Acura: RLX News
The following 2 users liked this post by phile:
civicdrivr (06-23-2012),
ttribe (06-23-2012)
#3322
Honda Fanboy
You're more devoted to the cause than I thought. Be a man and just end this right here. If not, continue on.
#3323
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
The following users liked this post:
phile (06-23-2012)
#3324
Honda Fanboy
Considering the post you made last night, do you honestly think anything positive could come out of this post? Do you really think your comment was a positive contribution to a thread that has already been derailed and just starting to wind down? If you were serious about not wanting to read BS posts on here, then don't post BS and inflammatory comments. BS comment=BS response. It's a 2-way street. Here is my third attempt asking for people to show me how much more mature they are than me and take the high road.
#3325
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
You're right. High road taken:
The following 2 users liked this post by civicdrivr:
Hapa DC5 (06-23-2012),
VTEC Racer (06-23-2012)
#3326
Racer
Sure one can find plenty of sporty sedans out there but the flagships of the premium luxury manufacturers are all conservative. The flagships of Audi, BMW, and Lexus all have conservative designs. My guess is that is what Acura was aiming for, even though the RLX will probably be a step below them with it's size and features/functions.
Some folks are just being overly critical of this Acura design but seem to have different standards for other manufacturers.
Some folks are just being overly critical of this Acura design but seem to have different standards for other manufacturers.
Now if Acura can deliver as promised. 350+ hp 30/30/30 mpg and sh awd then that's something I don't think any of the other flagships can currently touch. talk about advance.
Haters comments will be ignored
#3327
Considering the post you made last night, do you honestly think anything positive could come out of this post? Do you really think your comment was a positive contribution to a thread that has already been derailed and just starting to wind down? If you were serious about not wanting to read BS posts on here, then don't post BS and inflammatory comments. BS comment=BS response. It's a 2-way street. Here is my third attempt asking for people to show me how much more mature they are than me and take the high road.
Originally Posted by VTEC Race
LOL wait a minute....wait... You actually spent time searching for that? You went searching through a bunch of threads to point out someone having a powetrip? So what was the ending result from it? What exactly are you trying to point out? All this effort for me?
Oh by the way, since you're trying to make it seem like I have no life coming here as if all for you (I'm on AZ everyday, but that's my business), how are you doing this fine Saturday? Here...also...on AZ...
#3328
Is this the same Acurazine I joined 8 years ago, or this some sort of new kindergarten online community?!
BTW, I'm on VTECRacer's and HAWAII-TSX's side. Yes, I'm a Honda/Acura FANBOY to! That's why I joined this site all these years ago. Not to come on here and whine like a little child that didn't get that new pair of Jordans that he asked for!
Y'all other guys keep trying to beat that horse to death...and we all know that horse is dead already!
BTW, I'm on VTECRacer's and HAWAII-TSX's side. Yes, I'm a Honda/Acura FANBOY to! That's why I joined this site all these years ago. Not to come on here and whine like a little child that didn't get that new pair of Jordans that he asked for!
Y'all other guys keep trying to beat that horse to death...and we all know that horse is dead already!
Last edited by vybzkartel; 06-23-2012 at 08:15 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by vybzkartel:
HAWAII-TSX (06-23-2012),
VTEC Racer (06-24-2012)
#3329
Another thing...if I was driving a BMW,M-B, Lexus, etc, I wouldn't see the point in me coming on here and trying to feed y'all with some sort of BS that my car is better than H/A.
#3330
Moderator
The following 5 users liked this post by ttribe:
05TLdcc (06-24-2012),
CarbonGray Earl (06-24-2012),
civicdrivr (06-24-2012),
Costco (06-26-2012),
Hapa DC5 (06-23-2012)
The following 8 users liked this post by dom:
civicdrivr (06-24-2012),
Costco (06-26-2012),
EL19 (06-25-2012),
F23A4 (06-24-2012),
MTEAZY (06-24-2012),
and 3 others liked this post.
#3333
#3334
Senior Moderator
#3335
Racer
does anyone know what other acuras will offer the sh sh awd and 7 spd dual clutch trans.
I understand that it will debut on the rlx but will be on the next mdx and nsx but im wondering if anyone knows if it will end up on the tl or tlx or mainly zdx (if its still around that is). Sorry if I posted this in the wrong place but I figure I would get the most answers from here.
Thanks in "ADVANCE"
I understand that it will debut on the rlx but will be on the next mdx and nsx but im wondering if anyone knows if it will end up on the tl or tlx or mainly zdx (if its still around that is). Sorry if I posted this in the wrong place but I figure I would get the most answers from here.
Thanks in "ADVANCE"
#3336
Three Wheelin'
+1, yep I was kind amused (amazed) by the styling criticism since this is Acura's flagship and majority of flagships are fairly conservative. Both Audi (A7) and MB (CLS) have sporty sedans that follow a more stylist approach but they are not there flagships and there are some exceptions (Jaguar and Porsche) who only offer modern flagships too.
Acura has swung and missed ever since they renamed the "Legend" and IMO, cannot afford to be so conservative. They're now rolling out the "RLX" name, but with no USP (unique selling proposition) that would attract new customers. I mean really, why would a luxury buyer choose this vehicle over the established competition?
One way is design (think Chrysler 300C, we know 300s weren't moving off the lots because of quality). In staying conservative, perhaps the strategy is to capture TL owners moving up, but I'm not sure that's going to be enough to move the sales charts much. I hope my speculation is wrong.
We can just agree to disagree.
The following users liked this post:
ttribe (06-25-2012)
#3337
Senior Moderator
You're showing luxury stalwarts like the E-class, where MB has had years of building a solid customer base that would more than likely expect a conservative design.
Acura has swung and missed ever since they renamed the "Legend" and IMO, cannot afford to be so conservative. They're now rolling out the "RLX" name, but with no USP (unique selling proposition) that would attract new customers. I mean really, why would a luxury buyer choose this vehicle over the established competition?
One way is design (think Chrysler 300C, we know 300s weren't moving off the lots because of quality). In staying conservative, perhaps the strategy is to capture TL owners moving up, but I'm not sure that's going to be enough to move the sales charts much. I hope my speculation is wrong.
We can just agree to disagree.
Acura has swung and missed ever since they renamed the "Legend" and IMO, cannot afford to be so conservative. They're now rolling out the "RLX" name, but with no USP (unique selling proposition) that would attract new customers. I mean really, why would a luxury buyer choose this vehicle over the established competition?
One way is design (think Chrysler 300C, we know 300s weren't moving off the lots because of quality). In staying conservative, perhaps the strategy is to capture TL owners moving up, but I'm not sure that's going to be enough to move the sales charts much. I hope my speculation is wrong.
We can just agree to disagree.
#3338
AZ Community Team
Acura has swung and missed ever since they renamed the "Legend" and IMO, cannot afford to be so conservative. They're now rolling out the "RLX" name, but with no USP (unique selling proposition) that would attract new customers. I mean really, why would a luxury buyer choose this vehicle over the established competition?
One way is design (think Chrysler 300C, we know 300s weren't moving off the lots because of quality). In staying conservative, perhaps the strategy is to capture TL owners moving up, but I'm not sure that's going to be enough to move the sales charts much. I hope my speculation is wrong.
We can just agree to disagree.
We can just agree to disagree.
#3339
AZ Community Team
I agree, this is a concerning area since in many ways it looks like a FWD gas/electric and electric RWD. So although neat and novel (Ferrari rumored to try the opposite), it may not be enough.
#3340
99 TL, 06 E350
#3341
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
+1, yep I was kind amused (amazed) by the styling criticism since this is Acura's flagship and majority of flagships are fairly conservative. Both Audi (A7) and MB (CLS) have sporty sedans that follow a more stylist approach but they are not there flagships and there are some exceptions (Jaguar and Porsche) who only offer modern flagships too.
does anyone know what other acuras will offer the sh sh awd and 7 spd dual clutch trans.
I understand that it will debut on the rlx but will be on the next mdx and nsx but im wondering if anyone knows if it will end up on the tl or tlx or mainly zdx (if its still around that is). Sorry if I posted this in the wrong place but I figure I would get the most answers from here.
Thanks in "ADVANCE"
I understand that it will debut on the rlx but will be on the next mdx and nsx but im wondering if anyone knows if it will end up on the tl or tlx or mainly zdx (if its still around that is). Sorry if I posted this in the wrong place but I figure I would get the most answers from here.
Thanks in "ADVANCE"
I probably missed it but what's USP again?
#3342
AZ Community Team
The following users liked this post:
iforyou (06-26-2012)
#3343
Some dude
The best for us Acura enthusiasts is to have both - one conversative sedan like the RLX and one stylish model that can compete against A7, CLS, etc. They did it with the MDX and ZDX, they should be able to do the same with the RLX (but make it practical and pretty please).
#3344
6G TLX-S
Acura needs to breakthrough the $50K sedan price barrier first.
If the next gen. RL/RLX can succeed, anything above it can become possible.
#3346
Safety Car
Usa
A “perfect storm” of market conditions may prompt Honda to move assembly of its upcoming flagship, the 2013 Acura RLX, from Japan to the United States.
1st, the stigma that U.S.-built luxury cars can’t rival the build quality of Japanese or German models is no longer valid. BMW builds X3 and X6 models in Spartanburg, South Carolina for worldwide distribution, and Mercedes-Benz builds M Class, R Class and GL Class models in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Even Acura’s flagship sports coupe, the upcoming NSX hybrid, will be designed and built on these shores. It makes sense, then, that Acura’s flagship sedan, rumored to benefit from the same type of hybrid all-wheel-drive layout (in range-topping models, anyway) will also be built in the United States.
Confirmation seems to come from The Japan Times (via Carscoop), which reports that Honda will halt production of 2 sedan models at its plant in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. On that list is the Honda Legend, sold here as the current Acura RL.
There are financial reasons to move production to the U.S. as well. A strong Japanese yen and a weak U.S. dollar mean that it’s expensive to build cars in Japan, requiring automakers to raise prices or accept lower margins. Domestic production would help to lower costs and preserve margins, putting more money in Honda’s coffers.
Honda desperately needs the RL’s replacement to be a hit, since it’s sold just 182 RL sedans through May of this year. That’s down from 766 units in the same period of 2011, a sales decline of over 76%.
#3347
The sizzle in the Steak
Nothing shocking here. Japanese automakers cannot build in Japan and sell in the U.S. and try to make a good profit. Strong Yen and weaker dollar is killing them.
#3349
I'm the Firestarter
It looks way better in motion IMO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6deeToD380
Feels more "substantial"......more road presence.......I mean it's not the sharpest/best looking car, but it certainly looks a whole lot better than those patent pics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6deeToD380
Feels more "substantial"......more road presence.......I mean it's not the sharpest/best looking car, but it certainly looks a whole lot better than those patent pics.
a) It has huge wheels that (knowing Acura) you will never be able to actually buy.
b) It has little extra touches like ground effects that are on the concept and not in the actual car and make it look more agressive.
It's basically a generic-looking Japanese car with nice LED lights. What really kills it is the FWD-induced huge front overhang, always Acura's Achilles' heel.
#3350
Senior Moderator
I don't hate it. Just that, wish Honda/Acura could've done more for a car in that pricepoint/market.
I will however wait to see it in person and hopefully can go around in one before I commence with the venom and spew.
I will however wait to see it in person and hopefully can go around in one before I commence with the venom and spew.
#3351
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
It looks better in motion in this video because:
a) It has huge wheels that (knowing Acura) you will never be able to actually buy.
b) It has little extra touches like ground effects that are on the concept and not in the actual car and make it look more agressive.
It's basically a generic-looking Japanese car with nice LED lights. What really kills it is the FWD-induced huge front overhang, always Acura's Achilles' heel.
a) It has huge wheels that (knowing Acura) you will never be able to actually buy.
b) It has little extra touches like ground effects that are on the concept and not in the actual car and make it look more agressive.
It's basically a generic-looking Japanese car with nice LED lights. What really kills it is the FWD-induced huge front overhang, always Acura's Achilles' heel.
#3352
I'm the Firestarter
I mean the car looks better when it is in motion, rather than simply looking at the photos from the autoshow. Perhaps the color helps as well as silver is pretty much the most bland color? The front overhang doesn't bother me that much.....but I can see why people are upset about it.
#3353
Some dude
Just watched the video again... however picked that song should be fired. It's sleep inducing.
#3354
Team Owner
I normally have no problem with similar styles. But i seriously won't be able to tell the difference between a 5/7 series and this.....
what s the MSRP on this? Acura can shove it if they want anything over $50k for it
what s the MSRP on this? Acura can shove it if they want anything over $50k for it
#3355
AZ Community Team
^ I fully expect the AWD version to be in the mid-$50K
The current RL MSRP starts at $48K up to $56K, so this next model will probably be above that.
The current RL MSRP starts at $48K up to $56K, so this next model will probably be above that.
Last edited by Legend2TL; 06-27-2012 at 03:40 PM.
#3356
Racer
if it reviews well in performance and fuel economy I would pay $60 - $67k for a top of the line model. I would not pay $70 or over for it. I know the lexus hybrid LS is about 100k and prob handles badly. Infiniti M56x AWD Starting at: $61,700* I think if they keep the the top of the line under 70k that would be fair. considering hybrid 370hp 7spd dsg sh awd and 30/30/30 mpg.
It will have to top the charts in handling and performance to put it back on the radar though which I think is the hardest challenge.
It will have to top the charts in handling and performance to put it back on the radar though which I think is the hardest challenge.
#3357
AZ Community Team
This video is careful to show the car from the best angles, I can guarantee they purposely try to hide the overhang. I agree the car looks better on this video than in pictures, but that's Acura: design good-looking cars you can't buy, and sell average or ugly-looking cars at the dealerships.
Last edited by Legend2TL; 06-27-2012 at 05:05 PM.
#3358
Moderator
, the 3G TL concept was virtually identical to the production except for the mirrors. The ILX also looks identical to the concept save for the big wheels and Brembo calipers. I can't think of anything that was promoted as a concept that didn't make it to the showrooms in almost the same styling.
#3359
6G TLX-S
if it reviews well in performance and fuel economy I would pay $60 - $67k for a top of the line model. I would not pay $70 or over for it. I know the lexus hybrid LS is about 100k and prob handles badly. Infiniti M56x AWD Starting at: $61,700* I think if they keep the the top of the line under 70k that would be fair. considering hybrid 370hp 7spd dsg sh awd and 30/30/30 mpg.
It will have to top the charts in handling and performance to put it back on the radar though which I think is the hardest challenge.
It will have to top the charts in handling and performance to put it back on the radar though which I think is the hardest challenge.
Remember that the RL model has yet to overcome the $50K price barrier, and it's sales figure spells out that the RL is neither popular nor well received. So a big jump on the price tag is never a good idea, before the RL/RLX name is established and received well.
One other method is to give the RL-replacement a clean sheet. Drop the "RL" model name, and create a new one for the RL-replacement. Let's say "ZLX".
This way, the "ZLX" will now appear to the auto market as a completely new Acura model class, and has absolutely no relationship whatsoever to the poorly performed RL model. Any bad aftertaste resulting from the RL model is erased forever from memory.
Now that the "ZLX" has a fresh start, and thus can set the price tag freely.
#3360
Racer
When the Lexus LS first came out at $40K, it was first well received, then the price continued to increase to today's level.
Remember that the RL model has yet to overcome the $50K price barrier, and it's sales figure spells out that the RL is neither popular nor well received. So a big jump on the price tag is never a good idea, before the RL/RLX name is established and received well.
One other method is to give the RL-replacement a clean sheet. Drop the "RL" model name, and create a new one for the RL-replacement. Let's say "ZLX".
This way, the "ZLX" will now appear to the auto market as a completely new Acura model class, and has absolutely no relationship whatsoever to the poorly performed RL model. Any bad aftertaste resulting from the RL model is erased forever from memory.
Now that the "ZLX" has a fresh start, and thus can set the price tag freely.
Remember that the RL model has yet to overcome the $50K price barrier, and it's sales figure spells out that the RL is neither popular nor well received. So a big jump on the price tag is never a good idea, before the RL/RLX name is established and received well.
One other method is to give the RL-replacement a clean sheet. Drop the "RL" model name, and create a new one for the RL-replacement. Let's say "ZLX".
This way, the "ZLX" will now appear to the auto market as a completely new Acura model class, and has absolutely no relationship whatsoever to the poorly performed RL model. Any bad aftertaste resulting from the RL model is erased forever from memory.
Now that the "ZLX" has a fresh start, and thus can set the price tag freely.
I think they should change the name completely and wash there hands of RL and start fresh with a new flagship.
If the new flagship scores well against the competition in reviews then the name, price, design(cause this is personal) and brand will be less of an issue for purchasers. $65k for a top of the line best in class car would make it a good deal.
I am more of a value guy than a name or prestige guy. anyone going after prestige would not buy an acura imho.