zeta

iTrader: (1)

No, I did not, in Nexson's words, 'report 'him. His PM, that I quoted in post 196 reaks of an accusation, period. I will defend myself when unjustly challenged. Because the FACT is no one knows what happened AND anyone could have used the information in post 162 and 'ratted' him out (your words).

At best, the factual information depicted in post 162, that was soley ment as informative data, went unanswered by Nexson until last night when the PM was sent and this thread got renewed life after 5 weeks.
Could it, post 162, have been used as a portal for SOMEONE to call, possibly.

The link embedded was used to back up the quote in regards to 'overspray'. Unfortunately, for me, this is the result. Take my defensiveness how you like, but hear this, I will and have a right to defend myself when unjustly assaulted until this thread is locked by a Mod.

Moreover, I don't see Nexson posting statements like '...a paint booth in a residential dwelling is illegal, as I was advised.' (YoutubeComment to dsmnick314), in this thread. Furthermore, I don't hear him addressing the Safety concerns associated with the info. I commented on in post 162. Why so silent?? Anyone could have clicked on his video links and be taken straight to his youtube channel where he documented his work.

Finally, I do not believe for one minute that "feigning ingnorance' and claiming he did not have a basic common sense understanding of the dangers of what he was doing are accurate. That's a denial to thick to penetrate in this thread and it won't work.

CLtotheTL32

iTrader: (3)

zeta why are you taking Brian's hobby like a personal attack? You are so riled up about his business practices when it doesn't affect you whatsoever.

Steven Bell

iTrader: (2)

Guys, there is a lot of finger pointing going on here and not as many facts.

At the request of the original poster, Brian, I am closing this thread.