Infiniti: M-Series news **Hybrid Revealed (page 34)**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2009, 07:38 AM
  #721  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I don't know, I just can't get myself to like this new M. I think the RL looks much better.

I really can't stand how bulgy the M looks, and the grille looks stupid. Really looks awful to me!
Old 08-19-2009, 07:42 AM
  #722  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I honestly hope it looks better in real life, but I still don't think I'll like it.
Old 08-19-2009, 09:01 AM
  #723  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i like it a lot.
Old 08-19-2009, 09:16 AM
  #724  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
I don't know, I just can't get myself to like this new M. I think the RL looks much better.

I really can't stand how bulgy the M looks, and the grille looks stupid. Really looks awful to me!

If you think the RL looks better you need to tone down your crack intake.

Originally Posted by JJaber06
That first front 3/4 made me instantly think of the new Maxima. The rear and side are beautiful.
I think they share the same hood. And it makes me think Maxima too, this would be the sexier version though.

Last edited by MeehowsBRZ; 08-19-2009 at 09:19 AM.
Old 08-19-2009, 09:21 AM
  #725  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeschicagoRL
If you think the RL looks better you need to tone down your crack intake.
If you think the M looks better you need to tone down your crack intake.

Everyone has different tastes.
Old 08-19-2009, 09:31 AM
  #726  
Burning Brakes
 
brizey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DFW
Age: 54
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I really like it. It has the same general profile of the Panamera but makes it look good instead of goofy.
Old 08-19-2009, 09:51 AM
  #727  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
If you think the M looks better you need to tone down your crack intake.

Everyone has different tastes.
And some people like super fat chick porn, and saying the RL>M is like that, its your "thing" but shouldn't be made known to the public.
Old 08-19-2009, 10:17 AM
  #728  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeschicagoRL
And some people like super fat chick porn, and saying the RL>M is like that, its your "thing" but shouldn't be made known to the public.
That's funny to me because the M looks like a fat person with rolls bulging out all over the place.
Old 08-19-2009, 10:30 AM
  #729  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mikeschicagoRL
I think they share the same hood. And it makes me think Maxima too, this would be the sexier version though.
Uh, no...maxima hood bulges at the back edge close to the a-pillars and flattens towards the grille/front edge. new M hood is flatter at the back edge near the a-pillars and bulges increase near the front edge above headlights. The front edge of the M is curved over the grille, while the front edge of the maxima hood is flat along the grille.






But they should have a resemblence...it is a Nissan Fuga, sold alongside the Maxima in japan.
Old 08-19-2009, 10:40 AM
  #730  
Chloe @ 17mo
 
AsianRage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 3,931
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right now, the only element I don't like is the wheel design that was taken from the 09 Lexus IS.
Old 08-19-2009, 12:54 PM
  #731  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno




Wow, that Maxima doesn't look so good compared to the M in the pictures. But my neighbor has a white one and it looks pretty slick in real life.
Old 08-19-2009, 04:56 PM
  #732  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
The more I look at it the more I think it's too bulbous looking.

Looks like a Korean knock-off of the current M.
Old 08-19-2009, 07:42 PM
  #733  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,112
Received 599 Likes on 417 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
You can roll this car tumbling down a cliff and it'll still look better than anything in the current Acura line
Well said.
Old 08-19-2009, 07:48 PM
  #734  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,112
Received 599 Likes on 417 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
That's funny to me because the M looks like a fat person with rolls bulging out all over the place.
Damn it Jax....I resemble that remark.

Old 08-19-2009, 08:09 PM
  #735  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Sorry ravi.

I didn't mean any harm.
Old 08-19-2009, 08:39 PM
  #736  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,112
Received 599 Likes on 417 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
Sorry ravi.

I didn't mean any harm.
I was just trying to break the tension between you and the

Did it work?

By the way....I know you would never do a drug named after a part of your own ass. But IMO the M looks better than the RL.
Old 08-19-2009, 08:47 PM
  #737  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
All is good.
Old 08-19-2009, 10:20 PM
  #738  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Honda legend is not bad design. very sleek and less bulbous. it just needs front end treatment more in shape of 1 or 2G TSX and will be fine.


Old 08-19-2009, 11:12 PM
  #739  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everytime I see the revised RL, I see the 7th gen US Accord sedan, which isn't good to me.
Old 08-19-2009, 11:22 PM
  #740  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
I really like the new M, especially the euro M3-style trunk lid. Can't wait to see more real-world pics....
Old 08-20-2009, 07:19 AM
  #741  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,112
Received 599 Likes on 417 Posts
Originally Posted by Mokos23
Everytime I see the revised RL, I see the 7th gen US Accord sedan, which isn't good to me.
I feel that way too.
Old 08-20-2009, 12:36 PM
  #742  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by RaviNJCLs
I was just trying to break the tension between you and the

Did it work?

By the way....I know you would never do a drug named after a part of your own ass. But IMO the M looks better than the RL.
Just because I'm not in my 30s and spend all day posting doesn't make me a noob. Nice try though.

Last edited by MeehowsBRZ; 08-20-2009 at 12:40 PM.
Old 08-20-2009, 12:40 PM
  #743  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Honda legend is not bad design. very sleek and less bulbous. it just needs front end treatment more in shape of 1 or 2G TSX and will be fine.


Thats the problem, the back and side profile are nice and then you go to look at the face and its
Old 08-20-2009, 12:40 PM
  #744  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeschicagoRL
Just because I'm not in my 30s and spend all day on the internet doesn't make me a noob. Nice try though.
A noob response if I ever read one.
Old 08-20-2009, 01:06 PM
  #745  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
A noob response if I ever read one.
Old 08-20-2009, 02:48 PM
  #746  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Don't worry too much about Moog. He lives in a different reality than most normal people would care to understand. How the hell a feature that improves the driving experience as well as being fully defeatable is somehow a bad thing could only be construed in that weird, alternate Moog-iverse.....
Old 08-20-2009, 02:52 PM
  #747  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Don't worry too much about Moog. He lives in a different reality than most normal people would care to understand. How the hell a feature that improves the driving experience as well as being fully defeatable is somehow a bad thing could only be construed in that weird, alternate Moog-iverse.....
Sorry, but I'm not the only one who believes syncro-rev is a mess.
(read the thread) :wink:

... and you need your head examined if you think synchro-rev improves the manual driving experience....it takes away from the experience.

...but we have been over this many times already.
Old 08-20-2009, 02:58 PM
  #748  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
DETROIT - Confession: I've never mastered the heel-and-toe downshift on the track. With a bit of practice and in the right car, I can get the rhythm going on a twisty mountain road. On a track, it can take me many laps to get it right, and even then, not consistently. So I was happy to get into a Nissan 370Z with SynchroRev Match for a week and press the button. The feature is an interesting compromise between a full, clutch-it-yourself manual and a twin-clutch or sequential manual, like the kind debated in the latest Lohdown.

My first drive home in the Z was interesting, because I tend to match revs on downshifts (if not heel-and-toe) regularly. So here I was, double-clutch/match-rev downshifting on a car that matches its own revs. Several lost revs, there. Once I got used to the idea, the gearbox matched revs perfectly. In fact, too perfectly -- it knows that at a certain speed, a 3-2 downshift requires, say, a rev to 5000 rpm. It won't waste a drop of precious peak oil revving to 5100.

For that reason, the feature is underwhelming in regular driving, unless you downshift two or three gears regularly. Drop a single gear at most speeds and you won't know it's there. There is a little symbol, though, that lights up on the instrument panel.

How does it work? With a bit of experimentation, you'll find that the sensors try to figure out where you're going while in the neutral gate. Downshift from fourth to third, and you'll get a little rev only as you place it into third. Downshift from fourth to second, for example, and the engine revs as you pull it to the left edge of the horizontal neutral gate, before you pull the shift-lever into gear. So you can rev the Z without touching the throttle pedal, simply by moving the gearshift back and forth, from neutral to neutral-left.

