Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

C&P Random Thread -

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 07:00 PM
  #3601  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Global Fallout of Thai floods



http://www.nationmultimedia.com/busi...-30167951.html
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #3602  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,119
Likes: 3,366
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Sux for Nikon and Sony. Well except for the stuff they still make in Japan.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 08:42 PM
  #3603  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 3,676
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Sux for Nikon and Sony. Well except for the stuff they still make in Japan.
For Sony, there isn't a whole lot left made in Japan

except maybe the Zeiss and G lenses
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 11:10 PM
  #3604  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
am I crazy for being interested in this cam... .?

http://www.popphoto.com/gear/2011/09...ng-aps-c-dslrs

Camera Test: Sony's A77 Is The New King of APS-C DSLRs

The other guys should be worried
  • By Philip Ryan on September 22, 2011


Photo: Satoshi (Camera); Philip Ryan (LCD)
Enlarge



Enlarge


Enlarge


Gallery Preview


<table class="views-view-grid"> <tbody> <tr class="row-1 row-first"> <td class="col-1">
</td> <td class="col-2">
</td> </tr> <tr class="row-2 row-last"> <td class="col-1">
</td> <td class="col-2">
</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
See Gallery


Test Results


Enlarge


When we named Sony's Alpha 55 Camera of the Year last year, we didn't expect that the company would come along with a model like the new Alpha 77. In addition to the benefits we loved in the A55, such as full-time phase-detection autofocus even when recording video, Sony has added a slew of features for this flagship fixed-mirror DSLR. With all of this new technology, we were eager to get it into the Popular Photography Test Lab. Now that we have, we can tell you that the results should make Canon and Nikon worry.
The A77 sports a new 24.3MP Exmor APS-C sized sensor, the world's first OLED electronic viewfinder in a DSLR, and a 3-inch 921,600-dot LCD monitor that flips down and swivels -- mounted on an armature that lets it extend away from the body and rise up, so that you can face it forward for self-portraits. Oh, and it also includes all the whiz-bang features that Sony has been building into all of its cameras lately, such as Auto HDR, which combines three shots of different exposures to expand the dynamic range of the resulting image; Handheld Twilight, which combines six low-light shots in order to reduce noise; and Sweep Panorama, which stitches together slivers of many exposures for a super-wide panorama.
The price for all of this? Body only, the A77 sells for $1,400. That's about $200 less than Canon's EOS 7D and Nikon's D300s.
IN THE LAB
The A77 earned an overall image-quality rating of Excellent from its lowest sensitivity of ISO 50 through ISO 400. At the heart of this assessment is the camera's Excellent rating in our resolution test, where it turned in 2770 lines per picture height. Compare that with the 18MP Canon 7D's 2610 lines or the 12.3MP Nikon D300s's 2340 lines, both at their lowest ISO settings of ISO 100.
Given that the Sony has so many more pixels than either of those cameras, you'd be right to expect even more resolving power, but Sony usually doesn't push hard to boost resolution. The A77 does hold a lot of its resolving power as ISO rises, though. At ISO 400, it barely dropped to 2720, while at ISO 1600 it held at 2620 lines. At its top sensitivity of ISO 16,000, where noise was quite high, resolution dropped significantly to 2060 lines. Interestingly, images at that ISO are still easily usable if printed at small sizes.
In our noise test, the A77 maintained a Low or better rating up to ISO 400 and retained acceptable noise ratings up through ISO 1600. That might not sound like much, but note that the Canon 7D's noise also exceeded a Low rating above ISO 400, while Nikon's D300s eked out one more stop, up to ISO 800. The Nikon also became Unacceptable above ISO 1600, but the Canon didn't reach Unacceptable territory until ISO 12,800. That's the main advantage the 7D can claim over A77.
Color accuracy is Excellent in the Sony with an average Delta E of 7.2. That's essentially equal to the Canon's 7.0 and also very close to Nikon's 6.8.
Despite the likelihood that most people will pay more attention to the A77's other features, its autofocus is what really stood out the most in our lab tests. It focused in a mere 0.24 sec at the brightest part of the test and remained under 0.3 sec down to EV 8. At EV 2, which is dimmer than most people's living rooms, the A77 focus in 0.51 sec. And at EV -1, the lowest light level for which the AF system is rated, the camera was able to focus in 0.98 sec.
How does that compare? The EOS 7D was able to focus at EV -2, but at all other light levels in our test, it was slower than the Sony. Nikon's D300s was able to focus in 0.93 sec at EV -1, but as with the Canon, Sony's A77 proved faster at all other light levels.
Then there's the image stabilization. Since the A77 shifts the sensor to combat hand shake, it's effective with any lens you mount on the camera. Canon and Nikon both use lens-based IS, which means that you have to buy special lenses to get the benefit of stabilization. In our lab, the A77's shifting sensor was able to provide our test shooters with an average of 2.5 stops of handholding leeway.

