C&P Random Thread -
#5167
as said, I sold it to get the 24-70 2.8 - and I would guess that comparatively speaking overall the 24-70 is a better lens for the type of work I was doing (low-light) - but I could have continued with the 24-105 if I wanted. The things I missed the most was its compact size, light weight, IS, and extra reach.
The following users liked this post:
Undying Dreams (10-02-2012)
#5171
this is what I've been eyeing - one of my friends who has Elinchrom Rangers and other assorted high-end studio lighting recommends this every chance he gets - he has a few of these - they are great portable lighting solution and great price for what you get.
http://www.calumetphoto.com/eng/prod...system/cf0506k
http://www.calumetphoto.com/eng/prod...system/cf0506k
#5173
http://notastarvingartist.com/post/1...a-photographer
50 Reasons not to Date a Photographer
- They rather hold their bulky camera, than hold hands with you.
- On a romantic date, you’ll watch the sun go down and think “Wow this is gorgeous” and they’ll go “mirror lock, tripod, and stop down f/8 at 1/125.”
- You’ll never be able to enjoy tv, movies, or magazines because they’ll point out all the visual flaws.
- They like to sit in obscure coffee shop and voyeuristically watch people for great lengths of time.
- If you’re taking a walk outside and you come across some “interesting light” they will make you sit/stand/pose in public so that they can take a photo.
- You’ll never get to enjoy freshly cooked meals because they’ll spend 15 minutes taking 20 variations of the same dish with their iPhone.
- They get angry when your friends go up to them and say “I am interested in photography, can you recommend a good camera for me? Nothing professional I just want to take pretty pictures.”
- You’ll wait longer for them to finish analyzing art in a museum than you’ll wait at the dmv
- Same goes with old used bookstores.
- When you think they’re giving you their undivided attention, they’re really wondering how they could fix you with a little Clone Tool and Patch Tool.
- Or they are actually using you to not look so creepy as they people watch everything going on around you.
- They rather drop $1,000+ on new glass than a purse for you.
- You can’t take a photo with them without taking at least five more.
- If you ask them if you look fat, they’ll say “don’t worry I can photoshop you later.”
- They’ll never photoshop something simple for you if the content is not up to their “standards.”
- That photo they randomly took of you yesterday? Good luck getting them to send it to you.
- They spend all their time on the computer (and not for porn.)
- They can’t have a normal conversation without throwing acronyms and random numbers in.
- They still use film cameras.
- They spend a lot of time with people cooler than you i.e. models, actors, musicians, successful rich people.
- They’ll be fussy over the position of a common household object, like a coffee cup.
- They won’t return your calls or text messages, but you can bet they’re still posting pics on Instagram.
- They like watching old films that you’ve never heard or will ever understand.
- They like looking at weird things in general.
- Instead of having penis-envy, they have camera-gear-envy.
- If there’s a natural disaster in a far away land, they’re already on a plane going over there.
- Everything is watermarked.
- They think everyone else’s photos suck.
- They want to color correct a lot of scenes from Twilight and Jersey Shore.
- They hate rainbows, especially ones spinning in a circle.
- Whenever you’re in a group talking and the conversation goes deep, they’re taking notes in some form of Moleskine.
- They use over priced Moleskine notebooks.
- They like trespassing into old abandoned buildings filled with health hazards.
- They always want to show a new photo they took, but don’t really care if you like it or not.
- They hate your n00bie friend’s new artsy profile picture.
- Bright, sunny days make them sad, but cloudy, overcast days are apparently great!
- They’ll take you into places that have “culture” as well a high chance of getting mugged.
- Your birthday present will be a portrait that they’ve taken of you.
- You can’t go anywhere new without them stopping to take a photo of everything and anything.
- They will always bug you to be a test subject.
- Nothing can ever be naturally pretty, everything must be fixed in Photoshop.
- Bringing their camera means, bringing 50lbs of equipment.
- If you break any of their things on accident, you’ll owe them thousands of dollars.
- You can’t get them a birthday/Christmas present without spending at least $500
- They are natural hoarders, collecting and keeping piles of old newspapers, packaging, magazines, and other things that “inspire” them.
- They are weird and geeky.
- They have hard drives of photos, but probably have printed 10 images.
- They are always secretly judging your creativity.
- If you’re ever in auto mode, they laugh at you.
- They orgasm every time they learn a new lighting technique.
#5178
Hey Dave, have you seen this yet? damn brits.
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/09/...-the-bbc-test/
*starting to put on flame-retardant gear*
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/09/...-the-bbc-test/
Last week, we wrote that Nikon was tooting its own horn by claiming that both the D4 and D800 DSLRs had passed the European Broadcasting Union test, popularly known as the BBC test, making them the “first DSLR cameras fit for broadcast.” Now it appears that the horns were tooted prematurely, as the BBC is refuting Nikon’s interpretation of the tests.
Here’s how the original news article appeared on the Australian My Nikon Life website:
BBC Contradicts Nikons Claim That Its DSLRs Passed the BBC Test original
In our writeup, we reported that there seemed to be some confusion over what constituted “passing” the test, since the results don’t include a simple rating or pass/fail indication. More specifically, the D800′s results also had the harsh conclusion, “This camera cannot be recommended for serious programme-making,” suggesting that it failed, rather than passed, the test.
Shortly afterward, the original post was deleted from the Nikon website, and replaced with a new article that only claims that the D4 passed:
BBC Contradicts Nikons Claim That Its DSLRs Passed the BBC Test revised
Nikon might need to make a second revision, as now the BBC is saying that neither camera passed the test.
Andy Quested, the broadcasting company’s Head of Technology, has responded to Nikon’s claim in an email to The Phoblographer and in a comment on our post, saying,
Nikon’s latest DSLRs are certainly drawing rave reviews for the performance of their sensors, but it seems the company — or, at least the Australian division’s PR agency — got ahead of itself with this latest “fit for broadcasting” claim.
Read more at http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/09/...KZm7wxOLPbj.99
Here’s how the original news article appeared on the Australian My Nikon Life website:
BBC Contradicts Nikons Claim That Its DSLRs Passed the BBC Test original
In our writeup, we reported that there seemed to be some confusion over what constituted “passing” the test, since the results don’t include a simple rating or pass/fail indication. More specifically, the D800′s results also had the harsh conclusion, “This camera cannot be recommended for serious programme-making,” suggesting that it failed, rather than passed, the test.
Shortly afterward, the original post was deleted from the Nikon website, and replaced with a new article that only claims that the D4 passed:
BBC Contradicts Nikons Claim That Its DSLRs Passed the BBC Test revised
Nikon might need to make a second revision, as now the BBC is saying that neither camera passed the test.
Andy Quested, the broadcasting company’s Head of Technology, has responded to Nikon’s claim in an email to The Phoblographer and in a comment on our post, saying,
The cameras did not “pass” and the BBC is not and will not be using them for HD programmes.
Here are the sections from the test report
D4
[...] However, even though the sensor has 16.8 million photo-sites, it achieves only about 1,355×764, only a little better than 1,280×720 [...]
800
[...] Video performance is not really acceptable at 1080p, much less so at 720p. Even though the sensor has 36.8 million photo-sites, it achieves only about 1,355×764, little better than 1,280×720 [...]
Here are the sections from the test report
D4
[...] However, even though the sensor has 16.8 million photo-sites, it achieves only about 1,355×764, only a little better than 1,280×720 [...]
800
[...] Video performance is not really acceptable at 1080p, much less so at 720p. Even though the sensor has 36.8 million photo-sites, it achieves only about 1,355×764, little better than 1,280×720 [...]
Read more at http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/09/...KZm7wxOLPbj.99
*starting to put on flame-retardant gear*
#5180
#5181
5D3 "Fire sale" is back at Beach Camera $2899 - not sure how long it'll last -
http://deals.ebay.com/5000127934_Can...R_Camera__Body
http://deals.ebay.com/5000127934_Can...R_Camera__Body
#5182
Cracks me up how the craigslist sellers here in Vancouver have little to zero sense of depreciation on gear, they'll list something for basically at msrp, yes granted you wouldn't be paying the 12% tax but still, you can order something from the States (cheaper price, free shipping, no tax) and have it shipped to one of many PO Box locations on the US border and just pick it up. It's like a 45 minutes drive.
And then you have the cheap assess that post WTB ads and state what they are willing to pay, and it's always super low
And then you have the cheap assess that post WTB ads and state what they are willing to pay, and it's always super low
#5183
Cracks me up how the craigslist sellers here in Vancouver have little to zero sense of depreciation on gear, they'll list something for basically at msrp, yes granted you wouldn't be paying the 12% tax but still, you can order something from the States (cheaper price, free shipping, no tax) and have it shipped to one of many PO Box locations on the US border and just pick it up. It's like a 45 minutes drive.
And then you have the cheap assess that post WTB ads and state what they are willing to pay, and it's always super low
And then you have the cheap assess that post WTB ads and state what they are willing to pay, and it's always super low
Amazon sells the Canon 50mm 1.8 for $105 + Free Shipping brand new.
Craigslist sellers in my area sells it for $100 used. Da fuq?
#5184
I bought my nifty fifty for $89 at Penn Camera a few years ago. I sold it for $100 on Craigslist early this year to some teenage girl that probably didn't know better.
"What the market will bear"
"What the market will bear"
#5185
I just don't understand why the canon 10-22mm used prices are alot lower than 6 months ago. They used to sell for 650 and up, now people are selling for around 60 to 100 less than that.
#5186
when I was shopping for 100 2.8L I looked on CL and found someone selling for $900. used, barely used. I thought it sounded like a good deal. Went back and forth with him a bit about it, and then I decided to check the price on Amazon. $929. and I went back to him and told him he was on crack for wanting to sell it for 900 and that I'd be interested if it was considerably lower than that, and that I'll just buy it new instead.
#5190
Edit: wait, never mind. I just found the email with the seller, I paid $1175. Damn, I got a great deal on it
Last edited by is300eater; 10-10-2012 at 08:19 PM.
#5192
Probably if you look at paying 1300 or 1400 for a 135 vs 955 or 850. I am hoping by next June, I will have this and a 5dc on top of my current gear right now since I have a wedding to shoot. Now I need to win my bet between my brother and best friend so I can buy the calumet lighting system.
#5196
#5197
#5199
#5200