Official 05RL info ***PG 4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2004, 10:32 PM
  #41  
Moderator Alumnus
 
provench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 51
Posts: 4,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 07-29-2004, 11:21 AM
  #42  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
justin after brainstorming a little some more questions popped into my head.

Is the new RL going to have a "Leather Interior". Judging by those pictures on the mini-site, it looked like there was an extensive use of leather (perforated and supple, which reminds me... what type of leather is it going to be?)
Also, is there going to be a different type of wood (birds-eye, maple, chestnut) for the taupe or parchment interior? The only company I know who offers only walnut (like that in the pictures) on all their interior colors is MB.
If you do get to answering these questions thank you, really appreciate it. It's not every lifetime you get to ask an Acura insider questions he can answer .
Oh, and can we get an MSRP figure? Again thanks for any answers, and feel free to add to our knowledge some cool features we know nothing about.
Old 07-30-2004, 01:39 PM
  #43  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm guess not. oh well i'll learn in time .
Old 07-30-2004, 01:42 PM
  #44  
OG
 
justinjsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
hmm guess not. oh well i'll learn in time .
The Qs you asked I do not have the As to. I hate making guesses...so, once I know I will let you know.
Old 07-30-2004, 02:00 PM
  #45  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw
The Qs you asked I do not have the As to. I hate making guesses...so, once I know I will let you know.
oh, ok then. i appreciate the feedback regardless .
Old 07-30-2004, 04:04 PM
  #46  
Teh ?
 
Junkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Age: 46
Posts: 12,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This RL is looking better and better (not visually)...

Seems like this is going to be like the TL and TSX... everything is standard, with only three or four configuration... everything is standard.

Junkster, who sometimes doesn't like leather interiors
Old 07-30-2004, 06:47 PM
  #47  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
260lbs of torque? Another torqueless wonder. And this car is as visually exciting as a LS 430 or Civic or Kia. I hope this thing is not 4000 lbs.
Old 07-30-2004, 07:51 PM
  #48  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,664
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Do you ever get tired of ragging on the RL?
Old 07-30-2004, 08:56 PM
  #49  
Burning Brakes
 
swami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Michigan...Go Blue
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All I have to say is, that fawkers badass. I can't believe anyone that likes the TSX, doesn't like the new RL. I'm hoping maybe in 2 years when the TSX goes back, there will be a nice clean 05 RL CPO of course. Hey ya never know.
Old 07-30-2004, 09:28 PM
  #50  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
Age: 50
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
260lbs of torque? Another torqueless wonder. And this car is as visually exciting as a LS 430 or Civic or Kia. I hope this thing is not 4000 lbs.
An RL will SMOKE an LS on the track. Enough with your blathering.
Old 07-30-2004, 10:26 PM
  #51  
8th Gear
 
inversereality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central NC
Age: 36
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember reading that the engine in the RL will be dubbed S-VTEC. Is that true, and, if so, what technology does that name refer to?
Old 07-30-2004, 10:46 PM
  #52  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
260lbs of torque? Another torqueless wonder. And this car is as visually exciting as a LS 430 or Civic or Kia. I hope this thing is not 4000 lbs.
That's pretty gratuitious. Please drive it before making such a comment. And the visual of a Kia...
Old 07-31-2004, 12:06 AM
  #53  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by inversereality
I remember reading that the engine in the RL will be dubbed S-VTEC. Is that true, and, if so, what technology does that name refer to?
I read that stands for SOHC VTEC (IF I'm not mistaken). I remember reading that in an article. Anyone is more than welcome to correct me if I'm wrong, which is probably the case ( as the SOHC 3.2L NSX and TL are simply VTEC).
Old 07-31-2004, 02:51 AM
  #54  
Burning Brakes
 
Andynolife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Age: 38
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it looks nice .. better than wut i was expecting .. .. the concept pics look alot worse than the real pics ... not bad and see some big improving on the exterior and interior ...
it's good that many featrues r standard ...
and this is probably how Acura deal with other competitions
Old 07-31-2004, 01:29 PM
  #55  
Old fart
 
TSX 'R' US's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 20,455
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
I can't wait till it hits the showrooms!!
Old 07-31-2004, 01:58 PM
  #56  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
It didn't take long for the Autospies trolls to take the pics we've seen recently and push them on their site.
I don't think much else new will develop before the first RD.
Old 07-31-2004, 03:13 PM
  #57  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason
An RL will SMOKE an LS on the track. Enough with your blathering.
Who cares? I know of one person that tracks their LS. 99.9% don't do anything to it. The current RL owners are the same. Acura is hoping new RL owners are different, I guess.
Old 07-31-2004, 05:47 PM
  #58  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
Age: 50
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Who cares? I know of one person that tracks their LS. 99.9% don't do anything to it. The current RL owners are the same. Acura is hoping new RL owners are different, I guess.
You know, you're right. I thought about that after I posted it. That IS a pretty sad comparison. But I would be willing to bet the RL could smoke ANY LEXUS on the track.

