefully the price of 5D MK2 will come down quite a bit! I want oneeeee
|
Originally Posted by synth19
(Post 13596214)
wasn't the mkii around 3k when it was first released? This is my take as a 7d user who has been patiently waiting for the mkiii- once you are used to the awesome af system on the 7d, it would almost be a downgrade using something not as robust. I am 99% positive i'll be picking up a 5d mkiii. The mkiii is like what the 5d mkii should have been and then some. Is it worth the price? Maybe not, but as my first ff, i won't have a problem with putting my pre-order in.
|
Originally Posted by synth19
(Post 13596214)
Wasn't the MkII around 3k when it was first released?
So was the D700..and now the D800 I believe the 5D was also 3k, as was the 5D2 |
5D was $3299
|
:rofl:
My friend just posted on Facebook: "Thank you Canon, you just bought me a D800" |
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
(Post 13596355)
5D was $3299
:huh: |
Wasn't the 5D the first prosumer full frame camera?
I mean the only other body was the 1DS series right? |
Originally Posted by synth19
(Post 13596281)
More then the current price? There has to be some sort of control that it doesn't drop THAT much more.
|
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 13596357)
And people bitch that Nikon is more expensive???
:huh: |
Originally Posted by Mizouse
(Post 13596400)
Wasn't the 5D the first prosumer full frame camera?
I mean the only other body was the 1DS series right? |
you know what i mean :annoyed:
|
Hmmmm, doesn't sync @ 1/250th, that's kinda weak
|
Quite a few 5DII bodies are showing up on the local CL boards... going price seems to be $1900 - people are apparently looking to upgrade.
|
Originally Posted by is300eater
(Post 13596592)
Hmmmm, doesn't sync @ 1/250th, that's kinda weak
whats interesting is that the 20-60D/7D does, but the rebel is 1/200th.. of course the 1D4 goes up to 1/300th with a EX series speedlight.. :dunno: |
and the 1D classic went up to 1/500th, but thats due to the CCD sensor.
|
D70 does 1/500th also.
And, do some reading on High Speed Sync (HSS).. |
yes I know about HSS...
you should know this. |
I only learned about it in the past couple months, when I tried studio lighting.
|
why would you even need to shoot that fast in a studio?
almost all the times ive shot in a studio ive been at 1/125th @ F8 @ ISO 100 |
if you're using lighting outside in daylight - HSS lets you light up the subjects and have the background look dark.. it's a different effect but I know a number of people who use it.
|
when you said studio lights, i thought you were implying shooting in a studio with like a white BG etc.
:shrug: :doh: |
my bad
|
:zipit:
|
Originally Posted by Mizouse
(Post 13596865)
why would you even need to shoot that fast in a studio?
almost all the times ive shot in a studio ive been at 1/125th @ F8 @ ISO 100 in this photo, the back wall wasn't THAT dark... but it was shot @1/250 thus making the room look much darker. http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6098/6...c6266f8f_b.jpg If it had been @1/200, then it wouldn't be as dark. It's just a matter of what you're going for. But nice to be able to sync at a higher speed when you need it |
Originally Posted by is300eater
(Post 13596876)
just depends on how much of the ambient light you want to "kill".
in this photo, the back wall wasn't THAT dark... but it was shot @1/250 thus making the room look much darker. http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6098/6...c6266f8f_b.jpg If it had been @1/200, then it wouldn't be as dark. It's just a matter of what you're going for. But nice to be able to sync at a higher speed when you need it but i was assuming he meant a studio situation like this. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...1D2N4124_1.jpg where i would control how light or dark the BG is by the lights :shrug: :gag: |
|
everytime i see a picture of a canon body like that i think of the terminator :shrug:
|
Originally Posted by srika
(Post 13596863)
I only learned about it in the past couple months, when I tried studio lighting.
|
Originally Posted by srika
(Post 13596863)
I only tried it in the past couple months, when I tried studio lighting.
|
New 5D Mark III officially pre-ordered bitches.
|
I hate you. :tongue:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands