The Official 2009 TSX Thread **Unvelied in NY**
#1921
Team Owner
We are all supposing that the 09' model will weigh more. I think so too, but maybe Acura put the new TSX on a lightweight materials diet. If it dropped 150-200 lbs it wouldn't be too bad.
#1923
Team Owner
Originally Posted by tracerit
How about a new thread, or even forum, now that more information is being released about the 2009 TSX?
#1924
I wonder what the new pricing is going to be for the Tech Package. It's getting the ELS sound now... hmmm that's the only cool thing I see. Well the paddle shifters too. Overall not to impressed because we were expecting a lot more, but guaranteed when some guy posts his on the forum when he gets it we will all oogle at it.
#1926
I can't find my garage
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 35
Posts: 4,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
u guys need to calm the f down. you guys are just jumping to conclusion. yes the numbers are down, but who knows, there might be other things that might quite entice you. and i believe, because of its name, rep and such, the sales will Not drop
#1927
Indian Acura Driver
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ottawa, Can
Age: 37
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mltk53
u guys need to calm the f down. you guys are just jumping to conclusion. yes the numbers are down, but who knows, there might be other things that might quite entice you. and i believe, because of its name, rep and such, the sales will Not drop
If you people DON"T remember, Acura already did this before, but everyone seems to have forgotten. And in fact they did it with their hottest seller as well. And guess what, it worked.
The only reason the TSX is set this low is because when the Type S comes out with a better engine, they need to give it a ample horsepower difference. Even 30 horses is ample, but if you gave it 215 to start with and 230 came out of the Type S more fury would come from everyone.
By the way, Acura's TL did it. The Type S had 260 and the 04 TL had 250 (rated at 270, but was cut off since the numbers were wrong).
Now the argument coming after me now is that "this isn't the type S, and they still dropped it", boohoo. You guys are crying over 4 horses? FOUR? And if they only had 4 more, you guys would have made a fuss, no one is ever happy with anything. Calm down. Obviously there's a plan for a better and faster TSX, because Honda KNOWS that a mere 201 won't do the job. BUT, you guys do NOT consist of the majority of TSX buyers. Face it.
Horsepower wars may matter to all of you, but the base TSX will have ample pick up, and will never be driven over 100mph. So why do they need to have a higher horsepower output when majority of TSX drivers won't even go there?
It's so unnecessary, but if they have better torque throughout the RPM range, everyone will like it more. It's a sacrifice for the better.
Than for the horsepower hungry, buy the Type S when it shows up. It'll have i'm sure either a V6 or the Turbo 4...either way, you guys will still complain even when you get the more powerful vehicle.
Lexus did it, i don't care how much the cars are different. But the IS250 is a crazy hot seller because they don't need a 300hp BEAST. 200 is ample in a car this size. The power hungry people go for the 350 which won't even be majority of buyers.
Oh no, for more power, you have to dish out a couple of grand more...well OBVIOUSLY. Otherwise we'd all be driving extremely powerful cars for cheap and it wouldn't make it worth it anymore.
I'm sorry if i've insulted anyone, but calm down. The TL is doing it, the TSX is now doing it. The RSX did it.
As for the V8 it's coming. it's in development and the fact that less than 20% buy the V8, is irrelevant right now, but when the NSX shows up, you'll have your V8.
Yeah it's the flagship, but it does what it should. It has the latest technology, is refined and has ample power.
Honda's only problem at the moment is that it gives ample power, not excess. Which in all honesty, is not a problem. So what, Honda has never been a go fast off the line car, yet you put these cars on the track, and they're keeping up. So you may not like the 200 number, but i'm sure that when they put that thing on a track with the FWD set up, it's going to scare the competition.
Personally, i don't mind 127 hp in my Acura EL, considering the fact that i can OUTCORNER a Lexus IS250. So you tell me, if you want straightline or not. If you only want straight line, you're with the wrong brand. And if you want both, then pay the premium and get a Bimmer.
But the fact that my 80hp less Acura can keep up with a 200hp Lexus in the corners says a lot about the Acura. And personally i think the handling is more important, and the Type S, when they come out, they'll give BMW a run for their money. The SHAWD system is impeccable.
#1930
Originally Posted by datadr
The TSX has always been about style and value,
I completely agree with that statement for the 04-08 TSX.
The 1st Gen TSX is very sexy, I chose the TSX over the TL because of the exterior.
But when the factor of STYLE is not present in the 09 TSX IMO, it completely voids the features it has (not new features cause its already present on the TL/RL).
PS: LED Tailights are a big deal. IMO, they add more aesthetic style to the car.
Now whenever I see a bloated CAMRY or ALTIMA on the road, it reminds me of the 09 TSX.
#1932
Originally Posted by Don Hoagie
And apparently they know you guys pretty well, because everyone here who's claiming they'll leave the brand is talking about going to more expensive vehicles with more power and more status... Lexus IS, BMW 3-Series, Audi A4... in other words, the Acura TL.
You also said something about luxury car buyers always gaining in wealth and therefore always buying a nicer model than the last. It's arrogant to assume that all or most luxury car buyers have a constantly increasing income and/or are jumping at the chance to sink as much money as possible into an asset that rapidly loses value. Assumptions up the yin yang.
#1933
Originally Posted by Brown Chaos
Now the argument coming after me now is that "this isn't the type S, and they still dropped it", boohoo. You guys are crying over 4 horses? FOUR? And if they only had 4 more, you guys would have made a fuss, no one is ever happy with anything. Calm down. Obviously there's a plan for a better and faster TSX, because Honda KNOWS that a mere 201 won't do the job. BUT, you guys do NOT consist of the majority of TSX buyers. Face it.
#1934
It's very strange look at the 201 hp of the next TSX vs the 205 of the current generation.
I don't know any brand on the market that presents new models with LESS power of the models before.
And I'm not merely considering how fast or good the car will be, but the simply "psicological" approach of costumers: when I look at a new model, the FIRST thing I look about is the growth of power and Torque, maybe is stupid but it is!
And for that psycological reason Acura HAD to give the RL 2009 more power of the MDX, maybe 310 hp, nothing more, but people would appreciated it. Because is the top model od the Acura range.
I don't know any brand on the market that presents new models with LESS power of the models before.
And I'm not merely considering how fast or good the car will be, but the simply "psicological" approach of costumers: when I look at a new model, the FIRST thing I look about is the growth of power and Torque, maybe is stupid but it is!
And for that psycological reason Acura HAD to give the RL 2009 more power of the MDX, maybe 310 hp, nothing more, but people would appreciated it. Because is the top model od the Acura range.
#1935
T.DoT P.I.M.P. lol
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Brown Chaos
.................................................. ...........
Personally, i don't mind 127 hp in my Acura EL, considering the fact that i can OUTCORNER a Lexus IS250. So you tell me, if you want straightline or not. If you only want straight line, you're with the wrong brand. And if you want both, then pay the premium and get a Bimmer.
But the fact that my 80hp less Acura can keep up with a 200hp Lexus in the corners says a lot about the Acura. And personally i think the handling is more important, and the Type S, when they come out, they'll give BMW a run for their money. The SHAWD system is impeccable.
Personally, i don't mind 127 hp in my Acura EL, considering the fact that i can OUTCORNER a Lexus IS250. So you tell me, if you want straightline or not. If you only want straight line, you're with the wrong brand. And if you want both, then pay the premium and get a Bimmer.
But the fact that my 80hp less Acura can keep up with a 200hp Lexus in the corners says a lot about the Acura. And personally i think the handling is more important, and the Type S, when they come out, they'll give BMW a run for their money. The SHAWD system is impeccable.
I'm VERY surprise your EL can keep up w/ the IS250 on corners, who's driving it? My buddy's IS250 w/ factory Sport-tuned suspension is very sharp, I have a hard time keeping up w/ him on high-way ramp or track when speed >70mph w/ my TSX; my car started to push (understeer) while he seems like drift thru it like nothing... I have Progress RSB; BuddyClub Racing Spec Damper; Cusco Front Strut and Cusco Lower Arm Brace II, and too much to list. I guess I'm just too slow lol...
BTW: The 2009 TSX seems like alot bigger than ours, the front and rear over-hang is...... If the size is about the same as current Honda Accord (which is bigger than a 300M); I'm going for something else... BMW 135i here I come...
#1936
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Alameda, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zot09
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What a JOKE! They decreased the HP and barely increased the tq, while adding weight. Plus, it's still FWD. HAHAHA why one would buy this over a 128i, I don't know. The only positive I can think of, although it is a big positive, is reliability. But damn, if you're only gonna own your car for ~four years, then why the fuck would you buy this? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A FUCKING JOKE I TELL YOU! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What a JOKE! They decreased the HP and barely increased the tq, while adding weight. Plus, it's still FWD. HAHAHA why one would buy this over a 128i, I don't know. The only positive I can think of, although it is a big positive, is reliability. But damn, if you're only gonna own your car for ~four years, then why the fuck would you buy this? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A FUCKING JOKE I TELL YOU! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
im not happy about the HP either, but i'd still get it over the 128i.
the 128i comes with far less standard features, still will probably cost more, and oh the #1 reason. the 1 series looks horrible.
now if a 328i cost what the 128i does then ok maybe it would be a decision.
#1937
Originally Posted by hans007
im not happy about the HP either, but i'd still get it over the 128i.
the 128i comes with far less standard features, still will probably cost more, and oh the #1 reason. the 1 series looks horrible.
now if a 328i cost what the 128i does then ok maybe it would be a decision.
the 128i comes with far less standard features, still will probably cost more, and oh the #1 reason. the 1 series looks horrible.
now if a 328i cost what the 128i does then ok maybe it would be a decision.
As for the cost, a base 128i is 28k...add sport package, xenons, and nav and you're looking at 33k. Slightly more than what I predict the TSX will be, but the 1-series will be more refined and will have some more pricey technology behind it. Heck, after the initial buying-frenzy for the 1-series dies down, I'm sure you could get it for a pretty decent price. Add in the option of ED, and it would be even cheaper.
#1938
Pro
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Honda where is the SH-AWD + Turbo TSX to compete with the germans + Lexus?
...
You fail Honda.
My next car will not be an Acura judging from NSX delays, RL MMC fiasco and now this.
Acura is now a joke.
...
You fail Honda.
My next car will not be an Acura judging from NSX delays, RL MMC fiasco and now this.
Acura is now a joke.
#1939
Originally Posted by Flounder
Don Hoagie & Datadr got it right on!!!
Excellent posts (1904 &1906) you two.
Excellent posts (1904 &1906) you two.
#1940
日本国内市場の売春婦
I'm tired of givingthe benefit of the doubt to Acura anymore... if they want to keep playing games and enjoy letting the public (as well as the owners) not take them seriously then whatever.. next car will be a german.
#1941
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by cruiserchuck
I know that I am in the minority here, but I am happy that Honda seems to be more concerned with improving gas mileage than increasing horsepower. With premium gas quickly approaching $4 a gallon here, I would rather have better mileage than more horsepower. For those that think the engine is not powerful enough, you should remember that the Euro Accord comes with a 2.0 liter engine standard in most of the world.
#1942
Senior Moderator
I can't believe how easily satisfied and apologetic some people are around here. No doubt its still a good car that will continue to be a strong seller. But the fact remains that besides some added technology all the upgrades are incremental at best. Good enough? for some, of course. But when was the target simply "Good enough"? Lets not forget the fact they had 5 entire years to improve the vehicle. This was the best they could offer? Excuse me if I'm not impressed.
And as for the "improved" MPG.
