Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

C&P Random Thread -

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-16-2013, 08:32 PM
  #5761  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
can't believe I missed that post from leftride.
Old 01-16-2013, 09:37 PM
  #5762  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,404
Received 2,890 Likes on 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by asianspec
yea. actually. its not for my purposes. i was going to use the flashes as props for a wedding and wanted to be sure that he knew what he was doing. so that the extra power won't overexpose his shots.
if it's from a different angle, and same distance, same light modifiers (if any), aiming at the same spot, then I would say yes. BUT suppose one is further than the other, then remember the "Inverse Square Law"
even at the same power, the light drops as the distance increases.
Old 01-16-2013, 11:06 PM
  #5763  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Sweet! Is this DCist?
Old 01-17-2013, 05:10 AM
  #5764  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
Sweet! Is this DCist?
Old 01-17-2013, 06:45 AM
  #5765  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
if it's from a different angle, and same distance, same light modifiers (if any), aiming at the same spot, then I would say yes. BUT suppose one is further than the other, then remember the "Inverse Square Law""Inverse Square Law" even at the same power, the light drops as the distance increases.
Ah thanks man. No diffusers are going to be used though

I did a little test and even though my 430ex is older than the yongnuo yn560 it does better in syncing and recycle time is faster. In 6 shots using cowboy studio triggers the 430 fired on all 6 but the yongnuo only fired twice. Not knocking on the yongnuo since its a good flash on a budget. A yn560 and external battery pack is about 90 bucks on amazon which is good if you are shooting with just hotshoe flashes on a softbox.

I just need a 28" soft box and I am good to go
Old 01-17-2013, 08:19 AM
  #5766  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by einsatz
Congratulations!!
Old 01-17-2013, 09:28 AM
  #5767  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,404
Received 2,890 Likes on 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by asianspec
Ah thanks man. No diffusers are going to be used though

I did a little test and even though my 430ex is older than the yongnuo yn560 it does better in syncing and recycle time is faster. In 6 shots using cowboy studio triggers the 430 fired on all 6 but the yongnuo only fired twice. Not knocking on the yongnuo since its a good flash on a budget. A yn560 and external battery pack is about 90 bucks on amazon which is good if you are shooting with just hotshoe flashes on a softbox.

I just need a 28" soft box and I am good to go
Hmmmm, I'm wondering if both @1/64 are they putting out the same power since they have different guide numbers. You should test it out with the light meter.
Old 01-17-2013, 10:41 AM
  #5768  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,336
Received 10,389 Likes on 5,285 Posts
Originally Posted by einsatz
Well that's about to change... I was one of the winners of a local blog photo contest and will be displaying a photo at a gallery in DC

They're suggesting mpix.com for printing - has anyone use them before? It has to be acid-free, archival paper... not sure if WHCC does that?
nice congrats.... so are you gonna tell us which pic or do we get to stand here with our mouths agape, for the rest of the week...
Old 01-17-2013, 01:25 PM
  #5769  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,404
Received 2,890 Likes on 1,433 Posts
Sigma 19mm and 30mm on sale for $199 (for both!!)

for Sony NEX



for Olympus M43
Old 01-17-2013, 04:49 PM
  #5770  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
nice congrats.... so are you gonna tell us which pic or do we get to stand here with our mouths agape, for the rest of the week...
Thanks! It was this one:



And today Getty picked another photo of mine for their Editorial collection! It's from the 2009 inauguration:


The following 3 users liked this post by einsatz:
asianspec (01-17-2013), srika (01-18-2013), wndrlst (01-18-2013)
Old 01-17-2013, 05:09 PM
  #5771  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,336
Received 10,389 Likes on 5,285 Posts
lovely - nice job.
Old 01-18-2013, 01:59 AM
  #5772  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,336
Received 10,389 Likes on 5,285 Posts
intended...

actual

Old 01-18-2013, 02:05 AM
  #5773  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,336
Received 10,389 Likes on 5,285 Posts
more here:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/the-a...es-of-all-time
Old 01-18-2013, 07:44 AM
  #5774  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,605
Received 6,210 Likes on 3,983 Posts
When buying a used lens....Do you guys think there is a downside to getting a NON USM lens?

Old 01-18-2013, 08:44 AM
  #5775  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Which lens?. From my experience I had no problem.
Old 01-18-2013, 11:11 AM
  #5776  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,605
Received 6,210 Likes on 3,983 Posts
This
http://www.ebay.com/itm/EX-CANON-EF-...item35c33b9c21
Old 01-18-2013, 11:21 AM
  #5777  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Me personally I don't like its coming from out of the country.

Check if this guy still has it

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...ighlight=100mm
Old 01-18-2013, 11:24 AM
  #5778  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Nvm he did. But I would look on potn before ebay
Old 01-18-2013, 11:33 AM
  #5779  
Creepy guy in the mirror.
 
JLatimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 55
Posts: 2,631
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
It is just a question of noise and focus speed. The non-USM motor is gonna be noisier and slower than the USM. Depends on if it matters for you.
Old 01-18-2013, 11:36 AM
  #5780  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
If you are using it for macro check if the front element goes in or out when focusing.

the USM version doesn't. Not sure about the non-USM.
Old 01-18-2013, 11:41 AM
  #5781  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,605
Received 6,210 Likes on 3,983 Posts
Thanks Guys. I think the lens does extend on the NON USM example. The AF is slower and noisier too.

I'll stick with a US model rather than pay less, and take the chance on it not being what i want it to be.
Old 01-18-2013, 11:42 AM
  #5782  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
Nvm it does get longer

Optically there is very little difference between the 100mm macro USM and non-USM. The bigeest difference is that the USM version does not get physically longer when focusing closer. The non-USM version of the 100mm macro gets nearly twice as long physically when focused at 1:1 than when focused at infinity. The non-USM version gets physically longer the closer you focus the lens.

This is a decided disadvantage when trying to light your subject with natural light and/or flash. You can use a ringlite with both lenses but a ringlite delivers flat and unattractive lighting.

Also, since working distance is measured by Canon, from the film/sensor plane, the USM macro will allow for a greater working distance from the front of the lens to the subject being photographed. The USM version of the 100mm macro lens has decided advantages over the non-USM and is well worth the price difference between a used 100mm non-USM lens and the current 100mm USM macro lens.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=452037
Old 01-18-2013, 11:43 AM
  #5783  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,605
Received 6,210 Likes on 3,983 Posts
Originally Posted by asianspec
Nvm he did. But I would look on potn before ebay


I've already gotten 3-4 items from people over there. Good guys it seems.
Old 01-18-2013, 12:18 PM
  #5784  
Creepy guy in the mirror.
 
JLatimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 55
Posts: 2,631
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
Thanks Guys. I think the lens does extend on the NON USM example. The AF is slower and noisier too.

I'll stick with a US model rather than pay less, and take the chance on it not being what i want it to be.
Sorry if I am stating the obvious. USM does not have anything to do with country of origin. It stands for Ultrasonic Motor.
The following users liked this post:
pttl (01-18-2013)
Old 01-18-2013, 12:24 PM
  #5785  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,605
Received 6,210 Likes on 3,983 Posts
Old 01-18-2013, 12:25 PM
  #5786  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,605
Received 6,210 Likes on 3,983 Posts
Originally Posted by JLatimer
Sorry if I am stating the obvious. USM does not have anything to do with country of origin. It stands for Ultrasonic Motor.
I was thinking "imported" as in - there is no US warranty. Oy-vey.
Old 01-18-2013, 12:58 PM
  #5787  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Originally Posted by JLatimer
Sorry if I am stating the obvious. USM does not have anything to do with country of origin. It stands for Ultrasonic Motor.
i saw it. was like

Yea with a USM lens, you don't hear the lens working when its auto focusing.


btw FYI, white lenses don't consider a person "professional"
Old 01-18-2013, 04:30 PM
  #5788  
Creepy guy in the mirror.
 
JLatimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 55
Posts: 2,631
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by asianspec
btw FYI, white lenses don't consider a person "professional"
Agreed. I have a white lens and I have taken some awful photos. And I have seen some phenomenal photos with a kit lens.
Old 01-20-2013, 06:02 PM
  #5789  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,336
Received 10,389 Likes on 5,285 Posts
the next time you question why battery grips cost so much, have a look at how much Leica charges for their M9 "grip" - this is ONLY a grip - it does not hold batteries.

http://www.adorama.com/LCHGMM.html
Old 01-20-2013, 06:19 PM
  #5790  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,404
Received 2,890 Likes on 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
the next time you question why battery grips cost so much, have a look at how much Leica charges for their M9 "grip" - this is ONLY a grip - it does not hold batteries.

http://www.adorama.com/LCHGMM.html
there'll be 3rd party eBay models for $30
Old 01-23-2013, 06:44 PM
  #5791  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
Originally Posted by leftride
I use MPIX pretty much exclusively. I've done a few gallery wraps (canvas) with them as gifts and have been really impressed. Their customer service and packaging is awesome. I highly recommend them.
I had them print 2 shots on regular paper and 2 on metallic. I can only use the regular paper on the show, but I wanted to see how it'd look on the metallic paper and I have to say the photo looks fantastic on metallic paper. I'm happy enough with the quality.

They have a 50% off deal certain sizes ending today with code FB50off

Last edited by einsatz; 01-23-2013 at 06:49 PM.
Old 01-24-2013, 01:01 AM
  #5792  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,404
Received 2,890 Likes on 1,433 Posts
have you guys seen this? It's by Sunbounce call the "Bounce Wall"... so it's like you have a wall to bounce your flashgun everywhere you go

Old 01-24-2013, 02:05 AM
  #5793  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts


That's just silly looking,

It's like that one guy that made a setup where the 2 flashes were sticking over his left and right shoulder, like old school rabbit ear antennas.

If that makes sense.
Old 01-24-2013, 02:17 AM
  #5794  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,404
Received 2,890 Likes on 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse


That's just silly looking,

It's like that one guy that made a setup where the 2 flashes were sticking over his left and right shoulder, like old school rabbit ear antennas.

If that makes sense.
I don't think it's a bad idea, because I HAVE seen people hold a speedlite with one hand, stretched out (slaved)... But for $125 (B&H), I'd rather just put a big bounce card on the flash and use the technique of holding the flash out with one hand, and deal with the camera with the other.
Old 01-24-2013, 01:23 PM
  #5795  
i want to ride my bicycle
iTrader: (1)
 
leftride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: denver, co
Age: 43
Posts: 3,598
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by einsatz
can't believe I missed that post from leftride.
just did another set of prints from them...3x 36"x24" gallery wraps...wasn't cheap, but i think they turned out awesome.

I'll post them up one i get them hung.
Old 01-24-2013, 01:55 PM
  #5796  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
I'm just going to take my cheapo dolica monopod and use a speedlite and "28 softbox
Old 01-27-2013, 12:39 AM
  #5797  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
Interesting....... may really look into this.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/....php?t=1270039

Originally Posted by tetrode
I haven’t been posting much here on POTN recently but did want to bring a new piece of flash gear to the attention of POTN’ers. If a powerful, bare bulb, remotely-controllable, non-TTL flash sounds interesting, read on.

Let’s get the disclaimer out of the way first: I’ve been working with Edward Tang of CheetahStand as a beta tester of his new CL-180 flash for the better part of a year now. I have absolutely no financial involvement with this product whatsoever and do not stand to profit from it in any way. Edward is a friend and I help him out with product development and testing every so often purely as a friend. As this flash can be viewed as a successor to the greatly missed “Sunpak 120J, I thought the soon-to-be available Cheetah Light CL-180 might be of interest to forum readers.

So what we have here is a shoe-mountable flash unit somewhat larger than a Nikon SB-910 or Canon 600EX. The Cheetah CL-180 is rated at a bit over 150Ws of power; slightly more than a Quantum QFlash. It’s a bare bulb unit as mentioned above and is able to accept a variety of head-mounted accessories which includes a standard 5” reflector, two types of snoot, folding 19” octabox/beauty dish, and a cleverly designed umbrella holder with dedicated reflector. It is also compatible with virtually all existing Quantum/Lumedyne mount accessories. The only exceptions I’ve encountered are the Lumedyne snoot and the Lumedyne ANEC mount adapter. The diameter of these two accessories is fractionally too large for the CL-180.

An additional potentially attractive accessory which I was unable to test is the Cells II transmitter. The Cells II enables high speed sync with Canon cameras.

Here's the flash with radio receiver and umbrella mount, battery pack, and transmitter:



Power output of the flash can be varied from 1:1 down to 1:128 in third stops using the rotating dial on the back of the unit. A focus assist lamp and audible recycle alert are also provided.

The accessory of greatest interest would have to be the radio transceiver set. The small receiver plugs into the side of the flash while the transmitter sits in the camera hotshoe. The transmitter can control various flash functions but, most noteworthy, is its ability to control flash power. The current flash power setting can be seen on the transmitter’s backlit LCD screen. Range is very good. The flash triggered reliably at unobstructed distances in excess of 500 feet during beta testing. Of course, multiple groups and multiple channels are supported.

This is a view of the flash from the back. Here it has the optional umbrella holder and reflector mounted:



Power for the CL-180 is provided by an external 4500mAh lithium-ion power pack. The pack has two power outlets and a removable battery cartridge. In my testing, a fully charged pack provided over 800 full power pops. Full power recycle time is approximately 2-1/2 seconds. With the appropriate cables (Quantum compatible cables will work) Nikon and Canon flash units can also be powered by the battery pack as can Quantum flash units.

The preceding should not be taken as a review. It’s intended as a product announcement. That said, I will add that the test units functioned flawlessly throughout the long beta test period. I believe Cheetah will have the CL-180 and accessories available some time later in February.
Old 01-27-2013, 12:51 AM
  #5798  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
interesting. cost?
Old 01-27-2013, 12:54 AM
  #5799  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
asianspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Photography Forum.
Posts: 25,342
Received 1,097 Likes on 831 Posts
no cost yet, but from reading the thread it looks to be aimed at Quantam flashes that run about 600+ or so.
Old 01-27-2013, 12:56 AM
  #5800  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
600+ ?


Quick Reply: C&P Random Thread -



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.