For most of the week, I drove the Z around letting the SynchroRev Match do what I usually do with my two feet. It was mildly amusing and, I'm sure, a bit more fuel-efficient than my efforts. Mostly, I yearned for a few laps around a track where, I'm sure, the feature would improve my lap times.

My wife finally got a ride in the car after a few days. Donna's a dyed-in-the-wool manual gearbox purist who just gave a little scowl when I described the feature. She considers twin-clutch and sequential manuals "cheating."

The rev match feature comes with the $3,000 sport package, which also gets you a limited slip differential, 19-inch Bridgestone Potenzas on forged wheels, front chin and rear spoilers and sport brakes. Unless Nissan ends up selling a lot of these for the track, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that the rev match is mostly a gimmick.

As for the Z itself, Ron Kiino's review in the February issue compares it favorably with the Aston Martin DBS and calls the 370Z "a sports-car steal." I can't find much to disagree with, although Detroit's bombed-out roads emphasize the car's shortened wheelbase and makes it feel a bit more skittish and nervous than the old 350Z. I'm not enamored with the styling. That's a very subjective issue, of course, but just as the new Ford Mustang's facelift is designed to make that car look shorter, Nissan took an existing design and redrew some lines in order to actually make it shorter. Both cars were redesigned to mixed results -- I find the new Mustang and Z designs a bit less flowing and coherent than the cars they replace.

Philosophically, SynchroRev Match is another example of taking some control away from the kind of car that's all about driver control. More so than twin-clutches or sequential gearboxes, it seems to be an example of something its maker did simply because it discovered a way to make technology do something cool. Unlike DSGs, it's not a way to let you make phone calls while driving, or be able to bear the L.A. Freeways' stop-and-go traffic.

And you shouldn't make it be a deal-killer, either for the 370Z or its sport package. Like most stability control systems, SynchroRev Match can be disarmed simply by pressing a button.
http://blogs.motortrend.com/6485388/...tch/index.html

You see, it's not about the fact that you can turn it off, it's the whole idea that it takes away from the driving experience...why come up with it at all?
Old 08-20-2009, 03:07 PM
  #749  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
And you shouldn't make it be a deal-killer, either for the 370Z or its sport package. Like most stability control systems, SynchroRev Match can be disarmed simply by pressing a button.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:14 PM
  #750  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Poor dom...still missing my point and the writers point.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:15 PM
  #751  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
I'm sorry but I too am with the sentiment that I don't think something takes away from the driving experience if you can turn it off with a button. Preferably, I would have SynchroRev be a switch, that you set to ON/OFF so that every time you start the car, it defaults to, well, on or off. It is annoying that it's on all the time, but seeing as how you can still manually heel-toe yourself at JUST the press of a button, it doesn't detract from the driving experience at all.

hell, I don't even like the 370Z. But the SynchroRev is the least of my dislikes about the car. I think it could be a useful tool for newbies getting into manuals and learning how to properly rev match.

You want to know about detracting from the driving experience? Take Lexus's stability control. I'm not sure about their new vehicles but on slightly older Lexi, you needed to do some strange and convoluted procedure to disable it. Something like putting the key into ignition before turning on the car, pressing on the brake pedal 5 times and holding it down on the 5th, then releasing the parking brake and engaging it again, then letting go of the brake pedal. That's something that detracts from the driving experience, especially if you have to do all that compared to pressing a button every time you start the car.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:24 PM
  #752  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Poor dom...still missing my point and the writers point.
If you say so.