328 Sedan with 230 HP/ 200 lb-ft gets 19/28
A4 with 200 HP / 207 lb-ft gets 21/30
IS250 with AT gets 21/29
Again, pardon me if I'm gushing with excitement over a 4 banger thats just as good if not slightly better.
Bring on the Type-S.
And as for the "improved" MPG.
328 Sedan with 230 HP/ 200 lb-ft gets 19/28
A4 with 200 HP / 207 lb-ft gets 21/30
IS250 with AT gets 21/29
Again, pardon me if I'm gushing with excitement over a 4 banger thats just as good if not slightly better.
Bring on the Type-S.
#1943
I'll be looking at the Audi A4 2.0T 6-speed w/200HP/207Torque. In addition, the length of A4 is closer to what I seek and not the larger, Accord-camry dimensions the TSX has devolved.
I was really excited about the Sport4 design but the photos and specs have been a huge disappointment after owning 2 Acuras.
I was really excited about the Sport4 design but the photos and specs have been a huge disappointment after owning 2 Acuras.
#1944
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
They need options, though, for those who want more power. Providing options would allow the car to appeal to more potential buyers. I just hope that they redeem themselves by offering a higher power model/Type-S fairly soon after launch. They really should have done it FOR the launch, though, to create excitement for the car.
#1945
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by cruiserchuck
I think Honda views the TL as the option for those who want more power. The cars are almost the same size, and the TL is competitively priced with the IS350, G35, etc.
If they do. its a bad idea IMO. Every other lux make offers a higher end models base engine in the lesser model.
335
A4
C Class
G35
etc...
I don't think we're suggesting the TL's 3.5L or 3.7L engine in the TSX but a much more powerful engine (Turbo, small V6) would be nice.
#1946
Good thing my 2007 is going to be with me until the next redesign. But who knows what is going to happen in 2014. I might get me one of those flying cars.
Whoever made the assumption that anyone who buys a tsx will automatically upgrade to a bigger an more expansive car is an idiot. Unless I make some babies in a couple of years I have no use for a bigger car. I have always liked the small sports sedan, and I always will that is my market.
Now in 7-10 years, I would have stayed or will stay with the TSX if it provides the same advantages it does now. But if Acura does not improve on a model why would i stay with it? or why would I even stay with the brand?
Whoever made the assumption that anyone who buys a tsx will automatically upgrade to a bigger an more expansive car is an idiot. Unless I make some babies in a couple of years I have no use for a bigger car. I have always liked the small sports sedan, and I always will that is my market.
Now in 7-10 years, I would have stayed or will stay with the TSX if it provides the same advantages it does now. But if Acura does not improve on a model why would i stay with it? or why would I even stay with the brand?
#1947
Senior Moderator
After reading the new announcement over at TOV, it seems Colin forced Acura to officially release the 09 TSX info more than month before they wanted to.
Kudo's to Colin for a job well done.
Kudo's to Colin for a job well done.
#1948
Originally Posted by mattlissy
So Glad I purchased my 08 TSX 2.5 weeks ago while I had a good selection of colors. I cant believe The 2009 models HP is 201 down from 205. This is because of the new ULEV (lower emissions rating) Did I also read that the the 2009 no longer has rear wishbone suspenion? And yes, my 08 plays MP3's.
Please forgive my being so descriptive but the 08 playing or not playing mp3s in major for me and my decision. My 2005 Civic Special Edition does play mp3 cds AND displays what song is actually playing. If a 2008 Acura TSX can't do that, I would rather not get the car.
So to be perfectly clear, your car will play a CD that has mp3s on it? Not that you hooked up your ipod or a different mp3 player to the USB port?
Thank you so much for your reply.
#1950
2004 TSX NAV 5AT MSM
Originally Posted by Civic2TSX
Please forgive my being so descriptive but the 08 playing or not playing mp3s in major for me and my decision. My 2005 Civic Special Edition does play mp3 cds AND displays what song is actually playing. If a 2008 Acura TSX can't do that, I would rather not get the car.
