Im hungry for Mustangs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 09:50 PM
  #201  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by Joe5.0
I know the thread has been all over the place, but let me ask you this - why not just keep your TL as a nice DD and get a Mustang as your 'fun' car?

You can get a mildly modded GT/Cobra for around $10k, and no it will not run 11's but it'll sound good and if you desire really fast times its just some $$$ away.

I have spent more money on my Cobra than I planned to, but its dead reliable, sounds pretty badass (IMO), and if I was just after hp numbers I could have thrown a turbo on and made 450rwhp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UZmtYmynpU

It made 411rwhp/395rwtq, all motor 93 octane pump gas. I probably left 10-20rwhp on the table since the a/f is so "safe" (rich). Not too bad for the 'slow' mustang generation I have surprised more than a couple fast cars that thinks its just another loud, but slow, mustang.

I'm getting old, it took me a while to realize what generation that was. I was looking for a 4V motor.

Stroker 302? Not bad at all, I bet it runs good. As civilized as everything is these days, I really miss the lope like your car has.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #202  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
IHC -

How about this line of thought


True that a rwd will transfer a lot of weight to the rear wheels to assist bite. Wight transfer plus sticky tires equals a win. But……

If this is a DD, I doubt that it will be rolling on drag radials during it’s daily commutes. With normal street tires (no R compound), there will be little to no weight transfer because that initial bite is not there to get the transfer started.

When it spins, you MUST back-out as mentioned. But in a stoplight challenge, you will lose the race by having to back-out of the throttle. High HP is of no use if you must back-out of the throttle to make correction for the rear-end getting sideways.

This is what made me pick the EVO. It does not need 600-800 hp. Just an awesome holeshot plus 400-500 whp plus no squireliness requiring backing-out of the throttle equals a win for a DD doing 0-100 mph sprints.

In a true street tire to street tire competition the AWD will win. There are of course always exceptions. Take someone who is exceptionally good at launching a RWD car and someone who is afraid of launching the AWD car to it's potential and you can get a RWD win. I've done it several times. Take the driver out of the equation and use both cars to their potential, the AWD car is going to win... Only exceptions to this would be a mid or rear engine car. But definately AWD>RWD on true street tire with all else being equal.

As I've said, I've run the car on true street tires and even at the track. It's "fun" but not competitive. Drag radials level the playing field with AWD. The reason I'm so quick to suggest DRs is because the only downside is quicker wear. Handling is fine, wet traction ok, they are a real daily driver street tire but you have to plan on replacing them more often. I look at it as maintenence costs.

I understand one person's idea of a DD car vs another. I've run the car mostly on Hoosier Quick Time Pros in the last years it was running. I would never recommend these to anyone... ever, without several warnings. They're legal but not a "street tire". Cornering is sloppy and almost dangerous. You can't take them on the freeway. You look like you're driving drunk all the time. Wear. You'll spin out if you run over spit on the ground, etc. But you can load up the car and take the family out of town on a DR with no compromises.

In regards to the tire spin, you learn where the limit is very quickly and you can keep the car right on that limit of traction. If you're looking for something requiring less driver input, the AWD will be better.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 10:17 PM
  #203  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Just for fun, the same truck I posted earlier with the in truck camera on a 6psi launch. Very drama free for 500+hp but you can tell it still spins a little.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZuIZmP1LDI
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 12:10 AM
  #204  
Hi speed's Avatar
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 256
There is the down low on hi output engines is I under stand it. The EVO is a 2.0 liter engine that makes 120-150 hp without the turbo, add the turbo and they make 250-300 hp. Double the non boosted hp. Kick the boost up and make 360 WHP and now you are making 3x the stock power, add in drivetrain loss for a 4 wheel drive and the engine is making 420 WHP. Kick the boost up more to make 400+ WHP and now your looking at 500+ hp at the crank almost 5x the stock hp. That takes it toll on parts and causes a he'll of a lot more wear and stress.

