"Pulled the timing out"
"Pulled the timing out"
Does anyone knows what this means??? I read about it on TOV when they were dynoing the 5AT and they were able to get the car to rev higher before it "pulled the timing out" by allowing it to cool and by running the heater to remove more heat from the engine.
Anyway, last night I got in acceleration contest with a 330ci convertable, TWICE, from a stoplight. I got stopped next to them at the light and the guy in the passenger seat was looking over at me all smug like he thought his buddy's beamer was the sh$%. The first time we took off, I didn't totally stomp it, not sure if he was going to take the bait and when I realized we were racing, I floored it and was able to catch up to him and pass him by the time we reached 70 mph, which is when I had to start braking due to the next stop light. At the next light, his buddy wasn't looking so smug anymore. I gave him the old head knodd and then looked up at the light and he shook his head in affirmative. That is when I switched the VSA off, and turned the heater on full blast. When the light changed, he pulled me slightly off the line but then I overtook him quickly and my TL seemed to upshift later to 2nd this time. This time I let off at 80 mph because he was already at least 2 to 3 car lengths behind me. I immediately braked to 45 mph and he kept going, I guess too embarrassed to slow down.
Anyway, last night I got in acceleration contest with a 330ci convertable, TWICE, from a stoplight. I got stopped next to them at the light and the guy in the passenger seat was looking over at me all smug like he thought his buddy's beamer was the sh$%. The first time we took off, I didn't totally stomp it, not sure if he was going to take the bait and when I realized we were racing, I floored it and was able to catch up to him and pass him by the time we reached 70 mph, which is when I had to start braking due to the next stop light. At the next light, his buddy wasn't looking so smug anymore. I gave him the old head knodd and then looked up at the light and he shook his head in affirmative. That is when I switched the VSA off, and turned the heater on full blast. When the light changed, he pulled me slightly off the line but then I overtook him quickly and my TL seemed to upshift later to 2nd this time. This time I let off at 80 mph because he was already at least 2 to 3 car lengths behind me. I immediately braked to 45 mph and he kept going, I guess too embarrassed to slow down.
Originally Posted by TLover
Haha!!! Nice kill.
Way to show those smug Bimmer owners.
Originally Posted by caball88
when you turn the heater to full blast the cooling fans up front do not turn on, therefore less parasitic loss. meaning the engine won't have to waste any power on the fans.
Swat Dude, it's still nice to stick it to those uppity BMW owners, even if they have a seriously slow car.
Pulling timing out means reducing the amount of timing advance before top dead center (BTDC) when the plug fires in relation to piston (crank) location. Firing BTDC, the plug actually fires before the piston reaches the top. The degrees BTDC is the amont of "advance" in degrees the location of the piston is, actually measuring in degrees where crank is compared to it's location when the crank is centered with the piston bore (aka crank top dead center; putting the piston in the highest location) when the plug fires. Reducing timing advance is done to control preignition, however it also cuts into HP. The higher the revs, the more advnace the computer will apply to the timing.
"....they were dynoing the 5AT and they were able to get the car to rev higher before it "pulled the timing out" by allowing it to cool and by running the heater to remove more heat from the engine." doesn't make ANY sense.
The rev limits are hard set by the ECU and cooling or anything else doesn't change it, especially changing the timing. The rev limits there there to keep the motor from coming apart, not to control preignition or any other condition. The ECU also controls timing advance and will reduce the amount of advance if the "knock sensors" detect preignition.
The only thing I can think of when they would say that is that they were able to let the ECU put more advance on the timing because they were able to control preigition by helping it run cooler. But I'm not sure if you can manually set the advance on the TL. But even then a few more degrees of advance isn't going to do much. It depends on how much more they were able to get.
"....they were dynoing the 5AT and they were able to get the car to rev higher before it "pulled the timing out" by allowing it to cool and by running the heater to remove more heat from the engine." doesn't make ANY sense.
The rev limits are hard set by the ECU and cooling or anything else doesn't change it, especially changing the timing. The rev limits there there to keep the motor from coming apart, not to control preignition or any other condition. The ECU also controls timing advance and will reduce the amount of advance if the "knock sensors" detect preignition.
