Acura: ZDX News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2009, 08:18 PM
  #1201  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
I've been saying from the beginning that it looked fine to me. I didn't understand all the hate. But best looking car this year? Im not sure I can get behind that statement
I notice that those that populate forums are sometimes the slowest to accept change.
Old 09-30-2009, 01:06 AM
  #1202  
Pro
 
cp3117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 719
Received 45 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
I've been saying from the beginning that it looked fine to me. I didn't understand all the hate. But best looking car this year? Im not sure I can get behind that statement
I agree.

I like it from the windshield back. The maroon picture of the passenger rear quarter looks really good.

Im one of the rare people that also likes the X6 though so.....
Old 09-30-2009, 01:18 AM
  #1203  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
At first I really, really, really liked the production-form X6 in pictures, though I personally saw no use for such a vehicle. I liked the X5 but the X6 was essentially an X5 with a fastback profile. Then I saw the X6 in person.... wtf? It simply doesn't look right for some reason. These Acuras on the other hand.... they don't look good in pictures already, so I'm not holding my breath for when I see them in person.

Its not nearly as bad as the 4G TL, but just like the 4G, there are some things that just leave me scratching my head. What's up with the tail lights and the blacked out part right above them? I see they tried to make it flow with the blacked out part on the hatch, but then it doesn't really work. Looks incomplete. And as mentioned, those reflectors/fogs by the exhaust outlets.

I'm trying really, really hard to like these new designs, but when I look at it from an unbiased perspective, they just look awful. Sigh
Old 09-30-2009, 02:13 AM
  #1204  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 44
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by vybzkartel
Wow, "best-looking new model on the market this year"!!!

Says something, don't it?
yeah, not many new models coming out this year
Old 09-30-2009, 08:41 AM
  #1205  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
like the rear.

Old 09-30-2009, 09:09 AM
  #1206  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
Its not nearly as bad as the 4G TL, but just like the 4G, there are some things that just leave me scratching my head. What's up with the tail lights and the blacked out part right above them?
I always try to bite my tongue when it comes to style comments. It's just so subjective that I feel my opinion is irrelevant. But I agree about the blacked out sections in the back. What is that? Are they trying to revitalize the two-tone look? It's been out of favor for so long now that maybe it will start to return. I don't know.

Someone could always just get it in black to avoid the contrast if it's a show stopper. I want to see it in black for that reason.
Old 09-30-2009, 10:47 AM
  #1207  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post


Old 09-30-2009, 11:55 AM
  #1208  
Racer
 
msl82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol, look at the changes of opinions. Initially everyone hated this new car. They were being so impulsive in saying this car was ugly and useless, I mean they haven't even seen this car in real life.

At least look at the car in REAL LIFE before making a judgement.
Old 09-30-2009, 11:58 AM
  #1209  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i still the it's ugly and useless.
Old 09-30-2009, 12:00 PM
  #1210  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,553
Received 22,882 Likes on 14,018 Posts
Originally Posted by JediMindTricks
i still the it's ugly and useless.
Say what...?
Old 09-30-2009, 12:00 PM
  #1211  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Still looks like to me.
Old 09-30-2009, 12:10 PM
  #1212  
Senior Moderator
 
West6MT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 9,237
Received 165 Likes on 127 Posts
Originally Posted by msl82
lol, look at the changes of opinions. Initially everyone hated this new car. They were being so impulsive in saying this car was ugly and useless, I mean they haven't even seen this car in real life.

At least look at the car in REAL LIFE before making a judgement.

You are making a judgment in calling everyone impulsive, which is not accurate based on the few posts above mine. Generalizing FTL.

What's wrong with people changing their opinions?


Still looks weird btw
Old 09-30-2009, 12:16 PM
  #1213  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,553
Received 22,882 Likes on 14,018 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Still looks like to me.
But, in terms of -age, it is less than the BMW X6 which is Aztek-esque ugliness...

I'd also name the Panamera as more than the ZDX...
Old 09-30-2009, 12:18 PM
  #1214  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,553
Received 22,882 Likes on 14,018 Posts
I'd liken this competition of to an Import Model pageant.
Old 09-30-2009, 12:23 PM
  #1215  
The sizzle in the Steak
Thread Starter
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumchah
But, in terms of -age, it is less than the BMW X6 which is Aztek-esque ugliness...

I'd also name the Panamera as more than the ZDX...
X6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZDX
Old 09-30-2009, 12:27 PM
  #1216  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,553
Received 22,882 Likes on 14,018 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
X6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZDX
No way. But, we're really just comparing ...and honestly, nothing good comes of comparisons.

Just alot of stink.
Old 09-30-2009, 12:49 PM
  #1217  
Intermediate
 
miketala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
X6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZDX
No way, i was 5 feet behind an X6 the other day and it looked truly stupid from behind.
Old 09-30-2009, 12:58 PM
  #1218  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I wouldn't say I like the look of the X6 but I don't find it nearly as ugly as the ZDX. My problem with both is how pointless they are.
Old 09-30-2009, 01:34 PM
  #1219  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Yumchah
Say what...?
i mean i still think it's ugly and useless.

that's what i get for posting while trying to work. or working while trying to post.

Originally Posted by Yumchah
But, in terms of -age, it is less than the BMW X6 which is Aztek-esque ugliness...

I'd also name the Panamera as more than the ZDX...


Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
X6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZDX


Originally Posted by miketala
No way, i was 5 feet behind an X6 the other day and it looked truly stupid from behind.
thing is...
1. moog's saying the X6 > ZDX, but they're both still (personally, i think the X6 looks awesome. FX > X6 > ZDX)
2. it's all objective anyways.

Originally Posted by dom
I wouldn't say I like the look of the X6 but I don't find it nearly as ugly as the ZDX. My problem with both is how pointless they are.
and that's probably an argument that's less objective than looks. and i agree.
Old 09-30-2009, 01:50 PM
  #1220  
Instructor
 
dtc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
...What's up with the tail lights and the blacked out part right above them? I see they tried to make it flow with the blacked out part on the hatch, but then it doesn't really work. Looks incomplete
Is it see through? Like the ones in Prius to make up for the rear visibility lost with the fastback rear windshield?

Old 09-30-2009, 01:55 PM
  #1221  
The sizzle in the Steak
Thread Starter
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I wouldn't say I like the look of the X6 but I don't find it nearly as ugly as the ZDX. My problem with both is how pointless they are.
I dunno about the pointless thing.

My problem is that out of all the vehicles the Acura line-up is missing, Acura goes out and builds a bad X6 knock-off?!?!?!

Acura: How about you fill the big holes in the line-up (flagship sedan, convertible, coupe, wagon) before you build "pointless" niche vehicles.
Old 09-30-2009, 01:58 PM
  #1222  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i wonder how long the ZDX (and X6) were in production for.
Old 09-30-2009, 02:09 PM
  #1223  
The sizzle in the Steak
Thread Starter
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by JediMindTricks
i wonder how long the ZDX (and X6) were in production for.
Dunno....but BMW can build vehicles like the X6, because they have a complete line-up....and now they are adding niche vehicles, whereas Acura.......
Old 09-30-2009, 02:15 PM
  #1224  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,553
Received 22,882 Likes on 14,018 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I wouldn't say I like the look of the X6 but I don't find it nearly as ugly as the ZDX. My problem with both is how pointless they are.
I guess I shouldn't tell you my next vehicle is likely something from that segment (i.e. FX50)...
Old 09-30-2009, 02:17 PM
  #1225  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,553
Received 22,882 Likes on 14,018 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Dunno....but BMW can build vehicles like the X6, because they have a complete line-up....and now they are adding niche vehicles, whereas Acura.......
Well, kinda goes with their entire "new-look" philosophy with the baking-plate-for-a-grille. Niche market.
Old 09-30-2009, 02:55 PM
  #1226  
Pro
 
cp3117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 719
Received 45 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
I dunno about the pointless thing.

My problem is that out of all the vehicles the Acura line-up is missing, Acura goes out and builds a bad X6 knock-off?!?!?!

Acura: How about you fill the big holes in the line-up (flagship sedan, convertible, coupe, wagon) before you build "pointless" niche vehicles.
How True....

I am sure if they sold 1500 Coupes a month compared to probably a couple hundred ZDX's they would be happier.

Who knows whats going on though up in their boardrooms, they change Acura's direction almost every coffee break.
Old 09-30-2009, 03:14 PM
  #1227  
Instructor
 
dtc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
I dunno about the pointless thing.

My problem is that out of all the vehicles the Acura line-up is missing, Acura goes out and builds a bad X6 knock-off?!?!?!