So if you are going to lament what you consider to be a lack of torque in the RL, and therefore you assume that Acura and Lexus buyers want a sporty car, you must concede that the car will be as sporty as any of the Lexuses [sic] in the stable.

Most car owners don't know anything about torque anyway, especially Lexus owners.
Old 07-31-2004, 06:08 PM
  #59  
OG
 
justinjsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
I read that stands for SOHC VTEC (IF I'm not mistaken). I remember reading that in an article. Anyone is more than welcome to correct me if I'm wrong, which is probably the case ( as the SOHC 3.2L NSX and TL are simply VTEC).
The 3.2 V6 in the NSX is a DOHC unlike the SOHC 3.2 in the TLs.
Old 07-31-2004, 06:12 PM
  #60  
Burning Brakes
 
Andynolife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Age: 38
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
agree ... ~~ Lexus owners dont even looks at their spec. carefully .. ~~ all they can see is their Lexus sign ......
Toyota engine yeak :fingerfawk: im too young for those kind of cars ...
but i probably wont consider a toyota/Lexus when i have a family .. ~~ y not go for BMM/MB for a bit more ... Lexus's price is weird
Old 08-05-2004, 12:22 PM
  #61  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw
The 3.2 V6 in the NSX is a DOHC unlike the SOHC 3.2 in the TLs.
. Thanks for correcting me.
Old 08-05-2004, 02:45 PM
  #62  
Burning Brakes
 
Andynolife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Age: 38
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah ... ~~ that's weird that they still using SOHC ..... i thought Honda is master of DOHC engines ... maybe they r too chicken to introduce a V6 DOHC to kick some asses ....
or it's only make for NSX .. ~~
Old 08-16-2004, 05:26 PM
  #63  
Instructor
 
ccheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 RL production

2005 RL production will be around 10/10/2004. We should expect to get the first shipment by November instead of October.

:gheywave:
Old 08-16-2004, 09:27 PM
  #64  
Intermediate
 
danny1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 44
Posts: 29
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Cool... RL #1 and I will share the same birthday :-D
Old 08-17-2004, 05:15 AM
  #65  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
Originally Posted by ccheung
2005 RL production will be around 10/10/2004. We should expect to get the first shipment by November instead of October.

:gheywave:
This sounds like you got as good info as the Oracle usually has.
Old 08-18-2004, 07:39 AM
  #66  
Instructor
 
ccheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also work for Acura for quite a while but justin can get info faster over the west coast though. I am usually 2 weeks behind even for Ride and Drive event.
Old 08-24-2004, 03:32 AM
  #67  
Instructor
 
smap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Age: 40
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
260lbs of torque? Another torqueless wonder. And this car is as visually exciting as a LS 430 or Civic or Kia. I hope this thing is not 4000 lbs.
I still dont get this................
Why every hater says this crap..
Im assuming the RL has a 3.5l engine or somewhere in that vacinity............
How is that a "torqueless wonder"..........
How is 260lbs of torque low for a 3.5l (assuming that it is a 3.5l engine)

Anyone know whats the displacement of the RL's engine by the way?

Im a noob!
Old 08-24-2004, 05:38 AM
  #68  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
Originally Posted by smap
I still dont get this................
Why every hater says this crap..
Im assuming the RL has a 3.5l engine or somewhere in that vacinity............
How is that a "torqueless wonder"..........
How is 260lbs of torque low for a 3.5l (assuming that it is a 3.5l engine)

Anyone know whats the displacement of the RL's engine by the way?

Im a noob!
I guess the dropping of the 3.5 out of the RL name made people wonder about the engine displacement. It's a 3.5L V6 that puts out more HP than any other 3.5L on the market (the Nissan VQ puts out 295HP in the 05 G35 coupe, MB 3.5 is around 260HP). And the torque is right up there also for displacement of its size (the VQ has 270lbs).
Old 08-24-2004, 09:55 AM
  #69  
Instructor
 
ccheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dealer principal meeting is being held in Chicago as we speak! It is the showcase for 05 RL for GMs and Dealers. It started yesterday and I hope my GM can take some digital pictures so I can share with every one when she comes back on Friday!
Old 08-24-2004, 10:00 AM
  #70  
Instructor
 
smap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Age: 40
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanx Biker............
Thats what I dont understand its 3.5l so how can 260lbs of torque or 352Nm be low for that amount of displacement!
So I dont get this "torqueless wonder" bullsh*t that goes around!
Old 08-24-2004, 10:06 AM
  #71  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,664
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by smap
Thanx Biker............
Thats what I dont understand its 3.5l so how can 260lbs of torque or 352Nm be low for that amount of displacement!
So I dont get this "torqueless wonder" bullsh*t that goes around!
That's exactly what it is...BS from trolls...I don't think it needs any validation.
Old 08-24-2004, 12:28 PM
  #72  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by smap
I still dont get this................
Why every hater says this crap..
Im assuming the RL has a 3.5l engine or somewhere in that vacinity............
How is that a "torqueless wonder"..........
How is 260lbs of torque low for a 3.5l (assuming that it is a 3.5l engine)

Anyone know whats the displacement of the RL's engine by the way?

Im a noob!
I don't get it either. It makes way more torque per liter than the LS430. And it makes the same torque as the current VQ35 Nissan engine, which is the same size and ALWAYS described as "torquey". I don't think that's torqueless at all. Maybe it's just me...
Old 08-24-2004, 01:46 PM
  #73  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
The overall performance, especially in the new RL with SHAWD, is also influenced by more than just numbers., You could have a 400HP engine with most of it above say 5000RPM and it would suck at 0-60 times. Or you could have a very uneven torque curve that makes for uneven accelaration. And of course for the new RL who knows what the SHAWD will do for performance. We'll just have to wait and see.
Old 08-24-2004, 05:31 PM
  #74  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,664
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
I don't expect the new RL to be some sub 6 seconds 0-60 car. I doubt it'll be available with a manual anyway. It'll probably be mid to high 6's, which is very good for a V6, IMO.
Old 08-24-2004, 07:10 PM
  #75  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
I don't expect the new RL to be some sub 6 seconds 0-60 car. I doubt it'll be available with a manual anyway. It'll probably be mid to high 6's, which is very good for a V6, IMO.


Acura needs another supercar but the RL isn't it.

The RL will still move with the best of them.
Old 08-24-2004, 09:54 PM
  #76  
Instructor
 
smap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Age: 40
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
I don't get it either. It makes way more torque per liter than the LS430. And it makes the same torque as the current VQ35 Nissan engine, which is the same size and ALWAYS described as "torquey". I don't think that's torqueless at all. Maybe it's just me...
Your not alone Clutch! Im with ya!
It aint torqueless whatsoever....!!

I feel better now!

To the haters who talk crap about Honda's being "torqueless wonders"

Old 08-25-2004, 12:53 PM
  #77  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
Just like Infinit pulled something out of thin air with their LDW (lane departure warning) system it seems Honda also with this:

"As part of Tuesday's event, Honda also announced new technology that sends a warning signal to a driver when two sensors under the headlights detect a pedestrian in the dark.

The so-called intelligent night vision system technology, a world first, will be available as an option on the new Honda Legend luxury sedan, to be launched in October.

Other car makers such as rival Toyota Motor Corp. have similar technology that displays objects using night vision sensors, but Honda's is the first to pick out pedestrians, enclosing the image in an orange frame in a heads-up display reflected above the dashboard.

Honda did not say how much the night vision system would cost, but an engineer said it would be "a few thousand dollars".

The technology is far from complete: while it is smart enough to recognize people by the shape of the head and shoulders as well as by detecting body temperature, it won't be able to pick them out on a bicycle or under an opaque umbrella.

The system is also useless in temperatures above 86 degrees Fahrenheit."


And you thought the RL would have no options...ha!
Old 08-25-2004, 12:55 PM
  #78  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
It seems like the Legend will be out just before the launch of the RL in NA.
Old 08-25-2004, 01:06 PM
  #79  
OG
 
justinjsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
Just like Infinit pulled something out of thin air with their LDW (lane departure warning) system it seems Honda also with this:

"As part of Tuesday's event, Honda also announced new technology that sends a warning signal to a driver when two sensors under the headlights detect a pedestrian in the dark.

The so-called intelligent night vision system technology, a world first, will be available as an option on the new Honda Legend luxury sedan, to be launched in October.

Other car makers such as rival Toyota Motor Corp. have similar technology that displays objects using night vision sensors, but Honda's is the first to pick out pedestrians, enclosing the image in an orange frame in a heads-up display reflected above the dashboard.

Honda did not say how much the night vision system would cost, but an engineer said it would be "a few thousand dollars".

The technology is far from complete: while it is smart enough to recognize people by the shape of the head and shoulders as well as by detecting body temperature, it won't be able to pick them out on a bicycle or under an opaque umbrella.

The system is also useless in temperatures above 86 degrees Fahrenheit."


And you thought the RL would have no options...ha!

http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13889

repost noob
Old 08-25-2004, 01:14 PM
  #80  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw
Well sure, like I'm going to find it there.


Quick Reply: Official 05RL info ***PG 4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.