K-Tuner available for 2019 RDX
#401
Drifting
I admittedly don't know anything about creating apps, but I have heard it is much easier to get one approved for the Google Play Store than the Apple version. Just hearsay at this point, however.
#402
Racer
As I've been told by the KTuner folks, or I read on their forums somewhere, it has to do with the limitations of bluetooth in iOS. Apparently there are limited permissions allowed in iOS, versus the "wild west" of Android, that don't allow for making the app.
The following users liked this post:
KSeriesTuner (07-24-2020)
#403
Interesting JB in AZ I had heard the opposite that it was better to create in iOS, that's why most apps first arrive in iOS and latter on android platform, but I had not heard of issues with Bluetooth.
#404
Drifting
A quick Google search provided a website with this info:
Google vs Apple play store
Many apps get rejected on the first try, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing. The App Store's efficient app review team gives the developer clear feedback about why their app didn't make the cut. Developers might be frustrated in the short term, but ultimately become more skilled at mobile app creation.
Google vs Apple play store
"...APP STORE
When developing for the iOS App Store, the biggest problem developers face is getting their app approved. It's not easy to get an app into the App Store. Apps can be rejected for slight errors, which can be frustrating for developers who have specific ideas about how their apps should look and function. Developers have to take a great deal of time and care to make sure their apps fit Apple's standards and rules.Many apps get rejected on the first try, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing. The App Store's efficient app review team gives the developer clear feedback about why their app didn't make the cut. Developers might be frustrated in the short term, but ultimately become more skilled at mobile app creation.
GOOGLE PLAY STORE
Getting an app into the Google Play Store is an easier process. Apps have a low chance of being rejected on the Android app platform. This avoids the frustration App Store developers face and leaves developers free to experiment with their ideas...."
#405
Expanse me
A quick Google search provided a website with this info:
Google vs Apple play store
Many apps get rejected on the first try, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing. The App Store's efficient app review team gives the developer clear feedback about why their app didn't make the cut. Developers might be frustrated in the short term, but ultimately become more skilled at mobile app creation.
Google vs Apple play store
"...APP STORE
When developing for the iOS App Store, the biggest problem developers face is getting their app approved. It's not easy to get an app into the App Store. Apps can be rejected for slight errors, which can be frustrating for developers who have specific ideas about how their apps should look and function. Developers have to take a great deal of time and care to make sure their apps fit Apple's standards and rules.Many apps get rejected on the first try, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing. The App Store's efficient app review team gives the developer clear feedback about why their app didn't make the cut. Developers might be frustrated in the short term, but ultimately become more skilled at mobile app creation.
GOOGLE PLAY STORE
Getting an app into the Google Play Store is an easier process. Apps have a low chance of being rejected on the Android app platform. This avoids the frustration App Store developers face and leaves developers free to experiment with their ideas...."Its The Wild West on google,
the same reason I moved to iOS years ago. Too much potential for malware, leaky code, etc .
Still, thinking about getting a cheap Android tablet just for the burn.
I already have a WiFi plug and two apps on iOS that do a great job monitoring the engine, but being able to just plug in and burn a variety of profiles is inviting.
#407
Drifting
to answer the question -
Its The Wild West on google,
the same reason I moved to iOS years ago. Too much potential for malware, leaky code, etc .
Still, thinking about getting a cheap Android tablet just for the burn.
I already have a WiFi plug and two apps on iOS that do a great job monitoring the engine, but being able to just plug in and burn a variety of profiles is inviting.
Its The Wild West on google,
the same reason I moved to iOS years ago. Too much potential for malware, leaky code, etc .
Still, thinking about getting a cheap Android tablet just for the burn.
I already have a WiFi plug and two apps on iOS that do a great job monitoring the engine, but being able to just plug in and burn a variety of profiles is inviting.
#408
Expanse me
V 1.2 is simply a Bluetooth plug and a line to your laptop. After installing ktuner s/w on your laptop, you connect the line and burn the ECU.