Acura: How about you fill the big holes in the line-up (flagship sedan, convertible, coupe, wagon) before you build "pointless" niche vehicles.
Isn't flagship sedan, convertible, coupe, wagon also "pointless" niche vehicles?
Old 09-30-2009, 03:26 PM
  #1228  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
I dunno about the pointless thing.

My problem is that out of all the vehicles the Acura line-up is missing, Acura goes out and builds a bad X6 knock-off?!?!?!

Acura: How about you fill the big holes in the line-up (flagship sedan, convertible, coupe, wagon) before you build "pointless" niche vehicles.
That's the most relevant point about all this. The ZDX might end up being a fine car. Hell, I think I even might buy one after my MDX lease runs out next year. But, did they really need THIS to be their next product? It's really the last thing they need right now. 50% of their product lineup will be utility vehicles now. Who has more than that? GMC maybe?
Old 09-30-2009, 03:44 PM
  #1229  
Three Wheelin'
 
krio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 1,751
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Still looks like to me.
+1. the interior too for me is ugly...

I prefer this:


Old 09-30-2009, 04:00 PM
  #1230  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Dunno....but BMW can build vehicles like the X6, because they have a complete line-up....and now they are adding niche vehicles, whereas Acura.......
true.

that's why i was wondering how long the ZDX was in production. surely, it's had to have been years or quite some time. during all that time, they could've (or maybe should've) placed their attention elsewhere.

Originally Posted by Yumchah
I guess I shouldn't tell you my next vehicle is likely something from that segment (i.e. FX50)...
so you finally decided? nice. i the new FX.

Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
That's the most relevant point about all this. The ZDX might end up being a fine car. Hell, I think I even might buy one after my MDX lease runs out next year. But, did they really need THIS to be their next product? It's really the last thing they need right now. 50% of their product lineup will be utility vehicles now. Who has more than that? GMC maybe?
Old 09-30-2009, 06:35 PM
  #1231  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Thanks for posting those pics, krio. My goodness, that interior is sumptuous. it is just right for me! The exterior....still dunno. I plan to go test drive that and the 6MT TL SH-AWD this fall.
Old 09-30-2009, 08:47 PM
  #1232  
Three Wheelin'
 
jhr3uva90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SF/Colma CA
Posts: 1,965
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts
Some random thoughts on the ZDX, please take with a big grain of salt:

1. They started developing this vehicle a few years ago BEFORE the launch of the BMW X6.

2. The ZDX is based heavily on the MDX. It is cheaper (and probably more profitable) for Acura to design a vehicle like the ZDX than to start from scratch with a new platform. Personally, I would have called it the "MDX coupe" or something similar in order to combine the ZDX sales with the MDX.

3. People on internet forums seem to crave an Acura coupe. However, Acura had two generations of CL coupes and both generations did not live up to sales expectations. If they made a TSX or TL based coupe today, it would probably sell even fewer units than the ZDX will. A convertible wouldn't even be worth the effort for Acura, which is a small brand of a relatively small car company.

4. Why does Acura have so many SUVs? Because Lexus become the top-selling luxury brand mainly because of SUVs. From the 1990s up until this economic downturn, many of the people who really bought luxury brands bought SUVs. By the time the trend changed starting in the summer of 2008, it was probably too late for Acura to cancel the ZDX.

5. Do Americans really buy wagons?

6. I would consider a "flagship" car to be a full-sized car with at least a V8 engine, various luxury features, and either RWD or AWD. Such cars usually have a base price of over $60K. Trends are even more against flagships than against SUVs. That's why Infiniti stopped making the Q a long time ago. The only flagships that will sell will be the German brands, although Lexus might sell a handful of LS sedans.
Old 09-30-2009, 08:47 PM
  #1233  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by krio
+1. the interior too for me is ugly...

I prefer this:


Tongue planted firmly in cheek? I never said anything about not liking the interior.

If only Acura could get the exterior as right as they get the interior.
Old 10-01-2009, 02:18 AM
  #1234  
Three Wheelin'
 
krio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 1,751
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Thanks for posting those pics, krio. My goodness, that interior is sumptuous. it is just right for me! The exterior....still dunno. I plan to go test drive that and the 6MT TL SH-AWD this fall.
the 5 series GT exterior is ugly, really...
but the new sedan 5 series will get the same interior...
Old 10-01-2009, 05:36 AM
  #1235  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
6. I would consider a "flagship" car to be a full-sized car with at least a V8 engine, various luxury features, and either RWD or AWD. Such cars usually have a base price of over $60K. Trends are even more against flagships than against SUVs. That's why Infiniti stopped making the Q a long time ago. The only flagships that will sell will be the German brands, although Lexus might sell a handful of LS sedans.
Let me offer an astonishing insight.

I happened to be browsing GM's site yesterday, and more specifically, "Ask Fritz", a blog in which GM executives answer questions from us, the "little people". (Wish Honda had one of those.)

Background:
Cadillac has much the same decision as Acura to make--like Acura, their bread and butter line, the CTS is the one that sells the most cars and right now that's what really defines Caddy. It was previously known for making no-holds-barred luxury cars with RWD and V8s. They killed the flagship sedan, the STS this year as part of a product rollout plan.

They are now deciding what the flagship should be. The rumors are leaning, just like Acura, toward a FWD/AWD car, albeit Caddy's will still have a V8 option.

Now back to the blog. A user asked when Caddy would be releasing their next V8 FR ubermobile. The exec's answer was shocking. I'll post the actual quote later, but basically he said that that market including the 7 series and S series was 5% of the car market and was shrinking even for BMW and Mercedes. He questioned the logic of developing for a shrinking market with limited resources.

Sound familiar? Sounds a lot like the new Honda CEO's answer to V8/FR platforms, which is that they won't develop for a shrinking market.

These are interesting times, indeed.
Old 10-01-2009, 06:56 AM
  #1236  
how handsome I am
 
agranado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 39
Posts: 12,983
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^ so what you're trying to say is that companies like Acura and Infiniti whom have not had flagships for years (or in acura's case, at all) have been ahead of the curve? pfft.

PS - the exterior of the ZDX is still atrocious. Interior has always been money.
Old 10-01-2009, 08:47 AM
  #1237  
Instructor
 
dtc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
^ I don't think that is what he is saying. At the end of the day, car companies are out to be profitable. They have answer to board members and stock holders. Both Acura and Infiniti have been doing relatively well without a flagship sedan. Why start now? If the ZDX is going to make Honda/Acura more profitable, I don’t have anything against that.
Old 10-01-2009, 09:27 AM
  #1238  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,072
Received 752 Likes on 453 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
A user asked when Caddy would be releasing their next V8 FR ubermobile.
Sorry for the dumb question but what does FR stand for?


Your post is right on, as are jhr3uva90's points. It's all about making investments that will pay off. It would be nice for Acura to have such a car, but the german companies already have these RWD platforms and they don't need to spend billions developing the next S or 7, Honda would.

Last edited by Belzebutt; 10-01-2009 at 09:31 AM.
Old 10-01-2009, 09:31 AM
  #1239  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Shorthand for the powertrain configuration
FF = Front Engine, Front Drive
FR = Front Engine, Rear Drive
MR = Mid Engine, Rear Drive,
etc...
Old 10-01-2009, 12:44 PM
  #1240  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by dtc5
^ I don't think that is what he is saying. At the end of the day, car companies are out to be profitable. They have answer to board members and stock holders. Both Acura and Infiniti have been doing relatively well without a flagship sedan. Why start now? If the ZDX is going to make Honda/Acura more profitable, I don’t have anything against that.
This.

Basically, Acura knows the ZDX is a low-volume niche car on which they can make loads of profit as it platform-shares with the MDX and Pilot. It will sell little, but still make money for Acura. I guess that's OK by me.

Originally Posted by Belzebutt
Sorry for the dumb question but what does FR stand for?
Mikey beat me to it.

Here's the exchange on "Tell Fritz".
When are going to make a real full size Rear Wheel Drive V-8 Cadillac sedan some thing to defeat the S class and 7 BMW?

Answer:
Dear xxxxxx - thanks for your interest in Cadillac. The market for these types of products is small (about 5% of luxury vehicles) and has been shrinking in the US. With government mandated requirements for fuel economy improvements, the production of large, V8 powered, passenger cars will be increasingly difficult. Cadillac is currently exploring concepts for new, efficient approaches to spacious luxury cars that represent a more rational and sustainable way to meet people’s needs in this segment. We think we can deliver the space, comfort, technology and fuel efficiency people want in a vehicle that is both desirable and prestigious. Look for a concept car at Detroit’s International Auto Show in January.

--Bryan Nesbitt, General Manager, Cadillac
I hope Acura is doing the same--this once and (perhaps) future customer is waiting.

Last edited by neuronbob; 10-01-2009 at 12:49 PM.


Quick Reply: Acura: ZDX News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.