Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

C&P Random Thread -

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-01-2012 | 01:22 AM
  #5161  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,349
Likes: 2,827
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
the rumored 46 megapixel camera from Canon?

runors say it might not even be called a "D" camera.
Old 10-01-2012 | 01:24 AM
  #5162  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
yeah that. depending on its IQ and performance, I would not mind grabbing one. even though I have absolutely no use for 46mp files haha.
Old 10-01-2012 | 01:25 AM
  #5163  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
I posted about the 3d on the rumor thread. nobody looked.
Old 10-01-2012 | 01:26 AM
  #5164  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
what the what
what the whatty what what


/end.
Old 10-01-2012 | 01:26 AM
  #5165  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
oh woops... buddy. heading there now.
Old 10-01-2012 | 01:42 AM
  #5166  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,519
Likes: 3,073
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by asianspec
I posted about the 3d on the rumor thread. nobody looked.
did someone say "3D"?

Old 10-01-2012 | 01:45 AM
  #5167  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Undying Dreams
I'm really excited for it. Why would you sell it if you loved it so much?!
as said, I sold it to get the 24-70 2.8 - and I would guess that comparatively speaking overall the 24-70 is a better lens for the type of work I was doing (low-light) - but I could have continued with the 24-105 if I wanted. The things I missed the most was its compact size, light weight, IS, and extra reach.
The following users liked this post:
Undying Dreams (10-02-2012)
Old 10-01-2012 | 01:52 AM
  #5168  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
oh woops... buddy. heading there now.



Ok I'm done. Lol
Old 10-01-2012 | 02:21 PM
  #5169  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by is300eater
did someone say "3D"?

I highly doubt it will be called that.
Old 10-04-2012 | 06:54 PM
  #5170  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,519
Likes: 3,073
From: Vancouver BC
I'm not sure if it's my internet or what but uploading photos to Flickr seems to be longer than usual lately, anyone else notice this?
Old 10-04-2012 | 10:12 PM
  #5171  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
this is what I've been eyeing - one of my friends who has Elinchrom Rangers and other assorted high-end studio lighting recommends this every chance he gets - he has a few of these - they are great portable lighting solution and great price for what you get.

http://www.calumetphoto.com/eng/prod...system/cf0506k
Hey its back in stock. temped now
Old 10-07-2012 | 10:08 AM
  #5172  
pttl's Avatar
My first Avatar....
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 7,108
From: NJ
How do any of you guys feel about variable neutral density filters as compared to the fixed ones?

Any suggestions on either?
Old 10-08-2012 | 05:50 PM
  #5173  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
http://notastarvingartist.com/post/1...a-photographer
50 Reasons not to Date a Photographer
  1. They rather hold their bulky camera, than hold hands with you.
  2. On a romantic date, you’ll watch the sun go down and think “Wow this is gorgeous” and they’ll go “mirror lock, tripod, and stop down f/8 at 1/125.”
  3. You’ll never be able to enjoy tv, movies, or magazines because they’ll point out all the visual flaws.
  4. They like to sit in obscure coffee shop and voyeuristically watch people for great lengths of time.
  5. If you’re taking a walk outside and you come across some “interesting light” they will make you sit/stand/pose in public so that they can take a photo.
  6. You’ll never get to enjoy freshly cooked meals because they’ll spend 15 minutes taking 20 variations of the same dish with their iPhone.
  7. They get angry when your friends go up to them and say “I am interested in photography, can you recommend a good camera for me? Nothing professional I just want to take pretty pictures.”
  8. You’ll wait longer for them to finish analyzing art in a museum than you’ll wait at the dmv
  9. Same goes with old used bookstores.
  10. When you think they’re giving you their undivided attention, they’re really wondering how they could fix you with a little Clone Tool and Patch Tool.
  11. Or they are actually using you to not look so creepy as they people watch everything going on around you.
  12. They rather drop $1,000+ on new glass than a purse for you.
  13. You can’t take a photo with them without taking at least five more.
  14. If you ask them if you look fat, they’ll say “don’t worry I can photoshop you later.”
  15. They’ll never photoshop something simple for you if the content is not up to their “standards.”
  16. That photo they randomly took of you yesterday? Good luck getting them to send it to you.
  17. They spend all their time on the computer (and not for porn.)
  18. They can’t have a normal conversation without throwing acronyms and random numbers in.
  19. They still use film cameras.
  20. They spend a lot of time with people cooler than you i.e. models, actors, musicians, successful rich people.
  21. They’ll be fussy over the position of a common household object, like a coffee cup.
  22. They won’t return your calls or text messages, but you can bet they’re still posting pics on Instagram.
  23. They like watching old films that you’ve never heard or will ever understand.
  24. They like looking at weird things in general.
  25. Instead of having penis-envy, they have camera-gear-envy.
  26. If there’s a natural disaster in a far away land, they’re already on a plane going over there.
  27. Everything is watermarked.
  28. They think everyone else’s photos suck.
  29. They want to color correct a lot of scenes from Twilight and Jersey Shore.
  30. They hate rainbows, especially ones spinning in a circle.
  31. Whenever you’re in a group talking and the conversation goes deep, they’re taking notes in some form of Moleskine.
  32. They use over priced Moleskine notebooks.
  33. They like trespassing into old abandoned buildings filled with health hazards.
  34. They always want to show a new photo they took, but don’t really care if you like it or not.
  35. They hate your n00bie friend’s new artsy profile picture.
  36. Bright, sunny days make them sad, but cloudy, overcast days are apparently great!
  37. They’ll take you into places that have “culture” as well a high chance of getting mugged.
  38. Your birthday present will be a portrait that they’ve taken of you.
  39. You can’t go anywhere new without them stopping to take a photo of everything and anything.
  40. They will always bug you to be a test subject.
  41. Nothing can ever be naturally pretty, everything must be fixed in Photoshop.
  42. Bringing their camera means, bringing 50lbs of equipment.
  43. If you break any of their things on accident, you’ll owe them thousands of dollars.
  44. You can’t get them a birthday/Christmas present without spending at least $500
  45. They are natural hoarders, collecting and keeping piles of old newspapers, packaging, magazines, and other things that “inspire” them.
  46. They are weird and geeky.
  47. They have hard drives of photos, but probably have printed 10 images.
  48. They are always secretly judging your creativity.
  49. If you’re ever in auto mode, they laugh at you.
  50. They orgasm every time they learn a new lighting technique.
Old 10-08-2012 | 10:40 PM
  #5174  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
That's definitely not us
Old 10-09-2012 | 09:24 AM
  #5175  
Undying Dreams's Avatar
Race Director
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 18,278
Likes: 3,824
From: South Florida
This makes us all sound like hipsters
Old 10-09-2012 | 01:20 PM
  #5176  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by Undying Dreams
This makes us all sound like hipsters
nerds for a better choice of words.
Old 10-09-2012 | 01:22 PM
  #5177  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
I ain't no hipster.

nerd, geek,
Old 10-09-2012 | 01:24 PM
  #5178  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Hey Dave, have you seen this yet? damn brits.

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/09/...-the-bbc-test/

Last week, we wrote that Nikon was tooting its own horn by claiming that both the D4 and D800 DSLRs had passed the European Broadcasting Union test, popularly known as the BBC test, making them the “first DSLR cameras fit for broadcast.” Now it appears that the horns were tooted prematurely, as the BBC is refuting Nikon’s interpretation of the tests.

Here’s how the original news article appeared on the Australian My Nikon Life website:

BBC Contradicts Nikons Claim That Its DSLRs Passed the BBC Test original

In our writeup, we reported that there seemed to be some confusion over what constituted “passing” the test, since the results don’t include a simple rating or pass/fail indication. More specifically, the D800′s results also had the harsh conclusion, “This camera cannot be recommended for serious programme-making,” suggesting that it failed, rather than passed, the test.

Shortly afterward, the original post was deleted from the Nikon website, and replaced with a new article that only claims that the D4 passed:

BBC Contradicts Nikons Claim That Its DSLRs Passed the BBC Test revised

Nikon might need to make a second revision, as now the BBC is saying that neither camera passed the test.

Andy Quested, the broadcasting company’s Head of Technology, has responded to Nikon’s claim in an email to The Phoblographer and in a comment on our post, saying,
The cameras did not “pass” and the BBC is not and will not be using them for HD programmes.

Here are the sections from the test report

D4

[...] However, even though the sensor has 16.8 million photo-sites, it achieves only about 1,355×764, only a little better than 1,280×720 [...]

800

[...] Video performance is not really acceptable at 1080p, much less so at 720p. Even though the sensor has 36.8 million photo-sites, it achieves only about 1,355×764, little better than 1,280×720 [...]
Nikon’s latest DSLRs are certainly drawing rave reviews for the performance of their sensors, but it seems the company — or, at least the Australian division’s PR agency — got ahead of itself with this latest “fit for broadcasting” claim.
Read more at http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/09/...KZm7wxOLPbj.99

*starting to put on flame-retardant gear*
Old 10-09-2012 | 02:52 PM
  #5179  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
I hear 5Dc's are going for around $500-600 now... that is a pretty nice deal for a sweet FF camera.
Old 10-09-2012 | 02:54 PM
  #5180  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
I hear 5Dc's are going for around $500-600 now... that is a pretty nice deal for a sweet FF camera.
really. need another body coming up real soon.
Old 10-09-2012 | 03:11 PM
  #5181  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
5D3 "Fire sale" is back at Beach Camera $2899 - not sure how long it'll last -

http://deals.ebay.com/5000127934_Can...R_Camera__Body
Old 10-09-2012 | 06:46 PM
  #5182  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,519
Likes: 3,073
From: Vancouver BC
Cracks me up how the craigslist sellers here in Vancouver have little to zero sense of depreciation on gear, they'll list something for basically at msrp, yes granted you wouldn't be paying the 12% tax but still, you can order something from the States (cheaper price, free shipping, no tax) and have it shipped to one of many PO Box locations on the US border and just pick it up. It's like a 45 minutes drive.

And then you have the cheap assess that post WTB ads and state what they are willing to pay, and it's always super low
Old 10-09-2012 | 06:50 PM
  #5183  
mdkxtreme's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 322
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by is300eater
Cracks me up how the craigslist sellers here in Vancouver have little to zero sense of depreciation on gear, they'll list something for basically at msrp, yes granted you wouldn't be paying the 12% tax but still, you can order something from the States (cheaper price, free shipping, no tax) and have it shipped to one of many PO Box locations on the US border and just pick it up. It's like a 45 minutes drive.

And then you have the cheap assess that post WTB ads and state what they are willing to pay, and it's always super low


Amazon sells the Canon 50mm 1.8 for $105 + Free Shipping brand new.

Craigslist sellers in my area sells it for $100 used. Da fuq?
Old 10-10-2012 | 06:00 AM
  #5184  
einsatz's Avatar
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
I bought my nifty fifty for $89 at Penn Camera a few years ago. I sold it for $100 on Craigslist early this year to some teenage girl that probably didn't know better.

"What the market will bear"
Old 10-10-2012 | 10:41 AM
  #5185  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
I just don't understand why the canon 10-22mm used prices are alot lower than 6 months ago. They used to sell for 650 and up, now people are selling for around 60 to 100 less than that.
Old 10-10-2012 | 10:59 AM
  #5186  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by einsatz
I bought my nifty fifty for $89 at Penn Camera a few years ago. I sold it for $100 on Craigslist early this year to some teenage girl that probably didn't know better.

"What the market will bear"
a-ha!! so you are ONE OF THEM................ :pitchforks:

when I was shopping for 100 2.8L I looked on CL and found someone selling for $900. used, barely used. I thought it sounded like a good deal. Went back and forth with him a bit about it, and then I decided to check the price on Amazon. $929. and I went back to him and told him he was on crack for wanting to sell it for 900 and that I'd be interested if it was considerably lower than that, and that I'll just buy it new instead.
Old 10-10-2012 | 11:37 AM
  #5187  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Yea I am looking for a 135L at the moment. It looks like they are going for 850 used
Old 10-10-2012 | 06:00 PM
  #5188  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Just bought a RC-6 to help out with shooting.
Old 10-10-2012 | 06:42 PM
  #5189  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
oh yeah, the RX100 did come with a printed user manual. dunno where I read it wouldn't, got to love teh interwebs
Old 10-10-2012 | 08:16 PM
  #5190  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,519
Likes: 3,073
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by asianspec
Yea I am looking for a 135L at the moment. It looks like they are going for 850 used
That's a great price for that lens, the Sony/Zeiss 135mm f1.8 is still in the $1400-$1500 range (used), I think I paid $1375 for mine


Edit: wait, never mind. I just found the email with the seller, I paid $1175. Damn, I got a great deal on it

Last edited by is300eater; 10-10-2012 at 08:19 PM.
Old 10-10-2012 | 10:43 PM
  #5191  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
new 135L goes for $955 at B&H. I don't personally see $850 as being a "great" deal. Just my 2 cents!
Old 10-10-2012 | 11:34 PM
  #5192  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
new 135L goes for $955 at B&H. I don't personally see $850 as being a "great" deal. Just my 2 cents!
Probably if you look at paying 1300 or 1400 for a 135 vs 955 or 850. I am hoping by next June, I will have this and a 5dc on top of my current gear right now since I have a wedding to shoot. Now I need to win my bet between my brother and best friend so I can buy the calumet lighting system.
Old 10-10-2012 | 11:36 PM
  #5193  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
oh. anything is a great deal compared to Sony lenses. hehe
Old 10-10-2012 | 11:36 PM
  #5194  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,349
Likes: 2,827
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
I need to get a pocket wizard, gonna need it next month
Old 10-10-2012 | 11:42 PM
  #5195  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
oh. anything is a great deal compared to Sony lenses. hehe


I can't lie, Zeiss lenses are bad ass though. For the price, I dunno
Old 10-11-2012 | 12:05 AM
  #5196  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Mizouse
I need to get a pocket wizard, gonna need it next month
funny I just got my set of 2 cowboy studio flash triggers - first set for me! gonna have to see what this sh*t can do. it was hellaciously cheap I think like $30?
Old 10-11-2012 | 12:33 AM
  #5197  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,519
Likes: 3,073
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by asianspec


I can't lie, Zeiss lenses are bad ass though. For the price, I dunno
we also have the "G" line... I'm eyeing this next (but it's white, I'm not sure if I'm worthy of the "pro" status lol)
Old 10-11-2012 | 12:46 AM
  #5198  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
damn only $1999? I would have expected it to be closer to $5,000.
Old 10-11-2012 | 01:12 AM
  #5199  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,349
Likes: 2,827
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by srika
funny I just got my set of 2 cowboy studio flash triggers - first set for me! gonna have to see what this sh*t can do. it was hellaciously cheap I think like $30?
well what ill be using doesnt belong to me, so ill have to get a pocket wizard to be able to sync with it
Old 10-11-2012 | 01:39 AM
  #5200  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,345
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
funny I just got my set of 2 cowboy studio flash triggers - first set for me! gonna have to see what this sh*t can do. it was hellaciously cheap I think like $30?
i have them as well. they work pretty well and have pretty good range as well.


Quick Reply: C&P Random Thread -



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.