V 2 is actually a unit, like a handheld gaming unit, that burns the ECU directly. You get the unit, a line, and the bluetooth plug. You can also monitor the vehicle from the handheld unit as you drive with the V2.
#409
Expanse me
1.0.9.9 Ktuner is out
Ktune 1.0.9.9 is out. no RDX additions listed.
Version 1.0.9.9
V1.2 Firmware Update.
Version 1.0.9.9
V1.2 Firmware Update.
- 2020 Type-R Support
- 2020 Type-R Support
Civic 1.5T - Initial Support Added For 5AA-C1x
- Initial Support Added For 5AH-P5x
- Initial Support Added For 5AJ-J6x
- Full Support Added For 5AN-CCx
- Full Support Added For 5AN-CRx
- Full Support Added For 5AN-K5x
Civic Type-R - 2020 Type-R Support
Civic 2.0 NA - Initial Support Added For 5BA-A5x
Accord 1.5T - Initial Support Added For 6A0-95x
- Initial Support Added For 6A0-97x
CRV 1.5T - Initial Support Added For 5PA-98x
Accord V6 13-16 - Initial Support Added For 5G0-B0x
#412
Only Bluetooth Low Energy is supported on iOS devices without the use of the security chips, but they have limits that aren't appealing for what we are doing. We'll likely never switch to BLE for those reasons.
#413
Expanse me
Unless Apple opens up bluetooth support, which is not likely, it'll never be able to communicate with any of our devices. They decided charging extra for their "Security Chip" was more important than allowing developers open bluetooth access. That's why I moved away from iPhone years ago and I'll likely never return. Extremely sad for me because all of my computers are Apple and I was a long time supporter.
Only Bluetooth Low Energy is supported on iOS devices without the use of the security chips, but they have limits that aren't appealing for what we are doing. We'll likely never switch to BLE for those reasons.
Only Bluetooth Low Energy is supported on iOS devices without the use of the security chips, but they have limits that aren't appealing for what we are doing. We'll likely never switch to BLE for those reasons.
#414
If you're talking about Apple you're absolutely correct. Money.
The only reason they likely haven't opened up the Serial Port Protocol of bluetooth is because it would piss off companies who have been purchasing millions of those "security chips" over the years.
I can understand the need for the MFi program for devices that are physically connected to the phone, but not a bluetooth device that's never physically connected.
Anyway, no point in arguing over this one... Apple's the only one who can change it and they likely never will.
The only reason they likely haven't opened up the Serial Port Protocol of bluetooth is because it would piss off companies who have been purchasing millions of those "security chips" over the years.
I can understand the need for the MFi program for devices that are physically connected to the phone, but not a bluetooth device that's never physically connected.
Anyway, no point in arguing over this one... Apple's the only one who can change it and they likely never will.
#415
If I purchase the KTuner V2, will I still need a Windows enabled laptop to obtain the tuning maps, or can I download directly to the V2 unit? Thanks to all for this helpful thread for those of us looking to tune.
#417
Considering the RDX is not an Type S (yet)....I must admit that the unveiling of the HP and torque of the new TLX S makes KTuner Stage 2 pretty impressive....and kinda gets the RDX somewhat close to those Type-S numbers...I mean for a compact SUV, that's some impressive stuff.
#418
Considering the RDX is not an Type S (yet)....I must admit that the unveiling of the HP and torque of the new TLX S makes KTuner Stage 2 pretty impressive....and kinda gets the RDX somewhat close to those Type-S numbers...I mean for a compact SUV, that's some impressive stuff.
The following users liked this post:
Funz51 (08-04-2020)
#419
Apologies if this has been covered in the thread - but I did not find much to this effect:
How "safe" has this tune been seen to be?
and
How quickly will Acura void your warranty if you run it?
I love the SH-AWD and the RDX itself, but it's still WAY laggier than my 2015 Subaru Forester XT. There just isn't pickup off the line. The thread suggests this tune fixes that, but it's a daily driver and I do not want to go ruining the transmission or engine or AWD for a bit of a butt-dyno boost.
Thanks!
How "safe" has this tune been seen to be?
and
How quickly will Acura void your warranty if you run it?