IN THE FIELD
The A77 is the best-designed transmissive-mirror body Sony has made to date. The grip is long enough to fit all of your fingers comfortably, and contoured to allow a solid handle on the camera. Hard buttons abound for quick access to essential functions, and most are logically placed. The joystick control on back provides a nice way to set focusing points and navigate through the menus, while taking up significantly less real estate on the back of the camera. Meanwhile, a pair of command wheels make quick work of changing shutter speed and aperture, as is appropriate for a camera of this class.
If we have one complaint about the control layout, it's that the movie recording button is a bit far from the designated resting place for your thumb. It would make more sense to us to put the movie button where the autoexposure lock (AEL) button is, move that to where the AF/MF button is, and move the AF/MF button, which can be assigned to any of the 28 different functions, to the movie button's current location. Then both the movie and AEL buttons would be more readily accessible.
The main menus are well-defined with icons, though it's funny that the memory-card icon remains in the shape of old-style Memory Sticks. The Function button allows access to the most commonly used settings that run down the sides of the LCD screen. One of the nicer things Sony has done is to let you jump directly across the screen for faster navigation. Also, in the submenus, if an item can be adjusted, such as the level of Auto HDR effect, you can use the left and right directions of the joystick to set those without having to dive into the main menus. This all combines into one of the most thoughtfully designed non-touchscreen interfaces we've seen to date.
The system's biggest drawback is that, at times during our field testing, it was a tad sluggish to move from one screen to the next or for some control changes to take effect. We imagine that further firmware upgrades will smooth this out.
As mentioned earlier, the A77's EVF is one of the most amazing things you'll find in this camera, and is also likely to be one of the more controversial. We were well aware that we weren't shooting with an optical finder, and this feeling didn't go away even with extensive field testing. However, the EVF is of such high resolution (thanks, in part, to each dot creating mixtures of red, green, and blue rather than requiring separate RGB dots, as LCDs do) that the experience was just as pleasing as shooting with an optical finder, though each technology has its own advantages.
The main problem we saw with the EVF compared with an optical finder is that the EVF isn't always on. If it were, it would be a major drain on the battery, so it makes sense that the sensor near the finder activates it when you raise the camera to your eye. However, there were times that the sensor was inadvertently tripped while we wanted to change settings using the LCD. At other times, the EVF took too long to turn on, and we were left waiting before we could frame our shot. This didn't happen often, but the few times it did happen left us a bit annoyed.
Burst shooters should be pleased with the A77's capabilities. It has a 12-fps mode for really fast bursts, but in that setting your lens won't stop down -- you'll have to shoot at the lens's maximum aperture. This shouldn't be a problem for sports photographers, who routinely shoot at maximum aperture for faster shutter speeds.
If you want smaller apertures, the A77's regular continuous-drive mode can shoot at up to 8 frames per second (same as Canon's 7D, and Nikon's D300s when the vertical grip is attached). And the camera's subject-tracking AF does an exemplary job of keeping up with moving subjects, partially due to the fact that the mirror doesn't flip up and down, interrupting the AF signal. No matter what burst mode you're in, the buffer will hold up to 11 RAW + JPEG shots, or 13 RAW or full-sized extra-fine JPEG shots per burst. Both the Canon and Nikon shoot more per burst, especially for JPEGs.
Video shooters should be pleased with the footage from the A77, which can shoot at up to 60-fps at 1920x1080p, the new limit of the AVCHD format. As with Sony's other transmissive mirror cameras, the A77 has fast phase-detection AF even as you record video, putting it ahead of any other video-capable DSLR.
BOTTOM LINE
Sony has, once again, radically changed the world of DSLRs with its A77. Plus, it has done so without compromises in the shooting experience or in image quality. The A77 now reigns supreme over APS-C format DSLRs. Neither Canon's EOS 7D nor Nikon's D300s can match the A77's AF speed or resolution. While the Canon 7D does beat the A77 in its noise performance and holds more resolution at the highest ISOs, the A77 ultimately beats it for the overall package, including the video-shooting experience and the versatility of the articulated LCD.
Seasoned photographers with extensive lens collections will likely have a hard time deciding if they should switch to Sony, especially if they've taken up video seriously. If this describes you, we'd advise you wait and see how Canon and Nikon react to the A77 before making up your mind.
We have to admit that we see this as a serious shakeup in the camera industry. For the first time, a camera without an optical finder can deliver the level of performance that we've all come to expect from an eye-level framing device. Furthermore, you can use it to shoot video, change menu settings, and overlay a variety of gridlines, even a leveling indicator.
Add to that that the A77 can match the burst capabilities of its competitors, while offering a limited 12-fps burst mode. Plus, the camera has the best automatic panorama stitching we've seen, and the Handheld Twilight mode significantly reduces noise in low-light images of still subjects.
For years now Sony has been merging its consumer electronics expertise with the DSLR-making knowledge it acquired with its purchase of Konica Minolta. Up until this time, it has paid off chiefly in terms of fancy features such as Auto HDR and Sweep Panorama. But with the A77, we finally get to see Sony's combined expertise change the way we shoot.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 11:27 PM
  #3605  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 3,676
From: Vancouver BC
Got one pre ordered
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #3606  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
what you seriouS? has this alread been covered? you been on us????
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 11:30 PM
  #3607  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
looks like a great cam.. :jesalous:
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 08:17 AM
  #3608  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Looks like a good camera, but that article is from popphoto...
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 12:53 PM
  #3609  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 3,676
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Looks like a good camera, but that article is from popphoto...
yeah, I don't pay much attention to those reviews. I mainly go by the real world feedbacks of the members at Dyxum.com, flickr groups, and dpreview forum.

