Acura: NSX News
#6041
Team Owner
#6042
AZ Community Team
Ok. So dont bring in the big boys into the discussion when you know the objectives are very different.
when compare to 911, GTR and whatnot... that is why we said, why does it need the battery pack when it can be without it. and NSX will be hundred of pounds lighter = even better performance
when compare to 911, GTR and whatnot... that is why we said, why does it need the battery pack when it can be without it. and NSX will be hundred of pounds lighter = even better performance
Did it achieve it's goal?
No known yet, I woulda though that the torque vectoring woulda brought more razor sharp neutral handling.
However there's ALOT of technology here that's trying to manage ALOT of energy and forces so I would guess right now in Ohio there are dozens of mechanical engineers and S/W engineers reading the early press reviews and wondering where they can tweak the various vehicle electronic parameters they can easily change the shocks, steering, electric/gas motors, brakes,.... and hoping the base chassis has all the right geometries that will require no changes for final production (ie suspension control arm pickup points). This one area that I'm fascinated by, the ability of S/W to fine tune a vehicle through various system inputs (gyro's, accelerometers,...) and control various vehicle systems (powertrain, brakes, suspension, steering,...). Something that Ferrari has mastered really well integrating a supurb chassis with great electronics that don't over-nanny the car, something GM still working on the C7, even the McLaren with the 650.
So I would not be too quick to judge the car until the final production comes out. I would bet a years salary there are many Honda engineers in Ohio, Cailfornia, and Japan working late nights now and maybe looking for a better standard tire
Last edited by Legend2TL; 10-28-2015 at 12:49 PM.
#6043
AZ Community Team
#6044
Team Owner
They aren't changing anything now, based on reviews. You think parts haven't already been approved and in manufacturing already?
#6045
Team Owner
IDK, but my guess was it's a hybrid powertrain technology exercise for Honda.
Did it achieve it's goal?
No known yet, I woulda though that the torque vectoring woulda brought more razor sharp neutral handling.
However there's ALOT of technology here that's trying to manage ALOT of energy and forces so I would guess right now in Ohio there are dozens of mechanical engineers and S/W engineers reading the early press reviews and wondering where they can tweak the various vehicle electronic parameters they can easily change the shocks, steering, electric/gas motors, brakes,.... and hoping the base chassis has all the right geometries that will require no changes for final production (ie suspension control arm pickup points).
So I would not be too quick to judge the car until the final production comes out. I would bet a years salary there are many Honda engineers in Ohio, Cailfornia, and Japan working late nights now.
Did it achieve it's goal?
No known yet, I woulda though that the torque vectoring woulda brought more razor sharp neutral handling.
However there's ALOT of technology here that's trying to manage ALOT of energy and forces so I would guess right now in Ohio there are dozens of mechanical engineers and S/W engineers reading the early press reviews and wondering where they can tweak the various vehicle electronic parameters they can easily change the shocks, steering, electric/gas motors, brakes,.... and hoping the base chassis has all the right geometries that will require no changes for final production (ie suspension control arm pickup points).
So I would not be too quick to judge the car until the final production comes out. I would bet a years salary there are many Honda engineers in Ohio, Cailfornia, and Japan working late nights now.
and i think what we saw is the final production version since they are giving all the major magazine to review.
If the production version is somehow different, then i would expect another delay because it will require brand new testing, approval process, parts/logistics all over again.
Last edited by oonowindoo; 10-28-2015 at 12:51 PM.
#6046
Team Owner
I think that was already done with the 1G Insight...
#6047
AZ Community Team
I would bet there still are some S/W changes going on, and will continue even after sales start. There may be chassis changes but probably not. Typically S/W does not affect production schedule as long as the poor verification and validation team get enough time to do regression testing of the new build.
#6048
AZ Community Team
I think that was already done with the RLX.
and i think what we saw is the final production version since they are giving all the major magazine to review.
If the production version is somehow different, then i would expect another delay because it will require brand new testing, approval process, parts/logistics all over again.
and i think what we saw is the final production version since they are giving all the major magazine to review.
If the production version is somehow different, then i would expect another delay because it will require brand new testing, approval process, parts/logistics all over again.
Not for S/W as long as V&V gets redone before production start and does not affect certification. And it's not brand new testing, it's mostly change and regression testing.
#6049
Team Owner
If the rumors are true about the next GTR, then NSX is pretty much done before it is released.
#6050
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
LaFerrari was also present on the track, but Ferrari didn't allow testing to be done (too chicken?? )
Is anyone else underwhelmed by the low Hp/Tq numbers of the 3 electric motors? By comparison porsche 918 has 127 front and 154 mid, Laferrari 161, McLaren 177. I like the NSX but feel somewhat underwhelmed by the specs. I think they could have/should have done better. Hopefully with it being turbo they left plenty of headroom for a type-s or something to up the boost and hp/tq
Here's a quick comparo for electric power %:
NSX: 20.8%
918: 31.7%
P1: 19.5%
LaFerrari: 16.9%
Proportionally, only the 918 is better.
As for the general specs, I understand why people would feel underwhelmed. But the way Honda calculates the power seems to be different than others:
918: 608hp engine + 285hp electric = 893hp (Rated at 887hp)
P1: 727hp engine + 177hp electric = 904hp (Rated at 904hp)
LaFerrari: 789hp engine + 161hp electric = 950hp (Rated at 950hp)
NSX: 500hp engine + 119hp electric = 619hp (Rated at 573hp)
It's pretty clear that rated combined power output of the others are calculated by just simply adding the engine output and motor output together.
But for the NSX, Honda is using a different way to calculate. I'm not sure why that's the case, but if we follow the way as the 918/P1/LaFerrari, then the NSX would be rated at 619hp. Would that be better?
As I said before, looking at the engine specs alone, it would seem Honda has left a lot on the table. There's no VTEC, and the peak boost is only at 15.6psi. The new Civic 1.5T has a peak boost of 16.5psi, M3/M4 at 18.9psi, and CLA45 AMG at 26psi for comparison.
The GTR is about performance at all costs. And one of that "costs" is very stiff ride (poor ride comfort, even in regular non-Nismo GTR). That's been repeated in many tests already. The NSX on the other hand, is about being a "everyday" super car. The journalists already went at length to describe how comfortable the NSX is in certain modes, so there's no point of me repeating.
I totally understand that for some people, super cars should be raw, fast at all costs, and ride comfort is not important. But clearly, that's not the point of the NSX. If all you care about is 0-60mph and lap times, and don't care about other things, then the GT-R is for you, not the NSX.
Now, whether you feel the above is important or not, is personal preference. For the NSX, that's what the NSX team wanted to achieve, and to them, that's important.
you won't know if it has similar performance until someone does a comparison test.
Why did McLaren P1, Ferrari LaFDerrari and Porsche 918 do the same as well? More than likely as a technology exercise in powertrain, which lends itself to better handling with vehicle dynamics through a heck of alot of motors/batteries/electronics and importantly alot of S/W.
Why did McLaren P1, Ferrari LaFDerrari and Porsche 918 do the same as well? More than likely as a technology exercise in powertrain, which lends itself to better handling with vehicle dynamics through a heck of alot of motors/batteries/electronics and importantly alot of S/W.
I remember when the GT-R came out, 480hp and 3900lb were underwhelming too. At that time, Z06 was making over 500hp at 3200lb; Viper was at 600hp at 3400lb, and 911 Turbo was also over 500hp at 3600lb or so. Yet, the GT-R was comfortably faster than these cars.
Not saying the NSX will do the same, but at this moment, drawing any conclusion based on the specs might not be the best thing to do.
If you want fast 0-60mph and lap times, you get the GT-R.
If you want American muscle power with a capable FR chassis, there's the Corvette.
If you want a rear engined car that can do ultra quick 0-60 runs while being reasonably comfortable, there's the 911 Turbo.
However, none of this is the same as the new NSX. The experimental part is about bringing similar technologies found in hypercars like the P1, 918, and LaFerrari into a $150-$200k car. That's what the NSX is about, in one way.
