C&P Random Thread -
#7243
#7244
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
oh ok. I thought you were reasoning about whether to get the 6D.
#7246
#7247
I shoot people
anyways, sorry to change the subject... yesterday, my wife and I decided to take a walk into Downtown (Vancouver), while I have the Lowepro Flipside backpack (access to the main area ONLY when the backpack is taken off), it's too big for walk-around, so decided to use my Sling backpack instead... I was in the heart of DT around sunset, a lot of people walking around I was taking street shots... Anyways, we decided to grab something to eat, and low and behold, my zipper was half unzipped, I honestly think someone was trying to get into my bag
#7248
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
anyways, sorry to change the subject... yesterday, my wife and I decided to take a walk into Downtown (Vancouver), while I have the Lowepro Flipside backpack (access to the main area ONLY when the backpack is taken off), it's too big for walk-around, so decided to use my Sling instead... I was in the heart of DT around sunset, a lot of people walking around taking street shots... Anyways, we decided to grab something to eat, and low and behold, my zipper was half unzipped, I honestly think someone was trying to get into my bag
#7249
My first Avatar....
Why can't ether be one perfect body?
#7251
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#7252
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,306
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,991 Posts
#7253
My first Avatar....
#7254
Burning Brakes
So I'm not super big into portraiture but after seeing some of this guys work/lighting I would really like to start. The lighting and halo's in the models eyes really makes the portrait pop imo.
link to some of his work:
http://500px.com/photo/58556020
http://500px.com/DangTran
I also contacted him in regards to what he was using for lighting and he gave me a link
I couldn't find this on the American Amazon site. Have any of you guys heard of this brand? or have you used anything similar? I'm thinking about buying it but I know Uk has different style outlets so I would have to get a converter which I guess isn't a big deal.
link to some of his work:
http://500px.com/photo/58556020
http://500px.com/DangTran
I also contacted him in regards to what he was using for lighting and he gave me a link
I couldn't find this on the American Amazon site. Have any of you guys heard of this brand? or have you used anything similar? I'm thinking about buying it but I know Uk has different style outlets so I would have to get a converter which I guess isn't a big deal.
The following users liked this post:
MattB07TL (01-25-2014)
#7256
Burning Brakes
^ Have you used one
#7258
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
i have one of those LED ones.
it is ok but I kinda don't like the circle reflection in the subject's eyes. it gets on my pet peeves.
it is ok but I kinda don't like the circle reflection in the subject's eyes. it gets on my pet peeves.
#7259
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
So I'm not super big into portraiture but after seeing some of this guys work/lighting I would really like to start. The lighting and halo's in the models eyes really makes the portrait pop imo.
link to some of his work:
http://500px.com/photo/58556020
http://500px.com/DangTran
I also contacted him in regards to what he was using for lighting and he gave me a link
walimex 65W Macro Ring Lamp: Amazon.co.uk: Camera & Photo
I couldn't find this on the American Amazon site. Have any of you guys heard of this brand? or have you used anything similar? I'm thinking about buying it but I know Uk has different style outlets so I would have to get a converter which I guess isn't a big deal.
link to some of his work:
http://500px.com/photo/58556020
http://500px.com/DangTran
I also contacted him in regards to what he was using for lighting and he gave me a link
walimex 65W Macro Ring Lamp: Amazon.co.uk: Camera & Photo
I couldn't find this on the American Amazon site. Have any of you guys heard of this brand? or have you used anything similar? I'm thinking about buying it but I know Uk has different style outlets so I would have to get a converter which I guess isn't a big deal.
those photos look nice too. maybe I've just seen bad examples
#7260
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Been reading a bit more here and there about Kelby's switch to Canon. And it doesn't really seem like he did it because of money. If you watch that video, he talks about how Canon came to him and only wanted him to MENTION their products on his shows, because at the time he would never even mention them as options. Furthermore, he had access to the best equipment Nikon had to offer already - being a pro sports shooter he had the best Nikon bodies and zooms out there. So it's not like Canon could have just given him their bodies and zooms and he would have just dropped everything and ran there because it had filled some void in his life. Also, think about personal preferences and the degree to which we go crazy about this stuff. Do you really think someone at his level would just switch camera systems, on a whim, because the company kinda pushed him on, if he didn't actually LIKE using the equipment?
#7261
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,306
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,991 Posts
The following users liked this post:
MattB07TL (01-25-2014)
#7262
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#7263
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#7264
My first Avatar....
#7265
Did someone glue the legs shut?
#7266
Burning Brakes
There basically exactly the same I just don't know what brand to go with....
Amazon.com: Ardinbir Photography Studio 500W 5400K Fluorescent Ring Lamp Light with Flexible Arm for Studio Lighting, Video taking or Portrait: Camera & Photo
#7268
Living the Dream
While the link worked for me, the pics didn't load very well (damn work firewall bs), so I just googled Vintage Camera Ads
http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/photography-ads
I like Canon's "Wildlife as Canon sees it" ad. Pretty cool way to sell cameras and lenses.
I think my parents still have a mid-80s vintage Canon EOS. May ask them to bring it with them when they come for my sons birthday in a few weeks. Mostly for shits and giggles.
http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/photography-ads
I like Canon's "Wildlife as Canon sees it" ad. Pretty cool way to sell cameras and lenses.
I think my parents still have a mid-80s vintage Canon EOS. May ask them to bring it with them when they come for my sons birthday in a few weeks. Mostly for shits and giggles.
The following users liked this post:
jupitersolo (01-29-2014)
#7269
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
love those ads!
The following users liked this post:
jupitersolo (01-29-2014)
#7270
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Am I the only one?
I stopped receiving the free print edition of Rangefinder magazine. I get the digital edition emailed to me, but I liked the print edition. Guess I can't really complain since I was not paying for it, but now I never read it...
It used to be toilette reading material, but I don't bring electronics in there, so now I never read it...
I stopped receiving the free print edition of Rangefinder magazine. I get the digital edition emailed to me, but I liked the print edition. Guess I can't really complain since I was not paying for it, but now I never read it...
It used to be toilette reading material, but I don't bring electronics in there, so now I never read it...
#7272
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Oh the sweet sound of a dot matrix printer...
Eff that I aint printing out a damn thing.
Eff that I aint printing out a damn thing.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (01-29-2014)
#7273
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,306
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,991 Posts
I use my iPad while on the can. I cringe when people ask to borrow it...
#7274
Needs more Lemon Pledge
#7275
My first Avatar....
Hear ye hear ye....
Over on POTN, in one of the many 7DII threads.
I'm involved in a conversation about possible upgrades that might be included in the future 7DII. Some one said this:
I said:
Then someone else chimed with this comment, directed at me - and here is where the debate started. Based on the concept of "photography" vs "videography".
So my question to you guys is this: Is taking video then extracting a single frame, and using it as an image for xxx purpose, photography? Or is it video editing or video extraction, if you will?
David - since you live and operate in both worlds - video and photo - what do you think?
I love the act of composing a shot and "clicking" the shutter. I can't imagine getting any satisfaction from taking a video then sifting through it to find just the right frame. Then again, I don't do this as a living in order to put food on the table. But the question still remains - is video frame grabbing, "photography"?
Over on POTN, in one of the many 7DII threads.
I'm involved in a conversation about possible upgrades that might be included in the future 7DII. Some one said this:
I think Canon is banking on the future being more video oriented with 4k and 8k coming along. All their improvements as of late have been with the video capability of the camera. Fix rolling shutter and Canon will have a huge advantage over it's competition.
Yeah in the video market. What would fixing this "rolling shutter" do for all of us boring still photographers?
Well, if you were aware of the 1D C's incredible ability to pull a very useable still from the video footage, then you would understand that by fixing rolling shutter you enhance this capability further. Right now the 1D C does a fantastic job pulling stills from slow moving or still subjects, but you can still tell that a frame was pulled from fast moving footage or where the camera was panning. I could easily see a future where the elimination of rolling shutter creates a photography where stills are no longer captured click by click, but merely pulled from video footage. It's already being done.
David - since you live and operate in both worlds - video and photo - what do you think?
I love the act of composing a shot and "clicking" the shutter. I can't imagine getting any satisfaction from taking a video then sifting through it to find just the right frame. Then again, I don't do this as a living in order to put food on the table. But the question still remains - is video frame grabbing, "photography"?
