Intake Resonator Removed

Old Oct 3, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #1  
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
COTM Coordinator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 15
From: Apple Valley, Ca
Intake Resonator Removed

So I was removing my front bumper to get the grill off for the paint shop. While I was there I saw this little box (resonator) and thought I should remove it. I have done that to my previous TL and pretty much every car that I have had that has a resonator. Lets just say the resonator have gotten ridiculously hard to remove. I spent two hours trying to get this damn thing out and there is no way in hell its ever going back in.

I though for sure it would have been an easy process but nope. I had to remove the intake box, removed the battery thinking that I could remove the battery tray, then realized that the battery tray removal would take an additional hour by itself. So I strong armed the damn ducting out, removed the resonator, put everything back together and took it for a drive.

Im sure your next question is "was it worth it?" Well yes and no. The intake sounds great now, and its equivalent to the Takeda intake sound, but the time spent removing it and the frustration that set in half way through makes it not worth it.

Im glad its out and I get to enjoy the growl of the egine and it takes away the frustration from the removal.

So if you guys want to remove the resonator it will change the sound of the engine just be prepared for a retarded battle against some pretty stiff plastic
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 12:14 AM
  #2  
djtanveer's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 793
Likes: 98
From: San Jose,CA
any noticeable performance gain?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #3  
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
COTM Coordinator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 15
From: Apple Valley, Ca
Actually yes. As weird as it may sound, I had a two hour drive tonight and the thorttle response is a lot better. I know its not my imagination because my girlfriend noticed when I stepped on it to pass a car, it reacted a hell of a lot better than before. Im now more glad that I did it lol./
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 09:08 PM
  #4  
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
COTM Coordinator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 15
From: Apple Valley, Ca
This is where the resonator connects to the ducting. I reinstalled the resonator only because it holds the brake ducting and there is no way the duct would stay in pace without the resonator. The resonator does not block any air or have any adverse affect on the intake when the ducting is removed.




This is how it looks when you open your hood and you see the intake scoop sitting there. The ducting goes under the battery and try and loops out to the side in front of the wheel well then back up to the air box.


Looks a little restrictive to me
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 07:30 AM
  #5  
SaNdSuKkA's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Did you say you ended up re-installing the resonator?

My car is actually in the body shop to repair some front end damage. They called and told me that the resonator was cracked and they would have to replace it. I'm wondering now if I should just tell them to remove it :-P
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 08:49 AM
  #6  
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
COTM Coordinator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 15
From: Apple Valley, Ca
I removed the resonator ducting which completely removed any air going through the resonator to the intake system. The resonator is still there because it holds the brake ducting in place. If it werent for that I would have removed the resonator completely. I hope this makes sense.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #7  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
I did this awhile ago.

My thread shows the picture of part of the resonator bolted back in to hold the brake duct, but it's disconnected from the intake tubing.

https://acurazine.com/forums/4g-tl-performance-parts-modifications-295/cold-air-intake-diy-awd-728069/
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #8  
Mr Marco's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Likes: 609
Nice pics! Sounds like a huge pain in the ass to remove. If you go for the Takeda intake instead, do you leave all that ducting in place?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #9  
TLNV's Avatar
Thbbbbbbbbbbbt
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 305
Likes: 2
From: Nevada
Originally Posted by Mr Marco
Nice pics! Sounds like a huge pain in the ass to remove. If you go for the Takeda intake instead, do you leave all that ducting in place?
Short answer yes
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #10  
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
COTM Coordinator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 15
From: Apple Valley, Ca
Yeah but is it worth the 200 for the same affect??
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #11  
777mycoolangelo's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 424
Likes: 10
I thought i put up the post but guess not...

Is this the NEW MURKEDA? LOL!
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #12  
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
COTM Coordinator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 15
From: Apple Valley, Ca
Sure is. The Murkeda intake lol.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #13  
Mr Marco's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Likes: 609
Originally Posted by MurkyRiversTL
Yeah but is it worth the 200 for the same affect??
Is there a way to just remove/cut a portion of the intake, or do I need to remove the bumper to get to it. I'm not sold on the aftermarket intake because what I've read said hp seemed to go down. Looks like gutting the stock intake is the best way to go.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #14  
SaNdSuKkA's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Mr Marco
Is there a way to just remove/cut a portion of the intake, or do I need to remove the bumper to get to it. I'm not sold on the aftermarket intake because what I've read said hp seemed to go down. Looks like gutting the stock intake is the best way to go.
I'm curious, where did you read this? I've only read positive things about the Takeda intake. Why would HP go down on a less restrictive intake?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 09:52 PM
  #15  
Mr Marco's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Likes: 609
^^^^Here you go:
Originally Posted by dwest1023
Just installed my takeda and I must say the instructions could have been a bit better. It would have been nice if the instructions had said remove, "metal coolant line". I did not realize this until near the end of the install. Cold have saved 30min of time. I also recommend that you use a screwdriver to help "Push" the hoses off.

As been already said, the sound is nice. Adds a bit of excitement to the driving experience.
Hard for me to say if there is any HP improvement since I have very little seat time in my TL. It does appear my gas mileage has improved. I like the fact that normal driving the car is still very quit. I had some concerns there.
Originally Posted by 09MDX
Does anyone actually have any dyno's before and after??? I would really like to see one.
14 whp /14 ft torque,is the numbers Takeda has. Can anyone back this up?
Originally Posted by 037
my personal 0-60 tests show 0 gain with takeda intake and UR pulley installed same time. No dyno.
Originally Posted by petec2010
While I agree it seems like an "expensive mod" for the hp gain, there is a benefit by getting a spacer. I believe excelerate actually took a 3G to the dyno before and after, and it did show a minor (few HP) improvement. It's not a zero benefit, but there are things that can give you much more HP per $$
Originally Posted by 2010_TL
Has anyone actually dyno'd their car with this intake yet? I think this intake makes our cars run too rich and actually loses some power.

I have a buddy that has the same exact intake on his 09 Accord V6 Sedan and when we dyno'd his car, it ran too rich and he actually lost power. I'm thinking this might be an issue with our cars also because I'm assuming that we have the same MAF sensor. His MAF sensor was detecting too much air coming into the engine and didn't know what to do so it just started dumping fuel into the engine hoping to correct it which causes the car to run rich. Just a thought, I dont have anything to back this up with so I might be wrong.
Originally Posted by Excelerate


TAKEDA showed a 14 hp/tq gain. Each car is different so it might be somewhat less than that but you should expect 10 whp/wtq on average.
Originally Posted by ieh
I agree with you. I installed the Takeda intake to my AWD, to me and my friend, except the intake will makes louder noise when pass 4000 or 5000rpm, seriously we didn't feel any different to the stock box filter with a K&N air filter changed....also it actually feel slower at the 1 and 2 gears.....
I also brought the car to a race track again once after I installed the Takeda intake and there were absolutely no big different to a K&N air filter...
I may have to bring the car to my friend shop to have an ECU tune up to see can they get this right....
Originally Posted by YetiTL
Keep us informed of your results. I was wondering the same thing. The Takeda intake was great at first, even got a small MPG increase but after 10 months, my car now have the same MPG in D or S mode while driving in the city and my MPG decreased by about 1 MPG (D mode went from 18 down to 16 and S mode went from 16.5-17 dwon to 16).

Highway mileage stayed the same for some unknown reason.

I'm curious to know your experience as I was wondering if someone made controlled runs with the Takeda intake (not dyno but actual 1/4 mile or something similar) to see if there was some real, measurable gains.

I would really like to know if there's a way of tuning the ECU to return to what it was just after the install, that would be great.
Originally Posted by 2010_TL
Our cars might be different than the accords but when my buddy had the Takeda intake on his car, there wasnt any codes that came up or anything. But the dyno graphs proved that his car ran too rich.

We swamped his intake back to the stock airbox and after we let the ECU adjust for a day or so, it made a HUGE difference. His car got noticeably quicker than before.
Originally Posted by petec2010
Two questions on that dyno. Is it just me or do the HP stats seem disturbingly low? Was that AWD or FWD? In addition, doesn't the graph normally go diagonally up from L to R? Sorry, I don't really understand this dyno stuff.
Originally Posted by Recall
I had to uninstall the Takeda intake because the check engine light keeps coming on I think there were too much air coming in for the MAF to handle. I install the factory intake back, took it to the dealer to scan but they did not find a code.
The check engine light hasn't come on since the car even runs better.
Originally Posted by 037
Dyno plz!
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 07:22 AM
  #16  
SaNdSuKkA's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Thanks Marco. The MAF sensor issue is a real possibility. The ECU is tuned for factory parts so changing the intake could feasibly have a negative effect. However, I would tend to think Acura designed this intake not for straight performance, but as a compromise between performance and ride quality (not too loud). I would expect a less restrictive intake to provide more power, equal power, but definitely not less power. Strange. Really someone needs to dyno this thing properly before and after. I know that is time consuming and expensive though. Oh well....
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 11:32 AM
  #17  
Mr Marco's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Likes: 609
^ Agreed, The twisty baffles of that intake are meant to tame that roar to a whoosh. I never could understand how those engineers come up with such restrictive intakes and exhausts. Check out this down-pipe (top) on our RDX's:
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #18  
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
COTM Coordinator
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 15
From: Apple Valley, Ca
^ thats ridiculously restrictive. I can only imagine how much power was freed up from putting the aftermarket DP in place.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 12:25 PM
  #19  
suspekt360's Avatar
CLS^6
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 30
Reviving this thread....

So to remove resonator DUCTING ONLY (or to cut it so that resonator box is no longer directly attached) do you have to remove the bumper? It seems that nothing really needs to be removed from the cars intake system except to either remove the ducting (between resonator box and upper intake) or to cut it and potentially add in a velocity stack.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2014 | 06:52 PM
  #20  
wreak's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 325
Originally Posted by Mr Marco
^^^^Here you go:
Someone has actually dyno'd the takeda intake and it does provide about 5 whp.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2014 | 12:53 AM
  #21  
23109VC's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 104
i've also read posts where people who installed the Takeda were convinced their car lost power.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2014 | 07:40 AM
  #22  
beat's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 76
Likes: 9
From: Montreal, Canada
Lol, the car don't lose power but you don't gain 100whp either... I didnt feel any power loss here.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2014 | 08:23 AM
  #23  
wreak's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 325
Originally Posted by 23109VC
i've also read posts where people who installed the Takeda were convinced their car lost power.
We swapped out the stock intake for a Takeda short ram on the Dyno (so weather and dyno calibrations would not be a factor). Takeda considers this to be a cold air intake (CAI) because it takes air from the remaining stock system which Acura considers to be a CAI. Here are the results (about 5WHP and 6 torque).





Source: https://acurazine.com/forums/perform...8s-19s-911877/
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 08:03 AM
  #24  
liquidneon's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 386
Likes: 31
From: Toronto
so potentially +5HP, +6torque...
what about sound? Does it have a little more of a growl with the Takeda?
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 08:05 AM
  #25  
beat's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 76
Likes: 9
From: Montreal, Canada
The sound is insane past 4.7k rpm.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 08:10 AM
  #26  
liquidneon's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 386
Likes: 31
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by beat
The sound is insane past 4.7k rpm.
lol insane... not sure I like the sound of that...I want to add a little more growl so it sounds meaner. But I don't want my bluetooth calls to suffer if it's stupidly loud.

What's it like up to 3500 rpm? Noticeable difference?

Anyone in Southern Ontario have one installed? I'd love to hear it.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 08:18 AM
  #27  
beat's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 76
Likes: 9
From: Montreal, Canada
Lol. Didnt meant insane by TOO loud, just sounds good.


Theres a few other on youtube. I took one in WOT also.

Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 08:37 AM
  #28  
wreak's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 325
Originally Posted by liquidneon
lol insane... not sure I like the sound of that...I want to add a little more growl so it sounds meaner. But I don't want my bluetooth calls to suffer if it's stupidly loud.

What's it like up to 3500 rpm? Noticeable difference?

Anyone in Southern Ontario have one installed? I'd love to hear it.
The sound is entirely dependant on your throttle position, you can drive around normally under light-moderate throttle and nobody will even know you have it installed, it's when you get heavy on the throttle that it begins to sing.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 08:54 AM
  #29  
ucf_bronco's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 555
From: Orlando, FL
By insane he means it adds a huge smile to your face.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 11:21 AM
  #30  
mr_raja's Avatar
Love Guru
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 274
Likes: 49
From: Germantown
Originally Posted by ucf_bronco
By insane he means it adds a huge smile to your face.
^This just made me place an order for a Takeda Black SAI. My Christmas gift to myself.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 09:14 PM
  #31  
KarKraze's Avatar
Drifting
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 673
From: Ontario Canada
Someone above said that Takeda considers this a cold air intake,it is not. The stock resonator tube that remains in place after installation of the Takeda will allow outside air into the engine compartment, being that it is not enclosed around the filter it will never be effective as a true cold air intake like the IceBox.

Two things i noticed when i had the Takeda were.......engine would bog down at rpm over 6k and during warm temperature the car would lose power,most likely to heat soak.After removing the Takeda and going back to the stock intake those issues were resolved and the car pulled better.

I believe many people associate the growl from the Takeda with an increase in performance,something similar to a placebo effect of having a loud exhaust.

I currently have the IceBox and if i had to make the choice again i would definitely go with the IceBox again or stay stock.Others may have a different experience, i am just sharing mine.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2014 | 09:21 PM
  #32  
suspekt360's Avatar
CLS^6
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 30
Originally Posted by KarKraze
Someone above said that Takeda considers this a cold air intake,it is not. The stock resonator tube that remains in place after installation of the Takeda will allow outside air into the engine compartment, being that it is not enclosed around the filter it will never be effective as a true cold air intake like the IceBox.

Two things i noticed when i had the Takeda were.......engine would bog down at rpm over 6k and during warm temperature the car would lose power,most likely to heat soak.After removing the Takeda and going back to the stock intake those issues were resolved and the car pulled better.

I believe many people associate the growl from the Takeda with an increase in performance,something similar to a placebo effect of having a loud exhaust.

I currently have the IceBox and if i had to make the choice again i would definitely go with the IceBox again or stay stock.Others may have a different experience, i am just sharing mine.
So would you say icebox outperforms stock? Mine will be here shortly so I will be able to provide a review of icebox/j pipe v2 combo soon.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 05:09 AM
  #33  
KarKraze's Avatar
Drifting
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 673
From: Ontario Canada
Originally Posted by suspekt360
So would you say icebox outperforms stock? Mine will be here shortly so I will be able to provide a review of icebox/j pipe v2 combo soon.
I did the IceBox and the lightweight pulley the same time,i love the result of both mods.
The removal of the stock restrictive intake resonators, replaced by the larger diameter tubing and less restrictive IceBox opens up the engine nicely.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 08:33 AM
  #34  
liquidneon's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 386
Likes: 31
From: Toronto
godamnit I'm too rookie for this stuff.

I'd love a relatively inexpensive mod (under $1K) that could add A BIT of sound when I rip it - not when I'm driving nice (under 3000RPM).

Losing ANY performance is a big minus.
Adding performance not a huge deal... I doubt I'd notice 5HP anyway.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 08:41 AM
  #35  
wreak's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 325
Typically a less restrictive intake will cause a VERY slight loss of low end power with a decent upper RPM gain. At the end of the day I think most people buy intakes because they're fun to install, sound cool, and give you a little extra pep during spirited driving. I just ordered one for my car and I will give a dead honest review on it after install (it should arrive next Tuesday).
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 08:56 AM
  #36  
liquidneon's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 386
Likes: 31
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by wreak
Typically a less restrictive intake will cause a VERY slight loss of low end power with a decent upper RPM gain. At the end of the day I think most people buy intakes because they're fun to install, sound cool, and give you a little extra pep during spirited driving. I just ordered one for my car and I will give a dead honest review on it after install (it should arrive next Tuesday).
sounds great - thanks! I look fwd to your results! How much did you pay for it? Installing it yourself I presume?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 09:08 AM
  #37  
wreak's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 325
Originally Posted by liquidneon
sounds great - thanks! I look fwd to your results! How much did you pay for it? Installing it yourself I presume?
Yes I'll install it myself, I'm in Canada so I bought from a Canadian supplier to avoid customs charges. Total cost was $290 CND or $250 USD including tax and shipping. I think a couple suppliers in the US sell it pretty low, I saw it listed at $180 USD on one site (not including tax/shipping of course).
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 09:53 AM
  #38  
KarKraze's Avatar
Drifting
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 673
From: Ontario Canada
Originally Posted by liquidneon
godamnit I'm too rookie for this stuff.

I'd love a relatively inexpensive mod (under $1K) that could add A BIT of sound when I rip it - not when I'm driving nice (under 3000RPM).

Losing ANY performance is a big minus.
Adding performance not a huge deal... I doubt I'd notice 5HP anyway.
What "Wreck" mentioned is correct. During normal / regular driving you will not even know you have an intake, open the throttle and the Takeda does sound awesome , not intrusive at all.

My biggest issue with it was during the summer months when it got hot, humid and muggy. The car lost power, you would not notice it it the morning due to the cooler temp but doing the same drive in the afternoon it was noticeable. Stock I had no issues.

The other difference between the IceBox an the Takeda is where it draws air from. The Icebox tubing runs to the side of the car just behind the bumper/ skirt area. The stock resonator which the Takeda get some extra air from is at the front by the grille area, IMO the location for the IceBox is better for cooler air.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 10:22 AM
  #39  
suspekt360's Avatar
CLS^6
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 30
Originally Posted by KarKraze
What "Wreck" mentioned is correct. During normal / regular driving you will not even know you have an intake, open the throttle and the Takeda does sound awesome , not intrusive at all.

My biggest issue with it was during the summer months when it got hot, humid and muggy. The car lost power, you would not notice it it the morning due to the cooler temp but doing the same drive in the afternoon it was noticeable. Stock I had no issues.

The other difference between the IceBox an the Takeda is where it draws air from. The Icebox tubing runs to the side of the car just behind the bumper/ skirt area. The stock resonator which the Takeda get some extra air from is at the front by the grille area, IMO the location for the IceBox is better for cooler air.
The three main mods I think worth doing are:
- Long J Pipe with cat delete ~ $425-$475
- CT Icebox ~ $495-$525
- Lightweight crank pulley ~ $200
So roughly $1,200.

I picked up Icebox and J Pipe from the BM.

You might pick up 12whp, maybe 20whp... that is a hotly debated topic here.

I think the J Pipe and Icebox have little to no downside. With J Pipe, I think the car just drives better (has a nice tone with stock piping) and pulls to redline with much more authority.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2014 | 10:37 AM
  #40  
KarKraze's Avatar
Drifting
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 673
From: Ontario Canada
^^^ very nice list, I would add the HPFC.

That is one of the mods that I really enjoy having on my car.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.