C&P Random Thread -
#4881
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
oh yeah... that one.....
I guess I have to get a D800... along with a Canon mount adapter... guess I'll be shooting MF for a while lol
I guess I have to get a D800... along with a Canon mount adapter... guess I'll be shooting MF for a while lol
#4882
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
so now do I get the D800 or D800E...
I don't get why for the benefit of sharper image I have to deal with moire patterns... :dumb:
I don't get why for the benefit of sharper image I have to deal with moire patterns... :dumb:
#4883
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
You arent doing landscapes of rolling hills and mountains...moire will be a larger issue with cityscapes and the patterns found there in.
And ALL the tests have shown the E is only slightly sharper under specific conditions.
The E is a VERY specialized model and so many people just refuse to understand that. (not saying you...just seen one too many morons on the forums)
The following 2 users liked this post by Sarlacc:
jupitersolo (08-28-2012),
srika (08-28-2012)
#4884
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
Also, this is hilarious compared to your 15 FB posts on WHY you wouldnt get the Nikon
The following 3 users liked this post by Sarlacc:
#4885
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
not sure what you are talking about
you know what - I'm all about dynamic range and low-light - so those are my #1 priorities -
ok that's all I need to know - D800 it is
you know what - I'm all about dynamic range and low-light - so those are my #1 priorities -
ok that's all I need to know - D800 it is
The following 2 users liked this post by srika:
is300eater (08-28-2012),
jupitersolo (08-28-2012)
#4886
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
Funny you came to this decision right as the D800 is finally more widely available
The following users liked this post:
srika (08-28-2012)
#4887
Earth-bound misfit
At least I'll be less jealous!
#4888
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
HEY - the fb thread is a part of the 'research' and 'rationalization' process.......
#4889
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,308
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,991 Posts
The following users liked this post:
srika (08-28-2012)
#4890
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,308
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,991 Posts
what about the 1-3 second recycle time? is that "OK"? asking generally, to anyone who has any comment on it
Re: http://www.calumetphoto.com/eng/prod...system/cf0506k
Re: http://www.calumetphoto.com/eng/prod...system/cf0506k
The following 2 users liked this post by Mizouse:
is300eater (08-28-2012),
srika (08-28-2012)
#4891
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
uh oh. my plan to use MF with Canon lenses on the D800 may not be a good one... as I was planning to rely heavily on Live View for accurate focus...
http://www.fredmiranda.com/5DIII-D800/
http://www.fredmiranda.com/5DIII-D800/
Next, it was time to let the Nikon out of the bag. I quickly set it up, as I cursed out the light that was beginning to fade already and tried to manually focus. Dusk was upon me and I was not prepared for the frustration that was to follow. I tried my best to focus using Nikon's live view. To achieve critical focus I looked for nuances as I slowly turned the focusing ring on the lens. Surprisingly, in the field under this variable lighting, the image seemed to be interpolated as I used higher magnification. It was a mess. I had never experienced this before and wasted so much time playing around with the live view, that I missed the light. I still took a few shots even though I knew they weren't usable just so I would have something to look at. When reviewing these images on the LCD, I noticed they had a green cast and a low contrast look to them. Needless to say, this did nothing for my self-esteem in the field. My solution - Delete.
I tried not to read too much into this. The point is, if you don't use a manual lens or rely on live view for critical focusing, this shortcoming is not really an issue. It's more of an adjustment for those of us accustomed to using this feature. After testing Nikon's live view manual focusing in the field, I quickly came to the conclusion that Canon's implementation worked better for the applications I need. Perhaps because Nikon's depth of field preview is always "live" and there's a lag time from when you make your adjustment to when you actually see the results. For this reason, Nikon's live view at higher magnification appeared pixelated and nailing focus was not easy. However, with the Canon you get to preview depth of field by simply pressing a button. Therefore, the changes appear faster and the nuances necessary for focusing are much easier to see.
I tried not to read too much into this. The point is, if you don't use a manual lens or rely on live view for critical focusing, this shortcoming is not really an issue. It's more of an adjustment for those of us accustomed to using this feature. After testing Nikon's live view manual focusing in the field, I quickly came to the conclusion that Canon's implementation worked better for the applications I need. Perhaps because Nikon's depth of field preview is always "live" and there's a lag time from when you make your adjustment to when you actually see the results. For this reason, Nikon's live view at higher magnification appeared pixelated and nailing focus was not easy. However, with the Canon you get to preview depth of field by simply pressing a button. Therefore, the changes appear faster and the nuances necessary for focusing are much easier to see.
#4892
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
so now I am looking at getting a couple of lenses to start out with the D800 - I am thinking of the 16-35 f/4 and the higher end 50 1.4... the 28-300 would be nice for wide range -
#4893
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
anyone wanna buy a 7D?
edit: scratch that.... I like having a crop body for the zoom reach... and also I need it for best use of the fisheye... (full coverage)
edit: scratch that.... I like having a crop body for the zoom reach... and also I need it for best use of the fisheye... (full coverage)
#4894
I have heard nothing but GOOD about the 28-300, it has it's limitations, but for one lens it does very well. 16-35 again a great lens. I would look at 85 1.8g before 50mm, unless you really like that length.
#4895
I shoot people
you're such a camera slut
The following 5 users liked this post by is300eater:
asianspec (08-28-2012),
Mizouse (08-28-2012),
MWalsh9152 (08-28-2012),
srika (08-28-2012),
wndrlst (08-28-2012)
#4896
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
yeah I was surprised to read the reviews - I was especially intrigued by how close it can focus, even at 300mm... I do prefer 50mm so I can use it at the clubs
#4898
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
#4899
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#4900
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
#4901
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
the 28-300 is an FX lens right?
#4902
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
Yup, its an FX lens
Optimized for edge to edge sharpness on both FX and DX-format D-SLRs
DX-format D-SLR angle of view is equivalent to a focal length of 42-450mm in FX/35mm format.
Optimized for edge to edge sharpness on both FX and DX-format D-SLRs
DX-format D-SLR angle of view is equivalent to a focal length of 42-450mm in FX/35mm format.
#4903
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
That's crazy. Alright I think that's a good combo to start out with! YOLO
#4904
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
The following users liked this post:
jupitersolo (08-28-2012)
#4905
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
I dont see any "i ordered one" posts...
#4906
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I rather just post in the equipment thread...
#4907
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#4908
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I haven't ordered it yet -
#4909
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
#4910
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
that's insane!
#4911
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
Nikon is only a 1.5x enhancement
#4912
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
oh. I figured 36 down to 15 was greater than 1.5
#4914
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
geez
#4915
all work and no play
I actually was just looking for a "The dark side" Nikon themed pic when I saw that one and couldnt resist.
The comparisons really seem to make it a no brainer for someone in your league though. Gonna pull the trigger?
The comparisons really seem to make it a no brainer for someone in your league though. Gonna pull the trigger?
#4916
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
it's on the brain
#4918
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,308
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,991 Posts
Do it!!!!
#4919
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
nope. I think I'm gonna buy some more Canon gear
#4920
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,308
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,991 Posts
YOu know you want it
The following users liked this post:
srika (08-28-2012)