Last edited by pttl; 01-30-2014 at 07:16 AM.
#7276
Burning Brakes
Does this ebay ad seem like a scam says it's brand new and its 70 bucks less then B&H.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Brand-new-Sekonic-L-308S-FlashMate-Light-Meter-/111214071261?_trksid=p2054897.l4275
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...ght_Meter.html
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Brand-new-Sekonic-L-308S-FlashMate-Light-Meter-/111214071261?_trksid=p2054897.l4275
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...ght_Meter.html
#7277
Hear ye hear ye....
Over on POTN, in one of the many 7DII threads.
I'm involved in a conversation about possible upgrades that might be included in the future 7DII. Some one said this:
I said:
Then someone else chimed with this comment, directed at me - and here is where the debate started. Based on the concept of "photography" vs "videography".
So my question to you guys is this: Is taking video then extracting a single frame, and using it as an image for xxx purpose, photography? Or is it video editing or video extraction, if you will?
David - since you live and operate in both worlds - video and photo - what do you think?
I love the act of composing a shot and "clicking" the shutter. I can't imagine getting any satisfaction from taking a video then sifting through it to find just the right frame. Then again, I don't do this as a living in order to put food on the table. But the question still remains - is video frame grabbing, "photography"?
Over on POTN, in one of the many 7DII threads.
I'm involved in a conversation about possible upgrades that might be included in the future 7DII. Some one said this:
I said:
Then someone else chimed with this comment, directed at me - and here is where the debate started. Based on the concept of "photography" vs "videography".
So my question to you guys is this: Is taking video then extracting a single frame, and using it as an image for xxx purpose, photography? Or is it video editing or video extraction, if you will?
David - since you live and operate in both worlds - video and photo - what do you think?
I love the act of composing a shot and "clicking" the shutter. I can't imagine getting any satisfaction from taking a video then sifting through it to find just the right frame. Then again, I don't do this as a living in order to put food on the table. But the question still remains - is video frame grabbing, "photography"?
It's the reason I sold my Canon gear years ago for Nikon. A reason many like Seth Resnick have gone back to Nikon. Canon has become video focused.
#7278
My first Avatar....
Yeah, there grabbing for something, their asses..., j/k. I don't like that they can grab an image from a video. Just means they are spraying and praying, but that's them.
It's the reason I sold my Canon gear years ago for Nikon. A reason many like Seth Resnick have gone back to Nikon. Canon has become video focused.
It's the reason I sold my Canon gear years ago for Nikon. A reason many like Seth Resnick have gone back to Nikon. Canon has become video focused.
#7279
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,422
Received 5,080 Likes
on
2,697 Posts
Rolling shutter has NOTHING to do with pulling a still from the footage.
Rolling shutter is an issue related to the type of sensor (CMOS) and typically found in HDDSLR cameras...but is found to a lesser extent in other CMOS motion picture cameras. It has to do with how the image is recorded and during fast camera moves (quick pans, fast dolly moves, etc) or fast moving objects in front of the lens (helicopter blades) can create a distortion in the image.
Most people don't see it...hell even I don't pay attention that much...but the current generation of cameras has done a pretty damn good job suppressing it.
There is a format called CinemaRAW DNG that some cameras use...that provide all the RAW data as a series of stills (24 stills per sec = a buttload of fucking stills)
Anyway, the ability to pull a clean still has to do with the shutter angle. Standard motion picture uses a 180 degree (about 1/40-50) in the still world. This is going to allow for many of those frames to have some kind of motion blur on them.
To constantly pull clean stills you would need to shoot video at a much smaller angle or faster shutter. But renders the look of the video much different than you stand movie for the most part, and is used specific applications (high speed action, etc...the opening beach scene in Saving Pvt Ryan or the opening battle scene in Gladiator are examples of 90 degree shutters, where you start seeing clear pieces of a dirt flying across the screen in stead of dirt with motion blur)
There are reasons to pull stills from videos...but I would NEVER do it and call it photography.
The following users liked this post:
pttl (01-30-2014)
#7280
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
not a fan of screen grabs used as photos
The following users liked this post:
pttl (01-30-2014)