Integra Type S Spy Shots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6p3FZwlJ4k
Three exhaust tips gives me hope that this is the CTR version of the K20 and not the TLX/RDX/Accord version.
Three exhaust tips gives me hope that this is the CTR version of the K20 and not the TLX/RDX/Accord version.
Interested in when and price. My Tail of the Dragon car is a 2013 Miata with the PRHT which I love, but with the proliferation of SUVs, each year it starts to feel smaller and smaller.
Last edited by Chargersix; Sep 25, 2022 at 04:46 PM.
Similar issue with my TSX. I am now dwarfed when parking and at red lights and it's getting frustrating to hardly ever be able to see around things.
https://www.topspeed.com/cars/the-20...at-fans-think/
Ok. I am tired of posts like the one above saying that the new Acura Integra S should not be based on the Civic Type R, and how Honda is not listening to is fans....
1st - I am just happy to see that a Type S will be coming, especially seeing the move to electric vehicles seems to be the way Acura will be going next. Why in the world would Honda make an Integra Type R with less features and more raw amenities when there is a Honda Civic Type R? Acura is the higher luxury brand and no longer carries a Type R, this is why the Type S exists. Just for nostalgia and to offer it with a hatch back??? Sorry that makes poor business sense.
2nd - The Civic Type R is a widely coveted vehicle with a huge fan base/following. I am glad to see that the new Type S will be similar to it. I really like the new 2023 Civic Type R, however it is extremely hard to get a hold of as the numbers are extremely limited, and is too harsh of a vehicle for a daily driver for someone like me. I have kids and can only have one vehicle. The extra refinement, slightly softer touches, and 5 seats will be a welcome approach for me.
3rd - Just what the heck kind of powerplant do you think they would put in an Integra Type S? Of course it would be the 2 liter turbo engine. Instead Honda could have muted it down some, similar to the RDX or Accord just not to steal sales away from the Civic Type R, thankfully this is not the case. Yes it will not likely be an AWD version, but I don't actually care that much (and my previous vehicle was a modded manual 2015 Audi S4). The Civic Type R (previous gen and current) are awesome handling FWD vehicles - I will just pick up a decent set of winter tread and be happy with it, enjoying the fuel economy savings of not having an AWD platform. Don't get me wrong Honda's AWD is awesome and I would gladly take it, but I'm not gonna whine about it.
I do suspect there could be an automatic (likely a dual clutch) version of the Integra Type S, sadly for those that can not appreciate a true stick/manual experience. Obviously that will not be my choice of transmission, but Acura may do this to gain more sales on the Type S Teg.
Ok. I am tired of posts like the one above saying that the new Acura Integra S should not be based on the Civic Type R, and how Honda is not listening to is fans....
1st - I am just happy to see that a Type S will be coming, especially seeing the move to electric vehicles seems to be the way Acura will be going next. Why in the world would Honda make an Integra Type R with less features and more raw amenities when there is a Honda Civic Type R? Acura is the higher luxury brand and no longer carries a Type R, this is why the Type S exists. Just for nostalgia and to offer it with a hatch back??? Sorry that makes poor business sense.
2nd - The Civic Type R is a widely coveted vehicle with a huge fan base/following. I am glad to see that the new Type S will be similar to it. I really like the new 2023 Civic Type R, however it is extremely hard to get a hold of as the numbers are extremely limited, and is too harsh of a vehicle for a daily driver for someone like me. I have kids and can only have one vehicle. The extra refinement, slightly softer touches, and 5 seats will be a welcome approach for me.
3rd - Just what the heck kind of powerplant do you think they would put in an Integra Type S? Of course it would be the 2 liter turbo engine. Instead Honda could have muted it down some, similar to the RDX or Accord just not to steal sales away from the Civic Type R, thankfully this is not the case. Yes it will not likely be an AWD version, but I don't actually care that much (and my previous vehicle was a modded manual 2015 Audi S4). The Civic Type R (previous gen and current) are awesome handling FWD vehicles - I will just pick up a decent set of winter tread and be happy with it, enjoying the fuel economy savings of not having an AWD platform. Don't get me wrong Honda's AWD is awesome and I would gladly take it, but I'm not gonna whine about it.
I do suspect there could be an automatic (likely a dual clutch) version of the Integra Type S, sadly for those that can not appreciate a true stick/manual experience. Obviously that will not be my choice of transmission, but Acura may do this to gain more sales on the Type S Teg.
Trending Topics
This could get me to trade my TL. Interested to hear more details, including price.
We love our new Integra A Spec 6MT. With 50% more HP? Should be a great driving car, assuming they get the suspension tuning dialed. I suspect it will be a bit softer than the CTR, which would suit me fine for a DD.
We love our new Integra A Spec 6MT. With 50% more HP? Should be a great driving car, assuming they get the suspension tuning dialed. I suspect it will be a bit softer than the CTR, which would suit me fine for a DD.
This could get me to trade my TL. Interested to hear more details, including price.
We love our new Integra A Spec 6MT. With 50% more HP? Should be a great driving car, assuming they get the suspension tuning dialed. I suspect it will be a bit softer than the CTR, which would suit me fine for a DD.
We love our new Integra A Spec 6MT. With 50% more HP? Should be a great driving car, assuming they get the suspension tuning dialed. I suspect it will be a bit softer than the CTR, which would suit me fine for a DD.
Summer 2023 would be about 1 year after the regular model, which is about right for a high-performance model.
This could get me to trade my TL. Interested to hear more details, including price.
We love our new Integra A Spec 6MT. With 50% more HP? Should be a great driving car, assuming they get the suspension tuning dialed. I suspect it will be a bit softer than the CTR, which would suit me fine for a DD.
We love our new Integra A Spec 6MT. With 50% more HP? Should be a great driving car, assuming they get the suspension tuning dialed. I suspect it will be a bit softer than the CTR, which would suit me fine for a DD.
The ITS just makes the Acura lineup so much more interesting!
MDX/TYPE S
RDX
TLX/TYPE S
Integra/TYPE S
ZDX/TYPE S
Finally! Acura is making some big decisions and heading the right direction.
Wishlist:
Smaller SUV than RDX - CDX/HRV size
RDX - TYPE S
Of course, the next gen NSX - Fully Electric
Acura needs to make money off of fools like me who buy the regular car only to sell it and buy the Type S a year later when it comes out
The ITS just makes the Acura lineup so much more interesting!
MDX/TYPE S
RDX
TLX/TYPE S
Integra/TYPE S
ZDX/TYPE S
Finally! Acura is making some big decisions and heading the right direction.
Wishlist:
Smaller SUV than RDX - CDX/HRV size
RDX - TYPE S
Of course, the next gen NSX - Fully Electric
MDX/TYPE S
RDX
TLX/TYPE S
Integra/TYPE S
ZDX/TYPE S
Finally! Acura is making some big decisions and heading the right direction.
Wishlist:
Smaller SUV than RDX - CDX/HRV size
RDX - TYPE S
Of course, the next gen NSX - Fully Electric
For the other cars you mentioned, RDX-S is confirmed to be arriving for the next-gen. 2024 maybe?
I have been following GM's Utium products closely, and ZDX is based on Lyriq and Type-S is based on the sports version with around 500hp. I have no doubt it will drive great - the question mark is how extensive Acura will rework the interior.
The small SUV if exists, I assume executives in dealerships should know by now. There is a product gap in the 2nd half of 2023 before ZDX, would this be the launch window for the small SUV?
Also, I saw some talks about ITS not having SH-AWD. IMHO, this is a blessing in disguise. I have seen first hand as an owner the progression of SH-AWD from the 2nd gen system to the 4th gen. The latest version has much quicker response compared to the older ones, but SH-AWD can be bad in terms of driver feedback at the limit because it takes away the human-machine connection that is the hallmark of 90-00 Honda/Acura. It has its own brain, and when you are at the grip limit, SH-AWD can be the one driving the car instead of the driver. Integra should have a little pureness, even the modern day muted version would be better than computerized feedback.
I am not as enthusiastic about the Acura lineup even though I cheer for Acura in my heart. Type-S are nice, but only nice so far. I hope ITS will break the mold and take Type-S to the great level. It has to because it should be the most organic yet sporty car in the Acura lineup.
For the other cars you mentioned, RDX-S is confirmed to be arriving for the next-gen. 2024 maybe?
I have been following GM's Utium products closely, and ZDX is based on Lyriq and Type-S is based on the sports version with around 500hp. I have no doubt it will drive great - the question mark is how extensive Acura will rework the interior.
The small SUV if exists, I assume executives in dealerships should know by now. There is a product gap in the 2nd half of 2023 before ZDX, would this be the launch window for the small SUV?
For the other cars you mentioned, RDX-S is confirmed to be arriving for the next-gen. 2024 maybe?
I have been following GM's Utium products closely, and ZDX is based on Lyriq and Type-S is based on the sports version with around 500hp. I have no doubt it will drive great - the question mark is how extensive Acura will rework the interior.
The small SUV if exists, I assume executives in dealerships should know by now. There is a product gap in the 2nd half of 2023 before ZDX, would this be the launch window for the small SUV?
I'm bullish on the ITS because unlike other Acura products, the Integra is (for better or for worse, but mostly better) really a reskinned existing Honda product. There's no secret that I hold a fair amount of contempt for Acura designers and product planners, but I very much appreciate and respect those on the Honda side of the business. People criticize the Integra for being based on the Civic, but given what we've seen with the TLX I for one am glad they didn't try to reinvent the wheel and waste money building it on a bespoke platform and throwing away all the Honda goodness.
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I also agree - while sh awd is great, it also has its drawbacks like the one mentioned, plus the added weight of about 300lb. That 300lb is always there when you are cornering, braking, and accelerating. It also hurts fuel economy. And like it or not, sh awd only works when you are on the gas.
Given how highly praised the ctr is, I'm perfectly fine the ITS is based in that car.
Given how highly praised the ctr is, I'm perfectly fine the ITS is based in that car.
I'm a big fan of (and believer in) SH-AWD. It is still a thrilling experience on my '10 TL. But I have to agree regarding the new ITS that I don't think it's necessary, and actually would be detrimental given the packaging limitations, weight and MPG penalty and the already high-capability of the underlying CTR chassis. If the ITS is remotely close to the CTR in its handling prowess, it will be all most of us could realistically hope for in a street-oriented car.
Agree. Love the SH-AWD on our 2019 TLX, but the ITS is a different animal. I would not buy one to replace our TLX, but I will consider it to replace my Miata. Something for taking a trip to western NC or eastern TN for roads like the Tail of the Dragon. Having taken both the Miata and TLX there, the TLX is a tad too large and the response and feedback isn’t what I prefer on those type roads. Even though I am retired, I am sure the ITS would make a much better daily than the Miata.
What I'm most surprised about is that Motortrend mentioned the car had very little wind or road noise. As I'm sure you already realized, I don't think Acura added any additional sound deadening to the Integra, since at speed there's quite a bit of road noise and wind noise is nothing to write home about. I suspect it's because they couldn't afford to make the car any heavier due to the relatively low power output, but the Type S has a much beefier motor and as such they can pack on a few more pounds in the interest of reducing noise.
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Honestly this will be one of the best Acura four door cars. Peak Acura had the 3G TL with 258hp, 6MT, LSD, and 3400lb curb weight. There's also the Type S with 286hp.
This ITS will be similarly sized with lsd and 6mt but with 300+ hp and some 300lb lighter.
The K20C1 also has good aftermarket support. Reaching 400whp reliably doesn't take much.
This ITS will be similarly sized with lsd and 6mt but with 300+ hp and some 300lb lighter.
The K20C1 also has good aftermarket support. Reaching 400whp reliably doesn't take much.
Honestly this will be one of the best Acura four door cars. Peak Acura had the 3G TL with 258hp, 6MT, LSD, and 3400lb curb weight. There's also the Type S with 286hp.
This ITS will be similarly sized with lsd and 6mt but with 300+ hp and some 300lb lighter.
The K20C1 also has good aftermarket support. Reaching 400whp reliably doesn't take much.
This ITS will be similarly sized with lsd and 6mt but with 300+ hp and some 300lb lighter.
The K20C1 also has good aftermarket support. Reaching 400whp reliably doesn't take much.
If all they did was drop the K20C1 and beefed up 6MT into the existing Integra, it would be trounce the S3 in terms of handling and fun-to-drive. Yeah it's not going to be as fast in a straight line on account of the manual and FWD, but I would be shocked if it wasn't faster around a track and much more engaging to drive. The S3 is a nice car, but it's not even as engaging as the Golf R, which itself isn't a particularly engaging car to drive either.
Also, I saw some talks about ITS not having SH-AWD. IMHO, this is a blessing in disguise. I have seen first hand as an owner the progression of SH-AWD from the 2nd gen system to the 4th gen. The latest version has much quicker response compared to the older ones, but SH-AWD can be bad in terms of driver feedback at the limit because it takes away the human-machine connection that is the hallmark of 90-00 Honda/Acura. It has its own brain, and when you are at the grip limit, SH-AWD can be the one driving the car instead of the driver. Integra should have a little pureness, even the modern day muted version would be better than computerized feedback.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RDXMac
2G RDX (2013-2018)
2
Oct 13, 2016 07:12 PM