So to be perfectly clear, your car will play a CD that has mp3s on it? Not that you hooked up your ipod or a different mp3 player to the USB port?
Thank you so much for your reply.
So to be perfectly clear, your car will play a CD that has mp3s on it? Not that you hooked up your ipod or a different mp3 player to the USB port?
Thank you so much for your reply.
#1951
I spend 2 much time here
Originally Posted by dom
I can't believe how easily satisfied and apologetic some people are around here. No doubt its still a good car that will continue to be a strong seller. But the fact remains that besides some added technology all the upgrades are incremental at best. Good enough? for some, of course. But when was the target simply "Good enough"? Lets not forget the fact they had 5 entire years to improve the vehicle. This was the best they could offer? Excuse me if I'm not impressed.
Again, pardon me if I'm gushing with excitement over a 4 banger thats just as good if not slightly better.
Bring on the Type-S.
Again, pardon me if I'm gushing with excitement over a 4 banger thats just as good if not slightly better.
Bring on the Type-S.
if they don't come out with a type-s version that delivers the goods my next car will not be a tsx.
#1952
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Gabriel, SoCal
Age: 39
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I love the idea of the USB flash drive plug for music. My friend's new 3 series has it and i was like wth?! That ish is crazy! I think a flash memory plug is way more convenient than ipod/mp3 player, because you just have to drag and drop. Maybe someone can make a unit to take video from the usb to put it on the nav screen....
Also, I've been wanting that real time traffic thing. Only loss is the power on the new model.
Also, I've been wanting that real time traffic thing. Only loss is the power on the new model.
#1953
> 100K Mile Club Member
Originally Posted by jiggaman
i tend to agree with you, acura certainly didn't deliver a TSX that has me scrambling to sell my 2004 model for.
if they don't come out with a type-s version that delivers the goods my next car will not be a tsx.
if they don't come out with a type-s version that delivers the goods my next car will not be a tsx.
#1954
Make a hole, coming thru!
apologies for the length, I'm reply to many here in one post
Originally Posted by GeorgeTSX
That sounds like it means you can put mp3's on a USB Flash Drive and plug it in. That would be cool.
Originally Posted by jlukja
You would think, with all the development work being done by aftermarket firms (hondata, comptech, etc.) on the current model TSX, that Acura would be able to adopt at least some of that for the next generation. With the right intake, reflash, header, exhaust, TB gasket, TB spacer the 04-08 edition gets quite a boost in HP. Why can't Acura apply some of that technology to increase the output on the next gen engine beyond 201 hp?
Originally Posted by dom
Ya. I edited the thread title so folks know the specs are out.
The 2nd gen forum is coming, but since the info isn't yet official it should wait.
The 2nd gen forum is coming, but since the info isn't yet official it should wait.
Originally Posted by TommySalami
Don't the 08 TSX's play MP3's?
Originally Posted by mattlissy
... And yes, my 08 plays MP3's.
Originally Posted by TSX69
... A lot of people are predicting doom but the current model sold w/ only ~200 hp/4 cylinder so this might as well. This does nothing for the luxury image tho ... green image maybe.
Originally Posted by Don Hoagie
... 1. All of us current TSX drivers are not the primary demographic for the future TSX. You've all stepped into the "luxury" brand realm, and in that realm, the consumer trend is to upgrade your vehicle whenever possible....
2. ... The TSX is driven primarily by... women. We've had a few threads about the TSX being a chick car - I'm not saying it is, but the fact is that the demographics tell us the majority of TSX drivers are women.
For those of you who never sold cars before, the typical buying trends of each gender are, roughly, as follows (in order of importance):
Men
1. Power
2. Style
3. Amenities
Women
1. Style
2. Value
3. Amenities
In this case, value=good gas mileage, because good gas mileage=less $$ spent on gas. Now obviously Acura could improve horsepower using methods that don't totally destroy the MPG, but the fact is, if any manufacturer has to pick between adding power or maintaining MPG, and their market is both primarily women and gas price conscious, then MPG is where the focus will go. Again, I believe Acura is quite aware of what they're doing here... so just like my previous point, Acura is basically telling you, "this car isn't for you anymore. Move up or move on."