Last edited by Hi speed; Sep 16, 2010 at 12:14 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 12:30 AM
  #205  
Hi speed's Avatar
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 256
This is what the WRX guy is saying, asking that much of a engine is asking for trouble unless you throw serious $$$$ at it and now you are breaking stuff left and right since the cat was designed to run a lot less power. You can beef up anything, but starting with an engine that makes more N/A power will help with longevity. I think AWD is cool but the drivetrain loss and lack of displacement is a no go. I would even race most subies since they could jump from a light but couldn't keep acceleration up. I always felt like I
Was doing a ricer fly by since the AWD killed so much of the power and acceleration.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #206  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by Hi speed
This is what the WRX guy is saying, asking that much of a engine is asking for trouble unless you throw serious $$$$ at it and now you are breaking stuff left and right since the cat was designed to run a lot less power. You can beef up anything, but starting with an engine that makes more N/A power will help with longevity. I think AWD is cool but the drivetrain loss and lack of displacement is a no go. I would even race most subies since they could jump from a light but couldn't keep acceleration up. I always felt like I
Was doing a ricer fly by since the AWD killed so much of the power and acceleration.

NA hp doesn't make a difference in reliabiilty. As long you you have "turbo" internals you're good to go. I'm sure the internals are much beefier on the EVO than the base Lancer. All that matters is total hp as far as stress on parts goes. I dyno'd my turbo car with no boost many years ago just for fun and it couldn't even break 200whp but it's been very reliable where it's at.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 08:40 AM
  #207  
Joe5.0's Avatar
TQ > MPG
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by I hate cars
I'm getting old, it took me a while to realize what generation that was. I was looking for a 4V motor.

Stroker 302? Not bad at all, I bet it runs good. As civilized as everything is these days, I really miss the lope like your car has.

You can tell it has a cam, but to be honest the tach is dead steady, it doesnt bounce at all.

And it has 4 valves, for every 2 cylinders.

It runs really streetable, considering its only 5.7L and is making 411rwhp (or about 470 flywheel). Its not sneaking up anyone though.

What makes me upset is that the '11 5.0 can make similar hp numbers to mine, all while not being loud, running hot, or getting 12mpg.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 09:28 AM
  #208  
NCTL05's Avatar
Middle Finger anyone?
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 843
Likes: 13
From: Charlotte, NC
Holy shit guys! Video overload!!!! Thanks for giving me something to do at work.

I don't know where this thread is heading, but since the OP hasn't made a comment in awhile I wonder if he's traded in his car yet? I think he should swap in a v8.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:01 PM
  #209  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
Regarding using a small engine and boosting the hell out of it –

For someone like me, this is just the thing that I am looking for. You know what my main secret is….... gutted. So, having a power plant that has an extremely high output versus the engine’s weight is a huge advantage to my overall game plan (lightweight).


Source(click here)
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #210  
Majofo's Avatar
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 88,888
Likes: 11,846
From: Waffles, BU
I vote Ferrari Inacc
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #211  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by Majofo
I vote Ferrari Inacc
X2. Start with a factory boosted lightweight like the F40. Jack the boost up and lighten it even more. Weren't those things like 2,800lbs from the factory? The only thing I didn't like was the tiny V8 but with enough boost it will make power.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #212  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
#ForcedInductionFamily
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 846
Likes: 5
Keep in mind that the FQ400 is not available here in the states and it is technically a "factory modified" car. You can mod a V8 with similar results. I would take that list with a grain of salt, rotary fanbois will hate me for saying this but they tout how amazing that power per liter rating is of the Renesis engine and that car is slow as shit, unreliable and terrible on gas mileage.

Modded v8 + your trademark weight reduction = destroying modded 4 bangers that don't have $40,000 in the engine / suspension / chassis.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #213  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
When AWD doesn't grab....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGZe63zf2R0
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #214  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
Well, I know that the AWD is not a "Magic Traction Wand"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-PIu...eature=channel

Last edited by Inaccurate; Sep 16, 2010 at 01:56 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:51 PM
  #215  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
I vote Ferrari
Come’on guys….. multitask . We need -

Inexpensive (15-20k price Used, it will be gutted)
Daily driver
Not a thief magnet
Modded with emphasis on 0-100 mph sprints
Best traction on normal tires on normal streets
Quickest launch with least squireliness
Sleeper image (ugly is a plus)
Superb handling
Great suspension for going fast on city streets
Lightweight (or, ability to be gutted)
Great aftermarket support
Potential for make 500 whp with mods
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #216  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by I hate cars
When AWD doesn't grab....
But, you had to find a slippery wet asphalt surface to show the awd fighting for traction
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #217  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
But, you had to find a slippery wet asphalt surface to show the awd fighting for traction