It's been said the camera has some bugs, but I have no doubt that FW updates will fix or at least help. According to some website testings, 1600ISO isn't as good as they hope to be... but yet, people in forums have posted 1600ISO shots that were just fine

besides, I rarely shoot above 800ISO, and if I have to go 1600ISO LR3 fixes the noise in 2 seconds. And I honestly don't think I've had to go 3200ISO... EVER.


I pre-ordered my a77 back in Sept. and have been on the fence about keeping/canceling. But my sister just told me that she might be treating me and mom to a European trip in 2012. I know I've said a 100 times before about NOT caring for video... but I got to thinking... my dad passed away almost 4 years ago, and I have ONE tiny video clip of him shot with a P&S. While my mom is healthy and will be with us for many years to come... I want to start cherishing moments with stills and videos. If this European trip happens, my a900 AND a77 will be there to capture these priceless moments.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 12:53 PM
  #3610  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
to everyone who hates on swiveling / articulating LCD screens... I present you with Exhibit A

***** graphic human eye macro closeup photo, just a warning so you don't get freaked out*****

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...postcount=2371
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 12:54 PM
  #3611  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Looks like a good camera, but that article is from popphoto...
Originally Posted by is300eater
yeah, I don't pay much attention to those reviews. I mainly go by the real world feedbacks of the members at Dyxum.com, flickr groups, and dpreview forum.

It's been said the camera has some bugs, but I have no doubt that FW updates will fix or at least help. According to some website testings, 1600ISO isn't as good as they hope to be... but yet, people in forums have posted 1600ISO shots that were just fine

besides, I rarely shoot above 800ISO, and if I have to go 1600ISO LR3 fixes the noise in 2 seconds. And I honestly don't think I've had to go 3200ISO... EVER.


I pre-ordered my a77 back in Sept. and have been on the fence about keeping/canceling. But my sister just told me that she might be treating me and mom to a European trip in 2012. I know I've said a 100 times before about NOT caring for video... but I got to thinking... my dad passed away almost 4 years ago, and I have ONE tiny video clip of him shot with a P&S. While my mom is healthy and will be with us for many years to come... I want to start cherishing moments with stills and videos. If this European trip happens, my a900 AND a77 will be there to capture these priceless moments.
yeah, I'm not paying attention the review itself much either, or to the proclamation(s) made in it. Just looking at the specs, features, and price point, it seems like a great camera.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 12:39 AM
  #3612  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 3,676
From: Vancouver BC
"...Nikon SB900 on 1/8 power with 3/4 CTO gel in 50 inch softbox, about 3 ft from subject"
what does the part "..with 3/4 CTO gel" mean?


edit: Okay, Google'd it...I know what the CTO gel means, but what's the 3/4 mean?

Last edited by is300eater; Oct 23, 2011 at 12:43 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #3613  
TRIOD3SIGNS's Avatar
SHAWD 04TL is in
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 29
From: 2
WOW... best camera costume evar!
http://vimeo.com/31062460
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 06:00 PM
  #3614  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
Originally Posted by is300eater
what does the part "..with 3/4 CTO gel" mean?


edit: Okay, Google'd it...I know what the CTO gel means, but what's the 3/4 mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_correction
Gel nomenclature

The main color correction gels are CTB (color temperature blue) and CTO (color temperature orange). A CTB gel converts tungsten light of 3200K to 'daylight' color. A CTO gel performs the reverse.[2] Note that different manufacturers' gels yield slightly different colors. As well, there is no precise definition of the color of daylight since it varies depending on the location (latitude, dust, pollution) and the time of day.

Gels that remove the green cast of fluorescent lights are called minus green. Gels that add a green cast are called plus green.[2] Fractions such as 3/4, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 indicate the strength of a gel. A 1/2 CTO gel is half the strength of a (full) CTO gel.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 06:45 PM
  #3615  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 3,676
From: Vancouver BC
ahhhh Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 11:54 AM
  #3616  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
good read

Automobile Magazine: How They Hire Photographers
http://blog.photoshelter.com/2011/10...agazine-hires/
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 03:38 PM
  #3617  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/con...=7-11666-12056
Carl Zeiss announces Distagon T* 25mm f/2.0 lens for Nikon, Canon
Friday, October 28, 2011 | by Eamon Hickey



Carl Zeiss has announced the Distagon T* 2/25 (25mm f/2.0) lens in ZE (Canon EOS) and ZF.2 (Nikon) mounts. The new manual focus wide-angle lens features two aspheric elements and virtually eliminates chromatic aberration, according to Zeiss.

The Distagon T* 2/25 joins the already available Distagon T* 25mm f/2.8 ZF.2 for Nikon. The new, faster 25mm lens is the first in that focal length made in a Canon mount.

The Distagon T* 2/25 will begin shipping at the end of this year. The suggested list price stated in Carl Zeiss's press release does not specify a region (but is presumably for the EU) and is given only in euros: €1217 (excluding VAT).
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 11:18 AM
  #3618  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Finally here !!! One of my images is being used to promote the online printing company www.bumblejax.com. They started a new service to print Hipstamatic and Instagram images.

http://blog.bumblejax.com/news/new-g...iphone-photos/


http://blog.bumblejax.com/hipstamati...ry-art-prints/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/reverseimage/6140971501/http://www.flickr.com/photos/reverseimage/6140971501/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/reverseimage/, on Flickr
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 12:47 PM
  #3619  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
nicely done! congrats.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 03:37 PM
  #3620  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #3621  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Thanks




Seems like Sandisk has dropped their prices, not sure how long or if they're doing so to get rid of old models. But look at B&H and Adorama. Good prices on Extreme Pro 90mbs 16 and 32 gb cards.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 06:07 PM
  #3622  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
wow... a 32GB for $89. hell there's a 2-pack for $162.

thanks for the tip.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 06:13 PM
  #3623  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Welcome,


Anybody know how to follow "traffic" for flickr? I had about five images get about 200 views total in a single day a few days ago. Just wonder how?

