K23a1 Build
12-14-2015, 02:35 PM
#1086
12-14-2015, 08:42 PM
#1091
Drifting
Thread Starter
12-14-2015, 08:56 PM
#1093
Drifting
Thread Starter
12-14-2015, 09:03 PM
#1095
Drifting
Thread Starter
The following users liked this post:
KenB350z (12-14-2015)
12-15-2015, 07:26 AM
#1099
Intermediate
You didn't adjust the actuator preload on the gate, or swap the actuator? The EFR can be manually controlled pretty easily with a 10mm wrench.
At 8psi, the OEM boost control solenoid shouldn't even be near hitting a maximum target, unless the wastegate actuator itself is adjusted so loose that it makes 2-3psi on gate pressure.
Don't bother with the supercharger, just turn the boost up! Keep it simple.
At 8psi, the OEM boost control solenoid shouldn't even be near hitting a maximum target, unless the wastegate actuator itself is adjusted so loose that it makes 2-3psi on gate pressure.
Don't bother with the supercharger, just turn the boost up! Keep it simple.
12-15-2015, 10:38 AM
#1100
Drifting
Thread Starter
You didn't adjust the actuator preload on the gate, or swap the actuator? The EFR can be manually controlled pretty easily with a 10mm wrench.
At 8psi, the OEM boost control solenoid shouldn't even be near hitting a maximum target, unless the wastegate actuator itself is adjusted so loose that it makes 2-3psi on gate pressure.
Don't bother with the supercharger, just turn the boost up! Keep it simple.
At 8psi, the OEM boost control solenoid shouldn't even be near hitting a maximum target, unless the wastegate actuator itself is adjusted so loose that it makes 2-3psi on gate pressure.
Don't bother with the supercharger, just turn the boost up! Keep it simple.
12-15-2015, 10:44 AM
#1101
Intermediate
How 'bout you send me the current calibration on your car along with a datalog, and I get to the bottom of whatever is ailing you from making a bunch of power?
12-15-2015, 04:15 PM
#1102
Drifting
Thread Starter
12-15-2015, 06:54 PM
#1106
12-15-2015, 07:00 PM
#1107
Drifting
Thread Starter
12-17-2015, 07:29 PM
#1110
Drifting
Thread Starter
12-24-2015, 01:43 PM
#1113
Speaking of which. Those jukes have a neat awd system similar to shawd, they can send 100% of rear power to one rear wheel, however they can't send more than 50% back there like we can. Also a turbo 1.6, I was stongly considering one, I actually don't hate the styling. But the cvt killed it for me.
12-24-2015, 08:50 PM
#1114
Drifting
Thread Starter
Speaking of which. Those jukes have a neat awd system similar to shawd, they can send 100% of rear power to one rear wheel, however they can't send more than 50% back there like we can. Also a turbo 1.6, I was stongly considering one, I actually don't hate the styling. But the cvt killed it for me.
12-25-2015, 04:17 AM
#1115
Oh god, the things I would do in a juke R. Just so much beautiful 3.8TT goodness! Sadly, we got nearly half the displacement, 2/3 the cylinders, half the turbos and +200 pounds.....and you ask why I am bitter haha
12-28-2015, 03:23 AM
#1117
I like the way you think! I just really don't think a honda transmission could handle anything more than mild abuse. But seriously though, would be so sick if honda was ballsy enough to just mess around with a twin turbo mdx and rdx. Like nissan was ballsy and put the gtr engine into the juke, these kind of over the top things put car makers on the map. No chance the puny rdx axles could handle the abuse, especially the thin crappy rear axles. I even doubt the mdx diff could hold.
12-28-2015, 09:52 AM
#1118
keep in mind the stock engine is rated at 265 tq at the crank and im putting down 370+ to the ground... so keep in mind that mine is still living and if we do the math
to the wheels x drive line loss correction of 20% = est crank TQ
370 x 1.20 =444 TQ
at the crank which is VERY conservative.
keep in mind its not hp that kills stuff its TQ
to the wheels x drive line loss correction of 20% = est crank TQ
370 x 1.20 =444 TQ
at the crank which is VERY conservative.
keep in mind its not hp that kills stuff its TQ
12-29-2015, 02:10 PM
#1120
Drifting
Thread Starter