I love the SH-AWD and the RDX itself, but it's still WAY laggier than my 2015 Subaru Forester XT. There just isn't pickup off the line. The thread suggests this tune fixes that, but it's a daily driver and I do not want to go ruining the transmission or engine or AWD for a bit of a butt-dyno boost.
Thanks!
The following 2 users liked this post by Speed Guy:
Padre Dave (09-09-2020),
SpaceBot (09-06-2020)
#420
Expanse me
Apologies if this has been covered in the thread - but I did not find much to this effect:
How "safe" has this tune been seen to be?
and
How quickly will Acura void your warranty if you run it?
I love the SH-AWD and the RDX itself, but it's still WAY laggier than my 2015 Subaru Forester XT. There just isn't pickup off the line. The thread suggests this tune fixes that, but it's a daily driver and I do not want to go ruining the transmission or engine or AWD for a bit of a butt-dyno boost.
Thanks!
How "safe" has this tune been seen to be?
and
How quickly will Acura void your warranty if you run it?
I love the SH-AWD and the RDX itself, but it's still WAY laggier than my 2015 Subaru Forester XT. There just isn't pickup off the line. The thread suggests this tune fixes that, but it's a daily driver and I do not want to go ruining the transmission or engine or AWD for a bit of a butt-dyno boost.
Thanks!
The warranty has many opinions on here on multiple threads. If need to bring it in for service, I will just burn it back to OEM. Takes me 10 minutes. It gets complicated however if you get stuck and get it towed. But having 20 minutes with your baby before you give it over to the service Dept in that situation is just enough time to burn it back. I read where someone did that. Funny. Something I would do, lol.
The delay does not go away with the burn. It gets better. Still, just a tap on your right paddle anytime you feel that you cannot afford a delay works, at least for me.
There is a law, which I have reposted months ago that contests the void of warranty when changing software.
But Acura just emailed out a month ago a kind of statement of clarification that says anything you touch or change on the car must be Acura approved or they will not provide help or assistance. Take it for what it's worth.
That's as much as I know, any more takers on defining these two issues?
The following users liked this post:
KSeriesTuner (09-16-2020)
#421
Long term experiences?
Well, I’ve read the entire thread here (thanks for all the great comments), and I’m about to pull the trigger on the V2. Just wanted to ask for any last feedback from anyone who’s been running it for a while… I have 27+ thousand miles on my 2020 RDX. And I will keep up the same rate of driving. I’m hoping to get at least 200,000 mi out of it over the next 7 years or so.
My only main concern is if running the stage 2 will affect the long-term reliability of the engine. I’m sure it’ll decrease its absolute maximum life, but my personal experience with Honda engines has seen over 300,000 if they’re taken care of.
So, any personal experiences or anecdotes of people who have run a tune for the life of an engine with that many miles? Any problems?
Thanks!
My only main concern is if running the stage 2 will affect the long-term reliability of the engine. I’m sure it’ll decrease its absolute maximum life, but my personal experience with Honda engines has seen over 300,000 if they’re taken care of.
So, any personal experiences or anecdotes of people who have run a tune for the life of an engine with that many miles? Any problems?
Thanks!
#422
You can check the Accord forums too since those were out before the RDX, but nobody has had reliability issues with our platform. I would say verify you're not in the fuel pump recall range.
The following 5 users liked this post by KSeriesTuner:
Funz51 (09-30-2020),
Hobie (10-05-2020),
markm929 (09-30-2020),
Padre Dave (07-02-2021),
SpaceBot (10-01-2020)
#423
User Awaiting Email Confirmation
As long as you're doing proper maintenance (ie: sooner than the MMI) for a modded car, the engine should last quite a while, especially with the stock turbo. Also, a canned tune is generally much milder than a custom tune, due to the fact that it needs to be unless the tuner wants to get a reputation for blowing motors ... you just can't get as aggressive when making a cookie-cutter tune. The issues you'll have, and are just as expensive, are going to be with the turbo and drivetrain. The transmission is a big question mark, and asking for more boost from the turbo is going to shorten its lifespan significantly. If you're not prepared for this, don't mod ... simple as that. Like everything else in the universe, it's a give and take. You can't have increased power without sacrificing something else. No, your turbo isn't going to eat it after 50k miles, but you likely aren't getting 150k out of it either with a Stage 2 tune and running it hard from time to time (why else would you put a tune on it). Transmission may hold up just fine, but again, it's a risk you're going to have to take seeing as it's unknown territory.
As for warranty, a tune will 100% void your warranty. No, the Magnuson-Moss Act will not cover you. Again, repeat after me, the Magnuson-Moss Act will not cover you. The mindless twits who harp on this have no idea what this law actually entails. It was put into place because manufacturers were voiding warranties for aftermarket parts. Manufacturers were getting warranty claims for blown motors, would do their inspection and then refuse warranty because the owner used an aftermarket oil or air filter. This does not mean you can throw a tune that messes with the ECU programming of the car, making more power, and expect the manufacturer to warranty the motor if something goes wrong. Sure, take them to court and you will lose. This Act was put into place to prevent manufacturers on basically having a monopoly on service parts, as it would scare people away from using aftermarket parts for simple service items. It does not cover aftermarket performance parts. Yes, they still have to prove that it was the cause of the failure, but an ECU tune can be pointed at for literally anything that goes wrong in the powertrain. You can flash it back to stock, but most manufacturers can still tell the ECU has been messed with. All will refuse warranty work if this is the case and I know at least BMW will not give you CPO status, thus decreasing the value when you trade it in. The dealer may turn a blind eye to your mod(s) to keep your business, especially if you've been a good customer and do a lot of service there, but don't bank on it. When you mod, assume the risks ... don't be a child and expect somebody else to pay for your blunders.
I'm not saying not to mod ... I've blown a motor on my supercharged LS2. I didn't cry that GM wouldn't replace my motor. I also eventually plan to throw a Stage 2 in the RDX in a year or so, once I know everything that could go wrong with the powertrain would have gone wrong by then, so less risk is assumed. Just take accountability when things get fucked up. Pay to play, it's the name of the game when modding. If you don't like taking the risk, don't touch it. Just do appearance mods and call it a day.
As for warranty, a tune will 100% void your warranty. No, the Magnuson-Moss Act will not cover you. Again, repeat after me, the Magnuson-Moss Act will not cover you. The mindless twits who harp on this have no idea what this law actually entails. It was put into place because manufacturers were voiding warranties for aftermarket parts. Manufacturers were getting warranty claims for blown motors, would do their inspection and then refuse warranty because the owner used an aftermarket oil or air filter. This does not mean you can throw a tune that messes with the ECU programming of the car, making more power, and expect the manufacturer to warranty the motor if something goes wrong. Sure, take them to court and you will lose. This Act was put into place to prevent manufacturers on basically having a monopoly on service parts, as it would scare people away from using aftermarket parts for simple service items. It does not cover aftermarket performance parts. Yes, they still have to prove that it was the cause of the failure, but an ECU tune can be pointed at for literally anything that goes wrong in the powertrain. You can flash it back to stock, but most manufacturers can still tell the ECU has been messed with. All will refuse warranty work if this is the case and I know at least BMW will not give you CPO status, thus decreasing the value when you trade it in. The dealer may turn a blind eye to your mod(s) to keep your business, especially if you've been a good customer and do a lot of service there, but don't bank on it. When you mod, assume the risks ... don't be a child and expect somebody else to pay for your blunders.
I'm not saying not to mod ... I've blown a motor on my supercharged LS2. I didn't cry that GM wouldn't replace my motor. I also eventually plan to throw a Stage 2 in the RDX in a year or so, once I know everything that could go wrong with the powertrain would have gone wrong by then, so less risk is assumed. Just take accountability when things get fucked up. Pay to play, it's the name of the game when modding. If you don't like taking the risk, don't touch it. Just do appearance mods and call it a day.
Last edited by leomio85; 09-30-2020 at 03:55 PM.