2. ... The TSX is driven primarily by... women. We've had a few threads about the TSX being a chick car - I'm not saying it is, but the fact is that the demographics tell us the majority of TSX drivers are women.
For those of you who never sold cars before, the typical buying trends of each gender are, roughly, as follows (in order of importance):
Men
1. Power
2. Style
3. Amenities
Women
1. Style
2. Value
3. Amenities
In this case, value=good gas mileage, because good gas mileage=less $$ spent on gas. Now obviously Acura could improve horsepower using methods that don't totally destroy the MPG, but the fact is, if any manufacturer has to pick between adding power or maintaining MPG, and their market is both primarily women and gas price conscious, then MPG is where the focus will go. Again, I believe Acura is quite aware of what they're doing here... so just like my previous point, Acura is basically telling you, "this car isn't for you anymore. Move up or move on."
Actually, my criteria in order of importance were: 1. Value, 2. Amenities, 3. Power. Guess that makes me a wierdo. I almost got an Accord V6, but the TSX seemed a better value in the CPO offerings.
All you folks bleating about the about-face from intending to trade up from 2004/2005/whatever to the 2009 model ... boy, I hope you don't build negative equity with this kind of car enthusiasm. I strongly suspect the target buyer is the "first time TSX buyer," who's trading up from something else. It's called their "entry level sedan" for a reason, nudge nudge wink wink. Screaming from the rooftops, "Baaahhh, I'm not getting another TSX, I'm getting a [insert competing brand name here]" says more about your buying strategy than Acura's design and marketing. Frankly, my next car purchase will start at ground zero, as this one did, with reading reviews, ratings, performance tests, and then letting my nose lead me to a sweetheart deal. I've never bought based on "the last one was good, so I'll just plan on the getting the next one." That's a decidely "non-enthusiast" strategy, IMHO. That's the brand-loyal, "My family always bought Plymouth" mentality; I'm surprised so many of you claim to adhere to that, then rant about jumping ship. Watch out for the gunnel on your way over the side, maties.
#1955
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by davidspalding
Are we so sure that that full "printer-friendly" release is official? It's linked to from a much shorter, oblique release. I'm waiting on that 201 HP to be repeated authoritatively.
Read my comments higher up on this page. The release is now official.
#1956
A4 vs TSX size
Originally Posted by freeperjim
I'll be looking at the Audi A4 2.0T 6-speed w/200HP/207Torque. In addition, the length of A4 is closer to what I seek and not the larger, Accord-camry dimensions the TSX has devolved.
#1957
My bolonga has a 1st name
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Age: 39
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
the mod's locked my thread in the TSX forum beacuse it was very generalized to acura, hwoever I really wnated TSX owner's/buyer's opinions
so pleasee check out this thread in cartalk:
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...91#post5811391
so pleasee check out this thread in cartalk:
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...91#post5811391
#1958
Race Director
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97AcuraCL
the mod's locked my thread in the TSX forum beacuse it was very generalized to acura, hwoever I really wnated TSX owner's/buyer's opinions
so pleasee check out this thread in cartalk:
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...91#post5811391
so pleasee check out this thread in cartalk:
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...91#post5811391
#1959
Originally Posted by L1StarTSX
I think we have waited long enough...if lexus can put out two different HP models (250&350) at the same time and then offer the IF later, why cant Acura. Total BS.
#1960
> 100K Mile Club Member
Originally Posted by 97AcuraCL
the mod's locked my thread in the TSX forum beacuse it was very generalized to acura, hwoever I really wnated TSX owner's/buyer's opinions
so pleasee check out this thread in cartalk:
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...91#post5811391
so pleasee check out this thread in cartalk:
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...91#post5811391