Subaru to build Toyota Camry in the U.S. Lafayette, Indiana - As part of a collaborative agreement that includes developing new hybrids, Toyota and Fuji Heavy Industries (FHI) have announced that Subaru's Indiana Automotive plant (SIA) will begin producing the Toyota Camry, starting in 2007. Toyota has an 8.7 per cent stake in FHI, which is the parent company of Subaru. |
:what: I thought GM had 100% (or a large interest) in FHI? When did Toyota get involved with Subaru?
|
^^ more like 25%, and I think they have already sold it to raise cash.
|
Originally Posted by RandyMax
^^ more like 25%, and I think they have already sold it to raise cash.
Yup, GM sold their stake and Toyota swiftly bought up I think ~10%? |
Does this mean the next generation Camry will be based on Baja/Legacy/Outback mechanicals?
|
This = AWD Camrys?
|
The 2007 Altima can show up any time now ... like ... NOW ... or ... NOW!!!
ugh!!!! :sad: SHIFT_today |
this came out of nowhere. By the way, that Subie IN plant is a great facility. I believe the Legacy is made there.
|
Originally Posted by M TYPE X
The 2007 Altima can show up any time now ... like ... NOW ... or ... NOW!!!
ugh!!!! :sad: SHIFT_today Speaking of the Altima, Nissan only needs to modify a few things to make it more competitive. I think the mid-cycle make over made it among the best looking family sedan, still dont like the big taillights, though. It's going to be an exciting time for the midsize family sedan, to see what Nissan and Honda, and even mazda, have up their sleeves in response to the new Camry. |
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
this came out of nowhere. By the way, that Subie IN plant is a great facility. I believe the Legacy is made there.
I believe that the Tribeca is built in Japan, currently, even though it's not sold in the Japanese market. If Subaru cuts the Baja model, it might free up their line somewhat. I don't know the production figures, I should look them up in Automotive News and write them down [I was looking at the chart tonight in the copy at Borders]. |
Originally Posted by M TYPE X
I believe that the Tribeca is built in Japan, currently, even though it's not sold in the Japanese market.
|
Toyota better be very very very careful. I remember when the Baja came out, CR did not like its reliability at all. A big black dot in Consumer Reports for the Camry would really fuck shit up quickly!
|
Originally Posted by TypeSAddict
Toyota better be very very very careful. I remember when the Baja came out, CR did not like its reliability at all. A big black dot in Consumer Reports for the Camry would really fuck shit up quickly!
The Baja seems to have been an anomoly, nothing but half red dots and above for Subby right now. IIRC only Lexus and Mitsubishi out of the other Japanese manufacturers can claim only red/hal red dots across the board, not Toyota, Honda, Acura, Infiniti, Nissan or Scion can! |
I was browsing Motor Trend at Costco (they sell magazines now!) and it was a 3-way win for Toyota.
First it was the Prius vs. Civic hybrid...they gave the nod to the Prius for its superior mileage and spaciousness over the Civic. Then it was the new Camry hybrid vs. the Accord hybrid...they gave the nod to the Camry for its consistently better mileage over the Accord, and its lower price than the Accord (I think the difference was quoted at 3K or 4K, I forget, but it was a pretty big chunk). Accord was praised for its acceleration. But get this, the Camry hybrid (mated only to the 4-cylinder) was 131 pounds heavier than the Accord hybrid (which is mated only to the 6-cylinder) :what: And then there was a four-way comparo between the Toyota FJ Cruiser, Nissan X-Terra, Hummer H3, and Jeep Liberty Renegade. FJ Cruiser came in 1st place, Liberty Renegade came in last. I think I remembered the X-terra being in 2nd place. |
Think all three of those winners come down to personal preference rather than one car really being superior to the other.
|
Toyota announced manufacturer’s suggested retail prices (MSRP) today for the all-new and much-anticipated 2007 Camry Hybrid.
The all-new Camry Hybrid will have a base MSRP of $25,900. The new Camry Hybrid will reach Toyota dealers this May. The car has 187 horsepower and milage of 40 mpg in the city and 38 mpg on the highway. Recently, the automaker said the gasoline version of the Camry would start at $18,270 |
Camry tops 4-way V6 comparo on Edmunds:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=109710 1 - Camry XLE V6 2- Honda Accord EX V6 3- Hyundai Sonata LX V6 4- Ford Fusion SEL V6 The new V6 model dusted the competition in the acceleration race. And if it were for the 4-cylinder models, I don't think the order would be any different. |
First, it must be said that the V6 Accord's total score was only a fraction of a point behind the all-new 2007 Toyota Camry. Where the Camry excelled in performance, the Accord did so in feature content. Where the Camry was strong in our 24-point evaluation, the Accord was better on price.
Both earned identical scores on our personal and recommended ratings. It was that close. Considering the Accord's four-year generation gap, it deserves high praise for faring as well as it did against its all-new nemesis. |
^^ The Accord is truly a great car. Although those times seem rather slow.
But Toyota seems to be on a unstoppable roll. |
I don't see Honda throwing in a 3.5L V6 into the next gen Accord solely to match Toyota. I'd expect a 3.2 or 3.3L V6 with ~270 HP and better MPG than the Camry.
|
Originally Posted by dom
I don't see Honda throwing in a 3.5L V6 into the next gen Accord solely to match Toyota. I'd expect a 3.2 or 3.3L V6 with ~270 HP and better MPG than the Camry.
|
I don't think Honda's going to respond lightly with this threat from Toyota (which IMO will probably be the best Camry ever). I think they will go with a 3.5L. They said without Honda, Acura could not be. So they'll have to put worrying about stepping on the TL's toes on the #2 spot in their list of things to do. #1 priority is Camry.
|
These midsize cars don't need extra HP. Hell, I drive a 4-cylinder 2006 Accord EX and it has plenty of power for what the car is. Putting this much HP and Torque in a FWD family sedan is just silly IMO. There is a reason why the 4-cylinder versions of these cars make up the vast majority of sales as this is more than enough engine for these cars.
|
Originally Posted by deandorsey
First, it must be said that the V6 Accord's total score was only a fraction of a point behind the all-new 2007 Toyota Camry. Where the Camry excelled in performance, the Accord did so in feature content. Where the Camry was strong in our 24-point evaluation, the Accord was better on price.
Both earned identical scores on our personal and recommended ratings. It was that close. Considering the Accord's four-year generation gap, it deserves high praise for faring as well as it did against its all-new nemesis. With the anticipation of parents watching their child win a spelling bee with the final letter, we watched the Camry's point total edge out the Accord's by a 0.64 margin. Despite what this might indicate, there really was no dispute regarding which of these four cars should win the comparison |
Originally Posted by gilboman
i guess you missed this part? :thumbsup:
With the anticipation of parents watching their child win a spelling bee with the final letter, we watched the Camry's point total edge out the Accord's by a 0.64 margin. Despite what this might indicate, there really was no dispute regarding which of these four cars should win the comparison Whoopee Gilbo. The new Camry has 4 years of development/technology on the Accord. No surprise that the Camry won. |
i saw one of these driving along highway 5 on my way from the bay area to LA, i dunno imo the front grill of the car looks funny to me.
and then i was passed again by the new M5 (happened last time when i was driving from bay area to LA at the end of my winter break) |
Originally Posted by gilboman
i guess you missed this part? :thumbsup:
With the anticipation of parents watching their child win a spelling bee with the final letter, we watched the Camry's point total edge out the Accord's by a 0.64 margin. Despite what this might indicate, there really was no dispute regarding which of these four cars should win the comparison |
Originally Posted by TypeSAddict
Toyota better be very very very careful. I remember when the Baja came out, CR did not like its reliability at all. A big black dot in Consumer Reports for the Camry would really fuck shit up quickly!
Lots of other people other than me are complaining about the new front end and grille. Well, guess what, I'll say it before & I'll say it again: give Granny that V6 in HER Camry, and you'll only be seeing those snazzy taillamps! :nod: |
Originally Posted by cusdaddy
These midsize cars don't need extra HP. Hell, I drive a 4-cylinder 2006 Accord EX and it has plenty of power for what the car is. Putting this much HP and Torque in a FWD family sedan is just silly IMO. There is a reason why the 4-cylinder versions of these cars make up the vast majority of sales as this is more than enough engine for these cars.
|
Game over. Toyota had about 5 new Camrys at the auto show and they were all mobbed by onlookers waiting to sit and feel the interior. Interior quality surpasses that even of the Accord. The faux wood looked authentic (though I don't like the yellow color). In base models those panels remain plastic, which look bare, but still very good quality. Roomy inside, I really couldn't discern how much bigger (if any) the interior volume is over the old Camry. But wow I was very impressed.
|
game over? indeed it is over. good job toyota, 5 years later and you finally have a nice interior. the 7g accords interior blew away the old camry's. of course they had to do something. but i don't understand this "game over" stuff. is it similar to "honda has to step up now"? step up to what? can't say much until the new accord comes out next year. same deal with the cr-v and rav4. it finally catches up to the cr-v in size and suddenly it's game over for the cr-v. :rofl: i can't stop laughing when people post things like that.
|
Originally Posted by iNteGraz92
game over? indeed it is over. good job toyota, 5 years later and you finally have a nice interior. the 7g accords interior blew away the old camry's. of course they had to do something. but i don't understand this "game over" stuff. is it similar to "honda has to step up now"? step up to what? can't say much until the new accord comes out next year. same deal with the cr-v and rav4. it finally catches up to the cr-v in size and suddenly it's game over for the cr-v. :rofl: i can't stop laughing when people post things like that.
:agree: And I was more impressed by the Sonata's interior materials than I was with the new Camry's at the Detroit show. |
Originally Posted by dom
:agree:
And I was more impressed by the Sonata's interior materials than I was with the new Camry's at the Detroit show. |
Originally Posted by dom
:agree:
And I was more impressed by the Sonata's interior materials than I was with the new Camry's at the Detroit show. |
Of course the fact that a comparably equipped V6 Camry cost 2500 more would probably cause some people to think twice.
|
I must be the only one that thinks the new Camry is totally hideous. I'm also unimpressed by auto makers stuffed 250hp+ V6's in FWD mid-sized sedans. When does the new Accord come out? :/
|
Originally Posted by JackieO
I must be the only one that thinks the new Camry is totally hideous. I'm also unimpressed by auto makers stuffed 250hp+ V6's in FWD mid-sized sedans. When does the new Accord come out? :/
|
The mid cycle refresh just happened, so yeah at least 2 more years with the current Accord. I'm concerned for Honda, though. It won't take much to make the Accord better...but I'm afraid they might pull something weird like the Civic's dash or repeat the taillight debacle.
|
Originally Posted by JackieO
I must be the only one that thinks the new Camry is totally hideous. I'm also unimpressed by auto makers stuffed 250hp+ V6's in FWD mid-sized sedans. When does the new Accord come out? :/
So are you saying you wnat the new Accord to have less tha 250hp? :tomato: |
Think its to the point were these new cars can only get marginally better than their previous gens. If the new Accord were to have a huge gain in quality etc, it would be an Acura. Think the major part to a restyle is coming up with an attractive design that impresses people rather than huge engines or materials that are very high quality..
|
i would love to see 'civic' like accord. a current design failed. almost none of think it's a great design. and civic interior is cool!
i love camry's rear and interior, but still not used to the front. probably never will. sonata looks great in person especially the rear, but interior still needs work. i wish sonata had azera's interior. but then people won't buy expensive sonata yet. |
sonata would look great if it had interior like this with navi. but then it would cost more, and people won't buy expensive sonata.
http://auto.joins.com/image_gallery/...gl33005_11.jpg |
it's all about the material.
too bad they don't offer these in america. i've sat on these, and it's 10 times than the u.s version. they need to bring the navis and all the other goodies sooner or later to compete with the big boys. http://file2.bobaedream.co.kr/pds/Cy...g_38109_10.jpg http://file2.bobaedream.co.kr/pds/Cy...g_38109_14.jpg http://file2.bobaedream.co.kr/pds/Cy...mg_38109_4.jpg http://file2.bobaedream.co.kr/pds/Cy...g_38109_11.jpg http://file2.bobaedream.co.kr/pds/Cy...mg_38109_8.jpg http://file2.bobaedream.co.kr/pds/Cy...mg_38109_9.jpg |
Toyota Recalling Camry - - Source: The Car Connection
The newest edition of the Toyota Camry is being recalled for a problem with the transmission. The problem, Toyota says, involved only a half-percent of Camrys built thus far for the 2007 model year. The new six-speed automatic transmission could lose second and sixth gear during operation. Toyota told Reuters the vehicle still will operate even if the gears are lost, and that the problem usually happens within the first 500 miles of use. |
Junk!
Drive a Honda. :nod: |
Does any Lexus have tranny problems too? :wish:
|
Originally Posted by MSZ
Does any Lexus have tranny problems too? :wish:
And most likely no...seeing as the new ES hasn't been released yet. |
Originally Posted by The Sarlacc
What the fuck are you hoping that one for?
BTW, I don't have a CL or TL. |
ouch.
|
figured something was up after someone made that post in car talk i think
|
Originally Posted by The Sarlacc
What the fuck are you hoping that one for?
And most likely no...seeing as the new ES hasn't been released yet. |
Originally Posted by M TYPE X
Junk!
Drive a Honda. :nod: |
Anyone who compares the Honda issue to the Toyota and leaves out the fact that Toyota addressed it in WEEKS! vs Honda which took years...
If your going to compare owning a vehicle based on problems... which manufacturer would I rather be with? one who ignores the issue or one who acknowledges it and produces a fix in a timely manner. |
exactly
|
Originally Posted by SiGGy
Anyone who compares the Honda issue to the Toyota and leaves out the fact that Toyota addressed it in WEEKS! vs Honda which took years...
If your going to compare owning a vehicle based on problems... which manufacturer would I rather be with? one who ignores the issue or one who acknowledges it and produces a fix in a timely manner. As much as I hate agreeing with Siggy, :werd: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands