Originally Posted by pttl
(Post 14183326)
Trying to find that out. do you have a link or something?
like asianspec said, download your manual and look at the custom function area. |
:woot: got it! :scrib: for youtube!
|
DRTV does the review on the 6D
Cons: hate the 1 AF point 1 SD card slot. (not even CF) 1/4000 maximum TV speed 4.5 fps(not really a con but coming from a 7D is a downer) more expensive than a 5d2 Pros: Wifi can operate wireless through mobile device. cheaper than 5d3 Imo. i would get a 5d2 than this. |
1 AF point?
Should be 11 |
Originally Posted by Mizouse
(Post 14192337)
1 AF point?
Should be 11 |
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Pub...ge/Comparisons
:sigh: canons next cameras need to push more than 24bits of color depth and 12 stop of dynamic range. |
The 6D is a joke imo. if they were going that shitty of a new camera release they shouldve never released at all. Other than the Wifi, there is no point for the camera. just get a 5D2 which is cheaper.
|
http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/07/n...mm-coming-cr1/
A new 50mm lens on the horizon? Over the last few days I have received a lot of hints that a new EF 50mm lens is coming down the pipeline. There are even reports of people shooting with the new lens and that it may have appeared on an updated Canon price list (I would love to see the price list). The retail price is said to be $849 on an “EF 50 f/1.4 II”. We recently reported that an IS version of the focal length exists in prototype form. It’s pretty normal to have multiple versions of a lens. There’s always a risk with price lists and typos, and we have seen a lens appear on a price list before it was announced. The announcement came 6 months later, so this may not be an imminent thing. The good news is that there is a lot of chatter about the focal length going around. |
Rubin (or Synth, Chod, or anyone else who picked one up that I'm not remembering), after living with the Mk III a while, how are you liking it? Worth the $$$? Looks like I can pick one up for $3K right now, and I'm thinking of pulling the trigger. And probably selling one of the 7D's.
|
Originally Posted by wndrlst
(Post 14228507)
Rubin (or Synth, Chod, or anyone else who picked one up that I'm not remembering), after living with the Mk III a while, how are you liking it? Worth the $$$? Looks like I can pick one up for $3K right now, and I'm thinking of pulling the trigger. And probably selling one of the 7D's.
Although, I am a tad annoyed by the 6D. Mainly the noise test they did. Did you see it? I don't know what exactly is different about it, but if that test can be trusted (I don't see why not) - it seems like a pretty big difference somewhere. That being said, the 6D does lack in a good number of very important areas, such as AF. The AF on the 5D3 my gosh it's good. You have 7D's so you know about good AF. The 5D3's AF is similar, but improved. I don't think I would ever recommend the 6D over 5D3. But you should look into it yourself. Doing wedding photography, I think you'd need the AF of the 5D3. Any other questions just ask. |
Originally Posted by pttl
(Post 14180252)
any 17-55 2.8's or 15 - 85 3.5/5.6's?
:ninja: :chuckle:
Originally Posted by asianspec
(Post 14180266)
ask MWalsh, i believe he is still selling his. 17-55mm
I haven't put up my 10-22 for sale yet, but soon. |
Originally Posted by srika
(Post 14228586)
The 5D3 is frickin' bad ass. It's so good that I don't use it much
|
Originally Posted by srika
(Post 14228586)
The 5D3 is frickin' bad ass. It's so good that I don't use it much, if that makes any sense (??). It's like, I feel like it's overkill for most things. And having other cameras, I'd rather use them. It's kind of weird. It's a powerhouse for sure.
Although, I am a tad annoyed by the 6D. Mainly the noise test they did. Did you see it? I don't know what exactly is different about it, but if that test can be trusted (I don't see why not) - it seems like a pretty big difference somewhere. That being said, the 6D does lack in a good number of very important areas, such as AF. The AF on the 5D3 my gosh it's good. You have 7D's so you know about good AF. The 5D3's AF is similar, but improved. I don't think I would ever recommend the 6D over 5D3. But you should look into it yourself. Doing wedding photography, I think you'd need the AF of the 5D3. Any other questions just ask. I don't really understand the 6D. I'll look into it a little more, but yes the AF is a big thing for me. Even the 7D fails in low light more than I think it should. I'm sure some part of that is that my favorite lens is the 50L which is known for its focus shift issues, but it happens with all of them. If you never use it, wanna sell it? ;) |
Originally Posted by wndrlst
(Post 14228679)
Thanks, Rubin. I'm not sure I do understand...you just like the challenge of the others? :)
I don't really understand the 6D. I'll look into it a little more, but yes the AF is a big thing for me. Even the 7D fails in low light more than I think it should. I'm sure some part of that is that my favorite lens is the 50L which is known for its focus shift issues, but it happens with all of them. If you never use it, wanna sell it? ;) |
Alright....whats up with the 6d?
<----- dumbass :n00b: |
Originally Posted by pttl
(Post 14228899)
Alright....whats up with the 6d?
<----- dumbass :n00b: |
Originally Posted by pttl
(Post 14228899)
Alright....whats up with the 6d?
<----- dumbass :n00b: Wifi capablity. can shoot with a android or apple phone. Cons One SD card slot.(Good for people coming from the Rebel series.) Most XXD or XD camera shooters are on CF cards. and the fact there is only 1 slot. 11 AF points(1 of them are cross type) More Expensive than a 5D2 1/4000 Maximum shutter speed No joystick(well i like the joystick) |
5D2 is officially discontinued.
|
Originally Posted by Mizouse
(Post 14229081)
5D2 is officially discontinued.
|
6D is a joke imo.
It really makes Canon look like they are grasping at straws for that one. |
Tried my friend's, its pretty nice. Decent. Sure it is missing some things but it is also substantially lower $$ than the 5D3. The wireless control is a bit gimmicky but hey I wouldn't mind it. And, I think the 5D3 should have had wifi. And, I guess none of you have heard the 6D has better low-light performance than the 5D3. There was a high ISO test I posted somewhere and it really made me shake my head, and annoyed at Canon. The 6D does much better. Also, according to DXomark the 6D is better than the D800 and D600 above ISO 1600. It's not exactly a piece of shit.
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/89/748989.png |
Originally Posted by MWalsh9152
(Post 14228657)
:squint:
Originally Posted by wndrlst
(Post 14228679)
Thanks, Rubin. I'm not sure I do understand...you just like the challenge of the others? :)
I don't really understand the 6D. I'll look into it a little more, but yes the AF is a big thing for me. Even the 7D fails in low light more than I think it should. I'm sure some part of that is that my favorite lens is the 50L which is known for its focus shift issues, but it happens with all of them. If you never use it, wanna sell it? ;) |
Do you already have Nikon glass, if you're considering the D800? I bat that idea around, too, but with 4 Canon bodies and 8 lenses, I'm thinking not.
And yeah, after reminding myself of the specs of the 6D..I wouldn't touch it with someone else's 10 foot pole. :/ The noise handling would be the only piece of it that would be an improvement over the 7D. I don't need the WiFi. The SD slot is also a nonstarter for me, since I have well over 100GB's in CF cards. Thanks for elaborating. I don't know if I'll be continuing to shoot weddings or not. This would be a personal photography driven purchase rather than a business decision, though of course I'd still use it for paid gigs, too. |
I don't have any high end Nikon glass - I have a couple of lenses for the D70. 18-70 kit lens and a cheap 70-300. I doubt those would be good or even work with the D800.
I would start with the 14-24, and then the 24-70. Those would entertain me for a good while. |
Originally Posted by srika
(Post 14229453)
I don't have any high end Nikon glass - I have a couple of lenses for the D70. 18-70 kit lens and a cheap 70-300. I doubt those would be good or even work with the D800.
I would start with the 14-24, and then the 24-70. Those would entertain me for a good while. |
Originally Posted by is300eater
(Post 14229457)
I gotta admit, I stopped by a camera shop yesterday, initially to look at the Sony a99, but was turned off by the fact that Sony isn't doing any mark downs for the holidays. But the D600 AND the D800 were both marked down... talked to the sales guy for awhile and messed around a little with both the D600 and D800 and they both felt really good. Obviously, the D800 felt even more robust. The shop was pretty bright, but to demonstrate it's high ISO capabilities, the sales guy took a shot underneath the counter @6400 and 3200, and OMG!!! I was blown away by the D600's results.
|
Sony A99 release date: 9/11/2012
Nikon D600 release date: 9/13/2012 |
yeah, Sony isn't known for marking down their stuff until waaaaaaay later. The a77 is marked down this holiday season, but it's been out for a year.
|
http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/07/canon-powershot-n/
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget....powershotn.jpg No, you're not holding it wrong -- in fact, with Canon's new PowerShot N, any and every orientation is correct, thanks to a unique square design with key controls mounted around the center-positioned lens. In this case, a picture (of the camera body) tells far more than a thousand words -- this radical build is a bit tricky to explain, but we'll do our best. The idea here is that there's no one top or bottom, left or right side to the camera. Instead, those positions change based on how you've opted to orient the point-and-shoot. At 1.1 inches deep, the camera is very thin, yet it still packs an 8x 28mm f/3-5.9 lens. There's two rings around the barrel, with the first serving as a zoom toggle and the second used as a shutter release. The 2.8-inch, 461k-dot capacitive touchscreen is fixed at a slight angle, making it possible to take overhead and lower-angle shots simply by rotating the entire camera. There's a 12-megapixel CMOS sensor with a DIGIC 5 processor and an ISO range of 80-6400. It can snap 1080p video at 24 frames per second or 720p at 32 fps, and includes a bright LED that serves as an AF-assist lamp, a flash /and/ a video light. Canon opted to use microSD cards here, due to the camera's small size, along with a rechargeable battery that can be replenished through the USB connector -- a new Eco mode will enable an up to 30-percent boost in battery life, with the display powering down after eight seconds, then waking up when the built-in gyro sensor detects movement. There's WiFi connectivity with a dedicated Mobile Device Connect button, for direct access to an ad-hoc sharing mode. You'll also find a few software additions, including a Creative Shot mode that duplicates the image you just captured and applies "Intelligent Scene Analysis," cropping the frame and adjusting color and brightness without overwriting the original file. The PowerShot N is set to ship in April for $300, and will be available in both black and white. Canon also plans to release a handful of accessories, including a few unique concepts for wearing the camera around your neck, playing off of the model's compact form-factor and light weight. :squint: <iframe id="viddler-e8bc3406" src="//www.viddler.com/embed/e8bc3406/?f=1&offset=0&autoplay=0&secret=74278975&disablebr anding=0&view_secret=74278975" width="545" height="349" frameborder="0" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe> :squint: :squint: :squint: :squint: :squint: |
that's got hipster written all over it
|
:nod:
|
I'd buy it. :ponder:
|
I mean uh... I'd need to see sample images first. :nod:
|
Srika, the price is $300.
Would you still but it now? |
I saw the price. It really depends on the image quality.
|
I think I have a problem. I always feel like buying new cameras. :(
|
:rofl:
i know how you feel :whyme: |
wait, that's a problem?? :D
|
Originally Posted by Mizouse
(Post 14249620)
:rofl:
i know how you feel :whyme:
Originally Posted by is300eater
(Post 14249621)
wait, that's a problem?? :D
:cry: |
:rofl:
|
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/991...st-impressions
Canon Powershot N first impressions By Andy Westlake | Published Jan 7, 2013 | Product Reviews & Previews Understanding the Canon PowerShot N The tiny PowerShot N, with its either-way-up design, tilting touchscreen and round-lens shutter and zoom controls, is one of the most interesting cameras to turn up at CES 2013. Of all the myriad of compact cameras announced at the CES trade show in Las Vegas at the start of 2013, the Canon PowerShot N is sure to be one of the most interesting. Not because of its photographic feature set or appeal to enthusiasts - at heart it's a fully-automated point-and-shoot - but because of its unique design and overall philosophy, and what this says about the way mass-market photography is going. It's no great secret that the conventional point-and-shoot camera market appears to be in terminal decline. The ever-increasing capability of smartphone cameras means that they're more than good enough for the vast majority of casual users, while their internet connectivity makes it easy to share pictures with the rest of the world the moment they're taken. Throw in the current popularity of Instagram, with its emphasis on the use of 'artistic' image processing filters and community sharing, and it's little wonder that people are deserting the pocket camera in droves. Why carry a small camera when you're taking your phone anyway, and it does what you want better? Because of this, the traditional camera manufacturers are having to rethink their approach. It's clear that compact cameras have to offer some compelling advantage over smartphones to persuade buyers to part with their money. This has generally meant zoom lens range or features, as in superzoom 'bridge' cameras or high-end enthusiast compacts, both of which have continued to do relatively well. But with the Powershot N, Canon has gambled on something very different - creativity and fun. So what's the PowerShot N all about? In essence, the PowerShot N is best seen as a smartphone companion for the Instagram generation. With its flip-up touchscreen, and unconventional zoom and shutter controls that work equally well when the camera is held upside-down, it's designed to encourage shooting at unusual angles. It has built-in Wi-Fi for uploading images to social media, either by direct connection to a hot-spot, or via a smartphone or tablet. It's also very small and easy to slip into a pocket when going out. But perhaps most tellingly its all-new 'Creative Shot' mode, which takes the concept of creative processing filters further than we've ever seen before, is turned on by default. Canon's marketing tagline is 'Creativity with a Twist', and it's very apt. Obviously the PowerShot N has to offer something smartphones don't, and that's provided by its 28-224mm equivalent 8x optical zoom lens and 12MP 1/2.3"-type sensor (~6.2 x 4.6mm), that's larger than those used in most phones. In combination with the Digic 5 processor, this promises better image quality and much greater compositional flexibility than you'll get from a phone camera. Body and Design The PowerShot N is an unusual design to say the least, as emphasized by these front and rear views. The back of the camera has no buttons, just a tilting capacitive touchscreen that's the primary interface, just like a smartphone. There are three small buttons on the sides - the power switch, playback button, and a dedicated button to connect to your phone by Wi-Fi - and a little switch to select between normal shooting and 'Creative Shot' mode. There's nothing on the top plate at all, not even a shutter release. The front of the camera is dominated by the 8x zoom lens, and the two silver rings encircling it turn out to be the zoom controller and shutter button. There's a little LED flash on the top right of the camera too. The slimline ring close to the body is a fairly conventional zoom controller - press one way to zoom in, the other to zoom out. The thicker ring is the shutter release, and despite its decidedly unconventional design it offers the usual action - half press down to focus, full press to take a picture. What's unique about the PowerShot N is that this design is symmetrical - the shutter button offers exactly the same action when pressed from the underside of the camera. It may look like a crazy idea, but it really does work. When you first pick up the N, this design is slightly bewildering - without the familiar position of the shutter button, it's not immediately clear how to hold it and take pictures. But after a couple of minutes playing with it, everything really makes sense - this is a design that works remarkably well, allowing you to shoot at unusual angles using just one hand (of course a wrist strap will make sense too). It's definitely a camera you have to handle to appreciate. Creative Shot mode Creative Shot is an all-new mode that takes the concept of creative filters beyond anything we've seen before. Rather than simply applying a series of filters directly to your original shots, it starts by taking a series of bracketed exposures, which according to Canon can include either exposure or focus bracketing. It then not only adds processing filters, but can also select different crops, and even at times rotate the image before cropping (this appears to apply mainly to faces). It'll select five filters out of a broad range, so you never know exactly what you're going to get - there's an element of Lomography here. Thankfully the camera always saves your original too. The examples below (kindly provided to us by Canon EU) give some idea of how this works. The camera's produced five variants on the original image, applying different filters to the bracketed exposures, and in three cases selecting different square crops. It's definitely interesting, even if it may not necessarily be to every purist's taste. Original shot Filtered version 1 Filtered version 2 Filtered version 3 Filtered version 4 Filtered version 5 Summary and First Impressions When digital cameras first arrived on the scene, the freedom from the constraints of film camera layout resulted in lots of design experimentation. The articulated screens on Canon's own G-series, like Nikon's classic twist-body Coolpixes, encouraged shooting from different angles. But after a few years everything settled back down again, and if you walk into a camera shop now, most of the compacts on the shelf will look little different in basic design to film cameras such as Canon's classic APS film Ixus II. Inertia can be a powerful thing. The PowerShot N reminds us again that cameras don't necessarily have to follow these conventional lines, and alternative designs can work really well. It may look like it shouldn't work, but it genuinely does. Whether it truly offers something sufficiently interesting to attract buyers who've been having fun with Instagram on their smartphone, but wouldn't call themselves 'photographers', remains to be seen. But it's certainly refreshing to see Canon trying something a little different. |
ummmm I think the T5i was just announced :poke: @Miz
|
As well as the Canon EOS Rebel SL1, which seem to be the same, but smaller...
|
|
|
I have been using t4i's for the last 3 weeks now...anything smaller is made for who? midgets?
They are freaking toy cameras...but I have been able to get some good results. |
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 14383427)
I have been using t4i's for the last 3 weeks now...anything smaller is made for who? midgets?
They are freaking toy cameras...but I have been able to get some good results. |
Originally Posted by is300eater
(Post 14383432)
why the T4i? Work?
They do the job, and I like them WAAAAY better than the ultra POS t3i. but I can still work faster on a 7D, 5D, or my Nikon...and I'm pretty quick with these...they just limit finite control to the touch screen. |
Originally Posted by is300eater
(Post 14383395)
ummmm I think the T5i was just announced :poke: @Miz
|
|
$650 body only :shrug:
|
<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CJ5KiXA6Qrk?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Again i don't see what is canon thinking. are they going for the "this camera is cute because it can fit in my purse crowd?" :whyme:
|
what ive read around is that their eos-m isnt doing well. so they figured they'd make a super small DSLR since they think that is what people want in a mirrorless camera. :dunno:
if the price was a tad lower, i may consider it as a vacation camera. |
Originally Posted by asianspec
(Post 14383479)
Again i don't see what is canon thinking. are they going for the "this camera is cute because it can fit in my purse crowd?" :whyme:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands