My 3.7 mani, ZDX TB, and pnp runners build thread
#201
All motor
You don't need the EGR pipe. Mine didn't even fit. ILC did yours? I doubt that's why my CEL pops every 200 miles.
#203
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Can anyone confirm what size silicone coupler/reducer I need to mate the AEM V1 to the ZDX TB?
I measured the OD on the inlet of the ZDX TB and came up with a hair over 3.25", so 3.25 will work on that end. I looked under my hood and the reducer on there now steps down slightly from the intake to the stock TB. I'm guessing it's a 3.25-3.00".
I'm thinking I need a straight 3.25-3.25"??
I measured the OD on the inlet of the ZDX TB and came up with a hair over 3.25", so 3.25 will work on that end. I looked under my hood and the reducer on there now steps down slightly from the intake to the stock TB. I'm guessing it's a 3.25-3.00".
I'm thinking I need a straight 3.25-3.25"??
#205
All motor
I have the V1 as well and it fits fine with my 3" to 3" reducer. My buddy just heated up one side and stretched it over the TL throttle body. The V1 is 3" OD, like 2.75 ID.
Can anyone confirm what size silicone coupler/reducer I need to mate the AEM V1 to the ZDX TB?
I measured the OD on the inlet of the ZDX TB and came up with a hair over 3.25", so 3.25 will work on that end. I looked under my hood and the reducer on there now steps down slightly from the intake to the stock TB. I'm guessing it's a 3.25-3.00".
I'm thinking I need a straight 3.25-3.25"??
I measured the OD on the inlet of the ZDX TB and came up with a hair over 3.25", so 3.25 will work on that end. I looked under my hood and the reducer on there now steps down slightly from the intake to the stock TB. I'm guessing it's a 3.25-3.00".
I'm thinking I need a straight 3.25-3.25"??
#206
Pro
#207
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
yeah i didn't transfer any of that stuff over. Just bought the 3.7 manifold and plopped it in and it worked just fine, lol. I also just passed emissions the other day.
#209
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
I measured the circumference on the AEM and got 10.25 which comes out to 3.25 OD. I'm guessing the reducer on there now is 3.25-3.00. I could probably make it work, but they're only around 10 bucks, so I'll just order one.
#210
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Ok, I'm confused on Maxbore's pricing:
TB boring price list
PLEASE CLICK ON "PLACE AN ORDER" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE TO PAY USING PAYPAL
All the prices listed throughout the website include return shipping. what I list is what you pay.
CABLE OR DRIVE BY WIRE TBs, ALL BRANDS.
Stock TBs up to 70mm $125 Paypal or $120 Money Order(M/O) made out to Maxbore.
Stock TBs from 70mm and up $155 Paypal or $150 M/O made out to Maxbore.
HONDA/ACURA/SEADOO, CABLE ACTUATED TBs
$105 paypal or $100 M/O made out to Maxbore.
Is the $105 for only cable actuated Honda/Acura TB's (that's how I'm reading it) or all Honda/Acura TB's in general, including DBW? But, $105 is what I paid last year for my stock one. I measured the ZDX at 69mm, so do I Paypal him 105 or 125?
TB boring price list
PLEASE CLICK ON "PLACE AN ORDER" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE TO PAY USING PAYPAL
All the prices listed throughout the website include return shipping. what I list is what you pay.
CABLE OR DRIVE BY WIRE TBs, ALL BRANDS.
Stock TBs up to 70mm $125 Paypal or $120 Money Order(M/O) made out to Maxbore.
Stock TBs from 70mm and up $155 Paypal or $150 M/O made out to Maxbore.
HONDA/ACURA/SEADOO, CABLE ACTUATED TBs
$105 paypal or $100 M/O made out to Maxbore.
Is the $105 for only cable actuated Honda/Acura TB's (that's how I'm reading it) or all Honda/Acura TB's in general, including DBW? But, $105 is what I paid last year for my stock one. I measured the ZDX at 69mm, so do I Paypal him 105 or 125?
#211
All motor
I gave him $150. I'll PM you an email Anx.
The following users liked this post:
t0talacuratl (11-06-2012)
#214
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Thanks a ton ILC. Looks like I had the IM wrong. It's the 3.7 TL, not the ZDX. I've got HFPC's and the V3 j-pipe. No catback yet but it's on the list.
So for us 04-06 guys, I think this is what we'd be looking at:
The list posted earlier:
94050-08080 NUT, FLANGE (8MM) 4 $0.19 $0.76
95701-08060-08 BOLT, FLANGE (8X60) 4 $0.88 $3.52
17105-RCJ-A01 GASKET, IN. MANIFOLD 1 $36.75 $36.75
92900-08050-3B BOLT, STUD (8X50) 4 $0.81 $3.24
17160-RK2-A00 MANIFOLD, IN. 1 $224.75 $224.75
16176-RYE-A10 GASKET, THROTTLE BODY 3 $0.47 $1.41
16400-RYE-A11 THROTTLE BODY, ELECTRONIC CONTROL (GMD8B) 1 $192.54 $192.54
In addition, the IM cover and the supporting hardware:
http://www.acuraoemparts.com/delray/...All&vinsrch=no
IM:
003 17140-RK1-A01 COVER, IN. MANIFOLD (UPPER) 001 2010 TL 226.98 170.24
Hardware:
002 17112-RKB-003 SEAL, BORE PLATE 001 2010 TL 34.23 25.67
004 17146-R70-A01 GASKET, IN. MANIFOLD COVER (UPPER) 001 2010 TL 26.00 19.50
009 90104-RCJ-A00 BOLT, SPECIAL FLANGE (6X18) 010 2010 TL 2.75 2.06
010 90201-P8E-A00 NUT, CAP (6MM) 002 2010 TL 0.85 0.64
Anything you can see that I'm missing?
So for us 04-06 guys, I think this is what we'd be looking at:
The list posted earlier:
94050-08080 NUT, FLANGE (8MM) 4 $0.19 $0.76
95701-08060-08 BOLT, FLANGE (8X60) 4 $0.88 $3.52
17105-RCJ-A01 GASKET, IN. MANIFOLD 1 $36.75 $36.75
92900-08050-3B BOLT, STUD (8X50) 4 $0.81 $3.24
17160-RK2-A00 MANIFOLD, IN. 1 $224.75 $224.75
16176-RYE-A10 GASKET, THROTTLE BODY 3 $0.47 $1.41
16400-RYE-A11 THROTTLE BODY, ELECTRONIC CONTROL (GMD8B) 1 $192.54 $192.54
In addition, the IM cover and the supporting hardware:
http://www.acuraoemparts.com/delray/...All&vinsrch=no
IM:
003 17140-RK1-A01 COVER, IN. MANIFOLD (UPPER) 001 2010 TL 226.98 170.24
Hardware:
002 17112-RKB-003 SEAL, BORE PLATE 001 2010 TL 34.23 25.67
004 17146-R70-A01 GASKET, IN. MANIFOLD COVER (UPPER) 001 2010 TL 26.00 19.50
009 90104-RCJ-A00 BOLT, SPECIAL FLANGE (6X18) 010 2010 TL 2.75 2.06
010 90201-P8E-A00 NUT, CAP (6MM) 002 2010 TL 0.85 0.64
Anything you can see that I'm missing?
Also you only need two of the 94050-08080 and two 95701-08060-08. There are two studs, 92900-08050-3B that go into the manifold, then the two nuts above secure the TB to those studs, and the two bolts above take care of the other two holes.
Also, way better prices here with half price shipping. I forgot the damn code though for 1/2 shipping:
http://www.oemacuraparts.com/parts-c...ntake-manifold
#216
Green Machine
iTrader: (3)
I completed the install yesterday. I also install my new AEM V2 with a bung for the IAT. After the initial start up, I got a CEL. But after a day of driving, it went away. Didn't notice much yesterday, but today.....OMG! My butt dyno felt a difference; especially mid to top end. Thanks i_love_cars and Sonnick; very satisfied with this mod!
BTW I'm going to the dyno shop next week.
BTW I'm going to the dyno shop next week.
The following users liked this post:
Sonnick (11-08-2012)
#217
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
I completed the install yesterday. I also install my new AEM V2 with a bung for the IAT. After the initial start up, I got a CEL. But after a day of driving, it went away. Didn't notice much yesterday, but today.....OMG! My butt dyno felt a difference; especially mid to top end. Thanks i_love_cars and Sonnick; very satisfied with this mod!
BTW I'm going to the dyno shop next week.
BTW I'm going to the dyno shop next week.
and yes, mid to top-end gains quite a bit from this.
#218
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
I completed the install yesterday. I also install my new AEM V2 with a bung for the IAT. After the initial start up, I got a CEL. But after a day of driving, it went away. Didn't notice much yesterday, but today.....OMG! My butt dyno felt a difference; especially mid to top end. Thanks i_love_cars and Sonnick; very satisfied with this mod!
BTW I'm going to the dyno shop next week.
BTW I'm going to the dyno shop next week.
#220
Green Machine
iTrader: (3)
Ok sorry for the late post. Got my dyno last Wed on a Dynojet. I’m having issues posting my actual dyno sheet, but the following is the data from the before dyno with the PnP stock IM and the after dyno with the 4G IM/ZDX TB.
Dyno run 06 Jan 12: First run - 252HP/224TQ
Second run – 251HP/225TQ
Third run – 251HP/226TQ
Air/fuel - 14
Air temp - 72
Humidity - 8
Pressure - 30
Dyno run 14 Nov 12: First run – 253HP/222TQ
Second run – 255HP/224TQ
Third run – 253HP/224TQ
Air/fuel -10
Air temp - 51
Humidity - 35
Pressure -31
According to the dynos, I only got a 3hp gain, but 2tq lost. So the swap wasn't much different from the PnP don't on my stock IM. With that being said, I still love the swap for three reasons. The weight lost, looks better and cooler IM due to the magnesium.
Dyno run 06 Jan 12: First run - 252HP/224TQ
Second run – 251HP/225TQ
Third run – 251HP/226TQ
Air/fuel - 14
Air temp - 72
Humidity - 8
Pressure - 30
Dyno run 14 Nov 12: First run – 253HP/222TQ
Second run – 255HP/224TQ
Third run – 253HP/224TQ
Air/fuel -10
Air temp - 51
Humidity - 35
Pressure -31
According to the dynos, I only got a 3hp gain, but 2tq lost. So the swap wasn't much different from the PnP don't on my stock IM. With that being said, I still love the swap for three reasons. The weight lost, looks better and cooler IM due to the magnesium.
The following users liked this post:
DomGSR-T (11-17-2012)
#223
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Ok sorry for the late post. Got my dyno last Wed on a Dynojet. I’m having issues posting my actual dyno sheet, but the following is the data from the before dyno with the PnP stock IM and the after dyno with the 4G IM/ZDX TB.
Dyno run 06 Jan 12: First run - 252HP/224TQ
Second run – 251HP/225TQ
Third run – 251HP/226TQ
Air/fuel - 14
Air temp - 72
Humidity - 8
Pressure - 30
Dyno run 14 Nov 12: First run – 253HP/222TQ
Second run – 255HP/224TQ
Third run – 253HP/224TQ
Air/fuel -10
Air temp - 51
Humidity - 35
Pressure -31
According to the dynos, I only got a 3hp gain, but 2tq lost. So the swap wasn't much different from the PnP don't on my stock IM. With that being said, I still love the swap for three reasons. The weight lost, looks better and cooler IM due to the magnesium.
Dyno run 06 Jan 12: First run - 252HP/224TQ
Second run – 251HP/225TQ
Third run – 251HP/226TQ
Air/fuel - 14
Air temp - 72
Humidity - 8
Pressure - 30
Dyno run 14 Nov 12: First run – 253HP/222TQ
Second run – 255HP/224TQ
Third run – 253HP/224TQ
Air/fuel -10
Air temp - 51
Humidity - 35
Pressure -31
According to the dynos, I only got a 3hp gain, but 2tq lost. So the swap wasn't much different from the PnP don't on my stock IM. With that being said, I still love the swap for three reasons. The weight lost, looks better and cooler IM due to the magnesium.
#224
Racer
iTrader: (2)
I weighed everything together at the same time to get the true weight savings. Each mani was weighed With cover and TB bolted on and the difference was only 5.5lbs. At first the 3.7 mani seems a ton lighter because the butterflies are not in it, they are located in the cover so the cover on the 3.7 is much heavier which negates some of the weight savings. To make it a fair comparison everything replaced must be weighed.
#226
All motor
Total, look at the difference in your AFR. That's crazy. That's your issue right there. If you can post your dyno that would be great. The AFR change seems extreme. What are your mods? I think you need to do the ported runners as well, that may help.
Were the correction factors the same? Is it the same dyno? What kind of dyno? Like I said, my manifold was ported as well and I still gained 15whp. I also have the ported runners, gasket matched manifold, and bored TB as well.
Were the correction factors the same? Is it the same dyno? What kind of dyno? Like I said, my manifold was ported as well and I still gained 15whp. I also have the ported runners, gasket matched manifold, and bored TB as well.
#227
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Good catch, Sonnick. That's pig rich, which is odd, considering this mod should lean things out, if anything.
Has anything wierd been going on with the car, Total? Wondering if something else is up.
Has anything wierd been going on with the car, Total? Wondering if something else is up.
#228
Green Machine
iTrader: (3)
Ok finally able to post up my dyno's.
Here is the before dyno. Disregard the 016 run; the shop did not compare the highest numbers.
Run 015 is the highest run prior to stock TB, PnP IM, stock runners...
Here is the run after the swap....ZDX TB, 4G IM, stock runners
2004 Acura TL 6MT, 160,000 miles
Mod list as follows: AEM CAI V2, 4G Intake Manifold, ZDX Throttle body, RV6 Precat Deletes V3, RV6 V3 J-pipe, Custom Catback (Greddy piping, Magnaflow/Vibrant resonators, and Borla mufflers), Outlaw Intake Manifold Spacer, Clutch Masters Stage 3 w/Lightweight Flywheel, Check Valve Delete, HT-Spec Version 2.0 Type-II Coilovers, Innovative Motor Mounts.
Here is the before dyno. Disregard the 016 run; the shop did not compare the highest numbers.
Run 015 is the highest run prior to stock TB, PnP IM, stock runners...
Here is the run after the swap....ZDX TB, 4G IM, stock runners
2004 Acura TL 6MT, 160,000 miles
Mod list as follows: AEM CAI V2, 4G Intake Manifold, ZDX Throttle body, RV6 Precat Deletes V3, RV6 V3 J-pipe, Custom Catback (Greddy piping, Magnaflow/Vibrant resonators, and Borla mufflers), Outlaw Intake Manifold Spacer, Clutch Masters Stage 3 w/Lightweight Flywheel, Check Valve Delete, HT-Spec Version 2.0 Type-II Coilovers, Innovative Motor Mounts.
#229
Green Machine
iTrader: (3)
Ok got ahead of myself here; the numbers below is the stock TB, PnP IM, stock runners.
Dyno run 06 Jan 12: First run - 252HP/224TQ
Second run – 251HP/225TQ
Third run – 251HP/226TQ
Air/fuel - 14
Air temp - 72
Humidity - 8
Pressure - 30
I was sent a zip file of all of my runs by the shop, but can't figure out the program to download and open them. Sonnick, I can send you the files if you can take a look at them.
Dyno run 06 Jan 12: First run - 252HP/224TQ
Second run – 251HP/225TQ
Third run – 251HP/226TQ
Air/fuel - 14
Air temp - 72
Humidity - 8
Pressure - 30
I was sent a zip file of all of my runs by the shop, but can't figure out the program to download and open them. Sonnick, I can send you the files if you can take a look at them.
#230
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
So you went from 239 to low 250's with the only mod being porting the stock manifold? IIRC, didn't you do a lighter flywheel during that time frame as well? That may have freed up a few of those extra horses, but the porting was probably responsible for the majority of it. Also, I bet the Outlaw spacer is hurting your top end. I remember reading that P2R said once you start porting/polishing the manifold/runners/TB, the addition of the MDX spacer would hurt top end power if you also had PCD's. I don't know the size of the Outlaw (don't think it's as thick as the MDX), but it still might be hurting the top end with the freer flowing manifold/TB.
#231
All motor
That spacer is definitely hurting your top end a bit. Also, not taking anything away from the V3 pipe because it's a great piece, but I think the primaries are just too long once you mix them with the PCDs. I think a shorter primary length is optimal once you incorporate the PCDs into the equation. This is just my opinion though.
Btw, the AFR looks pretty similar between the 2 runs with the exception of 6500 to redline. What happened in the last graph with the blue line?
Btw, the AFR looks pretty similar between the 2 runs with the exception of 6500 to redline. What happened in the last graph with the blue line?
#233
Green Machine
iTrader: (3)
So you went from 239 to low 250's with the only mod being porting the stock manifold? IIRC, didn't you do a lighter flywheel during that time frame as well? That may have freed up a few of those extra horses, but the porting was probably responsible for the majority of it. Also, I bet the Outlaw spacer is hurting your top end. I remember reading that P2R said once you start porting/polishing the manifold/runners/TB, the addition of the MDX spacer would hurt top end power if you also had PCD's. I don't know the size of the Outlaw (don't think it's as thick as the MDX), but it still might be hurting the top end with the freer flowing manifold/TB.
That spacer is definitely hurting your top end a bit. Also, not taking anything away from the V3 pipe because it's a great piece, but I think the primaries are just too long once you mix them with the PCDs. I think a shorter primary length is optimal once you incorporate the PCDs into the equation. This is just my opinion though.
Btw, the AFR looks pretty similar between the 2 runs with the exception of 6500 to redline. What happened in the last graph with the blue line?
Btw, the AFR looks pretty similar between the 2 runs with the exception of 6500 to redline. What happened in the last graph with the blue line?
As far as the AFR, not sure what happened there. I could ask the shop what's going on there.
I can't say for sure man; I wasn't in the bay during the run. They just had the monitor to watch the analog/digital gauges in the waiting room.
#234
All motor
Like I said it's not a fact, it's just what I think. That's why we need some dyno's of 1 car with the different Jpipes and PCDs. That would explain it all.
OP, any updates?
OP, any updates?
#235
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Sheeee's a big one!
81mm inlet/71-72 outlet. Got the P2R gasket and coupler and clamps. Fed Ex tried to drop off the manifold and everything else today, but I was gone. They'll be back Friday, so I should be able to do the swap then.
81mm inlet/71-72 outlet. Got the P2R gasket and coupler and clamps. Fed Ex tried to drop off the manifold and everything else today, but I was gone. They'll be back Friday, so I should be able to do the swap then.
#239
All motor
^ Thanks to you I spoke to him. Good work man.