True. That one wasn't so bad but on dry asphalt, my friend's Typhoon gets a little scary. The rear didn't slide like the one in the video, the entire truck went sideways. Not fun but it's rare for it to happen.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 02:23 PM
  #218  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by I hate cars
True. That one wasn't so bad but on dry asphalt, my friend's Typhoon gets a little scary. The rear didn't slide like the one in the video, the entire truck went sideways. Not fun but it's rare for it to happen.
I have seen some videos of EVO's doing the same thing of jumping to the left during the launch event. But, it was those extreme 10-second rides doing it.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 03:43 PM
  #219  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
#ForcedInductionFamily
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 846
Likes: 5
It seems like you're dead set on an EVO, but you just mentioned above that 500whp is your goal. And I am telling you right now to go ahead and start saving at least $20,000 if not quite a bit more for the project to make it somewhat reliable. Keep in mind also that "boy racer" cars like STIs / EVOs attract a LOT of attention, generally unwanted, from the younger crowd looking to street race and from the police.

With that said, surprisingly not many people ever tried to race me really when I took the STI out. Probably because it sounded like a freight train when the EWG opened up haha .
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #220  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
As you have said, I have read on the evo forums that around 400 whp was the top before needing intense modding.

I have yet to read anything about STI’s. What power levels are the STI guys reaching?

I mainly want the whole package that I listed above. I forgot to include that it be easy to work on. That little 4 cylinder looks to be fairly easy to hoist out of the bay.

I am willing to settle for around 400 whp just to get the overall package that I listed.

I was already guessing that about the cop attention. Got to camouflage that thing to be a sleeper….some satin black paint, remove the wing, higher ride height from weight loss, ugly rims.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 04:52 PM
  #221  
Joe5.0's Avatar
TQ > MPG
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8
From: Metro Detroit
Good luck with your search, I predict it will cost twice the amount of $$ as you think it will.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #222  
Aman's Avatar
Your Friendly Canadian
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
This might not get the best reception, but what about a Volvo S60R or something? Bonus points if you get the wagon.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #223  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 933
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Inaccurate, have you considered a BMW 335? Doesn't take a ton of dough to get them up to 400+ whp, it won't attract the attention of the cops like an Evo, and it's more of a sleeper. If you're dead set on AWD, you can get the 335xi. Once you strip it down, the extra weight won't matter much. It's over your budget now, but if you're not planning on buying for awhile, I bet you can find an '07 for 20k in another year and a half or so.

And then there's always the 135. That car would be sick with 400-500 whp and a few hundred pounds removed.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 07:44 PM
  #224  
Ramrodthrusterpuppy's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 4
From: Ottawa, Canaduh!
Originally Posted by Aman
This might not get the best reception, but what about a Volvo S60R or something? Bonus points if you get the wagon.
Love those S60Rs...almost got one before the TL-S.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #225  
Majofo's Avatar
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 88,888
Likes: 11,846
From: Waffles, BU
135.. now we're talking.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #226  
tenzingsherpa's Avatar
J36Twingt28r's,nextgt30r
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 408
Likes: 2
From: lebanon, pa
evo>sti for most power for $ put in.

i have 2 guys in my car crew one has a sti and the other a evo 8. the evo 8 guy invested about 10k he told me to make 450whp 430lb torque. on the other hand the guy with the sti has spent double that and still isn't making the same hp as the evo 8. before anyone says anything about the sti guy not knowing his stuff he had his car built exclusively by blouch turbo performance here in lebanon, pa.

innaccurate for maximum power, affordability, and Daily driver all year round i would definately choose a evo. preferably evo 8 & 9 since their bottom ends are "bulletproof".

my 2 cents...... thanks for listening
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 08:50 AM
  #227  
MichaelBenz's Avatar
CTS-V Import Slayer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 18
From: Fishers, IN
Back to beating the mustangs....this ones a V6 on a bottle...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iNQzORkpaw
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #228  
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
Suzuka Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 1,272
That car would get dragged up & back down the strip out here.
Edit*
That wasn't even a fast 12 second pass; 12.7.

Last edited by Rick_TL-S; Sep 17, 2010 at 11:05 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #229  
MichaelBenz's Avatar
CTS-V Import Slayer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 18
From: Fishers, IN
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
That car would get dragged up & back down the strip out here.
Edit*
That wasn't even a fast 12 second pass; 12.7.
Duh. Its a V6 Ford...what can you expect?

BTW...might be from "out there"....I just copped that off the net. I have absolutely no idea where that is from.

Nonetheless...it is what it is for an old ford v6....which is dogshit right out of the box IMO.

Edit:

But for the sake of arguement....can you get this out of a TL? Just wondering? Not sure what those new Turbo kits are turning honestly...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yfboHTm_wA

Last edited by MichaelBenz; Sep 17, 2010 at 12:16 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #230  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
#ForcedInductionFamily
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 846
Likes: 5
There are a couple of turbo V6 Mustangs on the Mustang Forums running deep into the 11s.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #231  
Majofo's Avatar
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 88,888
Likes: 11,846
From: Waffles, BU
I was in Vegas earlier this year to see fam and for Nascar weekend. They had this bmf featured at the LVMS.



Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:53 PM
  #232  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Nice! Nothing like V8 power with a huge turbo. I assume it's got a liquid/air intercooler in the passenger compartment?
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #233  
Majofo's Avatar
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 88,888
Likes: 11,846
From: Waffles, BU
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #234  
TheChamp531's Avatar
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,022
Likes: 437
From: Houston, Texas
With 20k, I'd think that the TL could get 500WHP and go RWD.

Turbo, or complete LS engine swap. I don't see why you couldn't do it besides the transmission.

I talked to a few people and they said putting a LS8 engine in my TL is easy to an extent, but it will cost me 22.5k with the engine, a reliable transmission (911 transmission) and labor and RWD conversion. I'm not sure if they completely understand the platform of the TL, but they said they can get it done.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #235  
turbocivic94's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
From: CT
TL was made to be a luxury car, not for drag racing. You can make anything fast as long as you have the money.

Stay in Honda family. If you are looking for a fast car with spending less money, buy a integra. Make 600WHP for less thank 10K.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #236  
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
Suzuka Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 1,272
Originally Posted by turbocivic94
TL was made to be a luxury car, not for drag racing. You can make anything fast as long as you have the money.

Stay in Honda family. If you are looking for a fast car with spending less money, buy a integra. Make 600WHP for less thank 10K.
You can do that in a 4th Gen Camaro or Mustang too for less & still be faster.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 12:56 AM
  #237  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 933
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
With 20k, I'd think that the TL could get 500WHP and go RWD.

Turbo, or complete LS engine swap. I don't see why you couldn't do it besides the transmission.

I talked to a few people and they said putting a LS8 engine in my TL is easy to an extent, but it will cost me 22.5k with the engine, a reliable transmission (911 transmission) and labor and RWD conversion. I'm not sure if they completely understand the platform of the TL, but they said they can get it done.
Wait, so they have no experience with TL's, but they're already quoting you hard prices? Do you not see any red flags here?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #238  
NAiL05's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 33
From: Texas
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
With 20k, I'd think that the TL could get 500WHP and go RWD.

Turbo, or complete LS engine swap. I don't see why you couldn't do it besides the transmission.

I talked to a few people and they said putting a LS8 engine in my TL is easy to an extent, but it will cost me 22.5k with the engine, a reliable transmission (911 transmission) and labor and RWD conversion. I'm not sure if they completely understand the platform of the TL, but they said they can get it done.
Sounds like bullshit. Probably blowing smoke up your ass seeing if you believe them.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 08:46 AM
  #239  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
#ForcedInductionFamily
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 846
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
Come’on guys….. multitask . We need -

Inexpensive (15-20k price Used, it will be gutted)
Daily driver
Not a thief magnet
Modded with emphasis on 0-100 mph sprints
Best traction on normal tires on normal streets
Quickest launch with least squireliness
Sleeper image (ugly is a plus)
Superb handling
Great suspension for going fast on city streets
Lightweight (or, ability to be gutted)
Great aftermarket support
Potential for make 500 whp with mods
Thought about an R32? I'm not a huge fan of German cars, especially modded ones because that platform is already unreliable, but I have seen some really sick twin turbo R32s that are probably a complete blast to drive.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 08:50 AM
  #240  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
#ForcedInductionFamily
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 846
Likes: 5
11 second twin turbo R32, 550+hp...imo one of the best looking and best sounding VWs out there as well:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-76eOOtbpY

wow, I can't believe I'm finding myself suggesting a VW! But seriously that car would be so much fun to drive in all weather.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM.