Acura: TLX News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2014, 01:22 PM
  #9561  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by Acura_Dude
"20 year-old dinosaur J-series" The J-series motor isn't that old and imo I think it's a decent motor.
It is a great engine but it's also old and can be found in a Honda Accord. People want more.
Old 07-04-2014, 01:42 PM
  #9562  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
With those prices folks will be paying MSRP for a while.
Old 07-04-2014, 03:14 PM
  #9563  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by MTEAZY
It is a great engine but it's also old and can be found in a Honda Accord. People want more.
Actually, only enthusiasts want more. The unwashed masses want a reliable engine to get them from a to b and cod care less that it's a J, K, L, M, N, O engine. Honestly, I'm impressed that Honda continues to get a lot out of the J series. It IS quite reliable, too. It's a noobie, even so, compared to the Chevy small block V8, which has existed in some form since Ed Cole designed it in 1954. The LS series variant has been in use for 23 years, with 5 gens, and I don't see Corvette owners (or CTS owners for that matter) complaining about it.
Old 07-04-2014, 03:23 PM
  #9564  
VR1
Itz JDM y0!
 
VR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 27
Posts: 2,136
Received 443 Likes on 290 Posts
Any figures on weight? Hoping for 3300 lbs for the K series.
Old 07-04-2014, 03:59 PM
  #9565  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Actually, only enthusiasts want more. The unwashed masses want a reliable engine to get them from a to b and cod care less that it's a J, K, L, M, N, O engine. Honestly, I'm impressed that Honda continues to get a lot out of the J series. It IS quite reliable, too. It's a noobie, even so, compared to the Chevy small block V8, which has existed in some form since Ed Cole designed it in 1954. The LS series variant has been in use for 23 years, with 5 gens, and I don't see Corvette owners (or CTS owners for that matter) complaining about it.
At the very least they could bring some more power out of it in this day and age. The 2G Type S had 60 hp more than Accord. TLX has 12. I know their engineers are capable but the bean counters won't allow it.
Old 07-04-2014, 04:09 PM
  #9566  
I spend 2 much time here
 
jiggaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,115
Received 103 Likes on 67 Posts
very attractive pricing indeed.
Old 07-04-2014, 05:22 PM
  #9567  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Actually, only enthusiasts want more. The unwashed masses want a reliable engine to get them from a to b and cod care less that it's a J, K, L, M, N, O engine. Honestly, I'm impressed that Honda continues to get a lot out of the J series. It IS quite reliable, too. It's a noobie, even so, compared to the Chevy small block V8, which has existed in some form since Ed Cole designed it in 1954. The LS series variant has been in use for 23 years, with 5 gens, and I don't see Corvette owners (or CTS owners for that matter) complaining about it.
Aside from adding DI acura hasn't done jack with the j since 07 when it changed its bell housing. It didn't get any hp increase for the TLX, it actually got a reduction. I see nothing to be impressed with with that. What is it they have gotten out of it you have seen to be impressed with? Other than reliability that motor needs to go and something newer, better, and more capable needs to come out.
Old 07-04-2014, 05:25 PM
  #9568  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by MTEAZY
At the very least they could bring some more power out of it in this day and age. The 2G Type S had 60 hp more than Accord. TLX has 12. I know their engineers are capable but the bean counters won't allow it.
Can see where you are coming from, but that's pretty much the only year where the TL had way more power than the Accord (2002). The next closest would be 2007/2008 with the TL-S making 286hp while the Accord was at 244hp.

Then again, both of the examples above are Type S trims. One could only hope Acura would bring back the Type S for the TLX in the near future.

On the other hand, while this time around, the TLX only has 12hp more, it also has 3 extra gear ratios to work with.
Old 07-04-2014, 05:38 PM
  #9569  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Aside from adding DI acura hasn't done jack with the j since 07 when it changed its bell housing. It didn't get any hp increase for the TLX, it actually got a reduction. I see nothing to be impressed with with that. What is it they have gotten out of it you have seen to be impressed with? Other than reliability that motor needs to go and something newer, better, and more capable needs to come out.
I think reliability is exactly what neuronbob was focusing on. He is looking at this from an non-enthusiast point of view.

I'd imagine other than reliable, he's also impressed by the NVH, fuel economy, and power delivery of the J and how it is still competitive in many areas.
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (07-04-2014)
Old 07-04-2014, 05:49 PM
  #9570  
Instructor
 
H_CAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 189
Received 80 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
I think reliability is exactly what neuronbob was focusing on. He is looking at this from an non-enthusiast point of view.

I'd imagine other than reliable, he's also impressed by the NVH, fuel economy, and power delivery of the J and how it is still competitive in many areas.
The J is competitive in all areas. There is only one area I can think of that isn't that competitive and that is in the output of the engine (and it's probably underrated), but it matches or exceeds its rivals in everything else.

One simply does not "just" add DI to an engine. It's a new engine that wears the same name, that is all.
Old 07-04-2014, 06:15 PM
  #9571  
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
 
cjTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 31
Posts: 4,899
Received 299 Likes on 207 Posts
Pricing is making me like the car. Was thinking $50+ loaded. Wow
Old 07-04-2014, 09:45 PM
  #9572  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
I think reliability is exactly what neuronbob was focusing on. He is looking at this from an non-enthusiast point of view.

I'd imagine other than reliable, he's also impressed by the NVH, fuel economy, and power delivery of the J and how it is still competitive in many areas.
Yup. We, the enthusiasts, pay attention to this stuff. My wife, who uses a car to get from a to b, would be happy if I bought her a Hyundai Accent and wouldn't care about power train, FWD vs AWD, etc. she only cares about how much the gas costs and whether there is room for neuronbob Jr. And his stuff.
Old 07-05-2014, 01:15 AM
  #9573  
Pro
 
Mugen.Justice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 36
Posts: 576
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Does the new 3.5 get a timing-chain?
Old 07-05-2014, 12:39 PM
  #9574  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
^^^^^

No. Still using timing belt just like all others in the J-series V6 family.
Old 07-05-2014, 06:37 PM
  #9575  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by H_CAR
The J is competitive in all areas. There is only one area I can think of that isn't that competitive and that is in the output of the engine (and it's probably underrated), but it matches or exceeds its rivals in everything else.

One simply does not "just" add DI to an engine. It's a new engine that wears the same name, that is all.
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Yup. We, the enthusiasts, pay attention to this stuff. My wife, who uses a car to get from a to b, would be happy if I bought her a Hyundai Accent and wouldn't care about power train, FWD vs AWD, etc. she only cares about how much the gas costs and whether there is room for neuronbob Jr. And his stuff.
For sure. Being competitive but that doesn't mean class leading. I think what some of us, such as fsttyms1, want to see is a class leading V6 engine that surpasses the Audi's 3.0T and BMW's 3.0 Turbo. I agree those are the ones to beat and that the J series is some way behind those in terms of output. Otherwise, the J is very competitive against other V6's in real world fuel economy, NVH, reliability, engine note, etc.
Old 07-06-2014, 11:23 AM
  #9576  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 18,167
Received 4,276 Likes on 2,641 Posts
Pretty good pricing.
If the reviews are good, they'll have no problems selling them.

Originally Posted by H_CAR

TLX 2.4L
8DCT
24/35/28
$30,995

TLX 2.4L with Technology Package
8DCT
24/35/28
$35,025

TLX 3.5L
9AT
21/34/26
$35,220

TLX 3.5L with Technolgy Package
9AT
21/34/26
$39,250

TLX 3.5L with Advance Package
9AT
21/34/26
$41,450

TLX 3.5 SH-AWD with Tecnolgy Package
9AT
21/31/25
$41,450

TLX 3.5 SH-AWD with Advanced Package
9AT
21/31/25
$44,700

Acura is not going to have any problems selling this car. Wow, unbelievable value.

http://www.honda.com/newsandviews/ar...linkId=8718219
Old 07-06-2014, 12:37 PM
  #9577  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
This

TLX 2.4L
8DCT
24/35/28
$30,995

is so going to cannibalize ILX sales.
Old 07-06-2014, 12:42 PM
  #9578  
Instructor
 
H_CAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 189
Received 80 Likes on 42 Posts
The ILX barely has any sales right now. Acura isn't concerned with that.
Old 07-06-2014, 12:56 PM
  #9579  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Originally Posted by H_CAR
The ILX barely has any sales right now. Acura isn't concerned with that.
Which is why they should be concerned.

They should also be concerned about sales of their flagship RLX.

They should also be concerned about their vapour car NSX.

Only a poorly run company would not be concerned about how their product and sales are doing.

But hey, maybe if they

Acura: TLX News-xcvlt8v.jpg

all those problems will go away.

Last edited by AZuser; 07-06-2014 at 01:03 PM.
The following 10 users liked this post by AZuser:
Costco (07-06-2014), Edward'TLS (07-06-2014), EL19 (07-07-2014), fsttyms1 (07-08-2014), Hapa DC5 (07-07-2014), JS + XES (07-07-2014), justnspace (07-06-2014), RPhilMan1 (07-07-2014), ttribe (07-06-2014), VR1 (07-06-2014) and 5 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 07-06-2014, 02:29 PM
  #9580  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Old 07-06-2014, 05:02 PM
  #9581  
Instructor
 
H_CAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 189
Received 80 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser
Which is why they should be concerned.

They should also be concerned about sales of their flagship RLX.

They should also be concerned about their vapour car NSX.

Only a poorly run company would not be concerned about how their product and sales are doing.

But hey, maybe if they



all those problems will go away.
I'm sure Acura is concerned with the sales of the ILX and RLX, but I also think they're not concerned with what the TLX will do to the ILX and RLX. They need a volume seller, and they made a smart decision pricing it where they did.

Last edited by H_CAR; 07-06-2014 at 05:11 PM.
Old 07-06-2014, 05:50 PM
  #9582  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by H_CAR
I'm sure Acura is concerned with the sales of the ILX and RLX, but I also think they're not concerned with what the TLX will do to the ILX and RLX. They need a volume seller, and they made a smart decision pricing it where they did.
This.

Think the other poster misunderstood your point.

Acura should NOT be concerned about the TLX killing the existing ILX in sales. The ILX isn't selling all that well anyway.

Acura SHOULD be concerned fixing the ILX.
Old 07-06-2014, 08:01 PM
  #9583  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser
Which is why they should be concerned.

They should also be concerned about sales of their flagship RLX.

They should also be concerned about their vapour car NSX.

Only a poorly run company would not be concerned about how their product and sales are doing.

But hey, maybe if they



all those problems will go away.
TLX is cheap because it's a mediocre product from a mediocre company. It just isn't a dismal failure like the RLX/ILX. And even if NSX is made, it's irrelevant, because almost none of the dedicated few who are still interested in this dead brand can comfortably afford one.
Old 07-06-2014, 08:50 PM
  #9584  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Acura should NOT be concerned about the TLX killing the existing ILX in sales. The ILX isn't selling all that well anyway.

Acura SHOULD be concerned fixing the ILX.
Seems like they're both one and the same to me.

Instead of competing against other car makes/manufacturers, Acura is just competing against itself.
Old 07-07-2014, 10:14 AM
  #9585  
5th Gear
 
darkmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow, pricing is great. Acura has likely eliminated any interest in a 2.4 ILX with this pricing structure. Oh well, the ILX was shit anyways.
Old 07-07-2014, 10:22 AM
  #9586  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Interestingly, Honda's been struggling in China with their upscale models because the Chinese all want German sedans. I think the same thing is going on in America.
Old 07-07-2014, 10:27 AM
  #9587  
Pro
 
EhkoXC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 38
Posts: 584
Received 65 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Aside from adding DI acura hasn't done jack with the j since 07 when it changed its bell housing. It didn't get any hp increase for the TLX, it actually got a reduction. I see nothing to be impressed with with that. What is it they have gotten out of it you have seen to be impressed with? Other than reliability that motor needs to go and something newer, better, and more capable needs to come out.
That's wrong, but I keep seeing it repeated. The 3.5L from the 4G TL output 280 HP while the 3.5L from the TLX outputs 290 HP. The 305 HP engine was the 3.7L V6.

The J Series is a perfectly fine engine, it hangs right with the other NA V6 engines around it's displacement. That being said, they need to get those turbo engines into production sooner rather than later.

I have to say, Acura got the pricing right with this. I expected the 2.4L base to be around $32km putting it just over $30k is a great move.
Old 07-07-2014, 12:14 PM
  #9588  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser
Seems like they're both one and the same to me.

Instead of competing against other car makes/manufacturers, Acura is just competing against itself.
haha let me try again....

The ILX is pretty much dead. Selling 500 units or 1000 units is still way below the original target of 30000 units per year. As such, Acura should NOT be concerned about the TLX furthering killing the ILX sales. The sales were already know, even if it gets worse, it doesn't matter much. Acura would be happy to selling 500 less ILX's per month, if they can sell 2000 more TLX's in the mean time.

With that said, Acura should be CONCERNED about the ILX long term future. Acura must recognize what went wrong with the ILX make a decision on what to do about it, if they haven't already started doing this already. There's definitely potential for a compact luxury sedan as shown by CLA and A3. Not having much hope, but the ILX needs a major MMC update, at the very least. Things like Jewel-Eye LED should be standard. The 2.0L engine needs much better EPA ratings as well as another 20-30hp as right now, the TLX 2.4 gets the same mileage as the ILX 2.0. Acura should consider putting the TLX's 2.4 engine along with 8-speed DCT into the ILX too. That powertrain combo in a sub-3000lb car should guarantee some decent performance. P-AWS needs to be standard on this 2.4 model too. The ILX should receive a facelift to make it more aggressive and premium looking. More features such as lane watch are also needed.
Old 07-07-2014, 01:24 PM
  #9589  
Racer
 
Boulder TSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 50
Posts: 459
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
Interestingly, Honda's been struggling in China with their upscale models because the Chinese all want German sedans. I think the same thing is going on in America.
Sorry, no. You're referencing a news article that said the Accord was not selling well in China, along with most larger Japanese cars. (Honda does not sell "upscale cars" in China, BTW.) There is a specific reason Japanese cars are not selling in China.

Japan and China have been nearly at a tipping point of war -- over the possession of the Senkakau islands.

From a recent BBC news story: "Ties between China and Japan have been strained by a territorial row over a group of islands, known as the Senkaku islands in Japan and the Diaoyu islands in China. They matter because they are close to important shipping lanes, offer rich fishing grounds and lie near potential oil and gas reserves."

The two countries virtually hate each other...hence a sentence like: "51 percent of Chinese consumers surveyed would never consider buying a Japanese car." Well, most Japanese consumers would neve buy a Chinese product -- if any kind.

The news stories reporting this have also said it is not Honda's problem alone...it is Japan's and China's

Last edited by Boulder TSX; 07-07-2014 at 01:27 PM.
Old 07-07-2014, 01:30 PM
  #9590  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Originally Posted by EhkoXC
I have to say, Acura got the pricing right with this. I expected the 2.4L base to be around $32km putting it just over $30k is a great move.
I'll be interested to see what the TLX does against the other cars in that price range. I'm legitmately curious if it's more a Fusion Titanium or an Audi/Lexus/BMW competitor.

What Acura thinks and markets the car as may be different from how everyone actually views it.
Old 07-07-2014, 01:59 PM
  #9591  
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
 
cjTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 31
Posts: 4,899
Received 299 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
I'll be interested to see what the TLX does against the other cars in that price range. I'm legitmately curious if it's more a Fusion Titanium or an Audi/Lexus/BMW competitor.

What Acura thinks and markets the car as may be different from how everyone actually views it.
Naysayers may call the TLX a tarted up Accord but I don't think that's what it is at all. I think regardless of the POS cars Acura has put on the road lately, the brand still is associated with premium and luxury. Ford, is not. A $35K Titanium is perceived the same to most people as the $22K base one.
Old 07-07-2014, 02:07 PM
  #9592  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
I'll be interested to see what the TLX does against the other cars in that price range. I'm legitmately curious if it's more a Fusion Titanium or an Audi/Lexus/BMW competitor.

What Acura thinks and markets the car as may be different from how everyone actually views it.
Fusion has a better powertrain than the $30k TLX. Honda dropped the ball on the final thing I thought they could do well- building engines.
Old 07-07-2014, 02:55 PM
  #9593  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
Interestingly, Honda's been struggling in China with their upscale models because the Chinese all want German sedans. I think the same thing is going on in America.
China's an unfair market to look at though because there is much historical animosity between China and Japan. A recent survey taken of Chinese buyers indicated that some 51% would not even consider a Japanese brand. With that kind of disadvantage, there is no way Honda, Acura, Toyota, or Lexus can seriously eek out more than mere morsels in that market.

Edit: I see someone else beat me to the punch on pointing this out...

Last edited by CGTSX2004; 07-07-2014 at 02:57 PM.
Old 07-07-2014, 03:29 PM
  #9594  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Edit: I see someone else beat me to the punch on pointing this out...
Okay. Point taken
Old 07-07-2014, 04:26 PM
  #9595  
Instructor
 
H_CAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 189
Received 80 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by MTEAZY
Fusion has a better powertrain than the $30k TLX. Honda dropped the ball on the final thing I thought they could do well- building engines.
How so?

I think the 4 cylinder TLX will be faster than the Fusion 2.0 Ecoboost. Don't even get me started on the V6...
Old 07-07-2014, 04:56 PM
  #9596  
David_Dude
 
Acura_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Age: 35
Posts: 13,283
Received 581 Likes on 515 Posts
Originally Posted by MTEAZY
TLX is cheap because it's a mediocre product from a mediocre company. It just isn't a dismal failure like the RLX/ILX. And even if NSX is made, it's irrelevant, because almost none of the dedicated few who are still interested in this dead brand can comfortably afford one.
Tell us how you really feel.

Originally Posted by cjTL
Naysayers may call the TLX a tarted up Accord but I don't think that's what it is at all. I think regardless of the POS cars Acura has put on the road lately, the brand still is associated with premium and luxury. Ford, is not. A $35K Titanium is perceived the same to most people as the $22K base one.
Old 07-07-2014, 04:58 PM
  #9597  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
glad they did not go with the original $50k fully loaded MSRP.

Now Acura has a very good chance to sell TLX 3xxx or even 4xxx a month.

They can afford to do something "Advance" with the ILX cuz you can do worse than the current ILX.
put a K24T in there and maintain the same $30k MSRP.
Old 07-07-2014, 05:09 PM
  #9598  
David_Dude
 
Acura_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Age: 35
Posts: 13,283
Received 581 Likes on 515 Posts
^
Old 07-07-2014, 05:22 PM
  #9599  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by H_CAR
How so?

I think the 4 cylinder TLX will be faster than the Fusion 2.0 Ecoboost. Don't even get me started on the V6...
I think he's being sarcastic...?
Old 07-07-2014, 05:26 PM
  #9600  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Pricing is pretty good. I'm pleasantly surprised. That grill still sucks.


Quick Reply: Acura: TLX News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.