And they were images I took like four years ago, maybe five.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 06:34 PM
  #3624  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
If they are trackable, you should see evidence of that in your stats. But I would think you already looked there. If the data is not there, you can try something like tineye or Who stole my pictures plugin.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 01:22 PM
  #3625  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
just closed my Smugmug account. 17GB of photos uploaded, 1 year and 0 sales. lol. there's just no reason for me to renew a $150 a year service for that.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 01:25 PM
  #3626  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
I don't think they do enough advertising to let people know this service is available. Though I know those who do certain work and direct people to the site themselves.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 01:28 PM
  #3627  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
yeah, I was using it at the latter role, primarily. I was posting photos from private events in password-protected galleries and then sending the links out. I got sh*tloads of views after each event (as expected) but no sales. These days seeing a photo online is enough for most people.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 02:24 PM
  #3628  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Yeah, most I know that use it, use it to get parents to buy, kids activities and such. Maybe send to their parent and see if they buy?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #3629  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
I didn't have any kids events there, it was engagement parties, reunion, bachelorette party, adult things.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 02:31 PM
  #3630  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by srika
I didn't have any kids events there, it was engagement parties, reunion, bachelorette party, adult things.
Yeah, send to their parents, maybe their boy/girlfriends, husbands/wives. Might be an image you could sell for $$$ if they catch someone cheating or something...
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 02:35 PM
  #3631  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
very funny. I don't know any of their parents. and, I'm not in the business of homewrecking.

but the bigger problem is, I already closed the account.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 07:22 PM
  #3632  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
COOL

<object width="853" height="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gHF536TJ0iE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;hd=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gHF536TJ0iE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="853" height="480" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 01:19 AM
  #3633  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 3,676
From: Vancouver BC
just a quick question (too lazy to start a thread/poll)...

how often would you guys say you shoot @1600ISO and above?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 01:50 AM
  #3634  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,119
Likes: 3,366
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Depends in if I'm just trying to get a picture in low light.

Otherwise I don't think very often at all.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 01:52 AM
  #3635  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,119
Likes: 3,366
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Attended a seminar and demo put on by 2 playboy photoographers.

Very informative.

Man some sets they use up to 50 lights
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 01:55 AM
  #3636  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,119
Likes: 3,366
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Also pretty cool the HMI lights, let's you see what you're gonna photograph before you take the pic.
(they're the same kind of lights movies use IIRC)
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 05:35 AM
  #3637  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by is300eater
just a quick question (too lazy to start a thread/poll)...

how often would you guys say you shoot @1600ISO and above?
Was shooting 3200 and 6400 last night. Not too often, but great to have when needed for handholding.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 11:10 AM
  #3638  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,145
Likes: 14,297
I pretty much never go above 1000. I am not a big fan of the type of noise the 7D makes. also, the loss in detail when applying NR bugs the hell out of me.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 12:51 PM
  #3639  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,119
Likes: 3,366
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
I love how these guys are pretty adamant that they don't use photoshop on their photos.

And also they were saying up until 5 years ago they were shooting with a 8x10 for the centerfolds.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #3640  
LKLD's Avatar
I've been Canonized ;)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 31
From: FL
Originally Posted by srika
good read

Automobile Magazine: How They Hire Photographers
http://blog.photoshelter.com/2011/10...agazine-hires/
Insightful article! Especially the photo in the body of an email, not as an attachment and snail-mail postcard tips. Great ideas for some of our car photo enthusiasts.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.