#424
I spoke with Acura service department in my area yesterday. The service rep also flashes his car with a tune, but says he always just flashes back to stock and removed any aftermarket tuning equipment before taking it in to service . He's had no issue doing this.
The following 3 users liked this post by SpaceBot:
#425
Racer
![Talking](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
I plan to leave the Stage 2 tune in place when I finally get my VIN/ECU mismatch issue resolved......sheesh. Since I haven’t been able to get any updates because of this issue, they will likely override some of the KTuner settings, so I will reflash Stage 2 when I get it back.
I pray this helps someone. Stay safe and God bless all of you!
The following 3 users liked this post by Padre Dave:
#426
User Awaiting Email Confirmation
I discovered a challenge when tuning my previous car, a Mazdaspeed3. When I took the car in for emissions testing in Arizona, I flashed the ECU back to stock. When they plugged in the OBD the car had no history recorded so they had to do a tailpipe test. The next time I needed to have it checked, I went in with the tune and it passed with flying colors, whatever that means.
I plan to leave the Stage 2 tune in place when I finally get my VIN/ECU mismatch issue resolved......sheesh. Since I haven’t been able to get any updates because of this issue, they will likely override some of the KTuner settings, so I will reflash Stage 2 when I get it back.
I pray this helps someone. Stay safe and God bless all of you!
I plan to leave the Stage 2 tune in place when I finally get my VIN/ECU mismatch issue resolved......sheesh. Since I haven’t been able to get any updates because of this issue, they will likely override some of the KTuner settings, so I will reflash Stage 2 when I get it back.
I pray this helps someone. Stay safe and God bless all of you!
If you're taking your car in for service, there's no reason to flash it back to stock, unless they're going to be doing something looking specifically at the ECU. It's not like they're going to hook into the computer and it'll prompt a 'WARNING: Vehicle is running an aftermarket tune! Void Warranty, Will Robinson!" message. But, if they're investigating a blown motor, they will delve deeper into things that could potentially cause this ... and looking closely at the ECU will reveal its been tampered with. People don't seem to understand this ... and say, "well, I bring it in for oil changes and I've never had them detect my tune, I'm safe." Sure, ok. It doesn't even seem KTuner knows their ass from their face in this regard. I'm sure they make a decent tune, as I haven't heard anyone popping their motors from their tunes ... but, well, I'll hold my tongue. I ran across a story (so take it for what you will) about a guy who was going to get a motor replaced by their dealer, but Honda sent out a specialist to crack into the ECU and even though it was flashed back to stock, discovered higher boost demanded from the turbo than factory setting and warranty was denied because of the aftermarket tune. Again, they're not going to be able to say, "Ha! We discovered you were running a Hondata Stage 2! DENIED!" But, they'll know you messed with the ECU in some fashion.
Again, if you want to mod, just keep in the back of your mind that you could be footing a hefty repair bill ... because the manufacturer, if capable, isn't going to warranty the failed part, nor will the tuning company. Some people, including myself, are willing to assume that risk. Others, maybe not so much.
The following users liked this post:
Oil Stain (10-05-2020)
#427
Instructor
That's because when you flash back to stock, it will likely clear your I/M monitors as well. You will fail an OBDII emissions test this way because it uses those monitors to test the emissions systems of the vehicle. Many people think they're slick finding out they can clear a CEL by clearing it with a scantool or disconnecting their battery, but this also clears the I/M monitors and they getting pissy when they fail their inspection test. This is also a very easy way to tell you were messing around with something you shouldn't have.
If you're taking your car in for service, there's no reason to flash it back to stock, unless they're going to be doing something looking specifically at the ECU. It's not like they're going to hook into the computer and it'll prompt a 'WARNING: Vehicle is running an aftermarket tune! Void Warranty, Will Robinson!" message. But, if they're investigating a blown motor, they will delve deeper into things that could potentially cause this ... and looking closely at the ECU will reveal its been tampered with. People don't seem to understand this ... and say, "well, I bring it in for oil changes and I've never had them detect my tune, I'm safe." Sure, ok. It doesn't even seem KTuner knows their ass from their face in this regard. I'm sure they make a decent tune, as I haven't heard anyone popping their motors from their tunes ... but, well, I'll hold my tongue. I ran across a story (so take it for what you will) about a guy who was going to get a motor replaced by their dealer, but Honda sent out a specialist to crack into the ECU and even though it was flashed back to stock, discovered higher boost demanded from the turbo than factory setting and warranty was denied because of the aftermarket tune. Again, they're not going to be able to say, "Ha! We discovered you were running a Hondata Stage 2! DENIED!" But, they'll know you messed with the ECU in some fashion.
Again, if you want to mod, just keep in the back of your mind that you could be footing a hefty repair bill ... because the manufacturer, if capable, isn't going to warranty the failed part, nor will the tuning company. Some people, including myself, are willing to assume that risk. Others, maybe not so much.
If you're taking your car in for service, there's no reason to flash it back to stock, unless they're going to be doing something looking specifically at the ECU. It's not like they're going to hook into the computer and it'll prompt a 'WARNING: Vehicle is running an aftermarket tune! Void Warranty, Will Robinson!" message. But, if they're investigating a blown motor, they will delve deeper into things that could potentially cause this ... and looking closely at the ECU will reveal its been tampered with. People don't seem to understand this ... and say, "well, I bring it in for oil changes and I've never had them detect my tune, I'm safe." Sure, ok. It doesn't even seem KTuner knows their ass from their face in this regard. I'm sure they make a decent tune, as I haven't heard anyone popping their motors from their tunes ... but, well, I'll hold my tongue. I ran across a story (so take it for what you will) about a guy who was going to get a motor replaced by their dealer, but Honda sent out a specialist to crack into the ECU and even though it was flashed back to stock, discovered higher boost demanded from the turbo than factory setting and warranty was denied because of the aftermarket tune. Again, they're not going to be able to say, "Ha! We discovered you were running a Hondata Stage 2! DENIED!" But, they'll know you messed with the ECU in some fashion.
Again, if you want to mod, just keep in the back of your mind that you could be footing a hefty repair bill ... because the manufacturer, if capable, isn't going to warranty the failed part, nor will the tuning company. Some people, including myself, are willing to assume that risk. Others, maybe not so much.
#428
I installed the stage 2 ktuner back in January or whenever it became available. Install is a breeze it just requires a cable from your obd port to your laptop. Has to be windows. Takes about 20 minutes and your done. Completely different car. Turbo lag is all but gone, pulls hard through the rpms. I couldn’t imagine ever going back to stock. Well worth it.
#429
Racer
The following 3 users liked this post by Padre Dave:
#430
#431
Racer
The following 2 users liked this post by Padre Dave:
Hobie (11-11-2020),
KSeriesTuner (11-11-2020)
The following users liked this post:
KSeriesTuner (11-13-2020)
#435
For those who already running older versions, are they notified by Ktuner to update? Or do they just need to check on their own for updates? I imagine it would just be a download from their website, and then just re-flashing?
#436
Expanse me
if I am missing something, please someone speak up.
thx.
The following users liked this post:
Hobie (11-11-2020)
#437
This hasn't been pushed out as an official update notification yet, but anyone who downloads can use it!
If you don't want to change any settings there's no reason to reflash the vehicle.
If you don't want to change any settings there's no reason to reflash the vehicle.
#438
Instructor
Forgive me, it's been a while. I'm seeing my version to be 1.0.9.8. I have the Ktuner connected to my laptop (ver 1.2) and I do a check update and it returns and says I have the latest version. Do I need to have it connected to the car?
#439
Expanse me
go to ktuner website and download the latest version and install. i find that the automatic update notify in the app does not work. you should be getting 1.0.9.10. you dont connect to the car to download software, but just an internet connection. after you download the software, then connect to the car. The software that you download has everything it needs to burn your car.
#440
Instructor
go to ktuner website and download the latest version and install. i find that the automatic update notify in the app does not work. you should be getting 1.0.9.10. you dont connect to the car to download software, but just an internet connection. after you download the software, then connect to the car. The software that you download has everything it needs to burn your car.