#6051
Ex-OEM King
#6052
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
#6053
Let's compare:
2015 Nissan GTR:
Curb Weight: 3851lbs (base) - 3831lbs (black edition)
Horsepower: 545hp @ 6400rpm
Torque: 463lbft @ 3200-5800rpm
0-60: 3.0s (base) - 2.9s (black edition)
Top speed: 196 mph
Price: $102,000 (base) - $112,000 (black edition)
2017 Acura NSX:
Curb Weight: 3804 lbs
Horsepower: 573hp @ ????rpm
Torque: 476lbft @ ????rpm
0-60: ???? sec
Top speed: 191 mph
Price: $150,000 (base)
2015 Nissan GTR:
Curb Weight: 3851lbs (base) - 3831lbs (black edition)
Horsepower: 545hp @ 6400rpm
Torque: 463lbft @ 3200-5800rpm
0-60: 3.0s (base) - 2.9s (black edition)
Top speed: 196 mph
Price: $102,000 (base) - $112,000 (black edition)
2017 Acura NSX:
Curb Weight: 3804 lbs
Horsepower: 573hp @ ????rpm
Torque: 476lbft @ ????rpm
0-60: ???? sec
Top speed: 191 mph
Price: $150,000 (base)
2015 GTR with 6.5k miles only $$80k.
2015 NISSAN GTR-35
and who said NSX has same performance? put them with same tire setup and in same driving condition. NSX will smoke it above 100mph with superior handling and aerodynamics. NSX is much wider and implanted with lower ride height. it is luxury and exotic sports car in same. No one has done this before. its ground breaking.
#6054
Porsche 911 Turbo 0-60 is 2.6sec.
0-150mph is 16.5sec
2014 Porsche 911 Turbo S Tested ? Review ? Car and Driver
2017 Acura NSX - First Drive
There are no official performance numbers just yet, and we won't be able to pull data on the car for a good while, but I'm told the machine can pants a 911 Turbo in the sixty sprint. I believe it. Launch Control is a wonder. There's zero wheel spin and exactly no hesitation, just a relentless press for the speedometer's upper octaves.
There are no official performance numbers just yet, and we won't be able to pull data on the car for a good while, but I'm told the machine can pants a 911 Turbo in the sixty sprint. I believe it. Launch Control is a wonder. There's zero wheel spin and exactly no hesitation, just a relentless press for the speedometer's upper octaves.
Last edited by SSFTSX; 10-28-2015 at 10:21 PM.
#6055
2024 Honda Civic Type R
and who said NSX has same performance? put them with same tire setup and in same driving condition. NSX will smoke it above 100mph with superior handling and aerodynamics. NSX is much wider and implanted with lower ride height. it is luxury and exotic sports car in same. No one has done this before. its ground breaking.
#6056
Moderator
Revolutionary! Not to mention the class-leading ground clearance and aerodynamic mirrors along with a/c vent locations and hybrid vaporcar fuel economic. NSX will smoke everything - P1, 918, GT-R, ILX 2.Slow... everything except RLX-SHSHAWD-PAWS with upgraded ultra-performance summer tires.
The following users liked this post:
RPhilMan1 (10-30-2015)
#6057
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
To be fair..
* > said physicist
It's also a different vehicle, in terms of customer market. The NSX is going for the 911 Turbo, Hurracan, 488 market. All mid or rear engined.
Many people still view the GTR as a boy racer sorta car, yeah it's fast but it looks bulky and has a video arcade as a instrument panel.
Many people still view the GTR as a boy racer sorta car, yeah it's fast but it looks bulky and has a video arcade as a instrument panel.
boy racer sorta car.. that did the ring in 7:08...
IF NSX can match 0-60 time of 911 than it can easily beat it in 0-150mph sprint.
Porsche 911 Turbo 0-60 is 2.6sec.
0-150mph is 16.5sec
2014 Porsche 911 Turbo S Tested ? Review ? Car and Driver
Porsche 911 Turbo 0-60 is 2.6sec.
