When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's definitely not cheap...but if you're willing to make the investment, go for it.
I sold all of my Canon gear, went on hiatus for about a year, and found myself back in the mirrorless realm with my Sony A7. Don't see myself going back anytime soon. But finding it pretty darn expensive.
I would look at used if the savings were right and the gear was mint. Where does one buy used gear? I did a little searching last night about those zoom lenses. Looks like you can buy that Canon F/4 IS for $970 refurb through Canon. I would rather buy a new one for $1150 I think..
I hear used 6D bodies are pretty affordable these days. You can just use your lenses in crop mode for now, maybe later look into tilt shift lenses. I highly recommend them for architectural photography
I hear used 6D bodies are pretty affordable these days. You can just use your lenses in crop mode for now, maybe later look into tilt shift lenses. I highly recommend them for architectural photography
Unfortunately for canon, there's no crop mode. Can't use EF-S lenses with an EF mount.
Only EF lenses with EF-S mount.
6D is definitely come down a lot in price thou. I've seen them for 850 used
I would look at used if the savings were right and the gear was mint. Where does one buy used gear? I did a little searching last night about those zoom lenses. Looks like you can buy that Canon F/4 IS for $970 refurb through Canon. I would rather buy a new one for $1150 I think..
I have used fredmiranda.com and many years ago photography-on-the.net to buy and sell used gear. Just buy from established members.
But buying new vs used and prices...
Example...Nikon gives five year warranties with their lens...so if a used lens is close to new price...I'd go with new.
I've seen pictures of A7 wearing Canon flashes. Will my 600EX mount right up? And what would a body like that feel like in hand with the 10-22 and flash mounted? My canon body still feels pretty balanced but I know the A7 is a bit smaller.
I'm taking listing photos for 24 agents now, as well as marketing shots for different new-home neighborhood projects we have. I take a lot of interior photos. I've had an EF-S 10-22mm I've been using for ~ 8 years now. I also need to be able to capture views with a zoom lens, which is what I use the 55-250 EFS for. And I use them both for scenery for fun like what I have been posting lately.
Is the 10-22 considered consumer grade? Does it need to be serviced or retired at some point?
The nice thing about doing photography "professionally" is I can write off everything I buy.
very nice - my answer would have been more like Jeff's direction if I had known you were doing this at this level.
I've seen pictures of A7 wearing Canon flashes. Will my 600EX mount right up? And what would a body like that feel like in hand with the 10-22 and flash mounted? My canon body still feels pretty balanced but I know the A7 is a bit smaller.
In theory it should work, as long as the camera has the 2 pins in the hotshoe it should fire. But you won't have the features such as TTL. As forth the balance, the lens is a Lil bit lighter than the A7, it should be stable. But in the end, you wouldn't know unless you actually mount it.
I got a replacement bulb for my 430EX. I need an adapter/mount so I can attach it to a tripod. Any suggestions for those parts? I want to be able to incorporate an umbrella into the mix. This will be lighting in addition to my camera mounted 600EX, or maybe I will run the 430 on camera and 600 on the tripod depending on the situation..
I got a replacement bulb for my 430EX. I need an adapter/mount so I can attach it to a tripod. Any suggestions for those parts? I want to be able to incorporate an umbrella into the mix. This will be lighting in addition to my camera mounted 600EX, or maybe I will run the 430 on camera and 600 on the tripod depending on the situation..
do you have this stand doohicky that comes with the flash? it's got a tripod mount on the bottom.
I'm thinking the umbrella will help for when I have to bounce my flash towards a red wall or any other troublesome color, that tends to cast the whole room that color. Does that sound right? This secondary light source is going to be all new to me.
I'm thinking the umbrella will help for when I have to bounce my flash towards a red wall or any other troublesome color, that tends to cast the whole room that color. Does that sound right? This secondary light source is going to be all new to me.
I am no lighting expert, but if you hit a red wall with light from ANY source it is going to cast a red color onto anything it reflects upon. Doesn't matter if you bounce, shoot through an umbrella, etc... You could gel the light source to compensate, or tone down the red channel in post, or simply set a custom white balance in camera prior to the final shot. The last may be the simplest solution, just get ahold of a 18% grey card, make a test shot and set the WB accordingly. Remember to set it back to normal when done with the difficult shot, though.
Others with more experience may have better suggestions.
99% of the time I'm bouncing the flash behind me, usually at a 45* angle up to the ceiling/wall. This may not be the way umbrellas work but I thought you could bounce into a white umbrella which would reflect the light back at my scene, so I would be bouncing into white instead of the dreaded "red wall".
99% of the time I'm bouncing the flash behind me, usually at a 45* angle up to the ceiling/wall. This may not be the way umbrellas work but I thought you could bounce into a white umbrella which would reflect the light back at my scene, so I would be bouncing into white instead of the dreaded "red wall".
Sure, your active light source will be directing white light toward the room and the red wall. As soon as your white light hits the red wall, you will get red reflected light, no?
I might be completely off here, just seems more a matter of physics than photography.
I am no lighting expert, but if you hit a red wall with light from ANY source it is going to cast a red color onto anything it reflects upon. Doesn't matter if you bounce, shoot through an umbrella, etc... You could gel the light source to compensate, or tone down the red channel in post, or simply set a custom white balance in camera prior to the final shot. The last may be the simplest solution, just get ahold of a 18% grey card, make a test shot and set the WB accordingly. Remember to set it back to normal when done with the difficult shot, though.
Others with more experience may have better suggestions.
Originally Posted by mattg
99% of the time I'm bouncing the flash behind me, usually at a 45* angle up to the ceiling/wall. This may not be the way umbrellas work but I thought you could bounce into a white umbrella which would reflect the light back at my scene, so I would be bouncing into white instead of the dreaded "red wall".
hmmm well as long as the umbrella is black and not leaking any light behind it, you should technically be fine regardless of the wall color. But you really gotta try it out in person to make a final analysis. It should work, in theory.
Are you going to be doing multiple shots with the umbrella at various locations to get even lighting? That would be a cool looking shot, I mean envisioning it in my head.
I would like to learn how to stitch or layer together shots in PS for more challenging rooms/scenarios. Like in a room with high ceilings and tall windows, to obtain a proper exposure of the interior and the view. I've gotten better about making it work by using available light to my advantage (golden hour or dusk), boosting up my on camera flash and using LR. The secondary light source should allow me to create more even light, and more light in general, which will allow me to use faster shutter speeds and have less blown out windows, and less -100 highlight adjustments.
I would like to learn how to stitch or layer together shots in PS for more challenging rooms/scenarios. Like in a room with high ceilings and tall windows, to obtain a proper exposure of the interior and the view. I've gotten better about making it work by using available light to my advantage (golden hour or dusk), boosting up my on camera flash and using LR. The secondary light source should allow me to create more even light, and more light in general, which will allow me to use faster shutter speeds and have less blown out windows, and less -100 highlight adjustments.
It's not too difficult to do, all you do is place the umbrella to light up a specific area of the shot, take the shot, and repeat for the other areas, then go into Photoshop and put all those images into one as layers, and then selectively erase parts (or via other methods) to show the highlights mixed with the original light. Try it out some time when you have the time and energy. Warning I've heard once you go that route it's very difficult to not do it that way.
Here are some challenging scenarios for me. These first 2 are from a couple years ago. High ceilings, red walls, kind of a nightmare to light this room and not end up blowing the windows out. In this shot I'm not bouncing against red.
In this one I am bouncing against red wall and white ceiling. You can see some of the white paint has a pink hue, and that's after I toned that way down in LR.
These are from this year. I like to think I'm a bit better now.. Dark colors, dark wood, dark funiture = kind of a muddy monotone. This really looked like crap before LR.
This is all hand held, camera mounted flash. I want to continue to improve and have the skills to take on a challenging room and a million dollar house (which I have figured out how to fumble through for the most part). But for the bulk of what I do it needs to go down quick. If it's a 2000 sq. ft. home for $500,000, I need to be able to shoot the thing in 30 minutes..
If you're looking to do quick work, I would advise against that whole layers thing haha - you can easily spend 1-2 hours on ONE image if you are doing layers.
If you are looking for throughput and efficiency I would not advise on layers. That would be more for like one or two signature shots that you want to nail down fine tune and tweak.
Umbrella might be able to help you in certain spots but again for quick work that's gonna be something you'll have to fine tune.
11-03-2015, 12:16 PM
2922 Flagstone 6 by Matt Garner, on Flickr
2922 Flagstone 11 by Matt Garner, on Flickr
IMG_8700 by Matt Garner, on Flickr
IMG_8710 by Matt Garner, on Flickr
IMG_8735 by Matt Garner, on Flickr
IMG_8739 by Matt Garner, on Flickr
IMG_8764 by Matt Garner, on Flickr
IMG_8766 by Matt Garner, on Flickr