C&P Random Thread -
#7601
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
I haven't used the Fuji wifi capabilities but the ones for Sony and Canon sucks.
#7602
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Interesting that it didnt work with the 5D3 as that is a eye-fi connected camera.
How far were you trying to transmit the photos
Are you sure it was transmitting jpeg and not raw?
I know when I link it to my phone in my pocket or ipad in my backpack it's quick.
Maybe next time setup a wifi network?
How far were you trying to transmit the photos
Are you sure it was transmitting jpeg and not raw?
I know when I link it to my phone in my pocket or ipad in my backpack it's quick.
Maybe next time setup a wifi network?
I thought about getting one of those wifi cards and looked into the eyefi and transcend models. I read so many cons I just ended up getting a regular/fast 16GB SD. My MBP has an SD reader built-in so the only thing I'm losing out on are transfers to the phone - not a big deal for me.
nice, hopefully the 5D4 will have wifi.
#7603
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#7604
The XE-2, just allows you transferring images, hoping for a firmware update to change this. The XT-1 allows to transfer images, as well as control your camera, to fire the shutter!! I haven't fully explored this function yet.
I almost spent $300 on a CamRanger two years, glad it didn't!
I almost spent $300 on a CamRanger two years, glad it didn't!
#7605
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
#7606
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
so like a first-gen thing. annoying.
#7607
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
Yea pretty much.
#7608
I shoot people
trying out DxO Optics Pro 9 program (free for a month), mainly because I'm reading that it does the best in noise reduction... and I have to say, I'm rather impressed, but good lord, it took 13 minutes to export ONE photo I have a 2010 MBP... but still not sure if I have the patience for that
feel free to pixel peep, the biggest difference is the noise in the books in the bookshelves
ISO6400 NO PP
test shot @ISO6400 by trainerKEN., on Flickr
PP'd in Lightroom 5, using Noise Reduction and increasing the shadows slider
pp'd in Lightroom 5 by trainerKEN., on Flickr
PP'd in DxO Optical Pro 9 using the "Prime" Noise Reduction and "Smart Lighting" tool
pp'd in DxO Optics Pro 9 by trainerKEN., on Flickr
feel free to pixel peep, the biggest difference is the noise in the books in the bookshelves
ISO6400 NO PP
test shot @ISO6400 by trainerKEN., on Flickr
PP'd in Lightroom 5, using Noise Reduction and increasing the shadows slider
pp'd in Lightroom 5 by trainerKEN., on Flickr
PP'd in DxO Optical Pro 9 using the "Prime" Noise Reduction and "Smart Lighting" tool
pp'd in DxO Optics Pro 9 by trainerKEN., on Flickr
Last edited by is300eater; 04-22-2014 at 03:11 AM.
#7609
Drifting
It's certainly a big difference in approach to noise reduction. The blotches in the dx0 image bother me a bit though. The bottom right corner is kinda fubar, to the point where I prefer the non PP image.
#7610
Looks pretty good, put up it against Topaz Labs DeNosie, you can d/l free 30 days as well.
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (04-22-2014)
#7611
I shoot people
for you guys into studio portraits (or just getting into it), I can tell this is going to be good and worth the money
http://fstoppers.com/sneak-peak-of-p...-face-tutorial
http://fstoppers.com/sneak-peak-of-p...-face-tutorial
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (04-28-2014)
#7612
Senior Moderator
#7613
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
Awesome video.
#7614
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Anyone on 500pxPrime, they are asking for submissions of busy street photos that car manufacturer can purchase to insert their cars into:
http://us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...f&e=ae7b9ca37b
http://us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...f&e=ae7b9ca37b
#7615
I shoot people
it cracks me up how people will approach me to shoot their wedding (on a budget), where they are practically offering peanuts for payment... and since I don't do photography for money, I've told them I can do it just for experience, I even offered to put up my photo booth setup (that people charge as much as $900 for that alone), she then asked to see my "portfolio"... and when I told her I don't really have one, I just stuff on Flickr all of a sudden they lose interest...
Wow, seriously? I don't get people, they're basically offering next to nothing, and they're going to be picky?? lol
Wow, seriously? I don't get people, they're basically offering next to nothing, and they're going to be picky?? lol
#7616
My first Avatar....
it cracks me up how people will approach me to shoot their wedding (on a budget), where they are practically offering peanuts for payment... and since I don't do photography for money, I've told them I can do it just for experience, I even offered to put up my photo booth setup (that people charge as much as $900 for that alone), she then asked to see my "portfolio"... and when I told her I don't really have one, I just stuff on Flickr all of a sudden they lose interest...
Wow, seriously? I don't get people, they're basically offering next to nothing, and they're going to be picky?? lol
Wow, seriously? I don't get people, they're basically offering next to nothing, and they're going to be picky?? lol
Let them go price some working wedding photographers...I'd like to be there when they here the prices.
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (05-06-2014)
#7617
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
Anyone on 500pxPrime, they are asking for submissions of busy street photos that car manufacturer can purchase to insert their cars into:
http://us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...f&e=ae7b9ca37b
http://us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...f&e=ae7b9ca37b
Anyways I can do that easily being in London..
#7618
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Panny GH4 wow!
http://nofilmschool.com/2014/05/4k-c...4-red-epic-mx/
http://nofilmschool.com/2014/05/4k-c...4-red-epic-mx/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kwMWb2KPB4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IeWEvf5UTI
4K Camera Showdown: Is the Under $2K Panasonic GH4 Sharper Than a $20K+ RED EPIC?
Joe Marine 05.5.14 @ 2:36PM Tags : 5dmarkiii, canon, canon5dmarkiii, gh4, lukeneumann, magiclanternrawvideo, panasonic, panasonicgh4, red, redepic
The Panasonic GH4 is barely on the market yet, and while we’ve seen some comparisons, some have been with cameras that aren’t shooting 4K. But what about comparing the $1,700 4K GH4 to the 5K RED EPIC MX (non-DRAGON), which runs well over $20K for a working body? That’s what Luke Neumann did, and he threw in the Canon 5D Mark III shooting Magic Lantern RAW for good measure, upscaled to 4K to keep everything consistent. Can a cheap camera really look sharper than a pro cine camera?
[Update 2] Luke also did an additional test with the GH4 and EPIC which you can download here. As I mentioned below, the Panasonic is doing a lot of processing internally, even if you turn down sharpness, which he did with the second test. The EPIC, on the other hand, does essentially nothing to the image, meaning there is no additional sharpening going on in the hardware. You can always add sharpening in post to the EPIC, which should bring it closer to the GH4, but the images still speak for themselves.
[Update] Luke also shot this video with only the GH4:
What’s Going on Here?
There is no problem with the focus of the lens (it’s also stopped down where it should perform better), and Luke has actually uploaded samples so you can check them out without YouTube compression. First things first, Luke owns that EPIC, and I also own a RED, and we both own cameras of all brands — basically we don’t care what comes out on top in the end.
<hr class="oio-clear-left">
There is a huge difference between resolved detailed and perceived sharpness. Images can look very sharp because of edge enhancement (or high contrast), but may not actually be recording that much fine detail. Essentially there is an infinite amount of detail in the visible world, and how well a camera system reproduces this fine detail up to their pixel count is talked about in terms of resolved detail. A number of factors can affect resolved detail, including the lens, and the filter over the sensor (optical low-pass filter) that prevents aliasing or false details from showing up in the image as a rainbow pattern.
Nearly all color CMOS camera sensors (essentially most cameras you’re using), have what’s called a Bayer pattern:
If you look at a straight Bayer pattern image it looks terrible, and so in processing this pattern must be interpolated with surrounding pixels to make an image that looks like the scene you were shooting. This means that the image coming into the camera can’t be translated 1:1 with your final image, and thus you’re losing some resolved detail having to Debayer the image and interpolate. The best Debayering algorithms can reproduce about 75-80% of the detail of whatever your initial resolution is, meaning a 4K color sensor can never actually resolve 4K detail, but 5K should come closer. This is also why 4K downscaled to 1080p looks good, because you’re sampling from many more pixels, and the whole system is already resolving well over 1080p.
Yes, the Panasonic GH4 Looks Sharper
Cameras that shoot RAW video, like the RED EPIC and 5D3 Magic Lantern RAW, do minimal processing internally to the image. Some has to be done to actually give you a clean image out of the box and remove fixed-pattern noise, but for the most part RAW is left to post. The Panasonic GH4, on the other hand, is a highly compressed camera, and it aims to give you the best possible image right to the card in the camera. This means it’s doing a lot more processing, which includes internal sharpening.
Is it actually resolving more detail at 4K compared to the RED’s 5K downsampled to 4K? It may very well be, and regardless of what you can do in post to an image, the vast majority like something that looks nice right out of the box. Could you sharpen the 5D Mark III and RED to look more like the Panasonic? Possibly, but in the end, for many people, the camera that costs the least, looks “the best,” and requires the least amount of work to get to a satisfactory image might be the one they favor, especially if it’s stuff going to the web where there may only be the slightest difference between a $2,000 camera and a $100,000 camera thanks to all sorts of factors like compression and screen resolution.
In the end, there are many factors that affect image quality, and resolved detail/sharpness is just one of them. There are plenty of others like color, dynamic range, motion rendering, etc. Each of these cameras has their own unique look, and they also have their own usability differences, which are often more important than the image, and are why one camera might be right for one job while another is not.
The test above shows that Panasonic is pushing as much detail as possible through this new 4K sensor, and with minimal correction, it stands up next to a camera that costs 10 times as much. Granted, the MX sensor is quite a few years old at this point, and DRAGON likely performs better, but we have now reached a point where you can get 80-90% of the overall quality of those high-end cameras for a fraction of the cost.
Links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IeWEvf5UTI
4K Camera Showdown: Is the Under $2K Panasonic GH4 Sharper Than a $20K+ RED EPIC?
Joe Marine 05.5.14 @ 2:36PM Tags : 5dmarkiii, canon, canon5dmarkiii, gh4, lukeneumann, magiclanternrawvideo, panasonic, panasonicgh4, red, redepic
The Panasonic GH4 is barely on the market yet, and while we’ve seen some comparisons, some have been with cameras that aren’t shooting 4K. But what about comparing the $1,700 4K GH4 to the 5K RED EPIC MX (non-DRAGON), which runs well over $20K for a working body? That’s what Luke Neumann did, and he threw in the Canon 5D Mark III shooting Magic Lantern RAW for good measure, upscaled to 4K to keep everything consistent. Can a cheap camera really look sharper than a pro cine camera?
[Update 2] Luke also did an additional test with the GH4 and EPIC which you can download here. As I mentioned below, the Panasonic is doing a lot of processing internally, even if you turn down sharpness, which he did with the second test. The EPIC, on the other hand, does essentially nothing to the image, meaning there is no additional sharpening going on in the hardware. You can always add sharpening in post to the EPIC, which should bring it closer to the GH4, but the images still speak for themselves.
GH4
Nikkor Ai-s 50mm f 1.2 @ f 5.6
Shutter at 180
CineLikeD: Contrast and Saturation to -5, Sharpness to -2
RED Epic
Nikkor Ai-s 50mm f 1.2 @ f 5.6
5K/FF/3:1
RedLogFilm: Contrast and white balance adjusted to match GH4 as close as possible.
This is a still from the new test (click for larger), which has been blown up to 400%:Nikkor Ai-s 50mm f 1.2 @ f 5.6
Shutter at 180
CineLikeD: Contrast and Saturation to -5, Sharpness to -2
RED Epic
Nikkor Ai-s 50mm f 1.2 @ f 5.6
5K/FF/3:1
RedLogFilm: Contrast and white balance adjusted to match GH4 as close as possible.
[Update] Luke also shot this video with only the GH4:
What’s Going on Here?
There is no problem with the focus of the lens (it’s also stopped down where it should perform better), and Luke has actually uploaded samples so you can check them out without YouTube compression. First things first, Luke owns that EPIC, and I also own a RED, and we both own cameras of all brands — basically we don’t care what comes out on top in the end.
<hr class="oio-clear-left">
There is a huge difference between resolved detailed and perceived sharpness. Images can look very sharp because of edge enhancement (or high contrast), but may not actually be recording that much fine detail. Essentially there is an infinite amount of detail in the visible world, and how well a camera system reproduces this fine detail up to their pixel count is talked about in terms of resolved detail. A number of factors can affect resolved detail, including the lens, and the filter over the sensor (optical low-pass filter) that prevents aliasing or false details from showing up in the image as a rainbow pattern.
Nearly all color CMOS camera sensors (essentially most cameras you’re using), have what’s called a Bayer pattern:
If you look at a straight Bayer pattern image it looks terrible, and so in processing this pattern must be interpolated with surrounding pixels to make an image that looks like the scene you were shooting. This means that the image coming into the camera can’t be translated 1:1 with your final image, and thus you’re losing some resolved detail having to Debayer the image and interpolate. The best Debayering algorithms can reproduce about 75-80% of the detail of whatever your initial resolution is, meaning a 4K color sensor can never actually resolve 4K detail, but 5K should come closer. This is also why 4K downscaled to 1080p looks good, because you’re sampling from many more pixels, and the whole system is already resolving well over 1080p.
Yes, the Panasonic GH4 Looks Sharper
Cameras that shoot RAW video, like the RED EPIC and 5D3 Magic Lantern RAW, do minimal processing internally to the image. Some has to be done to actually give you a clean image out of the box and remove fixed-pattern noise, but for the most part RAW is left to post. The Panasonic GH4, on the other hand, is a highly compressed camera, and it aims to give you the best possible image right to the card in the camera. This means it’s doing a lot more processing, which includes internal sharpening.
Is it actually resolving more detail at 4K compared to the RED’s 5K downsampled to 4K? It may very well be, and regardless of what you can do in post to an image, the vast majority like something that looks nice right out of the box. Could you sharpen the 5D Mark III and RED to look more like the Panasonic? Possibly, but in the end, for many people, the camera that costs the least, looks “the best,” and requires the least amount of work to get to a satisfactory image might be the one they favor, especially if it’s stuff going to the web where there may only be the slightest difference between a $2,000 camera and a $100,000 camera thanks to all sorts of factors like compression and screen resolution.
In the end, there are many factors that affect image quality, and resolved detail/sharpness is just one of them. There are plenty of others like color, dynamic range, motion rendering, etc. Each of these cameras has their own unique look, and they also have their own usability differences, which are often more important than the image, and are why one camera might be right for one job while another is not.
The test above shows that Panasonic is pushing as much detail as possible through this new 4K sensor, and with minimal correction, it stands up next to a camera that costs 10 times as much. Granted, the MX sensor is quite a few years old at this point, and DRAGON likely performs better, but we have now reached a point where you can get 80-90% of the overall quality of those high-end cameras for a fraction of the cost.
Links:
#7620
I shoot people
got this email from someone through Flickr, not sure how to proceed... the cynical side of me is thinking it's a scam. What do you guys think?
Hi trainerKEN., your photos are amazing.
I want to buy several of your photos for my page related to art, would you be interested? I can offer a long-lasting cooperation, I usually pay $60-$70 for every picture
If interested, please drop me a line to sergioxxxxxxxx@gmail.com because I don't visit Flickr too often.
I want to buy several of your photos for my page related to art, would you be interested? I can offer a long-lasting cooperation, I usually pay $60-$70 for every picture
If interested, please drop me a line to sergioxxxxxxxx@gmail.com because I don't visit Flickr too often.
#7621
Do they have a Flickr page as well?
Are you on 500px?
http://support.500px.com/customer/po...-what-do-i-do-
Are you on 500px?
http://support.500px.com/customer/po...-what-do-i-do-
#7622
I shoot people
Do they have a Flickr page as well?
Are you on 500px?
http://support.500px.com/customer/po...-what-do-i-do-
Are you on 500px?
http://support.500px.com/customer/po...-what-do-i-do-
https://www.flickr.com/people/123645456@N03/
and yes, I have 500px... I always forget people can buy stuff through them, thanks
#7623
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I just got this email, lol.... I don't know, it smells funny, but, you never know, it could have some purpose. I think I will e-mail from a different account and see if there's any potential.
compare with Ken's
Hi Ross, thank you for sharing your art.
Would you be interested in selling several of your pics for my website related to digital art? I can offer a regular partnership, I usually offer $80 per image
If you're interested, please email me at sergioxxxxx@gmail.com because I'm not visiting messages at Flickr on a regular basis.
Would you be interested in selling several of your pics for my website related to digital art? I can offer a regular partnership, I usually offer $80 per image
If you're interested, please email me at sergioxxxxx@gmail.com because I'm not visiting messages at Flickr on a regular basis.
Hi trainerKEN., your photos are amazing.
I want to buy several of your photos for my page related to art, would you be interested? I can offer a long-lasting cooperation, I usually pay $60-$70 for every picture
If interested, please drop me a line to sergioxxxxxxxx@gmail.com because I don't visit Flickr too often.
I want to buy several of your photos for my page related to art, would you be interested? I can offer a long-lasting cooperation, I usually pay $60-$70 for every picture
If interested, please drop me a line to sergioxxxxxxxx@gmail.com because I don't visit Flickr too often.
#7624
I shoot people
#7625
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
well what I mean is, it's a canned message with the words changed... that is kind of a red flag in terms of legit-ness -
#7626
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
I got the exact same message on Flickr mail today as well. My price was $75 per image. Other than that, it was the same message.
I smell spam bot.
I smell spam bot.
#7627
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
#7628
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I got another email today asking to buy photos for selling on greeting cards. It might be an epidemic going around.
#7629
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,122
Received 4,824 Likes
on
2,571 Posts
BUT this article makes assumptions and statements that I don't agree with. There is a reason the RED...and the Alexa...and the F65...Blackmagic...etc etc etc don't do internal sharpening...and hardly any is even added in post. Because internal sharpening is pure video garbage, its from ENG camera shooters for TV and still photographers turned video shooters (because its what HDSLRs do, too)
Its not to say those cameras don't produce wonderful images...But that sharpness (video curse) takes away the more "soft" filmic quality that is more reminiscent of celluloid. Its really just more appealing to the eye, something that a screen grab can't convey.
So the GH4, much like a 5D, 7D, D800, etc is designed to convey the "best" possible end image based on their criteria. If a professional cinematographer had had input when the software for these cameras was being written, I can bet you money the choice to have the detailing turn totally off would have been added...along with Log C (much like the upcoming a7s will offer)
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (05-11-2014)
#7630
Needs more Lemon Pledge
finally broke 90 pulse on 500px for a picture!
The following 4 users liked this post by stogie1020:
#7632
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
#7633
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
How about this one?
They don't talk about prices, releases, tax implications, etc (while Getty and others do).
Weird.
You take beautiful, authentic photos and I'd love to add some of your Flickr photos to CrowdMedia's collection in a profile made just for you, with your copyright and your attribution.
CrowdMedia is a new place where thousands of photographers like you reveal how they see our world and get their photos discovered by publishers.
To help you get more visibility, we might push some of your photos to editorial publishers (no commercial use).
If they select your photo, they pay a fee and we share half the revenue with you through Paypal. There is no work for you, we take care of everything.
You automatically get a link back to your Flickr with your CrowdMedia profile. And you can add a link to your personal website as well in your CrowdMedia profile.
It is always free for photographers. There is no obligation. You can opt-out when you want in 2 clicks.
If you want to try, all you have to do is answer Yes and I will send your photos’ link in crowdmedia.co when it is done.
CrowdMedia is a new place where thousands of photographers like you reveal how they see our world and get their photos discovered by publishers.
To help you get more visibility, we might push some of your photos to editorial publishers (no commercial use).
If they select your photo, they pay a fee and we share half the revenue with you through Paypal. There is no work for you, we take care of everything.
You automatically get a link back to your Flickr with your CrowdMedia profile. And you can add a link to your personal website as well in your CrowdMedia profile.
It is always free for photographers. There is no obligation. You can opt-out when you want in 2 clicks.
If you want to try, all you have to do is answer Yes and I will send your photos’ link in crowdmedia.co when it is done.
Weird.
#7634
Needs more Lemon Pledge
#7635
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
#7636
Earth-bound misfit
#7637
Needs more Lemon Pledge
I didn't want to double post (it's on the last page of the Favorite pics YOU have taken thread), it's the rainbow eucalyptus bark shot.
The following users liked this post:
wndrlst (05-12-2014)
#7638
Earth-bound misfit
Oh nice! I envy that you got to see one. Was that in HI?
#7639
Needs more Lemon Pledge
#7640
Earth-bound misfit