0-150mph is 16.5sec
2014 Porsche 911 Turbo S Tested ? Review ? Car and Driver
Revolutionary! Not to mention the class-leading ground clearance and aerodynamic mirrors along with a/c vent locations and hybrid vaporcar fuel economic. NSX will smoke everything - P1, 918, GT-R, ILX 2.Slow... everything except RLX-SHSHAWD-PAWS with upgraded ultra-performance summer tires.
#6058
Senior Moderator
Revolutionary! Not to mention the class-leading ground clearance and aerodynamic mirrors along with a/c vent locations and hybrid vaporcar fuel economic. NSX will smoke everything - P1, 918, GT-R, ILX 2.Slow... everything except RLX-SHSHAWD-PAWS with upgraded ultra-performance summer tires.
The following users liked this post:
RPhilMan1 (10-30-2015)
#6060
Team Owner
have you looked at terriable fuel economic and maintiance cost of GTR. you cannot compare it with rock solid build quality of NSX. GTR will simply depreciate more.
2015 GTR with 6.5k miles only $$80k.
2015 NISSAN GTR-35
and who said NSX has same performance? put them with same tire setup and in same driving condition. NSX will smoke it above 100mph with superior handling and aerodynamics. NSX is much wider and implanted with lower ride height. it is luxury and exotic sports car in same. No one has done this before. its ground breaking.
2015 GTR with 6.5k miles only $$80k.
2015 NISSAN GTR-35
and who said NSX has same performance? put them with same tire setup and in same driving condition. NSX will smoke it above 100mph with superior handling and aerodynamics. NSX is much wider and implanted with lower ride height. it is luxury and exotic sports car in same. No one has done this before. its ground breaking.
And how can you talk about depreciation for a car that hasn't even come out yet? You better believe NSX prices will plummet. Those who can afford it, will buy new. Same goes for any car that costs 100k+.
Please tell me, how often do you drive over 100mph? Never? That's what I thought. Who cares about performance numbers that high. And even so, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE NSX PERFORMANCE WILL BE, other than your wishful thinking.
GTR > NSX.
#6061
Team Owner
Right now it's 36+36 in front plus 47 in the rear. If we simply add it up, that's 119hp. 119hp out of 573hp = 20.8% power from electric motors.
Here's a quick comparo for electric power %:
NSX: 20.8%
918: 31.7%
P1: 19.5%
LaFerrari: 16.9%
Proportionally, only the 918 is better.
As for the general specs, I understand why people would feel underwhelmed. But the way Honda calculates the power seems to be different than others:
918: 608hp engine + 285hp electric = 893hp (Rated at 887hp)
P1: 727hp engine + 177hp electric = 904hp (Rated at 904hp)
LaFerrari: 789hp engine + 161hp electric = 950hp (Rated at 950hp)
NSX: 500hp engine + 119hp electric = 619hp (Rated at 573hp)
Here's a quick comparo for electric power %:
NSX: 20.8%
918: 31.7%
P1: 19.5%
LaFerrari: 16.9%
Proportionally, only the 918 is better.
As for the general specs, I understand why people would feel underwhelmed. But the way Honda calculates the power seems to be different than others:
918: 608hp engine + 285hp electric = 893hp (Rated at 887hp)
P1: 727hp engine + 177hp electric = 904hp (Rated at 904hp)
LaFerrari: 789hp engine + 161hp electric = 950hp (Rated at 950hp)
NSX: 500hp engine + 119hp electric = 619hp (Rated at 573hp)
#6062
Senior Moderator
p90d: 0-60 in 2.6 http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/se...review/photos/
#6063
Team Owner
SSFTSX thinks that honda is the only company that tests it's cars in a wind tunnel, or does any engineering/testing at all on it's cars
Poor SSFTSX...
Poor SSFTSX...
#6065
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
#6066
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
Since some of you guys are obsessed with 0-60 sprint time, here's another car with 2.6: 2017 R8 V10 NA.