I get that it may not work as well as it should and that maybe it shouldn't be there in the first place..................BUT---- IT TURNS OFF which means it does not take anything away from the experience. Until you can somehow show me that is takes away from the driving experience (while being off) I'll stand by my opinion that its a good thing....for those THAT WANT IT.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:24 PM
  #753  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Poor dom...still missing my point and the writers point.
Seems like the author doesn't like this feature because for him it takes away some of "the driving experience" so he pushes the magic little button and holy cow!! its like its not even there.

What's the point of arguing against something that isn't there if you don't want it to be?
Your just bitching for the sake of bitching.

Last edited by MeehowsBRZ; 08-20-2009 at 03:27 PM.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:25 PM
  #754  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco

You want to know about detracting from the driving experience? Take Lexus's stability control. I'm not sure about their new vehicles but on slightly older Lexi, you needed to do some strange and convoluted procedure to disable it. Something like putting the key into ignition before turning on the car, pressing on the brake pedal 5 times and holding it down on the 5th, then releasing the parking brake and engaging it again, then letting go of the brake pedal. That's something that detracts from the driving experience, especially if you have to do all that compared to pressing a button every time you start the car.
That method wasn't published by Lexus. As far as Lexus went, it could not be switched off.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:26 PM
  #755  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
I'm sorry but I too am with the sentiment that I don't think something takes away from the driving experience if you can turn it off with a button. Preferably, I would have SynchroRev be a switch, that you set to ON/OFF so that every time you start the car, it defaults to, well, on or off. It is annoying that it's on all the time, but seeing as how you can still manually heel-toe yourself at JUST the press of a button, it doesn't detract from the driving experience at all.

hell, I don't even like the 370Z. But the SynchroRev is the least of my dislikes about the car. I think it could be a useful tool for newbies getting into manuals and learning how to properly rev match.

You want to know about detracting from the driving experience? Take Lexus's stability control. I'm not sure about their new vehicles but on slightly older Lexi, you needed to do some strange and convoluted procedure to disable it. Something like putting the key into ignition before turning on the car, pressing on the brake pedal 5 times and holding it down on the 5th, then releasing the parking brake and engaging it again, then letting go of the brake pedal. That's something that detracts from the driving experience, especially if you have to do all that compared to pressing a button every time you start the car.
Agree about Lexus

Still, why create something that takes away from the driving experience....especially on a "drivers" car? It's a waste....and a shame.
I agree with the guy from Motortrend.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:26 PM
  #756  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeschicagoRL
Seems like the author doesn't like this feature because for him it takes away some of "the driving experience" so he pushes the magic little button and holy cow!! its like its not even there.

What's the point of arguing against something that isn't there if you don't want it to be?

Your just arguing for the sake of arguing.
Try reading the past posts, :noob:
Old 08-20-2009, 03:33 PM
  #757  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Agree about Lexus

Still, why create something that takes away from the driving experience....especially on a "drivers" car? It's a waste....and a shame.
I agree with the guy from Motortrend.
I can see your point.... IMO I would almost never use it myself. The one time or case I would use it is if I were driving in a time-attack event because no one is good enough to match a computer in rev matching, at least I'm not
Old 08-20-2009, 03:34 PM
  #758  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Try reading the past posts, :noob:
lol, I read it loser. I get it, your panties are all in a bunch because there's a feature for people that aren't hardcore race car drivers like you seem to think you are. Turn it off, wipe of the mascara and move on and stop wasting space.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:35 PM
  #759  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Agree about Lexus

Still, why create something that takes away from the driving experience....especially on a "drivers" car? It's a waste....and a shame.
I agree with the guy from Motortrend.
I'm sure it can only be improved upon. Dual Clutch boxes are getting better and better. Why can't synchro rev match.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:57 PM
  #760  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,112
Received 599 Likes on 417 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeschicagoRL
Just because I'm not in my 30s and spend all day posting doesn't make me a noob. Nice try though.
Good to know. All of your posts have been extremely informative and they are just oozing with insight. And posts like the one you made do not encourage people to call you a noob. How wrong I was.


Quick Reply: Infiniti: M-Series news **Hybrid Revealed (page 34)**



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.