Honda: Development and Technology News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2008 | 04:34 PM
  #721  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by Gilgamesh
Thanks dom.

How long is it supposed to last?

I think I remember hearing it had to be refilled every 2 years or so but don't hold me to that.

Honda's new 2.2L diesel gets around the urea injection and still meets US emissions.
Old 05-22-2008 | 04:49 PM
  #722  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by dom
I think I remember hearing it had to be refilled every 2 years or so but don't hold me to that.

Honda's new 2.2L diesel gets around the urea injection and still meets US emissions.

Without a DPF, or is that how they got around it?
Old 05-22-2008 | 04:52 PM
  #723  
Trackruner228's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
I am not a huge hybrid fan, but you got to give the customers what they want.
Old 05-22-2008 | 06:07 PM
  #724  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,391
Likes: 634
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by dom
I think Honda is banking on far more than 10-20% considering their goal of 500K.
...and I don't think they're gonna get it...
Old 05-22-2008 | 06:28 PM
  #725  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,201
Likes: 1,162
From: YVR
Originally Posted by Gilgamesh
Without a DPF, or is that how they got around it?
What a DPF ?
Old 05-22-2008 | 06:44 PM
  #726  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
Diesel Particulate Filter. Its how the American trucks are getting around the new emissions regulations. Filter traps particles, then every so often fuel gets dumped into the exhaust to burn those particles into less harmful ones. No need to put any urea or anything else in the car. But, if you run old diesel fuel, its a new filter as the old one will clog.
Old 05-22-2008 | 07:37 PM
  #727  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,201
Likes: 1,162
From: YVR
Honda is using some exotic metal catalytic converter to get around from using the urea tank for it's clean-burn diesel engines. Maybe this converter is using a similar concept as the DPF.
Old 05-22-2008 | 08:01 PM
  #728  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
there also needs to be acura hybrids just like lexus has a hybrid. i'm betting that infiniti will release a hybrid before acura does.
Old 05-22-2008 | 08:10 PM
  #729  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,201
Likes: 1,162
From: YVR
Lexus hybrids are to boost hp, not to promote fuel mileages.
Old 05-22-2008 | 08:27 PM
  #730  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,524
Likes: 848
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Mokos23
there also needs to be acura hybrids just like lexus has a hybrid. i'm betting that infiniti will release a hybrid before acura does.
For now I think they are going with diesel?
Old 05-22-2008 | 10:27 PM
  #731  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by iforyou
For now I think they are going with diesel?
yup, you're right about that, but i was just commenting on hybrids.
Old 05-23-2008 | 01:52 AM
  #732  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,391
Likes: 634
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by iforyou
For now I think they are going with diesel?
+1
Old 05-23-2008 | 07:17 AM
  #733  
TSX69's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 1,400
From: NC
Arrow G S

Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Lexus hybrids are to boost hp, not to promote fuel mileages.
That was the plan but I think that the relative failure of the GS450h is bc Lexus also offers the GS460 which has 2 more horsepower & 72 lbs of torque ... all starting at $2,280 less. So fuel economy is something more that the GS450h has to offer ... and only 5 more mpg in the city & 1 more on the highway.
GS 350
$44,150
19/27
303 @ 6200 RPM
274 @ 3600 RPM

GS 460
$52,620
17/24
342 @ 6200 RPM
339 @ 3600 RPM

GS 450h
$54,900
22/25
340 @ 6400 RPM
267 @ 4800 RPM
Maybe if they tuned the 450h down a bit to get less power & more mpg, it would sell more ... ?
Old 05-23-2008 | 12:10 PM
  #734  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by biker
...and I don't think they're gonna get it...

You sure?

http://www.leftlanenews.com/toyota-m...-in-japan.html

Toyota, the world's biggest automaker, is planning to build two manufacturing plants in a partnership with consumer electronics giant Matsushita. The plants will build batteries for hybrid vehicles and other environmentally-friendly cars, upping total production to 1 million annually by 2011. The plants will be built by Panasonic EV Energy Co., a joint venture of the two companies and, along with an upgrade in an existing facility, are reported to cost 70 billion yen (about $685 million).

The plan calls for a new nickel-metal hydride plant costing close to 30 billion yen built in Taiwa, Miyagi Prefecture, that would start operations in 2011, as per Automotive News. The output would be 300,000 batteries per year. A 10 billion yen plant that would build lithium-ion batteries would be added to an existing facility in Kosai, Shizuoka, along with the remaining 30 million used for boosting output of nickel-metal hydride batteries at the same facility. The measures would double last year's Panasonic EV battery production of 500,000 units.

Unlike other manufacturers, which seem to be backing the lithium-ion battery technology, Toyota is hedging its bets, sticking to its proven nickel tech, as used in the current Prius. The next-gen Prius will also likely use the older-style batteries, while its Lexus counterpart is expected to switch to lithium-ion cells.
Old 05-23-2008 | 01:29 PM
  #735  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,391
Likes: 634
From: Alexandria, VA
???^ that article is about Toyota - I'm talking about Honda.
Old 05-23-2008 | 02:06 PM
  #736  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
If Toyota plans to hit 1 mill I think its a safe bet for Honda to hit 500K.

Bottom line, IMO this Hybrid stragedy is the best news I've heard from Honda is quite some time.
Old 05-24-2008 | 02:24 AM
  #737  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,391
Likes: 634
From: Alexandria, VA
The problem I see for Honda is that some of their past strategy might no longer work. In many markets Honda waits till some trend is established and then Honda comes along with an even better product for that market. The problem is that customer's tastes and technology make such a "catch up" strategy a bit iffy these days. If diesels take off and the hybrid fad wanes Honda could be holding the bag with a car that is not so hot anymore. That could definitely happen if we're talking 2015.
Old 05-27-2008 | 12:44 PM
  #738  
TSX69's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 1,400
From: NC
Arrow Article

Honda Reworks Acura into Fuel-Efficient Diesel

By LAWRENCE ULRICH
New York Times

Consumers will have the option of choosing a diesel version of the 2009 Acura TSX.


Honda has spent decades establishing a reputation for fuel efficiency. But nothing in its current lineup, including its Civic Hybrid, can match the mileage of the diesel Accord I recently tested in and around New York City.

Minus its diesel powertrain, the European-market 2007 Accord that I drove is nearly identical to the car that Honda had been selling in the United States as the Acura TSX (in other words, it's smaller than the American Accord). The test car should give a solid indication of the mileage and performance American consumers can expect when Honda offers a diesel option for the redesigned 2009 TSX.

The Accord — a demonstration car provided by Robert Bosch, the German technology company, to highlight its fuel injectors and other diesel components — returned a remarkable 53 miles a gallon on the highway, 34 in the city and 44 in combined driving. Those miles included a bumper-to-bumper crawl through Manhattan, the worst possible conditions for fuel efficiency.

Cleaner emissions system

The model I drove was powered by a 4-cylinder diesel displacing 2.2 liters and producing 140 horsepower and a stout 250 pound-feet of torque — the force that drivers feel pushing them into their seats under acceleration. That huge torque relative to the engine's size is a main advantage of modern turbodiesels, making them well-suited to small economy cars and to burly SUV's that need torque for towing and hauling.

The America-bound Acura will use a new version of the 2.2-liter engine that I tested. The engine is notable for meeting 50-state emissions standards with no need to carry an onboard tank of urea, an ammonia-generating solution that other diesels use to scrub smoggy nitrogen oxides from the exhaust. Honda's patented pollution system generates its own ammonia to fulfill the same mission. While that cleaner emissions system wasn't installed on the Honda I tested, engineers expect it to have no discernible effect on fuel economy.

Advantages over hybrids

As with other diesels I've driven recently, the Honda's frugal highway mileage and versatile power are important advantages over the typical hybrid. The Accord covered the zero-to-60 run in just under 9 seconds in my testing, which doesn't sound spectacular on paper. But its passing power from 30, 50 or even 70 miles an hour was terrific, as the Honda easily shot past slower cars.

And as more hybrid owners are discovering, their cars deliver little or no mileage gain on the highway. That's because battery packs and electric motors add several hundred pounds, and the system also contributes negligible energy at freeway speeds.

Also unlike hybrids, which require drivers to go easy on the gas pedal, watch the speed limit and coast when possible to improve the mileage, the diesel Honda delivered brilliant economy with no special effort. Even spirited driving didn't dent the mileage much. The Accord delivered 50 mpg even during a 75-mph cruise and 40 mpg when I flogged it.

The Acura's only diesel telltale is an idle that's slightly louder than a gasoline car's, though it's not at all obtrusive. There was no trace of diesel smell or black exhaust.



Old 05-27-2008 | 12:48 PM
  #739  
Trackruner228's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Sounds like a good car, its just Diesel is now pushing $5.
Old 05-27-2008 | 12:52 PM
  #740  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
53 mpg hwy
Old 05-27-2008 | 01:10 PM
  #741  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,524
Likes: 848
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Trackruner228
Sounds like a good car, its just Diesel is now pushing $5.
Yea, but don't worry too much, as diesel is much more efficient than gasoline. The TSX at max gets you 35mpg on the hwy, that's not even close to the 53mpg you can get from the diesel. That's 50% difference, if gas is at $4, and diesel is at or below $6, then it will be worth it to have diesel.
Old 05-27-2008 | 01:16 PM
  #742  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
Diesel ftw. Can't wait to test drive this thing.
Old 05-27-2008 | 01:52 PM
  #743  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,383
Likes: 3,063
From: Appleton WI
Sweet
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:12 PM
  #744  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
If only the new Acuras weren't so damn ugly.

I'd love a TSX i-DTEC.
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:19 PM
  #745  
TSX69's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 1,400
From: NC
Wink Appearance

Originally Posted by charliemike
If only the new Acuras weren't so damn ugly.

I'd love a TSX i-DTEC.
Honda has made a habti of making some visual differences for their hybrids ... perhaps they will do the same for the diesels. Perhaps a new grill? LEDs?
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:29 PM
  #746  
Trackruner228's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Originally Posted by iforyou
Yea, but don't worry too much, as diesel is much more efficient than gasoline. The TSX at max gets you 35mpg on the hwy, that's not even close to the 53mpg you can get from the diesel. That's 50% difference, if gas is at $4, and diesel is at or below $6, then it will be worth it to have diesel.
Thats a very good point, but the question is can Acura make that clear to the general public?
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:38 PM
  #747  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Trackruner228
Thats a very good point, but the question is can Acura make that clear to the general public?
Don't forget that if the diesel engine is more expensive than the gas version you have to figure that in too
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:39 PM
  #748  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by charliemike
Don't forget that if the diesel engine is more expensive than the gas version you have to figure that in too
If? It pretty much a given that it will be.
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:40 PM
  #749  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
At least 2k IMO.
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:43 PM
  #750  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
If? It pretty much a given that it will be.
I didn't want to assume
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:44 PM
  #751  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
If Honda diesel mpg turns out like VW diesel mpg...........

VW Jetta TDI falls short of anticipated mileage

The U.S. EPA has released official fuel economy numbers for the Volkswagen Jetta TDI, which is a new entrant to the U.S. market for 2009. The car manages some very respectable numbers, but falls significantly short of Volkswagen's predictions for mileage.

Earlier this year, Volkswagen said the TDI Jetta would deliver highway economy in the 50s and city milage in 40s. Some reports out of VW even indicated the car might be able to hit 60 mpg on the highway. But according to the new data released by the EPA, the TDI delivers 30 mpg in the city and 40 mpg on the highway.

The high cost of diesel fuel doesn't help the Jetta TDI's case either. With gas at $3.79 per gallon and diesel at $4.50, the latter is 19 percent more expensive. That means penny-for-penny, the TDI is equivalent to a gas car that delivers 33.6 mpg on the highway and 25.2 mpg in the city.

It's possible the EPA has changed its testing methods even more drastically than expected, or perhaps VW will demand a recount, so we'll keep you posted as this story develops.
leftlanenews

Diesel is gonna be a hard sell at +$5 /gal combined with those mpg #'s.
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:45 PM
  #752  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by dom
At least 2k IMO.
If that's the case, then I think 15k miles a year is going to be the break-even mark for buying a diesel right now ... Less than 15k a year it will take longer than the average American owns a car to break even ... More than 15k and I think you come out ahead.

Or just keep the car for more than 42 months
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:46 PM
  #753  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by charliemike
If that's the case, then I think 15k miles a year is going to be the break-even mark for buying a diesel right now ... Less than 15k a year it will take longer than the average American owns a car to break even ... More than 15k and I think you come out ahead.

Or just keep the car for more than 42 months
Even worse if the mpg numbers end up like VW.

Diesel may not be the "magic bullet".
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:52 PM
  #754  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
<--- Not sold on diesel just yet.

No one seems to mention that while diesels are improved, they're still louder than an equivalent gas engine, not as smooth and generally don't perform as well. Its not all perfect on the diesel front.
Old 05-27-2008 | 03:08 PM
  #755  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Diesel is fine with me, I think it's more of a powerplant option than a "magic bullet" for fuel savings at the pump.

The only way for this to work is for Honda to deliver north of 50 mpg.
The rise in diesel fuel cost combined with the additional cost for the diesel engine will make this car like a hybrid: Hard to justify the cost.
Old 05-27-2008 | 05:16 PM
  #756  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,524
Likes: 848
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I'd imagine one of the primary reasons why diesel is more expensive here is because it's not very popular yet. I think if more cars use diesel, then oil and gas companies can produce more diesel, so that the difference between diesel and gasoline would be much less.

Didn't that article show the Euro Accord DOES get 53mpg on the hwy, and 44mpg combined in the real world? If that's the case, that's much better than what the TDI managed (35mpg combined).

There aren't that many passenger cars with diesel engines thus far in North America. Even though as of now, most diesel engines are not as smooth or as quiet as gasoline engines, but the difference is already very small, European car makers are especially good at this. I think one would complain about the sound quality rather than the quietness/harshness of a diesel engine. As in, a BMW 535d might not sound as exciting as a 535i in engine note.

I think it's good that Honda is working on many power plant choices: gasoline, diesel, fuel cell, and hybrid.
Old 05-27-2008 | 05:21 PM
  #757  
TypeSAddict's Avatar
is Pretty Much a Moron
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, NY
The EPA numbers are not representative of real world MPG for diesel models historically.


Check out fueleconomy.gov for better indications.

For example, the user-reported average for an 06 TDI Jetta on that site is 42 with individual reports as high as 54, while the EPA estimate in combined driving is 33.

Last edited by TypeSAddict; 05-27-2008 at 05:25 PM.
Old 05-27-2008 | 06:04 PM
  #758  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by iforyou
I'd imagine one of the primary reasons why diesel is more expensive here is because it's not very popular yet. I think if more cars use diesel, then oil and gas companies can produce more diesel, so that the difference between diesel and gasoline would be much less.
Supposedly, and I read this article on CNN Business or whatever so it's probably slightly more accurate than if it was fabricated by a chimp on a computer, there are two main refining processes and one is done primarily in the US and the other in Europe. One leads to more diesel and the other more gas.

We've been buying Europe's surplus gas reserves for a while because they use far more diesel than gasoline. I guess they use more heating oil over there too which is why they use the cracking method (IIRC).

Anyway, our current refineries are not able to cope with more diesel demand. As more diesel cars go on the highway, diesel prices are going to get much worse unless new refineries are brought online or we buy more diesel from foreign markets. Don't count on biodiesel either. Unless you want to pay $11 for a gallon of milk because corn feed for dairy cows has gone up 1000%

The whole process is very complex and that makes it easier to obfuscate on the part of the oil companies.

ExxonMobil has a networked system that keeps an eye on the local retailer's prices so that if the retailer raises retail prices ExxonMobil will just raise the wholesale price by the same amount. And ExxonMobil is raising some land leases by 10% a year (source: Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews)

Add on to that rampant oil speculation and the world is getting fucked and there's not a whole lot we can do about it.

Rep Maxine "I'm batshit crazy" Waters wants to nationalize the gasoline business. They should look at the oligopoly in the fuel market and stop taking money from ExxonMobil and the other oil companies first and then maybe I'll start taking Congress seriously. This 40mpg CAFE thing isn't going to go anywhere when oil companies do everything they can to suppress alternative fuels. And true alternatives not the bullshit biodiesel/ethanol debacle that is sending corn prices (and everything that uses corn in some way) through the fucking roof.

There's so much hypocrisy at every level of this thing ... And when you hear that our "big" oil reserves only have about two years of proven oil in the ground ... I'm not really hopeful.
Old 05-27-2008 | 06:11 PM
  #759  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by charliemike
Rep Maxine "I'm batshit crazy" Waters wants to nationalize the gasoline business.
She's a true Marxist if I ever saw one.
Old 05-28-2008 | 03:59 AM
  #760  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,391
Likes: 634
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by dom
At least 2k IMO.
If MB can keep the diesel premium at 1K for the E-class I have to assume Honda can do the same or better.

The thing that came out of the hearings with the oil execs in Congress the other day is that they are making no money (and sometimes losing money) refining gas yet they profit 25 cent/gal refining diesel. That's one of the main reasons for such a wide spread between gas and diesel prices. All things being equal it probably costs about the same to refine a gal of premium and a gal of diesel.

As was pointed out the issue will be refining capacity for diesel - if the US changes to anything approaching EU car buying habits, diesel will go through the roof from demand.


Quick Reply: Honda: Development and Technology News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.