2017 Audi R8 V10 Plus First Test Review
2017 Audi R8 V10 Plus First Test Review
#6067
0-60 ugh.. give me quarter mile time and trap speeds, 0-100, 0-150 times. give me nurburgring times
#6068
Team Owner
The following users liked this post:
00TL-P3.2 (10-30-2015)
#6069
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
#6070
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
#6071
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
Lol i dont know man. I was just at Nurburgring a couple weeks ago and there were lots of super cars like 911's and Ferrari's. There was even a Gumbert Apollo! Also saw a C6 Vette and a relatively new Mustang on it...along with some JDM representives such as S2000's, Type R's, FR-S, etc. There were also quite a lot of M3's and M4's. But gotta say, there were more Ferrari's and Porsches's than all the other cars....lol...so ya...
#6072
I feel the need...
I wouldn't say definitely. Still haven't heard a peep from my dealer on how they will officially handle the spec sheet. If Acura thinks they will be getting a tidal wave of prospective buyers ordering a $170k car sight unseen without a test drive, they might be a bit surprised at the low take rate. Even supply restricted, its still not a prancing horse.
And the maintenance on this complicated piece of machinery, as they say, if you have to ask...
And the maintenance on this complicated piece of machinery, as they say, if you have to ask...
#6073
Team Owner
I wouldn't say definitely. Still haven't heard a peep from my dealer on how they will officially handle the spec sheet. If Acura thinks they will be getting a tidal wave of prospective buyers ordering a $170k car sight unseen without a test drive, they might be a bit surprised at the low take rate. Even supply restricted, its still not a prancing horse.
And the maintenance on this complicated piece of machinery, as they say, if you have to ask...
And the maintenance on this complicated piece of machinery, as they say, if you have to ask...
while the take rate is low but the supply is even lower. So getting them sold will not be a problem at all.
Regardless what we think of this car, there will be enough buyers for every car if the supply is low enough.
#6074
I feel the need...
while the take rate is low but the supply is even lower. So getting them sold will not be a problem at all.
Regardless what we think of this car, there will be enough buyers for every car if the supply is low enough.
#6075
Orly? I sure hope that Acura's slump in reliability doesn't translate into the NSX. Maybe you missed the memo, but Acura IS NOT ANY MORE RELIABLE THAN ANYONE ELSE THESE DAYS.
And how can you talk about depreciation for a car that hasn't even come out yet? You better believe NSX prices will plummet. Those who can afford it, will buy new. Same goes for any car that costs 100k+.
Please tell me, how often do you drive over 100mph? Never? That's what I thought. Who cares about performance numbers that high. And even so, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE NSX PERFORMANCE WILL BE, other than your wishful thinking.
GTR > NSX.
And how can you talk about depreciation for a car that hasn't even come out yet? You better believe NSX prices will plummet. Those who can afford it, will buy new. Same goes for any car that costs 100k+.
Please tell me, how often do you drive over 100mph? Never? That's what I thought. Who cares about performance numbers that high. And even so, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE NSX PERFORMANCE WILL BE, other than your wishful thinking.
GTR > NSX.
It very verstile .
Our short sprint around Honda’s high-speed oval circuit didn’t allow us to assess the NSX’s on-the-limit handling. However, our impressions are generally positive; this feels like a car with a wide range of abilities, as well suited to comfortable cruising as thrashing along a B-road. - See more at: 2016 Honda NSX review
#6077
Team Owner
Edit: Unless, of course, Honda raises the ride height of the NSX to have best in class ground clearance, that is.
#6078
Team Owner
I wouldn't say definitely. Still haven't heard a peep from my dealer on how they will officially handle the spec sheet. If Acura thinks they will be getting a tidal wave of prospective buyers ordering a $170k car sight unseen without a test drive, they might be a bit surprised at the low take rate. Even supply restricted, its still not a prancing horse.
And the maintenance on this complicated piece of machinery, as they say, if you have to ask...
And the maintenance on this complicated piece of machinery, as they say, if you have to ask...
Granted, not all people wanting one are on Prime, but what, that's maybe another 20-30 units on top of that? Acura better have one hell of a marketing campaign for this car once it launches. Otherwise it'll go the way of the RLX...
#6079
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I think the Vapor car looks better than the GT-R
The following users liked this post:
00TL-P3.2 (10-30-2015)
#6080
i dont remember the last time i went 0-60 from a dead stop at wot. i did just a do 100 to 165 pull in my boosted 350z the other night. i do track my car on occasion too.