Acura: Integra News
#321
Ex-OEM King
Just because the Si was the fastest Civic in the country doesn't mean the the base Integra is always going to be benchmarked against the fastest Civic in the country. If it were, then you'd also expect a substantial price increase since the fastest Civic is now $10K more than an Si. As it is, the Integra is about $3K more than the Si. Want it to have the 2.0T? You're probably looking at mid-to-high 30s. At that price level I suspect a good amount of their young prospective buyers are going to be priced out.
Civic Si: ~200hp 1.5T 6MT for ~$28k
Golf GTI: ~240hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$29k
Veloster N: ~275hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$32k
WRX: ~270hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$30k
The competitors all have a lot more power and more engine for not a lot more money (based on MSRP that is). These days power is cheap and reliable with turbo motors which is why it surprises me that Honda doesn't do it on any of their cars.
The following users liked this post:
RPhilMan1 (11-17-2021)
#322
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,195
Received 2,776 Likes
on
1,979 Posts
Guys I found the best part of the Integra!
The following users liked this post:
Yumcha (11-12-2021)
#323
Team Owner
The pricing is all kinds of crazy though if you look at competitive cars.
Civic Si: ~200hp 1.5T 6MT for ~$28k
Golf GTI: ~240hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$29k
Veloster N: ~275hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$32k
WRX: ~270hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$30k
The competitors all have a lot more power and more engine for not a lot more money (based on MSRP that is). These days power is cheap and reliable with turbo motors which is why it surprises me that Honda doesn't do it on any of their cars.
Civic Si: ~200hp 1.5T 6MT for ~$28k
Golf GTI: ~240hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$29k
Veloster N: ~275hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$32k
WRX: ~270hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$30k
The competitors all have a lot more power and more engine for not a lot more money (based on MSRP that is). These days power is cheap and reliable with turbo motors which is why it surprises me that Honda doesn't do it on any of their cars.
#324
The pricing is all kinds of crazy though if you look at competitive cars.
Civic Si: ~200hp 1.5T 6MT for ~$28k
Golf GTI: ~240hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$29k
Veloster N: ~275hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$32k
WRX: ~270hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$30k
The competitors all have a lot more power and more engine for not a lot more money (based on MSRP that is). These days power is cheap and reliable with turbo motors which is why it surprises me that Honda doesn't do it on any of their cars.
Civic Si: ~200hp 1.5T 6MT for ~$28k
Golf GTI: ~240hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$29k
Veloster N: ~275hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$32k
WRX: ~270hp 2.0T 6MT for ~$30k
The competitors all have a lot more power and more engine for not a lot more money (based on MSRP that is). These days power is cheap and reliable with turbo motors which is why it surprises me that Honda doesn't do it on any of their cars.
#325
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
#326
AZ Community Team
I'm curious if a CTR hardware will make it onto the Integra.
#327
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
#328
AZ Community Team
#329
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
I was being somewhat sarcastic in my response.
But I'm not expecting a massive difference. Maybe 10-15hp more than the Civic, more weight, slower overall.
But I'm not expecting a massive difference. Maybe 10-15hp more than the Civic, more weight, slower overall.
#330
The following 2 users liked this post by AZuser:
civicdrivr (11-13-2021),
RPhilMan1 (11-17-2021)
#331
RDX now starts at $40K. so they need something at $30K. but i am surprize Acura is not creating some thing based on new HRV. to start at $30K. this thing with Acura badge will have long wait times. i
visibility,space and design. seats have high position. alot more space for legs.
visibility,space and design. seats have high position. alot more space for legs.
#332
6G TLX-S
.
#333
6G TLX-S
#334
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
^ I don't see the resemblance there.
It's way more TLX, Crosstour, Genesis than DC2.
It's way more TLX, Crosstour, Genesis than DC2.
The following users liked this post:
RPhilMan1 (11-17-2021)
#335
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
#336
Moderator
https://www.netcarshow.com/acura/2021-integra_concept/
Acura gave the world its first look at the highly-anticipated new Integra, signaling the return of the celebrated nameplate to the Acura lineup. Finished in striking Indy Yellow Pearl paint borrowed from NSX, the Integra Prototype is a strong indication of the exterior design of the all-new 2023 Acura Integra, which will be priced around $30,000 when it arrives at Acura dealers in 2022.
Inspired by past Integras, including the original that helped launch the Acura brand in 1986, the 2023 Integra will become the new gateway performance model in the Acura lineup, a premium sport compact with an evocative five-door design and fun-to-drive spirit. The first-ever factory-turbocharged Integra will excite a new generation of enthusiast drivers with an available six-speed manual transmission, limited slip differential and high-output 1.5-liter engine, with VTEC® of course.
"The Integra is one of the most iconic models in Acura's history," said Jon Ikeda, Vice President and Acura Brand Officer. "This new Integra, will continue to deliver on the original's unique aspirational yet attainable market position, with emotional performance and style, combined with the versatility and utility sought after by today's buyers."
Designed in Japan, the new Acura Integra's bold exterior styling features a dramatically sloping roofline and liftback tailgate, giving it a distinct coupe-like road presence. A modern interpretation of the Integra line, the fifth-generation model displays trademark cues such as the embossed Integra name under the driver's side headlight and passenger's side taillight.
First seen on the Type S Concept, Acura's new frameless Diamond Pentagon grille gives the Integra front a purposeful and sporty character. Acura's unique lighting signature is updated with the "Chicane" LED daytime running lights now positioned above the Integra's JewelEye® LED headlights, yielding an even more dramatic appearance.
Muscular rear wheel arches and aggressive rear fascia with dual-exhaust finishers emphasize Integra's wide track. Inspired by previous Integra models, the distinctive rear styling features wide, single-piece taillights with matching "Chicane" light signature. Behind the Integra Prototype's matte-finish 19-inch split-five spoke wheels are oversized Brembo™ high-performance brakes with color-keyed Indy Yellow calipers, providing incredible stopping power and an aggressive look.
The Acura Integra Prototype's striking Indy Yellow Pearl paint pays homage to Phoenix Yellow, offered on the iconic 2000-2001 Integra Type R. High-gloss Berlina Black accents have been applied to the Integra's roof, decklid spoiler, mirror caps, rear diffuser and front grille. A lower-sill graphic boldly displays the Integra name across the side of the vehicle.
The launch of the 2023 Acura Integra will mark the first time for Integra to be built in America, when it begins mass production next year at the Marysville Auto Plant in Ohio. Set to be built on the same production line with the Acura TLX, Integra will join all new Acura models sold in the U.S. in being built in Ohio.
Inspired by past Integras, including the original that helped launch the Acura brand in 1986, the 2023 Integra will become the new gateway performance model in the Acura lineup, a premium sport compact with an evocative five-door design and fun-to-drive spirit. The first-ever factory-turbocharged Integra will excite a new generation of enthusiast drivers with an available six-speed manual transmission, limited slip differential and high-output 1.5-liter engine, with VTEC® of course.
"The Integra is one of the most iconic models in Acura's history," said Jon Ikeda, Vice President and Acura Brand Officer. "This new Integra, will continue to deliver on the original's unique aspirational yet attainable market position, with emotional performance and style, combined with the versatility and utility sought after by today's buyers."
Designed in Japan, the new Acura Integra's bold exterior styling features a dramatically sloping roofline and liftback tailgate, giving it a distinct coupe-like road presence. A modern interpretation of the Integra line, the fifth-generation model displays trademark cues such as the embossed Integra name under the driver's side headlight and passenger's side taillight.
First seen on the Type S Concept, Acura's new frameless Diamond Pentagon grille gives the Integra front a purposeful and sporty character. Acura's unique lighting signature is updated with the "Chicane" LED daytime running lights now positioned above the Integra's JewelEye® LED headlights, yielding an even more dramatic appearance.
Muscular rear wheel arches and aggressive rear fascia with dual-exhaust finishers emphasize Integra's wide track. Inspired by previous Integra models, the distinctive rear styling features wide, single-piece taillights with matching "Chicane" light signature. Behind the Integra Prototype's matte-finish 19-inch split-five spoke wheels are oversized Brembo™ high-performance brakes with color-keyed Indy Yellow calipers, providing incredible stopping power and an aggressive look.
The Acura Integra Prototype's striking Indy Yellow Pearl paint pays homage to Phoenix Yellow, offered on the iconic 2000-2001 Integra Type R. High-gloss Berlina Black accents have been applied to the Integra's roof, decklid spoiler, mirror caps, rear diffuser and front grille. A lower-sill graphic boldly displays the Integra name across the side of the vehicle.
The launch of the 2023 Acura Integra will mark the first time for Integra to be built in America, when it begins mass production next year at the Marysville Auto Plant in Ohio. Set to be built on the same production line with the Acura TLX, Integra will join all new Acura models sold in the U.S. in being built in Ohio.
#337
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,195
Received 2,776 Likes
on
1,979 Posts
The following 5 users liked this post by Mizouse:
04WDPSeDaN (11-18-2021),
1Louder (11-17-2021),
AZuser (11-19-2021),
Costco (11-19-2021),
pttl (11-17-2021)
#338
My first Avatar....
The side profile of that car is seriously ugly.
Honda designers.
Honda designers.
#339
Ex-OEM King
I think the side would look a lot better if it wasn't fucking yellow with a sticker on it. This car in gray, white, blue, red, etc would suit it much better than yellow lol.
The following users liked this post:
DJ Iceman (11-19-2021)
#340
Senior Moderator
I was excited for this car when it was announced and it was finally revealed a couple days back...I tried to hold off my initial response...
But, yeah...now, days later, I still don't like it. WTF, Honda.
But, yeah...now, days later, I still don't like it. WTF, Honda.
#341
#342
Senior Moderator
#343
Ex-OEM King
I still seriously think Honda should just shit can Acura and move on. Make all the Acura models a trim level of whatever Honda they're based on and call it good. Wouldn't be a whole lot of difference in reality either.
#344
True. Plus I'm sure the sticker accounts for the majority of whatever power increase this has over the normal Civic.
I still seriously think Honda should just shit can Acura and move on. Make all the Acura models a trim level of whatever Honda they're based on and call it good. Wouldn't be a whole lot of difference in reality either.
I still seriously think Honda should just shit can Acura and move on. Make all the Acura models a trim level of whatever Honda they're based on and call it good. Wouldn't be a whole lot of difference in reality either.
I think Acura is desperately trying to figure out how to differentiate itself from Honda beyond just being a Honda Plus product since they decided to hop off the luxury boat about ten years ago. The problem is that Acura's definition of "Performance" is doesn't match what most people think of when they think of "Performance". Sure their base cars might be more dynamic and "fun to drive" compared to the competitors' base cars, and maybe the Type S "performance" models might be more "fun to drive" compared to the equivalent competitive models (which aren't even their performance models), but all that doesn't show up in the numbers. When I think of Acura's "performance", I think of cars like the Miata and GT86/BRZ. Yes, they're fun to drive, and yes, they are drivers cars, but performance? Sporty, yes, but performance, no not really.
I forget which outlet said it, but "Precision Crafted Adequecy" probably best describes the company.
Last edited by fiatlux; 11-17-2021 at 11:05 AM.
#345
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
I half expected Acura marketing to spout some BS about how this is a callback to the DOHC VTEC sticker from the 8G Si.
I think Acura is desperately trying to figure out how to differentiate itself from Honda beyond just being a Honda Plus product since they decided to hop off the luxury boat about ten years ago. The problem is that Acura's definition of "Performance" is doesn't match what most people think of when they think of "Performance". Sure their base cars might be more dynamic and "fun to drive" compared to the competitors' base cars, and maybe the Type S "performance" models might be more "fun to drive" compared to the equivalent competitive models (which aren't even their performance models), but all that doesn't show up in the numbers. When I think of Acura's "performance", I think of cars like the Miata and GT86/BRZ. Yes, they're fun to drive, and yes, they are drivers cars, but performance? Sporty, yes, but performance, no not really.
I forget which outlet said it, but "Precision Crafted Adequecy" probably best describes the company.
I think Acura is desperately trying to figure out how to differentiate itself from Honda beyond just being a Honda Plus product since they decided to hop off the luxury boat about ten years ago. The problem is that Acura's definition of "Performance" is doesn't match what most people think of when they think of "Performance". Sure their base cars might be more dynamic and "fun to drive" compared to the competitors' base cars, and maybe the Type S "performance" models might be more "fun to drive" compared to the equivalent competitive models (which aren't even their performance models), but all that doesn't show up in the numbers. When I think of Acura's "performance", I think of cars like the Miata and GT86/BRZ. Yes, they're fun to drive, and yes, they are drivers cars, but performance? Sporty, yes, but performance, no not really.
I forget which outlet said it, but "Precision Crafted Adequecy" probably best describes the company.
#346
My first Avatar....
^
Give me a Mazda 3 turbo over this integra contraption any day of the week.
Give me a Mazda 3 turbo over this integra contraption any day of the week.
The following 3 users liked this post by pttl:
#347
Senior Moderator
What a huge letdown.
#348
Ex-OEM King
I half expected Acura marketing to spout some BS about how this is a callback to the DOHC VTEC sticker from the 8G Si.
I think Acura is desperately trying to figure out how to differentiate itself from Honda beyond just being a Honda Plus product since they decided to hop off the luxury boat about ten years ago. The problem is that Acura's definition of "Performance" is doesn't match what most people think of when they think of "Performance". Sure their base cars might be more dynamic and "fun to drive" compared to the competitors' base cars, and maybe the Type S "performance" models might be more "fun to drive" compared to the equivalent competitive models (which aren't even their performance models), but all that doesn't show up in the numbers. When I think of Acura's "performance", I think of cars like the Miata and GT86/BRZ. Yes, they're fun to drive, and yes, they are drivers cars, but performance? Sporty, yes, but performance, no not really.
I forget which outlet said it, but "Precision Crafted Adequecy" probably best describes the company.
I think Acura is desperately trying to figure out how to differentiate itself from Honda beyond just being a Honda Plus product since they decided to hop off the luxury boat about ten years ago. The problem is that Acura's definition of "Performance" is doesn't match what most people think of when they think of "Performance". Sure their base cars might be more dynamic and "fun to drive" compared to the competitors' base cars, and maybe the Type S "performance" models might be more "fun to drive" compared to the equivalent competitive models (which aren't even their performance models), but all that doesn't show up in the numbers. When I think of Acura's "performance", I think of cars like the Miata and GT86/BRZ. Yes, they're fun to drive, and yes, they are drivers cars, but performance? Sporty, yes, but performance, no not really.
I forget which outlet said it, but "Precision Crafted Adequecy" probably best describes the company.
#349
It’s a shame their marketing dept didn’t choose slogan that their cars could actually support. “Precision Crafted, Sport Injected” is a lot more accurate. Their cars are pretty good if you look at them with the right perspective, but the unrealistic expectations that all this talk about “performance” sets leads to disappointment and ridicule. You can’t bill yourself as “performance” and then accelerate slower than almost everything else in the same class.
#350
Team Owner
#351
Team Owner
The following users liked this post:
pttl (11-17-2021)
#352
Senior Moderator
#353
Team Owner
#354
Ex-OEM King
It’s a shame their marketing dept didn’t choose slogan that their cars could actually support. “Precision Crafted, Sport Injected” is a lot more accurate. Their cars are pretty good if you look at them with the right perspective, but the unrealistic expectations that all this talk about “performance” sets leads to disappointment and ridicule. You can’t bill yourself as “performance” and then accelerate slower than almost everything else in the same class.
#355
Team Owner
It is still shocking that a 3L TWIN TURBO can be as bad as a TLX-S.... i did not expect it to be as fast as BMW... but i seriously thought it was be at least on par with S4, which i believe is what Acura used as the benchmark for TLX-S right?
How they could allow TLX-S to go in production when i am sure they had done the testing and comparison already???
How they could allow TLX-S to go in production when i am sure they had done the testing and comparison already???
#356
It is still shocking that a 3L TWIN TURBO can be as bad as a TLX-S.... i did not expect it to be as fast as BMW... but i seriously thought it was be at least on par with S4, which i believe is what Acura used as the benchmark for TLX-S right?
How they could allow TLX-S to go in production when i am sure they had done the testing and comparison already???
How they could allow TLX-S to go in production when i am sure they had done the testing and comparison already???
#357
Team Owner
#358
#359
Team Owner
Why?
Only non-car people would think TwinTurbo is better than single turbo. In reality it does not really matter.
It is just different applications. Single turbo can make just as much power as twin actually if it could make more. That is especially true in 2021 when mild hybrid and other tech like twinscroll turbo are making single turbo lag almost non-existent.
I personally see little to no benefits of having TT, all it does it having more hardware to breakdown and adding more weight.
Only non-car people would think TwinTurbo is better than single turbo. In reality it does not really matter.
It is just different applications. Single turbo can make just as much power as twin actually if it could make more. That is especially true in 2021 when mild hybrid and other tech like twinscroll turbo are making single turbo lag almost non-existent.
I personally see little to no benefits of having TT, all it does it having more hardware to breakdown and adding more weight.
Last edited by oonowindoo; 11-18-2021 at 12:45 PM.
#360
Ex-OEM King
A twin turbo setup is to reduce lag by making the impellers smaller as they need to pass less flow through each bank of the engine. A twin scroll accomplishes the same task by having two different impellers in the same housing. Other than sounding more fancy, a twin turbo setup is no better or worse than a twin scroll.