The only thing I can think of when they would say that is that they were able to let the ECU put more advance on the timing because they were able to control preigition by helping it run cooler. But I'm not sure if you can manually set the advance on the TL. But even then a few more degrees of advance isn't going to do much. It depends on how much more they were able to get.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by caball88
when you turn the heater to full blast the cooling fans up front do not turn on, therefore less parasitic loss. meaning the engine won't have to waste any power on the fans.
By turning the heater on full blast, you turn the blower on full - which adds quite a bit to the load on the alternator - and therefore your engine. And, if your coolant temp rises enough your front fans will still come on.
Originally Posted by Skeedatl
Pulling timing out means reducing the amount of timing advance before top dead center.
Originally Posted by TLover
I always heard it referred to as retarding the timing. Never heard "pulling timing out" before.
So while they are similar, people I talk to call pulling timing out of initial advance they call retarding timing, when they pull it out of "full" advance they call it pulling out timing.
Originally Posted by fla-tls
That doesn't make any sense.
By turning the heater on full blast, you turn the blower on full - which adds quite a bit to the load on the alternator - and therefore your engine. And, if your coolant temp rises enough your front fans will still come on.
By turning the heater on full blast, you turn the blower on full - which adds quite a bit to the load on the alternator - and therefore your engine. And, if your coolant temp rises enough your front fans will still come on.
"Pulled the timing out"
Timing (when the spark is delivered to the cylinder) is advanced as the engine speeds up. Retarding timing is a technique to respond to some condition, such as detonation.
I'm speculating, but in this case it seems that this is an ECU function that starts retarding timing at high rpms based on variables including temperature. This is occurring before the fuel cutoff (max RPM). TOV found that dropping coolant temp to 180 prevented this. I wonder if this was a function of the car being on the dyno and running hot - common because the car is not moving. I wonder if pulling timing out was a response to the coolant temp or some other effect caused by the higher temperature at high RPM's. Hmmm...
In the case you described, running the engine with the heater on should not reduce engine coolant temps below where the thermostat is set. The engine would have to be off for this to work.
I'm speculating, but in this case it seems that this is an ECU function that starts retarding timing at high rpms based on variables including temperature. This is occurring before the fuel cutoff (max RPM). TOV found that dropping coolant temp to 180 prevented this. I wonder if this was a function of the car being on the dyno and running hot - common because the car is not moving. I wonder if pulling timing out was a response to the coolant temp or some other effect caused by the higher temperature at high RPM's. Hmmm...
In the case you described, running the engine with the heater on should not reduce engine coolant temps below where the thermostat is set. The engine would have to be off for this to work.
Originally Posted by Skeedatl
This is true. The power has to come from somewhere...whether it's the cooling fans, or heater blowers, it's all coming from the battery and thus the alternator.
I'm going to try hard not to sound like 1le in my response but drag racing is something I've been doing for 25 years. Turning the heater on right before the race will not pull out enough heat to help any, in fact the blowers will offset any kind of benefit (if any) by drawing more juice.
The computer has been set by acura to pull back timing (see Skeedatl's response) which reduces power, if your TL pulled higher the second time it was luck, mine does pull higher at times also.
By the way, good kill! :toothless
The computer has been set by acura to pull back timing (see Skeedatl's response) which reduces power, if your TL pulled higher the second time it was luck, mine does pull higher at times also.
By the way, good kill! :toothless
Originally Posted by Aegir
Timing (when the spark is delivered to the cylinder) is advanced as the engine speeds up. Retarding timing is a technique to respond to some condition, such as detonation.
I'm speculating, but in this case it seems that this is an ECU function that starts retarding timing at high rpms based on variables including temperature. This is occurring before the fuel cutoff (max RPM). TOV found that dropping coolant temp to 180 prevented this. I wonder if this was a function of the car being on the dyno and running hot - common because the car is not moving. I wonder if pulling timing out was a response to the coolant temp or some other effect caused by the higher temperature at high RPM's. Hmmm...
In the case you described, running the engine with the heater on should not reduce engine coolant temps below where the thermostat is set. The engine would have to be off for this to work.
I'm speculating, but in this case it seems that this is an ECU function that starts retarding timing at high rpms based on variables including temperature. This is occurring before the fuel cutoff (max RPM). TOV found that dropping coolant temp to 180 prevented this. I wonder if this was a function of the car being on the dyno and running hot - common because the car is not moving. I wonder if pulling timing out was a response to the coolant temp or some other effect caused by the higher temperature at high RPM's. Hmmm...
In the case you described, running the engine with the heater on should not reduce engine coolant temps below where the thermostat is set. The engine would have to be off for this to work.
Originally Posted by Skeedatl
Pulling timing out means reducing the amount of timing advance before top dead center (BTDC) when the plug fires in relation to piston (crank) location. Firing BTDC, the plug actually fires before the piston reaches the top. The degrees BTDC is the amont of "advance" in degrees the location of the piston is, actually measuring in degrees where crank is compared to it's location when the crank is centered with the piston bore (aka crank top dead center; putting the piston in the highest location) when the plug fires. Reducing timing advance is done to control preignition, however it also cuts into HP. The higher the revs, the more advnace the computer will apply to the timing.
"....they were dynoing the 5AT and they were able to get the car to rev higher before it "pulled the timing out" by allowing it to cool and by running the heater to remove more heat from the engine." doesn't make ANY sense.
The rev limits are hard set by the ECU and cooling or anything else doesn't change it, especially changing the timing. The rev limits there there to keep the motor from coming apart, not to control preignition or any other condition. The ECU also controls timing advance and will reduce the amount of advance if the "knock sensors" detect preignition.
The only thing I can think of when they would say that is that they were able to let the ECU put more advance on the timing because they were able to control preigition by helping it run cooler. But I'm not sure if you can manually set the advance on the TL. But even then a few more degrees of advance isn't going to do much. It depends on how much more they were able to get.
"....they were dynoing the 5AT and they were able to get the car to rev higher before it "pulled the timing out" by allowing it to cool and by running the heater to remove more heat from the engine." doesn't make ANY sense.
The rev limits are hard set by the ECU and cooling or anything else doesn't change it, especially changing the timing. The rev limits there there to keep the motor from coming apart, not to control preignition or any other condition. The ECU also controls timing advance and will reduce the amount of advance if the "knock sensors" detect preignition.
The only thing I can think of when they would say that is that they were able to let the ECU put more advance on the timing because they were able to control preigition by helping it run cooler. But I'm not sure if you can manually set the advance on the TL. But even then a few more degrees of advance isn't going to do much. It depends on how much more they were able to get.
Originally Posted by Swat Dude
I'm not sure about all the fan and blower nonsense above but I think the point some of the guys above were missing is that you use the heater core as an additional cooling device. The heater removes heat from the engine coolant and by running the heater, you increase the surface area by which you are able to remove heat from the engine. You use the heater as a supplemental radiator. Any thoughts Skeed. (Please God, don't let HD get involved here. Next thing you know there will be 50 pages on the flux capacitor)
Hey, Norse, I don't believe you. I need to see some links. :lol2:
Originally Posted by Swat Dude
04TL/AM/Quartz/5AT
What's with the heater? I'm not sure that really helps at all. In theory it might but in the real world I doubt you can really cool the engine fast enough in a stoplight race.
Originally Posted by Zeuser
OK... so you were doing this with a 5AT? Did you simply leave it in "D" or did you use the "M" mode? Next time, try the "L" -> "D" -> "M" method. It feels a bit quicker than the "M" mode.
What's with the heater? I'm not sure that really helps at all. In theory it might but in the real world I doubt you can really cool the engine fast enough in a stoplight race.
What's with the heater? I'm not sure that really helps at all. In theory it might but in the real world I doubt you can really cool the engine fast enough in a stoplight race.
Also, I didn't know about the heater thing but I figured it couldn't hurt.
And BTW, call me an idiot but I ran out of gas the other day and I have to say, DAMN!!!! The steering without the power-assist was extremely heavy. I had to really muscle it to get it to turn and I think my Toyota Sequoia had lighter steering without the motor on (okay that time it was my wife's fault, honest). I wonder how much power the freakin' power steering zaps from the motor.
Originally Posted by TLover
Since we're on the topic of heat and radiators, has anyone put in Redline Water Wetter? I've got a bottle sitting in my car but I have to remove some coolant beforehand. I've put it in other cars and it seems to work.
Hey, Norse, I don't believe you. I need to see some links. :lol2:
Hey, Norse, I don't believe you. I need to see some links. :lol2:
As you probably know, a colder engine isn't necessarily better. The fuel curves programmed into the ECU among other things respond to coolant temp. If the motor is colder, it needs more fuel to run (while you aren't putting in any more air). This rich condition affects it's emissions and can run your MPG up.
When they program the maps, they may for a lean burning engine set the optimum temp at say for example 220F. If through water wetter or other changes get it to run 180F, it won't be using the correct mapping.
Originally Posted by Swat Dude
It is a 5AT and I just left it in drive. Low will upshift by itself to second, correct? And then will it hold second until redline before you pop it to drive?
So here's what I do: Drop it to "L". Stomp on the gas and keep foot all the way down. When I get near redline it tap the shifter up into "D". The tranny then shifts to 2nd gear. Right after the shift I pull the stick ot the left to the "M" and keep doing the upshifts myself.
I've yet to confirm this with real numbers but it does feel like a faster run to 60MPH than either leaving it in "D" or using "M" only.
Originally Posted by Swat Dude
I'm not sure about all the fan and blower nonsense above but I think the point some of the guys above were missing is that you use the heater core as an additional cooling device. The heater removes heat from the engine coolant and by running the heater, you increase the surface area by which you are able to remove heat from the engine. You use the heater as a supplemental radiator. Any thoughts Skeed. (Please God, don't let HD get involved here. Next thing you know there will be 50 pages on the flux capacitor)
It's essentially giving you a larger radiator. I don't know what the watt requirements are for the blower motors, but I'm guessing they are considerable. It's 746 watts per horsepower so if someone happens to know they can see how much HP they are effectively robbing. It could be .1 HP or .5HP possibly. Advancing timing may only be worth a few HP depending on the motor setup so it's not like you're going to go a tenth quicker in the 1/4 running the heater
Originally Posted by fla-tls
That doesn't make any sense.
By turning the heater on full blast, you turn the blower on full - which adds quite a bit to the load on the alternator - and therefore your engine. And, if your coolant temp rises enough your front fans will still come on.
By turning the heater on full blast, you turn the blower on full - which adds quite a bit to the load on the alternator - and therefore your engine. And, if your coolant temp rises enough your front fans will still come on.
...I used to be one of the guys that were obsessed with cranking out extra HP. My first experience with ECU's and the complexity involved with engine tuning was with my Type R which was already difficult since it was mated with a Jackson Racing Supercharger...boy what a headache, so many variables...
Anyways...my point is, many find it silly to be spending hours and retarding this and that to crank out HP.
In todays world, with so many cars vying for the prestige or HP output, performance, etc., a certain website, or mag, will give the nod to a certain car based on that few HP gained. Look at the comparo between headers, etc. The differences between DC or Mugen, Comptech, are almost neglible, so how do you choose.
Well, maybe NORSE can back me up, but that extra HP may be the difference for a drag racer between half a car length or more based on the launch.
And for those tuners, those extra HP is just their hobby. Kind of like those computer nerds that squeeze out every MHZ on their computer when unless you worked at MIT analyzing the wavelengths of fission particle energies, you were never going to use that!!!
I personally am happy with my 270HP!! I got to 220HP at the wheels on my TYPE R before I became a complete wrteched wreck.
Anyways...my point is, many find it silly to be spending hours and retarding this and that to crank out HP.
In todays world, with so many cars vying for the prestige or HP output, performance, etc., a certain website, or mag, will give the nod to a certain car based on that few HP gained. Look at the comparo between headers, etc. The differences between DC or Mugen, Comptech, are almost neglible, so how do you choose.
Well, maybe NORSE can back me up, but that extra HP may be the difference for a drag racer between half a car length or more based on the launch.
And for those tuners, those extra HP is just their hobby. Kind of like those computer nerds that squeeze out every MHZ on their computer when unless you worked at MIT analyzing the wavelengths of fission particle energies, you were never going to use that!!!
I personally am happy with my 270HP!! I got to 220HP at the wheels on my TYPE R before I became a complete wrteched wreck.
good kill..you should've ran circles around him...i guess the 330ci owners around my area a re smarter. they never tried to race me 

...i just hate guys who give you a 'sMUG' look....that guy in the passenger seat probably had an old beater up car and was totally enjoying being in his friends bimmer....


...i just hate guys who give you a 'sMUG' look....that guy in the passenger seat probably had an old beater up car and was totally enjoying being in his friends bimmer....
Thanks!!!
Originally Posted by Zeuser
In "M" or "D" first gear will upshift way before redline. In "L", it'll upshift at or near redline but it won't upshift any further.
So here's what I do: Drop it to "L". Stomp on the gas and keep foot all the way down. When I get near redline it tap the shifter up into "D". The tranny then shifts to 2nd gear. Right after the shift I pull the stick ot the left to the "M" and keep doing the upshifts myself.
I've yet to confirm this with real numbers but it does feel like a faster run to 60MPH than either leaving it in "D" or using "M" only.
So here's what I do: Drop it to "L". Stomp on the gas and keep foot all the way down. When I get near redline it tap the shifter up into "D". The tranny then shifts to 2nd gear. Right after the shift I pull the stick ot the left to the "M" and keep doing the upshifts myself.
I've yet to confirm this with real numbers but it does feel like a faster run to 60MPH than either leaving it in "D" or using "M" only.
Originally Posted by Zeuser
In "M" or "D" first gear will upshift way before redline. In "L", it'll upshift at or near redline but it won't upshift any further.
So here's what I do: Drop it to "L". Stomp on the gas and keep foot all the way down. When I get near redline it tap the shifter up into "D". The tranny then shifts to 2nd gear. Right after the shift I pull the stick ot the left to the "M" and keep doing the upshifts myself.
I've yet to confirm this with real numbers but it does feel like a faster run to 60MPH than either leaving it in "D" or using "M" only.
So here's what I do: Drop it to "L". Stomp on the gas and keep foot all the way down. When I get near redline it tap the shifter up into "D". The tranny then shifts to 2nd gear. Right after the shift I pull the stick ot the left to the "M" and keep doing the upshifts myself.
I've yet to confirm this with real numbers but it does feel like a faster run to 60MPH than either leaving it in "D" or using "M" only.
Maybe maturity comes naturally with age (I suspect I am older than many of you posting here) but these references to "kills" and 80mph racing on public streets really cause me concern. I admit to having "taken the bait" on occasion over the years, but I know that it is a really stupid thing to do. I know what I have and I know what (with equal drivers) I could beat, and generally let it go at that.
Originally Posted by erikmoeser
Maybe maturity comes naturally with age (I suspect I am older than many of you posting here) but these references to "kills" and 80mph racing on public streets really cause me concern. I admit to having "taken the bait" on occasion over the years, but I know that it is a really stupid thing to do. I know what I have and I know what (with equal drivers) I could beat, and generally let it go at that.
Originally Posted by Swat Dude
Call me retired, and this is not meant to be arrogant, but I can't really see the difference in driving my car vs. a police cruiser at 80 mph, or for that matter over 100 mph on the freeway chasing a stolen car. My skill level hasn't changed just because I'm a civilian now.
A policeman driving 80 or 100 on the interstate is more often than not justified in the line of duty. Just because one has the skill to drive that fast or faster doesn't mean drag racing on the public streets is a smart thing to do. The original post talks about needing to stop for the next light. I assume it was in a high density of traffic and population area. If you are the cause of a wreck with serious personal injury you probably will be doing your next race on foot. If you can afford shoes.
Originally Posted by fla-tls
I read your post, but am not quite sure what you were trying to say. Are you saying that driving a police cruiser is like driving an '04 TL, or speed is not an issue to you because of your experience?
Now don't get me wrong, some guy posted a video of a civic driver racing a twin turbo 350Z through traffic on the freeway at what I thought were speeds over 100, weaving in and out and changing lanes dangerously close to other cars...now that is assinine!
Originally Posted by erikmoeser
A policeman driving 80 or 100 on the interstate is more often than not justified in the line of duty. Just because one has the skill to drive that fast or faster doesn't mean drag racing on the public streets is a smart thing to do. The original post talks about needing to stop for the next light. I assume it was in a high density of traffic and population area. If you are the cause of a wreck with serious personal injury you probably will be doing your next race on foot. If you can afford shoes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cycdaniel
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
8
Dec 17, 2019 10:58 AM
TLDude876
Car Talk
134
Dec 28, 2016 03:18 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
Sep 21, 2015 07:51 PM


