Acura: RLX News
#3641
![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
Put all this stuff in a
![Sleep](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sleep.gif)
![Yawn](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yawn.gif)
Why cut yourself off at the knees right out of the gate, Honda?
The first thing that catches the buyer's eye for any car is what it looks like on the outside....and Honda is trying to sell the buyer's of $50k automobiles an Accord?!?!?
![Squint](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/squint.gif)
At $50k, the buyer wants presence and prestige......from the outside first, then work towards the inside.
Reliability, fuel efficiency and certain extent depreciation will also play a part. and this car is just about the fastest luxury vehicile in $50k range.
There is not a single item of Accord. Every thing is different. from double wishbone suspension to DI engine with new 6AT/ paddle shifters, acoustic glass. unless you show me a single major part from Accord?
No one will mistake it for Accord unlike BMWs. which share same music, navigation, cameras, interior, engines across the line up.
Every thing is very exclusive to Acura.
![](http://www.hondanews.com/photos/b0e2/66e5/b0e266e5-cdaf-48d0-a747-c6d2ca2414f3-500x353.jpg)
#3642
MechEng
iTrader: (9)
And with a 7-series price tag to boot? It would never sell. Acura is not in that market and probably never will be. And with no V8 option it will die the same slow death the CL did.
Look at the Equus. Similar amenities described above but it's a very very low volume car and caters to a very small market (rich people who are stingy with their money and have no desire to flash it with the car they drive). Do those people really exist?![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Look at the Equus. Similar amenities described above but it's a very very low volume car and caters to a very small market (rich people who are stingy with their money and have no desire to flash it with the car they drive). Do those people really exist?
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
![Snicker](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/emot-laugh.gif)
![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
#3643
אני עומד עם ישראל
dammit mteazy you deleted your comment before I could reply
The following users liked this post:
MTEAZY (11-29-2012)
#3644
The sizzle in the Steak
$50k is not big money.more in middle class.
Reliability, fuel efficiency and certain extent depreciation will also play a part. and this car is just about the fastest luxury vehicile in $50k range.
There is not a single item of Accord. Every thing is different. from double wishbone suspension to DI engine with new 6AT/ paddle shifters, acoustic glass. unless you show me a single major part from Accord?
No one will mistake it for Accord unlike BMWs. which share same music, navigation, cameras, interior, engines across the line up.
Every thing is very exclusive to Acura.
![](http://www.hondanews.com/photos/b0e2/66e5/b0e266e5-cdaf-48d0-a747-c6d2ca2414f3-500x353.jpg)
Reliability, fuel efficiency and certain extent depreciation will also play a part. and this car is just about the fastest luxury vehicile in $50k range.
There is not a single item of Accord. Every thing is different. from double wishbone suspension to DI engine with new 6AT/ paddle shifters, acoustic glass. unless you show me a single major part from Accord?
No one will mistake it for Accord unlike BMWs. which share same music, navigation, cameras, interior, engines across the line up.
Every thing is very exclusive to Acura.
![](http://www.hondanews.com/photos/b0e2/66e5/b0e266e5-cdaf-48d0-a747-c6d2ca2414f3-500x353.jpg)
![Snicker](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/emot-laugh.gif)
#3645
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,201
Received 4,852 Likes
on
2,589 Posts
From the photos...(im going to try and go to autoshow tomorrow) it just doesnt look like a good design.
The headlamps are ugly and dont flow in to the front...the power plenum grill is same pile of shit we all hate. The tail lights look bulbous and out of place...given am odd design just because everyone does it these days.
The interior...that center stack looks like a chestburster is making its way out. Also makes the interior look/feel smaller.
It just does not look good to me.
The headlamps are ugly and dont flow in to the front...the power plenum grill is same pile of shit we all hate. The tail lights look bulbous and out of place...given am odd design just because everyone does it these days.
The interior...that center stack looks like a chestburster is making its way out. Also makes the interior look/feel smaller.
It just does not look good to me.
The following users liked this post:
CLtotheTL32 (11-29-2012)
#3646
Some dude
#3647
Three Wheelin'
![Yawn](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yawn.gif)
If and this is a big IF... Honda manages to move 1000 a month to start they'll be lucky.... we'll see the numbers drop like the last generation -- and taper off to sub ~100/month around MMC time...
I'll wait... but seeing the direction this economy is headed I think the market will speak for itself on this one.
#3648
The sizzle in the Steak
Meanwhile in the land of DOA, the ZDX meets its new friend the RLX.
The following 3 users liked this post by Moog-Type-S:
#3649
Honda Fanboy
I think Acura's definition of a flagship is misunderstood ![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Audi = A8
BMW = 7 Series
Cadillac (not on price, but size wise) = XTS
Hyundai (not even a tier 2 luxury marque) = Equus
Jaguar = XJ
Lexus = LS
MB = S-Class
200 inches in length or more. Infiniti doesn't have a true flagship in the states either.
Like I said my expectations are different. I guess.
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Audi = A8
BMW = 7 Series
Cadillac (not on price, but size wise) = XTS
Hyundai (not even a tier 2 luxury marque) = Equus
Jaguar = XJ
Lexus = LS
MB = S-Class
200 inches in length or more. Infiniti doesn't have a true flagship in the states either.
Like I said my expectations are different. I guess.
The difference between the RLX as a flagship and an S class, for example, as a flagship, is that the RLX is an E-segment car whereas the S-Class is an F-segment car. Acura doesn't have a true F-segment car, which is what cars like the 7-Series, S-Class, and A8 are.
The RLX has more rear legroom than a 750i, A8, and LS460. In fact, the RLX has 3 inches of more rear legroom than an LS460, but you can't say the LS460 is not a true flagship because of its size. It is the flagship of the Lexus brand. Flagship does not automatically equal F-segment car.
#3650
אני עומד עם ישראל
I think Acura's definition of a flagship is misunderstood ![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Audi = A8
BMW = 7 Series
Cadillac (not on price, but size wise) = XTS
Hyundai (not even a tier 2 luxury marque) = Equus
Jaguar = XJ
Lexus = LS
MB = S-Class
200 inches in length or more. Infiniti doesn't have a true flagship in the states either.
Like I said my expectations are different. I guess.
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Audi = A8
BMW = 7 Series
Cadillac (not on price, but size wise) = XTS
Hyundai (not even a tier 2 luxury marque) = Equus
Jaguar = XJ
Lexus = LS
MB = S-Class
200 inches in length or more. Infiniti doesn't have a true flagship in the states either.
Like I said my expectations are different. I guess.
Size has nothing to do with defining a flagship. A flagship is supposed to be representation of the best a brand has to offer; their top of the line product. Just because an S class is larger than the RLX, that doesn't mean the RLX is not a flagship. Both cars are the flagship of their respective companies.
The difference between the RLX as a flagship and an S class, for example, as a flagship, is that the RLX is an E-segment car whereas the S-Class is an F-segment car. Acura doesn't have a true F-segment car, which is what cars like the 7-Series, S-Class, and A8 are.
The RLX has more rear legroom than a 750i, A8, and LS460. In fact, the RLX has 3 inches of more rear legroom than an LS460, but you can't say the LS460 is not a true flagship because of its size. It is the flagship of the Lexus brand. Flagship does not automatically equal F-segment car.
The difference between the RLX as a flagship and an S class, for example, as a flagship, is that the RLX is an E-segment car whereas the S-Class is an F-segment car. Acura doesn't have a true F-segment car, which is what cars like the 7-Series, S-Class, and A8 are.
The RLX has more rear legroom than a 750i, A8, and LS460. In fact, the RLX has 3 inches of more rear legroom than an LS460, but you can't say the LS460 is not a true flagship because of its size. It is the flagship of the Lexus brand. Flagship does not automatically equal F-segment car.
This is Acura's flagship I'm not disagreeing with you. It is still not a player in the luxury flagship arena despite how much you may want it to be.
This is a mid-size competitor to the E/5/A6/M/XF world as you mentioned.
Hence the fact Acura is once again lacking a true luxury flagship. So, as I mentioned earlier my expectations will be completely different than yours. I'm following the market and what Acura's competitors are producing. The RLX may be a very roomy mid-sizer, but it is not a full size luxury flagship.
Another miss from Acura. Hopefully I'm wrong and the market wants their mid-size flagship..
#3651
Honda Fanboy
Stop.
This is Acura's flagship I'm not disagreeing with you. It is still not a player in the luxury flagship arena despite how much you may want it to be.
This is a mid-size competitor to the E/5/A6/M/XF world as you mentioned.
Hence the fact Acura is once again lacking a true luxury flagship. So, as I mentioned earlier my expectations will be completely different than yours. I'm following the market and what Acura's competitors are producing. The RLX may be a very roomy mid-sizer, but it is not a full size luxury flagship.
Another miss from Acura. Hopefully I'm wrong and the market wants their mid-size flagship..
This is Acura's flagship I'm not disagreeing with you. It is still not a player in the luxury flagship arena despite how much you may want it to be.
This is a mid-size competitor to the E/5/A6/M/XF world as you mentioned.
Hence the fact Acura is once again lacking a true luxury flagship. So, as I mentioned earlier my expectations will be completely different than yours. I'm following the market and what Acura's competitors are producing. The RLX may be a very roomy mid-sizer, but it is not a full size luxury flagship.
Another miss from Acura. Hopefully I'm wrong and the market wants their mid-size flagship..
You're not understanding the fact that the "luxury flagship arena" is not exclusive to F-segment cars.
What you're trying to say is that the RLX is not a true F-segment car, which it is not, and nobody is disagreeing with you about that. Acura is not lacking a flagship; the RLX is that. What Acura is lacking is an F-segment car that competes directly with the flagships of Audi, BMW, and MB (which are all F-segment).
You need to look up what the definition of Flagship is because you're obviously not clear in your understanding of it. It has nothing to do with size or price, hence your reference to the XTS.
#3652
Moderator
Settle down, Bub.
You're not understanding the fact that the "luxury flagship arena" is not exclusive to F-segment cars.
What you're trying to say is that the RLX is not a true F-segment car, which it is not, and nobody is disagreeing with you about that. Acura is not lacking a flagship; the RLX is that. What Acura is lacking is an F-segment car that competes directly with the flagships of Audi, BMW, and MB (which are all F-segment).
You need to look up what the definition of Flagship is because you're obviously not clear in your understanding of it. It has nothing to do with size or price, hence your reference to the XTS.
You're not understanding the fact that the "luxury flagship arena" is not exclusive to F-segment cars.
What you're trying to say is that the RLX is not a true F-segment car, which it is not, and nobody is disagreeing with you about that. Acura is not lacking a flagship; the RLX is that. What Acura is lacking is an F-segment car that competes directly with the flagships of Audi, BMW, and MB (which are all F-segment).
You need to look up what the definition of Flagship is because you're obviously not clear in your understanding of it. It has nothing to do with size or price, hence your reference to the XTS.
#3653
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
#3654
Midnight Marauder
#3655
אני עומד עם ישראל
Settle down, Bub.
You're not understanding the fact that the "luxury flagship arena" is not exclusive to F-segment cars.
What you're trying to say is that the RLX is not a true F-segment car, which it is not, and nobody is disagreeing with you about that. Acura is not lacking a flagship; the RLX is that. What Acura is lacking is an F-segment car that competes directly with the flagships of Audi, BMW, and MB (which are all F-segment).
You need to look up what the definition of Flagship is because you're obviously not clear in your understanding of it. It has nothing to do with size or price, hence your reference to the XTS.
You're not understanding the fact that the "luxury flagship arena" is not exclusive to F-segment cars.
What you're trying to say is that the RLX is not a true F-segment car, which it is not, and nobody is disagreeing with you about that. Acura is not lacking a flagship; the RLX is that. What Acura is lacking is an F-segment car that competes directly with the flagships of Audi, BMW, and MB (which are all F-segment).
You need to look up what the definition of Flagship is because you're obviously not clear in your understanding of it. It has nothing to do with size or price, hence your reference to the XTS.
We can go in circles all day long. The fact of the matter is Acura does not have a flagship to compete with the other luxury brand's flagships.
Does that sound better to you?
#3656
Honda Fanboy
#3657
Moderator
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (11-29-2012)
#3659
Honda Fanboy
My concern is more about the future of SH-AWD on the TL. Will it retain the option of SH-AWD? Mechanical or Electric? What kind of premium should we expect if it's going to be electric, and what will that do to the availability of a manual transmission.
#3660
Moderator
Probably the same cars it competes with right now. Depending on the future of the TSX, I don't see the TLX moving upmarket. That was the plan four years ago but as we all know, Acura rescinded their tier-aspirations. I expect the TLX to get the Accord treatment: smaller on the outside, same size on the inside.
My concern is more about the future of SH-AWD on the TL. Will it retain the option of SH-AWD? Mechanical or Electric? What kind of premium should we expect if it's going to be electric, and what will that do to the availability of a manual transmission.
My concern is more about the future of SH-AWD on the TL. Will it retain the option of SH-AWD? Mechanical or Electric? What kind of premium should we expect if it's going to be electric, and what will that do to the availability of a manual transmission.
#3662
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
I think the styling is just elegantly bland. It doesn't look ugly to me. The styling direction of the RLX is closer to the LS and A6 IMO (conservative, kinda bland, easy on the eyes).
From the comments here, it seems like people don't have much of a problem with the RLX other than the styling. I think what you guys want to see is something similar to the CLS and A7?
From the comments here, it seems like people don't have much of a problem with the RLX other than the styling. I think what you guys want to see is something similar to the CLS and A7?
#3663
ttribe & his goons
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
#3664
Honda Fanboy
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
According to Acura, competition for the RLX includes the BMW 535i, Lexus GS350 and Audi A6.
Hope that helps!
#3665
Moderator
Anyway, I guess I can see the GS350 and the Infiniti M. Maybe a base 528 or base A6, but I think it would have a hard time measuring up to anything more than a base model variant of those two.
I think this goes back to Hapa's point though (at the risk of furthering the "bromance" accusation) - it's unfortunate that Acura's premier flagship model can only attempt to take on the middle models of its competitors (Infiniti as the notable exception). This lends further credence to the notion that the RLX squeezes out the TL since, really, the TL is supposed to be the 5/A6/M fighter. Acura's market positioning just doesn't make any sense; they have two mid-size sedans competing in the same space.
Last edited by ttribe; 11-29-2012 at 05:05 PM.
#3666
Team Owner
I would take the Genesis 5.0 Rspec over this in less than a heartbeat and with money left to cover almost 1 year of car payment.
#3667
Team Owner
I think the styling is just elegantly bland. It doesn't look ugly to me. The styling direction of the RLX is closer to the LS and A6 IMO (conservative, kinda bland, easy on the eyes).
From the comments here, it seems like people don't have much of a problem with the RLX other than the styling. I think what you guys want to see is something similar to the CLS and A7?
From the comments here, it seems like people don't have much of a problem with the RLX other than the styling. I think what you guys want to see is something similar to the CLS and A7?
you can call some of those cars ugly but you can't say they are boring looking.
New CLS is one god damn good weird looking car, FYI.
with this, you have a 70 years grandma design and yet you claim you can corner faster than everyone else.....
#3668
Honda Fanboy
Yeah, I'm the troll but he posts crap like this - https://acurazine.com/forums/showpos...postcount=3001. Whatever.
Anyway, I guess I can see the GS350 and the Infiniti M. Maybe a base 528 or base A6, but I think it would have a hard time measuring up to anything more than a base model variant of those two.
I think this goes back to Hapa's point though (at the risk of furthering the "bromance" accusation) - it's unfortunate that Acura's premier flagship model can only attempt to take on the middle models of its competitors (Infiniti as the notable exception). This lends further credence to the notion that the RLX squeezes out the TL since, really, the TL is supposed to be the 5/A6/M fighter. Acura's market positioning just doesn't make any sense; they have two mid-size sedans competing in the same space.
Anyway, I guess I can see the GS350 and the Infiniti M. Maybe a base 528 or base A6, but I think it would have a hard time measuring up to anything more than a base model variant of those two.
I think this goes back to Hapa's point though (at the risk of furthering the "bromance" accusation) - it's unfortunate that Acura's premier flagship model can only attempt to take on the middle models of its competitors (Infiniti as the notable exception). This lends further credence to the notion that the RLX squeezes out the TL since, really, the TL is supposed to be the 5/A6/M fighter. Acura's market positioning just doesn't make any sense; they have two mid-size sedans competing in the same space.
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
You seriously edited your post so you can add a link to a post I made? What good would that do? Yeah, you're not the troll.
You clearly have some insecurity issues, which is evident in your effort to disprove that you're a troll.
#3669
Moderator
And yet you did nothing to address the substance of my post; you just focused in on my response to your insult of me. What is your deal?
#3670
If RLX competes with BMW 535i, Lexus GS350 and Audi A6, does that mean TL(X) competes with 335i, IS350 and Audi A4?
If so, does that mean TSX competes with BMW 135i, ES350, and Audi A3?
If so, does that mean the ILX competes with..... shit, what does the ILX compete with?![Scratch](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)
Acura is so
with their lineup and marketing.
If so, does that mean TSX competes with BMW 135i, ES350, and Audi A3?
If so, does that mean the ILX competes with..... shit, what does the ILX compete with?
![Scratch](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)
Acura is so
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
The following 5 users liked this post by AZuser:
civicdrivr (11-30-2012),
Costco (11-29-2012),
Hapa DC5 (11-29-2012),
phile (11-29-2012),
ttribe (11-29-2012)
#3671
Moderator
If RLX competes with BMW 535i, Lexus GS350 and Audi A6, does that mean TL(X) competes with 335i, IS350 and Audi A4?
If so, does that mean TSX competes with BMW 135i, ES350, and Audi A3?
If so, does that mean the ILX competes with..... shit, what does the ILX compete with?![Scratch](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)
Acura is so
with their lineup and marketing.
If so, does that mean TSX competes with BMW 135i, ES350, and Audi A3?
If so, does that mean the ILX competes with..... shit, what does the ILX compete with?
![Scratch](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)
Acura is so
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
#3672
Honda Fanboy
There was no substance in the post to address. And I'm sorry that you being in my ignore list is an insult. It's just the internet. Act your age.
#3673
אני עומד עם ישראל
Goons? He has the man on ignore, so I posted it for him.
I have the same bromance with you. I'd extend the courtesy if someone had you on block and they wanted to ask you a question, which I'm sure a lot do
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
#3674
Moderator
[sigh] You won't even try to be reasonable? You see nothing to discuss substantively in this - "...it's unfortunate that Acura's premier flagship model can only attempt to take on the middle models of its competitors (Infiniti as the notable exception). This lends further credence to the notion that the RLX squeezes out the TL since, really, the TL is supposed to be the 5/A6/M fighter. Acura's market positioning just doesn't make any sense; they have two mid-size sedans competing in the same space."? Seriously?
Last edited by ttribe; 11-29-2012 at 06:44 PM.
#3675
Honda Fanboy
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
#3676
Honda Fanboy
[sigh] You won't even try to be reasonable? You see nothing to discuss substantively in this - "...it's unfortunate that Acura's premier flagship model can only attempt to take on the middle models of its competitors (Infiniti as the notable exception). This lends further credence to the notion that the RLX squeezes out the TL since, really, the TL is supposed to be the 5/A6/M fighter. Acura's market positioning just doesn't make any sense; they have two mid-size sedans competing in the same space."? Seriously?
#3677
Moderator
#3679
Moderator
#3680
Honda Fanboy